Emergency Site Assessment: Northern Ethiopia Crisis 4 Data Collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Publication Date: 14 April 2021 KEY FINDINGS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emergency Site Assessment: Northern Ethiopia Crisis 4 Data Collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Publication Date: 14 April 2021 KEY FINDINGS Emergency Site Assessment: Northern Ethiopia Crisis 4 Data Collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Publication Date: 14 April 2021 KEY FINDINGS BACKGROUND: 1,064,176 IDPs* In early November 2020, the regional party of Tigray allegedly attacked the Northern Command of Ethiopia’s National Defense Force in Mekelle, Tigray region, prompting a military offensive from the federal government of Ethiopia. Following this, conflict broke out in the north of Ethiopia and 235,882 IDP this has displaced many from their homes. Households* OVERVIEW: From 2 — 23 March 2021, the Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) deployed its Emergency Site Assessment to capture internal displacement related to the Northern Ethiopia Crisis. This 178 sites multisectoral location assessment assesses the number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and covered* collects basic information on the multisectoral needs of IDPs at site level. In this fourth round, 1,064,176 IDPs (235,882 households)* were found to be displaced across Conflict was 178 sites in Tigray, Amhara and Afar regions. 1,000,052 IDPs (218,246 households)* were found in the primary Tigray region, 45,343 IDPs (8,325 households) in Afar region and 18,781 IDPs (9,311 households) reason for in Amhara region. It should be noted that access and insecurity were considerable challenges for displacement this round. DISPLACEMENT CASELOADS IN TIGRAY, AMHARA AND AFAR REGIONS Adi Daero Chila Laelay Adiabo ERITREA TIGRAY Selekleka Shire town Asgede Adi Hageray Egela Erob Seyemti Adyabo Gulo Mekeda Tahtay Koraro Tahtay Adiyabo Ahsea Rama Chila Aheferom Dalol Asgede Bizet Laelay Adiabo Adigrat town Tsimbla Adwa Saesie Zana Selekleka Hahayle Endabaguna town Tahtay Koraro Shire Axum town North Western Estern Kunneba Leend Kafta Humera Hawzen Asgede LocationSUDAN Of IDP Sites Centrl Endabaguna town Naeder Maikinetal Atsbi Berahile May Kadra Western Korarit Zana IDP Figure from ESA round 2 Tsimbla Kelete Awelallo Adet Keyhe tekli Geraleta Wukro town Inaccessible Areas Welkait Midre Genet TIGRAY Agulae Kola Temben Nuer O IDPs Tsegede (TG) Tselemti Dima Awra (TG) Abi Adi town Kilti one2 110 - 2,500 Afdera Tanqua Melashe Mekelle Dansha Abaala 2,501 - 15,000 Tsegede (TG) Telemt Saharti Enderta 15,001 - 63,490 Abergele (TG) Addi Arekay Telemt AFAR Tsegede (AM) North Gondr 63,491 - 129,525 Debark Beyeda South Estern 129,525 - 439,210 Debark Town Abergele (AM) Mirab Armacho Samre Hintalo Boundries Erebti Tach Armacho Janamora Wajirat Planned Areas to Assess Metema Dabat Selewa International Boundaries Dabat Town Bidu Sahila Emba Alaje Disputed Boundaries AMHARA Regional Boundaries Kinfaz Zequala Lay Armacho Tsagbeji Raya Azebo Zonal Boundaries Megale Wegera Centrl Gondr Wa Hr Sekota Endamehoni West Gondr Southern May Kadra Chilga 2 Chilga 1 Gonder town Sekota town West Belesa East Belesa Zata Ofla Teru Dehana Chercher Yalo Gonder Zuria Fnti one 4 West Dembiya Raya Alamata Midre GenetQuara TIGRAY Gaz Gibla Kori Takusa Ebenat AMHARA Dansha town Gulina Libokemekem Bugna South Gondr Lasta Le Tn North Wello Raya Kobo Awra (AF) Alfa Lay Gayint Gidan Jawi Ai Fogera Farta Meket MeteelMirab Armacho Euwa 0 30 60 120 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries Sources: ESRI, IOM, UNJLC Kilometers on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Map 1: Displacement related to the Northern Ethiopia Crisis across Tigray, Amhara and Afar regions. *This displacement total includes the 38,500 IDPs (7,800 households) identified across 7 sites in Southern zone and South- eastern zone that were covered during round 2 but were inaccessible during round 4 due to insecurity. Please refer to the annex for the full details. 