Zeitenwende | Wendezeiten

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Zeitenwende | Wendezeiten Zeitenwende Wendezeiten Special Edition of the Munich Security Report on German Foreign and Security Policy October 2020 October 2020 Zeitenwende | Wendezeiten Special Edition of the Munich Security Report on German Foreign and Security Policy Tobias Bunde Laura Hartmann Franziska Stärk Randolf Carr Christoph Erber Julia Hammelehle Juliane Kabus With guest contributions by Elbridge Colby, François Heisbourg, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Andrey Kortunov, Shivshankar Menon, David Miliband, Ana Palacio, Kevin Rudd, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Nathalie Tocci, and Huiyao Wang. Table of Contents Foreword 4 Foreword by former Federal President Joachim Gauck 8 Executive Summary 11 1 Introduction: The Munich Consensus 17 2 Security Situation: Zeitenwende 26 3 Dependencies: Wonderful Together, 50 Vulnerable Together 4 Investments: Instrumental Reasoning 74 5 Public Opinion: Folk Wisdom 106 6 Decision-making Processes: Berlin Disharmonic 144 7 Outlook: Wendezeiten 166 Notes 176 Endnotes 177 List of Figures 203 Image Sources 210 List of Abbreviations 211 Team 214 Acknowledgments 215 Imprint 217 ZEITENWENDE | WENDEZEITEN Foreword Dear Reader, In recent years, the Munich Security Conference (MSC) has highlighted a wide variety of security policy issues at its events in all corners of the world – from Madrid to Minsk, from Tel Aviv to New York, from Abuja Wolfgang Ischinger to Stavanger. In doing so, we focused primarily on international challenges. At our events, however, we were increasingly confronted with questions about Germany’s positions – sometimes with fear and unease about whether Berlin was, for example, taking certain threats seriously enough – but almost always with great expectations of our country. At home, on the other hand, people still regularly underestimate how important our country is now considered to be almost everywhere in the world. People pay close attention to what is said or done in Berlin – or what is not. This was one more reason we decided to turn our gaze inwards for a change. The question of how exactly our country can contribute to meeting security policy challenges “earlier, more decisively, and more substantially,” as then Federal President Joachim Gauck and then Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier demanded at the Munich Security Conference in 2014, should occupy us even more intensively in the future. 4 FOREWORD One result is this special edition of the Munich Security Report (MSR) with a focus on German foreign and security policy. Thirty years after German unification and six years after the speeches of what is often called the “Munich consensus,” we provide an overview of the strategic position of German foreign policy. The report speaks of a Zeitenwende, the turn of an era in world politics, that has seen the erosion of almost every fundamental certainty of Ger- man foreign policy. From this arises a tremendous need for adaptation – the coming years must become a turning point if we want to develop the strategies, processes, and instruments to deal with the new dimen- sion of security policy challenges. For although Germany has assumed “more responsibility” in one form or another since 2014, the demand for German leadership has grown much faster than the supply in recent years. The report highlights our country’s dependence on the liberal international order as well as German investments in foreign, develop- ment, and defense policy. Based on a representative survey conducted specifically for this report, it provides an overview of public opinion and discusses the need for reform in the foreign policy decision-making process. 5 ZEITENWENDE | WENDEZEITEN In another way, the report also marks a turning point for the Munich Security Conference itself. We have used the months during which no events could take place due to the coronavirus pandemic to further develop the MSC. This included moving our Munich headquarters to the Amerika-Haus, an internal restructuring, a strengthening of our think- tank activities, as well as a revamp of the MSC’s corporate design. This special edition is the first MSC product to appear in a new guise. In addition to improved readability of our font types and greater clarity of our graphics, we have also slightly adapted our logo to emphasize the MSC’s core idea of dialogue, debate, and interaction even more strongly. We are looking forward to your reactions! As always, we would like to thank our many partners who have contrib- uted to the report in one way or another. This applies, of course, to the staff of the research institutions and authorities who provided us with data and material. Thanks are also due to our numerous high-ranking conversation partners in the Office of the Federal President, the Federal Government, the Bundestag, and the political parties who took the time to participate in extensive background discussions, the substance of which had a defining influence on the content of this report. We would also like to thank all of the international experts whose perspectives enriched the report as well as our sponsors who have enabled the expansion of MSC activities. 