Home Truths Around Jupiter of Arizona Press)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Home Truths Around Jupiter of Arizona Press) 75 N._::_:ATIJ=RE'--'-VO=L=.305"--'I'-=SEP1E:::....:..:::MBE-==R--'-'198-'-'-3------BOOK REVIEWS------------~ published earlier this year by the University Home truths around Jupiter of Arizona Press). The book ends with three appendices, a C.T. Russell single list of references and an index. The first is a list of symbols and acronyms Physics of the Jovian Magnetosphere. which was very handy in reading the book. Edited by A.J. Dessler. The second, especially welcome, discusses Cambridge University Press: 1983. coordinate systems; Dessler's jovial Pp.540. £25, $29.50. disposition is apparent in this attempt to prevent Jovian mispositions. The third appendix lists selected physical parameters EARLY in the era of space exploration we often find in conference proceedings. of Jupiter and Io. Finally, there is the sent probes to the planets simply to dis­ These papers have been carefully reviewed index, essential for any book of this type cover what was there. Later, as the glamour and the contributors, perhaps with the but all too often forgotten. of space exploration faded somewhat, it editor's encouragement, have responded In short this is nola run-of-the-mill con­ became fashionable (or perhaps necessary) well. As a result the book is safe for first­ ference proceedings' volume, but a to rationalize our quest to understand the year graduate students and others uniniti­ valuable thorough account of what we planets in terms of improving our under­ ated to the sometimes intense rivalries that know-and don't know- about Jupiter's standing of the Earth. have developed as resources for such magnetosphere. 0 But how can you learn anything about research have declined. The book would, the terrestrial magnetosphere from however, have benefited from a discussion Jupiter? The Jovian magnetosphere has of satellite atmospheres and ionospheres C. T. Russell is Professor of Geophysics and volcanoes in it, spewing out sulphur which (such a review is to be found in The Satel­ Space Physics at the University of California, becomes ionized and spun up by the rapid lites of Jupiter, edited by D. Morrison and Los Angeles. rotation of the planet. This rapidly rotating plasma stretches the Jovian field so that the magnetosphere is more disc-like than reader should also consult the special spherical. By contrast centrifugal force in Venusian probes Venus issues of the journal Icarus dated the terrestrial plasma has an insignificant August and November 1982. effect on the position of the magnetopause. Lionel Wilson A few of the papers in this volume are Jupiter emits powerful radio waves, too, devoted to useful historical summaries; the and releases energetic electrons which in Venus. rest are divided 14:6:5 among the at­ some energy ranges dominate solar elec­ Edited by D.M. Hunten, L. Colin, T.M. mosphere, ionosphere and surface, respec­ trons at the Earth many AU away. In Donahue and V.I. Moroz. tively. This emphasizes the leading role that addition to this, it has radiation belts which University of Arizona Press: 1983. studies of the atmosphere have played so Pp.l,l43. $49.95. roast our spacecraft if they linger too close far in the investigation of the evolution of to the planet. Venus, and underlines the great amount of We do learn of course. We learn basic CONSIDERING its similarity in size to the work remaining to be done on the chemical plasma physics; we gain insight into how Earth and its obvious importance in under­ and physical structure of the lithosphere, astrophysical plasmas may behave; we gain standing the origin and evolution of the the thermal state of the interior, and the an appreciation of processes which operate silicate planets, it is particularly unfor­ nature of the tectonic regimes that repre­ on less grand scales in the terrestrial mag­ tunate that Venus is so well equipped (by its sent the interaction between these two sys­ netosphere. And there are some processes opaque, dense, hot atmosphere) to hide its tems. Such studies are progressing steadily that operate almost identically on the two surface from our probes. However, tech­ as a synthesis takes place between the sur­ planets, such as ELF and VLF emissions. nological persistence pays off. To date, a face chemical analyses made by the soft­ On Earth, we cannot easily determine how total of thirteen Soviet and five American landers Veneras 13 and 14 and the radar much man's activity on the surface of the missions have visited Venus; the combined topography, roughness and dielectric cons­ planet affects the generation of these emis­ efforts have resulted in fifteen surface tant data obtained by the Pioneer Venus sions. The observations of Jupiter made so landers (some soft, some hard), seven fly­ Orbiter and by Earth-based radar measure­ far indicate that these waves do, in fact, bys and three orbiters which has led to a ments. However, one feels that it will be originate spontaneously in the plasma. steady increase in our knowledge of the some time before our understanding of the There is, however, still much to be planet. surface and interior matches that of the at­ learned, both from Jupiter and