1 Emergency Site Assessment: Northern Ethiopia Crisis 4 Data Collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Publication Date: 14 April 2021 METHODOLOGY Data collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Baseline Location Assessment (B2F): Data is collected The ESA is carried out on a monthly basis. In this third round, through interviews with key informants from woreda level 3 regions, 11 zones, 41 woredas, 95 kebeles and 171 sites Disaster Risk Management Offices (DRMO), community were covered. representatives, education and health offices. This baseline data includes the estimated number of internally displaced The number of participants in focus group discussions for persons by kebele, a list of kebeles hosting IDPs, reason for the Emergency Site Assessment are based on the size of the displacement and shelter types. This baseline data is used to displaced population at the site: guide the geotargeting of the Emergency Site Assessment. 4 IDPs for sites with 50-100 IDP households Emergency Site Assessment (ESA): This assessment captures 5 IDPs for sites with 101-150 IDP households detailed information through focus group discussions and 6 IDPs for sites with 151-200 IDP households direct observation. Data collected covers the number of IDPs, 7 IDPs for sites with 201 IDP households or more site details, availability of infrasturcture and services, shelter types, and access to food, water, healthcare, education and Depending on the size of the focus group discussion, more livelihoods. The ESA is conducted in any location in Tigray, IDP leaders, females, youths and elderly persons must and in the neighbouring zones of Amhara and Afar with be part of the discussion. However, the aim is to have reported displacements of 20 IDP households or more who 50% female participation in every focus group discussion were displaced due to the Northern Ethiopia Crisis, provided whenever it is possible. that access and security allow. ACCESSIBILITY AND COVERAGE IN TIGRAY, AMHARA AND AFAR REGIONS Ai Daero aela Aiabo ERITREA elelea ela rob North estern Ahea Tahta Aiabo aa aeie Chila Dalol Airat Aee hire ton Aa Tahta oraro Au Tahta oraro Eastern Koneba ata uera Aee Centra erahile nabauna ton aen Atbi Ma ara Korarit Western ana Aet Aee ibla SUDAN Kehe teli Wuro ibla Welait AY ana Aulae nabauna ton eee eleti Dia Ara Abi ai Aera AY Danha Meelle Telet eee Ai Areay Abaala iati one aharti North onar Aberele nerta eee Debar eyea Soth Eastern Aberele intalo SUDAN are rebti Tach Aracho anaora Metea Wairat Dabat iu ahila AA euala Weera ina abei a Aracho aa Aebo Wag amra Meale eota Teru Chila 2 Chila 1 Sothern Weera Wet elea ata la at elea Dehana aa Chercher Kori liar Yalo Centra onar aa Alaata Fanti one 4 West onar a ibla Taua benat uara ulina una ata aa obo iboeee ian een ae ana Ara A Dubti arta ocation DP ite Ala North eo Foera a aint Asi one Meet Anot ua Planne Area to Ae Asayita ai Soth onar abru Dera AM Wala Delanta nternational ounarie Chira DJIBOUTI Guba AAA Abael Mile AAA Mecha ahirar uria Daunt Worebabu Dipute ounarie Dangura Ma ara AY Wet ite Pawe eaa Afambo eional ounarie Debub Mecha Kutaber Aar Meela Tenta erani Ai one ENSAN ati onal ounarie aint etee West oam eae alu Madira eela Partiall Accee ana uarit Soth eo Telale Sedal Mire enet ai one eabo ull AcceeAyisha Kemashi DanhaGuangua romia eane Gablalu Dae SA Wenbera Ankasha East oam Accee ut o DP Bulen Siti Debati Wee Kelela Daleae Debecha enan neay Ae nacceible Michael Hadhagala aa ari one North Shea aelela AsosaMirab Aracho Kemashi Accee Durin oun 2 0 30 60 120 Disclaimer : This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries Sources: ESRI, IOM, UNJLC Kilometers on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Map 2: Levels of accessibility and areas where the Emergency Site Assessment was conducted across Tigray, Amhara and Afar regions. 2 Emergency Site Assessment: Northern Ethiopia Crisis 4 Data Collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Publication Date: 14 April 2021 Please note that all analysis from this page onwards refers to the IDPs and sites tracked solely by ESA round 4 covering 1,025,676 IDPs (228,082 households) tracked across 171 accessible sites. DEMOGRAPHICS *Kindly note that the sex breakdown only applies to IDPs tracked in round 4 and were displaced after the crisis start- 48.1% males 51.9% females ed in November 455,568 males 490,603 females 2020. MOBILITY Number of sites where IDPs have SHIRE 445,309 IDPs 25 been previously displaced ADWA 129,524 IDPs Number of sites where IDPs have ADIGRAT 146 been