DOCSLIB.ORG

Cloudbreak SRE Invertebrate Fauna

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cloudbreak SRE Invertebrate Fauna NOVEMBER 2010 FORTESCUE METALS GROUP CLOUDBREAK SHORT‐RANGE ENDEMIC DESKTOP ASSESSMENT This page has been left blank intentionally FORTESCUE METALS GROUP CLOUDBREAK SHORT‐RANGE ENDEMIC DESKTOP ASSESSMENT Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer/s Date Distributed Name Date To A C. Hall L. Roque‐Albelo 10 08 2010 1 L. Roque‐Albelo E. Fox 23 08 2010 L. Roque‐Albelo Les Egerton 24 08 2010 2 L. Roque‐Albelo 30 09 2010 L. Roque‐Albelo Les Egerton 30 09 2010 3 L. Roque‐Albelo 10 11 2010 L. Roque‐Albelo Les Egerton 10 11 2010 ecologia Environment (2010). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Fortescue Metals Group Ltd and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Fortescue Metals Group Ltd and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] November 2010 i Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND............................................................................................................8 1.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................8 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................................10 1.4 SHORT RANGE ENDEMIC FAUNA: A REVIEW ..........................................................................11 2 PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 CLIMATE ..................................................................................................................................14 2.2 VEGETATION ...........................................................................................................................15 2.3 LAND SYSTEMS........................................................................................................................15 2.4 BIOGEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................16 3 METHODS....................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 SRE STATUS .............................................................................................................................22 3.2 WAM DATABASE SEARCH .......................................................................................................22 3.3 NATUREMAP DATABASE SEARCH ...........................................................................................22 3.4 PREVIOUS SRE SURVEYS..........................................................................................................22 3.5 SRE HABITATS DETERMINATION.............................................................................................23 4 RESULTS.......................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANT SRE FAUNA..............................................................................24 4.2 WAM DATABASE SEARCH .......................................................................................................28 4.3 PREVIOUS SURVEYS.................................................................................................................29 4.4 POTENTIAL SRE........................................................................................................................31 4.5 SRE INVERTEBRATE HABITATS ................................................................................................33 5 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................... 36 6 STUDY TEAM................................................................................................................... 38 7 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................... 40 November 2010 ii Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment TABLES Table 2.1 – Beard Vegetation Types of Cloudbreak Survey Area...........................................................15 Table 2.2 – Land Systems of the Project Area. .......................................................................................16 Table 4.1 – DEC Priority Fauna Categories .............................................................................................24 Table 4.2 – Results from WAM Database Search...................................................................................28 Table 4.3 – Results from Previous Surveys Within and Around the Project Area..................................29 FIGURES Figure 1.1 – Location of the Project Area in Relation to the Pilbara Region............................................9 Figure 2.1 – Climatic Summary Data (Newman Airport) (BOM 2010)....................................................14 Figure 2.2 – Vegetation of the Survey Area............................................................................................18 Figure 2.3 – Land Systems of the Project Area.......................................................................................19 Figure 2.4 – Biogeographic Regions of the Project Area ........................................................................20 Figure 4.1 – SRE and Potential SRE Species Recorded within the Project Area .....................................26 November 2010 iii Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment ACRONYMS List all acronyms used in the report here. Format alphabetically as follows: DEC Department of