DOCSLIB.ORG

King of Prussia Rail Project: Potential Funding Sources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King of Prussia Rail Project: Potential Funding Sources KING OF PRUSSIA RAIL PROJECT: POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES August 2016 DRAFT REPORT SUBMITTED TO: Mr. Byron S. Comati Director of Strategic Planning Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) DRAFT REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Econsult Solutions 1435 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Econsult Solutions, Inc.| 1435 Walnut Street, 4th Floor | Philadelphia, PA 19102 | 215-717-2777 | econsultsolutions.com SEPTA| Funding the King of Prussia Norristown High Speed Line Extension | Draft Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Organization of the Report......................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Funding Context ................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Federal Funding and Financing Sources ........................................................................... 5 2.1 Potential Funding Sources .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Financing Tools ........................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 13 3.0 State Funding Sources ........................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Potential Funding Sources ........................................................................................ 16 3.2 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.0 Regional Sources ................................................................................................................ 20 4.1 Regional Funding Sources Across the Nation ........................................................ 21 4.2 Regional Funding Sources For Greater Philadelphia ............................................ 23 4.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 28 5.0 Local (County/Municipality) Sources ............................................................................... 31 5.1 Potential Funding Sources ........................................................................................ 31 5.2 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 34 6.0 Value Capture Analysis ...................................................................................................... 35 6.1 Value Capture Approaches .................................................................................... 35 6.2 Potential Value Capture Yields ................................................................................ 36 6.2.1 Scenarios Evaluated ............................................................................................. 37 6.2.2 Value Capture Results........................................................................................... 37 6.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 38 7.0 Other Sources ...................................................................................................................... 40 7.1 EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program............................................................................. 40 7.2 Public Private Partnerships ........................................................................................ 40 7.3 Emission Trading ......................................................................................................... 41 7.3.1 NOX Trading ............................................................................................................ 41 7.3.2 Carbon Offset Trading .......................................................................................... 42 7.3.3 RIN Trading .............................................................................................................. 42 7.4 Private Contributions ................................................................................................. 43 8.0 Case Studies ........................................................................................................................ 44 Econsult Solutions | 1435 Walnut Street, 4th Floor | Philadelphia, PA 19102 | 215.717.2777 | econsultsolutions.com SEPTA| Funding the King of Prussia Norristown High Speed Line Extension | Draft Report 8.1 Case Studies ............................................................................................................... 44 8.2 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 51 9.0 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 53 Appendix A – Methodology for Revenue Potential Calculations............................................ 1 Sales Tax ........................................................................................................................ 