ORION Flight Test Dec
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CHARLA Conspiracion Lunar.Pdf
El hombre en la Luna: ¿una gran producción de NASA o Hollywood? Javier Peralta (IAA/CSIC) 1969: El acontecimiento más importante del siglo XX Y este fue el gran momento !! Definición de “CREER” 1. Asumir como verdad lo que no está comprobado o demostrado. 2. Asumir con firmeza las verdades reveladas por Dios. 3. Pensar, juzgar, sospechar de algo o estar convencido. 4. Tener confianza en alguien. Navaja de Occam “Si existen varias explicaciones para un fenómeno, la más sencilla suele ser la más correcta.” SI FUNCIONASE, ¿LO ESTÁN TEORÍA LOCA LAS EMPRESAS LO USANDO? USARÍAN PARA Clarividencia Búsqueda de Petróleo Radiestesia Auras Reducir los Gastos Homeopatía Hospitalarios Reiki Astrología Bolsa y Mercado de Tarot Valores Cristales de Energía Controlar energía Maldiciones Armas Militares Relatividad Dispositivos GPS Electrodinámica Circuitos Semicondutores Cuántica Pero lo de la conspiración Lunar es diferente… hay pruebas !! El programa Apolo es un Fraude porque ... 1º) La calidad de las fotos es demasiado buena para 1969! El programa Apolo es un Fraude porque ... 2º) No aparecen estrellas en ninguna de las fotos. El programa Apolo es un Fraude porque ... 3º) Ángulo de las sombras y luces son inconsistentes. El programa Apolo es un Fraude porque ... 4º) En las fotos aparecen artefactos como la 'C' que aparece en un roca del fondo (¿¿decorado??). El programa Apolo es un Fraude porque ... 5º) Hay fondos idénticos en fotos que, por sus títulos, fueron hechas a varios kms una de la otra. El programa Apolo es un Fraude porque ... 6º) Los Astronautas y algunos objetos están iluminados en las sombras Usaron varios focos de estudio. -
Mr. James Desantis, Astronaut Memorial Foundation
To: Mr. James DeSantis, Astronaut Memorial Foundation NASA Kennedy Space Center November 11, 1996 "Veterans Day" is a good moment to reflect on people who have died in the service of the United States, and in particular, on people who have died in the service of the manned space activities of this country. We are still trying to establish in your mind that Major Robert Lawrence was one such person. Regarding your correspondence with Mr. Roger Blanchard of the AF Personnel Center, I want to make sure you have the "big picture" regarding whether or not he should be formally recognized as a "dead American astronaut" on the "Astronaut Memorial Foundation". A recent exchange of letters between you and the AF indicates to me that, while you are being technically accurate, you both are still missing the point. Whether or not Major Lawrence ever earned (or deserved) "Air Force Astronaut Status" is irrelevant, since that is not what is necessary to gain recognition by the AMF, as you realize. Neither USAF Major Charles Bassett, nor USAF Captain Theodore Freeman, ever earned that status, yet they are both on the memorial BECAUSE THEY WERE KILLED IN TRAINING FOR THE ASTRONAUT PROGRAM. So they were undeniably "real astronauts" even if they did not have formal USAF "astronaut status". Unless it is your position that both Bassett and Freeman are on the memorial erroneously and should be removed (and of course you don't advocate that, nor do I), you must accept that Major Lawrence's case is a precise analog of theirs. -
Us Air Force Governors Chapter Laureate Awards
US AIR FORCE GOVERNORS 1950-54 Harry G. Armstrong 1954-59 Dan C. Ogle 1958-63 Oliver K. Niess 1963-67 Richard L. Bohannon 1967-68 Kenneth E. Pletcher 1968-69 Henry C. Dorris 1969-70 Robert B. W. Smith 1971-73 Ernest J. Clark 1973-76 Dana G. King, Jr. 1976-78 Ernest J. Clark 1978-83 Murphy A. Chesney 1983-86 Gerald W. Parker 1986 Monte B. Miller, Maj. Gen. 1986-89 Alexander M. Sloan, Maj. Gen. 1989-92 Albert B. Briccetti, Col 1992-96 Charles K. Maffet, Col 1996-00 James M. Benge, Col 2000-04 Arnyce R. Pock, Col 2004-08 Kimberly P. May, Lt Col 2008-10 Vincent F. Carr, Col 2010-13 Rechell G. Rodriguez, Col 2013-17 William Hannah, Jr., Col 2017-Present Matthew B. Carroll, Col (ret) CHAPTER LAUREATE AWARDS 1992 Lt Gen Monte Miller 1993 Col Al Briccetti 1994 Lt Gen Alexander Sloan 1995 No Award 1996 BG (Ret) Gerald Parker 1997 Col (Ret) Kenneth Maffet 1998 Col (Ret) George Crawford 1999 Col (Ret) R. Neal Boswell 2000 Lt Gen (Ret) Murphy A. Chesney 2001 Col (Ret) George Meyer 2002 Col (Ret) Takeshi Wajima 2003 Meeting Cancelled 2004 Col (Ret) Jay Higgs 2005 Col (Ret) Jose Gutierrez-Nunez 2006 Col (Ret) Theodore Freeman 2007 No award 2008 Col (Ret) Matthew Dolan 2009 Col (Ret) John (Rick) Downs 2009 Col (Ret) John McManigle 2010 Col Arnyce Pock 2011 Col (Ret) Richard Winn 2012 Col (Ret) James Jacobson 2013 Col (Ret) Thomas Grau 2014 No award 2015 No award 2016 No award 2017 Col (Ret) Jay B. -
Download Survey Written Responses