displaced for the first time 100,168 IDPs The above are the top 3 woredas hosting the largest number of newly arrived IDPs. DURABLE SOLUTIONS 120 Sites 48 Sites 2 Sites (70%) (28%) (1%) Return Locally Integrate Relocate A majority of IDPs in 112 sites in A majority of IDPs in 34 sites in A majority of IDPs in 1 site in Afar Tigray, 7 sites in Afar and 1 site in Amhara, 10 sites in Afar and 4 sites and 1 site in Amhara prefer to re- Amhara prefer to return. in Tigray prefer to locally integrate. locate. Factors preventing return Support needed to locally integrate 3 Emergency Site Assessment: Northern Ethiopia Crisis 4 Data Collection: 2 — 23 March 2021 Publication Date: 14 April 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES The table below depicts the fuctional status of key infrastructure and services by number of sites: Mostly Mostly Not Infrastructure Infrastructure Functioning Functioning Is Destroyed Never Existed Electricity 83 47 18 23 Tap water 58 64 32 17 Cell phone 110 49 5 7 coverage 127 33 7 4 Road to site Primary school 55 71 34 11 Health facility 67 65 32 7 Place of 114 38 16 3 worship Market 108 31 18 14 SHELTER Types of Shelters IDPs are Living in In 27 sites, 25-50% of IDP households are living outside or in an open space and in 7 sites, 51-75% of IDP households are living outside. Of these 7 sites, 3 sites are in Axum, 2 sites are in Adwa and 2 sites are in Shire, Tigray region.
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • 20210714 Access Snapshot- Tigray Region June 2021 V2
    ETHIOPIA Tigray: Humanitarian Access Snapshot (July 2021) As of 31 July 2021 The conflict in Tigray continues despite the unilateral ceasefire announced by the Ethiopian Federal Government on 28 June, which resulted in the withdrawal of the Ethiopian National Overview of reported incidents July Since Nov July Since Nov Defense Forces (ENDF) and Eritrea’s Defense Forces (ErDF) from Tigray. In July, Tigray forces (TF) engaged in a military offensive in boundary areas of Amhara and Afar ERITREA 13 153 2 14 regions, displacing thousands of people and impacting access into the area. #Incidents impacting Aid workers killed Federal authorities announced the mobilization of armed forces from other regions. The Amhara region the security of aid Tahtay North workers Special Forces (ASF), backed by ENDF, maintain control of Western zone, with reports of a military Adiyabo Setit Humera Western build-up on both sides of the Tekezi river. ErDF are reportedly positioned in border areas of Eritrea and in SUDAN Kafta Humera Indasilassie % of incidents by type some kebeles in North-Western and Eastern zones. Thousands of people have been displaced from town Central Eastern these areas into Shire city, North-Western zone. In line with the Access Monitoring and Western Korarit https://bit.ly/3vcab7e May Reporting Framework: Electricity, telecommunications, and banking services continue to be disconnected throughout Tigray, Gaba Wukro Welkait TIGRAY 2% while commercial cargo and flights into the region remain suspended. This is having a major impact on Tselemti Abi Adi town May Tsebri relief operations. Partners are having to scale down operations and reduce movements due to the lack Dansha town town Mekelle AFAR 4% of fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnobotany, Diverse Food Uses, Claimed Health Benefits And
    Shewayrga and Sopade Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2011, 7:19 http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/7/1/19 JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE RESEARCH Open Access Ethnobotany, diverse food uses, claimed health benefits and implications on conservation of barley landraces in North Eastern Ethiopia highlands Hailemichael Shewayrga1* and Peter A Sopade2,3 Abstract Background: Barley is the number one food crop in the highland parts of North Eastern Ethiopia produced by subsistence farmers grown as landraces. Information on the ethnobotany, food utilization and maintenance of barley landraces is valuable to design and plan germplasm conservation strategies as well as to improve food utilization of barley. Methods: A study, involving field visits and household interviews, was conducted in three administrative zones. Eleven districts from the three zones, five kebeles in each district and five households