1 Real Estate Transfer Tax ............................................................................................... 2 Property Tax Surcharge ............................................................................................... 2 Tolls ................................................................................................................................. 3 VMT Tax/Fee ................................................................................................................. 5 Regional Gas Sales Tax ............................................................................................... 6 Income Tax ................................................................................................................. 11 Earned Income Tax Surcharge ................................................................................ 12 Appendix B – Methodology for Bondable Revenue Projections ........................................... 12 Appendix C – Maps of Potential Alignments ............................................................................ 14 Appendix D – Value Capture Methodology ............................................................................ 21 Econsult Solutions | 1435 Walnut Street, 4th Floor | Philadelphia, PA 19102 | 215.717.2777 | econsultsolutions.com i SEPTA| Funding the King of Prussia Norristown High Speed Line Extension | Draft Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is evaluating alternative alignments to extend the Norristown High Speed Line (NHSL) to provide faster and more reliable public transit service between destinations in King of Prussia and the 69th Street Transportation Center in Upper Darby. This is known as the Norristown Transportation Center (KOP Rail Project). The expected capital cost of the project is approximately $1.1 billion in 2015 dollars and $1.3 billion anticipated at the time of construction.1 The Federal Transit Administration’s New Starts program, which has traditionally been a major funding source for new rail transit projects, will fund at most, one half of the capital cost. The remainder of the funding must come from other sources. This report provides information to help regional leaders make informed decisions about how federal, state, and local sources can be used to fund the region’s transportation future. It is not intended to develop a specific funding plan for the KOP Rail Project, but rather to provide a menu of funding options for this and other potential projects. This report identifies numerous funding sources and it is clear that there is sufficient funding potential within the state and region to fund the non-Federal portion of the KOP Rail project and other projects. It is also clear that there is no “magic bullet” or existing funding source that can be relied upon for this purpose and future work with project stakeholders and political leaders will decide which of the identified sources work best for the project and for the region. Any regional funding system will require regional agreement about transportation funding priorities. Developing regional consensus on these issues is an important step for the region to implement projects such as the KOP Rail Project. Regions in the US have taken a wide variety of approaches to regional public transit funding – no two projects are ever developed the same way – but communities often combine multiple sources to fund transit expansion projects.2 Figure ES.1 summarizes the mix of federal, state, and local funding for recent comparable projects. Potential funding sources for the Philadelphia region include: the Federal Government, State Government, regional sources, and local sources. 1 The expected capital costs are for a year-of-expenditure of 2020 and represent the average cost of the five alternatives under consideration. 2 See Section 8 for a selection of case studies of the funding sources used for other large-scale transit projects. Econsult Solutions | 1435 Walnut
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Relations Manager Atlanta Streetcar
    CITY OF ATLANTA 55 TRINITY Ave, S.W Kasim Reed ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30335-0300 Sonji Jacobs Dade Mayor Director of Communications City of Atlanta TEL (404) 330-6004 City of Atlanta Public Relations Manager Atlanta Streetcar Title: Public Relations Manager Department: Atlanta Streetcar / Department of Public Works Supervisor: Tim Borchers, Executive Director, Atlanta Streetcar Interested candidates should submit a cover letter and resume to [email protected] no later than Friday, September 13, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. About the Atlanta Streetcar The Atlanta Streetcar is the first phase of a comprehensive, regional streetcar and transit system in the City of Atlanta and the region to address issues of transportation, land