Environment and Conservation EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1950 SRE Short‐Range Endemic WAM Western Australian Museum November 2010 iv Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally November 2010 v Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study area is located in the Pilbara, approximately 120 km north‐west of Newman along the northern margin of Fortescue Marsh. Included in this project area is the Cloudbreak mine, which is part of Fortescue Metal Group’s Chichester Operations. Fortescue Metal Group commissioned ecologia Environment to undertake a baseline biological desktop study of the Short Range Endemic (SRE) invertebrate fauna of the Cloudbreak project area as part of the environmental approval process. The primary objective of this study was to provide sufficient information with which to assess previous surveys undertaken at the area and to guide further survey work at Cloudbreak. The paucity of knowledge and lack of extensive invertebrate survey work in the area of Cloudbreak prompted database searches of the eastern Pilbara region between: 21°55’08” S to 22°54’32”S, and 118°48’40”E to 120°02’52”E. Families and genera known to contain SRE species were targeted from this area in searches of the Malacology and Terrestrial Invertebrate Databases of the Western Australian Museum. Three species of conservation significance listed by DEC are potentially occurring on the Project Area. Search results and literature records from projects undertaken around the Project Area identified 38 species considered potential SRE invertebrates including Trapdoor spiders, Opilionids, Pseudoscorpions, Scorpions, Millipedes, Centipedes, Isopods and Snails. Very few SRE invertebrate groups have been recognised in previous surveys at the Project Area. Two possible explanations for this are identified: Insufficient sampling and environmental degradation, which independently, or in conjunction would explain the absence of short‐range endemic groups. Additional surveys are recommended to augment the survey work previously undertaken and collect information about the distribution and habitat associations of the SRE invertebrates. November 2010 vi Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally November 2010 vii Fortescue Metals Group Cloudbreak SRE Desktop Assessment 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) holds a number of mining tenements that cover iron ore resources in the Pilbara region of Western Australia and has commenced operation of the Pilbara Iron Ore and Infrastructure Project. Included in this project is the Cloudbreak mine, which is part of Fortescue’s Chichester Operations, and is located approximately 120 km north‐west of Newman along the northern margin of the Fortescue Marsh (Figure 1.1). As part of the environmental approvals process, this document provides a desktop Short‐Range Endemic (SRE) invertebrate fauna assessment of the Cloudbreak Project Area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Question on Notice
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Question On Notice Thursday, 13 February 2020 2799. Hon Robin Chappie to the Minister for Re ional Development representing the Minister for Water I refer to the issue of water consumption in the Pilbara, and I ask: (a) for each mine in the Pilbara, by company and location, and for the most recently completed reporting year, would the Minister please table: (i) the licensed water abstraction amounts, inclusive of mine dewatering; (ii) the licensed aquifer reinjection rates; (iii) the actual e traction rates; and (i ) the actual reinjection rates; (b) what is the total water consumption of the Pilbara region, inclusive of mine dewatering but exclusive of aquifer reinjection and residential consumption; (c) split out by year and dating back to the beginning of the 2010 reporting year, what is the total amount the Water Corporation has earned in fixed and variable use water charges and rates from industrial and mining companies, exclusi e of residential customers; (d) which mines in the Pilbara have aquifer reinjection schemes in operation; and (e) for each ine with an aquifer reinjection scheme in operation, can the Minister please outline how each of these schemes work, as split out by operation, describing: (i) the nature of each scheme itself (i.e. the model used); (ii) the name of the aquifer being recharged by each scheme; and (iii) the name of the formation within each aquifer that is being recharged? Answer (a) (i) Yes [See tabled paper no.] (ii) Mines that have licensed aquifer reinjection schemes, with current
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Cloudbreak
