DOCSLIB.ORG

The Iconography of the Athenian Hero in Late Archaic Greek Vase-Painting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Iconography of the Athenian Hero in Late Archaic Greek Vase-Painting The Iconography of the Athenian Hero in Late Archaic Greek Vase-Painting Elizabeth Anne Bartlett Tucson, Arizona Bachelor of Art, Scripps College, 2006 Master of Art, University of Arizona, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy McIntire Department of Art University of Virginia May 2015 ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________ –ABSTRACT– This study questions how Athenian vase-painters represented heroic figures during the late sixth and early fifth centuries B.C. – specifically from the death of Peisistratos in 528 B.C. to the return of Theseus' bones to Athens in 475/4 B.C. The study focuses on three specific Attic cult heroes with a strong presence both in the Greek world and on Athenian vases: Herakles, Theseus, and Ajax. Although individual studies have been published regarding various aspects of these three heroes, such as subject matter, cult worship, literary presence, and social history, the current one departs from them by categorizing, comparing, and contrasting the different portrayals of the three chosen heroes. Using Athenian vases as the primary form of evidence, the current study endeavors to uncover how individual iconography can – or cannot – identify the heroic figure. By using an iconographic approach of looking at attributes, dress, gestures, poses, and composition, a more complete picture of the image of the hero may be understood. Evidence of both the cult of, and importance of, the Athenian hero is stressed both in ancient texts and through archaeological evidence, thus supplemental material is taken into consideration. Illustrations of Greek heroes can be found on a variety of vase shapes of various techniques, and the accompanying catalogue includes almost 300 examples. The first chapter introduces the concept of the hero in ancient Athens. The subsequent chapters are organized by the hero examined (e.g., Herakles, Theseus, Ajax) and the final chapter is devoted to combinations and juxtapositions of heroic subjects. Based upon the evidence, there appears to be no correlation between the general iconography of all heroic figures; yet the evidence does support the conclusion for certain similarities between the iconography among individual heroes, or natural pairings and groupings of heroes, whether by means of poses, attributes, or even composition. In addition, the evidence points to a similarity in representation between heroic figures and general depictions of athletes and warriors on vases. As a result of this iconographical conclusion, along with the combined and juxtaposed compositions of heroic subjects on a single vase, one can argue that these three heroes were presented in a manner that alluded to everyday life of the active citizen. For my brother, Daniel, who was the bravest hero that ever lived. – TABLE OF CONTENTS – Acknowledgements……………………………………………………........ i Abbreviations………………………………………………………………. iv List of Figures…………………………………………………………........ vi Chapter I: Introduction: Heroes, Vases, and Iconography……….…….…… 1 Introduction……………………………………………….…....…… 1 A. Finding the Greek Hero……………………………………….... 5 B. Heroes in Athens……………………………………………….. 12 C. Past Study of Heroic Iconography…………………….……....... 14 D. Athenian Heroes on Late Archaic Vases……………..……..….. 18 Chapter II: Herakles: Cult, Myth, and Panhellenic Struggles……………… 25 Introduction…………………………………………….……..……. 25 A. Cult of Herakles in Athens………………………….…..………. 27 B. Mythology of Herakles…………………………….