DOCSLIB.ORG

European Parliament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Parliament EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 GGG Committee on Constitutional Affairs 4 September 2003 PE 323.600/1-32 COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-32 Draft report (PE 323.600) José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos on the draft Treaty on the European Constitution and EP opinion on the convocation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) (11047/2003 – C5-0340/2003 – 2003/0902(CNS)) Motion for a resolution Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 1 (Compromise amendment replacing Recital C and Amendments 12 (Carlos Carnero González), 15 (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 16 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Jean- Maurice Dehousse), 17 (Carlos Carnero González) and 18 (Andrew Nicholas Duff)) Recital C C. the quality of the Convention's work (deletion) on the preparation of the draft Constitution and the reform of the Treaties fully vindicates the decision of the Laeken European Council to move away from the intergovernmental method by adopting Parliament's proposal for the setting up of a constitutional Convention; the result of the Convention, in which the representatives of the European Parliament and of national Parliaments played a central role, shows that open discussions within the Convention are by far more successful than the method followed up to now of intergovernmental conferences held in camera, Or. en AM\506078EN.doc PE 323.600/1-32 EN EN Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 2 (Compromise amendment replacing Recital C and Amendments 19 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Jean-Maurice Dehousse, Luís Marinho, Hans-Peter Martin), 20 (Camilo Nogueira Román), 21 (Carlos Carnero González) and 22 (Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)) Recital D D. it expects to be actively and continually involved not only in the Intergovernmental Conference but also in the future phases of the constitutional process, Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 3 (Compromise amendment replacing Recital F and Amendments 26 (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 29 (Jo Leinen, Jean-Maurice Dehousse, Luís Marinho) and 30 (Joachim Wuermeling) Recital F F. the Convention on the Future of Europe, as well as its predecessor on the Charter of Fundamental Rights, has initiated a new phase in the European integration, during which the European Union will consolidate its legal order into a constitutional order binding its states and citizens, even if the final approval of the Constitution will be given in the form of an international Treaty, Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 4 (Compromise amendment replacing Recital G and Amendments 31 (Jean-Maurice Dehousse), 32 (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 33 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg), 34 (Jacques F. Poos), 35 (Joachim Wuermeling), 36 (Andrew Nicholas Duff) and 37 (Andrew Nicholas Duff)) Recital G G. (deletion) despite the originally many different opinions of the Conventioneers, a large majority of all four component parts of the Convention, including that of the European Parliament, supported the Convention's final proposal, which is therefore based on a fresh and large consensus, even if not all of Parliament's demands concerning democracy, transparency and efficiency in the European Union were met; to reopen the important compromises reached within the Convention would not only jeopardise the progress made by the Convention in re-founding the Union on a more efficient and PE 323.600/1-32 2/14 AM\506078EN.doc EN democratic constitutional basis but would also subvert the whole Convention method, Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 5 (Compromise amendment replacing indent b. of Recital H and Amendments 38b. (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 45 (Joachim Wuermeling), 46 (Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann) and 47 (Richard Corbett)) Recital H, indent b. b. confirmation of the unique nature and of the dual legitimacy of the Union drawn from its states and citizens; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 6 (Compromise amendment replacing indent c. of Recital H and Amendments 38 (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 48 (Richard Corbett), 49 