Late Period Chronology in the Central Mississippi Valley: a Western Tennessee Perspective

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Late Period Chronology in the Central Mississippi Valley: a Western Tennessee Perspective Institutional Database of Staff Publications Tennessee Division of Archaeology Title: Late Period Chronology in the Central Mississippi Valley: A Western Tennessee Perspective. Year: 1996 Name(s): Robert C. Mainfort, Jr. Source: Southeastern Archaeology 15(2):172–181. Division of Archaeology • 1216 Foster Ave. • Cole Bldg #3 • Nashville, TN 37243 Tel: 615-741-1588 • Fax: 615-741-7329 • www.tennessee.gov/environment/section/arch-archaeology REPORTS Late Period Chronology in the Central of variation, particularly in the chronological dimen- Mississippi Valley: A Western Tennessee sion, of our insufficiently specific cultural units such as Nodena" remains largely true today (e.g., O'Brien Perspective 1994, 1995). For example, there is only a single radio- carbon determination for the entire Nodena phase in Robert C. Mainfort, Jr. northeastern Arkansas (Morse 1989; Morse and Morse 1983), five assays for the Kent phase to the south (House 1993), and virtually no radiometrie dates for Abstract. Explaining temporal variation in the late period all of western Tennessee (see below) or northwest (A.D. 1400-1700) archaeological record of the Central Mississippl. Mississippi Valley is a difficult task. Current interpreta- Although a number of specific ceramic vessel forms tions are hampered by a paucity of radiocarbon determi- and decorative motifs, as well as certain lithic arti- nations. Here I present data, both artifactual and radio- facts, are associated consistently with late period oc- metric, from western Tennessee that provide perhaps the cupations in the Central Mississippi Valley (e.g., best currently available contextual and Chronometrie con- Morse 1989; Morse and Morse 1983; Phillips et al. trol for the period of interest in the Central Mississippi 1951; Phillips 1970; Price and Price 1990; Williams Valley. These data, coupled with information published by 1980), more precise dating of sites /components with- other researchers, permit important refinements in late pe- in the Late Mississippian and Protohistoric periods riod temporal segmentation. remains a largely unaccomplished goal. A somewhat arbitrary date of A.D. 1400 is used often to mark the onset of Late Mississippian in the During late prehistoric and protohistoric times Central Mississippi Valley (e.g., Morse 1989). Sites of (A.D. 1400-1700), the Central Mississippi Valley (Fig- this approximate age are identified generally by the ure 1) supported one of the largest concentrations of presence Parkin Punctated and Barton Incised ceram- humans in North America (Morse and Morse 1983; ics, as well as Nodena (willow-leaf) points, although Phillips 1970), and this has attracted intense archae- in the Kent phase area (see Figure 1), Nodena points ological interest in the area since the nineteenth cen- apparently are associated only with post-A.D. 1500 tury (e.g., Holmes 1886; Thomas 1894). In recent contexts (House 1993). In contrast, middle period years, the late period sites of this region have figured Mississippian sites are distinguished by Madison prominently in attempts to reconstruct the route of and /or Scallorn points and a paucity of decorated ce- the de Soto entrada (e.g., Young and Hoffman 1993). ramics (Morse 1993; Morse and Morse 1983; see also Drastic population decline in the wake of de Soto has House 1993). been hypothesized for substantial portions of the Williams (1980) has called attention to a number of study area (e.g., Hoffman 1993; Morse and Morse specific artifact styles and modes that characterize the 1983), although the timing and causes of depopula- latest (protohistoric) aboriginal occupations in the tion remains unclear (e.g., Burnett and Murray 1993). study area (i.e., A.D. 1500-1700), which he refers to Attention has also been devoted to delineating the as the Armorel phase or horizon. These include gad- settlement patterns within several geographically rooned bottles, "teapots," stirrup-necked bottles, ce- separated groups of sites, particularly the Nodena ramic burial urns, compound vessels, vertical appli- and Parkin phases, which are inferred to represent qué fillets (e.g., Campbell Appliqué) and arcaded chiefdoms with hierarchical settlement systems handles on ceramic vessels, Nodena points, small, (Morse 1989; Morse 1981). The ethnic affiliation of snub-nosed endscrapers, and (rarely) European arti- various late period archaeological sites and phases facts. Although Williams's identification of these hall- has also been debated (e.g., Hoffman 1990 and Morse marks represents a major advance in establishing rel- 1990). ative chronology, in the absence of radiometrie dates Unfortunately, broad-scale interpretations of the or stratigraphie evidence, temporal relationships late period archaeological record in the Central Mis- within this complex of artifact types and modes re- sissippi Valley are compromised by the lack of a ro- mains unclear (e.g., Morse 1993), and it seems un- bust chronology. Phillips's (1970:934) statement that likely that all of the Armorel markers appeared at the "we haven't even begun to understand the nuances same time. 172 REPORTS ' r %&% JiOno SharPe V / r '*^ ( 0 1 25 ( ' N* t*$ ' (. 