DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B.8 – Siska Indian Band

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix B.8 – Siska Indian Band Appendix B.8 – Siska Indian Band I - Background Information Siska Indian Band (Siska) is part of the Nlaka’pamux Nation (pronounced “Ing-khla-kap-muh”), whose asserted traditional territory encompasses part of south central British Columbia (BC) from the northern United States to north of Kamloops. The Project pipeline right of way (RoW) crosses Nlaka’pamux’s asserted traditional territory. Siska has 11 reserves: Siska Flat No. 3, Siska Flat No. 5A, Siska Flat No. 5B, Siska Flat No. 8, Humhampt No. 6, Humhampt No. 6A, Kupchynalth No. 1, Kupchynalth No. 2, Moosh No. 4, Nahamanak No. 7, and Zaht No. 5. There are 315 registered Siska members, of whom 89 live on a Siska reserve, 14 live on another reserve, and 212 live off reserve. Siska members historically spoke the Nlaka’pamux language; according to 2011 census data 11.5% of members have at least some knowledge of the language. Siska is a party to the Nlaka’pamux Nation protective Writ of Summons, which was filed in the BC Supreme Court on December 10, 2003, asserting Aboriginal title to a territory identified in the Writ. The Writ also includes Lower Nicola Indian Band, Ashcroft Indian Band, Boothroyd Indian Band, Boston Bar First Nation, Coldwater Indian Band, Cook’s Ferry Indian Band, Kanaka Bar Indian Band, Lytton First Nation, Nicomen Indian Band, Nooaitch Indian Band, Oregon Jack Creek Band, Shackan First Nation, Skuppah First Nation, and Spuzzum First Nation. II - Preliminary Strength of Claim Assessment • Siska is a member band of the Nlaka’pamux Nation. Approximately 226 kilometres (km) of the proposed pipeline RoW and four pipeline facilities (i.e. Kamloops Terminal, Stump Station, Kingsvale Station and Hope Station) would be located within Nlaka'pamux’s asserted traditional territory. The RoW is approximately 48 km from the nearest Siska reserve. • The Crown's preliminary assessment of the Nlaka’pamux Nation's claim for Aboriginal rights, over the section of the Project that spans Kamloops to southwest of Hope, involves a range of a weak to strong prima facie claims. The areas assessed to have strong prima facie claims are in the vicinity of the Nicola Valley south towards the Coquihalla Lakes, which most available ethnographers indicate to be within the Nlaka’pamux territory, and there are some indications of Nlaka’pamux hunting, fishing, gathering uses in the Nicola valley area around the time of contact, with connecting trails. The claims diminish in the area north of Stump Lake, as it is unclear whether this falls within Nlaka’pamux territory, and there is indication of an ancestral connection between the Nlaka’pamux community who moved into the north end of Nicola Lake, intermarrying with the Stewix/Okanagan, which could support a moderate prima facie claim. The prima facie claim diminishes to weak in the vicinity of Hope as it is understood that area is outside the area ethnographers attribute to historic Nlaka’pamux use1. 1 Ministry of Justice, Aboriginal Research Division, Nlakapamux:Review of Ethnographic and Historical Sources (Revised November 20, 2013; Teit, James, “The Thompson Indians of British Columbia” in Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural 1 • The Crown's preliminary assessment of the Nlaka’pamux Nation's claim for Aboriginal title over the section of the Project that spans Kamloops to southwest of Hope, involves a range of a weak to strong prima facie claims. The area assessed to have a strong prima facie claim is in the vicinity of Merritt, which is within the area considered by ethnographers to be within Nlaka’pamux territory, and there are indications for several historic villages in proximity in the Nicola Valley that were likely occupied by the Nlaka’pamux at 1846. The areas with weaker claims include those outside the area ethnographers attribute to the Nlaka’pamux (e.g. north of Stump Lake to Kamloops, and in the vicinity of Hope) and there is no/limited indication of historic Nlaka’pamux use at 18462. III - Involvement in the NEB and Crown Consultation Process Given the nature and location of the Project, and the potential impacts of the Project on Siska’s Aboriginal Interests, the Crown is of the view that the legal duty to consult Siska lies at the middle portion of the Haida consultation spectrum. Siska was placed on Schedule B of the Section 11 Order issued by the Environmental Assessment Office (EAO), which affords Siska opportunities to be consulted at a deeper level. Siska was not registered