DOCSLIB.ORG

SWP Research Paper 2008/RP 01, January 2008, 112 Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SWP Research Paper 2008/RP 01, January 2008, 112 Pages SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Daniela Kietz and Volker Perthes (Eds.) The Potential of the Council Presidency An Analysis of Germany’s Chairmanship of the EU, 2007 RP 1 January 2008 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2008 SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3−4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Marie McGinley, Alexandra Wagner, and Markus Wagner (English version of SWP-Studie 24/07) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Conclusions 56 Holding all the Cards. Strong German Impulses for Police Co-operation 7 The Presidency in the Council System: Daniela Kietz Functions, Scope for Manoeuvre and Room for Improvement 64 The Profile of the German Presidency in the ENP: Daniela Kietz Regulated Stimulation and Complex Bargaining Kai-Olaf Lang 19 The ‘Berlin Declaration’— Trial Run for Negotiations on the 71 Efficiency and Its Costs: Constitutional Treaty The “Strategy for a New Partnership” Daniela Schwarzer with Central Asia Andrea Schmitz 25 Pruning, Plundering and Reconstructing. Work on the Constitutional Treaty 76 The German EU-Presidency’s Russia Dossier: Andreas Maurer between Rational Interests and Neighbourhood Conflicts 32 Lisbon in Berlin and Brussels— Rainer Lindner the Lisbon Strategy under the German Presidency 82 The Council Presidency and the Middle East Peter Becker Peace Process: Limited Scope for Action, Primacy of Diplomacy 38 Between Transatlantic Integration and the Muriel Asseburg Doha Round: The German Presidency as Impulse-Giver and Impartial Broker in Trade 88 The Council Presidency and EU Relations with Policy Making Latin America: Competent Management, Little Stormy-Annika Mildner Lasting Impact Jörg Husar / Günther Maihold 44 Far-reaching Decisions in Favour of an Integrated Energy and Climate Policy 95 Scope and Limitations of the Council Presidency. Susanne Dröge / Oliver Geden An Evaluation of the German Presidency in Light of the Reform Treaty 49 Asylum and Immigration Policy: Daniela Kietz / Andreas Maurer Efficient Realisation of a Modest Agenda Roderick Parkes 111 Abbreviations 112 Authors and Editors Problems and Conclusions The Potential of the Council Presidency. An Analysis of Germany’s Chairmanship of the EU, 2007 Germany acceded to the Presidency of the EU in the first semester of 2007 at a difficult time in the history of European integration. The proposed European Con- stitutional Treaty had been scuppered by two referen- dums; indeed, nine member states refused to ratify this Treaty following its signature. In such a situation, the German Presidency had to operate on the assump- tion of a considerable growth in reservations against the further integration planned in the Constitutional Treaty, as well as against the European Institutions and their policies. The Federal Government perceived this crisis as a task—namely, to recalibrate the Euro- pean project in order to meet the great challenges of the age. The authors of this study seek to do more than merely tick off the goals achieved—or not—by the EU-Presidency. The individual contributions concen- trate on the twin questions what kind of demands par- ticular situations placed on the German Presidency, and whether the Presidency efficiently and effectively matched its various functions—management of Coun- cil business, negotiation of compromises at all levels etc.—to these demands. The processes and strategies by which the Chair sought to fulfil these functions receive particular attention in this study. The individual contributions examine the resources the Chair had at its disposal, how it used them, the particular modi operandi for which it plumped, which national contextual factors defined its scope for action and which ‘external’ factors affected its capacity to meet these demands. The analysis of the tasks performed by the Presidency are thus judged against a more nuanced background taking account of divergent situations and the differ- ent scope for action which these situations offered up. The stocktaking of the German Presidency made here is broadly positive—in line with the impression given elsewhere. Almost all the contributions to this