Miriam Butt: the Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Miriam Butt: the Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu THE STRUCTURE OF COMPLEX PREDICATES IN URDU a dissertation submitted to the department of linguistics and the committee on graduate studies of stanford university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy By Miriam Jessica Butt December, 1993 c Copyright 1993 by Miriam Jessica Butt All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Peter Sells (Principal Advisor) I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Charles A. Ferguson I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Paul Kiparsky I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Veneeta S. Dayal (Rutgers University) Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies: iii I dedicate this dissertation to my brother, Yassin Mischal Butt. iv Abstract Constructions variously described as complex predicates, compound verbs, composite pred- icates, or serial verbs range across quite an impressive number of differing expressions in differing languages. As such, it is not immediately obvious how to arrive at a consistent formulation of the differences, if there are any, among them, and how to provide a unifying analysis of complex predicates crosslinguistically. The South Asian language Urdu employs a wide variety of complex predicates. I con- duct a detailed examination of two differing Urdu complex predicates: the permissive and the Aspectual complex predicates. The Urdu permissive brings into focus the essential prob- lem complex predicates pose for theories of syntax. The permissive is a complex predicate formed by the combination of two semantic heads in the syntax (not the lexicon). These semantically distinct heads correspond to a single syntactic predicate, which may be dis- continuous. I show that this discontinuity at phrase structure does not affect the status of the permissive as a complex predicate. The problematic aspect for theories of syntax is thus the question of how to represent the fact that a complex predicate may behave both like a syntactically complex structure with respect to certain phenomena, and like a syntactically simple structure with respect to other phenomena. Within Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG), this mismatch in semantic and syntactic information is easily represented in terms of independent levels of representation which are related to one another by a the- ory of linking. However, LFG as originally formulated does not allow for the existence of a semantically complex, but syntactically discontinous single head. Recent work intent on solving this problem in a variety of theoretical frameworks has tended towards an argument structure approach. In particular, Alsina (1993) formulates an argument structure account of Romance causatives within LFG which allows for the argument structure composition of two discontinuous heads in the syntax. I follow Alsina in proposing an analysis of complex predicate formation at argument structure. However, v rather than moving towards a progressively minimalistic and abstract argument structure, which does not explicitly contain thematic role or other semantic information, as proposed in Grimshaw (1990), S. Rosen (1989), Ritter and S. Rosen (1993), and Alsina (1993), I take up the kind of argumentation found in Van Valin (1990), for Role and Reference Grammar (RRG), and propose an elaborated argument structure based on Jackendoff’s (1990) theory of Conceptual Semantics. Urdu Aspectual complex predicates provide evidence for an elab- orated level of argument structure. An Aspectual complex predicate is well-formed only if constraints on semantic properties such as volitionality and inception/completion are met: a main verb negatively specified for one of these domains cannot combine with a light verb positively specified for the same domain. In conclusion, this dissertation presents an in-depth examination of the structure and properties of two differing Urdu complex predicates, the permissive and the Aspectual complex predicates. I formulate a unifying theory of complex predicate formation and in the process address issues concerned with argument structure, linking, and case marking. Finally, I show that the theory of complex predicates I present not only allows a successful account of Romance restructuring verbs and Japanese suru ‘do’, but can also be used as a firm base of comparison for an analysis of serial verb constructions. vi Acknowledgements Having put to paper everything I could about complex predicates within the constraints of time, space, knowledge, and wisdom inherent in a dissertation, I find that I do not want to turn my back on the subject in weary relief. Instead, I still seem to harbor a deep seated belief