as an intervenor or commenter in the National Energy Board (NEB) process, and did not submit an application for funding to the NEB. Siska was kept informed of the Crown’s consultation activities during the course of the NEB review through various correspondences from the Major Projects Management Office (MPMO). Siska’s engagement in consultation activities with the Crown began with correspondence in the post-NEB hearing phase and interest in meeting to discuss the Project as well as potential impacts on Siska’s Aboriginal Interests. The MPMO offered Siska $6,000 in participant funding for consultations following the close of the NEB hearing record. MPMO offered Siska an additional $7,000 to support their participation in consultations following the release of the NEB Recommendation Report. Siska did not make use of these funding opportunities. EAO provided Siska with $5,000 in capacity funding towards participation in the provincial process on October 27, 2016. The Crown provided a first draft of this Report to Siska for review and comment on August 17, 2016. The Crown did not receive comments from Siska on the draft Report. Siska met with the Crown on August 9, 2016 to discuss the Project. A second draft of this Report was provided to Aboriginal groups for review and comment on November 1, 2016. The Crown has not received comments from Siska. History, Volume II, 1900.; Dawson, George M., “Notes on the Shuswap People of British Columbia” in Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Section II, 1891; Wyatt, David, “Thompson” in Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 12, Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1998. 2 Ibid. 2 IV - Summary of Key Siska Issues and Concerns Raised Based on key issues and concerns raised by other Nlaka’pamux groups through the NEB hearing process, it is possible to infer that the Project may impact Siska’s Aboriginal Interests by affecting their ability to hunt, trap, gather and fish. The Project could potentially impact cultural and spiritual sites, and contaminate rivers and smaller fish bearing streams in the event of an accident or malfunction. Esh-kn-am Cultural Resource Management Services conducted a joint, third-party traditional land and resource use study, the Traditional Knowledge Project for the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project (the Traditional Knowledge Project) for Coldwater Indian Band, Cook’s Ferry Indian Band, Siska Indian Band, and Boston Bar First Nation (participating bands). In November 2016, the Traditional Knowledge Project report was provided to the Crown on the condition that it be used for the Project, and not be used for any other purpose. Concerns raised by participating bands in the Traditional Knowledge Project include: • Potential environmental impacts affecting the integrity of the aquatic system, and impacts on spawning grounds, traditional medicines, and wildlife migration and mating; • Protection of water for future generations including springs, creeks, falls, lakes and all mountain water; • Use of herbicides may impact food sources and Siska’s health; • Potential impacts due to the presence of Project-related workforce, including pollution, increased pressure on wildlife and vegetation, health resources (e.g., hospitals), and safety for women; • Potential impacts on Cultural Survival Areas, which are linked to Siska’s health, safety and overall well-being; • Potential impacts on spiritual areas, and cultural sites and trails that provide training places for their children and help Siska to hold onto their culture; • Increased access by non-Aboriginals in to the traditional territory (including Project-related workers) if the pipeline were to be approved, as this would provide more access to hunters due to increased infrastructure, and would increase pressures on hunting and fishing resources; • Disruption of access to traditional foods and cultural sites; and • Potential impacts of a spill and clarity from the proponent on spill response procedures. In a meeting with the Crown on August 9, 2016, Siska indicated that successful consultation would involve the development of trust and relationships between Aboriginal groups and the Crown and noted their experience with successful engagement with the province and Teck in the mining sector. Siska also indicated that capacity funding is insufficient for them to participate fully in the review. Siska identified the following Project-related issues and concerns in the August 9, 2016 meeting with the Crown: • Historical infringements of the existing Trans Mountain pipeline on Siska’s