use, smart growth, and sustainability while providing last-mile connectivity to riders. The Atlanta Streetcar is a modern, ADA compliant, electrically powered transit system. The streetcar will run for 2.7 miles in the heart of Atlanta’s downtown, business, tourism and convention corridor connecting Centennial Olympic Park area with the vibrant Sweet Auburn and Edgewood Avenue districts. The Atlanta Streetcar project is a cooperative effort by the City of Atlanta, the Atlanta Downtown Improvement District (ADID) and MARTA. The streetcar will run through the heart of Atlanta's business, tourism and convention corridor, bringing jobs and new economic development to the city. Public Relations Manager Overview The Atlanta Streetcar seeks an energetic and articulate Public Relations Director for our press initiatives. The Public Relations Manager will be the primary spokesperson for the Atlanta Streetcar. S/he will work with our staff and partners to build and undertake communications strategies that keep the public informed on the construction and operation of the Streetcar.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Streetcar System Plan
    FINAL REPORT | Atlanta BeltLine/ Atlanta Streetcar System Plan This page intentionally left blank. FINAL REPORT | Atlanta BeltLine/ Atlanta Streetcar System Plan Acknowledgements The Honorable Mayor Kasim Reed Atlanta City Council Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Staff Ceasar C. Mitchell, President Paul Morris, FASLA, PLA, President and Chief Executive Officer Carla Smith, District 1 Lisa Y. Gordon, CPA, Vice President and Chief Kwanza Hall, District 2 Operating Officer Ivory Lee Young, Jr., District 3 Nate Conable, AICP, Director of Transit and Cleta Winslow, District 4 Transportation Natalyn Mosby Archibong, District 5 Patrick Sweeney, AICP, LEED AP, PLA, Senior Project Alex Wan, District 6 Manager Transit and Transportation Howard Shook, District 7 Beth McMillan, Director of Community Engagement Yolanda Adrean, District 8 Lynnette Reid, Senior Community Planner Felicia A. Moore, District 9 James Alexander, Manager of Housing and C.T. Martin, District 10 Economic Development Keisha Lance Bottoms, District 11 City of Atlanta Staff Joyce Sheperd, District 12 Tom Weyandt, Senior Transportation Policy Advisor, Michael Julian Bond, Post 1 at Large Office of the Mayor Mary Norwood, Post 2 at Large James Shelby, Commissioner, Department of Andre Dickens, Post 3 at Large Planning & Community Development Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Board Charletta Wilson Jacks, Director of Planning, Department of Planning & Community The Honorable Kasim Reed, Mayor, City of Atlanta Development John Somerhalder, Chairman Joshuah Mello, AICP, Assistant Director of Planning Elizabeth B. Chandler, Vice Chair – Transportation, Department of Planning & Earnestine Garey, Secretary Community Development Cynthia Briscoe Brown, Atlanta Board of Education, Invest Atlanta District 8 At Large Brian McGowan, President and Chief Executive The Honorable Emma Darnell, Fulton County Board Officer of Commissioners, District 5 Amanda Rhein, Interim Managing Director of The Honorable Andre Dickens, Atlanta City Redevelopment Councilmember, Post 3 At Large R.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Auburn Executive Summary.Indd
    Central Atlanta Progress Atlanta Downtown Improvement District City of Atlanta EastsideEastside // AuburnAuburn FocusFocus AreaArea EXECUTIVEEXECUTIVE SUMMARYSUMMARY OctoberOctober 20042004 Prepared by: Eastside / Auburn Urban Collage, Inc. Prepared by: Urban Cooper Collage, Carry,Inc. in association URS Corp., with ZVA, ZHA, HPE, Verge Studios, Biscuit Studios and PEQ Cooper Carry, URS Corp., ZVA, ZHA, HPE, Verge Studios, Biscuit Studios and PEQ OVERVIEW / ISSUES Overview Sweet Auburn is the historical African-American heart of Atlanta, and Auburn Avenue is its Peachtree Street. In January through March of 2004, Sweet Auburn was studied as a part of the ‘Eastside / Auburn Avenue’ Focus Area, one of five such areas included in the “Imagine Downtown” planning and visioning process. An Eastside / Auburn Core Team of institutions, businesses, property owners and residents in the area was convened to review existing conditions, define issues for discussion, review plan products and prioritize implementation steps. In addition, one-on-one interviews were held with many of the stakeholders in the corridor and over 60 people participated in the Community Workshop held on December 9, 2003. Focus Area Context The Eastside/ Auburn Avenue Focus Area is located just east of Atlanta’s Central Business District. The Auburn corridor is approximately one mile long, anchored by a high-density commercial area around Peachtree Street on the west and the Martin Luther King Jr. National Historic Site (NHS) on the east. John Wesley Dobbs Avenue and Edgewood Avenue form the northern and southern boundaries of the Focus Area, which is about six blocks at its widest point where in jogs along Gilmore Street to include a part of Grady Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Streetcar Corridor and Recommendations to Implement the Final Strategy
