Wonmunna SRE Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wonmunna SRE Final Report Level 2 short-range endemic invertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd October 2014 Final report Level 2 short-range endemic invertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd Level 2 short-range endemic invertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd Final report Authors: Volker Framenau Reviewers: Karen Crews Date: 20 October 2014 Submitted to: Gay Bradley and Ray Gerrard (Piacentini & Son) Chain of authorship and review Name Task Version Date Volker W. Framenau Final submitted to client 2.3 (version 2012) 25 January 2012 K. Crews Editorial review 3.0 (update 2014) 30 July 2014 Volker W. Framenau Draft for client comments 3.1 30 July 2014 Volker W. Framenau Final submitted to client 3.2 20 October 2014 ©Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2014 The use of this report is solely for the Client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this report may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or the Client. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Rd BALCATTA WA 6021 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 1049-WON-AR-SRE Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd i Level 2 short-range endemic invertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... VI 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope of work and survey objectives ...................................................................................... 4 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT .................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Commonwealth ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 State ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................................ 6 3.1 Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia (IBRA) .................................................... 6 3.2 Land systems ........................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Climate and weather ............................................................................................................. 11 3.4 Land use ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.5 Biological context .................................................................................................................. 12 3.5.1 Short-range endemic invertebrates .............................................................................. 12 3.5.2 Threatening processes .................................................................................................. 14 4 METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Desktop review and database searches ................................................................................ 15 4.2 Habitat assessment and site selection .................................................................................. 15 4.3 Survey methods .................................................................................................................... 15 4.3.1 Wet pitfall traps ............................................................................................................ 20 4.3.2 Foraging......................................................................................................................... 20 4.3.3 Litter/soil sieving ........................................................................................................... 20 4.4 taxonomy and nomenclature................................................................................................ 20 4.4.1 Morphological species identification ............................................................................ 20 4.4.2 Molecular species identification ................................................................................... 21 4.4.3 Nomenclature ............................................................................................................... 24 4.5 Statistical analyses ................................................................................................................ 25 4.6 Survey and laboratory personnel .......................................................................................... 26 5 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 26 5.1 Desktop study ....................................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Survey results ........................................................................................................................ 31 5.2.1 Molecular identification of Antichiropus millipedes ..................................................... 31 5.2.2 Survey summary ............................................................................................................ 32 5.3 Survey effectiveness ............................................................................................................. 38 5.4 Araneae – Mygalomorphae (Trapdoor Spiders) ................................................................... 41 5.4.1 Family Actinopodidae (Mouse Spiders) ........................................................................ 43 5.4.2 Family Nemesiidae (Wishbone Spiders) ....................................................................... 44 5.5 Pseudoscorpiones (False scorpions or Pseudoscorpions) .................................................... 45 5.5.1 Family Garypidae .......................................................................................................... 45 5.6 Scorpiones (Scorpions) .......................................................................................................... 47 5.7 Chilopoda (Centipedes) ......................................................................................................... 