Aboriginal Interests must be reconciled prior to Siska’s engagement in discussion about the Project. Siska asserted that their community is opposed to the Project until historical grievances are addressed; 3 • Lack of presence of the federal Crown at the discussion table earlier in the NEB review process; • Inadequate staff, resources, and funding to participate in the Crown consultation process; • In Siska’s confidential traditional land and resource use study submitted to the NEB, Siska identified and mapped traditional crossings, hunting areas, spiritual sites such as baby-naming places, the sites of puberty rights ceremonies, and training areas in Siska’s traditional territory that have been negatively impacted by the Trans Mountain pipeline; • A release of oil in the event of a pipeline spill has the potential to have a massive impact on Siska’s Interests; and • Lack of trust between Siska and the proponent and this relationship differs from other proponents that currently operate projects in Siska’s traditional territory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Archaeology of 1858 in the Fraser Canyon
    The Archaeology of 1858 in the Fraser Canyon Brian Pegg* Introduction ritish Columbia was created as a political entity because of the events of 1858, when the entry of large numbers of prospectors during the Fraser River gold rush led to a short but vicious war Bwith the Nlaka’pamux inhabitants of the Fraser Canyon. Due to this large influx of outsiders, most of whom were American, the British Parliament acted to establish the mainland colony of British Columbia on 2 August 1858.1 The cultural landscape of the Fraser Canyon underwent extremely significant changes between 1858 and the end of the nineteenth century. Construction of the Cariboo Wagon Road and the Canadian Pacific Railway, the establishment of non-Indigenous communities at Boston Bar and North Bend, and the creation of the reserve system took place in the Fraser Canyon where, prior to 1858, Nlaka’pamux people held largely undisputed military, economic, legal, and political power. Before 1858, the most significant relationship Nlaka’pamux people had with outsiders was with the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC), which had forts at Kamloops, Langley, Hope, and Yale.2 Figure 1 shows critical locations for the events of 1858 and immediately afterwards. In 1858, most of the miners were American, with many having a military or paramilitary background, and they quickly entered into hostilities with the Nlaka’pamux. The Fraser Canyon War initially conformed to the pattern of many other “Indian Wars” within the expanding United States (including those in California, from whence many of the Fraser Canyon miners hailed), with miners approaching Indigenous inhabitants * The many individuals who have contributed to this work are too numerous to list.
    [Show full text]
  • Language List 2019
    First Nations Languages in British Columbia – Revised June 2019 Family1 Language Name2 Other Names3 Dialects4 #5 Communities Where Spoken6 Anishnaabemowin Saulteau 7 1 Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN 1. Anishinaabemowin Ojibway ~ Ojibwe Saulteau Plains Ojibway Blueberry River First Nations Fort Nelson First Nation 2. Nēhiyawēwin ᓀᐦᐃᔭᐍᐏᐣ Saulteau First Nations ALGONQUIAN Cree Nēhiyawēwin (Plains Cree) 1 West Moberly First Nations Plains Cree Many urban areas, especially Vancouver Cheslatta Carrier Nation Nak’albun-Dzinghubun/ Lheidli-T’enneh First Nation Stuart-Trembleur Lake Lhoosk’uz Dene Nation Lhtako Dene Nation (Tl’azt’en, Yekooche, Nadleh Whut’en First Nation Nak’azdli) Nak’azdli Whut’en ATHABASKAN- ᑕᗸᒡ NaZko First Nation Saik’uz First Nation Carrier 12 EYAK-TLINGIT or 3. Dakelh Fraser-Nechakoh Stellat’en First Nation 8 Taculli ~ Takulie NA-DENE (Cheslatta, Sdelakoh, Nadleh, Takla Lake First Nation Saik’uZ, Lheidli) Tl’azt’en Nation Ts’il KaZ Koh First Nation Ulkatcho First Nation Blackwater (Lhk’acho, Yekooche First Nation Lhoosk’uz, Ndazko, Lhtakoh) Urban areas, especially Prince George and Quesnel 1 Please see the appendix for definitions of family, language and dialect. 2 The “Language Names” are those used on First Peoples' Language Map of British Columbia (http://fp-maps.ca) and were compiled in consultation with First Nations communities. 3 The “Other Names” are names by which the language is known, today or in the past. Some of these names may no longer be in use and may not be considered acceptable by communities but it is useful to include them in order to assist with the location of language resources which may have used these alternate names.