0 1miles ' / 4ca ^%' ' / »40LA7 ♦ J? Sweat JONES JONES ,nNPe ,nNPe 0 ' miles km ca '° / / ' J C¿O^L^'^ / /I J SenPHAcp ♦PHASE J? SenJones Jones Bayou Sweat y KnA2>t Bayou JONES JAVO" KnA2>t I r^ PHAcp PHASE ^ Füllen y [S^ Nodena * ^^ >^V^' V^ Carson Lake • * f&/ ^^/v ' Notqrass • _^ l^Graves Lake x'^/o C /J^^Hatchie _^ V%,, Turnbow«5^ N| Richardson's Landing ^N^ 7« Fortune ß • Wilder TIPTON A PARKIN Neeley'SFerry.V/BartonRanch /fast * PHASE U PHASE Williamson*/ r¿ Parkin Vemon S Paul • ,| * , Jeter ^ LoOsahat^i^>^^^ ^Rose Mound W. rj^ Mound Place f^*? ^Ü^Ü^er ) Young # •J^Vchucalissa S^^-^_-> - v «-.-.i^s "^çs-,1 # •J^Vchucalissa sas ^ v Clay Hill V Davis •. ^ • lrby y^V_ V^ • )ts * Beck u£?r Lake Cormorant ^r^ ^^^ KENT Soudan • .V"5 * A-^Commeroe u£?r ,«^ ^^^ ^ ~^ U PHASE Grant #U r Hollywood ^^ X StarkleO^ r^^-^V J ' 's. #West C V I 1 Sparchman y^y' ^' ' C ^Jr^Salom°n 1 PHASE .vx^>^ ' Figure 1. Late period sites and phases in the Central Mississippi Valley. 173 SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGY 15(2) Winter 1996 Artifacts that can be associated confidently with of southeast Missouri, much of which lies within the the de Soto entrada are potentially excellent horizon modern Mississippi River meander belt. Major drain- markers, but few Spanish (or French) artifacts have age is provided by the St. Francis River and its trib- been found in the Central Mississippi Valley, preclud- utaries, which roughly parallel the Mississippl. To the ing establishment of a chronology such as that de- east, however, the floodplain is comparatively narrow veloped by Marvin Smith (1987) for the interior and is flanked by an extensive system of loess bluffs, Southeast. This situation is partially reflected in the which provided the setting for several large Missis- somewhat crude chronological scheme used by Ra- sippian towns, although the floodplain was also uti- menofsky (1987) for her Lower Mississippi Valley lized. analysis unit. It goes without saying that Spanish ar- Today the alluvial soils of the Central Mississippi tifacts are not present at all archaeological sites that Valley are highly valued for their agricultural pro- were occupied at the time of de Soto's wanderings, ductivity and archaeological evidence suggests that and while the presence of a Spanish artifact demon- they were also prized by prehistoric farmers. Climate strates post-A.D. 1541 occupation in the study area, within the study area is characterized by hot sum- the lack of recorded Spanish artifacts does not nec- mers and relatively mild winters, with a growing sea- essarily have chronological implications. son of at least 200 days. Prior to clearing and draining Here I present data from western Tennessee that during the last century, the floodplain was covered provide perhaps the best currently available contex- by vast stands of cypress, ash, hackberry, and gum, tual and Chronometrie control for the period of inter- with oak and hickory predominating in the uplands est in the Central Mississippi Valley (Figures 1 and (Fisk 1944; Shelford 1963). 2). Ceramic and lithic artifacts from late period sites in this area are generally quite similar to presumably Sites, Assemblages, and Radiometrie Dates contemporary sites in eastern Arkansas, particularly those assigned to the Nodena phase (Mainfort 1994; Located on the loess bluffs about 10 km south of Morse 1989; Morse and Morse 1983; Williams 1980). downtown Memphis, Tennessee, Chucalissa (a.k.a. Building on the work of the Morses (e.g., Morse and "Fuller" and "Shelby") encompasses a 5-m-tall sub- Morse 1983) and Williams (1980), I use western Ten- structural mound, the remains of a second possible nessee data to develop a refined regional chronology substructural mound /specialized mortuary area, a for the Late Mississippian and Protohistoric periods. well-defined plaza flanked by a ridge of house The discussion that follows relies heavily on artifact mounds, and various residential loci within an area assemblages and radiocarbon determinations from of approximately 6 ha (Figure 2). The site was exca- four sites. Other