    Welcome to Cloudbreak This booklet provides you with the information needed to help make your stay at Cloudbreak more pleasant. Please take the time to read through the information before arriving on site. FEBRUARY 2009 Table of Contents Welcome Message ........................................................................................... 1 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 1 PART ONE: Before you depart ......................................................................... 2 The Pilbara ....................................................................................................... 3 Fortescue Metals Group Limited ...................................................................... 3 Cloudbreak....................................................................................................... 3 Packed and ready to go .................................................................................... 4 At the departure lounge ............................................................................... 4 Parking at Perth Airport ............................................................................... 5 Staying in touch ............................................................................................... 5 On Arrival ......................................................................................................... 5 At the Airstrip ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 20130627 D107351
    Ref: O10_0347 Submission to the Economic Regulation Authority – Floor and ceiling costs proposed by The Pilbara Infrastructure (TPI) 11 June 2013 FLOOR AND CEILING COSTS PROPOSED BY THE PILBARA INFRASTRUCTURE (TPI) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 2 2. CONTEXT AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................................... 2 1. Context .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Purpose........................................................................................................................................... 3 3. REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE ........................................................................................................... 4 4. COMMENTS ON COSTS PROPOSED BY TPI ....................................................................................... 5 1. TPI failure to provide costs for proposed access ................................................................... 5 2. TPI failure to provide Costing Model or supporting information ......................................... 5 3. Factors to be considered in an assessment of costs ............................................................. 6 5. BROCKMAN’S ASSESSMENT OF COSTS FOR THE ROUTE .................................................................. 7 6. COMPARISON
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together. Delivering Results. ABN 57 002 594 872 I 2015 Annual Report the YEAR at a GLANCE
    Working together. Delivering results. ABN 57 002 594 872 I 2015 Annual Report THE YEAR AT A GLANCE SAFETY Operating cost Total Recordable 5.1 Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) 21% 165.4 Revenue million tonnes shipped for FY15 US$8.6 13% billion Aboriginal employment achieved Fifth berth at Herb Elliott Port Commissioned March 2015 Fortescue River A$ Gas Pipeline 1.8 billion construction completed Contracts to Aboriginal companies and JVs 17.3 2.4 billion tonnes Ore Reserves Mineral Resources ABOUT FORTESCUE Overview 3 Fortescue Metals Group is a global leader in the iron ore industry, recognised for its culture, innovation and industry-leading development of world class infrastructure and mining assets in the Pilbara, Western Australia. Since it was founded in 2003, Fortescue has discovered and developed significant iron ore deposits and constructed some Operating and Financial Review 19 of the largest mines in the world. The Chichester Hub, which includes the Cloudbreak and Christmas Creek mines, is located in the Chichester Ranges, and produces more than 90 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of iron ore and an additional six mtpa from Fortescue’s joint venture with BC Iron. The Solomon Hub is located in the Hamersley Ranges, and includes Reserves and Resources 33 the Firetail and Kings Valley mines which produce in excess of 70 mtpa. Fortescue has constructed world class facilities at its five berth Herb Elliott Port in Port Hedland, and operates the fastest, heavy haul railway in the world with up to 42 tonne axle load capacity over 620km of track, including 12 bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan
    Report Integrated Rail Network Closure Plan Long Term Mine Planning 7 June 2018 R-PL-EN-0041 Rev 0 CLOSURE GUIDELINE CHECKLIST Report This closure plan addresses the progressive rehabilitation and closure of rail infrastructure projects associated with the Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004. In the absence of regulatory guidelines for inland infrastructure projects, this closure plan follows the report structure described within the Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans May 2015 published by the Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum (now the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety) and Environmental Protection Authority. The closure of mining operations, including quarries, is not within the scope of this closure plan. Closure Plan (CP) checklist Y/N Page Comments 1 Has the Checklist been endorsed by a senior Y 2 Report has been endorsed using representative within the tenement holder/operating standard Fortescue processes. company? Public Availability 2 Are you aware that from 2015 all CPs will be made N/A This report is not subject to mine closure publicly available? conditions under the Mining Act. 3 Is there any information in the CP that should not be N publicly available? 4 If “Yes” to Q3, has confidential information been N/A submitted in a separate document/section? Cover Page, Table of Contents 5 Does the CP cover page include: Y 1 This report is provided for information • Project Title only. • Company Name • Contact Details (including telephone numbers and email addresses) • Document ID and version number • Date of submission (needs to match the date of this checklist) Scope and Purpose 6 State why the CP is submitted Y 11 This plan has been provided to support the Eliwana Rail Project Public Environmental Review.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 August 2018 the Companies Officer Australian Securities