about it. A conference held in California in mosphere. Indeed the very structure of The Physics of November 1981 provided the opportunity With the inclusion of a paper summariz­ the Jovian Magnetosphere reflects the im­ for a detailed review of Venus studies (see ing the Venera 13 and 14 measurements, maturity of the discipline. There are eight Nature 296, 13-20; 1982), and this book made after the conference, this volume has observational papers centred around consists of much of the material presented the distinction of being a particularly up­ specific measurement techniques at the meeting together with numerous to-date representation of our knowledge of (magnetic fields, low energy particles, papers submitted later by Soviet authors. Venus. However, two more Soviet probes radio emissions, etc.) and four papers in As a result, the collection gives a well­ are even now en route to the planet, and the which theorists discuss their favourite balanced impression of the total effort be­ US Venus Radar Mapper probe is expected ideas. In a more mature phase of our ing directed at Venus. It is interesting that a to provide a very great increase in our understanding, such a book would have a number of the papers are co-authored by knowledge of the surface when it begins series of articles discussing physical Eastern-bloc and Western scientists, sym­ measurements in mid-1988. So with respect processes each of which covered all the bolic of an encouragingly high level of to the surface, we can assume that the best relevant observations and theories. But we scientific collaboration. So great has been is yetto come. 0 won't reach that stage for quite some time. the upsurge of interest in Venus, par­ In the meantime this book will have to ticularly since the arrival in orbit of the US suffice. The authors have written sound, Pioneer Venus Orbiter in 1978, that the Lionel Wilson is Head of the Planetary Sciences complete articles, not just the extended conference volume could not find room for Section of the Department of Environmental versions of oral presentations that you all of the papers submitted- the interested Sciences at Lancaster University. © 1983 Nature Publishing Group.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Jjmonl 1710.Pmd
    alactic Observer John J. McCarthy Observatory G Volume 10, No. 10 October 2017 The Last Waltz Cassini’s final mission and dance of death with Saturn more on page 4 and 20 The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 www.mccarthyobservatory.org Allan Ostergren Website Development JJMO Staff Marc Polansky Technical Support It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory Bob Lambert has established itself as a significant educational and recreational resource within the western Connecticut Dr. Parker Moreland community. Steve Barone Jim Johnstone Colin Campbell Carly KleinStern Dennis Cartolano Bob Lambert Route Mike Chiarella Roger Moore Jeff Chodak Parker Moreland, PhD Bill Cloutier Allan Ostergren Doug Delisle Marc Polansky Cecilia Detrich Joe Privitera Dirk Feather Monty Robson Randy Fender Don Ross Louise Gagnon Gene Schilling John Gebauer Katie Shusdock Elaine Green Paul Woodell Tina Hartzell Amy Ziffer In This Issue INTERNATIONAL OBSERVE THE MOON NIGHT ...................... 4 SOLAR ACTIVITY ........................................................... 19 MONTE APENNINES AND APOLLO 15 .................................. 5 COMMONLY USED TERMS ............................................... 19 FAREWELL TO RING WORLD ............................................ 5 FRONT PAGE ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Planets 1- 4 from the Sun Mercury in Sight
    Terrestrial Planets 1- 4 from the Sun Image courtesy: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Terrestrial_planet_size_comparisons_edit.jpg First ever ‘whole Earth’ picture from deep space, taken by Bill Anders on Apollo 8 Apollo 8 crew, Bill Anders centre: courtesy Nasa Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars are four The Earth is just a planet astonishingly different planets Mercury and Venus have only been seen in any detail within the last 30 years Mercury in sight Mercury Mercury is like the Earth inside and the Moon outside Courtesy NASA (Mariner 10) Mercury has had a cooling and bombardment history Mercury is visible only soon after the setting similar to the moon sun or shortly before dawn It appears as cratered lava the Mariner 10 probe (1974/75) is the source of most information about Mercury – Messenger, launched 2004, with scarps first flypast in 2008 and orbit Mercury in 2011. ESA’s Its rocks are Earth-like BepiColombo, to be launched in 2013 Mariner 10 image Messenger images Messenger image ↑ Double-ringed crater – a Mercury feature courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/S trom02.jpg ← Courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gal lery/sciencePhotos/pics/EN010 8828161M.jpg Courtesy: http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/pics/Prockter06.jpg Messenger image Mercury Close-up Mercury’s topography was formed under stronger The gravity than on the Moon caloris The Caloris basin is an impact crater ~1400 km across, basin is the beneath which is thought to be a dense mass large 2 Mercury’s rotation period is exactly /3 of its orbital circular period of 87.97 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Venus Geophysical Explorer