pertinent sites have not been ig- vated on virtually a yearly basis between 1956 and nored, but as will be seen below, there are few truly 1987, but relatively little has been published on this comparable data sets available in the study area. Im- research (e.g., Nash 1972); a recent monograph by portantly, the key artifact types and vessel forms dis- Lumb and McNutt (1988) and a discussion of the ves- cussed here occur throughout the Central Mississippi sel assemblage by Childress (1992) are welcome con- Valley. tributions. The Tennessee Division of Archaeology The sites illustrated in Figure 2 represent all of the funded a series of radiocarbon determinations that recorded, relatively large Late Mississippian /Proto- provide a much firmer basis for interpreting site chro- historic sites in the Mississippi Delta portion of west- nology than the few dates previously published ern Tennessee.
Recommended publications
  • Climatic Variability in Sixteenth-Century Europe and Its Social Dimension: a Synthesis
    CLIMATIC VARIABILITY IN SIXTEENTH-CENTURY EUROPE AND ITS SOCIAL DIMENSION: A SYNTHESIS CHRISTIAN PFISTER', RUDOLF BRAzDIL2 IInstitute afHistory, University a/Bern, Unitobler, CH-3000 Bern 9, Switzerland 2Department a/Geography, Masaryk University, Kotlar8M 2, CZ-61137 Bmo, Czech Republic Abstract. The introductory paper to this special issue of Climatic Change sununarizes the results of an array of studies dealing with the reconstruction of climatic trends and anomalies in sixteenth­ century Europe and their impact on the natural and the social world. Areas discussed include glacier expansion in the Alps, the frequency of natural hazards (floods in central and southem Europe and stonns on the Dutch North Sea coast), the impact of climate deterioration on grain prices and wine production, and finally, witch-hlllltS. The documentary data used for the reconstruction of seasonal and annual precipitation and temperatures in central Europe (Germany, Switzerland and the Czech Republic) include narrative sources, several types of proxy data and 32 weather diaries. Results were compared with long-tenn composite tree ring series and tested statistically by cross-correlating series of indices based OIl documentary data from the sixteenth century with those of simulated indices based on instrumental series (1901-1960). It was shown that series of indices can be taken as good substitutes for instrumental measurements. A corresponding set of weighted seasonal and annual series of temperature and precipitation indices for central Europe was computed from series of temperature and precipitation indices for Germany, Switzerland and the Czech Republic, the weights being in proportion to the area of each country. The series of central European indices were then used to assess temperature and precipitation anomalies for the 1901-1960 period using trmlsfer functions obtained from instrumental records.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from New Spain, Mid 1500S
    Library of Congress Letters Home: Correspondence from Spanish colonists in Mexico City and Puebla to relatives * in Spain, 1558-1589 Mexico City and Puebla, detail of A. Ysarti, Provincia d[e] S. Diego de Mexico EXCERPTS en la nueba Espana . , ca. 1682 Antonio Mateos, a farmer in Puebla, to his wife in Spain, 1558 Very longed-for lady wife: doing the best thing for you and me. Give my About a year and a half ago I wrote you greetings to my sisters and to your brother and greatly desiring to know about you and the health mine and to my nephews, and also to all of your of yourself and my son Antón Mateos, and also cousins and relatives and neighbors, and greet about my sisters and your brother and mine Antón everyone who asks for me. I haven’t heard from Pérez, but I have never had a letter or reply since my cousins for four years and nine months; they you wrote when I sent you money by Juan de left Mexico City and went I don’t know where, Ocampo. With the desire to prepare for your nor do I know if they are alive or dead. No more, arrival, I went to the valley of Atlixco, where they but may our Lord keep you in his hand for me. grow two crops of wheat a year, one irrigated and the other watered by rainfall; I thought that we could be there the rest of our Library of Congress lives. I was a farmer for a year in company with another farmer there; for the future I had found lands and bought four pair of oxen and everything necessary for our livelihood, since the land is the most luxuriant, and plenteous and abundant in grain, that there is in all New Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Mouths of Mississippian: Determining Biological Affinity Between the Oliver Site (22-Co-503) and the Hollywood Site (22-Tu-500)