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Luís Marinho) and 51 (Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)) [see also amendment 290 (Teresa Almeida Garrett) for the Portuguese and the Spanish versions] Recital H, indent c. c. commitment to the preservation of the equivalence principle between the states and the interinstitutional balance, which guarantees the Union's double legitimacy; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 7 (Compromise amendment replacing indent e. of Recital H and Amendments 38e. (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 53 (Pervenche Berès), 54 (Ursula Schleicher, Karl von Wogau, Elmar Brok, Joachim Wuermeling, Konrad K. Schwaiger), 55 (Carlos Carnero González) and 56 (Sylvia- Yvonne Kaufmann)) Recital H, indent e. e. development of a historically rooted system of values which, beyond a common AM\506078EN.doc 3/14 PE 323.600/1-32 EN market and in the framework of a social market economy, aims at a better quality of life for Europe's citizens and society at large, as well as economic growth, stability and full employment, the stronger promotion of sustainable development and better implementation of the citizenship of the Union; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 8 (Compromise amendment replacing indent g. of Recital H and Amendments 38f.bis and g. (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 58 (Camilo Nogueira Román), 59 (Richard Corbett), DEVE 1 and AFET 1 + 2) Recital H, indent g. g. the overall constitutional settlement should lead to the restoration of the Union's credibility and its enhanced role at home and abroad; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 9 (Compromise amendment replacing Paragraph G and Amendments 60, 1st sentence (Johannes Voggenhuber, Monica Frassoni, Sir Neil MacCormick) and 65 (Richard Corbett) Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the progress in the European integration and democratic development represented by the Convention's proposed "Constitution for Europe", to be established through an appropriate Treaty establishing a European Constitution, this one being the text expressing the political will of the European citizens and the Member States in a solemn and comprehensive way. Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 10 (Compromise amendment replacing paragraph 2 and Amendments 66 (Andrew Nicholas Duff), 67 (Carlos Carnero González) and 68 (Pervenche Berès)) PE 323.600/1-32 4/14 AM\506078EN.doc EN Paragraph 2 2. Notes with satisfaction that the draft Constitution has entrenched to an important extent the values, objectives, (deletion) principles, (deletion) structures and institutions of Europe's constitutional heritage and has in that way given to the Draft to a great degree not only the quality of a constitutional text but also the capability of its continuous evolution; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 11 (Compromise amendment replacing paragraph 4 and Amendments 76 (Andrew Nicholas Duff) and 77 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Jean-Maurice Dehousse)) Paragraph 4 4. Greatly welcomes the installation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights as an integral, legally binding part of the Constitution (Part II) and stresses the importance of fundamental rights as crucial element of a civic, social and democratic Union; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 12 (Compromise amendment replacing paragraph 6 and Amendments 85 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Jean-Maurice Dehousse, Luís Marinho), 87 (Carlos Carnero González) and 88 (Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)) Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the introduction of a hierarchy and the simplification of the legal acts of the Union and the explicit recognition of the primacy of the Constitution and of the Union law over the law of the Member States; Or. en AM\506078EN.doc 5/14 PE 323.600/1-32 EN Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 13 (Compromise amendment replacing paragraph 7 and Amendments 90 (Andrew Nicholas Duff) and part of 93 (Carlos Carnero González)) Paragraph 7 7. Recognises the steps made towards greater transparency and a clearer categorisation as far as the competencies of the Member States and of the Union are concerned, with the retention of a certain level of flexibility (deletion) to allow for future adaptations (deletion) in an evolving