that a complete understanding of complex predicates is bound to yield the question to the answer of Life, the Universe, and Everything. K.P. Mohanan was my first mentor in linguistics and the first person to introduce me to complex predicates. His delight in exploring alternative, inside-out ways of looking at things left me confused at first, but ultimately taught me very much about linguistic and scientific methodology. My linguistic debt to Mohanan is vast, and I would like to thank him for his time and patience with me. When Mohanan left Stanford for warmer climes, Peter Sells inherited several Mohanan waifs and proceeded to firmly guide us through the process of writing a dissertation. The particular genius of Peter Sells for me consisted of the fact that, no matter how garbled my thoughts were, he could recognize the essence of what I was trying to get at in no time, and sort out my jumbled thoughts into an organized system. In addition to this, Peter Sells was unique in the amount of effort and care that went into the process of advising me: he was always there to respond to desperate cries for help, and always had a good joke to crack as well. Working with Peter Sells was an invaluable part of this dissertation. The dissertation could also not have been written without the input from Joan Bresnan, Charles Ferguson, Paul Kiparsky, Veneeta Srivastav, and Tom Wasow. Joan Bresnan was a member of my committee until my final year, her sabbatical year. A meeting with Joan Bresnan is representative of perhaps the most challenging aspect of my graduate school career. I would leave her office either in complete devastation, resolved not to become a linguist at all, or beaming with exultation because the intense questioning, examination, and discussion of ideas and linguistic issues at large had been so deeply satisfying and engaging. vii Charles Ferguson gave generously of his time, taught me very much about South Asian literature I was not aware of, and deceptively mildly insisted that I do things properly. This dissertation would not be as thorough without his input. Paul Kiparsky and Veneeta Dayal joined the committee as the dissertation was already well under way, but had an immediate and pronounced effect. Paul Kiparsky attacked issues of morphology and lexical semantics I had not considered before. Veneeta Dayal took a close look at my data and claims, pushed me on them steadily, and streamlined my argumentation in the process. Tom Wasow, who served on the Oral Exam committee, generously commented on my work in precise detail. His input allowed a more intelligent presentation of my material. Finally, I would like to thank Yoshiko Matsumoto for serving as the chair of my Oral Exam committee. Alex Alsina, Mary Dalrymple, Henri¨ette de Swart, and Tara Mohanan all read parts of the dissertation and provided me with detailed and insightful comments time and time again. In particular, I could not have done without the many discussions with Mary Dalrymple about the architecture of LFG, and the many exchanges of ideas with Tara Mohanan about the nature of complex predicates and the structure of Hindi or Urdu. In this respect, Alice Davison at the University of Iowa had a most stimulating effect as well. Many sections in this dissertation arose from a need to address the questions and issues she raised. I also owe many thanks to the more general linguistic community at Stanford. Many dis- cussions with Lynn Cherny, Michael Inman, Michio Isoda, Chris Manning, John McWhorter, Yo Matsumoto, and Chris Pi˜n´on kept me on my toes and provided me with interesting material to think about. Veena Dwivedi, although at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, must also be included among this list, as she was the one person I could always most immediately engage in discussions on the structure of Hindi/Urdu. Jennifer Cole, Tracy King, and Gillian Ramchand are the fellow graduate students without whose friendship and support I could not have done. From the time Tracy King and I organized our first conference together in our second year, it was clear that we made a great team. As a team, we went on to organize another conference, and to co-author a paper. In this spirit, we might have co-authored a dissertation, except for the fact that she benightedly insisted on working on Russian. Many aspects of this dissertation have benefitted from Tracy’s input, and some of the discussion on case marking is based on joint work. Gillian Ramchand was the most delightful peer I could have had in graduate school. Whether it was over breakfast, over an A’s game, or during a session of late night TV viii watching, she was always ready to engage in a discussion of linguistic issues, or explain a particular problem I had not been quite able to come to grips with as yet.