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2014 From The Mouths Of Mississippian: Determining Biological Affinity Between The Oliver Site (22-Co-503) And The Hollywood Site (22-Tu-500) Hanna Stewart University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Stewart, Hanna, "From The Mouths Of Mississippian: Determining Biological Affinity Between The Oliver Site (22-Co-503) And The Hollywood Site (22-Tu-500)" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 357. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/357 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM THE MOUTHS OF MISSISSIPPIAN: DETERMINING BIOLOGICAL AFFINITY BETWEEN THE OLIVER SITE (22-Co-503) AND THE HOLLYWOOD SITE (22-Tu-500) A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology The University of Mississippi Hanna Stewart B.A. University of Arizona May 2014 Copyright Hanna Stewart 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT The Mississippian period in the American Southeast was a period of immense interaction between polities as a result of vast trade networks, regional mating networks which included spousal exchange, chiefdom collapse, and endemic warfare. This constant interaction is reflected not only in the cultural materials but also in the genetic composition of the inhabitants of this area. Despite constant interaction, cultural restrictions prevented polities from intermixing and coalescent groups under the same polity formed subgroups grounded in their own identity as a result unique histories (Harle 2010; Milner 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2019 Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site Benjamin Garrett Davis University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Benjamin Garrett, "Households and Changing Use of Space at the Transitional Early Mississippian Austin Site" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1570. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1570 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOUSEHOLDS AND CHANGING USE OF SPACE AT THE TRANSITIONAL EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN AUSTIN SITE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology University of Mississippi by BENJAMIN GARRETT DAVIS May 2019 ABSTRACT The Austin Site (22TU549) is a village site located in Tunica County, Mississippi dating to approximately A.D. 1150-1350, along the transition from the Terminal Late Woodland to the Mississippian period. While Elizabeth Hunt’s (2017) masters thesis concluded that the ceramics at Austin emphasized a Late Woodland persistence, the architecture and use of space at the site had yet to be analyzed. This study examines this architecture and use of space over time at Austin to determine if they display evidence of increasing institutionalized inequality. This included creating a map of Austin based on John Connaway’s original excavation notes, and then analyzing this map within the temporal context of the upper Yazoo Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank, Hillsborough County, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE WIGGINS PRAIRIE MITIGATION BANK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: Southern States Land & Timber, LLC 2205 W. Pinhook Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 Prepared by: Florida’s First Choice in Cultural Resource Management Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 (941) 379-6206 Toll Free: 1-800-735-9906 November 2016 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE WIGGINS PRAIRIE MITIGATION BANK, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA For: Southern States Land & Timber, LLC 2205 W. Pinhook Road, Suite 200 Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Marion Almy – Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath – Project Archaeologist Katherine Baar – Archaeologist November 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) performed a cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) of 79 acres of the Wiggins Prairie Mitigation Bank for Southern States Land & Timber, LLC in October 2016. Portions of the 492-acre parcel had been previously surveyed, and the current investigations focused on those areas where subsurface disturbance is anticipated. The purpose of the survey was to locate and identify any archaeological sites and historic resources within the project area of potential effects (APE) and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The archaeological APE consists of those lands that will be subject to subsurface disturbance and have not previously been surveyed for cultural resources. The historical APE consists of the entire property. The survey was requested by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), who reviewed U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) file number SAJ-2016-00429-TMF (Parsons 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • 12,770 ± 320 GX-16. Waterville, Maine Shells 10,820 B.C. 12,210 ± 290 Duplicate of Above 10,260 B.C