Union with twenty-five or more Member States; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 14 (Compromise amendment replacing paragraph 8 and Amendments 96 (Pervenche Berès), 98 (Jo Leinen, Margrietus J. van den Berg, Jean-Maurice Dehousse) and 100 (Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann)) Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes (deletion) the new "legislative procedure", which will become the general rule, as an essential progress towards an increased democratic legitimacy of the Union's activities, acknowledges the noticeable extension of the codecision and underlines that the latter will have to be pursued further; Or. en Compromise amendment by José María Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado, Dimitris Tsatsos Amendment 15 (Compromise amendment replacing paragraph 9 and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eiropas Parlaments
    EIROPAS PARLAMENTS 2004 2009 Iekšējā tirgus un patērētāju aizsardzības komiteja un Drošības un aizsardzības apakškomiteja IMCO(2005)0623_1 PROTOKOLS uzklausīšanai par iepirkumiem aizsardzības sistēmas vajadzībām iekšējā tirgū, kas notika 2005. gada 23. jūnijā no plkst. 15.00 līdz plkst. 18.30 BRISELĒ Sanāksmi atklāja ceturtdien, 2005. gada 23. jūnijā plkst. 15.00 priekšsēdētāja Karl von Wogau (Drošības un aizsardzības apakškomitejas priekšsēdētāja) vadībā. Iekšējā tirgus un patērētāju aizsardzības komitejas referents Joachim Wuermeling atklāja uzklausīšanu, sveicot runātājus un Rūpniecības, pētniecības un enerģētikas komitejas atzinuma projekta sagatavotāju Gunnar Hökmark. Priekšsēdētājs Phillip Whitehead atvainojās par to, ka nevarēs vadīt uzklausīšanu, ņemot vērā sanāksmes ar Apvienotās Karalistes prezidentūru, pēc kā priekšsēdētājs deva vārdu Angelika Beer, Drošības un aizsardzības apakškomitejas atzinuma projekta sagatavotājai. Angelika Beer izklāstīja dažus sava atzinuma projekta punktus. Sanāksmes priekšsēdētājs Karl von Wogau deva vārdu šādiem runātājiem: Burkhard Schmitt, Drošības izpētes institūta Parīzē pārstāvis Dr. Hartmut Kuchle, Starptautiskā pārveides centra BICC pārstāvis Arturo Alfonso-Merino, Eiropas Aizsardzības aģentūras (EDA) pārstāvis François Lureau, Valsts apgādes aģentūras pārstāvis (Francija) Timm Meyer, valsts pasūtījuma speciālists un Eiropas Rūpniecības un darba devēju konfederāciju savienības (UNICE) valsts pasūtījuma darba grupas priekšsēdētājs, Percurt Green valsts aizsardzības nozares pārstāvis
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C72E Volume 44 of the European Communities 6 March 2001
    ISSN 0378-6986 Official Journal C72E Volume 44 of the European Communities 6 March 2001 English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents Page I (Information) EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITH ANSWER (2001/C 72 E/001) E-0326/00 by Camilo Nogueira Román to the Commission Subject: Swordfish catch quotas ............................................... 1 (2001/C 72 E/002) E-0487/00 by Jens-Peter Bonde to the Commission Subject: Comitology ..................................................... 2 (2001/C 72 E/003) E-0539/00 by Raffaele Costa to the Council Subject: Pay of officials of the European Investment Bank (EIB) ............................. 3 (2001/C 72 E/004) E-0554/00 by Theodorus Bouwman and Karla Peijs to the Commission Subject: Hours of work for cockpit crew, air traffic safety and the internal market .................. 4 (2001/C 72 E/005) E-0696/00 by Brigitte Langenhagen to the Commission Subject: Streamlining procedures for drawing up Court of Auditors’ reports ...................... 5 (2001/C 72 E/006) E-0711/00 by Ioannis Marínos to the Council Subject: Statements by the British Foreign Secretary on Cyprus ............................. 6 (2001/C 72 E/007) E-0823/00 by Michiel van Hulten to the Commission Subject: European school milk measure .......................................... 7 (2001/C 72 E/008) E-0860/00 by Rosa Miguélez Ramos and Luis Berenguer Fuster to the Commission Subject: Fisheries agreement with Mexico ......................................... 8 (2001/C 72 E/009) E-0862/00 by Marielle De Sarnez to the Commission Subject: Commission view on the introduction of advertising into state educational establishments ......... 8 (2001/C 72 E/010) E-0947/00 by Rosa Miguélez Ramos to the Commission Subject: Income and social protection of women employed in shellfish harvesting .................
    [Show full text]