6 FOREWORD Finally, I would like to thank the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government for generously funding part of this project. It is my hope that this text helps promote both understanding and support for a German and European foreign policy that can successfully confront the dramatic geopolitical changes and challenges we are facing. Yours, Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger Chairman of the Munich Security Conference 7 ZEITENWENDE | WENDEZEITEN Foreword by former Federal President Joachim Gauck When I opened the 50th Munich Security Conference in 2014 – more than six years ago – with my call for Germany, in the face of major global political challenges, to engage earlier, more decisively, and more substantially in foreign and security policy, it was a matter close to my Joachim Gauck heart. In many respects, our country has since taken on more responsi- bility – in dealing with crises and emergencies, reorienting NATO, or reacting to the coronavirus pandemic within the framework of the European Union. It is also true, however, that our commitment in some key areas still falls short of both the demands of a changed world and the expectations of our partners. So my message today is essentially no different – only more urgent. For while German foreign policy is adapting to the changed situation, the situation is continuing to change. In view of what this report describes as a Zeitenwende, the turn of an era in world politics, our country needs courage and confidence. Foreign policy certainties may be dissolving, but we are not at the mercy of the passage of time. We can, if we want to, make an important contribution to holding Europe together and thus to defending our way of life, our liberal democratic order, and our inter- ests in light of new challenges. Last but not least, it is important for Germany and Europe to make a contribution to the defense of universal values. 8 FOREWORD Much is – quite rightly – expected of our country. Foreign countries sometimes have more confidence in us than we have in ourselves. We can do little on our own, and without a strong German commitment, neither the European Union nor NATO will thrive in the long term. The future of the multilateral organizations most important for Germany depends on us now more than ever before. The survey data in this report shows that foreign and security policy is by no means an issue that does not interest Germans: Almost two thirds of Germans are strongly or very strongly interested in foreign and securi- ty policy. And they see that we are facing major challenges: 75 percent believe that there will be more crises and conflicts in the coming years. Global political questions are certainly “bearable” for citizens, even if there are often no easy answers. It would be counterproductive if we tried to avoid foreign policy debates. It is evident that doing so only con- tinues to raise the price of supposedly calming the public. In view of the changing security situation, we must discuss issues of alliance solidarity, the future of European defense, or even nuclear deterrence if we want to convince the population that Germany can and must make a greater contribution to the defense of the increasingly fragile West. This brings us to issues that, by the way, already played a central role in the early years of the Munich Security Conference and are now again the order of the day. It is therefore a good thing that institutions like the Munich Security Conference have not let up and that they persist in putting foreign and security policy issues on the agenda. I wish the report many readers – and all of us a constructive debate on how Germany can live up to its responsibilities in Europe and the world. 9 ZEITENWENDE | WENDEZEITEN 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Thirty years after achieving reunification, Germany faces enormous challenges. Europe’s security is under threat; Europe’s democracies are on the defensive. Context We find ourselves in the midst of a Zeitenwende, the turn of an era, in which established foreign policy certainties of the Federal Republic are evaporat- ing. This new situation is characterized by the dissolution of an internation- al order built over decades, the rise of China, and a resurgence of power poli- tics violating international norms. In addition, we are confronted with the dramatic consequences of climate change as well as rapid technological upheaval. These trends are exacerbated by a gradual reorientation of the United States, the origins of which go farther back than 2016. Washington’s relative power has declined. Today, the US is less able to act as guarantor of the internation- al order and less willing to take on a disproportionate burden. Under Presi- dent Trump, America no longer sees the maintenance of a rules-based inter- national order and its institutions as a priority.