study credit the German Presidency with a solid management performance, which paved the way for numerous breakthroughs in negotiations. Contrary to the expectations of many commentators, the German Presidency proved itself an open, determined, and broadly neutral broker of compromises. In the most SWP-Berlin An Analysis of the German EU-Presidency, 2007 January 2008 5 Problems and Conclusions sensitive dossiers, the factors contributing to German sensitive area between 27 member states. At the same success included: resorting to expertise from within time, this success negated the original goal of bring- the Federal Government as well as from the country’s ing the basic questions of integration out from behind regional level; efficient management and a clear closed doors. In the case of the Berlin Declaration and setting of priorities; an array of resource—intense the Constitutional Treaty, the German Presidency bilateral consultations and informal talks; the decisive did not attempt in the first place to foster a sufficient personal commitment of the Chancellor and the degree of consensus within society; the priority re- Foreign Minister. mained to achieve consensus between democratically In its function as impulse-giver, the Presidency elected governments. The risk was clear: in repeated launched a notably large number of projects, like the referendums on the Reform Treaty, the population of uploading of those parts of the Prüm Treaty dealing one or more countries could block the implementa- with transnational criminality to the legal framework tion of the Treaty by recourse to a veto. Yet, irrespec- of the EU. At the same time, the Germans’ long-term tive of whether referendums brake the integration strategic guidance of conflict-loaded negotiations was process, the challenge of creating a new consensus in less happy. Detractors pointed out that the national European policy between governments and voters interests of the German Presidency inhibited the remains. efficient performance of this function—not least in The study closes with a glance at the changes to the migration policy. Council system conceived in the Reform Treaty. These The analysis offered here leads to the broader ques- change the contextual conditions for the work of all tion whether the German Presidency—crowned as it Presidencies from 2009. In particular, the projected was with success in the short-term and bolstered by introduction of a president of the European Council wide-ranging political and personnel resources—has and the strengthening of the Council within the in- provided a sustainable model for future presidencies. stitutional system of the EU, pose questions about the In the areas of Common Foreign and Security Policy coherence of the current institutional design. Can one (CFSP) and of co-operation in the area of police and expect the future President to enjoy the same capacity criminal law it was clear that, in an EU of 27, unani- for giving impulses as an individual head of state and mous decision-making in Council has reached its government in his or her current function as Presi- limits. Germany could only achieve the necessary dent of the European Council? One need only think of consensus by undertaking a range of bilateral con- the strategic actions and commitment of the German sultations and informal talks within the framework Council President, Angela Merkel, and of the Chan- of its slick, focussed, highly-disciplined and resolute cellery in climate policy or transatlantic economic organisation of the proceedings in the working bodies co-operation, where manifold national administrative of the Council. Small and medium-sized EU states, and political resources were successfully put to use. bereft of comparable resources, would have difficul- The heads of state and government today enjoy a ties handling a similarly broad range of dossiers in as (fleeting) prominence as Council Presidents for a energetic a manner. This points to the limitations of semester, which is unlikely to be compensated for by the rotation system of the Council Chair under certain the system of 2009. Their apparent demotion suggests decision-making rules involving all 27 member states. that there will be tension between the new President Similar reservations apply to the modus operandi of and the heads of government. The latter