  • Ausgabe 3-2010
    61855 3/2010 europa-union deutschland Aktuelles aus P olitik und Verbandsleben ge s onder ten Die EU braucht Z u s t im m u n g des Parlaments selbstbewusste bei Kompetenz- übertragungen Parlamente haben die Ab- geordneten des m 30. Juni vor einem Jahr hat das Bun- B u n d e s t a g s Adesverfassungsgericht sein Urteil zum seit Beginn der Vertrag von Lissabon gesprochen. Zum Jah- neuen Legis- restag des Urteils haben die Parlamentarier- laturp erio de gruppen der Europa-Union Deutschland im verstärkt ge- Bundestag und im Europäischen Parlament nutzt. Ausdruck eine fraktionsübergreifende Initiative ergrif- dieses neuen fen. Die Vorstandsmitglieder beider Gruppen, Engagements die Bundestagsabgeordneten Dr. Eva Högl für eine ver- (SPD), Dr. Günter Krings (CDU / CSU), Micha- besserte Euro- el Link (FDP) und Manuel Sarrazin (Grüne) pafähigkeit des Ein Jahr nach dem Lissabon-Urteil: Über die neue Rolle der Parlamente diskutierten sowie die Europaparlamentarier Alexander Parlaments ist Bundestagspräsident Norbert Lammert (r.) und Hans-Gert Pöttering, Präsident Alvaro (FDP). Michael Cramer (Grüne), Mat- die deutlich ge- des Europäischen Parlaments von 2007 bis 2009, auf Einladung der EUD- Parlamentariergruppe und der JEF (mehr dazu auf Seite 3) . Bild: EUD thias Grote (SPD) und Joachim Zeller (CDU / stiegene Anzahl CSU) haben eine gemeinsame Erklärung von beschlossenen Stellungnahmen zu eu- ker europäisiert und sich die Bundestags- abgegeben. Darin mahnen sie eine enge ropapolitischen Fragen nach Artikel 23 des fraktionen in die Konsultationsprozesse Zusammenarbeit der Abgeordneten von Grundgesetzes. der Europäischen Union einbringen. Alle Bundestag und Europäischem Parlament Ausschüsse des Hauses müssen sich mit an, fordern eine stärkere Europäisierung des ENGE ABSTIMMUNG ZWISCHEN den Vorhaben der europäischen Gesetz- Deutschen Bundestages und sprechen sich BUNDESTAG UND EP IST WICHTIG gebung befassen und an der Willensbil- für einen regelmäßigen Dialog der EU-Orga- dung teilhaben.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Transformation of the Retail Payments Ecosystem European Central Bank and Banca D’Italia Joint Conference
    Digital transformation of the retail payments ecosystem European Central Bank and Banca d’Italia joint conference 30 November and 1 December 2017 Rome, Italy programme Thursday, 30 November 2017 08:00 Registration and coffee 09:00 Welcome remarks Ignazio Visco, Banca d’Italia Introductory speech Yves Mersch, European Central Bank Topic I – Digital evolution of retail payments 09:45 Panel discussion: Digital evolution of retail payments – a global scan from a central bank perspective Panellists: Veerathai Santiprabhob, Bank of Thailand Reinaldo Le Grazie, Banco Central do Brasil Denis Beau, Banque de France Francois E. Groepe, South African Reserve Bank Moderator: Yves Mersch, European Central Bank 11:00 Coffee break 2 11:30 Keynote speech: The impact of digital innovation on banking and payments Chris Skinner, Fintech commentator and author 12:00 Panel discussion: How to foster innovation and integration in retail payments Panellists: Massimo Cirasino, World Bank Group Luisa Crisigiovanni, Altroconsumo Elie Beyrouthy, American Express Pierre Petit, European Central Bank Javier Santamaría, European Payments Council Moderator: Paolo Marullo Reedtz, Banca d’Italia 13:15 Lunch break 14:30 Academic session: On the way to a digital retail payments ecosystem – drivers and inhibitors Are instant retail payments becoming the new normal? Lola Hernández (co-authors Monika E. Hartmann, Mirjam Plooij and Quentin Vandeweyer), European Central Bank 3 The future of digital retail payments in Europe: a role for central bank issued crypto cash? Ruth Wandhöfer,
    [Show full text]
  • The BIS: Mission, Activities, Governance and Financial Results