    Advisory Services to Provide Insight Regarding the Development Opportunities within the Atlanta Streetcar Corridor and Recommendations to Implement the Final Strategy. June 2012 ULI Atlanta 300 Galleria Parkway, Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30339 (770) 951-8500 www.uliatlanta.org Technical Assistance Program ULI – The Urban Land Institute ULI ATLANTA The Urban Land Institute (ULI) was established in 1936 and has over 30,000 members from more than 90 countries. It TAPS COMMITTEE MEMBERS is one of America’s most respected resources of infor- mation and knowledge on urban planning, growth and de- Robert Newcomer velopment. ULI is a non-profit research and education or- (Chair) ganization. Its mission is to provide leadership in the re- sponsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriv- Constance Callahan ing communities worldwide. To encourage an open ex- (Vice Chair) change of ideas and sharing experiences, ULI membership represents the entire spectrum of land use and real estate Stephen Arms development disciplines, working in private enterprise and Kerry Blind public service. Among its members there are developers, builders, property owners, investors, architects, planners, Jan Bozeman public officials, brokers, appraisers, attorneys, engineers, John Cheek financiers, academics, students and marketing and brand Kevin Clark identity experts. Chris Hall Josh Herndon Steven Hinkle Sarah Kirsch ULI Atlanta Jerrold L. Miller With over 1,000 members throughout Georgia, Alabama Darryl Moss and Eastern Tennessee, ULI Atlanta is one of the largest William Norris District Councils of the Urban Land Institute. We bring to- Amanda Rhein gether leaders from across the fields of real estate and John Rhodes land use policy to exchange best practices and serve com- Jay Silverman munity needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlanta Streetcar: an Analysis of Its Development and Growth As It Relates to the Core Cognitive Structure of the City
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Art and Design Faculty Publications Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design 2012 The Atlanta Streetcar: An Analysis of Its Development and Growth As It Relates To the Core Cognitive Structure of the City Dawn Haynie Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/art_design_facpub Part of the Architecture Commons, and the Art and Design Commons Recommended Citation Haynie, Dawn. “The Atlanta Streetcar: an analysis of its development and growth as it relates to the Core Cognitive Structure of the City,” 8th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings, Santiago, Chile January 2012. This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Art and Design Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. S. Dawn Haynie Accepted Submission to SSS8 Santiago Chile as a Long Paper and Presentation Georgia Institute of Technology College of Architecture 247 Fourth Street Atlanta, GA 30319 USA [email protected] The Atlanta Streetcar: an analysis of its development and growth as it relates to the Core Cognitive Structure of the City Conference Theme Historical Evolution of the Built Form Keywords: Atlanta; urban history; public transportation Abstract As shown previously by the work of Haynie & Peponis at the 7th Space Syntax Symposium in 2009, the spatial structure of the city of Atlanta has shifted significantly as the city grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transit Signals Operating Rules and Procedures
    APTA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM APTA RT-OP-SP-006-03 Rev 3 RAIL STANDARD Originally Published: June 8, 2003 American Public Transportation Association First Revision: July 26, 2004 1300 I Street, NW, Suite 1200 East, Washington, DC, 20005 Second Revision: December 2012 Third Revision: October 8, 2018 APTA Rail Transit Operating Practices Working Group Rail Transit Signals Operating Rules and Procedures Abstract: This Rail Standard provides guidance for the development of rail transit system (RTS) operating rules and procedures pertaining to signals. It outlines the wide variety of signal systems and the requirements for rules pertaining to their operation. Keywords: automatic block system, automatic train control, automatic train operation, automatic train protection, block, block signal, cab signal, call-on, fail safe, fail soft, signal indication, interlocking, permissive block, positive stop, restricted