    [Show full text]
  • First Nations Health Authority Environmental Contaminants Program
    First Nations Health Authority Environmental Contaminants Program GUIDELINES FOR PROPOSALS: A Guide for Health Professionals CONTENTS What is the First Nations Health Authority Environmental Contaminants Program? 1 Who can Apply? 2 Helpful Hints on Building Your Project 4 Project Funding 5 Eligible Projects 6 Review and Selection Process 8 Tools and Resources 12 Proposal Format 14 Example Budget 18 Application Checklist 20 Appendices 22 EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS GUIDELINES FOR PROPOSALS 3 o n m e i r n t a v F a m i l y l C n R o E e s m Wisdom p P m o h n u y mot s E io s n n C a i R i l b i HUMAN c e M t i S u BEING s y a l e L i n p l o t t a a l e y l n c t c t d S u p i i a r ritual a R l l el s ationship N a t i o n s E c o n o m i c ABOUT What is the BC First Nations a l Environmental Contaminants Program? t THE PROCESS e n S y o m i l L R a c n m om e n The First Nations Health Authority: Environmental Contaminants Program (ECP) supports First a s i Nations projects that explore the link between human health and environmental contaminants. It is d p d o F is e a intended to help First Nation communities in BC address their environmental health concerns and na c to support capacity development.
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013)
    A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) INTRODUCTORY NOTE A Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia is a provincial listing of First Nation, Métis and Aboriginal organizations, communities and community services. The Guide is dependent upon voluntary inclusion and is not a comprehensive listing of all Aboriginal organizations in B.C., nor is it able to offer links to all the services that an organization may offer or that may be of interest to Aboriginal people. Publication of the Guide is coordinated by the Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch of the Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation (MARR), to support streamlined access to information about Aboriginal programs and services and to support relationship-building with Aboriginal people and their communities. Information in the Guide is based upon data available at the time of publication. The Guide data is also in an Excel format and can be found by searching the DataBC catalogue at: http://www.data.gov.bc.ca. NOTE: While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information, we have been experiencing some technical challenges while updating the current database. Please contact us if you notice an error in your organization’s listing. We would like to thank you in advance for your patience and understanding as we work towards resolving these challenges. If there have been any changes to your organization’s contact information please send the details to: Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation PO Box 9100 Stn Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • Dionisio Point Excavations
    1HE• Publication of the Archaeological Society of Vol. 31 , No. I - 1999 Dionisio Point Excavations ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF &MIDDEN BRITISH COLUMBIA Published four times a year by the Archaeological Society of British Columbia Dedicated to the protection of archaeological resot:Jrces and the spread of archaeological knowledge. Editorial Committee Editor: Heather Myles (274-4294) President Field Editor: Richard Brolly (689-1678) Helmi Braches (462-8942) arcas@istar. ca [email protected] News Editor: Heather Myles Publications Editor: Robbin Chatan (215-1746) Membership [email protected] Sean Nugent (685-9592) Assistant Editors: Erin Strutt [email protected] erins@intergate. be.ca Fred Braches Annual membership includes I year's subscription to [email protected] The Midden and the ASBC newsletter, SocNotes. Production & Subscriptions: Fred Braches ( 462-8942) Membership Fees I SuBSCRIPTION is included with ASBC membership. Individual: $25 Family: $30 . Seniors/Students: $I 8 Non-members: $14.50 per year ($1 7.00 USA and overseas), Send cheque or money order payable to the ASBC to: payable in Canadian funds to the ASBC. Remit to: ASBC Memberships Midden Subscriptions, ASBC P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station P.O. Box 520, Bentall Station Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 Vancouver BC V6C 2N3 SuBMISSIONs: We welcome contributions on subjects germane ASBC on Internet to BC archaeology. Guidelines are available on request. Sub­ http://home.istar.ca/-glenchan/asbc/asbc.shtml missions and exchange publications should be directed to the appropriate editor at the ASBC address. Affiliated Chapters Copyright Nanaimo Contact: Rachael Sydenham Internet: http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/5433 Contents of The Midden are copyrighted by the ASBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council
    Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council - Province of British Columbia Political Accord on Advancing Recognition, Reconciliation, and Implementation of Title and Rights 1. The Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council (NNTC) is a governing entity of the Nlaka’pamux peoples. The NNTC is committed to protecting, asserting and exercising Nlaka’pamux Title and Rights to bring about the self-sufficiency and well-being of the Nlaka’pamux people. The NNTC member communities are Boothroyd, Lytton, Boston Bar, Oregon Jack Creek, Skuppah, and Spuzzum. 2. The Province and the NNTC have entered into a number of agreements regarding the use of Nlaka’pamux territory that have been a foundation for collaborative relations. The agreements include: Interim Forestry Appendix/Agreement (2016) Economic and Community Development Agreement (ECDA) dealing with shared decision-making and revenue sharing in relation to the ongoing operations of the Highland Valley Copper Mine (2013) Land and Resource Shared Decision Making Pilot Agreement (2014, as amended) These agreements, and the relations they foster, have helped the Province and NNTC move through challenging conflicts, and establish a foundation for moving forward together on important decisions and actions. 3. The Land and Resource Shared Decision Making (SDM) Pilot Agreement established a foundational shared decision making model, and a joint Board structure. The SDM Board established a new way of co-operating between the Nlaka’pamux Nation and the Province. The Board structure and collaborative process moves away from individual and isolated assessments of potential impacts of any proposed project on Nlaka’pamux Title and Rights, to a shared and transparent process where there is equal accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Licence Number: XFSC 285 2018 - Amendment 2 Valid From: 27-Jul-2018 Expiry Date: 31-Aug-2018
    Licence Number: XFSC 285 2018 - Amendment 2 Valid From: 27-Jul-2018 Expiry Date: 31-Aug-2018 This licence is issued under the authority of SECTION 4 OF THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNAL FISHING LICENCES REGULATIONS. This licence is not intended to define an Aboriginal right to fish or its scope; however, for the fishing season, it is intended to provide a mechanism, for reasons of proper management and control of the fisheries and conservation and protection of fish, for requiring compliance with the provisions of this licence. This licence is subject to the Fisheries Act and regulations thereunder, and confers the authority to fish under the following conditions: Food, Social, and Ceremonial purposes. Period of Activity: Licence Holder may harvest during the periods further described in the Terms and Conditions and Species Gear and Areas portion of this licence document. Licence Party and Details: Licence Holder: FIN: 123998 NICOLA TRIBAL ASSOCIATION PO BOX 188 STN MAIN MERRITT BC V1K 1B8 Contact Number: 250-378-4235 Fax Number: 250-378-9119 Species, Quantity of Fish, Area(s) and Gear: Species: CHINOOK SALMON (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Allowable Fishing Start: Friday, July 27, 2018 at 18:00 Times: End: Friday, August 31, 2018 at 18:00 Gear: Gillnet, Set, River Rod & Reel (unspecified) Dip Net Licence Area: SAWMILL CREEK TO TEXAS CREEK; THOMPSON RIVER TO BONAPARTE RIVER Maximum Harvest 800 Pieces (dead) Amount: Additional Descriptions: Fishing is permitted in the following areas: 1. In the waters of the Fraser River: (i) From Sawmill Creek to Williams Creek, (ii) From Petch Creek to Texas Creek. 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 7 Students
