DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Riverview Commons, Hillsborough County, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Riverview Commons, Hillsborough County, Florida CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE RIVERVIEW COMMONS, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: 2nd Wave Development 5300 W. Cypress Street, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33607 Prepared by: Florida’s First Choice in Cultural Resource Management Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 (941) 379-6206 August 2018 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE RIVERVIEW COMMONS, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: 2nd Wave Development 5300 W. Cypress Street, Suite 200 Tampa, Florida 33607 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Marion Almy – Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath – Project Archaeologist Garth Kaulens – Archaeologist August 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) performed a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) of the ±35-acre Riverview Commons property in Hillsborough County for 2nd Wave Development. The purpose of this investigation was to locate and identify any cultural resources within the project Area of Potential Effects (APE) and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). As defined in 36 CFR Part § 800.16(d), the APE is the “geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist.” Based on the scale and nature of the activities, the project has a limited potential for any indirect (visual or audible) or cumulative effects outside the immediate footprint of construction. Therefore, the archaeological and historical APE are limited to the footprint of proposed activities within the existing boundaries of the project. The CRAS, completed in August 2018, was conducted at the request of the Florida Division of Historic Resources (FDHR), who reviewed this project in accordance with Chapters 267.061 and 373.414, Florida Statutes, and implementing state regulations, for possible effects on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the NRHP, or otherwise of historical, architectural, or archaeological value (Parsons 2018) (Appendix A). All work was carried out in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and its implementing regulations in 36 CFR Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties, and in conformity with the standards contained in the FDHR’s Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (FDHR 2003). The resulting report meets specifications in Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code. A review of the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) and NRHP indicated that no archaeological sites have been recorded within the property, but seven have been recorded within one mile. The property was assigned a moderate to low archaeological potential (Janus Research 2004). The types of sites expected would be small lithic and/or artifact scatters. However, as the property has been used for agricultural purposes over the last 60 years, any shallow archaeological deposits would have been destroyed. As a result of these investigations, no archaeological sites were discovered. A review of the FMSF and NRHP revealed that no historic buildings, bridges, cemeteries, or NRHP-listed sites are located within or adjacent to the property. The Property Appraiser and the review of the historic aerial photographs revealed no potential for historic structures on the property (Henriquez 2018; USDA 1938, 1948, 1957a, 1957b, 1968, 1982). Field investigations confirmed the absence of historic resources within the project APE. Based on the background research and survey results, it is the professional opinion of ACI that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on any archaeological sites or historic resources that are listed, eligible for listing, or that appear potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Location and Setting .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Physiography and Geology ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Soils and Vegetation .................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4 Paleoenvironmental Considerations .......................................................................... 2-4 3.0 CULTURAL CHRONOLOGY ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Paleoindian ................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.2 Archaic ...................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Formative .................................................................................................................. 3-4 3.4 Mississippian ............................................................................................................. 3-6 3.5 Colonialism ............................................................................................................... 3-7 3.6 Territorial and Statehood ........................................................................................... 3-7 3.7 Civil War and Aftermath ......................................................................................... 3-10 3.8 Twentieth Century ................................................................................................... 3-12 3.9 Project APE Specifics ............................................................................................. 3-14 4.0 RESEARCH CONSIDERATIONS AND METHODS ..................................................... 4-1 4.1 Archaeological Considerations .................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Historical/Architectural Considerations .................................................................... 4-7 4.3 Field Methodology .................................................................................................... 4-8 4.4 Inadvertent/Unexpected Discovery of Cultural Remains .......................................... 4-8 4.5 Laboratory Methods and Curation ............................................................................ 