will in future the German Chair during the negotiations over the merely be ‘normal’ members of the European Council Berlin Declaration and the Constitutional Treaty—two even under their own Presidency. issues which threw up exceptional challenges for the German Presidency, and which it approached in a manner which was intensive in terms of organisation and negotiation. Analysis of both cases poses the question whether discretionary negotiations on the basis of informational asymmetries can and should become the rule. As practiced by the Germans, such negotiations proved effective: thanks to the high de- gree of confidentiality associated with it, the process proved suitable for achieving consensus in a highly SWP-Berlin An Analysis of the German EU-Presidency, 2007 January 2008 6 1. Difficulties in the Analysis and Evaluation of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eiropas Parlaments
    EIROPAS PARLAMENTS 2004 2009 Iekšējā tirgus un patērētāju aizsardzības komiteja un Drošības un aizsardzības apakškomiteja IMCO(2005)0623_1 PROTOKOLS uzklausīšanai par iepirkumiem aizsardzības sistēmas vajadzībām iekšējā tirgū, kas notika 2005. gada 23. jūnijā no plkst. 15.00 līdz plkst. 18.30 BRISELĒ Sanāksmi atklāja ceturtdien, 2005. gada 23. jūnijā plkst. 15.00 priekšsēdētāja Karl von Wogau (Drošības un aizsardzības apakškomitejas priekšsēdētāja) vadībā. Iekšējā tirgus un patērētāju aizsardzības komitejas referents Joachim Wuermeling atklāja uzklausīšanu, sveicot runātājus un Rūpniecības, pētniecības un enerģētikas komitejas atzinuma projekta sagatavotāju Gunnar Hökmark. Priekšsēdētājs Phillip Whitehead atvainojās par to, ka nevarēs vadīt uzklausīšanu, ņemot vērā sanāksmes ar Apvienotās Karalistes prezidentūru, pēc kā priekšsēdētājs deva vārdu Angelika Beer, Drošības un aizsardzības apakškomitejas atzinuma projekta sagatavotājai. Angelika Beer izklāstīja dažus sava atzinuma projekta punktus. Sanāksmes priekšsēdētājs Karl von Wogau deva vārdu šādiem runātājiem: Burkhard Schmitt, Drošības izpētes institūta Parīzē pārstāvis Dr. Hartmut Kuchle, Starptautiskā pārveides centra BICC pārstāvis Arturo Alfonso-Merino, Eiropas Aizsardzības aģentūras (EDA) pārstāvis François Lureau, Valsts apgādes aģentūras pārstāvis (Francija) Timm Meyer, valsts pasūtījuma speciālists un Eiropas Rūpniecības un darba devēju konfederāciju savienības (UNICE) valsts pasūtījuma darba grupas priekšsēdētājs, Percurt Green valsts aizsardzības nozares pārstāvis
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C72E Volume 44 of the European Communities 6 March 2001
    ISSN 0378-6986 Official Journal C72E Volume 44 of the European Communities 6 March 2001 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER (2001/C 72 E/001) E-0326/00 by Camilo Nogueira Román to the Commission Subject: Swordfish catch quotas ............................................... 1 (2001/C 72 E/002) E-0487/00 by Jens-Peter Bonde to the Commission Subject: Comitology ..................................................... 2 (2001/C 72 E/003) E-0539/00 by Raffaele Costa to the Council Subject: Pay of officials of the European Investment Bank (EIB) ............................. 3 (2001/C 72 E/004) E-0554/00 by Theodorus Bouwman and Karla Peijs to the Commission Subject: Hours of work for cockpit crew, air traffic safety and the internal market .................. 4 (2001/C 72 E/005) E-0696/00 by Brigitte Langenhagen to the Commission Subject: Streamlining procedures for drawing up Court of Auditors’ reports ...................... 5 (2001/C 72 E/006) E-0711/00 by Ioannis Marínos to the Council Subject: Statements by the British Foreign Secretary on Cyprus ............................. 6 (2001/C 72 E/007) E-0823/00 by Michiel van Hulten to the Commission Subject: European school milk measure .......................................... 7 (2001/C 72 E/008) E-0860/00 by Rosa Miguélez Ramos and Luis Berenguer Fuster to the Commission Subject: Fisheries agreement with Mexico ......................................... 8 (2001/C 72 E/009) E-0862/00 by Marielle De Sarnez to the Commission Subject: Commission view on the introduction of advertising into state educational establishments ......... 8 (2001/C 72 E/010) E-0947/00 by Rosa Miguélez Ramos to the Commission Subject: Income and social protection of women employed in shellfish harvesting .................