48 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd ii Level 2 short-range endemic invertebrate fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Ltd 5.7.1 Geophilomorpha ........................................................................................................... 48 5.7.2 Scolopendromorpha ..................................................................................................... 49 5.8 Diplopoda (Millipedes) .......................................................................................................... 51 5.8.1 Polydesmida .................................................................................................................. 52 5.9 Isopoda (Slaters) ................................................................................................................... 53 5.9.1 Family Armadillidae....................................................................................................... 55 5.9.2 Family Philosciidae ........................................................................................................ 55 5.10 Eupulmonata (land snails) ..................................................................................................... 56 5.10.1 Succineidae (amber snails) ............................................................................................ 58 5.11 Survey limitations ................................................................................................................. 59 6 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................... 61 6.1 Recommendations for management .................................................................................... 62 6.1.1 Species-specific recommendations ............................................................................... 62 6.1.2 Site-specific recommendations ..................................................................................... 64 7 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 65 APPENDIX 1 SITE DESCRIPTIONS ....................................................................................................... 72 APPENDIX 2 DESKTOP REVIEW: SHORT-RANGE ENDEMIC INVERTEBRATES ..................................... 99 APPENDIX 3 NUMBER OF SPECIMENS OF SRE TARGET TAXA COLLECTED DURING SURVEY .......... 110 Phoenix Environmental
Recommended publications
  • The Short-Range Endemic Invertebrate Fauna of the Ravensthorpe Range
    THE SHORT-RANGE ENDEMIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA OF THE RAVENSTHORPE RANGE MARK S. HARVEY MEI CHEN LENG Department of Terrestrial Zoology Western Australian Museum June 2008 2 Executive Summary An intensive survey of short-range endemic invertebrates in the Ravensthorpe Range at 79 sites revealed a small but significant fauna of myriapods and arachnids. Four species of short-range endemic invertebrates were found: • The millipede Antichiropus sp. R • The millipede Atelomastix sp. C • The millipede Atelomastix sp. P • The pseudoscorpion Amblyolpium sp. “WA1” Atelomastix sp. C is the only species found to be endemic to the Ravensthorpe Range and was found at 14 sites. Antichiropus sp. R, Atelomastix sp. P and Amblyolpium sp. “WA1” are also found at nearby locations. Sites of high importance include: site 40 with 7 species; sites 7 and 48 each with 5 species; and sites 18 and 44 each with 4 species. WA Museum - Ravensthorpe Range Survey 3 Introduction Australia contains a multitude of terrestrial invertebrate fauna species, with many yet to be discovered and described. Arthropods alone were recently estimated to consist of approximately more than 250,000 species (Yeates et al. 2004). The majority of these belong to the arthropod classes Insecta and Arachnida, and although many have relatively wide distributions across the landscape, some are highly restricted in range with special ecological requirements. These taxa, termed short-range endemics (Harvey 2002b), are taxa categorised as having poor dispersal abilities and/or requiring very specific habitats, usually with naturally small distributional ranges of less than 10,000 km2 and the following ecological and life-history traits: • poor powers of dispersal; • confinement to discontinuous habitats; • usually highly seasonal, only active during cooler, wetter periods; and • low levels of fecundity.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae) Indicates Multiple Glacial Refugia in Southeastern Australia
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 578:Phylogenetic 15–31 (2016) analysis of the Australian trans-Bass Strait millipede genus Pogonosternum... 15 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.578.8052 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Phylogenetic analysis of the Australian trans-Bass Strait millipede genus Pogonosternum (Carl, 1912) (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae) indicates multiple glacial refugia in southeastern Australia Peter Decker1 1 Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Am Museum 1, 02826 Görlitz, Germany Corresponding author: Peter Decker ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Mesibov | Received 5 February 2016 | Accepted 10 March 2016 | Published 7 April 2016 http://zoobank.org/B5513E69-0DED-4608-98BD-7ECD401B29E3 Citation: Decker P (2016) Phylogenetic analysis of the Australian trans-Bass Strait millipede genus Pogonosternum (Carl, 1912) (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae) indicates multiple glacial refugia in southeastern Australia. ZooKeys 578: 15–31. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.578.8052 Abstract This study documents the first detailed phylogenetic analysis of an Australian paradoxosomatid millipede genus. Two mitochondrial genes (partial COI and 16S) as well as partial nuclear 28S rDNA were ampli- fied and sequenced for 41 individuals of the southeastern Australian genus Pogonosternum Jeekel, 1965. The analysis indicates that five species groups ofPogonosternum occur across New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania: P. nigrovirgatum (Carl, 1912), P. adrianae Jeekel, 1982, P. laetificum Jeekel, 1982 and two undescribed species. P. coniferum (Jeekel, 1965) specimens cluster within P. nigrovirgatum. Most of these five species groups exhibit a pattern of high intraspecific genetic variability and highly local- ized haplotypes, suggesting that they were confined to multiple Pleistocene refugia on the southeastern Australian mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruny Island Tasmania 15–21 February 2016