from each kebele were visited to gather information on the ethnobotany, the utilization of barley and how barley end-uses influence the maintenance of landrace diversity. Results: According to farmers, barley is the “king of crops” and it is put for diverse uses with more than 20 types of barley dishes and beverages reportedly prepared in the study area. The products are prepared from either boiled/roasted whole grain, raw- and roasted-milled grain, or cracked grain as main, side, ceremonial, and recuperating dishes. The various barley traditional foods have perceived qualities and health benefits by the farmers. Fifteen diverse barley landraces were reported by farmers, and the ethnobotany of the landraces reflects key quantitative and qualitative traits. Some landraces that are preferred for their culinary qualities are being marginalized due to moisture shortage and soil degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability and Its Prevalence and Cause in Northwestern Ethiopia
    Disability and its prevalence and cause in northwestern Ethiopia: evidence from Dabat district of Amhara National Regional State: A community based cross-sectional study Solomon Mekonnen Abebe ( [email protected] ) University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Ansha Nega Addis Ababa University Zemichel Gizaw University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Mulugeta Bayisa University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Solomon Fasika University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Molalign Belay University of Gondar College of Social Sciences and Humanities Abel Fekadu University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences Mikyas Abera University of Gondar College of Social Sciences and Humanities Research article Keywords: disability, PwDs, DHSS, household survey, northwestern Ethiopia Posted Date: August 4th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-18602/v3 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/16 Abstract Background Disability is not just a factor of an individual’s physical condition; it develops through human interactions and reects the social fabric of communities. Despite the fact that it directly affects 15% of Ethiopians, understanding and policy-relevant studies on disability and the conditions of persons with disabilities are lacking. The Dabat Demographic and Health Surveillance System part of the response to ll this gap. With signicant drawbacks in the Surveillance System, this study aimed at assessing the prevalence, types and major causes of disability in Dabat district. Method A community-based cross-sectional study design was employed and covered 17,000 households residing in 13 Kebeles of Dabat district.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Malaria Cases Associated with Environmental Risk Factors in Ethiopia Using Geographically Weighted Regression
    MODELING MALARIA CASES ASSOCIATED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS IN ETHIOPIA USING GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION Berhanu Berga Dadi i MODELING MALARIA CASES ASSOCIATED WITH ENVIRONMENTAL RISK FACTORS IN ETHIOPIA USING THE GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION MODEL, 2015-2016 Dissertation supervised by Dr.Jorge Mateu Mahiques,PhD Professor, Department of Mathematics University of Jaume I Castellon, Spain Ana Cristina Costa, PhD Professor, Nova Information Management School University of Nova Lisbon, Portugal Pablo Juan Verdoy, PhD Professor, Department of Mathematics University of Jaume I Castellon, Spain March 2020 ii DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I declare that the work described in this document is my own and not from someone else. All the assistance I have received from other people is duly acknowledged, and all the sources (published or not published) referenced. This work has not been previously evaluated or submitted to the University of Jaume I Castellon, Spain, or elsewhere. Castellon, 30th Feburaury 2020 Berhanu Berga Dadi iii Acknowledgments Before and above anything, I want to thank our Lord Jesus Christ, Son of GOD, for his blessing and protection to all of us to live. I want to thank also all consortium of Erasmus Mundus Master's program in Geospatial Technologies for their financial and material support during all period of my study. Grateful acknowledgment expressed to Supervisors: Prof.Dr.Jorge Mateu Mahiques, Universitat Jaume I(UJI), Prof.Dr.Ana Cristina Costa, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, and Prof.Dr.Pablo Juan Verdoy, Universitat Jaume I(UJI) for their immense support, outstanding guidance, encouragement and helpful comments throughout my thesis work. Finally, but not least, I would like to thank my lovely wife, Workababa Bekele, and beloved daughter Loise Berhanu and son Nethan Berhanu for their patience, inspiration, and understanding during the entire period of my study.