Recommended publications
  • RTF Template
    19. Wahlperiode Ausschuss für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend Mitteilung Berlin, den 15. März 2019 Die 28. Sitzung des Ausschusses für Familie, Sekretariat Senioren, Frauen und Jugend Telefon: +49 30 227-37112 Fax: +49 30 227-36805 findet statt am Mittwoch, dem 20. März 2019, 11:00 Uhr Sitzungssaal Paul-Löbe-Haus Telefon: +49 30 227-30313 Sitzungssaal: Saal 2.200 Fax: +49 30 227-36313 Tagesordnung Tagesordnungspunkt 1 a) Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung Federführend: Ausschuss für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur zielgenauen Stärkung Mitberatend: von Familien Ausschuss für Recht und Verbraucherschutz und ihren Kindern durch die Neugestaltung des Finanzausschuss Kinderzuschlags Ausschuss für Arbeit und Soziales und die Verbesserung der Leistungen für Bildung Ausschuss für Bildung, Forschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung und Teilhabe Haushaltsausschuss (mb und § 96 GO) (Starke-Familien-Gesetz – StaFamG) Gutachtlich: BT-Drucksache 19/7504 Parlamentarischer Beirat für nachhaltige Entwicklung Hierzu wurde/wird verteilt: 19(13)40 Gutachtliche Stellungnahme Berichterstatter/in: 1919(13)9 Petition Abg. Maik Beermann [CDU/CSU] (13)35 Petition Abg. Stefan Schwartze [SPD] 19(13)36a-36j Stellungnahmen der Sachverständigen Abg. Martin Reichardt [AfD] 19(13)38a Stellungnahme Abg. Grigorios Aggelidis [FDP] Abg. Norbert Müller (Potsdam) [DIE LINKE.] Abg. Annalena Baerbock [BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN] Voten angefordert für den: 20.03.2019 19. Wahlperiode Seite 1 von 5 Ausschuss für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend b) Antrag der Abgeordneten Annalena Baerbock, Katja Federführend: Dörner, Jens Lehmann, weiterer Abgeordneter und Ausschuss für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN Mitberatend: Ausschuss für Arbeit und Soziales Kinderzuschlag automatisch auszahlen – Berichterstatter/in: Verdeckte Armut überwinden Abg.
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/26405 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/26405 19. Wahlperiode 03.02.2021 Vorabfassung - wird durch die lektorierte Version ersetzt. - wird durch die lektorierte Version Vorabfassung Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Gyde Jensen, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Grigorios Aggelidis, Renata Alt, Christine Aschenberg-Dugnus, Jens Beeck, Dr. Jens Brandenburg (Rhein-Neckar), Dr. Marco Buschmann, Carl-Julius Cronenberg, Dr. Marcus Faber, Daniel Föst, Otto Fricke, Thomas Hacker, Reginald Hanke, Peter Heidt, Katrin Helling-Plahr, Markus Herbrand, Torsten Herbst, Katja Hessel, Reinhard Houben, Ulla Ihnen, Olaf in der Beek, Pascal Kober, Carina Konrad, Konstantin Kuhle, Ulrich Lechte, Michael Georg Link, Till Mansmann, Dr. Jürgen Martens, Alexander Müller, Frank Müller-Rosentritt, Hagen Reinhold, Dr. Wieland Schinnenburg, Matthias Seestern-Pauly, Judith Skudelny, Dr. Hermann Otto Solms, Dr. Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Benjamin Strasser, Katja Suding, Linda Teuteberg, Stephan Thomae, Manfred Todtenhausen, Gerald Ullrich, Nicole Westig und der Fraktion der FDP Einreise und Aufenthalt von Hongkong-Chinesen in Deutschland und der EU Immer häufiger verlassen Hongkonger Bürger und Bürgerinnen die Sonderver- waltungszone seit den zunehmenden Einschränkungen und Verletzungen der Bürger- und Freiheitsrechte und dem härteren Vorgehen gegen die Demokratie- bewegung. Diese Situation wurde durch das sogenannte nationale „Sicherheits- gesetz“ für Hongkong und die verstärkte Einflussnahme durch die chinesische Regierung auf Hongkong verschärft (https://www.dw.com/de/raus-aus-hongko ng-auswanderung-als-ausweg/a-53600810; https://www.theguardian.com/worl d/2020/oct/01/in-my-dreams-im-there-the-exodus-from-hong-kong). Demokra- tische Staaten reagierten bislang unterschiedlich auf die eskalierende Situation: Großbritannien bietet beispielsweise einen Sonderweg zur Staatsbürgerschaft für die Hongkonger mit einem britischen Überseepass und ihre Angehörigen (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-04/u-k-grants-hongkonger s-five-passports-a-minute-as-exodus-looms).