…………... 29 C. Herakles in Greek Art…………………………….…………..... 32 D. Herakles in Late Archaic Vase-Painting…………….………..... 34 Depictions of Religious Acts…………………………..………. 36 a. Sacrifices………………………………………..……….. 41 b. Libations………………………………………..………... 43 c. Reclining……………………………………..………….. 46 d. Musikos Argos……………………………..…………….. 50 Depictions of Struggles…………………………..…………….. 53 Early Struggles…………………………………..…..…………. 53 Struggles after 550 B.C…………………………..………..…… 59 a. Struggle for the Tripod……………………..……………. 63 b. Amazonomachy…………………………..……………… 67 c. Geryon……………………………………..…………….. 68 d. Busiris………………………………………..………….. 70 e. Erymanthian Boar……………………………..…………. 70 f. Triton/Nereus…………………………………..………… 72 g. Antaios……………………………………………..…….. 74 h. Cretan Bull………………………………………..……… 76 i. Nemean Lion…………………………………….……….. 77 General Conclusions……………………………………….………. 80 Chapter III: Theseus: Cult, Myth, and Panathenaic Struggles……..………. 87 Introduction…………………………………………………..…….. 87 A. Cult of Theseus in Athens…………………………………….... 88 B. Mythology of Theseus……………………………………….…. 92 C. Theseus in Greek Art…………………………...………….…… 94 D. Theseus in Latin Archaic Vase-Painting………………….……. 101 Struggles with Beasts…………………………………….…….. 102 a. Minotaur…………………………………………………. 106 b. Marathonian Bull………………………………………… 109 c. Krommyon Sow………………………………………….. 115 Struggles with Men…………………………………….……….. 116 a. Prokrustes………………………………………………… 117 b. Skiron…………………………………………………….. 118 c. Kerkyon…………………………………………………... 119 d. Sinis……………………………………………....………. 120 e. Combined Struggles on Cycle Cups………….…...……… 122 Struggles with Women…………………………….…....………. 125 E. Iconographic Allusions to Herakles……………….…………….. 127 a. Club-Bearer………………………………………………. 127 b. Bull-Tamer……………………………………………….. 128 F. Possible Political Implications…………………………………... 130 General Conclusions……………………………………....………… 133 Chapter IV: Ajax: Cult, Myth, and Epic Struggles…………………………. 137 Introduction…………………………………………………………. 137 A. Cult of Ajax……………………………………………………... 140 B. Mythology of Ajax………………………………...……………. 143 C. Ajax in Early Representations…………………...……………… 145 D. Ajax in Late Archaic Vase-Painting……………...…………….. 146 Ajax with Achilles………………………………...……………. 152 a. Carrying the Body of Achilles………………..………….. 153 b. Ajax and Achilles Playing a Boardgame……..………….. 159 Duels……………………………………………………………. 164 a. Battle for the Body of Potroklos……………………….… 165 b. Hektor……………………………………………….…… 167 Ajax with Odysseus…………………………………….………. 169 a. Embassy to Achilles…………………………….……….. 169 b. Quarrel/Vote for the Armor of Achilles……….………… 170 Alone/Suicide……………………………………….………….. 174 Stealing Ajax………………………………………….……………. 177 General Conclusions……………………………………………….. 179 Chapter V: The Heroic Vase: Juxtaposition………………………………... 181 Introduction……………………………………………………….... 181 Juxtaposed Heroes in Late Archaic Greek Vase-Painting………..... 184 A. Herakles and Herakles………………………………………..… 185 B. Theseus and Theseus…………………………………………… 187 C. Herakles and Theseus…………………………………………... 189 D. Ajax and Heroes………………………………………………… 192 a. Ajax and Ajax……………………………………………. 193 b. Ajax and Achilles……………………………….………... 193 c. Ajax (with Achilles) and Herakles……………………..… 195 d. Ajax (with Achilles) with Other Heroes…………………. 196 E. Other Heroic Juxtaposition…………………………….……….. 197 a. Achilles and Achilles…………………………….…….… 197 General Conclusions……………………………………….……….. 199 Conclusion………………………………………………………….………. 202 Catalogues………………………………………………………….………. 215 Chapter II…………………………………………………….…….. 216 Chapter III…………………………………………………….……. 225 Chapter IV…………………………………………………….……. 232 Chapter V………………………………………………………..…. 242 Figures……………………………………………………………………… 249 Bibliography………………………………………………………………... 