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Barley Production in Meket District, Ethiopia
    Vol. 10(10), pp. 328-338, October 2018 DOI: 10.5897/JDAE2018.0960 Article Number: 12FCF3758529 ISSN: 2006-9774 Copyright ©2018 Journal of Development and Agricultural Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JDAE Economics Full Length Research Paper Economic efficiency of smallholder farmers in barley production in Meket district, Ethiopia Getachew Wollie1*, Lemma Zemedu2 and Bosena Tegegn2 1Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Samara University, Ethiopia. 2Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Received 10 May, 2018; Accepted 31 July, 2018 This study analyzed the economic efficiency of smallholder farmers in barley production in the case of Meket district, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. A cross sectional data collected from a sample of 123 barley producers during the 2015/2016 production season was used for the analysis. Two stages random sampling method was used to select sample respondents. The translog functional form was chosen to estimate both production and cost functions and OLS estimation method was applied to identify allocative and economic inefficiencies factors, while technical inefficiency factors were analyzed by using single stage estimation approach. The estimated stochastic production frontier model indicated input variables such as fertilizer, human labor and oxen power as significant variables that increase the quantity of barley output, while barley seed had a negative effect. The estimated mean levels of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of the sample farmers were about 70.9, 68.6 and 48.8%, respectively which revealed the presence of a room to increase their technical, allocative and economic efficiencies level on average by 29.1, 31.4 and 51.2%, respectively with the existing resources.
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (As of 13 February 2013)
    AMHARA REGION : Who Does What Where (3W) (as of 13 February 2013) Tigray Tigray Interventions/Projects at Woreda Level Afar Amhara ERCS: Lay Gayint: Beneshangul Gumu / Dire Dawa Plan Int.: Addis Ababa Hareri Save the fk Save the Save the df d/k/ CARE:f k Save the Children:f Gambela Save the Oromia Children: Children:f Children: Somali FHI: Welthungerhilfe: SNNPR j j Children:l lf/k / Oxfam GB:af ACF: ACF: Save the Save the af/k af/k Save the df Save the Save the Tach Gayint: Children:f Children: Children:fj Children:l Children: l FHI:l/k MSF Holand:f/ ! kj CARE: k Save the Children:f ! FHI:lf/k Oxfam GB: a Tselemt Save the Childrenf: j Addi Dessie Zuria: WVE: Arekay dlfk Tsegede ! Beyeda Concern:î l/ Mirab ! Concern:/ Welthungerhilfe:k Save the Children: Armacho f/k Debark Save the Children:fj Kelela: Welthungerhilfe: ! / Tach Abergele CRS: ak Save the Children:fj ! Armacho ! FHI: Save the l/k Save thef Dabat Janamora Legambo: Children:dfkj Children: ! Plan Int.:d/ j WVE: Concern: GOAL: Save the Children: dlfk Sahla k/ a / f ! ! Save the ! Lay Metema North Ziquala Children:fkj Armacho Wegera ACF: Save the Children: Tenta: ! k f Gonder ! Wag WVE: Plan Int.: / Concern: Save the dlfk Himra d k/ a WVE: ! Children: f Sekota GOAL: dlf Save the Children: Concern: Save the / ! Save: f/k Chilga ! a/ j East Children:f West ! Belesa FHI:l Save the Children:/ /k ! Gonder Belesa Dehana ! CRS: Welthungerhilfe:/ Dembia Zuria ! î Save thedf Gaz GOAL: Children: Quara ! / j CARE: WVE: Gibla ! l ! Save the Children: Welthungerhilfe: k d k/ Takusa dlfj k
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumance Cattle Production System in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is It Sustainable?