    Destination Venus: Science, Technology and Mission Architectures Overview: Purpose of Workshop James Cutts, Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology International Planetary Probe Workshop 2016 June 11, 2016 Outline • Venus in a historical context • A Brief History of Robotic Exploration of Venus • Future Venus Mission Opportunities • International Collaboration • Venus Exploration Assessment Group (VEXAG) • Objectives of this course • Conclusions IPPW-13 Short Course-1 Venus throughout history • Brightest planet in the sky – The morning star – The evening star • Mythology and ancient astronomers – Mayan –Babylonian • Age of the telescope – Discovery of the first planetary atmosphere – Transits of sun – the distance between Earth and Sun [Hall IPPW-13 Short Course-2 International Collaboration for Venus Explorattion-3 Venus in a Historical Context and Popular Culture Lucky Starr and the Oceans of Venus, Juvenile Sci Fi Novel, 1955 The Mekon Ruler of Venus, British SF Comic Book, 1958 Queen of Outer Space, Movie, 1958 with Zsa New York Times Zsa Gabor 11/16/1928 IPPW-13 Short Course-4 A brief history of Venus Robotic Exploration • The first spacecraft to reach Venus was Mariner 2, a flyby mission in 1962. • The Soviet Union played the dominant role in Venus Exploration for the next 20 years with a series of orbiters, landers and the VeGa (Venus-Halley) mission in 1985 which also deployed two balloons at Venus. • From 1989-1994, the NASA Magellan mission produced detailed radar maps of the surface of Venus following earlier less capable US and Soviet radar missions. • In 2005, the ESA Venus Express mission was launched and for the last decade has investigated the atmosphere of Venus.
    [Show full text]
  • Envision – Front Cover
    EnVision – Front Cover ESA M5 proposal - downloaded from ArXiV.org Proposal Name: EnVision Lead Proposer: Richard Ghail Core Team members Richard Ghail Jörn Helbert Radar Systems Engineering Thermal Infrared Mapping Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute for Planetary Research, Imperial College London, United Kingdom DLR, Germany Lorenzo Bruzzone Thomas Widemann Subsurface Sounding Ultraviolet, Visible and Infrared Spectroscopy Remote Sensing Laboratory, LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, University of Trento, Italy France Philippa Mason Colin Wilson Surface Processes Atmospheric Science Earth Science and Engineering, Atmospheric Physics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom University of Oxford, United Kingdom Caroline Dumoulin Ann Carine Vandaele Interior Dynamics Spectroscopy and Solar Occultation Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, de Nantes, Belgium France Pascal Rosenblatt Emmanuel Marcq Spin Dynamics Volcanic Gas Retrievals Royal Observatory of Belgium LATMOS, Université de Versailles Saint- Brussels, Belgium Quentin, France Robbie Herrick Louis-Jerome Burtz StereoSAR Outreach and Systems Engineering Geophysical Institute, ISAE-Supaero University of Alaska, Fairbanks, United States Toulouse, France EnVision Page 1 of 43 ESA M5 proposal - downloaded from ArXiV.org Executive Summary Why are the terrestrial planets so different? Venus should be the most Earth-like of all our planetary neighbours: its size, bulk composition and distance from the Sun are very similar to those of Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Venus Exploration Themes: September 2011
    Venus Exploration Themes Adjunct to Venus Exploration Goals and Objectives 2011 September 2011 Fifty Years of Venus Missions Venus Exploration Vignettes Technologies for Venus Exploration Front cover is a collage showing Venus at radar wavelength, the Magellan spacecraft, and artists’ concepts for a Venus Balloon, the Venus In Situ Explorer, and the Venus Mobile Explorer. (Collage prepared by Tibor Balint) Perspective view of Ishtar Terra, one of two main highland regions on Venus. The smaller of the two, Ishtar Terra, is located near the north pole and rises over 11 km above the mean surface level. Courtesy NASA/JPL–Caltech. Venus Exploration Themes: September 2011 Prepared as an adjunct to the Venus Exploration Goals and Objectives document to preserve extracts from the October 2009 Venus Exploration Pathways document. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iii Fifty Years of Venus Missions ....................................................................................................... 1 Venus Exploration Vignettes .......................................................................................................... 3 Vignette 1: Magellan ................................................................................................................... 3 Vignette 2: Experiencing Venus by Air: The Advantages of Balloon-Borne In Situ Exploration ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Typical Spacecraft Contents