316 i –ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS– Many individuals and organizations assisted in the research and development of this doctoral thesis, for which I would like to extend my gratitude. First and foremost, I would like to thank the University of Virginia's McIntire Department of Art and the Program in Classical Art and Archaeology, without whose many resources this study would not have been possible. Foremost among those resources stands the woman to whom I owe much of my current status as a teacher and scholar: my graduate and dissertation advisor, Tyler Jo Smith. Her valuable and constructive suggestions during the planning, researching, development, and editing of this work as well as her willingness to give her time so generously has been very much appreciated, as well as her unwavering guidance. I cannot express enough thanks to the rest of my other committee members, John Dobbins, Paul Barolsky, and Jenni Strauss Clay, for their direction, discussions, edits, continued support, and above all their time. I would like to thank other faculty members of the Art History and Classics Departments for their conversations and encouragement regarding my research, notably Jon Mikalson and Natasha Dakouri-Hild. A great deal of thanks is owed to Lucie Wall Stylianopoulos, the former head of the Fiske Kimball Fine Arts Library at the University of Virginia, and the staff of the McIntire Department of Art. I would like to offer my special thanks to Eleni Hasaki, my Masters Studies advisor, for her continued support and unwavering friendship. In addition, I am indebted to both Richard Seaford and Alan Shapiro for sharing their expertise and insights in the field of iconography with a budding scholar such as myself. The resources at the Beazley Archive (Oxford) were fundamental to my project, and I would like to acknowledge Thomas Mannack and Claudia Wagner for indulging my requests and ii opening the archive for my personal use. Assistance provided by Bob Bridges and the entire staff at the American School of Classical Studies in Athens was particularly helpful in receiving permits necessary to visit museums and sites around Greece pertinent to my research. I would also like to thank the following personages for enabling me to visit their museum collections and storerooms
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ependytes in Classical Athens
    THE EPENDYTES IN CLASSICAL ATHENS (PLATES 51-55) To the memoryof Richard D. Sullivan T HE FEW REFERENCES to the ependytes in Classical Greek literature occur in three fragments of Attic drama preserved by Pollux (VII.45): XLTWV EpELSSXLTCTVLOTKOS' XLTCeJVLOV, LaTLOV. ETEL E KaL 0 E(XEV8VVT7)S- EOTLV EV T7 TCV 7OXX XP7OEL, OOTLS' /3OVXOLTO KaL TOVTC TO ovo4LalTL /07)OE^LV .avIX() OVTL, XA7pTTEOvavro EK TCeV 1o00OK\EOVS1 IXvvTpLCOV (TrGF, F 439): 7rE-atXOVSTE v77oaL XLVOYEVE^LST' E'JTEv8VTas. KaL ?EOT7LS UE 7TOVO')TLV EV T^ HEvOEZL(TrGF, I, F 1 c): 'pyq( VOMLJ'EVE/3PL' EXELTEV 3VT7_VV. aVTLKPVS'86E OKELTO E'VTi- NLKOXacpovs,'HpaKXEL X0PopYW (I, p. 771.5 Kock): 4pEPEVVZV TaXECos, XLTCvJa TOVO E7XEV8VTflV Tf VVVXP/3VVXEL EL LV. The lines are disappointingly undescriptive,indicating only that an ependytes can be of linen and is somehow associatedwith the chiton, and that at an earlier period (?) it had a more general meaning, closer to the root of the word, as "thatwhich is put on over."1 Works frequently cited are abbreviatedas follows: Add = L. Burn and R. Glynn, Beazley Addenda,Oxford 1982 Bieber = M. Bieber, History of the Greekand Roman Theater,2nd ed., Princeton 1981 Burn = L. Burn, The Meidias Painter, Oxford 1987 Laskares = N. Laskares, Mop4aL LEpE'(V (X;r'LapXaLov MV7JEfLV?>>, AE?\T 8, 1923 (1925), pp. 103-116 LSAM = F. Sokolowski,Lois sacre'esde l'Asie Mineure, Paris 1955 LSCG = F. Sokolowski,Lois sacreesdes cite'sgrecques, Paris 1969 LSCG-S = F. Sokolowski,Lois sacre'esdes cite'sgrecques. Supple'ment, Paris 1962 Mantes = A. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Kourimos Parthenos