Recommended publications
  • 1985 Commencement Program, University Archives, University Of
    UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA Two Hundred Twenty-Ninth Commencement for the Conferring of Degrees PHILADELPHIA CIVIC CENTER CONVENTION HALL Monday, May 20, 1985 Guests will find this diagram helpful in locating the Contents on the opposite page under Degrees in approximate seating of the degree candidates. The Course. Reference to the paragraph on page seven seating roughly corresponds to the order by school describing the colors of the candidates' hoods ac- in which the candidates for degrees are presented, cording to their fields of study may further assist beginning at top left with the College of Arts and guests in placing the locations of the various Sciences. The actual sequence is shown in the schools. Contents Page Seating Diagram of the Graduating Students 2 The Commencement Ceremony 4 Commencement Notes 6 Degrees in Course 8 • The College of Arts and Sciences 8 The College of General Studies 16 The School of Engineering and Applied Science 17 The Wharton School 25 The Wharton Evening School 29 The Wharton Graduate Division 31 The School of Nursing 35 The School of Medicine 38 v The Law School 39 3 The Graduate School of Fine Arts 41 ,/ The School of Dental Medicine 44 The School of Veterinary Medicine 45 • The Graduate School of Education 46 The School of Social Work 48 The Annenberg School of Communications 49 3The Graduate Faculties 49 Certificates 55 General Honors Program 55 Dental Hygiene 55 Advanced Dental Education 55 Social Work 56 Education 56 Fine Arts 56 Commissions 57 Army 57 Navy 57 Principal Undergraduate Academic Honor Societies 58 Faculty Honors 60 Prizes and Awards 64 Class of 1935 70 Events Following Commencement 71 The Commencement Marshals 72 Academic Honors Insert The Commencement Ceremony MUSIC Valley Forge Military Academy and Junior College Regimental Band DALE G.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Cartography, Volume 2
    15 · Introduction to South Asian Cartography JOSEPH E. SCHWARTZBERG In terms of surviving numbers of maps, and in some ways and execution derive almost solely from European or in map quality as well, the premodern cartographic other modern models. achievements of South Asia pale by comparison with When I use the term "Indian" in this section, I do not those of the neighboring regions of the Islamic world and refer only to the area of the present-day Republic of India East Asia. That this should be so is a matter for wonder, but include the whole of the Indian subcontinent, includ­ given India's major contributions to astronomy, geom­ ing Sri Lanka, other nearby islands, and an indeterminate etry, and other branches of mathematics and the remark­ penumbra of adjacent mountainous terrain within the ably creative exuberance of its culture. Although there cultural orbit of India (fig. 15.2). There are also times are grounds to suppose that Indians produced maps for when I shall refer to an even wider Indic cultural realm various purposes for roughly two millennia before the that would include the more or less Indianized cultures advent of the Portuguese-and possibly over a consid­ of mainland and insular Southeast Asia (modern Myan­ erably longer period-virtually nothing in the way of mar [Burma], Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, and ancient cartography survives. In fact, apart from some much of Indonesia) and the vast region of southwestern incised potsherds of the second or first century B.C. that China inhabited by Tibetans, an area substantially larger bear rough plans of monasteries and a few ancient sculp­ than the present Tibetan Autonomous Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep.Ort Resumes