    Bruny Island Tasmania 15–21 February 2016 Bush Blitz Species Discovery Program Bruny Island, Tasmania 15–21 February 2016 What is Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a multi-million dollar partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia to document plants and animals in selected properties across Australia. This innovative partnership harnesses the expertise of many of Australia’s top scientists from museums, herbaria, universities, and other institutions and organisations across the country. Abbreviations ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study AFD Australian Faunal Directory ALA Atlas of Living Australia ANIC Australian National Insect Collection CA Conservation Area DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (Tasmania) EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) MPA Marine Protected Area QM Queensland Museum RTBG Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens TMAG Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery TSP Act Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (Tasmania) UNSW University of New South Wales Page 2 of 40 Bruny Island, Tasmania 15–21 February 2016 UTas University of Tasmania Page 3 of 40 Bruny Island, Tasmania 15–21 February 2016 Summary A Bush Blitz expedition was conducted on Bruny Island, Tasmania, between 15 and 21 February 2016. The study area included protected areas on Bruny Island and parts of the surrounding marine environment. Bruny Island includes a wide diversity of micro-climates and habitat types. It is home to a number of species that are found only in Tasmania, including several threatened plant and animal species. In addition to its significant natural heritage, the island is the traditional land of the Nununi people and contains many sites of cultural significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography for Barrow Island Terrestrial Invertebrates
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 83 135–144 (2013) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.83.2013.135-144 SUPPLEMENT Annotated bibliography for Barrow Island terrestrial invertebrates Christopher K. Taylor Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – A bibliography is provided of publications treating terrestrial invertebrates on Barrow Island. A brief overview is also given of natural history and invertebrate collections on Barrow Island. KEYWORDS: Arthropoda, Insecta, Arachnida, Gastropoda, publication history INTRODUCTION During the late 1800s Barrow Island was utilised at various times by pastoralists, guano miners, pearl As part of this special issue on the terrestrial and turtle fishers, and slavers (Hook et al. 2004; invertebrate fauna of Barrow Island in Western ‘Supreme Court—Civil Side’, West Australian, 26 Australia, we take the opportunity to present May 1887; ‘The native question’, Daily News [Perth], a bibliography of previous publications on the 16 February 1905). If any of these individuals subject. A more general bibliography of Barrow were interested in collecting invertebrates, their Island’s natural history was previously collated by endeavours in that field have not been recorded for Smith et al. (2006). The current bibliography differs posterity. from that in gathering not only publications for which Barrow Island was the primary focus, but J.T. Tunney of the Western Australian Museum also those in which Barrow Island specimens were spent six weeks on Barrow Island in 1901 (‘News considered as part of a broader study. and notes’, West Australian, 22 March 1901).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Marri Millipede' Antichiropus Variabilis
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 26 087–093 (2010) Optimised captive husbandry conditions for the Western Australian ‘Marri Millipede’ Antichiropus variabilis (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Paradoxosomatidae), with notes on natural history and tissue preservation techniques Janine M. Wojcieszek1, Mark S. Harvey2,1 and Michael G. Rix2 1Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology M092, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected] 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool D.C., Perth, Western Australia 6986, Australia. ABSTRACT – The millipede genus Antichiropus Attems, 1911, is extremely diverse and the majority of species are endemic to south-western Western Australia. Very little is known about the general biology of species of Antichiropus; however, these millipedes are becoming useful models for studies of speciation and sexual selection, and remain central to SRE-based conservation planning for government and industry in the expanding resources sector of Western Australia. This paper details optimised captive husbandry conditions and observations made regarding the natural history of one species – Antichiropus variabilis – following three years of fi eld collecting and laboratory-based behavioural and molecular research. INTRODUCTION found in Marri (Corymbia calophylla) and Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forests along much of the The genus Antichiropus is an extremely diverse Darling Escarpment east of Perth (Harvey 2002) (Figure group of largely short-range endemic (SRE) millipedes 2). Recent research investigating sexual selection (Harvey 2002), occurring in south-western Western in A. variabilis required the development of captive Australia and western South Australia (Harvey and husbandry procedures for laboratory experiments, and Mesibov 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Pattern, Duration and Multiple Mating in Chondromorpha Severini Silvestri (Diplopoda: Polydesmida)