    [Show full text]
  • Wichtige Anlaufstellen Info Internet
    Wichtige Informationen - wichtige Anlaufstellen Info Internet Telefon Verbandsgemeinde Adenau www.adenau.de 02691/305-0 Feuerwehr 112 Polizei Adenau Polizeiinspektion Adenau, Im Straußenpesch 8, 53518 Adenau 02691-9250 / Internet 02691-924126 hotline: Soforthilfe RLP 2021 Finanzielle Soforthilfe des Landes RLP für Opfer der Hochwasserkatastrophe Info und Formular 02603/71 1234 02603/71 4321 Antrag bei der 02641/975-960 Soforthilfe Kreis AW Antrag auf Auszahlung von Spendengeldern für Hochwasseropfer Kreisverwaltung oder -961 Fluthilfe-Portal Koordinierung Hilfsgesuche und Hilfsangebote durch das Landesamt für Soziales, Jugend und Fluthilfe.rlp.de des Landes Rheinland- Versorgung Rheinland-Pfalz Hilfe: Suche+Angebote Hilfe finden - Hilfe anbieten www.ahrhelp.com Aufbau-Helfer Registrierung Handwerksbetriebe die beim Aufbau helfen möchten www.baut-mit-auf.de Helfer-Shuttle Helfer-Shuttle für freiwillige Helfer im Ahrtal www.helfer-shuttle.de Hinweisportal Vermisste Hinweise an die Polizei Rheinland-Pfalz zu vermissten Personen rlp.hinweisportal.de Hotline Vermisste 0800-6565651 ADD Trier Übersicht über Hilfsangebote Internet Energieversorung: Gas PRIMAGAS Flüssiggas: Sicherheit u. Wiederherstellung Energieversorgung für Flutopfer [email protected] 02151-7429035 www.primagas.de/hochwasser-hilfe Fahrdienste Dorfgemeinschaft Wershofen - DGH Wershofen, Nordstraße 17 , 53520 Wershofen Erreichbar über: L74 aus Richtung Hümmel, K 9 aus Richtung Ohlenhard, K 13 aus Richtung Marthel / Pitscheid Medizinische Versorgung Arztpraxen im Adenau Liste des ganzen Kreises Hochwassergebiet Dr. Czichowski u. S. Knechtges, Allgemeinmediziner Ahrweiler Medizinische Versorgung Trotz der verheerenden Unwetter-Katastrophe arbeitet das Marienhaus Klinikum im Kreis Aktuelles medizinisches Krankenhäuser Ahrweiler an den Standorten Adenau und Bad Neuenahr daran, die medizinische Versorgung, vor Angebot allem für Notfälle, sicher zu stellen. Medikamente-Versorgung Die Versorgung in der Verbandsgemeinde Adenau kann ab sofort wieder über die hiesigen Hausärzte und Apotheken erfolgen.