    Organisation of the BIS as at 31 March 2017 Board of Directors Chairman of the Board Audit Banking & Risk Management Administrative Nomination Committee Committee Board Committee Committee Secretariat General Manager Legal Internal Service Audit Deputy General Manager Monetary & Banking General Financial Financial Secretariat Economic Department Department Stability Institute Stability Board Secretariat Risk Treasury Communications Economic Analysis Management International Asset Basel Committee Management Association Corporate Facility on Banking of Deposit Management Financial Stability Policy Supervision Insurers Banking Compliance* Operational Services Corporate Statistics & International Security Research Committee on the Association of Support Global Financial Insurance Financial System Supervisors Analysis Human Finance Resources Representative Office for the Committee on Americas Payments and Information Market Management Infrastructures Services Representative Office for Asia and the Pacific** Meeting Services Markets Committee Central Bank Governance Group Irving Fisher Committee * Direct access to the Audit Committee. *** AlsoDirect provides access banking to the services Audit to Committee. the region’s monetary authorities. ** Also provides banking services to the region’s monetary authorities. 136 BIS 87th Annual Report The BIS: mission, activities, governance and financial results The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) serves central banks in their pursuit of monetary and financial stability, fosters international cooperation in those areas and acts as a bank for central banks. In outline, the BIS pursues this mission by: • facilitating dialogue and collaboration among central banks and other authorities that are responsible for promoting financial stability; • conducting research on policy issues confronting central banks and financial supervisory authorities; • acting as a prime counterparty for central banks in their financial transactions; and • serving as an agent or trustee in connection with international financial operations.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Th JUNE 2018 Steigenberger Frankfurter Hof
    20th JUNE 2018 Steigenberger Frankfurter Hof Frankfurt am Main LONDON PARIS LONDON FRANKFURT AMSTERDAM ________ 09.00 LOCAL WELCOME AND OPENING WELCOME DR. NADER MALEKI Founder, FUTURE EUROPE Frankfurt am Main OPENING DR. ANDREAS DOMBRET Chairman, FUTURE EUROPE; MALEKI DOMBRET PRAET Former Member of the Executive Board, Deutsche Bundesbank Frankfurt am Main PARIS LONDON EUROPEAN KEYNOTE SPEECH (pre-recorded) T PETER PRAET Member of the Executive Board European Central Bank Frankfurt am Main PANEL DISCUSSION 1 FINANCING THE EU‘S ECONOMY What do for a fully-fledged Banking Union? · Capital Market Union (CMU) after Brexit · Level-playing field and future competition in a digital economy ·The return to conventional monetary policies and its implication · for financial markets ________ 09.15 LOCAL DISCUSSION IN FRANKFURT PHILIPPE ODDO CEO, ODDO BHF Aktiengesellschaft Frankfurt am Main MICHAEL RUEDIGER CEO, Deka, Frankfurt am Main HANS-JÜRGEN WALTER Partner, Deloitte ODDO RUEDIGER WALTER Financial Services Leader Germany Frankfurt am Main PROF. DR. JOACHIM WUERMELING Member of the Executive Board Deutsche Bundesbank Frankfurt am Main WUERMELING MODERATION PROF. DR. STEFAN COLLIGNON European Institute London School of Economics and Political Science, London ________ 10.00 EUROPEAN DISCUSSION TRANSMITTED TO ALL PARTIES FRANKFUR from Paris: AMSTERDAM LORENZO BINI SMAGHI Chairman of the Board of Directors from Amsterdam: Société Générale, Paris ROLAND BOEKHOUT Member of the Management Board BINI SMAGHI BOEKHOUT HUFELD Banking & Head of Market Leaders from Frankfurt: ING Group, Amsterdam FELIX HUFELD President, Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Bonn HARALD KAYSER Chairman of the Management Board PwC Europe SE (as of July 1st) KAYSER SHAFIK Frankfurt am Main from London: DAME MINOUCHE SHAFIK Director, London School of Economics and Political Science, London MODERATION DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Angela Merkel, Vorsitzende Der CDU Deutschlands 5
    Protokoll 17. Parteitag der CDU Deutschlands 1.–2. Dezember 2003, Leipzig Besser für die Menschen. Protokoll 17. Parteitag der CDU Deutschlands 1.–2. Dezember 2003, Leipzig 2 Protokoll 17. Parteitag der CDU Deutschlands 3 INHALT Seite Eröffnung: Dr. Angela Merkel, Vorsitzende der CDU Deutschlands 5 Wahl des Tagungspräsidiums 9 Beschlussfassung über die Tagesordnung 9 Bestätigung der Antragskommission 9 Wahl der Mandatsprüfungskommission 10 Wahl der Stimmzählkommission 10 Grußworte 10 ࡯ Wolfgang Tiefensee, Oberbürgermeister der Stadt Leipzig 10 ࡯ Prof. Dr. Georg Milbradt, Ministerpräsident des Landes Sachsen 12 ࡯ Pier Ferdinando Casini, Präsident des Abgeordnetenhauses der Republik Italien 15 ࡯ Wilfried Martens, Vorsitzender der Europäischen Volkspartei 17 Bericht der Vorsitzenden der CDU Deutschlands und Vorsitzenden der CDU/CSU-Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag Dr. Angela Merkel MdB 20 Aussprache zum Bericht der Vorsitzenden 45 Bericht der Mandatsprüfungskommission 73 Bericht des Vorsitzenden der Kommission „Soziale Sicherheit“ Bundespräsident a. D. Prof. Dr. Roman Herzog 74 Bericht des Generalsekretärs der CDU Deutschlands, zugleich Einführung in den Antrag des Bundesvorstandes der CDU Deutschlands „Deutschland fair ändern. Ein neuer Generationenvertrag für unser Land.