18-253 Buss Rutetabell & Linjerutekart
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Rb-Sr Age Study from the Mos Jøen Unit, Helgeland Nappe Complex, and Its Bearing on the Timing of Tectonometamorphic Events W
A Rb-Sr age study from the Mosjøen unit, Helgeland Nappe Complex, and its bearing on the timing of tectonometamorphic events within the Uppermost Allochthon, Central Scandinavian Caledonides, Norway B. O. TØRUOBAKKEN & M. MICKELSON Tørudbakken, B. O. & Mickelson, M.: A Rb-Sr age study from the Mosjøen unit, Helgeland Nappe Complex and its bearing on the timing of tectonometamorphic events within the Uppermost Al lochthon, CentralScandinavian Caledonides, Norway.Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 66, pp. 263- 270. Oslo 1986. ISSN 0029-196X. The Mosjøen unit within the Helgeland Nappe Complex is made up of a polydeformed supracrustal sequence consisting mainly of greenschists, greenstones and layers of calcite and dolomite marbles, which have been intruded by large masses of igneous rocks ranging in composition from gabbroic to granitic. The main structural elements and the metamorphic maximum are related to the 02- deformation. The Mosjøen gabbro, yielding an igneous Rb-Sr mineral isochron age of 420 ± 8 m.y. (10 = .70412 ± .00003), was emplaced during the 02 event. A 433 ± 11 m.y. total rock Rb-Sr isochron was obtained for a granitic dyke crosscutting the 02 structures. The geochronological data are inter preted to indicate a Silurian age for the main tectonometamorphic event (02) in the Mosjøen unit. Previous geochronological studies from other parts of the Uppermost AUochthon demonstrate strong early Caledonian (late Cambrian to early Ordovician) metamorphism and deformation prior to Sil urian deformation. The present tectonostratigraphic sequence within the Uppermost Allochthon was established during the main Caledonian thrusting event in the late Silurian to early Oevonian. B. O. Tørudbakken & M. -
Hagamovegen 22 Eier: Rune Elvenes Boligtype: Enebolig Boligen Ligger Ved Drevvatnet, Ca
Velkommen til Aktiv Eiendomsmegling Vi ble etablert i 1985 og er en av Norges største eiendomsmeglerkjeder, målt i antall formidlinger. Aktiv Eiendomsmegling tilbyr tjenester innen salg og kjøp av bolig og fritidseiendom, utleievirksomhet, prosjektmegling og næringsmegling. Vi får frem det beste i en bolig slik at den blir viktig for de riktige kjøperne. Vi megler frem dine verdier. Hagamovegen Enebolig i landlige 22/Vefsn omgivelser, Drevvatne 92 Eiendomsmegler MNEF, daglig leder Rita Aanes Mobil 97 75 71 55 Email [email protected] Faks 75 17 77 75 Aktiv Eiendomsmegling Helgeland C. M. Havigs gate 27 8656 Mosjøen Nøkkelinformasjon Enebolig m/garasje Prisant.: 650 000 + omk. Landlige omgivelser. Omkostn.: Ca. 31 604 Totalt inkl. 681 604 omkostninger: Velkommen til visning i Hagamovegen 22 Eier: Rune Elvenes Boligtype: Enebolig Boligen ligger ved Drevvatnet, ca. 40 km nord for forretningssentrum i Eierform: Selveier Mosjøen. Lokal butikk og grendestue i område, ca. 10 km til barne- og Byggeår: 1955 ungdomsskole. Det er foretatt en rekke rehabiliteringsarbeider på boligen i løpet av de Bra/P-rom: 92 m²/ 86 m² senere årene, men det må påregnes ytterligere oppussings- og Gnr./bnr.: 212/33 rehabiliteringsarbeider såvel innvendig som utvendig på bygningen. Tomtetype: Festet tomt Tomteareal: 358 m² Hilsen Oppdragsnr.: 50190055 Rita Aanes Hagamovegen 22 1 Innhold Velkommen 1 Innhold 3 Standard 3 Beliggenhet 3 Beskrivelse av eiendommen 4 Intervju med selger 10 Offentlige forhold 11 Prisantydning inkl. omkostninger 12 Øvrige kjøpsforhold 12 Nabolagsprofil 26 Plantegning 29 Boligkjøperforsikring 34 Forbrukerinformasjon om budgiving 35 Budskjema 36 2 Hagamovegen 22 Hagamovegen 22 INNHOLD annet er isolering i yttervegger innvendig som utvendig på utskiftet, yttervegger etterisolert og bygningen. -
The Norwegian Millstone Landscape Millstones Are Among the Most Widespread and Abundant Artifacts from the Past
The Norwegian Millstone Landscape Millstones are among the most widespread and abundant artifacts from the past. They can be seen at farms, in gardens, in dry-stone walls and along streams long after the mill itself has disappeared. We intuitively know that there are many stories behind these well-crafted objects that have been so central in mankind’s history; however, most of these stories are lost. Particularly this applies to the ‘life’ of the millstone before it was put to use: the history of extensive quarry landscapes, craftsmanship, quality measures, millstone trade – aspects that collectively form a rich cultural landscape. This project seeks to shed new light on the physical and historical aspects of these multi- faceted landscapes through comprehensive surveys and interdisciplinary research. 1. Relevance to the call The Norwegian Millstone Landscape focuses on the historical narrative of quarrying, processing and trade of specific stone resources crucial to the production of the most fundamental food, flour. The shaping of extensive cultural landscapes by millstone quarrying provides a rich historical re- cord of the social, economic and political processes that surrounded food production for over 1500 years. Moreover, the consumption of millstones at local, regional and international scales represents conduits in the evolution of trade and social networks that grew around the millstone quarrying in- dustry, and that define an ‘extended millstone landscape’. Today, the socio-cultural and economic values of these millstone landscapes are at best greatly underestimated or, at worst, completely un- known. Undertaken by an interdisciplinary research team comprising the disciplines of geology, archaeology, history and landscape geography, this project addresses the proposal call by develop- ing methods for characterisation and reconstruction of the Norwegian millstone landscapes as a narrative that links the past with the present in a common heritage. -