    17 August 2018 The Companies Officer Australian Securities Exchange Ltd Level 40, Central Park 152-158 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Dear Madam or Sir Fortescue Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources Update: Operating Properties Fortescue Metals Group (ASX:FMG, Fortescue) presents the Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources statement for its Hematite and Magnetite properties at 30 June 2018. Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources are reported in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, December 2012 (the JORC Code) as required by the Australian Securities Exchange. The annual summary will be included in Fortescue’s 2018 Annual Report and should be read in conjunction with the enclosed supporting technical information (Attachment 1 – Hematite Ore Reserve and Mineral Resources Report and Attachment 2 – Magnetite Ore Reserve and Mineral Resources Report). Hematite Ore Reserve and Mineral Resource – Operating Properties Reporting 30 June 2018 30 June 2017 Basis Million tonnes Fe% Million tonnes Fe% Ore Reserves (Dry Product) 2,250 57.4 2,191 57.2 Mineral Resources (Dry In-Situ) 6,122 56.4 5,279 56.0 Operating properties include the Chichester and Solomon Hubs as well as the Eliwana deposit (part of the Western Hub) following its transfer from development properties. The maiden reserve for Eliwana is at a 60.1 per cent iron grade. Ore deposit types include Bedded Iron (BID), Channel Iron (CID) and Detrital Iron (DID) mineralisation. The Iron Bridge Magnetite project is unchanged from the 2017 release, with the feasibility study continuing with a focus on optimising the commercialisation of mining, processing and infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecohydrological Conceptualisation of the Fortescue Marsh Region
    REPORT Ecohydrological Conceptualisation of the Fortescue Marsh Region Prepared for BHP Billiton Iron Ore September 2015 This report has been prepared solely for the purposes of informing environmental impact assessment pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) and Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) and is not intended for use for any other purpose. No representation or warranty is given that project development associated with any or all of the disturbance indicated in this report will actually proceed. As project development is dependent upon future events , the outcome of which is uncertain and cannot be assured, actual development may vary materially from this report. Ecohydrological Conceptualisation of the Fortescue Marsh Region This document has been prepared for the benefit of BHP Billiton Iron Ore. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement. QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD Tracy Schwinkowski Milo Simonic PREPARED BY Milo Simonic ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… CHECKED BY Johan van Rensburg ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… REVIEWED BY Gary Clark ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Milo Simonic ………………………………............... 02/09/2015… PERTH 41 Bishop Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Projects
    Civil Projects DOWNER’S MINING CIVIL PROJECTS DIVISION PROVIDES A TOTAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICE FOR THE ENGINEERING DESIGN, PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF MINE-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS THROUGHOUT WESTERN AUSTRALIA. PROJECT CAPABILITIES ■ mine workshop facilities; ■ diesel fuel bulk storage facilities; ■ lubrication storage including workshop reticulation; ■ administration facilities including underground service reticulation; ■ explosives storage facilities, bulk ammonium nitrate and emulsion; ■ heavy vehicle wash-facilities and associated oily-water processing ponds; ■ mine access roads and haul roads; ■ airstrips; ■ tailing storage facilities; and ■ mine development bulk earthworks. Managed by personnel with a wealth of experience in both the mining and civil construction industries, Downer is able to offer turnkey solutions for both greenfield and brownfield projects, and efficiently manage subcontractors for specialist work using its own proven Roy Hill Iron Ore Mine systems and controls. The role undertaken by us on a typical project includes: Annual targets for increased participation ■ management of engineering FORTESCUE METALS design and documentation for civil, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander GROUP, CLOUDBREAK MINE structural, mechanical, electrical and people are set across the business. hydraulic works; Cloudbreak Wash-pad ($4M) ■ procurement of materials and ROY HILL IRON ORE, ■ dual heavy vehicle wash-pad facility; equipment using the extensive ROY HILL MINE ■ associated sediment and treatment resources
