Not Just a Numbers Game: Increasing Women's Participation in UN
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women with a Blue Helmet
Women with a Blue Helmet The Integration of Women and Gender Issues in UN Peacekeeping Missions Francesco Bertolazzi UN-INSTRAW Working Paper Series The United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (UN-INSTRAW) promotes applied research on gender, facilitates information sharing, and supports capacity building through networking mechanisms and multi- stakeholder partnerships with UN agencies, governments, academia and civil society. The Gender, Peace and Security Programme promotes inclusive peace and human security for men, women, boys and girls through research, knowledge management and capacity building. The Gender, Peace and Security Working Paper Series publishes the results of research conducted by the programme. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or UN-INSTRAW. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or UN-INSTRAW concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Women with a Blue Helmet: The Integration of Women and Gender Issues in UN Peacekeeping Missions Author: Francesco Bertolazzi Supervisor: Nicola Popovic Editor and Reviewer: Hilary Anderson and Corey Barr United Nations International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (UN-INSTRAW) César Nicolás Penson 102-A Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic Phone: 1-809-685-2111 Fax: 1-809-685-2117 Email: [email protected] Webpage: http://www.un-instraw.org Copyright 2010 All rights reserved 1 Acknowledgements UN-INSTRAW and the author would like to thank the UN peacekeeping missions which participated in this survey, specifically MINURSO, MINUSTAH, MONUC, ONUCI, UNAMID, UNFICYP, UNMIK, UNMIL, UNMIS, UNMIT, UNOMIG, UNPOL and their relative Gender Advisors, Gender Focal Points and staff. -
The Consequences of Russo-Georgian War
Mise au Point A Russian convoy outside the village of Dzhaba in South Ossetia Photo : Dmitry Kostyukov/AFP- Getty Images Much Ado about Nothing? The Consequences of Russo-Georgian War Par Elena Mizrokhi, Auxiliaire de recherche pour la Chaire de recherche du Canada sur les conflits identitaires et le terrorisme et pour le Programme Paix et sécurité internationales The confrontation between Russia and six-point plan, proved to be a failure when Russia Georgia that took place from the 7th to the 13th of announced that its troops in the two enclaves August 2008 was Moscow‟s first act of military would "be considered foreign troops stationed in aggression against a neighbouring state since the independent states under bilateral agreements" invasion of Afghanistan in 1978 (Cornell et al., one month after the cease fire. It remains unclear, 2008). The 5 day conflict was rich in rhetoric as who if anyone, benefited from the August well as action. Its consequences, however, were confrontation. In a way, Russia succeeded in significant mostly on a regional level and did not hampering any possible resolution of the two result in an upheaval of the new multipolar world conflicts that would inevitably limit its role in the as some experts argued they would. Russia‟s region. However, Moscow‟s more likely recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia on the objective to use the two republics as pawns to 26th of August 2008 has changed the political punish Georgia for its pro-Western policy landscape of the South Caucasus. Despite the ambitions, has not received even a minimal show reinforced economic and political links with of support among Russia‟s allies let alone the Russia the two republics today find themselves other members of the world stage. -
Russia-Georgia Conflict in August 2008
= :88.&8*47,.&=43+1.(9=.3=:,:89=,**2a= 439*=9=&3)=251.(&9.438=+47=_ _=39*7*898= .2=.(-41= 5*(.&1.89=.3= :88.&3=&3)=:7&8.&3=++&.78= &7(-=-`=,**3= 43,7*88.43&1= *8*&7(-=*7;.(*= 18/1**= <<<_(78_,4;= -.0+2= =*5479=+47=43,7*88 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress :88.&8*47,.&= 43+1.(9=.3=:,:89=,**2a=439*=9=&3)= 251.(&9.438=+47=__= 39*7*898= = :22&7>= In the early 1990s, Georgia and its breakaway South Ossetia region had agreed to a Russian- mediated ceasefire that provided for Russian “peacekeepers” to be stationed in the region. Moscow extended citizenship and passports to most ethnic Ossetians. Simmering long-time tensions escalated on the evening of August 7, 2008, when South Ossetia and Georgia accused each other of launching intense artillery barrages against each other. Georgia claims that South Ossetian forces did not respond to a ceasefire appeal but intensified their shelling, “forcing” Georgia to send in troops. On August 8, Russia launched air attacks throughout Georgia and Russian troops engaged Georgian forces in South Ossetia. By the morning of August 10, Russian troops had occupied the bulk of South Ossetia, reached its border with the rest of Georgia, and were shelling areas across the border. Russian troops occupied several Georgian cities. Russian warships landed troops in Georgia’s breakaway Abkhazia region and took up positions off Georgia’s Black Sea coast. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, serving as the president of the European Union (EU), was instrumental in getting Georgia and Russia to agree to a peace plan on August 15-16. -