Family Members What place or memorial have you seen that you like? What did you like about it? 9/11 memorial It was inclusive, and very calming. 9/11 Memorial It was beautiful. Park with a wall with names on it. Angels status. Water fountain. Water fountain area and location. Touchscreen info individual memorials Oklahoma City Memorial memorabilia collections 9-11 memorial Place to reflect and remember; reminder of the lessons we should Several Washington DC memorials learn from hateful acts Love that all the names were 911 New York City Place on a water fall Before the 911 Memorial was erected; I visited the site a month after the event. I liked its raw state; film posters adverts still hanging up from films premiered months prior. The brutal reality of the site in baring its bones. The paper cranes left by the schoolchildren. The Holocaust Museum along with the Anne Frank Haus spoke to me; the stories behind the lives of these beautiful people subjected to nothing but hate for who they loved and who they were. The educational component to the Holocaust Museum in D.C. spoke volumes to me. To follow the journey of a Holocaust victim... For Pulse, I see a blend of all of this. To learn the stories of why so many sought refuge and enjoyment there. Why did so many leave their "families"? Because they could not be who they were. I find it is important that we teach this lesson-it's okay to be who you are-we have your back-we love you-we will dance with you-in any form of structure. -
GRAIL Reveals Secrets of the Lunar Interior
GRAIL Reveals Secrets of the Lunar Interior — Dr. Patrick J. McGovern, Lunar and Planetary Institute A mini-flotilla of spacecraft sent to the Moon in the past few years by several nations has revealed much about the characteristics of the lunar surface via techniques such as imaging, spectroscopy, and laser ranging. While the achievements of these missions have been impressive, only GRAIL has seen deeply enough to reveal inner secrets that the Moon holds. LRecent Lunar Missions Country Name Launch Date Status ESA Small Missions for Advanced September 27, 2003 Ended with lunar surface impact on Research in Technology-1 (SMART-1) September 3, 2006 USA Acceleration, Reconnection, February 27, 2007 Extension of the THEMIS mission; ended Turbulence and Electrodynamics of in 2012 the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) Japan SELENE (Kaguya) September 14, 2007 Ended with lunar surface impact on June 10, 2009 PChina Chang’e-1 October 24, 2007 Taken out of orbit on March 1, 2009 India Chandrayaan-1 October 22, 2008 Two-year mission; ended after 315 days due to malfunction and loss of contact USA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) June 18, 2009 Completed one-year primary mission; now in five-year extended mission USA Lunar Crater Observation and June 18, 2009 Ended with lunar surface impact on Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) October 9, 2009 China Chang’e-2 October 1, 2010 Primary mission lasted for six months; extended mission completed flyby of asteroid 4179 Toutatis in December 2012 USA Gravity Recovery and Interior September 10, 2011 Ended with lunar surface impact on I Laboratory (GRAIL) December 17, 2012 To probe deeper, NASA launched the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission: twin spacecraft (named “Ebb” and “Flow” by elementary school students from Montana) flying in formation over the lunar surface, tracking each other to within a sensitivity of 50 nanometers per second, or one- twenty-thousandth of the velocity that a snail moves [1], according to GRAIL Principal Investigator Maria Zuber of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. -
Floris Heyne Joel Meter Simon Phillipson Delano Steenmeijer
Floris Heyne Joel Meter Simon Phillipson Delano Steenmeijer Edited by Neil Pearson With a special foreword by Apollo 7 astronaut Walt Cunningham “When you get back… you will be a national hero. But your photographs… they will live forever. Your only key to immortality is the quality of your photography.” Richard W. Underwood NASA Chief of Photography for Mercury, Gemini and Apollo 4 Small steps. Giant leaps. The English word ‘photograph’ is made up of the The early exploration of space is one such historical ancient Greek words ‘photos’ and ‘graphos’ which event, unrivaled among humanity’s achievements. literally mean ‘light writing’. At the time of the Apollo Fortunately space travelers were able to bring back program, that meant exposing a chemically-treated beautiful, moving and instantly recognizable images film to patterns of light and it was this process which to depict it. Those images add a new understanding made it possible to seize moments in time and share to what it means to be human, what it means to them with the world. live on a delicate little orb circling the Sun since time immemorial. A single photograph can tell a story to billions of people. It transcends language barriers, physical Not only did Apollo bring us this photographic barriers and requires no prior knowledge of testimony but many major advancements in the subject. This is the beauty of photography: photographic technology date back to the extensive it reaches out to all people and everybody can research and engineering that was part of the hugely intuitively understand its form and content. -