    KOURIMOS PARTHENOS The fragments of an oinochoe ' illustrated here preserve for us the earliest known representation in any medium of the dress and the masks worn by actors in Attic tragedy.2 The style of the vase suggests a date in the neighborhood of 470: 3 a time, that is, when both Aischylos and Sophokles 4 were active in the theatre. Thus, even though our fragments may not shed much new light on the " dark history of the IInv. No. P 11810. Three fragments, mended from five. Height; a, 0.073 m.; b, 0.046 m.; c, 0.065 m. From a round-bodied oinochoe, Beazley Shape III; fairly thin fabric, excellent glaze; relief contour except for the mask; sketch lines on the boy's body. The use of added color is described below, p. 269. For the lower border, a running spiral, with small loops between the spirals. Inside, dull black to brown glaze wash. The fragments were found just outside the Agora Excava- tions, near the bottom of a modern sewer trench along the south side of the Theseion Square, some 200 m. to the south of the temple, at a depth of about 3 m. below the street level. 2 For the fifth century, certainly, relevant comparative material has been limited to three pieces: the relief from the Peiraeus, now in the National Museum, Athens (N. M. 1500; Svoronos, Athener Nationalmuseum, pl. 82), which shows three actors, two of them carrying masks, approaching a reclining Dionysos; the Pronomos vase in Naples (Furtwangler-Reichhold, pls. 143-145), with its elaborate preparations for a satyr-play; and the pelike in Boston, by the Phiale painter (Att.
    [Show full text]
  • Catullus, Archilochus and the 'Motto'. Two Poems of Catullus Have Long Been Compared with Fragments of Ar- Chilochus
    I TWO CATULLIAN QUESTIONS L Catullus, Archilochus and the 'motto'. Two poems of Catullus have long been compared with fragments of Ar- chilochus. First, Catullus 40 and Archilochus 172 West (fully discussed by Hendrickson "CP" 20, 1925, 155); qwenan te mala mew, miselle Ravide, agit praccípítem in rrcos iambos ? quid dcus rtbi nonbene ad.vocatus ve cordcm parat excímre rimn? an uî penenias ín oravulgi? quidvis? qunlubet esse natus oPns? eris, quando quidcm mcos cttnores cwn longavoluisti amare poena. n&rep Auróppa, noîov Érppóoco tó6e tíg oùg rccr,p{epe epwctg fig cò rpìv ;1pfipqoOa; vOv òè 6l rol.ùq úocoîot gcwérrt fflog. This is known to be the beginning of a poem, since Hephaestion, who quotes l-2, only adduces the beginnings of poems; 2I0 ríg &pa òaíprov (quis d.eus) raì téoo 1oX,oúpevoE may well come from the same context. Moreover, as Hendrickson remarks, Lucian's (Pseudol. 1) paraphrase of the context of 223, which he says was addressed to one of toò6 repureteîg é,oopévoog (cf. praecípítem) rfi 1ol.fr t6v iópporv crúto0 who had re- viled the poet, seems to indicate that it went with 172; ín that case Lucian's 6 rcróòatpov &v0prone=míselle, and aiticq (qtoOvtc rai ùro0é- oeqtoî6 iúpporq will help to explain Catullus' application of iantbi to hen- decasyllables (though it does not need much explanation; cf. 54.6 and fr. 3). If Catullus had Archilochus in mind, he diverged from him in the last two lines, which envisage a situaúon quite different from that between Archilo- chus and Lycambes; the poem of Archilochus seems to have continued at considerable length and included the fable of the fox and the eagle (172- 181).