Security Council Distr.: General 15 December 2005
United Nations S/2005/791 Security Council Distr.: General 15 December 2005 Original: English Letter dated 14 December 2005 from the Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to forward the assessment of the work of the Security Council by the presidency of the Philippines in September 2005 (see annex). It would be highly appreciated if the present letter and its annex could be circulated as a document of the Council. (Signed) Lauro L. Baja, Jr. Permanent Representative 05-66519 (E) 070206 *0566519* S/2005/791 Annex to the letter dated 14 December 2005 from the Permanent Representative of the Philippines to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council Assessment of the work of the Security Council during the presidency of the Philippines (September 2005) Introduction The Republic of the Philippines, with its Permanent Representative, H.E. Mr. Lauro L. Baja, Jr., at the helm, served as President of the Security Council in September 2005. The Security Council held 16 formal meetings and 12 consultations of the whole, adopted 9 resolutions, 2 decisions and 3 presidential statements, and issued 6 press statements during the month under review. The highlight of the month was the historic gathering of the Security Council at the level of Heads of State and Government on 14 September 2005. At the summit the Council adopted a resolution on terrorism and another resolution on conflict prevention, particularly in Africa. During the month, the Council also held a thematic debate on “The role of civil society in conflict prevention and the pacific settlement of disputes,” where representatives of the civil society participated in the discussion. -
Annex E.4.17 Public
ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.17 13-10-2015 1/27 EK PT Annex E.4.17 Public ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.17 13-10-2015 2/27 EK PT ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.17 13-10-2015 3/27 EK PT The Norwegian Helsinki Committee (NHC) has worked closely with many Georgian and international human rights groups in documenting and reporting about crimes committed during and after the 2008 war. Three Georgian human rights groups have contributed with research for this report, namely Article 42, Georgian Young Lawyers' Association (GYLA) and Georgia's Human Rights Center (HRC). However, responsibility for analyses and conclusions rests with the NHC. Data for this report was collected in November and December 2010 by the following researchers: Nino Doliashvili, Dato Gioshvili, Neli Kareli, Nino Qurasbediani, Qeri Saraji (all from Article 42); Nino Jomaridze (from GYLA); Shorena Latatia, Nika Legashvili, Giorgi Margiani, Saba Tsitsikashvili (all from HRC); Aage Borchgrevink and Simon Papuashvili (both from the NHC). The report was written by Aage Borchgrevink and Simon Papuashvili, and edited by Aage Borchgrevink and Gunnar M. Ekeleve-Slydal (from NHC). \ GEO-OTP-0005-0739 111111111111111 m11 m111111 ICC-01/15-4-AnxE.4.17 13-10-2015 4/27 EK PT Summary and conctuslons Almost three years have passed since the armed conflict between Georgia and Russia in August 2008. Evidence from a wide range of sources indicates that grave crimes occurred during the conflict, including war crimes and crimes againsl humanity. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has decided that these crimes fall under its mandate and is currently monitoring domestic investigations of crimes in Georgia and Russia1• If the Court finds that the parties arc unable or unwilling to effectively investigate, the Court may assume jurisdiction and open an investigation. -
The War in Georgia and the Western Response
This article was downloaded by: [National Chengchi University] On: 14 September 2012, At: 01:42 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Central Asian Survey Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccas20 The war in Georgia and the Western response Mike Bowker a a School of Political, Social and International Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK Version of record first published: 24 May 2011. To cite this article: Mike Bowker (2011): The war in Georgia and the Western response, Central Asian Survey, 30:2, 197-211 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2011.570121 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Central Asian Survey Vol. -
YEAR in REVIEW 2004 United Nations Peace Operations