    ONLY USE UNDERSTANDING OUR LIVES MIDDLE YEARS DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENTFOR 2019–2020 SURVEY OF GRADE 7 STUDENTS BRITISH COLUMBIA You can preview the survey online at INSTRUCTIONALSAMPLE SURVEY www.mdi.ubc.ca. NOT © Copyright of UBC and contributors. Copying, distributing, modifying or translating this work is expressly forbidden by the copyright holders. Contact Human Early Learning Partnership at [email protected] to obtain copyright permissions. Version: Sep 13, 2019 H18-00507 IMPORTANT REMINDERS! 1. Prior to starting the survey, please read the Student Assent on the next page aloud to your students! Students must be given the opportunity to decline and not complete the survey. Students can withdraw anytime by clicking the button at the bottom of every page. 2. Each student has their own login ID and password assigned to them. Students need to know that their answers are confidential, so that they will feel more comfortable answering the questions honestly. It is critical that they know this is not a test, and that there are no right or wrong answers. 3. The “Tell us About Yourself” section at the beginning of the survey can be challenging for some students. Please read this section aloud to make sure everybody understands. You know your students best and if you are concerned about their reading level, we suggest you read all of the survey questions aloud to your students. 4. The MDI takes about one to two classroom periods to complete.ONLY The “Activities” section is a natural place to break. USE Thank you! What’s new on the MDI? 1. We have updated questions 5-7 on First Nations, Métis and Inuit identity, and First Nations languages learned and spoken at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Coldwater Indian Band
    Appendix B.10 – Coldwater Indian Band I - Background Information The Coldwater Indian Band (Coldwater) is part of the Nlaka’pamux (pronounced “Ing-khla-kap-muh”) people, whose asserted traditional territory encompasses part of south central British Columbia (BC) from the northern United States to north of Kamloops. Coldwater holds three reserves situated near Merritt and/or the banks of the Coldwater River: Coldwater Indian Reserve no. 1 (1,838 hectares [ha]), Gwen Lake Indian Reserve no. 3 (17 ha) and Paul’s Basin Indian Reserve no. 2 (646 ha). Coldwater’s registered population is approximately 330 members living on Coldwater’s reserve lands, 54 members living on other reserves and 455 living off reserve for a total registered population of 840. Coldwater is part of what was historically called Cawa'xamux or Tcawa'xamux (“people of the creek"), or the Nicola section of the upper Nlaka’pamux peoples, originating from a number of Cawa'xamux village communities. The Nicola Athapaskan speaking people of this region (called by the Nlaka’pamux: Stuwixamux) lived in this vicinity during the early 19th century. Coldwater is a member of the Nicola Tribal Association which also includes: Siska Indian Band, Nicomen Indian Band, Shackan Indian Band, Nooaitch Indian Band, Cook’s Ferry Indian Band and Upper Nicola Band. Coldwater members historically spoke Nłeʔkepmxcín or the language of the Stuwixamux. The former is the language of the Nlaka’pamux people, which falls into the Interior Salish language group. Coldwater is a party to the Nlaka’pamux Nation’s Writ of Summons, which was filed in the BC Supreme Court on December 10, 2003, asserting Aboriginal title to a territory identified in the writ.