    WP14_Cover.pdf 2/12/2009 2:21:51 PM www.ipms-ethiopia.org Working Paper No. 14 Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? Azage Tegegne,* Tesfaye Mengistie, Tesfaye Desalew, Worku Teka and Eshete Dejen Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia * Corresponding author: [email protected] Authors’ affiliations Azage Tegegne, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Tesfaye Mengistie, Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia Tesfaye Desalew, Kutaber woreda Office of Agriculture and Rural Development, Kutaber, South Wello Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia Worku Teka, Research and Development Officer, Metema, Amhara Region, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Eshete Dejen, Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), P.O. Box 527, Bahir Dar, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia © 2009 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). All rights reserved. Parts of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use provided that such reproduction shall be subject to acknowledgement of ILRI as holder of copyright. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Publications Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Correct citation: Azage Tegegne, Tesfaye Mengistie, Tesfaye Desalew, Worku Teka and Eshete Dejen. 2009. Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Base-Line Survey of Rural and Urban Households in Tana Sub-Basin, Amhara National Regional State
    Socio-Economic Base-Line Survey of Rural and Urban Households in Tana Sub-Basin, Amhara National Regional State Kassahun Berhanu & Tegegne Gebre-Egziabher FSS Monograph No. 10 Forum for Social Studies (FSS) Addis Ababa © 2014 Forum for Social Studies (FSS) All rights reserved. Printed in Addis Ababa Typesetting & Layouts: Konjit Belete ISBN: 13: 978-99944-50-49-7 Forum for Social Studies (FSS) P.O. Box 25864 code 1000 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Email: [email protected] Web: www.fssethiopia.org.et This monograph has been published with the financial support of the Civil Societies Support Program (CSSP). The contents of the monograph are the sole responsibilities of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the CSSP or the FSS. Table of Contents List of Tables vii Acronyms xvii I. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Statement of the Problem 1 1.2 Objectives 9 1.3 Research Questions (Issues) 10 1.4 Methodology 11 1.4.1 Sampling 11 1.4.2 Types of Data, Data collection techniques, and 13 Data Sources 1.5 Significance and Policy Implications 15 1.6 Organization of the Report 15 II. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS OF RURAL 17 HOUSHOLDS 2.1 Age-Sex Composition 17 2.2 Household Composition and Marital Status 20 2.3 Ethnic and Religious Composition 22 2.4 Educational characteristics 22 2.5 Primary Activity 25 III. AGRICULTURE 27 3.1 Crop Production 27 3.1.1 Land Ownership 27 3.1.2 Number of Plots Owned and Average Distance 28 Traveled to Farm Plots 3.1.3 Size of holding (ha) 29 3.1.4 Other Forms of Land Holding by Respondents 30 in Study Woredas 3.1.5 Possession of Private Fallow and Grazing Land 31 3.1.6 Land Use Certification and Security of Tenure 32 3.1.7 Possession of Plough Oxen 33 3.1.8 Usage of Farm Implements 33 3.1.9 Means and Ways of Engaging in Farming 34 Activities 3.1.10 Annual Production (Base Year 2004 EC) 38 3.1.11 Use of Agricultural Inputs 38 3.1.12 Irrigated Agriculture 42 3.2 Livestock Production and Services 47 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Data/Projections, 1999 & 2000