4-9 5.0 SURVEY RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Archaeological Survey Results ................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Historical/Architectural Survey Results .................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................... 5-1 6.0 REFERENCES CITED ....................................................................................................... 6-1 APPENDICES Appendix A SHPO correspondence Appendix B Survey log ii LIST OF FIGURES AND PHOTOS Figure Page Figure 1.1. Location of the APE. ...................................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 2.1. Environmental setting of the APE. ................................................................................. 2-2 Figure 2.2. Soil types within the APE. ............................................................................................. 2-4 Figure 3.1. Florida archaeological regions. ...................................................................................... 3-1 Figure 3.2. 1848 plat showing the location of the APE. ................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3.3. 1938 and 1982 aerial photographs showing the APE. .................................................. 3-15 Figure 4.1. Location of the previously recorded archaeological sites proximate to the APE. .......... 4-3 Figure 4.2. Distribution of sites by elevation (ft amsl). .................................................................... 4-5 Figure 5.1. Location of the shovel tests within the APE. ................................................................. 5-2 Table Table 2.1. Soil types within the APE. ............................................................................................. 2-3 Table 4.1. Previously recorded archaeological sites proximate to the APE. ................................... 4-1 Table 4.2. CRAS projects conducted proximate to the project APE. .............................................. 4-1 Table 4.3. Site distribution by water type and distance. .................................................................. 4-4 Table 4.4. Site distribution by drainage class and soil type within the Gulf Coastal Lowland. ...... 4-5 Photo Photo 2.1. Project setting. ................................................................................................................ 2-1 Photo 2.2. Oaks along drainage. ...................................................................................................... 2-3 iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) performed a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) of the ±35-acre Riverview Commons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank, Hillsborough County, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE WIGGINS PRAIRIE MITIGATION BANK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: Southern States Land & Timber, LLC 2205 W. Pinhook Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 Prepared by: Florida’s First Choice in Cultural Resource Management Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 (941) 379-6206 Toll Free: 1-800-735-9906 November 2016 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE WIGGINS PRAIRIE MITIGATION BANK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: Southern States Land & Timber, LLC 2205 W. Pinhook Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Marion Almy – Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath – Project Archaeologist Katherine Baar – Archaeologist November 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) performed a cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) of 79 acres of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank for Southern States Land & Timber, LLC in October 2016. Portions of the 492-acre parcel had been previously surveyed, and the current investigations focused on those areas where subsurface disturbance is anticipated. The purpose of the survey was to locate and identify any archaeological sites and historic resources within the project area of potential effects (APE) and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The archaeological APE consists of those lands that will be subject to subsurface disturbance and have not previously been surveyed for cultural resources. The historical APE consists of the entire property. The survey was requested by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), who reviewed U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) file number SAJ-2016-00429-TMF (Parsons 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY FOR THE SEIR FOR WIDENING U.S. 301 FROM FALKENBURG ROAD TO CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD Hillsborough County, Florida Prepared for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 Prepared by Janus Research 1300 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33607 FINAL REPORT CRAS for the SEIR for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard Hillsborough County November 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) for the State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard in Hillsborough County, Florida was undertaken at the request of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The objective of this survey, which was conducted in November, 2006, was to identify cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area and assess their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) according to the criteria set forth in 36 CFR Section 60.4. This assessment was designed and implemented to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended) as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties, effective January 2001); Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 USC 4321 et seq.), as implemented by the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508); Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 USC 303); Chapter 267, Florida Statutes; and the minimum field methods, data analysis, and reporting standards embodied in the Florida Division of Historical Resources’ (FDHR) Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (February 2003), and Chapter 1A-46 (Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines), Florida Administrative Code.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Cubans