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.23.263863; this version posted August 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Mating pattern, duration and multiple mating in Chondromorpha severini Silvestri (Diplopoda: Polydesmida). S. Bhakat Rampurhat College, Rampurhat- 731224, Dist. Birbhum, W. B. India E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-4926-2496 Abstract Mating behaviour of Chondromorpha severini, a polydesmid millipede was studied in the field and in the laboratory condition. Copulating pair follows the general rule of love play before actual act of coitus. Mating duration varied from one to 25 minute with an average of eight minute. Mating frequency was maximum in early and late hours of day. In the multiple mate preference experiment, 10 pairs of male and female were used to calculate preference index (Pi) of individual sex. Preference index varies from 0.65 to 0.91. The implication of multiple mating has been discussed in detail. The study confirmed that i) the species belongs to polygynandrous mating system where males are the pursuers and females are the accomplishers ii) short and long duration mating is related to mate acquisition and mate guarding respectively Keywords: Love play, preference index, polygynandrous, short and long duration mating, triplet formation bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.23.263863; this version posted August 24, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity of Populations of a Southern African Millipede, Bicoxidens Flavicollis (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae)
    Genetic diversity of populations of a Southern African millipede, Bicoxidens flavicollis (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae) by Yevette Gounden 212502571 Submitted in fulfillment of the academic requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Genetics) School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Westville campus November 2018 As the candidate’s supervisor I have/have not approved this thesis/dissertation for submission. Signed: _____________ Name: _____________ Date: _____________ ABSTRACT The African millipede genus Bicoxidens is endemic to Southern Africa, inhabiting a variety of regions ranging from woodlands to forests. Nine species are known within the genus but Bicoxidens flavicollis is the most dominant and wide spread species found across Zimbabwe. Bicoxidens flavicollis individuals have been found to express phenotypic variation in several morphological traits. The most commonly observed body colours are brown and black. In the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe body colour ranges from orange- yellow to black, individuals from North East of Harare have a green-black appearance and a range in size (75–110 mm). There is disparity in body size which has been noted with individuals ranging from medium to large and displaying variation in the number of body rings. Although much morphological variation has been observed within this species, characterization based on gonopod morphology alone cannot distinguish or define variation between phenotypically distinct individuals. Morphological classification has been found to be too inclusive and hiding significant genetic variation. Taxa must be re-assessed with the implementation of DNA molecular methods to identify the variation between individuals. This study aimed to detect genetic divergence of B. flavicollis due to isolation by distance of populations across Zimbabwe.
    [Show full text]
  • Raven, RJ 1984. a Revision of the Aname Maculata Species Group
    Raven,R. J. 1984.A revision of the Anamemaculata species group(Araneae, Dipluridae) with notes on biogeography.J. ArachnoL,12:177-193. A REVISION OF THE ANAME MA CULA TA SPECIES GROUP (DIPLURIDAE, ARANEAE) WITH NOTES ON BIOGEOGRAPHY Robert1 J. Raven Queensland Museum Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Queensland ABSTRACT Thespecies of the Anamem¢culata (Hogg) species-group (previously Chenistonia) are revised. The type species, Chenistonlamaculara Hogg, and C trevallynia Hickmanare diagnosed.Five new species: A. caeruleomontana,A. earrhwatchorum,A. hiekmani,A. montanaand A. tropica, are described. Asmost of these species possess a serrula, absent in manyother species of Aname,the groupis of phylo~eneticsignificance. Becausethe groupoccurs in discontinuousmontane talnforests fromnorthern Queensland to Tasmania,it is also of biogeographicinterest. INTRODUCTION The Anamemaculata species group includes someof those species previously included in Chenistonia which Raven (1981) considered monophyletic. Although the species have revised lack a synapomorphythey remain a coherent taxonomicunit. Males of all species have a moderately short embolus on the palp and the first metatarsus is not usually as incrassate as that of the A. pallida species group. Twopreviously described species, Anamemaculata (Hogg) and Anametrevallynia (Hickman), are included in the group present. The male of "Chenistonia tepperi’ Hogg[presumably that described by Rainbow and PuUeine(1918) as Chenistonia major Hoggand placed by Main (1972) in Stanwellia] is being revised by Mainas part of the very complex’Chenistonia tepperi’ species group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All drawings were made with a camera-lucida. Spermathecae were drawn after being cleared in lactic acid. All measurementsare in millimetres except eye measurements which are in ocular micrometerunits.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinal-Level Phylogenomics of the Arthropod Class