    [Show full text]
  • Is Europe Back on Track? Impetus from the German EU Presidency
    Is Europe back on track? Impetus from the German EU Presidency CEPS Working Document No. 273/July 2007 Sebastian Kurpas & Henning Riecke Abstract Rarely has an EU Presidency been met with such high expectations as Germany’s in the first half of 2007. With hindsight, it might be said that these expectations have largely been fulfilled. The agreement on a detailed mandate for the upcoming Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) under the Portuguese Presidency now offers a way forward for a Union that has been ‘in crisis’ since the French and Dutch no-votes. This report offers an overview of the German Presidency’s aims in the various policy areas and makes an assessment of the achievements of its six-month term. A summary of the content and structural background of German EU policy is given, explaining developments since unification, Germany’s motivations for European integration, public opinion on European integration and the stances taken by the key political players in Germany. Insight into the organisational structures of the Presidency appears in the annex. While acknowledging the difficulty of gauging the exact impact of the German presidency in relation to other factors, the report draws mostly positive conclusions on internal policies, where agreement on many concrete measures from the presidency’s work programme could be achieved, notably on the single market, justice and home affairs, climate protection and energy policy. With the ‘Berlin Declaration’ Germany achieved a show of unity for the future of the Union that was an auspicious start for the talks on treaty reform. While it is clear that the agreement reached was not only on Germany’s merit, the presidency played a prominent and constructive role throughout the negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ausgabe 3-2010
    61855 3/2010 europa-union deutschland Aktuelles aus P olitik und Verbandsleben ge s onder ten Die EU braucht Z u s t im m u n g des Parlaments selbstbewusste bei Kompetenz- übertragungen Parlamente haben die Ab- geordneten des m 30. Juni vor einem Jahr hat das Bun- B u n d e s t a g s Adesverfassungsgericht sein Urteil zum seit Beginn der Vertrag von Lissabon gesprochen. Zum Jah- neuen Legis- restag des Urteils haben die Parlamentarier- laturp erio de gruppen der Europa-Union Deutschland im verstärkt ge- Bundestag und im Europäischen Parlament nutzt. Ausdruck eine fraktionsübergreifende Initiative ergrif- dieses neuen fen. Die Vorstandsmitglieder beider Gruppen, Engagements die Bundestagsabgeordneten Dr. Eva Högl für eine ver- (SPD), Dr. Günter Krings (CDU / CSU), Micha- besserte Euro- el Link (FDP) und Manuel Sarrazin (Grüne) pafähigkeit des Ein Jahr nach dem Lissabon-Urteil: Über die neue Rolle der Parlamente diskutierten sowie die Europaparlamentarier Alexander Parlaments ist Bundestagspräsident Norbert Lammert (r.) und Hans-Gert Pöttering, Präsident Alvaro (FDP). Michael Cramer (Grüne), Mat- die deutlich ge- des Europäischen Parlaments von 2007 bis 2009, auf Einladung der EUD- Parlamentariergruppe und der JEF (mehr dazu auf Seite 3) . Bild: EUD thias Grote (SPD) und Joachim Zeller (CDU / stiegene Anzahl CSU) haben eine gemeinsame Erklärung von beschlossenen Stellungnahmen zu eu- ker europäisiert und sich die Bundestags- abgegeben. Darin mahnen sie eine enge ropapolitischen Fragen nach Artikel 23 des fraktionen in die Konsultationsprozesse Zusammenarbeit der Abgeordneten von Grundgesetzes. der Europäischen Union einbringen. Alle Bundestag und Europäischem Parlament Ausschüsse des Hauses müssen sich mit an, fordern eine stärkere Europäisierung des ENGE ABSTIMMUNG ZWISCHEN den Vorhaben der europäischen Gesetz- Deutschen Bundestages und sprechen sich BUNDESTAG UND EP IST WICHTIG gebung befassen und an der Willensbil- für einen regelmäßigen Dialog der EU-Orga- dung teilhaben.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Transformation of the Retail Payments Ecosystem European Central Bank and Banca D’Italia Joint Conference