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Cubans and the Caribbean South: Race, Labor, and Cuban Identity in Southern Florida, 1868-1928 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Andrew Gomez 2015 © Copyright by Andrew Gomez 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Cubans and the Caribbean South: Race, Labor, and Cuban Identity in Southern Florida, 1868- 1928 by Andrew Gomez Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Frank Tobias Higbie, Chair This dissertation looks at the Cuban cigar making communities of Key West and Ybor City (in present-day Tampa) from 1868 to 1928. During this period, both cities represented two of largest Cuban exile centers and played critical roles in the Cuban independence movement and the Clear Havana cigar industry. I am charting how these communities wrestled with race, labor politics, and their own Cuban identity. Broadly speaking, my project makes contributions to the literature on Cuban history, Latino history, and transnational studies. My narrative is broken into two chronological periods. The earlier period (1868-1898) looks at Southern Florida and Cuba as a permeable region where ideas, people, and goods flowed freely. I am showing how Southern Florida was constructed as an extension of Cuba and that workers were part of broader networks tied to Cuban nationalism and Caribbean radicalism. Borne out of Cuba’s independence struggles, both communities created a political and literary atmosphere that argued for an egalitarian view of a new republic. Concurrently, workers began to ii experiment with labor organizing. Cigar workers at first tried to reconcile the concepts of nationalism and working-class institutions, but there was considerable friction between the two ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Work Plan for the Proposed Levy Nuclear Plant Project, Levy, Citrus, Marion, Hernando, Sumter, Polk, Hillsborough, and Pinellas Counties, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCES WORK PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED LEVY NUCLEAR PLANT PROJECT, LEVY, CITRUS, MARION, HERNANDO, SUMTER, POLK, HILLSBOROUGH, AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA MASTER CONTRACT # 442498-003 PREPARED FOR PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. BY MICHAEL A. ARBUTHNOT, M.S., ROBERT AUSTIN, PH.D., JOSH TORRES, M.A., AND NICHOLAS J. LINVILLE, M.A. CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMILY M. POWLEN, M.S., MEG GAILLARD, M.A., TRAVIS FULK, M.A., AND CHRIS ALTES, B.A. MICHAEL ARBUTHNOT, M.S., RPA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR ROBERT AUSTIN, PH.D., RPA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC. WWW.SEARCHINC.COM APRIL 2011 This page intentionally left blank. Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. April 2011 Work Plan for the Proposed LNP Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. (SEARCH) prepared this work plan at the request of Progress Energy Florida (PEF) pursuant to the requirements outlined in two Conditions of Certification (COCs) from the Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources (FDHR). PEF will add 180 circuit miles of transmission lines across multiple counties in Florida in order to maintain reliability and move energy efficiently to customers throughout the region and state, where service demands are anticipated to grow by 25% over the next decade. This technical document provides a cultural resources desktop evaluation and work plan for the Levy Nuclear Plant (LNP) Project, which includes seven preferred rights-of-way (ROW) and three accessory parcels totaling 149 miles of preferred ROW and 246 acres, respectively. The project area extends through portions of eight counties: Levy, Citrus, Marion, Hernando, Sumter, Polk, Hillsborough, and Pinellas. This document includes an overview of the natural environment to identify areas best suited to prehistoric land use, and archival and cartographic research to identify areas of historic settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Florida During the Mississippi Period
    2 ......... Southwest Florida during the Mississippi Period WILLIAM H. MARQUARDT AND KAREN J. WALKER This book focuses on the Mississippi period, ca. A.D. 1000 to 1500. In the archaeology of the southeastern United States, "Mississippian" generally means chiefdom-level societies that "practiced a maize-based agriculture, constructed (generally) platform mounds for elite residences and vari- ous corporate and public functions, and shared, to a considerable extent, a common suite of artifact types and styles, particularly in the realm of pottery (usually shell-tempered) and certain symbolic or prestige related artifacts" (Welch and Butler 2006: 2). Often implicit is an assumption that Mississippian chiefdoms represent the most complex cultural develop- ments in t he aboriginal southeastern United States. In southwest Florida, their contemporaries had no maize agriculture, constructed no platform mounds, and made a rather undistinguished pot- tery. Even so, Spaniards who encountered the historic Calusa in the six- teenth century observed a stratified society divided into nobles and com- moners, with hereditary leadership, tributary patronage-clientage that extended throughout south Florida, ritual and military specialists, far- ranging trade, an accomplished and expressive artistic tradition, complex religious beliefs and ritual practices, and effective subsistence practices that supported thousands of people and allowed a sedentary residence pattern (Fontaneda 1973; Hann 1991; Solis de Meras 1964). Furthermore, for nearly two centuries after contact, the Calusa maintained their identity and beliefs, effectively repulsing European attempts to conquer and con- vert them to Christianity, while many southeastern United States chief- doms were in cultural ruin within a few decades (Hann 1991). The Calusa heartland was in the coastal region encompassing Charlotte Harbor, Pine Island Sound, San Carlos Bay, and Estero Bay (figure 2.1).