    Census data/Projections, 1999 & 2000 Jan - June and July - December Relief Bens., Supplementary Feeding Bens. TIGRAY Zone 1994 census 1999 beneficiaries - May '99 2000 beneficiaries - Jan 2000 July - Dec 2000 Bens Zone ID/prior Wereda Total Pop. 1999 Pop. 1999 Bens. 1999 bens % 2000 Pop. 2000 Bens 2000 bens Bens. Sup. July - Dec Bens July - Dec Bens ity Estimate of Pop. Estimate % of Pop. Feeding % of pop 1 ASEGEDE TSIMBELA 96,115 111,424 114,766 1 KAFTA HUMERA 48,690 56,445 58,138 1 LAELAY ADIYABO 79,832 92,547 5,590 6% 95,324 7,800 8% 11,300 12% Western 1 MEDEBAY ZANA 97,237 112,724 116,106 2,100 2% 4,180 4% 1 TAHTAY ADIYABO 80,934 93,825 6,420 7% 96,639 18,300 19% 24,047 25% 1 TAHTAY KORARO 83,492 96,790 99,694 2,800 3% 2,800 3% 1 TSEGEDE 59,846 69,378 71,459 1 TSILEMTI 97,630 113,180 37,990 34% 116,575 43,000 37% 15,050 46,074 40% 1 WELKAIT 90,186 104,550 107,687 Sub Total 733,962 850,863 50,000 6% 876,389 74,000 8% 15,050 88,401 10% *2 ABERGELE 58,373 67,670 11,480 17% 69,700 52,200 75% 18,270 67,430 97% *2 ADWA 109,203 126,596 9,940 8% 130,394 39,600 30% 13,860 58,600 45% 2 DEGUA TEMBEN 89,037 103,218 7,360 7% 106,315 34,000 32% 11,900 44,000 41% Central 2 ENTICHO 131,168 152,060 22,850 15% 156,621 82,300 53% 28,805 92,300 59% 2 KOLA TEMBEN 113,712 131,823 12,040 9% 135,778 62,700 46% 21,945 67,700 50% 2 LAELAY MAYCHEW 90,123 104,477 3,840 4% 107,612 19,600 18% 6,860 22,941 21% 2 MEREB LEHE 78,094 90,532 14,900 16% 93,248 57,500 62% 20,125 75,158 81% *2 NAEDER ADET 84,942 98,471 15,000 15% 101,425 40,800 40% 14,280 62,803 62% 2
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire
    Ethiopia Round 6 SDP Questionnaire Always 001a. Your name: [NAME] Is this your name? ◯ Yes ◯ No 001b. Enter your name below. 001a = 0 Please record your name 002a = 0 Day: 002b. Record the correct date and time. Month: Year: ◯ TIGRAY ◯ AFAR ◯ AMHARA ◯ OROMIYA ◯ SOMALIE BENISHANGUL GUMZ 003a. Region ◯ ◯ S.N.N.P ◯ GAMBELA ◯ HARARI ◯ ADDIS ABABA ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${this_country} ◯ NORTH WEST TIGRAY ◯ CENTRAL TIGRAY ◯ EASTERN TIGRAY ◯ SOUTHERN TIGRAY ◯ WESTERN TIGRAY ◯ MEKELE TOWN SPECIAL ◯ ZONE 1 ◯ ZONE 2 ◯ ZONE 3 ZONE 5 003b. Zone ◯ ◯ NORTH GONDAR ◯ SOUTH GONDAR ◯ NORTH WELLO ◯ SOUTH WELLO ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST GOJAM ◯ WEST GOJAM ◯ WAG HIMRA ◯ AWI ◯ OROMIYA 1 ◯ BAHIR DAR SPECIAL ◯ WEST WELLEGA ◯ EAST WELLEGA ◯ ILU ABA BORA ◯ JIMMA ◯ WEST SHEWA ◯ NORTH SHEWA ◯ EAST SHEWA ◯ ARSI ◯ WEST HARARGE ◯ EAST HARARGE ◯ BALE ◯ SOUTH WEST SHEWA ◯ GUJI ◯ ADAMA SPECIAL ◯ WEST ARSI ◯ KELEM WELLEGA ◯ HORO GUDRU WELLEGA ◯ Shinile ◯ Jijiga ◯ Liben ◯ METEKEL ◯ ASOSA ◯ PAWE SPECIAL ◯ GURAGE ◯ HADIYA ◯ KEMBATA TIBARO ◯ SIDAMA ◯ GEDEO ◯ WOLAYITA ◯ SOUTH OMO ◯ SHEKA ◯ KEFA ◯ GAMO GOFA ◯ BENCH MAJI ◯ AMARO SPECIAL ◯ DAWURO ◯ SILTIE ◯ ALABA SPECIAL ◯ HAWASSA CITY ADMINISTRATION ◯ AGNEWAK ◯ MEJENGER ◯ HARARI ◯ AKAKI KALITY ◯ NEFAS SILK-LAFTO ◯ KOLFE KERANIYO 2 ◯ GULELE ◯ LIDETA ◯ KIRKOS-SUB CITY ◯ ARADA ◯ ADDIS KETEMA ◯ YEKA ◯ BOLE ◯ DIRE DAWA filter_list=${level1} ◯ TAHTAY ADIYABO ◯ MEDEBAY ZANA ◯ TSELEMTI ◯ SHIRE ENIDASILASE/TOWN/ ◯ AHIFEROM ◯ ADWA ◯ TAHTAY MAYCHEW ◯ NADER ADET ◯ DEGUA TEMBEN ◯ ABIYI ADI/TOWN/ ◯ ADWA/TOWN/ ◯ AXUM/TOWN/ ◯ SAESI TSADAMBA ◯ KLITE
    [Show full text]