    Digital transformation of the retail payments ecosystem European Central Bank and Banca d’Italia joint conference 30 November and 1 December 2017 Rome, Italy programme Thursday, 30 November 2017 08:00 Registration and coffee 09:00 Welcome remarks Ignazio Visco, Banca d’Italia Introductory speech Yves Mersch, European Central Bank Topic I – Digital evolution of retail payments 09:45 Panel discussion: Digital evolution of retail payments – a global scan from a central bank perspective Panellists: Veerathai Santiprabhob, Bank of Thailand Reinaldo Le Grazie, Banco Central do Brasil Denis Beau, Banque de France Francois E. Groepe, South African Reserve Bank Moderator: Yves Mersch, European Central Bank 11:00 Coffee break 2 11:30 Keynote speech: The impact of digital innovation on banking and payments Chris Skinner, Fintech commentator and author 12:00 Panel discussion: How to foster innovation and integration in retail payments Panellists: Massimo Cirasino, World Bank Group Luisa Crisigiovanni, Altroconsumo Elie Beyrouthy, American Express Pierre Petit, European Central Bank Javier Santamaría, European Payments Council Moderator: Paolo Marullo Reedtz, Banca d’Italia 13:15 Lunch break 14:30 Academic session: On the way to a digital retail payments ecosystem – drivers and inhibitors Are instant retail payments becoming the new normal? Lola Hernández (co-authors Monika E. Hartmann, Mirjam Plooij and Quentin Vandeweyer), European Central Bank 3 The future of digital retail payments in Europe: a role for central bank issued crypto cash? Ruth Wandhöfer,
    [Show full text]
  • The BIS: Mission, Activities, Governance and Financial Results
    Organisation of the BIS as at 31 March 2017 Board of Directors Chairman of the Board Audit Banking & Risk Management Administrative Nomination Committee Committee Board Committee Committee Secretariat General Manager Legal Internal Service Audit Deputy General Manager Monetary & Banking General Financial Financial Secretariat Economic Department Department Stability Institute Stability Board Secretariat Risk Treasury Communications Economic Analysis Management International Asset Basel Committee Management Association Corporate Facility on Banking of Deposit Management Financial Stability Policy Supervision Insurers Banking Compliance* Operational Services Corporate Statistics & International Security Research Committee on the Association of Support Global Financial Insurance Financial System Supervisors Analysis Human Finance Resources Representative Office for the Committee on Americas Payments and Information Market Management Infrastructures Services Representative Office for Asia and the Pacific** Meeting Services Markets Committee Central Bank Governance Group Irving Fisher Committee * Direct access to the Audit Committee. *** AlsoDirect provides access banking to the services Audit to Committee. the region’s monetary authorities. ** Also provides banking services to the region’s monetary authorities. 136 BIS 87th Annual Report The BIS: mission, activities, governance and financial results The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) serves central banks in their pursuit of monetary and financial stability, fosters international cooperation in those areas and acts as a bank for central banks. In outline, the BIS pursues this mission by: • facilitating dialogue and collaboration among central banks and other authorities that are responsible for promoting financial stability; • conducting research on policy issues confronting central banks and financial supervisory authorities; • acting as a prime counterparty for central banks in their financial transactions; and • serving as an agent or trustee in connection with international financial operations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Constitution for Europe and the Lisbon Treaty
    Bogdan Koszel Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań FRENCH-GERMAN COOPERATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION IN 2007-20131 1. The Constitution for Europe and the Lisbon Treaty The Bundestag election campaign in the second half of 2005 overlapped with a serious crisis in the European Union that resulted from the failure to implement Germany’s coveted project of the Constitution for Europe. The Treaty, pushed by the SPD-Greens coalition government, and especially by Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and Foreign Affairs Minister Joschka Fischer, was signed on 29 October 2004 at the Roman Capitoline Hill and needed to be ratified by the European Parliament and parliaments of EU Member States. After its ratification by the German Bundestag and Bundesrat (12 and 27 May 2005), the finale of the referendum campaign in France was monitored by Germany with great concern as the number of opponents of the European constitution was on the rise in France. The pessimistic scenario came true, and on 29 May 2005 the French (54.87%) rejected the Constitutional Treaty which led to a political upheaval in the European Union. The explicit, though expected, French vote of no confidence for this project disappointed Brussels and puzzled Berlin. After the French referendum, the position of President Jacques Chirac notably weakened in French politics. His political instinct clearly failed him, as his decision on holding the referendum and the assumed victory of supporters of the European Constitution was intended to strengthen his position on the French political arena, which did not happen2. The direct consequence of the unsuccessful referendum was the dismissal of the government of Jean Pierre Raffarin and the appointment of the cabinet of Dominique de Villepin (31 May 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th JUNE 2018 Steigenberger Frankfurter Hof