    [Show full text]
  • BC Hydro ILM Amendment Application.Pdf
    July 4, 2012 INTERIOR TO LOWER MAINLAND TRANSMISSION (ILM) PROJECT Spuzzum Alignment EAC Amendment Application Submitted to: BC Hydro Suite 1100, Four Bentall Centre 1055 Dunsmuir Street P.O. Box 49260 Vancouver, B.C. V7X 1V5 Reference Number: 0914220018-500-R-Rev0 Distribution: REPORT 2 Copies - BC Hydro 2 Copies - BC Environmental Assessment Office 2 Copies - Golder Associates Ltd. ILM PROJECT SPUZZUM ALIGNMENTEAC AMENDMENT APPLICATION Executive Summary BC Hydro has undertaken studies and submitted this Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC) Amendment Application to assess the potential incorporation of the Spuzzum Realignment into the Interior to Lower Mainland Transmission (ILM) Project, a new 500 kilovolt (kV) Alternating Current (AC) overhead electric transmission line from Nicola Substation (NIC), near Merritt, to Meridian Substation (MDN) in Coquitlam. An EAC for the ILM Project was received on June 3, 2009 which included an alignment within the Fraser Canyon through Nodes F-F1-G1-H which would mainly be a new alignment outside of existing BC Hydro Right-of-Way (ROW) (Figures 1 and 2). The proposed Spuzzum Realignment would be within an existing BC Hydro ROW parallel to Circuit 5L41. The Spuzzum Realignment was not part of the ILM Project Alignment permitted in 2009; however, it was studied as part of the environmental assessment. Since the EAC was issued in 2009, BC Hydro has reached an agreement with the Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council (NNTC) on the ILM Project which has permitted consideration of the Spuzzum Realignment. The new line would be constructed within an existing ROW corridor through the following Spuzzum First Nation reserve lands: Papsilqua IR 2 and 2A; and Spuzzum IR 1 and 1A.
    [Show full text]
  • Everybody Has a Piece of the Puzzle Citxw Nlaka’Pamux Assembly Elders and Youth Roundtables Findings Report
    Everybody has a Piece of the Puzzle Citxw Nlaka’pamux Assembly Elders and Youth Roundtables Findings Report July 2016 Harold Tarbell / Beverley O'Neil ABOUT THE CITXW NLAKA’PAMUX ASSEMBLY The Citxw Nlaka’pamux Assembly (CNA) was formed for the purpose of managing and administering the Ashcroft Indian Band, Boston Bar First Nation, Coldwater Indian Band, Cook’s Ferry Indian Band, Nicomen Indian Band, Nooaitch Indian Band, Shackan Indian Band and Siska Indian Band (Participating Bands’) commitments in the Participation Agreement and Economic Community Development Agreement as well as overseeing the Nlaka’pamux Trust and Trust distributions. (www.cna-trust.ca) The Consulting Team This project was performed by Harold Tarbell (Mohawk) of Tarbell Facilitation Network (www.tarbell.ca) and Beverley O’Neil (Ktunaxa) of O’Neil Marketing & Consulting (www.designingnations.com). Each consultant has more than 25 years of experience working with First Nations and Indigenous groups with building strategies, research, and economic development. Citxw Nlaka’pamux Assembly Everyone has a Piece of the Puzzle: Elders and Youth Roundtables Findings Report Contents 1 Introduction – How We Got Here .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 CNA Participating Bands Profile – A Snapshot .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Population ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Nations Education Council
    MISSION STATEMENT The First Peoples Education Council is dedicated to success for Indigenous learners in School District No. 74 (Gold Trail). MANDATE The First Peoples Education Council represents Indigenous communities and has authority to provide direction in partnership with School District No. 74 on educational programs and services for Indigenous learners. Gold Trail recognizes and is respectful that it lies on the territory of the Nlaka'pamux, St'át'imc and Secwepemc people. 1 Formation of the First Peoples Education Council In 1999, representatives of Band communities and School District No. 74 (Gold Trail) agreed to the formation of a First Peoples Education Council. The mandate of the council is: 1. to provide informed consent to the Board of Education regarding expenditures of targeted Indigenous education funding; 2. to provide the Indigenous and Métis within the district with a strong, unified voice on educational matters affecting Indigenous learners; and 3. to advocate for educational success for our children. It was agreed that the Council would have three Co-Chairs representing the three nations. Purpose The purpose of the First Peoples Education Council of School District No. 74 (Gold Trail), through the authority vested in it by members of Indigenous communities and the Board of Education is to improve the life choices, opportunities for success and overall achievement of Indigenous learners. 1. Make decisions regarding targeted funding that affect Indigenous students and Indigenous education programs, resources and services to enhance student achievement; 2. Ensure that the rich histories of the Indigenous peoples of School District No. 74 are respected and honoured; 3.
    [Show full text]