Reagan, Challenger, and the Nation by Kristen
On A Frigid January Day in Central Florida: Reagan, Challenger, and the Nation By Kristen Soltis Anderson Space Shuttle launches are exhilarating to behold. They are grand spectacles, loud and unapologetic. For those up close, observing from the grounds of Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the rumble of the rocket engines is deafening. Hundreds of miles away, the growing trail of white exhaust topped by a small gleaming dot can be seen brightly, climbing silently into the sky. Whether watching with one’s own eyes or through a television broadcast, any launch of humans into space is a majestic and terrifying thing to behold. There is nothing routine, nothing ordinary about space. Yet on a frigid January day in Central Florida in 1986, the launch of the Space Shuttle Challenger was expected to be just that: routine. So “routine”, according to NBC news coverage, that “the Soviet Union reportedly didn't have its usual spy trawler anchored off the coast”.1 Two dozen previous Space Shuttle missions had taken off from American soil and returned home safely; there was little reason for Americans to think this mission would be any different. Though most Americans were not watching the launch live, one very special group of Americans was: schoolchildren. Despite the otherwise ordinary nature of the launch planned for that day, what did make the Challenger’s tenth mission special was the presence of Christa McAuliffe, a social studies teacher from New Hampshire. President Ronald Reagan had hoped that including a teacher in a shuttle mission would be an uplifting and inspirational reminder to the nation about the importance of education - and of our space program. -
ILWS Report 137 Moon
Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Albury February 2020 © 2011, revised 2020. All rights reserved by the authors. The contents of this publication are copyright in all countries subscribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in existence or to be invented, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the authors, except where permitted by law. Preferred citation of this Report Spennemann, Dirk HR & Murphy, Guy (2020). Returning to the Moon. Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize. Institute for Land, Water and Society Report nº 137. Albury, NSW: Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University. iv, 35 pp ISBN 978-1-86-467370-8 Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are solely the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of Charles Sturt University. Contact Associate Professor Dirk HR Spennemann, MA, PhD, MICOMOS, APF Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury NSW 2640, Australia. email: [email protected] Spennemann & Murphy (2020) Returning to the Moon: Heritage Issues Raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Page ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. HUMAN ARTEFACTS ON THE MOON 3 What Have These Missions Left BehinD? 4 Impactor Missions 10 Lander Missions 11 Rover Missions 11 Sample Return Missions 11 Human Missions 11 The Lunar Environment & ImpLications for Artefact Preservation 13 Decay caused by ascent module 15 Decay by solar radiation 15 Human Interference 16 3. -
Stinging Insect Hypersensitivity: a Practice Parameter Update 2011
Practice parameter Stinging insect hypersensitivity: A practice parameter update 2011 Chief Editors: David B. K. Golden, MD, John Moffitt, MD, and Richard A. Nicklas, MD Workgroup Contributors: Theodore Freeman, MD, David F. Graft, MD, Robert E. Reisman, MD, and James M. Tracy, DO Task Force Reviewers: David Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, Linda Cox, MD, David A. Khan, MD, David M. Lang, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher Randolph, MD, Diane E. Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Steven A. Tilles, MD, and Dana Wallace, MD These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on parameter update II.’’ Because this document incorporated the Practice Parameters, representing the American Academy of efforts of many participants, no single individual, including Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American those who served on the Joint Task Force, is authorized to College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. practice parameters. Any request for information about or an The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility interpretation of these practice parameters by the AAAAI or for establishing ‘‘Stinging insect hypersensitivity: a practice the ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is a Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: D. B. K. Golden is on the speakers’ bureau for ALK-Abello and Novartis-Genentech. R. A. -
Moon Buggies and Bags of Poo: What Humans Left on the Moon