    Ordinal-Level Phylogenomics of the Arthropod Class Diplopoda (Millipedes) Based on an Analysis of 221 Nuclear Protein-Coding Loci Generated Using Next- Generation Sequence Analyses Michael S. Brewer1,2*, Jason E. Bond3 1 Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America, 3 Department of Biological Sciences and Auburn University Museum of Natural History, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America Abstract Background: The ancient and diverse, yet understudied arthropod class Diplopoda, the millipedes, has a muddled taxonomic history. Despite having a cosmopolitan distribution and a number of unique and interesting characteristics, the group has received relatively little attention; interest in millipede systematics is low compared to taxa of comparable diversity. The existing classification of the group comprises 16 orders. Past attempts to reconstruct millipede phylogenies have suffered from a paucity of characters and included too few taxa to confidently resolve relationships and make formal nomenclatural changes. Herein, we reconstruct an ordinal-level phylogeny for the class Diplopoda using the largest character set ever assembled for the group. Methods: Transcriptomic sequences were obtained from exemplar taxa representing much of the diversity of millipede orders using second-generation (i.e., next-generation or high-throughput) sequencing. These data were subject to rigorous orthology selection and phylogenetic dataset optimization and then used to reconstruct phylogenies employing Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood optimality criteria. Ancestral reconstructions of sperm transfer appendage development (gonopods), presence of lateral defense secretion pores (ozopores), and presence of spinnerets were considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Zt03383p038.Pdf
    Zootaxa 3383: 15–38 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular and morphological characterisation of new species in the trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Nemesiidae) from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Australia FRANCES S. B. HARVEY1, VOLKER W. FRAMENAU2,3,6, JANINE M. WOJCIESZEK3,7, MICHAEL G. RIX2 & MARK S. HARVEY2,3,4,5 1Shenton College, 227 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, Western Australia 6008, Australia 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia 3School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 4 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 49th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA; and California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94103-3009, USA 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 6Current address: Phoenix Environmental Sciences, 1/511 Wanneroo Road, Balcatta, Western Australia 6021, Australia 7Current address: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia Abstract A study of selected species in the nemesiid spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Aus- tralia was undertaken using molecular and morphological techniques. Bayesian and parsimony analyses of mitochondrial sequence data from the Cytochrome c Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene found evidence for four species, confirming our initial morphological examination of adult male specimens. These four species are here described as A. mellosa n.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Carnarvon Station Reserve QLD 2014, a Bush Blitz Survey Report
    Carnarvon Station Reserve Queensland 7 – 17 October 2014 Bush Blitz species discovery program Carnarvon Station Reserve, Queensland 7–17 October 2014 What is Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a multi-million dollar partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia to document plants and animals in selected properties across Australia. This innovative partnership harnesses the expertise of many of Australia’s top scientists from museums, herbaria, universities, and other institutions and organisations across the country. Abbreviations ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study ALA Atlas of Living Australia ANH Australian National Herbarium ANIC Australian National Insect Collection CANBR Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research (Australian National Herbarium) EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) QM Queensland Museum Page 2 of 44 Carnarvon Station Reserve, Queensland 7–17 October 2014 Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted at Carnarvon Station Reserve in Central Queensland between 7 and 17 October 2014. The reserve sits within the Brigalow Belt bioregion, which is one of the most extensive, fertile and well- watered areas in Northern Australia. The vast majority of this bioregion has been cleared of vegetation for agriculture. This former cattle station has been a Bush Heritage property since 2001 and encompasses a valley flanked by mountains. Past grazing has impacted the vegetation of the valleys and plains but not the rugged hills. The reserve protects a wide range of habitats and at least 10 threatened species. The lowland woodlands and bluegrass downs that cover much of the valley floor are important additions to the rugged ranges protected in neighbouring Carnarvon National Park.
    [Show full text]