speed, signal, timing signal, non-shunting equipment, vital function. Summary: This standard establishes requirements for operating rules and procedures governing rail transit signal systems. It was developed to help rail transit systems apply and utilize train control signal technology to enhance safe, efficient train operation through the application of operating rules and procedures. Development of clear, system-specific rules and procedures will enhance the safety of employees and the riding public while promoting the most effective use of RTS resources. Scope and purpose: This standard addresses train control signals as they relate to rules and procedures for train operations and their applications in RTSs. This standard addresses operating rules related to fixed signals and signs that can be considered as part of the train control system. It also addresses operating rules related to traffic “bar” signals and other “informational” signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Poncey-Highland Historic District (HD)
    ATTACHMENT “A” TO NOMINATION RESOLUTION C I T Y O F A T L A N T A KEISHA LANCE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING TIM KEANE BOTTTOMS 55 TRINITY AVENUE, S.W. SUITE 3350 – ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-0308 Commissioner MAYOR 404-330-6145 – FAX: 404-658-7491 www.atlantaga.gov Kevin Bacon, AIA, AICP Interim Director OFFICE OF DESIGN KEISHA LANCE BOTTTOMS MAYOR Designation Report for: KEISHA LANCE BOTTTOMS MAYOR Poncey-Highland Historic District (HD) KEISHAApplication LANCE Number: N-19-579 (D-19-579) BOTTTOMS MAYOR Proposed Category of Designation: Historic District (HD) Zoning Categories at Time of Designation: C-1, C-1-C, C-2-C, C-3-C, I-1-C, MR-5A, MRC-2-C, MRC-3-C, PD-H, PD-MU, R-4, R-4B-C, R-5, R-5-C, RG-1, RG-2, RG-2-C, RG-3, RG-3-C, RG-4, R-LC-C, SPI-6 SA1, SPI-6 SA4, Historic District (HD), Landmark Building/Site (LBS), and Beltline Zoning Overlay. District: 14 Land Lots: 15, 16, 17, & 18 County: Fulton NPU: N Council District: 2 Eligibility Criteria Met: Group I: 2 (Three (3) total criteria - if qualifying under this group alone, at least one (1) criterion must be met) Group II: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13 and 14 (Fourteen (14) total criteria - if qualifying under this group alone, at least five (5) criteria must be met) Group III: 2 and 3 (Three (3) total criteria - if qualifying under this group alone, at least one (1) criterion must be met, as well as least three (3) criteria from Groups I and II) N-19-579 / D-19-579 Designation Report for the Poncey-Highland Historic District (HD) Page 1 of 74 ATTACHMENT “A” TO NOMINATION RESOLUTION N-19-579 / D-19-579 Designation Report for the Poncey-Highland Historic District (HD) Page 2 of 74 ATTACHMENT “A” TO NOMINATION RESOLUTION Designation Report Sections 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 SSO Workshop Introduction of Ssoas
    2018 SSO Program Workshop Introduction of State Safety Oversight Agency Attendees Dr. Alfonz Ruth Office of Administration Federal Transit Administration May 15, 2018 ARIZONA Arizona Department of Transportation Valley Metro Valley Metro Rail Light Rail Streetcar* City of Tucson Sun Link Streetcar 2 ARKANSAS Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Rock Region Metro Metro Streetcar Streetcar 3 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Bay Area Rapid Transit BART Heavy Rail Automated Guideway Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Rail Light Rail Heavy Rail North County Transit District SPRINTER Hybrid Rail Orange County Transportation Authority OC Streetcar Streetcar* Continued on Next Page 4 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. Riverfront Authority Downtown Riverfront Streetcar Streetcar* Sacramento Regional Transit District Regional Transit Light Rail San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Trolley Light Rail 5 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Muni Metro Light Rail Cable Car Streetcar Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Light Rail 6 COLORADO Colorado Public Utilities Commission Regional Transportation District RTD Rail Light Rail 7 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. Fire and Emergency Management Services D.C. Department of Transportation DC Streetcar Streetcar 8 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Tri-State Oversight Committee Metrorail Safety Commission