    REP.ORT RESUMES ED 010 471 48 LANGUAGE AND AREA STUDY PROGRAMSIN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES. BY MOSES, LARRY OUR. OF INTELLIGENCE AND RESEARCH, WASHINGTON, 0.Ce REPORT NUMBER NDEA VI -34 PUB DATE 64 EDRS PRICEMF40.27HC $7.08 177P. DESCRIPTORS *LANGUAGE PROGRAMS, *AREA STUDIES, *HIGHER EDUCATION, GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS, COURSES, *NATIONAL SURVEYS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AFRICA, ASIA, LATIN AMERICA, NEAR EAST, WESTERN EUROPE, SOVIET UNION, EASTERN EUROPE . LANGUAGE AND AREA STUDY PROGRAMS OFFERED IN 1964 BY UNITED STATES INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION ARE LISTEDFOR THE AREAS OF (1) AFRICA, (2) ASIA,(3) LATIN AMERICA, (4) NEAR EAST,(5) SOVIET UNION AND EASTERN EUROPE, AND (6) WESTERN EUROPE. INSTITUTIONS OFFERING BOTH GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS IN LANGUAGE AND AREA STUDIESARE ALPHABETIZED BY AREA CATEGORY, AND PROGRAM INFORMATIONON EACH INSTITUTION IS PRESENTED, INCLUDINGFACULTY, DEGREES OFFERED, REGIONAL FOCUS, LANGUAGE COURSES,AREA COURSES, LIBRARY FACILITIES, AND.UNIQUE PROGRAMFEATURES. (LP) -,...- r-4 U.,$. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,EDUCATION AND WELFARE I.: 3 4/ N- , . Office of Education Th,0 document has been. reproducedexactly as received from the petson or organization originating it. Pointsof View or opinions CD st4ted do not necessarily representofficial Office of EdUcirtion?' ri pdpition or policy. CD c.3 LANGUAGEAND AREA "Ai STUDYPROGRAMS IN AMERICAN VERSITIES EXTERNAL RESEARCHSTAFF DEPARTMENT OF STATE 1964 ti This directory was supported in part by contract withtheU.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCEIVING the GODDESS an Old Woman Drawing a Picture of Durga-Mahishasuramardini on a Village Wall, Gujrat State, India
    CONCEIVING THE GODDESS An old woman drawing a picture of Durga-Mahishasuramardini on a village wall, Gujrat State, India. Photo courtesy Jyoti Bhatt, Vadodara, India. CONCEIVING THE GODDESS TRANSFORMATION AND APPROPRIATION IN INDIC RELIGIONS Edited by Jayant Bhalchandra Bapat and Ian Mabbett Conceiving the Goddess: Transformation and Appropriation in Indic Religions © Copyright 2017 Copyright of this collection in its entirety belongs to the editors, Jayant Bhalchandra Bapat and Ian Mabbett. Copyright of the individual chapters belongs to the respective authors. All rights reserved. Apart from any uses permitted by Australia’s Copyright Act 1968, no part of this book may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the copyright owners. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher. Monash University Publishing Matheson Library and Information Services Building, 40 Exhibition Walk Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia www.publishing.monash.edu Monash University Publishing brings to the world publications which advance the best traditions of humane and enlightened thought. Monash University Publishing titles pass through a rigorous process of independent peer review. www.publishing.monash.edu/books/cg-9781925377309.html Design: Les Thomas. Cover image: The Goddess Sonjai at Wai, Maharashtra State, India. Photograph: Jayant Bhalchandra Bapat. ISBN: 9781925377309 (paperback) ISBN: 9781925377316 (PDF) ISBN: 9781925377606 (ePub) The Monash Asia Series Conceiving the Goddess: Transformation and Appropriation in Indic Religions is published as part of the Monash Asia Series. The Monash Asia Series comprises works that make a significant contribution to our understanding of one or more Asian nations or regions. The individual works that make up this multi-disciplinary series are selected on the basis of their contemporary relevance.
    [Show full text]
  • Studia Orientalia 111 Studia Orientalia Volume 111 Published by the Finnish Oriental Society Studia Orientalia Volume 111 Published by the Finnish Oriental Society
    STUDIA ORIENTALIA 111 Studia Orientalia Volume 111 Published by the Finnish Oriental Society Studia Orientalia Volume 111 Published by the Finnish Oriental Society Helsinki 2011 Studia Orientalia, vol. 111, 2011 Copyright © 2011 by the Finnish Oriental Society Societas Orientalis Fennica c/o Department of World Cultures P.O. Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 B) FI-00014 University of Helsinki FINLAND Editor Lotta Aunio Advisory Editorial Board Axel Fleisch (African Studies) Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila (Arabic and Islamic Studies) Tapani Harviainen (Semitic Studies) Arvi Hurskainen (African Studies) Juha Janhunen (Altaic and East Asian Studies) Hannu Juusola (Semitic Studies) Klaus Karttunen (South Asian Studies) Kaj Öhrnberg (Librarian of the Society) Heikki Palva (Arabic Linguistics) Asko Parpola (South Asian Studies) Simo Parpola (Assyriology) Rein Raud (Japanese Studies) Riikka Tuori (Secretary of the Society) Typesetting Lotta Aunio ISSN 0039-3282 ISBN 978-951-9380-79-7 WS Bookwell Oy Jyväskylä 2011 CONTENTS Ordenanzas jerezanas sobre la guarda de la frontera frente a Ronda y su serranía a comienzos de la guerra de Granada (1482–1484) ......................................................1 JUAN ABELLÁN PÉREZ Categories of Proper Language in Classical Arabic Literature ................................23 LALE BEHZADI Algerische Literatur im achtzehnten Jahrhundert ....................................................39 MAREK M. DZIEKAN Economía de los Centros de Culto del Reino de Granada: Los bienes habices de la mezquita y rábitas del Padúl (Valle de