    Appendix A: Typical Spacecraft This appendix contains descriptions and images of a dozen spacecraft selected from the many that are currently operating in interplanetary space or have successfully completed their missions, plus one that is now preparing for launch. Included is at least one representative of each of the eight spacecraft classifications described in Chapter 7 (see page 243). The scheme of limiting coverage of each spacecraft to a two-page spread in this appendix allows the reader to easily compare the various craft, their specifications, their missions, and their classifications, but it does not allow room to list all of a spacecraft’s activities, discoveries and questions raised; indeed entire books can and have been written on each. Complete profiles of these and other spacecraft are, how- ever, readily available at a single web site: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary. Contents: Spacecraft Classification Page Voyager Flyby 294 New Horizons Flyby 296 Spitzer Observatory 298 Chandra Observatory 300 Galileo Orbiter 302 Cassini Orbiter 304 Messenger Orbiter 306 Huygens Atmospheric 308 Phoenix Lander 310 Mars Science Laboratory Rover (launch: 2009) 312 Deep Impact Penetrator 314 Deep Space 1 Engineering 316 294 Appendix A: Typical Spacecraft The Voyager Spacecraft Fig. A.1. Each Voyager spacecraft measures about 8.5 meters from the end of the science boom across the spacecraft to the end of the RTG boom. The magnetometer boom is 13 meters long. Courtesy NASA/JPL. Classification: Flyby spacecraft Mission: Encounter giant outer planets and explore heliosphere Named: For their journeys Summary: The two similar spacecraft flew by Jupiter and Saturn.
    [Show full text]
  • DATA CATALOG ERIE for PACE CIENCE and APPLICATIO FIGHT MI ION Volume La De Criptio of Planetary and Heliocentric Pacecraft and Inve Tigation
    NASA-TM-8487719830007055 National Space Science Data Center/ 82-21 World Data Center A For Rockets and Satellites DATA CATALOG ERIE FOR PACE CIENCE AND APPLICATIO FIGHT MI ION Volume lA De criptio of Planetary and Heliocentric pacecraft and Inve tigation September 1982 lIB~ARY COpy !\ CJV 19 1982 LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER LIBRARY, NASA H fy1 ~TONJ VIRGINIA Categories of Spacecraft Used in This Series PLANETARY AND HELIOCENTRIC This category includes probe to the various planets of the solar system and probes designed to make measurements of the characteristics of interplanetary space. Included are also the probes which will pass out of the solar system into interstellar space. METEOROLOGY AND TERRESTRIAL APPLICATIONS This category includes geocentric spacecraft whose primary mission is to make remote sensing measurements of the earth and its atmosphere. Spacecraft which carry instrumentation to make geodesy and gravimetry measurements are also included. Technology, engineering, and communi­ cations spacecraft or investigations are not included because NSSDC does not archive such data. ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS, AND SOLAR PHYSICS This category consists of scientific satellites designed to conduct investigations of the sun, stellar objects, nonstellar sources, and interstellar phenomena. These satellites are geocentric except for the selenocentric RAE-B. GEOSTATIONARY AND HIGH-ALTITUDE SCIENTIFIC This category includes those satellites designed to conduct investigations of the characteristics of near-earth space from orbits with apogees near geostationary altitude and higher. Three of the spacecraft are seleno­ centric. Communications satellites are not included because NSSDC does not archive such data. LOW- AND MEDIUM-ALTITUDE SCIENTIFIC This category includes those spacecraft whose apogees are well below geostationary altitude and whose primary purpose is to conduct investigations in the near-earth environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Venera-D: Expanding Our Horizon of Terrestrial Planet Climate and Geology Through the Comprehensive Exploration of Venus
    Venera-D: Expanding our Horizon of Terrestrial Planet Climate and Geology through the Comprehensive Exploration of Venus Venera-D Joint Science Definition Team Authors and Study Participants Name Institution Co-Chairs D. Senske Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA L. Zasova Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia Joint Science Definition Team Members N. Ignatiev Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia O. Korablev Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia N. Eismont Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia I. Lomakin Lavochkin Association, Moscow, Russia M. Gerasimov Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia M. Ivanov Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia M. Martynov Lavochkin Association, Moscow, Russia I. Khatuntsev Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia S. Limaye University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI K. Lea Jessup Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO T. Economou University of Chicago, Chicago, IL L. Esposito University of Colorado, LASP, Boulder, CO A. Ocampo NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC The Venera-D JSDT would like to thank and acknowledge the support and contribution to this report provided by: Oleg Vaisberg (IKI RAS) for his contribution to the “Solar Wind-Venus Interaction and Venus Magnetosphere” discussion; Alexander Kosov (IKI RAS) for evaluating the scenario and calculating the volume of data that could be transmitted from the Lander to the Orbiter; and Alexander Simonov (Lavochkin Association) for trajectory calculations. The cost information