    20th JUNE 2018 Steigenberger Frankfurter Hof Frankfurt am Main LONDON PARIS LONDON FRANKFURT AMSTERDAM ________ 09.00 LOCAL WELCOME AND OPENING WELCOME DR. NADER MALEKI Founder, FUTURE EUROPE Frankfurt am Main OPENING DR. ANDREAS DOMBRET Chairman, FUTURE EUROPE; MALEKI DOMBRET PRAET Former Member of the Executive Board, Deutsche Bundesbank Frankfurt am Main PARIS LONDON EUROPEAN KEYNOTE SPEECH (pre-recorded) T PETER PRAET Member of the Executive Board European Central Bank Frankfurt am Main PANEL DISCUSSION 1 FINANCING THE EU‘S ECONOMY What do for a fully-fledged Banking Union? · Capital Market Union (CMU) after Brexit · Level-playing field and future competition in a digital economy ·The return to conventional monetary policies and its implication · for financial markets ________ 09.15 LOCAL DISCUSSION IN FRANKFURT PHILIPPE ODDO CEO, ODDO BHF Aktiengesellschaft Frankfurt am Main MICHAEL RUEDIGER CEO, Deka, Frankfurt am Main HANS-JÜRGEN WALTER Partner, Deloitte ODDO RUEDIGER WALTER Financial Services Leader Germany Frankfurt am Main PROF. DR. JOACHIM WUERMELING Member of the Executive Board Deutsche Bundesbank Frankfurt am Main WUERMELING MODERATION PROF. DR. STEFAN COLLIGNON European Institute London School of Economics and Political Science, London ________ 10.00 EUROPEAN DISCUSSION TRANSMITTED TO ALL PARTIES FRANKFUR from Paris: AMSTERDAM LORENZO BINI SMAGHI Chairman of the Board of Directors from Amsterdam: Société Générale, Paris ROLAND BOEKHOUT Member of the Management Board BINI SMAGHI BOEKHOUT HUFELD Banking & Head of Market Leaders from Frankfurt: ING Group, Amsterdam FELIX HUFELD President, Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Bonn HARALD KAYSER Chairman of the Management Board PwC Europe SE (as of July 1st) KAYSER SHAFIK Frankfurt am Main from London: DAME MINOUCHE SHAFIK Director, London School of Economics and Political Science, London MODERATION DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Angela Merkel, Vorsitzende Der CDU Deutschlands 5
    Protokoll 17. Parteitag der CDU Deutschlands 1.–2. Dezember 2003, Leipzig Besser für die Menschen. Protokoll 17. Parteitag der CDU Deutschlands 1.–2. Dezember 2003, Leipzig 2 Protokoll 17. Parteitag der CDU Deutschlands 3 INHALT Seite Eröffnung: Dr. Angela Merkel, Vorsitzende der CDU Deutschlands 5 Wahl des Tagungspräsidiums 9 Beschlussfassung über die Tagesordnung 9 Bestätigung der Antragskommission 9 Wahl der Mandatsprüfungskommission 10 Wahl der Stimmzählkommission 10 Grußworte 10 ࡯ Wolfgang Tiefensee, Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Leipzig 10 ࡯ Prof. Dr. Georg Milbradt, Ministerpräsident des Landes Sachsen 12 ࡯ Pier Ferdinando Casini, Präsident des Abgeordnetenhauses der Republik Italien 15 ࡯ Wilfried Martens, Vorsitzender der Europäischen Volkspartei 17 Bericht der Vorsitzenden der CDU Deutschlands und Vorsitzenden der CDU/CSU-Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag Dr. Angela Merkel MdB 20 Aussprache zum Bericht der Vorsitzenden 45 Bericht der Mandatsprüfungskommission 73 Bericht des Vorsitzenden der Kommission „Soziale Sicherheit“ Bundespräsident a. D. Prof. Dr. Roman Herzog 74 Bericht des Generalsekretärs der CDU Deutschlands, zugleich Einführung in den Antrag des Bundesvorstandes der CDU Deutschlands „Deutschland fair ändern. Ein neuer Generationenvertrag für unser Land.“ Generalsekretär Laurenz Meyer 87 Aussprache und Beschlussfassung 100 Bericht des Vorsitzenden der CDU/CSU-Gruppe der EVP-Fraktion des Europäischen Parlaments Hartmut Nassauer MdEP 172 Antrag des Bundesvorstandes der CDU Deutschlands „Ein modernes Einkommensteuerrecht für
    [Show full text]
  • New Council Secretary-General Takes Office