    Geochron Laboratories, Inc. Radiocarbon Measurements II Item Type Article; text Authors Krueger, Harold W.; Weeks, C. Francis Citation Krueger, H. W., & Weeks, C. F. (1966). Geochron Laboratories, Inc. radiocarbon measurements II. Radiocarbon, 8, 142-160. DOI 10.1017/S0033822200000096 Publisher American Journal of Science Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © The American Journal of Science Download date 01/10/2021 02:08:25 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/653882 [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 8, 1966, P. 142-160] GEOCHRON LABORATORIES, INC. RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS II HAROLD W. KRUEGER and C. FRANCIS WEEKS Geochron Laboratories, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts INTRODUCTION The following list presents dates on a small fraction of the total number of measurements made during 1964 and 1965 as well as data on some samples previously dated but not published. Results not appearing have not been released by our clients. Procedures of analysis are essentially unchanged from those reported previously (Geochron I). Additional counting equipment identical to that previously described has been installed during the past year. De- tails of the apparatus and procedure for separating collagen from the bone samples may be found in Krueger (in press). SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES A. Eastern United States 12,770 ± 320 GX-16. Waterville, Maine shells 10,820 B.C. 12,210 ± 290 Duplicate of above 10,260 B.C. Shells of Hiatella arctica, from pit on Drummond Ave., Waterville, Maine (44° 34' N Lat, 69° 38' W Long). Found in shelly till. Coll. 1957 and subm. by C. A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Potential Interest to the Media 2020
    Abstracts of potential interest to the media 2020 Climate of the Reformation: droughts and anomalous weather in the 1500s-1510s in Europe https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-10147.html Climatic, environmental and pollution traceability of the monumental Olive and Cedar trees of Lebanon: Lessons from the past to the present https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-20787.html The seismic sound of deep volcanic processes https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-6813.html The Rise And Fall Of An Oyster Bed In The German Bight (North Sea) Before The Dawn Of Industrial Fishery https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-7082.html The Maya Terminal Classic Drought replicated in two stalagmites from Columnas Cave, NW Yucatán https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-18326.html Penguin Life Observatories to monitor the health of the Southern Ocean ecosystems https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-8444.html From Fear to Hope: The inspiring journey of an 11-year-old Environmental Activist https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-18711.html Towards a neural network approach for automated recognition of lichen-covered prehistoric carvings at Stonehenge https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020- 10701.html How Earthquake Early Warning Systems can affect scientist’s liability? International perspective for domestic questions. https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2020/EGU2020-11104.html The 1834 Ermellek earthquake effects and
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY FOR THE SEIR FOR WIDENING U.S. 301 FROM FALKENBURG ROAD TO CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD Hillsborough County, Florida Prepared for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 Prepared by Janus Research 1300 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33607 FINAL REPORT CRAS for the SEIR for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard Hillsborough County November 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) for the State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard in Hillsborough County, Florida was undertaken at the request of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The objective of this survey, which was conducted in November, 2006, was to identify cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area and assess their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) according to the criteria set forth in 36 CFR Section 60.4. This assessment was designed and implemented to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended) as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties, effective January 2001); Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 USC 4321 et seq.), as implemented by the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508); Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 USC 303); Chapter 267, Florida Statutes; and the minimum field methods, data analysis, and reporting standards embodied in the Florida Division of Historical Resources’ (FDHR) Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (February 2003), and Chapter 1A-46 (Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines), Florida Administrative Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W