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    BUTLER - AUBURN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE May 2005 Prepared for: The City of Atlanta Prepared by: Urban Collage, Inc. / Huntley & Associates / Market + Main Butler - Auburn Redevelopment Plan Update Credits and Acknowledgements Our thanks to the following people for their vision and leadership throughout the redevelopment planning process. City of Atlanta Bureau of Planning James E. Shelby, Acting Comissioner Beverly M. Dockeray-Ojo, Director Flor Velarde, Principal Planner Garnett Brown, Principal Planner Urban Design Commission Karen Huebner, Executive Director Doug Young, Public Information Offi cer Butler-Auburn Leadership Team Project Management Mtamanika Youngblood, Historic District Development Corporation Kwanza Hall, Atlanta Public Schools / Mactec Working Group Frank Catroppa, National Park Service, M. L. King National Historic Site Chuck Lewis, Citizen’s Trust Bank David Patton, NPU-M Janice Perkins, Odd Fellows Building Tony Pope, Architect Consultant Team Stan Harvey, AICP, Principal, Urban Collage, Inc. John Skach, AIA, AICP, Project Manager, Urban Collage, Inc. Bob Begle, Principal Urban Designer, Urban Collage, Inc. Matt Cherry, Project Planner, Urban Collage, Inc. Alix Wilcox, Project Planner, Urban Collage, Inc. Carolina Blenghini, Project Intern, Urban Collage, Inc. Carlos Garcia, Project Intern, Urban Collage, Inc. Kim Brown, Associate, Huntley & Associates Rick Padgett, Associate, Huntley & Associates Aaron Fortner, Principal, Market & Main Butler - Auburn Redevelopment Plan Update 1 Volume One Table of Contents Preface
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation: TIS Quarterly Briefing, December 14, 2010
    Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Quarterly Briefing – Transit Update Agenda 1. NtiNational TitTransit UdtUpdate 2. Regional Sales Tax Briefing 3. Atlanta BeltLine Transit Implementation Strategy 4. Next Steps December 14, 2010 National Transit Update New Rail Systems 1950s to 2010 1960s to 1980s –Heavy Rail Atlanta San Francisco Bay Area Washington, DC 1980s to 2000s – Light Rail Portland Seattle San Diego DllDallas The Gold Line Light Rail in Los Angeles, California Denver Charlotte National Transit Update Light Rail Project Example •Project Characteristics: • Service began June 2004 • 12 miles with 17 stations, LRT; 30,500 daily riders • Fares consistent with underlying bus network • Capital cost of approximately $675m with two separate contracts for vehicles and rail/systems • Lessons Learned: • Communications & Community Relations was a challenge during implementation • Contract packaging and joint development (Metro/MnDOT) created interface issues • Line has proven to be a powerful catalyst for dldevelopmen t in a corridor Hiawatha Line, Minneapolis National Transit Update 2000 – 2010 Streetcar Projects Re‐emerge National Transit Update Streetcar Project Example Project Characteristics: Service began July 2001 4 miles (8‐mile loop) streetcar system with 46 stops Serves the surrounding downtown 12,000 daily riders, 23% commuter service The system is owned by the City of Portland; managed by Portland Streetcar Inc., a non‐profit public benefit corporation whose board of directors report to the city's Office of Transportation; and operated and maintained by local transit authority, TriMet. Capital cost of approximately $103,150,000 Lessons Learned: • The first new streetcar system in the U.S. since World War II to use modern vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Age Return of Transit Article 10-13-20
    Transit, Six Months After COVID-19: A Progress Report Written by David Peter Alan, Contributing Editor Transit is fighting its way back, after devastating decreases in ridership and revenue last spring, which necessitated severe service reductions on many lines and throughout many systems. Today, many of those systems are increasing service, both because many of the remaining riders need it, and in the hope that riders from the pre-COVID era will come back. Offices are re-opening slowly and carefully in some transit-rich cities, and many venues that historically attracted tourists (even if only for a day trip) are still shut down. Wherever it is located, transit must fight a protracted battle to remain relevant and regain some of the ground it captured during the past several decades, and then lost during the past several months. In this report, we will look at how transit providers in the US and Canada are doing, especially with respect to the amount of service they are offering. Some providers are back to offering the level of service that they offered before the virus hit. Others still offer reduced service, while some lines are still shut down completely. How is your local transit provider doing these days? Read on and find out. The Northeast: Where there is still plenty of transit, but not plenty of money to run it The Northeast is the home of three of the nation’s legacy rail systems (Boston, the New York area, and Philadelphia), a number of newer rail lines and systems, and Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor (NEC) to connect most of them.
    [Show full text]