Gemstones and Geosciences in Space and Time Digital Maps to the “Chessboard Classification Scheme of Mineral Deposits”
Earth-Science Reviews 127 (2013) 262–299 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Gemstones and geosciences in space and time Digital maps to the “Chessboard classification scheme of mineral deposits” Harald G. Dill a,b,⁎,BertholdWeberc,1 a Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, P.O. Box 510163, D-30631 Hannover, Germany b Institute of Geosciences — Gem-Materials Research and Economic Geology, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Becherweg 21, D-55099 Mainz, Germany c Bürgermeister-Knorr Str. 8, D-92637 Weiden i.d.OPf., Germany article info abstract Article history: The gemstones, covering the spectrum from jeweler's to showcase quality, have been presented in a tripartite Received 27 April 2012 subdivision, by country, geology and geomorphology realized in 99 digital maps with more than 2600 mineral- Accepted 16 July 2013 ized sites. The various maps were designed based on the “Chessboard classification scheme of mineral deposits” Available online 25 July 2013 proposed by Dill (2010a, 2010b) to reveal the interrelations between gemstone deposits and mineral deposits of other commodities and direct our thoughts to potential new target areas for exploration. A number of 33 categories Keywords: were used for these digital maps: chromium, nickel, titanium, iron, manganese, copper, tin–tungsten, beryllium, Gemstones fl Country lithium, zinc, calcium, boron, uorine, strontium, phosphorus, zirconium, silica, feldspar, feldspathoids, zeolite, Geology amphibole (tiger's eye), olivine, pyroxenoid, garnet, epidote, sillimanite–andalusite, corundum–spinel−diaspore, Geomorphology diamond, vermiculite–pagodite, prehnite, sepiolite, jet, and amber. Besides the political base map (gems Digital maps by country) the mineral deposit is drawn on a geological map, illustrating the main lithologies, stratigraphic Chessboard classification scheme units and tectonic structure to unravel the evolution of primary gemstone deposits in time and space. -
Administrative and Statistical Areas English Version – SOSI Standard 4.0
Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 Administrative and statistical areas Norwegian Mapping Authority [email protected] Norwegian Mapping Authority June 2009 Page 1 of 191 Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 1 Applications schema ......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Administrative units subclassification ....................................................................................7 1.1 Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 CityDistrict ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.2 CityDistrictBoundary ................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3 SubArea ................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 BasicDistrictUnit ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1.5 SchoolDistrict ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.6 <<DataType>> SchoolDistrictId ............................................................................... 17 1.1.7 SchoolDistrictBoundary ........................................................................................... -
Ny Kommune Nord-Helgeland
Ny kommune Nord-Helgeland Ole Petter Rundhaug 230915 Ny kommune Nord-Helgeland INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE Innholdsfortegnelse ........................................................................ 1 FORORD ........................................................................................ 3 1. Areal og befolkning ............................................................ 4 2. Sammendrag ....................................................................... 5 3. Bakgrunn for utredningen ................................................ 12 3.1Kommunenes utredningsplikt ........................................................................ 12 3.2 Andre alternativ kommunene har ønsket å utrede ........................................ 13 4. Prosjektplan og metode .................................................... 13 4.1 Prosjektplan kommuneutredning .................................................................. 13 4.2 Valg av metode .............................................................................................. 16 5. Historikk og status kommunestruktur .............................. 17 5.1 Sentrale utviklingstrekk ................................................................................. 17 5.2 Christiansen-utvalget ..................................................................................... 19 5.3 Frivillighetslinja ............................................................................................ 20 6. Framtidens kommunestruktur .......................................... 20 6.1 Nasjonalt -