    [Show full text]
  • CRAS) Report Volume 1 of 2
    Final Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) Report Volume 1 of 2 January 2014 Introduction Revised January 2017 US 41(SR 45) From Kracker Avenue to South of SR 676 (Causeway Boulevard), Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study Final Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) Report – Volume 1 of 2 Work Program Item Segment No. 430056 1 ETDM Project No. 5180 Hillsborough County, Florida Prepared for: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT SEVEN Prepared by: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. In association with: American Consulting Engineers of Florida, LLC January 2014 Introduction Revised January 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) conducted a Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study to evaluate alternative improvements for US 41 (SR 45) from Kracker Avenue (milepoint 15.784) to south of SR 676 (Causeway Boulevard – milepoint 22.791) in Hillsborough County (Figure 1-1), a distance of approximately 7.0 miles. Study objectives included: determine proposed typical sections and develop preliminary conceptual design plans for proposed improvements, while minimizing impacts to the environment; consider agency and public comments; and ensure project compliance with all applicable federal and state laws. Improvement alternatives were identified which will improve safety and satisfy future transportation demand. A State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared for this study and approved on January 12, 2017. This Cultural Resource Assessment Survey Report (CRAS) was prepared as part of this PD&E study. This project was conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and Chapter 267, Florida Statutes. It was carried out in conformity with Part 2, Chapter 12 (Archaeological and Historical Resources) of the FDOT PD&E Manual and the standards contained in the Florida Division of Historical Resources’ (FDHR) Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (FDHR 2003; FDOT 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington Park Residents From: Karin Murphy, Director of Urban Design
    To: Arlington Park Residents From: Karin Murphy, Director of Urban Design Studio Date: February 1, 2016 Re: Arlington Park Neighborhood Association - Form-based Code Updates The attached materials were distributed to the attendees of the Arlington Park Neighborhood Meeting held on Tuesday, January 19, 2016. These materials were used as part of an interactive discussion of the status of the Form-based Code (FBC), to receive feedback, and to discuss continued opportunities for participation. Also included for discussion was the potential code amendment language requested by the neighborhood to address façade/frontage requirements for single family lots within the neighborhood. Materials distributed included language originally discussed as well as alternative language provided by Neighborhood and Development Services Staff. The discussion included the possibility of the amendment proceeding independently of the FBC process as part of an upcoming text amendment that NDS is processing. Arlington Park Form-based Code Status Update January 19, 2016 We are in the process of completing the most significant component of the City of Sarasota’s Form- Based Code, which are the City-Wide Zoning Map and Draft Special Requirements Plans. All other modules and sections of the code are built upon these maps. We had hoped to have completed this work in the fall of 2015, but unfortunately we have had to do a significant audit of the existing maps and data sets in order to create the new zones and geographic information system maps. As we have been creating and proofing the maps, we also spent 2015 finishing walking audits and public outreach events so all of the City’s neighborhoods, property owners and stakeholders have been given the opportunity to participate in public outreach events and sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Late Woodland Climate of Old Tampa Bay, Florida
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2019 Investigating The Late Woodland Climate Of Old Tampa Bay, Florida Jaime Rogers University of Central Florida Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Rogers, Jaime, "Investigating The Late Woodland Climate Of Old Tampa Bay, Florida" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6685. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6685 INVESTIGATING THE LATE WOODLAND CLIMATE OF OLD TAMPA BAY, FLORIDA by JAIME AUSTIN ROGERS B.S. University of Central Florida, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2019 ` ABSTRACT Tampa Bay and the broader Central Gulf Coast region of Florida bear evidence of site reduction and population decline during the onset of the Late Woodland period (AD 500-1000). Concomitantly, Weeden Island culture flourished to the north, while climatic instability loomed to the south. It is unclear if the site abandonments in the area between the two are related to social or cultural change, an unstable climate, or a combination thereof. Interdisciplinary research has provided evidence for climate change and sea level regression during the sixth and seventh centuries in Southwest Florida, but these variables have yet to be investigated in Tampa Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Race, Nation, and Popular Culture in Cuban New York City and Miami, 1940-1960