    [Show full text]
  • Raphael Bossong, LSE
    Challenge Working Paper July 2007 The politics of subterfuge and EU JHA governance capacity Raphael Bossong, LSE This paper starts out from a puzzle: Why is EU JHA characterized by frustrations and blockades, while it is at the same time one of the most dynamic policy-areas?1 Posed in such general terms, this question is almost impossible to answer: Not only is EU JHA policy2 a highly diverse, but has also seen phases of ambitious agenda-setting contrasted by periods of stagnation.3 Therefore, a convincing answer to the above puzzle would require an extensive historical exposition of this policy area, which is beyond the scope of this paper. Here I only intend to review some general factors that inform EU’s current governance capacity in JHA,4 giving particular emphasis to the problems posed by unanimous decision- making in the Third Pillar.5 This structuralist approach cannot explain any particular instances of EU JHA policy-making on its own,6 but it aims to inform subsequent case studies. The paper proceeds in four steps. In a first part, I will discuss the EU’s structural obstacles to unanimous decision-making from a rationalist perspective. For this purpose I draw heavily on the work of Fritz Scharpf (1997) and Adrianne Héritier (1999) who have introduced many useful insights from comparative politics and policy analysis into EU studies. In the second part, I will survey different strategies for successful policy-making under extensive structural constraints to account for the dynamic development of EU JHA policy in recent years. This overview will be broken down into the classic dimensions of policy, polity and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion: Europe Is Worth It – for a Green Recovery Rooted in Solidarity and A
    German Bundestag Printed paper 19/20564 19th electoral term 30 June 2020 version Preliminary Motion tabled by the Members of the Bundestag Agnieszka Brugger, Anja Hajduk, Dr Franziska Brantner, Sven-Christian Kindler, Dr Frithjof Schmidt, Margarete Bause, Kai Gehring, Uwe Kekeritz, Katja Keul, Dr Tobias Lindner, Omid Nouripour, Cem Özdemir, Claudia Roth, Manuel Sarrazin, Jürgen Trittin, Ottmar von Holtz, Luise Amtsberg, Lisa Badum, Danyal Bayaz, Ekin Deligöz, Katja Dörner, Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann, Steffi Lemke, Claudia Müller, Beate Müller-Gemmeke, Erhard Grundl, Dr Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, Maria Klein-Schmeink, Christian Kühn, Stephan Kühn, Stefan Schmidt, Dr Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, Markus Tressel, Lisa Paus, Tabea Rößner, Corinna Rüffer, Margit Stumpp, Dr Konstantin von Notz, Dr Julia Verlinden, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer, Gerhard Zickenheiner and the Alliance 90/The Greens parliamentary group be to Europe is worth it – for a green recovery rooted in solidarity and a strong 2021- 2027 EU budget the by replaced The Bundestag is requested to adopt the following resolution: I. The German Bundestag notes: A strong European Union (EU) built on solidarity which protects its citizens and our livelihoods is the best investment we can make in our future. Our aim is an EU that also and especially proves its worth during these difficult times of the corona pandemic, that fosters democracy, prosperity, equality and health and that resolutely tackles the challenge of the century that is climate protection. We need an EU that bolsters international cooperation on the world stage and does not abandon the weakest on this earth. proofread This requires an EU capable of taking effective action both internally and externally, it requires greater solidarity on our continent and beyond - because no country can effectively combat the climate crisis on its own, no country can stamp out the pandemic on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 44. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Freitag, 27.Juni 2014 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 4 Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Caren Lay, Eva Bulling-Schröter, Dr. Dietmar Bartsch, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. zu der dritten Beratung des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur grundlegenden Reform des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes und zur Änderung weiterer Bestimmungen des Energiewirtschaftsrechts - Drucksachen 18/1304, 18/1573, 18/1891 und 18/1901 - Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 575 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 56 Ja-Stimmen: 109 Nein-Stimmen: 465 Enthaltungen: 1 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 27.06.2014 Beginn: 10:58 Ende: 11:01 Seite: 1 Seite: 2 Seite: 2 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Stephan Albani X Katrin Albsteiger X Peter Altmaier X Artur Auernhammer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Julia Bartz X Günter Baumann X Maik Beermann X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Sybille Benning X Dr. Andre Berghegger X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Ute Bertram X Peter Beyer X Steffen Bilger X Clemens Binninger X Peter Bleser X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Wolfgang Bosbach X Norbert Brackmann X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Dr. Helge Braun X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Alexandra Dinges-Dierig X Alexander Dobrindt X Michael Donth X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Hansjörg Durz X Jutta Eckenbach X Dr. Bernd Fabritius X Hermann Färber X Uwe Feiler X Dr. Thomas Feist X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E.