    [Show full text]
  • Ttousl Points of Interest
    ttOUSL Points of Interest 1. Chicago & North Western Station 2. Union Station 3. Grand Central Station 4. LaSalle Street Station 5. Dearborn Station 6. Illinois Central Station 7. Buckingham Fountain 8. Shedd Aquarium 9. Adler Planetarium 10. Soldier Field 11. Chicago Natural History Museum 12. McCormick Place 13. Orchestra Hall 14. Art Institute of Chicago 15. Chicago Public Library 16. Furniture Mart 17. Meigs Field 18. Marshall Field & Co. 19. Board of Trade Bldg. 20. Carson Pirie Scott & Co. 21. Shubert Theatre 22. Marina City 23. Chicago Civic Center 24. U.S. Court House and Federal Office Bldg. 25. Merchandise Mart * CHICAGO J975 r rMnnual, meeting Socielv tidiedLiterature S^mavanylcacfeny IVo 'm i«- ^c Uv*,'4- <$j/Wr <7^^ ofo^j (Mom-i bjwemHer iffi CONTENTS Hotel Floor Plans 4 General Information 5 Society Information and Officers American Academy of Religion 6 Society of Biblical Literature 8 Program Digest 10 Program 14 Exhibitors and Advertisers 57 Index 83 TOIL 87 Society Memberships 89,96 Scholars Press 91 Center for Scholarly Publishing and Services 96 I nformation/ Registration Inside Back Cover Registration Form Foldout Page Reservation Form for Breakfast Sessions Foldout Page Hotel Reservation Form Foldout Page PALMER HOUSE MEETING FACILITIES GENERAL INFORMATION Registration SBL Seminar Papers The Registration Area for the Annual Meeting will be Except where otherwise indicated, papers discussed but not located in the Upper Exhibition Hall, and will be open most read at SBL Seminars and at some Group sessions and Con¬ hours during the Meeting. Those who have not pre-registered sultations are printed in the books of Seminar Papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Philip Goldman Catherine and William L
    CURRICULUM VITAE Robert Philip Goldman Catherine and William L. Magistretti Distinguished Professor of Sanskrit Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies University of California, Berkeley 94720–2540 TEL: (510) 642–4089; FAX: (510) 642–2409 EMAIL: rpg@ berkeley.edu Education: Columbia College, Oriental Studies. A.B. 1964. University of Pennsylvania, Oriental Studies. Ph.D. 1971. Employment: The University of Rochester: Assistant Professor of Sanskrit 1970–1971. The University of California at Berkeley: Academic: Assistant Professor of Sanskrit and India Studies, 1971–75. Associate Professor of Sanskrit and India Studies, 1975–79. Professor of Sanskrit and India Studies, 1979–. Sarah Kailath Professor of India Studies, 1996–2000. Professor Above Scale, 2007–. Catherine and William L. Magistretti Distinguished Professor in South and Southeast Asian Studies, 2012— Visiting Professorships Guest Lecturer, Centre for Historical Studies Jawaharlal Nehru University, January–May 2010. Visiting Professor, Department of Philosophy, Jadavpur University, December 2016. Visiting Professor, Department of Comparative Literature, Jadavpur University, December 2017. Administrative Appointments: Chair, Department of South and Southeast Asian Studies, 1981–86, 1993– 98. Associate Chair for South Asia: Center for South and Southeast Asia CV: Robert P. Goldman 2 Studies, 1988–89. Acting Chair, Center for South Asia Studies, 1989. Chair, Center for South Asia Studies, 1990–2000. Co-Visiting Director UCOEAP India Program, 1992. Director, South Asia National Resource Center, 1988–2000 Principal Investigator and Project Director: Berkeley Professional Schools Program in India, 1993–1995. Principal Investigator, Berkeley Urdu Language Program in Pakistan, 1993–2000. Chair, UCOEAP India Formal Review Committee, 2001–2002. Director, UCOEAP Study Center in India, 2004–2007.