    [Show full text]
  • (Eponymous) Heroes
    is is a version of an electronic document, part of the series, Dēmos: Clas- sical Athenian Democracy, a publicationpublication ofof e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org]. e electronic version of this article off ers contextual information intended to make the study of Athenian democracy more accessible to a wide audience. Please visit the site at http:// www.stoa.org/projects/demos/home. Athenian Political Art from the fi h and fourth centuries: Images of Tribal (Eponymous) Heroes S e Cleisthenic reforms of /, which fi rmly established democracy at Ath- ens, imposed a new division of Attica into ten tribes, each of which consti- tuted a new political and military unit, but included citizens from each of the three geographical regions of Attica – the city, the coast, and the inland. En- rollment in a tribe (according to heredity) was a manda- tory prerequisite for citizenship. As usual in ancient Athenian aff airs, politics and reli- gion came hand in hand and, a er due consultation with Apollo’s oracle at Delphi, each new tribe was assigned to a particular hero a er whom the tribe was named; the ten Amy C. Smith, “Athenian Political Art from the Fi h and Fourth Centuries : Images of Tribal (Eponymous) Heroes,” in C. Blackwell, ed., Dēmos: Classical Athenian Democracy (A.(A. MahoneyMahoney andand R.R. Scaife,Scaife, edd.,edd., e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org], . © , A.C. Smith. tribal heroes are thus known as the eponymous (or name giving) heroes. T : Aristotle indicates that each hero already received worship by the time of the Cleisthenic reforms, although little evi- dence as to the nature of the worship of each hero is now known (Aristot.
    [Show full text]
  • Attic Black Figure from Samothrace
    ATTIC BLACK FIGURE FROM SAMOTHRACE (PLATES 51-56) 1 RAGMENTS of two large black-figure column-kraters,potted and painted about j1t the middle of the sixth century, have been recovered during recent excavations at Samothrace.' Most of these fragments come from an earth fill used for the terrace east of the Stoa.2 Non-joining fragments found in the area of the Arsinoeion in 1939 and in 1949 belong to one of these vessels.3 A few fragments of each krater show traces of burning, for either the clay is gray throughout or the glaze has cracked because of intense heat. The surface of many fragments is scratched and pitted in places, both inside and outside; the glaze and the accessory colors, especially the white, have sometimes flaked. and the foot of a man to right, then a woman A. Column krater with decoration continuing to right facing a man. Next is a man or youtlh around the vase. in a mantle facing a sphinx similar to one on a 1. 65.1057A, 65.1061, 72.5, 72.6, 72.7. nuptial lebes in Houston by the Painter of P1. 51 Louvre F 6 (P1. 53, a).4 Of our sphinx, its forelegs, its haunches articulated by three hori- P.H. 0.285, Diam. of foot 0.203, Th. at ground zontal lines with accessory red between them, line 0.090 m. and part of its tail are preserved. Between the Twenty-six joining pieces from the lower forelegs and haunches are splashes of black glaze portion of the figure zone and the foot with representing an imitation inscription.
    [Show full text]
  • VI the Voice of the Workshop: Signatures As a Source of Information on Potters, Painters and the Ways They Worked Together
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC) Stissi, V.V. Publication date 2002 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Stissi, V. V. (2002). Pottery to the people. The producttion, distribution and consumption of decorated pottery in the Greek world in the Archaic period (650-480 BC). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 VI The voice of the workshop: signatures as a source of information on potters, painters and the ways they worked together 97 VI. 1 Introduction: much discussion, little progress
    [Show full text]
  • Corpvsvasokvm Antiqvorvm