    [Show full text]
  • IR-T15 Amendment Report Template V2.0 (July 2020) I
    Amendment Report Application for Licence Amendment Part V Division 3 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 Licence Number L8199/2007/2 Licence Holder Chichester Metals Group Ltd ACN 109 264 262 File Number DER2013/001073-2 Premises Cloudbreak Iron Ore Mine Mining Tenements M45/1126, M46/401, M46/404, M46/405, M46/356, M46/402, M46/410, M46/411, M46/357, M46/409, M46/453, M45/1128, M46/449, M46/452, M46/451, M46/454, M46/450, M45/1084, M45/1140, M45/1139, M45/1102, M45/1105, M45/1124, M45/1103, M45/1106, M45/1125, M45/1104, M45/1107, L46/48, L46/49, M45/1082, M45/1083, M45/1127, M45/1138, M45/1263, M46/403, M46/406, M46/407, M46/408, M46/409, M46/412, M46/413, M46/414, L46/52, L46/99, L46/46, L46/96, L46/64, L45/152, L46/47, L46/48, L46/51, L46/57, L46/62, L46/130 and Exploration Leases E45/2498, E46/590, E46/612, E45/2499, E45/2652, E45/2497 MULGA DOWNS WA 6751 Date of Report 1 April 2021 Decision Revised licence granted ALANA KIDD MANAGER, RESOURCE INDUSTRIES an officer delegated under section 20 of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) Licence: L8199/2007/2 IR-T15 Amendment Report Template v2.0 (July 2020) i Table of Contents Decision summary .............................................................................................. 1 Scope of assessment ......................................................................................... 1 2.1 Regulatory framework ......................................................................................... 1 2.2 Application summary ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy Cloudbreak Groundwater Operating Strategy Water
    Strategy Cloudbreak Groundwater Operating Strategy Water Management 30/06/13 CB-PH-HY-0009 Cloudbreak Groundwater Operating Strategy Page 3 of 81 CB-PH-HY-0009 Rev 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Approvals ........................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Document Scope ............................................................................................... 8 2. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................... 12 3. CLOUDBREAK OPERATING PLAN ............................................................................ 14 3.1 Project Development ....................................................................................... 14 3.2 Dewatering System.......................................................................................... 14 3.3 Conveyance system ........................................................................................ 15 3.3.1 Transfer ponds and settlement ponds .................................................. 15 3.3.2 Bulk flow and conveyance pipelines ..................................................... 15 3.4 Water Supply System ...................................................................................... 15 3.4.1 Ore processing
    [Show full text]
  • Licence Environmental Protection Act 1986, Part V Licensee
    Licence Environmental Protection Act 1986, Part V Licensee: Chichester Metals Pty Ltd Licence: L8454/2010/2 Registered office: 87 Adelaide Terrace EAST PERTH WA 6004 ACN: 109 264 262 Premises address: Christmas Creek Mine Site Tenements E46/610, E46/612, M46/320, M46/321, M46/322, M46/323, M46/324, M46/325, M46/326, M46/327, M46/328, M46/329, M46/330, M46/331, M46/332, M46/333, M46/334, M46/335, M46/336, M46/337, M46/338, M46/339, M46/340, M46/341, M46/342, M46/343, M46/344, M46/345, M46/346, M46/347, M46/348, M46/349, M46/350, M46/351, M46/352, M46/353, M46/354, M46/355, M46/403, M46/406, M46/412, M46/413, M46/414, M46/415, M46/416, M46/417, M46/418, M46/419, M46/420, M46/421, M46/422, M46/423, M46/424, G46/7, L46/49, L46/56, L46/58, L46/86, L46/87, L46/106, L46/111 E46/566 and L46/66 MULGA DOWNS WA 6751 As depicted in Schedule 1 Issue date: Thursday, 20 August 2015 Commencement date: Monday, 24 August 2015 Expiry date: Saturday, 23 August 2036 Prescribed premises category Schedule 1 of the Environmental Protection Regulations 1987 Category Approved premises Category Category description production or production or design number design capacity capacity 5 Processing or beneficiation of metallic 50,000 tonnes or 77,000,000 tonnes or non-metallic ore more per year per Annual Period 6 Mine dewatering 50,000 tonnes or 43,000,000 tonnes more per year per Annual Period (injected) 52 Electric power generation 10 MW or more in 56 MW aggregate (using a fuel other than natural gas) 54 Sewage facility 100 cubic metres 1,040 cubic metres or more per day per day 57 Used tyre storage 100 tyres or more 2,000 tyres Environmental Protection Act 1986 Page 1 of 34 Licence: L8454/2010/2 Amendment date: 14 July 2017 File Number: 2010/003105 IRLB_TI0672 v2.9 64 Class II putrescible landfill 20 tonnes or more 10,000 tonnes per per year Annual period 73 Bulk storage of chemicals 1,000 cubic metres 15,183.1 cubic in aggregate metres in aggregate Conditions This Licence is subject to the conditions set out in the attached pages.
    [Show full text]