YEAR IN REVIEW 2004 United Nations Peace Operations asdf United Nations TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Surge in peacekeeping 2004: Year of the surge in peacekeeping ...................................................................................... 1 II. Deploying new missions: elements of the surge ONUB: UN peacekeeping comes to Burundi ............................................................................... 3 UNOCI: Working to uphold the peace agreement in Côte d’Ivoire ...................................... 4 MINUSTAH: Overcoming growing pains ...................................................................................... 5 UNAMIS: Sudan - A new mission on the horizon ....................................................................... 7 III. Missions coming down to a close UNAMSIL: A success story in UN peacekeeping ......................................................................... 9 MINUGUA: Leaving Guatemala with mission accomplished ................................................... 9 UNMISET: Winding up six years of peacekeeping in Timor-Leste .......................................... 10 IV. Overcoming crises: missions with special challenges in 2004 MONUC: Facing mounting challenges .......................................................................................... 11 UNMEE: Marginal progress in the peace process ....................................................................... 12 UNMIK: Holding Kosovo to high standards ............................................................................... -
The Activities of a Personal Representative of the OSCE Chair
In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2001, Baden-Baden 2002, pp. 201-210. Heidi Tagliavini Conflict Prevention and Conflict Management in Georgia - The Activities of a Personal Representative of the OSCE Chair On 29 December 1999, the then Austrian Foreign Minister Wolfgang Schüssel appointed me Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson-in- Office for Missions in the Caucasus. It was my task to give support and ad- vice to the Chair on all issues involving the conflicts in Chechnya/the Rus- sian Federation as well as in South Ossetia/Georgia and Abkhazia/Georgia. My mandate included the following: - promoting the efforts of all parties involved and the international com- munity in finding a solution in conformity with OSCE principles; - developing strategies for comprehensive initiatives to promote respect- ing OSCE norms and principles in the region; 1 - advising and supporting the Chairperson-in-Office to advance these efforts being made in the region; - fostering close contacts with international organizations (the Council of Europe, the European Union, the United Nations etc.) in the name of the Chairperson-in-Office. The Caucasus was one of the priorities of the Austrian Chair, which led to the decision to appoint a Personal Representative for this region. My mandate ended on 31 December 2000. On the Instrument of the Personal Representative of the Chairman-in-Office The "Personal Representative" is one of the OSCE instruments available to the Chair during its year in office. It is designed to provide support to the Chair for a specific task. The appointment of Personal Representatives is a prerogative of the Chair. -
United Nations
A/59/2 United Nations Report of the Security Council 1 August 2003-31 July 2004 General Assembly Official Records Fifty-ninth Session Supplement No. 2 (A/59/2) General Assembly Official Records Fifty-ninth Session Supplement No. 2 (A/59/2) Report of the Security Council 1 August 2003-31 July 2004 United Nations • New York, 2004 A/59/2 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/...) are normally published in quarterly Supplements to the Official Records of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which information about it is given. The resolutions of the Security Council are published in yearly volumes of Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council. ISSN 0082-8238 [29 September 2004] Contents Chapter Page Introduction .................................................................... 1 Part I Activities relating to all questions considered by the Security Council under its responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security I. Resolutions adopted by the Security Council during the period from 1 August 2003 to 31 July 2004 ................................................................... 25 II. Statements made and/or issued by the President of the Security Council during the period from 1 August 2003 to 31 July 2004................................................ 30 III. Official communiqués issued by the Security Council during the period from 1 August 2003 to 31 July 2004 ................................................................. 33 IV. Monthly assessments by former Presidents of the work of the Security Council for the period from 1 August 2003 to 31 July 2004 ......................................... -
History in the Context of the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict*