    VNION ACADEMIQVE INTERNATIONALE CORPVSVASOKVM ANTIQVORVM RUSSIA POCC145I THE STATE HERMITAGE MUSEUM FOCYLAPCTBEHHLII 3PMHTA)K ST. PETERSBURG CAHKT-HETEPBYPF ATTIC RED-FIGURE DRINKING CUPS by ANNA PETRAKOVA <<L'ERMA>> di BRETSCHNEIDER - ROMA RUSSIA - FASCICULE xii THE STATE HERMITAGE MUSEUM - FASCICULE V National Committee Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum Russia Chairpersons Professor MIKHAIL PIOTROVSKY, Director of The State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Arts Dr. IRINA DANILOVA, Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow Committee Members Professor GEORGY VILINBAKHOV, Deputy Director of The State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg ANNA TROFIMOVA, Head of the Department of Greek and Roman Antiquities, The State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg Professor EDuARD FROL0v, Head of the Department of Ancient Greece and Rome, St. Petersburg State University IRINA ANTONOVA, Director of Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow Member of the Russian Academy of Education Professor GEORGY KNABE, Institute of the Humanities, State Humane University of Russia, Moscow Dr. OLGA TUGUSHEVA, Department of the Art and Archaeology of the Ancient World, Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum. Russia. - Roma: <<L'ERMA>> di BRETSCHNEIDER. - V.; 32 cm. In testa al front.: Union Academique Internationale. - Tit. parallelo in russo 12: The State Hermitage Museum, St. Peterbsurg. 5. Attic Red-Figure Drinking Cups / by Anna Petrakova. - Roma: <<L'EFJVIA>> di BRETSCHNEIDER, 2007. - 94 P., 17 c. di tav.: ill.; 32 cm. (Tavole segnate: Russia da 540 a 622) ISBN 88-8265-427-3 CDD 21. 738.3820938 1. San Pietroburgo - Museo dell'Ermitage - Cataloghi 2. Vasi antichi - Russia I.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilykos Kalos
    EPILYKOS KALOS (PLATES 63 and 64) N TWO EARLIERPAPERS, the writerattempted to identifymembers of prominent Athenian families in the late 6th century using a combinationof kalos names and os- traka.1 In the second of these studies, it was observed that members of the same family occurredin the work of a single vase painter,2whether praised as kalos or named as partici- pant in a scene of athletics or revelry.3The converse,i.e. that the same individual may be namedon vases by painterswho, on the basis of stylistic affinities,should belong to the same workshop,seems also to be true.4The presentpaper tries to demonstrateboth these proposi- tions by linking membersof another importantfamily, the Philaidai, to a circle of painters on whose vases they appear. The starting point is Epilykos, who is named as kalos 19 times in the years ca. 515- 505, 14 of them on vases by a single painter, Skythes.5Of the other 5, 2 are cups by the Pedieus Painter, whom Beazley considered might in fact be Skythes late in the latter's career;61 is a cup linked to Skythes by Bloesch,7 through the potter work, and through details of draughtsmanship,by Beazley;8 1 is a cup placed by Beazley near the Carpenter Painter;9and the last is a plastic aryballos with janiform women's heads, which gives its name to Beazley's Epilykos Class.10 The close relationshipof Epilykos and Skythesis especiallystriking in view of Skythes' small oeuvre, so that the 14 vases praising Epilykos accountfor fully half his total output.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Robertson 1502
    MARTIN ROBERTSON Charles Martin Robertson 1911–2004 MARTIN ROBERTSON was born in Pangbourne on 11 September 1911, the first child of Donald Robertson, who had been appointed that year to an Assistant Lectureship in Classics at Trinity College, Cambridge, and Petica (née Coursolles Jones). The family, including his brother Giles who was born in 1913, lived in Huntingdon Road in Cambridge, moving after the First World War to Bateman Street overlooking the Botanic Gardens. Although Donald wanted his sons to follow him at Westminster School, Petica, a strong personality who ran a salon for the literary and artistic personalities of the day, wished them to stay at home, and, after a time at a prep school, they attended The Leys School in Cambridge. Martin (he was always ‘Martin’, never ‘Charles’, to his parents and his children) learned to read early and is reputed to have read from the newspaper, when four years old, to the noted Cambridge mathematician G. H. Hardy. His love of literature was deep and abiding, but he was not a practical boy nor good at physical pursuits. His father loved riding and arranged for Martin to have riding lessons; Martin did not like the instructor and the lessons were not a success. He found his father rather oppressive and felt that he was an inferior reproduction of him. Whether he would have fared better at the piano is unknown, as Petica decided that Giles was the musi- cal one and denied Martin the chance. He never learned to drive but enjoyed cycling (in his late sixties, on retirement from his Oxford chair and moving house to Cambridge, he cycled all the way from the one to the other).