    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EN Brussels, 27 June 2011 11553/11 PRESSE 174 New Council Secretary-General takes office Uwe Corsepius took office on 26 June as Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union. Mr. Corsepius, aged 50, was European policy advisor to the German Chancellor from 2006 to February 2011 and since then has been economic and financial policy advisor to the Chancellor and G8 sherpa. He will take over from Pierre de Boissieu who has been Secretary-General since 1 December 2009 and was Deputy Secretary-General from October 1999 to 30 November 2009. The Council appointed Mr. Corsepius on 22 December 2009 for the period from 26 June 2011 to 30 June 2015 ( 17603/09 ). It took this decision in accordance with article 240(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. Attached : CV of Uwe Corsepius P R E S S Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0) 2 281 6319 Fax: +32 (0)2 281 8026 [email protected] http://www.consilium.europa.eu/Newsroom 11553/11 1 EN Background The Council of the European Union is assisted by a General Secretariat, under the responsibility of a Secretary-General appointed by the Council. The General Secretariat is engaged in organising, coordinating and ensuring the coherence of the Council's work. It assists the Presidency of the Council in seeking solutions. The General Secretariat of the Council, under the authority of its Secretary-General, also assists the European Council and its President. The Secretary-General of the Council attends the meetings of the European Council and takes all the measures necessary for the organisation of proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Report on the Legal Personality of the European Union (21 November 2001)
    European Parliament Report on the legal personality of the European Union (21 November 2001) Caption: Whereas the three European Communities all have legal personality, and are therefore subjects of international public law, the European Union is simply a Union of States without legal personality of its own, and without the capacity to act at international level. On 21 November 2001, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of the European Parliament submits a report containing proposals for the simplification of the Union's structure and the recognition of its single, legal personality. Source: EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Committee on Constitutional Affairs. Report on the legal personality of the European Union (2001/2021(INI)), Final A5-0409/2001 (Rapporteur: Carlos Carnero González), PE 304.279. [s.l.]: 21.11.2001, 23 p. 23 p. (Session document 1999-2004). Copyright: All rights of reproduction, public communication, adaptation, distribution or dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. The documents available on this Web site are the exclusive property of their authors or right holders. Requests for authorisation are to be addressed to the authors or right holders concerned. Further information may be obtained by referring to the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/european_parliament_report_on_the_legal_personality_of_the_european_union_21_november_ 2001-en-01623e94-fb13-4b30-b888-eb97908f00fe.html Publication date: 04/09/2012
    [Show full text]
  • High-Level Conference on Sustainable Finance It’S High Time for Sustainable Finance
    Representation in Germany High-level conference on sustainable finance It’s high time for sustainable finance Thursday, 22. February 2018 11:30 am - Registration and quick buffet lunch 12:30 - 6:00 pm - Conference European House Unter den Linden 78 10117 Berlin HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE FINANCE 3 Program 12:30 Welcome Note • Richard N. Kuehnel, Representative of the European Commission in Germany 12:45 Key Notes • Valdis Dombrovskis, Vice-President of the European Commission • Michael Meister, Parliamentary State Secretary at the Federal Ministry of Finance 13:15 - 14:15 Opening Debate – the policy context! With an introductory note about the key findings of the High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance by its Chairman, Christian Thimann, Senior Executive AXA Has sustainable finance reached the financial policy mainstream? • Will sustainable finance be a one-off topic or become a strategic issue for the Commission, the Finance Ministry and Central Banks? • Is “sustainable finance” just stepping in for a failing climate policy regime or are we moving to an integrated view of what is needed from the demand and supply side of sustainable capital to avoid catastrophic climate change? • No regret options only or 2 degree compatibility1 – what will govern the ambition level of (sustainable) financial policy? • Does Brexit increase the degrees of freedom for EU (financial) policy makers? Will we see German leadership – or are others like France taking the lead? • Valdis Dombrovskis, Vice-President of the European Commission • Marcel Fratzscher, President, DIW Berlin • Christian Thimann, Senior Executive AXA and Chairman of the High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance • Joachim Wuermeling, Member of the Board, Deutsche Bundesbank Moderator: Kristina Jeromin, Head of Group Sustainability, Deutsche Börse Group 1 i.
    [Show full text]