    Authentic Assertions, Commercial Concessions: Race, Nation, and Popular Culture in Cuban New York City and Miami, 1940-1960 by Christina D. Abreu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (American Culture) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Jesse Hoffnung-Garskof Associate Professor Richard Turits Associate Professor Yeidy Rivero Associate Professor Anthony P. Mora © Christina D. Abreu 2012 For my parents. ii Acknowledgments Not a single word of this dissertation would have made it to paper without the support of an incredible community of teachers, mentors, colleagues, and friends at the University of Michigan. I am forever grateful to my dissertation committee: Jesse Hoffnung-Garskof, Richard Turits, Yeidy Rivero, and Anthony Mora. Jesse, your careful and critical reading of my chapters challenged me to think more critically and to write with more precision and clarity. From very early on, you treated me as a peer and have always helped put things – from preliminary exams and research plans to the ups and downs of the job market – in perspective. Your advice and example has made me a better writer and a better historian, and for that I thank you. Richard, your confidence in my work has been a constant source of encouragement. Thank you for helping me to realize that I had something important to say. Yeidy, your willingness to join my dissertation committee before you even arrived on campus says a great deal about your intellectual generosity. ¡Mil Gracias! Anthony, watching you in the classroom and interact with students offered me an opportunity to see a great teacher in action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tampa Bay Area During the Sixteenth Century
    Tampa Bay History Volume 25 Issue 1 Article 3 1-1-2011 A Caribbean Borderland: The Tampa Bay Area during the Sixteenth Century Gregory Jason Bell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tampabayhistory Recommended Citation Bell, Gregory Jason (2011) "A Caribbean Borderland: The Tampa Bay Area during the Sixteenth Century," Tampa Bay History: Vol. 25 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tampabayhistory/vol25/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tampa Bay History by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bell: A Caribbean Borderland: The Tampa Bay Area during the Sixteenth C A Caribbean Borderland 1 A Caribbean Borderland: The Tampa Bay Area during the Sixteenth Century By Gregory Jason Bell Have you not hard of floryda, A coontre far bewest. Where savage pepell planted are By nature and by hest. Author unknown, early seventeenth century1 Prior to the first documented arrival of Spaniards on the shores of Tampa Bay in 1528, the Safety Harbor Culture of Florida’s Gulf Coast actively and quite naturally participated in a pan-Caribbean trade network. In fact, at the time of first contact, the Tampa Bay area’s connection with the Caribbean, and especially Cuba, was thousands of years old, stretching back at least to the Late Archaic period (3000–500 BC). The arrival of the Spanish and their subsequent repeated efforts to tame the area and its inhabitants, with the stated purposes of procuring transportable wealth and converting the natives to Catholicism, marked the beginning of a slow and often violent end for the Safety Harbor Culture.
    [Show full text]
  • George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1j49n53k No online items Guide to the George E. Tillitson Collection on Railroads M0165 Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1999 ; revised 2019 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the George E. Tillitson M0165 1 Collection on Railroads M0165 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: George E. Tillitson collection on railroads creator: Tillitson, George E. Identifier/Call Number: M0165 Physical Description: 50.5 Linear Feet(9 cartons and 99 manuscript storage boxes) Date (inclusive): 1880-1959 Abstract: Notes on the history of railroads in the United States and Canada. Conditions Governing Access The collection is open for research. Note that material is stored off-site and must be requested at least 36 hours in advance of intended use. Provenance Gift of George E. Tillitson, 1955. Special Notes One very useful feature of the material is further described in the two attached pages. This is the carefully annotated study of a good many of the important large railroads of the United States complete within their own files, these to be found within the official state of incorporation. Here will be included page references to the frequently huge number of small short-line roads that usually wound up by being “taken in” to the larger and expending Class II and I roads. Some of these files, such as the New York Central or the Pennsylvania Railroad are very big themselves. Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, and Washington are large because the many lumber railroads have been extensively studied out.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Mound Left 30 Men to Establish a Mission and Spread Christianity
    OBAGA ARTIFACTS TOCOBAGA ARTIFACTS The National Register of Historic Places recognized The village extended to the south, as well as the west, the signicance of this site for several reasons. in an L-shaped pattern. Remains of this village were • This village was likely the Tocobaga capitol. discovered in the early 20th century. The trash mound, • It was occupied solely by the Tocobaga. There known as a kitchen midden, also left many clues about was no earlier occupation of the site. their culture and social structure. • It is the “type site” for the Safety Harbor Culture. • It represents the Safety Harbor Period. • It was the site of early Spanish contacts and When the Spanish arrived, they described the Tocobaga the mission founded by Menendez. people as tall, well-muscled, strong and agile. They were armed with powerful bows, stone-tipped arrows and spears thrown with atlals. The Tocobaga wore little clothing, but had many tattoos signifying their rank or status within the tribe. This village was a center of political and cultural inence and was home to between 400 and 2500 people. The pottery and artifacts found at this site dened the came here in 1528 with 400 men in a Pan lo de Narvaez Safety Harbor Culture. The artifacts shown above can be quest for gold and silver. Many conquistadors, such as viewed at the Safety Harbor Museum. The pottery was Narvaez, had little concern for native peoples’ welfare the rst of its type to be found and revealed a culture and treated them cruelly. Cabeza de Vaca was one of not previously known.
    [Show full text]