    [Show full text]
  • Power Beaming for Long Life Venus Surface Missions
    Power Beaming for Long Life Venus Surface Missions NIAC Phase I Final Report Erik J. Brandon, Ratnakumar Bugga, Jonathan Grandidier, Jeff L. Hall, Joel A. Schwartz and Sanjay Limaye March 9, 2020 ©2020 CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. GOVERNMENT SPONSORSHIP ACKNOWLEDGED. NIAC 2019 Phase I Power Beaming for Long Life Venus Surface Missions TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary and Major Findings ................................................................................................................. 2 2 Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Venus Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Venus Exploration Goals ................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.2 Future Exploration Mission Concepts .............................................................................................. 3 2.2 Limitations of Current Venus Surface Power Options .................................................................................. 4 2.2.1 Primary and Rechargeable Batteries ............................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Solar Arrays ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Russian Planetary Lander Missions by Tibor Balint, Deep Space Mission Architecture Group, 311B, NASA-JPL December 19, 2002
    Summary of Russian Planetary Lander Missions By Tibor Balint, Deep Space Mission Architecture Group, 311B, NASA-JPL December 19, 2002 The information presented in the table and below, including the pictures were obtained from various Internet web sites, including • http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/ • http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lunae6.htm • http://vsm.host.ru/r_photos.htm • http://www.skyrocket.de/space/index_frame.htm?http://www.skyrocket.de/space/ doc_sdat/mars-73-lander.htm • http://www.terra.es/personal/heimdall/eng/urss.htm Summary Table Year Type / Comment Method EDL Method Venus Venera 3 1965 Venus Lander Impacted Venus, Parachute FAILED Contact Lost Venera 4 1967 Venus Probe Failed at altitude 24.96 Parachute FAILED km Venera 5 1969 Venus Probe During parachute Parachute FAILED descent data was transmitted from the atmosphere for 53 minutes before failure Venera 6 1969 Venus Probe During parachute Parachute FAILED descent data was transmitted from the atmosphere for 51 minutes before failure Venera 7 1970 Venus Lander 35 minutes of data Aerobraking then PARTIAL during descent, 23 min. parachute FAILURE weak signal from the surface (1st man made object to return data after landing on another planet) Venera 8 1972 Venus Lander Data during descent, Aerobraking/ D2.5m plus 50 minutes after parachute at 60km landing 1 Year Type / Comment Method EDL Method Venera 9 1975 Venus Orbiter Operated for 53 Protective and Lander minutes after landing hemispherical shell/ three parachutes/ disk shaped drag brake/ metal, compressible doughnut-shaped landing cushion Venera 10 1975 Venus Orbiter Operated for 65 See Venera 9 and Lander minutes after landing Venera 11 1978 Venus Lander Transmitted data after Aerodynamic ~/ touchdown for 95 parachute ~/ minutes, until it moved atmospheric braking/ out of range with Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Earth a CHRONICLE of DEEP SPACE EXPLORATION, 1958–2016
    Beyond Earth A CHRONICLE OF DEEP SPACE EXPLORATION, 1958–2016 Asif A. Siddiqi Beyond Earth A CHRONICLE OF DEEP SPACE EXPLORATION, 1958–2016 by Asif A. Siddiqi NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2018-4041 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Siddiqi, Asif A., 1966– author. | United States. NASA History Division, issuing body. | United States. NASA History Program Office, publisher. Title: Beyond Earth : a chronicle of deep space exploration, 1958–2016 / by Asif A. Siddiqi. Other titles: Deep space chronicle Description: Second edition. | Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Communications, NASA History Division, [2018] | Series: NASA SP ; 2018-4041 | Series: The NASA history series | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017058675 (print) | LCCN 2017059404 (ebook) | ISBN 9781626830424 | ISBN 9781626830431 | ISBN 9781626830431?q(paperback) Subjects: LCSH: Space flight—History. | Planets—Exploration—History. Classification: LCC TL790 (ebook) | LCC TL790 .S53 2018 (print) | DDC 629.43/509—dc23 | SUDOC NAS 1.21:2018-4041 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017058675 Original Cover Artwork provided by Ariel Waldman The artwork titled Spaceprob.es is a companion piece to the Web site that catalogs the active human-made machines that freckle our solar system. Each space probe’s silhouette has been paired with its distance from Earth via the Deep Space Network or its last known coordinates. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. ISBN 978-1-62683-043-1 90000 9 781626 830431 For my beloved father Dr.
    [Show full text]