11, January-June 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Volume: 11, January-June 2021 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES e-ISSN:2455-5142; p-ISSN: 2455-7730 Cognitive Developments, Geographical Models and Theories Dr Mohammadhossein Ramesht, Azhar Abbas Sabr, Kamal Mohammed Ayyash Isfahan University, Department of Geography, Geomorphology Speciality Paper Received: 17th May, 2021; Paper Accepted: 12th June, 2021; Paper Published: 13th June, 2021 How to cite the article: Dr Mohammadhossein Ramesht, Azhar Abbas Sabr, Kamal Mohammed Ayyash, Cognitive Developments, Geographical Models and Theories, IJDSSH, January-June 2021, Vol 11, 22-44 22 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES Volume: 11, January-June 2021 ABSTRACT Theories and models in geography are an expression of a new conception or understanding of a phenomenon or process that geographers attempt to gain the attention of others by suggesting conceptual metaphors[2]. The theory can be understood simply as understanding something else that the researcher is trying to express in words that can have the closest meaning to his discoveries such as "the butterfly effect expressing an objective truth in the communication system". The theory of atmospheric phenomena must be considered an abstract concept of tangible things and in the realm of perception of the human mind and a question of nature the theories and models are always supported by a knowledge base so that the theory cannot exist and has been found to have no epistemological roots so when classifying geographical theories it appears from It is necessary to design cognitive systems first because the foundation of any theory is supported by the conceptual system of its cognitive system. Epistemology has seen both “scientific” and “spatial” and geography has recently seen the introduction of many theories into the cognitive system. The importance of theories lies more in the schemas that organize the researcher's belief and of course the researcher's belief in facts. They differ objectively scientifically Darwin, for example, derived from biology data for his mental schema and beliefs, called evolution proposed by biologist Bertlinvi, from the same data that Darwin studied, another mental schema and belief, called general systems theory. All these differences are due to the cognitive system that affects the researcher's knowledge or instinct, and in this system the researcher's beliefs and mental plans are formed. Keywords: conceptual metaphor, mental schemas, scientific epistemology, spatial epistemology INTRODUCTION scholars and how they deal with geographical At first it may be necessary to pay issues, many are less convinced of this attention to a few short points in order to be importance and some focus on the aspects of more consistent with the audience in applications, unaware that there is no explaining the principles of theory in practical method or suggestion that manifests geography. These points are: Although without theoretical and epistemological models and theories have a prominent role in support. Another important point neglected shaping the type of visions of researchers and by the geographical community is the lack of 23 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES Volume: 11, January-June 2021 proper understanding and the inability to sciences is not a problem, but designing it translate models and theories of other without a geographical translator will distort sciences into geographical language. Of the identity of geographical knowledge. Any course, it is normal for a theory to be theory or model that wants to enter geography introduced into the sciences (eg physics) and from other sciences must accept some after a while other fields of knowledge (eg changes, it must choose the closest metaphor geography) will enter but geoscientists must that can express this principle in geography as be able to translate its metaphors into the its name, and secondly, for new perceptions geographical sciences. For example, in language. It is therefore mentioned in this oceanographer John Stone [1] (1989) for the article that terms such as modernism, first time, after extensive scientific study, positivism, postmodernism, post- attributed the entry of evolutionary thinking structuralism, etc. may not be seen and may into geography to the efforts of seem odd with what are generally known as geomorphologist William Morris Davis. He theoretical ideas in sociology, architecture, believed that Davis had translated Darwin's and other space sciences. The difference statement into a general model of between these methods is that many of these geomorphology in a deductive manner. words were first coined in other sciences such Davis' understanding and ability not to as sociology and philosophy and here we introduce Darwin's principles directly into have tried to use geographical concepts to geography but first to choose a new name for avoid imitating others and to protect the them within the framework of the theory of identity of geographical knowledge. "geographic distance" and use Darwin's principles in geographical language in the DISCUSSION form of conceptual metaphors such as Every theory and model, regardless of the "childhood", "maturity" and "consideration" knowledge presented, belongs to a specific were translated geographically and in In fact, cognitive apparatus and conceptual system. environmental changes in geomorphology The cognitive system can be compared to a have been presented in an algebraic temporal computer operating system to approximate model as the latest theory in the evolution of the mind. We can say that humans encounter the Earth's crust, so few people can four cognitive systems in the process of understand this adaptation of Darwin. For any cognition. geographer it should be clear that quoting and borrowing an idea or theory from other 24 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES Volume: 11, January-June 2021 These four devices are: decisions based on their cognitive system. It 1- The device of interpretive knowledge should not be overlooked that what comes (nihilism) here should not be considered a history of 2- Scientific knowledge device geography because it merely attempted to 3- Organ of Knowledge (Spatial) show the intellectual developments of the 4- The apparatus of interpretive geographers and of course the primacy and knowledge chronological retardation of these Each of these devices has specific default developments are not considered here. The settings on the basis of which they are scientific knowledge system and its impact on distinguished from each other and it is the production of geographical models and common for the researcher to choose each of theories. these devices by default. The device will look The apparatus of scientific epistemology is at the world around it. Usually each cognitive inherited, and it is a remnant of Cartesian system has a specific composition. In this thought, which begins with some important way, the researcher uses his literature without assumptions, which are the separation talking about his cognitive system, and his between the subject and the object, the affiliation with his chosen knowledge system perception of the world in the world of is determined. For example when a person energy and matter, and the dependence on uses concepts like output, input, feedback, tangible things and testability, which is inertia etc. in ordinary slang then it is clear referred to as the Charter of Scientific that he belongs to the systematic system of Thought. Every knowledge system can create epistemology. Apart from written and destinations conversational literature, each cognitive Different view and later theories on his system has its own way of studying conceptual world. In the system of scientific phenomena and thus in such literary and epistemology, three perspectives or models methodological assumptions models and can be considered, namely “evolutionary”, theories are formed. If we want to be satisfied “stochastic” and “environmental” the fruit of with the history of geography in the modern this system in the field of geography. In these era and ignore what was seen in the field of three perspectives many theories in geographical thinking before this era, we geography have been addressed and have had have witnessed the emergence of many important influences on the world's public models and theories in geography. And space and geography (Fig. 1). models in human behavior and categorized 25 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES Volume: 11, January-June 2021 Figure 1: Three epistemological theories from the perspective of the scientific system in geography Foucault refers to two evolutionary and analyzing the morphological changes of stochastic models as paleontology and living organisms. That is why this group of genealogy in the historical and social researchers in geography emphasizes sciences. The evolutionary perspective of observation. Davis believed that the formal geography is a translation of Darwin's changes of the landscape occur in three intellectual principles of geography and was successive algebraic frames of time in the first introduced to geography by Davis (1850- form of "youth", "maturity" and "old age" and 1934) a Harvard geographer according to thus the first steps were taken to make Stoddart (1966). With Darwin's ideas on geography scientific at the time. This view geomorphology he was able to tackle the was extended to human geography through