    [Show full text]
  • "K"Vôcnlalñre AA
    i AA "k"VÔCnlaLÑre~ AA Sixty Years of Sanskrit Studies Vol. 2 ii Published on the occasion of 15th World Sanskrit Conference being jointly organised by the International Association of Sanskrit Studies (IASS) and the Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan (under the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India) iii AA "k"VÔCnlaLÑre~ AA Sixty Years of Sanskrit Studies (1950–2010) Vol. 2: Countries other than India Edited by Radhavallabh Tripathi Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan iv Cataloging in Publication Data — DK [Courtesy: D.K. Agencies (P) Ltd. <[email protected]>] Ṣaṣṭyabdasaṁskṛtam = Sixty years of Sanskrit studies (1950–2010) / edited by Radhavallabh Tripathi. 2 v. cm. Contributed articles. Includes bibliographical references. Contents: v. 1. India — v. 2. Countries other than India. ISBN 13: 9788124606285 (set) 9788124606308 (Vol. 2) 1. Sanskrit language — Study and teaching — India. 2. Sanskrit language — Study and teaching. 3. Sanskrit literature — India — History and criticism. 4. Sanskrit literature — History and criticism. I. Tripathi, Radhavallabh, 1949- II. Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan. DDC 491.20710954 23 ISBN 13: 978-81-246-0628-5 (set) ISBN 13: 978-81-246-0630-8 (vol. 2) First published in 2012 © Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan, New Delhi. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, except brief quotations, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior written permission of the copyright holder, indicated above, and the publishers. Published by: RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN 56-57, Institutional Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi — 110 058 Phones: (011) 2852 4993, 2852 1994, 2852 4995 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.sanskrit.nic.in and D.K.
    [Show full text]
  • William Norman) Brown Papers (UPT 50 B879
    A Guide to the W. Norman (William Norman) Brown Papers 1912-1975 12.0 Cubic feet UPT 50 B879 Prepared by Robert Nichols September 1992 The University Archives and Records Center 3401 Market Street, Suite 210 Philadelphia, PA 19104-3358 215.898.7024 Fax: 215.573.2036 www.archives.upenn.edu Mark Frazier Lloyd, Director W. Norman (William Norman) Brown Papers UPT 50 B879 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROVENANCE...............................................................................................................................1 ARRANGEMENT...........................................................................................................................1 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE................................................................................................................1 SCOPE AND CONTENT...............................................................................................................2 CONTROLLED ACCESS HEADINGS.........................................................................................3 INVENTORY.................................................................................................................................. 5 GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE...........................................................................................5 RESEARCH MATERIALS.................................................................................................... 14 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO CHANHU-DARO, SIND EXPEDITION OF 1935-1936...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    BOOK REVIEW Noriko Mayeda and W. Norman Brown: Taw iTales: Folk Tales from Jammu (North India). American Oriental Series V o l.57,American Oriental Society, New Haven, Connecticut, 1974,609 pages (photo­ lithoprinted) . At the head of the book, Noriko Mayeda states that her teacher Dr, W. Norman Brown, Professor of Sanskrit and Chairman of South Asia Regional Studies, University of Pennsylvania, has not only given her the manuscript of Tawi Tales which he has collected, but also provided her with valuable reference materials and invaluable suggestions. She further acknowledges her indebtedness to Dr. Mark J. Dresden, Professor of Iranian Studies, and to Dr. Ernest Bender, Professor of Indo-Aryan Languages at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pensylvania. In addition, the two Indexes of Indian folktales com­ piled under the guidance of Dr. Stith