BRILL Iran and the Caucasus 18 (2074) 289-374 History in the Context of the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict* George Hewitt School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Abstract The 2014 disturbances in the Ukraine occasioned renewed discussion of the 2008 Russo- Georgian War. As the situation continued to worsen in eastern Ukraine, US President Obama announced on a visit to Poland at the start of June that the US and NATO would strengthen ties even with the non-NATO-member-states of the Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. This last has aspirations of membership, even though it does not control the re publics of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which most of the world nevertheless regards as in tegral parts of Georgia. As long as the Georgian-Abkhazian dispute remains unresolved, there will be problems regarding inter-state relations with/for western Transcaucasia. And there can be no resolution of the Abkhazian issue without a proper understanding of Ab khazia’s history (both ancient and more recent); it was to try to ensure that the debate is not based on misconceptions, unsubstantiated assertions or even plain errors that this ar ticle was written, it is grounded on a consideration of a range of materials (from Agathias' Greek text through relevant discussions in Georgian, Russian and English). The toppling of Abkhazia’s democratically elected president (Aleksandr Ankvab) at the end of May 2014 makes the question of Abkhazia even more topical. Keywords Abkhazia, Georgia, Georgian-Abkhazian Dispute, Caucasian History Events during the spring of 2014 in the Ukraine (in particular Russia’s reacquisition of the Crimea) reawakened Western memories of the short Russo-Georgian war of August 2008. -
Refugees and the Regional Dynamics of Peacebuilding
Refugees and the Regional Dynamics of Peacebuilding APRIL 2011 Introduction By their very nature, refugee movements regionalize the effects of conflict as they spill over into neighboring territories. This is particularly true in the world's poorest and most unstable regions, where countries like Guinea, Tanzania, and Pakistan have opened their borders to hundreds of thousands of On May 3-4, 2010, the International refugees. Host countries may in some instances already be involved—either Peace Institute (IPI) and the Pierre directly or indirectly—in the conflict, but refugee flows can also generate 1 Elliott Trudeau Foundation of instability in neighboring countries and trigger cross-border interventions. Montreal co-hosted an event The mass arrival and prolonged presence of refugees in neighboring entitled “Refugees and the Regional countries can have a negative impact on peace: armed elements within the Dynamics of Peacebuilding.”* This refugee population can act as spoilers to a peace process; host countries can event brought together approxi - push for for early and unsustainable repatriation; refugees can be politicized mately forty policy experts and either before or during exile; and refugees can put a major strain on host- practitioners from the humanitarian country capacity. But the reverse is also true, in that there are cases where host countries have been inspired to play a positive role in finding solutions to a and peacebuilding communities for crisis in order to resolve the refugee situation. Likewise, refugees may a focused discussion on the regional contribute to peacebuilding in their country of origin, especially when they dynamics of refugee situations and benefit from training while in exile. -
O C H a in 2004
UNITED NATIONS OCHA IN 2004 OCHAin 2004 OCHAin 2004 OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS ACTIVITIES AND EXTRA-BUDGETARY FUNDING REQUIREMENTS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OF HUMANITARIAN OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION UNITED NATIONS IN MEMORIAM In memory of our fallen colleagues who gave their lives while working for the ideals to which OCHA is dedicated. Ms. Leen Assad Al-Qadi Mr. Ranilo Buenaventura Mr. Reza Hosseini Mr. Ihssan Taha Husain Ms. Martha Teas Mr. Basim Mahmood Utaiwi Mr. Sergio Vieira de Mello OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OCHA in 2004 ACTIVITIES AND EXTRA-BUDGETARY FUNDING REQUIREMENTS UNITED NATIONS Editorial Team Prepared by OCHA staff and consultants under the guidance of Ed Tsui, Director OCHA, New York. OCHA wishes to acknowledge the outstanding contribution of its committed staff at Headquarters and in the field in the preparation of the narrative, financial and graphic components of the document. Managing Editor: Abdul Basit Haqqani, Consultant. Consultant Editors: Nancy Lucas Cathy Sabety Layout, cover, graphics and tables: Phoenix-Trykkeriet as, Denmark Maps: John Marinos, ReliefWeb, OCHA. Photographs: OCHA wishes to thank ReliefWeb, IRIN, IFRC, Tom Haskill (WFP), Evan Schneoder, Charles Higgins, Debbi Morello and Eskinder Debebe (UNDPI), David Snyder (Catholic Relief Services), Jenny Chu (International Medical Corps) and Brent Stirton for the photographs included in the document. Cover Picture: by David Snyder/CRS For additional information, please contact: Magda Ninaber van Eyben Donor Relations, Geneva United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Telephone: (41) 22 917 1864 E-mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Foreword OCHA Organigramme OCHA Field Presence Natural Disaster Coordination Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................