    [Show full text]
  • NMR Project Proposal
    www.ssoar.info National minority 'regions' in the enlarged European Union: mobilizing for third level politics? Malloy, Tove H. Arbeitspapier / working paper Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Malloy, T. H. (2005). National minority 'regions' in the enlarged European Union: mobilizing for third level politics? (ECMI Working Paper, 24). Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI). https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-63119 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Civil Society - Civil Society Engagement eNewsletter - June 2006 Civil Society Engagement eNewsletter - June 2006 MAIN STORIES: 1. New World Bank General Counsel Appointed by the President 2. World Bank Publishes Ratings of WB's Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) 3. New Avian Flu Trust Fund Established by the European Commission and the World Bank 4. Bank President and Infrastructure Vice President Discusses Lessons Learned on Infrastructure with Civil Society 5. World Bank President Addresses CARE National Advocacy Conference in Washington, D.C., June 7, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized 6. Paul Wolfowitz Remarks at Africa Growth and Opportunity Act Summit (AGOA) 7. Dr. Anwar Ibrahim Deliveres the Presidential Fellow Lecture 8. Global Environment Facility Appoints New CEO * NEWS FROM THE WORLD BANK'S REGIONAL DEPARTMENTS * NEW PUBLICATIONS FROM THE WORLD BANK * NEW WEBSITES / WEB RESOURCES * UPCOMING AND ONGOING GLOBAL EVENTS/DISCUSSIONS * RECENT GLOBAL EVENTS/DISCUSSIONS 1. New World Bank General Counsel Appointed by the President - WB President appointed Ms. Ana Palacio, a Spanish national, to serve as Senior Vice President and World Bank Group General Counsel. She will also serve as Secretary General of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, one of the five organizations composing the World Bank Group. Her candidacy was unanimously recommended by a search committee which included the German and the German and Indonesian Public Disclosure Authorized representatives of the Bank's Board of Directors and was supported by the reputed executive search firm, Russell Reynolds. Ms. Palacio has worked in the private sector in an export business; for a large law firm before establishing her own; she spent eight years with the European Parliament; she was the first woman to serve as Spain's Foreign Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU's Road to Rome
    30/3/2017 The EU’s Road to Rome by Ana Palacio ­ Project Syndicate WORLD AFFAIRS ANA PALACIO Ana Palacio, a former Spanish foreign minister and former Senior Vice President of the World Bank, is a member of the Spanish Council of State, a visiting lecturer at Georgetown University, and a member of the World Economic Forum's Global Agenda Council on the United States. MAR 20, 2017 The EU’s Road to Rome MADRID – At the end of this month, European Union leaders (except for British Prime Minister Theresa May) will gather in Italy to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Treaty of Rome. Anniversary celebrations are always a good excuse for self‐congratulation, and the rhetoric 渄illing the air in the run‐up to the Rome summit suggests that this one will be no different. But EU leaders should also be using the anniversary as an opportunity to re渄lect deeply on the project they are celebrating. The EU is at a crossroads. The United Kingdom has not even formally launched the withdrawal process, yet Brexit has already demolished one of the European project’s founding assumptions: that, however slowly, integration would always move forward. Now, rising nationalist populism is threatening to unravel six decades of progress. A celebration of European unity may be the ideal moment to confront the dif渄icult truth of disunity, and chart a way forward. But the honesty, self‐awareness, and clear vision needed to use the Rome summit in this way does not come naturally to EU leaders, who excel far more at lofty rhetoric than pragmatic solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Networking Peace' Comprehensive Strategies for Sustainable Conflict Management in a Complex Security Environment – the German Approach