    [Show full text]
  • Figure Painting in the High School; Experiments and Recommendations
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 5-1-1969 Figure painting in the high school; experiments and recommendations E. Leonora Perron Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Perron, E. Leonora, "Figure painting in the high school; experiments and recommendations" (1969). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 690. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.690 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF E. Leonora Perron for the Master of Science in Teaching Art presented May' 28, 1969. Title: Figure Painting in the High School, Experiments and Recommendatlons. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COM.MITTEE: , . B. J. ardner, Chairman My research problem was to experiment with four high school art classeljJ in drawing and painting the figure, to draw conclusions about how th~y relate to working with the figure, and to recommend I" methods that appeared to be most successful in broadening viewpoints, developing skills and increasing interest and involvement in art. This problem was selected because teenage students, in the vast majority of cases,. have great difficulty in drawing or painting figures and, therefore, strenuously avoid it. I discovered that a subjective approach that recognizes personal • feelings, along with one that requires clo,se lookin~, seemed to get .
    [Show full text]
  • This Pdf of Your Paper in Athenian Potters and Painters Volume III Belongs to the Publishers Oxbow Books and It Is Their Copyright
    This pdf of your paper in Athenian Potters and Painters Volume III belongs to the publishers Oxbow Books and it is their copyright. As author you are licenced to make up to 50 offprints from it, but be- yond that you may not publish it on the World Wide Web until three years from publication (August 2017), unless the site is a limited access intranet (password protected). If you have queries about this please contact the editorial department at Oxbow Books (editorial@ oxbowbooks.com). An offprint from Athenian Pot ters and Painters Volume III edited by John H. Oakley Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-663-9 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-664-6 © Oxbow Books 2014 Oxford & Philadelphia www.oxbowbooks.com Published in the United Kingdom in 2014 by OXBOW BOOKS 10 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford OX1 2EW and in the United States by OXBOW BOOKS 908 Darby Road, Havertown, PA 19083 © Oxbow Books and the individual authors 2014 Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-663-9 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78297-664-6 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Control Number: 2010290514 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher in writing. Printed in the United Kingdom by Short Run Press, Exeter For a complete list of Oxbow titles, please contact: UNITED KINGDOM Oxbow Books Telephone (01865) 241249, Fax (01865)
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Figured Pottery from Corinth Plate 64
    RED-FIGUREDPOTTERY FROM CORINTH SACRED SPRING AND ELSEWHERE (PLATES 63-74) THE PRESENT ARTICLE publishes the inventoried pieces of Attic red-figured pottery discovered during the excavations of the Sacred Spring. Four fragments, 49-52, belong to an unidentified fabric which does not appear to be Attic. The article also includes fragments from the Peribolos of Apollo and the Lechaion Road East, and ends with two miscellaneous sherds and an importantstemless cup. This is, in fact, the first of two articles which will cover most of the Attic red figure that has been found at Corinth since 1957.1The second article will deal with the pottery from the recent exca- vations in the central and southwesternarea of the Forum. Some 71 pieces, mainly fragments, are presented here: 52 (1-52) come from the Sacred Spring, 6 (53-58) from the Peribolos of Apollo, 10 (59-68) from excavations below Roman Shop V, east of the Lechaion Road, 3 (69-71) from various findspots. The catalogue is arrangedby shape and, within each shape, by date so far as possible. A. SACRED SPRING (Pls. 63-69) The early excavations in the Sacred Spring were published by B. H. Hill. The area was re-examined from 1968 to 1970 and again in 1972, during which eight architectural phases were distinguished, the earliest beginning in the later 8th century, the latest ending with the destruction of Corinth in 146 B.C.2 All the inventoried Attic red figure from the new excavations is listed in the following catalogue, but other fragments, of less significance, are kept in the relevant Corinth pottery lots.
    [Show full text]