Thompson as well as the professor’s per­ sonal advice have greatly helped her. She finally mentions the guidance and advice of Indian scholars, such as Dr. V. Raglavan,retired Head of the Department of Sanskrit, University of Madras, and various others, among them learned local experts in the city of Jammu. The second author of the book, Norman Brown, then explains his share in the joint authorship. While in Jammu, in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, as Professor of English, he let students write essays, suggesting that they take folk­ tales, as heard from family members and relatives, as their topics. Some of the tales collected in this way the professor published in the college monthly magazine The Tawi, so named after the river that flows through Jammu City and borders the college campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Albrecht Was Born March 16, 1917, Died at His Home 7Th Line Of
    Herold der Wahrheit obituaries 1941 - 1975 10-1-1947 Albrecht. – Norman Albrecht was born March 16, 1917, died at his home 7th line of Mornington, half a mile west of Millbank, Ontario, August 10, 1947, aged 30 years, 4 months and 24 days. He was married to Mae Ropp, who with two children survives: Audrey, 5, and Ferne, 1. Also surviving are his parents, Mr. and Mrs. John Albrecht, Crosshill, Ontario, three brothers, John, of Millbank, Lloyd and Kenneth of Crosshill, and one sister, Edith – Mrs. Gordon Becker, Kitchener, Ontario. Funeral services were held August 13, by Sam Leis, at the home, and by Sam Erb and Sam Leis at the Mapleview Amish Mennonite church. Because of illness Bishop Samuel Schultz was unable to be present. Burial was made in the adjacent cemetery. 3-15-1961 Albrecht. – Phoebe, daughter of the late Christian G. and Magdalene (Brenneman) Erb, was born March 30, 1899, in Wellesley Township, Ontario, departed from this life January 11, 1961, at the Stratford General Hospital. An attack of the flu at Christmas 1960 had left her in a despondent state until death removed her from time to eternity. Age 61 years, 9 months and 11 days. In her youth she confessed Christ as her Saviour and was baptized upon the confession of her faith. She was a special friend of the needy and was concerned about spreading the Gospel. Several times she expressed a desire to be with the redeemed in glory. On March 19, 1925, she was married to Amos Albrecht, who survives. Also surviving are 2 daughters (Mary – wife of Elmer Gerber, Wellesley, and Catherine at home), 3 grandchildren, one sister (Nancy – wife of Menno K.
    [Show full text]
  • "K"Vôcnlalñre AA
    iii AA "k"VÔCnlaLÑre~ AA Sixty Years of Sanskrit Studies (1950–2010) Vol. 2: Countries other than India Edited by Radhavallabh Tripathi Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan Sanskrit Studies in the United States 259 Sanskrit Studies in the United States Sheldon Pollock The past sixty years have witnessed a significant transformation of Sanskrit studies in the United States. The sheer number of people studying and teaching Sanskrit in American universities has grown dramatically. The field has also markedly changed its disciplinary location, and has gradually inched from the periphery toward the center of philology and the humanities generally, if still rather less than many of its practitioners might welcome.1 Around 1950, Sanskrit was taught at a handful of universities, among them Chicago, Columbia, Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Pennsylvania, the U. of California at Berkeley, and Yale, typically in departments of classics or comparative philology, or Oriental (or Near Eastern or similar) studies. Today it is taught at scores, at various levels. Graduate programs in Sanskrit, which number about a dozen, are usually housed in departments of “Asian Studies” variously defined (whether including all of Asia, or some combination of East Asia, Southeast Asia, West Asia and the Middle East, or restricted to South Asia, which is now rare). It is complemented by instruction in a range of modern South Asian languages nowhere taught in America before the 1950s, above all Hindi 1 This essay represents a collaborative effort of several distinguished and generous scholars, whose knowledge and, sometimes, very formulations appear in the following pages. I wish to thank Madhav Deshpande, James Fitzgerald, Robert Goldman, Phyllis Granoff, Stephanie Jamison, Matthew Kapstein, Christopher Minkowski, Patrick Olivelle, Richard Salomon, and Michael Witzel.
    [Show full text]