    'Networking Peace' Comprehensive strategies for sustainable conflict management in a complex security environment – the German approach. Jael Aheram, “War & Peace”, creative common license Master Thesis by Frauke Seebass s4837800 Supervisor: Dr. Bert Bomert Radboud University M.A. Human Geography Conflict, Territories and Identities 2016-2017 Contents Page Figures and Tables iii List of Abbreviations iii Acknowledgments vi Executive Summary vi 1) Introduction 1 2) Methodological structure: data collection and research design 2 2.1) Literature Review 4 2.2) Semi-structured guided expert interviews 4 2.3) Focus Study: Mixed methods 6 2.4) Evaluation of the research process 7 3) Literature review: theoretical framework and conceptual outline 8 3.1) The Security-Development Nexus and International Peacekeeping: critical assessment on 'global security' 8 3.2) Of peacekeeping and nation-building: current intervention culture 9 3.3) 'Nation-building': reconstructing 'fragile' states 10 3.4) Civil-military interaction for peace and security 12 3.5) The Comprehensive Approach 15 4) The German discourse 18 4.1) Timeline German Comprehensive Approach 19 4.1.1) Preventing Crises, Managing Conflicts, Supporting Peace: Guidelines of the Federal Government 21 4.2) National actors 25 4.2.1) Foreign Office 29 4.2.2) Interior Ministry 31 4.2.3) Ministry of Defense 34 4.2.4) Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development 37 4.2.5) Non-governmental actors 39 4.3) International Cooperation: NATO, EU, UN & OSCE 41 5) Practicing Comprehension: The Berlin Center for International Peacekeeping 45 Operations 6) Discussion 47 6.1) Focus on prevention: anticipatory politics versus political diffidence 48 6.2) Focus on sustainability: national, international and human security 50 6.3) Focus on ownership: top-down vs.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does GERMANY Think About Europe?
    WHat doEs GERMaNY tHiNk aboUt europE? Edited by Ulrike Guérot and Jacqueline Hénard aboUt ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •a pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over one hundred Members - politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries - which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • a physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome and Sofia. In the future ECFR plans to open offices in Warsaw and Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • a distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee on Economic Cooperation and Development
    The Committee on Economic Cooperation and Development 2 “The central challenge in develop- ment cooperation is and remains for the state, businesses and society to work together to provide impe- tus to people in partner countries to help themselves. We can achieve this if we cooperate globally to bring about a shift away from short-term crisis management and towards a strategy of sustainable development. Local populations need to muster the creative power to make the most of their potential. The members of the Committee put their confidence in committed people who work to create a decent future in their home countries.” Dr Peter Ramsauer, CDU/CSU Chairman of the Committee on Economic Cooperation and Development 3 The German Bundestag’s decisions are prepared by its committees, which are estab- lished at the start of each elec- toral term. Four of them are stipulated by the Basic Law, the German constitution: the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Defence Committee, the Committee on the Affairs of the European Union and the Petitions Committee. The Budget Committee and the Committee for the Rules of Procedure are also required by law. The spheres of respon- sibility of the committees essentially reflect the Federal Government’s distribution of ministerial portfolios. This enables Parliament to scruti- nise the government’s work effectively. The Bundestag committees The German Bundestag sets political priorities of its own by establishing additional committees for specific sub- jects, such as sport, cultural affairs or tourism. In addition, special bodies such as parlia- mentary advisory councils, The committees discuss and committees of inquiry or deliberate on items referred study commissions can also to them by the plenary.
    [Show full text]