    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Work Plan for the Proposed Levy Nuclear Plant Project, Levy, Citrus, Marion, Hernando, Sumter, Polk, Hillsborough, and Pinellas Counties, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCES WORK PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED LEVY NUCLEAR PLANT PROJECT, LEVY, CITRUS, MARION, HERNANDO, SUMTER, POLK, HILLSBOROUGH, AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA MASTER CONTRACT # 442498-003 PREPARED FOR PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. BY MICHAEL A. ARBUTHNOT, M.S., ROBERT AUSTIN, PH.D., JOSH TORRES, M.A., AND NICHOLAS J. LINVILLE, M.A. CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMILY M. POWLEN, M.S., MEG GAILLARD, M.A., TRAVIS FULK, M.A., AND CHRIS ALTES, B.A. MICHAEL ARBUTHNOT, M.S., RPA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR ROBERT AUSTIN, PH.D., RPA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INC. WWW.SEARCHINC.COM APRIL 2011 This page intentionally left blank. Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. April 2011 Work Plan for the Proposed LNP Project EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Southeastern Archaeological Research, Inc. (SEARCH) prepared this work plan at the request of Progress Energy Florida (PEF) pursuant to the requirements outlined in two Conditions of Certification (COCs) from the Department of State, Florida Division of Historical Resources (FDHR). PEF will add 180 circuit miles of transmission lines across multiple counties in Florida in order to maintain reliability and move energy efficiently to customers throughout the region and state, where service demands are anticipated to grow by 25% over the next decade. This technical document provides a cultural resources desktop evaluation and work plan for the Levy Nuclear Plant (LNP) Project, which includes seven preferred rights-of-way (ROW) and three accessory parcels totaling 149 miles of preferred ROW and 246 acres, respectively. The project area extends through portions of eight counties: Levy, Citrus, Marion, Hernando, Sumter, Polk, Hillsborough, and Pinellas. This document includes an overview of the natural environment to identify areas best suited to prehistoric land use, and archival and cartographic research to identify areas of historic settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Lesson 4 Technology in the 1500S
    GL5 History Teacher Text Chapter 1 Lesson 4 Technology in the 1500s Student Objectives: • Review the invention, design, and uses of the printing press. • Describe how the printing press works and its importance in history. • Discuss the astrolabe and its use in navigation in the 1500s. • Make, use, and test an astrolabe. Worldview Integration: • God wants us to read, circulate, and explain his Word to others. (Acts 8:26-40; letters of Paul) • God is the maker of the heavens and the Earth. (Genesis 1:1). • God gave us the stars and constellations to help us navigate here on Earth. (Matthew 2:1-12). Materials: • C1L4 “John Gutenberg and the Invention of the Printing Press” from Great Inventors and Their Inventions by Frank P. Bachman, teacher resource • C1L4 Making a Simple Astrolabe • C1L4 An Instrument with a Past and a Future, teacher resource • C1L4 Printing Press Illustrations, teacher resource • Potatoes or soft objects that can be formed into letters • Paper for printing press messages • Ink or paint to dip letters into to “print” their messages Introduction: Two important inventions made possible what we call the Age of Discovery (AD 1400-1799). One was the application of an ancient tool called the astrolabe—a compact instrument used to observe sun, moon, stars, and other celestial bodies. The other was the invention of the printing press by Johannes (John) Gutenberg. He figured out the use of movable type. Because of the printing press and the travel journals of the explorers, people across Europe were able to read about a new world and its potential for trade and wealth to Europeans.
    [Show full text]