Moon Buggies and bags of poo: what humans left on the moon After 50 years of exploration, the lunar junkyard holds nearly 200 tonnes of objects More than half a century of lunar exploration has left its mark on the moon. What Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin described as the “magnificent desolation” of the relentlessly grey surface is littered with clapped-out robots, spacecraft parts, moon buggies (including one with a bible on the dashboard) and technical equipment. Scattered around the Apollo landing sites are other items that were never meant to come home: a falcon’s feather, a javelin, bags of human waste, a family photo and an aluminium figure, the Fallen Astronaut, which lies on its side near a plaque bearing the names of 14 men who died in the pursuit of space exploration. In all, the lunar junkyard holds nearly 200 tonnes of human objects. The dusty remains of five Saturn V rocket stages from the Apollo missions are the heaviest single items. Then there are the wreckages of spacecraft that smashed, or were crashed intentionally at the end of their missions, into the lunar surface. There are a dozen 1960s Soviet Luna probes; nearly twice as many US Rangers, Lunar Orbiters, Surveyors and more recent observatories; at least four Japanese spacecraft, and other robots sent from Europe, China and India. In April, the mangled remains of the first private moon mission, Israel Aerospace Industries’ Beresheet probe, became the latest addition when the lander’s gyroscopes failed. More striking are those that met a more gentle end. Besides all the wreckages strewn across the moon are robotic landers and rovers that simply fell silent, their batteries spent or their hardware worn out. -
NASA's Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How To
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts Release: July 20, 2011 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Revision and History Page Status Revision No. Description Release Date Release Baseline Initial Release 07/20/2011 Update Rev A Updated with imagery from Apollo 10/28/2011 missions 12, 14-17. Added Appendix D: Available Photo Documentation of Apollo Hardware 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration HUMAN EXPLORATION & OPERATIONS MISSION DIRECTORATE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION DIVISION NASA HEADQUARTERS NASA’S RECOMMENDATIONS TO SPACE-FARING ENTITIES: HOW TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE HISTORIC AND SCIENTIFIC VALUE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT ARTIFACTS THIS DOCUMENT, DATED JULY 20, 2011, CONTAINS THE NASA RECOMMENDATIONS AND ASSOCIATED RATIONALE FOR SPACECRAFT PLANNING TO VISIT U.S. HERITAGE LUNAR SITES. ORGANIZATIONS WITH COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR SUGGESTIONS CONCERNING THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD CONTACT NASA’S HUMAN EXPLORATION & OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE, STRATEGIC ANALYSIS & INTEGRATION DIVISION, NASA HEADQUARTERS, 202.358.1570. 3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Table of Contents REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 SECTION A1 – PREFACE, AUTHORITY, AND DEFINITIONS 5 PREFACE 5 DEFINITIONS 7 A1-1 DISTURBANCE 7 A1-2 APPROACH PATH 7 A1-3 DESCENT/LANDING (D/L) BOUNDARY 7 A1-4 ARTIFACT BOUNDARY (AB) 8 A1-5 VISITING VEHICLE SURFACE MOBILITY BOUNDARY (VVSMB) 8 A1-6 OVERFLIGHT -
Art to the Stars: an Historical Perspective on Space Art... Arthur
Art to the Stars: an Historical Perspective on Space Art... Arthur Woods * Most people are probably not aware that the idea of space exploration began in the mind of the artist or that artists have been intimately involved in space exploration from the beginning. Yet long before the first rocket penetrated the atmosphere, artists were making the concept of humanity traveling beyond Earth’s atmosphere a reality. Both a scientific treatise on lunar astronomy and a remarkably foresighted science- fiction story about a voyage to the moon, Johann Kepler’s Somnium, written in 1634, is considered to be the first science fiction book about space. It accurately stated that that the Earth’s atmosphere becomes gradually thinner as one travels further from the planet. Since the first use of the telescope in 1610 and before the invention of the camera, astronomers recorded their observations of the heavens by making drawings of their observations. An early example would be the sketch of the Whirlpool Galaxy made by William Parsons in 1845 who had just constructed the world’s largest telescope. In the mid-nineteenth century artists De Montant, A. De Neuville andEmile Bayard created woodcuts to illustrate Jules Verne's "From the Earth to the Moon" (1865) and his sequel "Around the Moon". A few years later, James Nasmyth's illustrations were the first space landscapes to appear in a non-fiction book: "The Moon". Perhaps the most notable artwork depicting the night sky from this period would be Vincent van Gogh’s Starry Night painted in 1889. Considered to be one of his greatest works, it depicts the view outside his sanitarium room window at night, although it was painted from memory during the day.