“ Generalsekretär Laurenz Meyer 87 Aussprache und Beschlussfassung 100 Bericht des Vorsitzenden der CDU/CSU-Gruppe der EVP-Fraktion des Europäischen Parlaments Hartmut Nassauer MdEP 172 Antrag des Bundesvorstandes der CDU Deutschlands „Ein modernes Einkommensteuerrecht für
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Report on the Legal Personality of the European Union (21 November 2001)
    European Parliament Report on the legal personality of the European Union (21 November 2001) Caption: Whereas the three European Communities all have legal personality, and are therefore subjects of international public law, the European Union is simply a Union of States without legal personality of its own, and without the capacity to act at international level. On 21 November 2001, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of the European Parliament submits a report containing proposals for the simplification of the Union's structure and the recognition of its single, legal personality. Source: EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Committee on Constitutional Affairs. Report on the legal personality of the European Union (2001/2021(INI)), Final A5-0409/2001 (Rapporteur: Carlos Carnero González), PE 304.279. [s.l.]: 21.11.2001, 23 p. 23 p. (Session document 1999-2004). Copyright: All rights of reproduction, public communication, adaptation, distribution or dissemination via Internet, internal network or any other means are strictly reserved in all countries. The documents available on this Web site are the exclusive property of their authors or right holders. Requests for authorisation are to be addressed to the authors or right holders concerned. Further information may be obtained by referring to the legal notice and the terms and conditions of use regarding this site. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/european_parliament_report_on_the_legal_personality_of_the_european_union_21_november_ 2001-en-01623e94-fb13-4b30-b888-eb97908f00fe.html Publication date: 04/09/2012
    [Show full text]
  • High-Level Conference on Sustainable Finance It’S High Time for Sustainable Finance
    Representation in Germany High-level conference on sustainable finance It’s high time for sustainable finance Thursday, 22. February 2018 11:30 am - Registration and quick buffet lunch 12:30 - 6:00 pm - Conference European House Unter den Linden 78 10117 Berlin HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE FINANCE 3 Program 12:30 Welcome Note • Richard N. Kuehnel, Representative of the European Commission in Germany 12:45 Key Notes • Valdis Dombrovskis, Vice-President of the European Commission • Michael Meister, Parliamentary State Secretary at the Federal Ministry of Finance 13:15 - 14:15 Opening Debate – the policy context! With an introductory note about the key findings of the High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance by its Chairman, Christian Thimann, Senior Executive AXA Has sustainable finance reached the financial policy mainstream? • Will sustainable finance be a one-off topic or become a strategic issue for the Commission, the Finance Ministry and Central Banks? • Is “sustainable finance” just stepping in for a failing climate policy regime or are we moving to an integrated view of what is needed from the demand and supply side of sustainable capital to avoid catastrophic climate change? • No regret options only or 2 degree compatibility1 – what will govern the ambition level of (sustainable) financial policy? • Does Brexit increase the degrees of freedom for EU (financial) policy makers? Will we see German leadership – or are others like France taking the lead? • Valdis Dombrovskis, Vice-President of the European Commission • Marcel Fratzscher, President, DIW Berlin • Christian Thimann, Senior Executive AXA and Chairman of the High Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance • Joachim Wuermeling, Member of the Board, Deutsche Bundesbank Moderator: Kristina Jeromin, Head of Group Sustainability, Deutsche Börse Group 1 i.
    [Show full text]
  • Tepsanewsletter
    TEPSA Newsletter – February 2012 1 T E P S A N E W S L E T T E R FEBRUARY 2012 Editorial: J.P Jacqué Architects in the Kingdom Governance of the euro zone The Lisbon Treaty has attempted to establish mechanisms for the euro area governance, but the resistance of member states not sharing the common currency had greatly limited the progress in this field. It left a trace in the Protocol No. 14 that foresees informal meetings of euro zone ministers (Euro Group) chaired by an elected president. Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Junker has taken up this responsibility. The difficulties of managing the crisis demonstrated this structure to be insufficient. Tensions notably rose between the President of the Euro Group and the Heads of State and Government concerning the competent authority in charge of the economic management. Indeed, the direct intervention by the Heads of State or Government of the euro zone, meeting in special bodies, has been hardly approved by some finance ministers. Some have suggested creating a finance minister of the Union, yet this wouldn’t solve the problem. It was deemed necessary to restructure the system. This procedure was done in two stages. First of all, the declaration of Heads of State or Government of the euro area of 26 October 2011 established a complex pyramid-shaped structure, some aspects of which were subsequently specified by the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union. First, the existence of euro zone summits in which the Commission participates is confirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • SWP Research Paper 2008/RP 01, January 2008, 112 Pages
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Daniela Kietz and Volker Perthes (Eds.) The Potential of the Council Presidency An Analysis of Germany’s Chairmanship of the EU, 2007 RP 1 January 2008 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2008 SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3−4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Marie McGinley, Alexandra Wagner, and Markus Wagner (English version of SWP-Studie 24/07) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Conclusions 56 Holding all the Cards. Strong German Impulses for Police Co-operation 7 The Presidency in the Council System: Daniela Kietz Functions, Scope for Manoeuvre and Room for Improvement 64 The Profile of the German Presidency in the ENP: Daniela Kietz Regulated Stimulation and Complex Bargaining Kai-Olaf Lang 19 The ‘Berlin Declaration’— Trial Run for Negotiations on the 71 Efficiency and Its Costs: Constitutional Treaty The “Strategy for a New Partnership” Daniela Schwarzer with Central Asia Andrea Schmitz 25 Pruning, Plundering and Reconstructing. Work on the Constitutional Treaty 76 The German EU-Presidency’s Russia Dossier: Andreas Maurer between Rational Interests and Neighbourhood Conflicts 32 Lisbon in Berlin and Brussels— Rainer Lindner the Lisbon Strategy under the German Presidency 82 The Council Presidency and the Middle East Peter Becker Peace Process: Limited Scope for Action, Primacy of Diplomacy 38 Between Transatlantic Integration and the Muriel Asseburg Doha Round: The German Presidency as Impulse-Giver and Impartial Broker in Trade 88 The Council Presidency and EU Relations with Policy Making Latin America: Competent Management, Little Stormy-Annika Mildner Lasting Impact Jörg Husar / Günther Maihold 44 Far-reaching Decisions in Favour of an Integrated Energy and Climate Policy 95 Scope and Limitations of the Council Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Hoehne Recruitment EP & Europeanisation Sec Draft
    Recruitment of candidates within major German parties for EU elections: Changes in the recruitment patterns? Benjamin Höhne (University of Trier) Paper prepared for the 16 th SUMMER SCHOOL on EUROPEAN PARTIES AND PARTY SYSTEMS: ‘Parties & Democracy in the 21 st Century’, European University Institute (EUI), Florence, 10-21 September 2007. Session 4: Party Patronage, Clientelism, Corruption - Second and final draft - 1 Problem, approach and scope of research This paper relates to a process which is central for democratic political systems: the selection of candidates for parliaments. In addition to socialisation and communication, recruitment belongs to one of the three functions of each political system (Almond/Powell 1992: 10). Before the actual electoral act candidate selection processes take place. That means that there is a preliminary decision in a - mostly intra-party - decision-making process about the composition of the parliament which will be elected. Accordingly, Sternberger (1961: 11) divides elections in two phases: first, the nomination and presentation of one or more candidates and second, ensuing the final and binding choice of candidates by the voters. Depending on how recruitment works in a political system the results of the recruitment procedures have effects on the whole configuration of a political system. Processes, structures as well as fields of policy and their results are affected (Hazan/Rahat 2006). Thus, some time before the elections are held conditions are created which considerably codetermine the performance, legitimacy and durability of the political system. Parties as intermediary institutions take part in that process in a key position by executing their core function of recruitment of political actors (Katz 2001: 278; Norris 2006: 89) .
    [Show full text]