Art to the Stars: an Historical Perspective on Space Art... Arthur
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Art Matching
Art Matching Program Type: Demonstration or Classroom Audience Type: Grade 4–adult Program Description: Students explore how artists from different cultures have used art to represent space-related phenomena. Topics: Moon, space travel, art, stars, sky-watching Process Skills Focus: Critical thinking, observing, creativity. LEARNING OBJECTIVES For Next Generation Science Standards alignment, see end of outline. • Many artists are inspired by astronomy and the universe. • Cultures often have their own interpretations of the sky and celestial phenomena. • Art is one of many ways to capture our observations of and reflections on the sky. TIME REQUIRED Advance Prep Set Up Activity Clean Up 15 minutes 5 minutes 10 minutes 5 minutes SITE REQUIREMENTS • Table or other flat surface • Chairs (optional, but helpful for elderly or young audiences) Art Matching 1 Lenses on the Sky OMSI 2017 PROGRAM FORMAT Segment Format Time Introduction Large group discussion 2 min Art Matching Group Activity 5 min Wrap-Up Large group discussion 3 min SUPPLIES Permanent Supplies Amount Notes Laminated pages showing the artists 5 and their work Laminated cards showing 5 astronomical images ADVANCE PREPARATION • Print out, cut, and laminate the pages showing the artists and their work (at the end of the document). • Print out, cut, and laminate the five cards showing the astronomical images (at the end of the document). • Complete the activity to familiarize yourself with the process. SET UP Spread out the five pages showing the artists and their work on the table. Below the pages, place the five cards showing the astronomical objects. INTRODUCTION 2 minutes Let students speculate before offering answers to any questions. -
Martian Crater Morphology
ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter. -
ORION Flight Test Dec
December 2014 Vol. 1 No. 9 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Kennedy Space Center’s ORION Flight Test Dec. 4, 7:05 a.m. #imonboard Colin Baker http://go.nasa.gov/11r6OeO Lou Ferrigno Nichelle Nichols http://go.nasa.gov/1xlmT2f http://go.nasa.gov/11r7fWA Erin Gray John Barrowman http://go.nasa.gov/1AIE28z Austin St. John http://go.nasa.gov/1xlmT2f http://go.nasa.gov/1AIERyd 2 SPACEPORT Magazine SPACEPORT Magazine 3 International Space MARS Education Technology Solar System History Station (ISS) KENNEDY SPACE CENTER’S NASA’S SPACEPORT MAGAZINE LAUNCH SCHEDULE CONTENTS Date: Dec. 4 - 7:05 a.m. EST ...................Orion ready for first test flight Mission: NASA’s Orion 7 spacecraft will launch atop a Delta IV Heavy rocket from Cape 9 ...................Flight Test to carry mementos, inspirational items Canaveral Air Force Stationís Space Launch Complex 37. The Orion Flight Test will evaluate 14 ................IT Advance Concepts Lab changing way IT is done launch and high speed re-entry systems such as avionics, attitude control, parachutes and 22 ................Research ready for SpaceX CRS-5 mission the heat shield. Date: Dec. 16, 2014 - 27 ................Tanzanian teen hopes to become astronaut 2:31 p.m. EST Mission: Launching from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, 30 ................New animation follows long, strange trip of Bennu SpaceX CRS-5 will deliver cargo and crew supplies to the International Space Station. It 33 ................175-ton crane undergoes upgrades also will carry CATS, a laser instrument to measure clouds and the location and distribution 36 ................Ceremony honors fallen astronaut of pollution, dust, smoke and other particulates in the I am the range master at the NASA Protective Services Training atmosphere. -
Original Space Art Purpose
Original Space Art Purpose of Illustrate the precision and beauty of two of America’s premiere space artists. Scope Paul & Chris Calle All material are original sketches and paintings created by Paul and Chris Calle. When a choice of cachets was available, artwork that most closely replicated the postage stamp was chosen. Plan Project Mercury 1959-1963 Project Gemini 1962-1966 Project Apollo 1961-1975 “They really wanted to send a dog, but they decided that would be too cruel.” Alan Shepard In 1962 NASA Administrator Jim Webb invited artists to record the strange new world of space. Of the original cadre, Paul Calle, an illustrator of science fiction book covers, joined Robert McCall and six others and began to sketch. As commissioned artists they received $800 and access to draw a blossoming manned space program. Over the years the NASA Art Program would include the works of pop artist Andy Warhol, photographer Annie Leibovitz, and American illustrator Norman Rockwell. Paul Calle remained associated with NASA from Mercury through Gemini, Apollo, and the Space Shuttle. Over the years, he helped guide his son Chris to become a serious artist in his own right. Paul would design over 50 stamps for the Post Office Department and the US Postal Service including the Gemini space twins in 1967 and the First Man on the Moon issue of 1969. To beat the Soviets in putting a man in space, the US Air Force selected nine pilots Chris collaborated with his father on two space stamps to celebrate the 25th for Man In Space Soonest (MISS). -
Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei -
Floris Heyne Joel Meter Simon Phillipson Delano Steenmeijer
Floris Heyne Joel Meter Simon Phillipson Delano Steenmeijer Edited by Neil Pearson With a special foreword by Apollo 7 astronaut Walt Cunningham “When you get back… you will be a national hero. But your photographs… they will live forever. Your only key to immortality is the quality of your photography.” Richard W. Underwood NASA Chief of Photography for Mercury, Gemini and Apollo 4 Small steps. Giant leaps. The English word ‘photograph’ is made up of the The early exploration of space is one such historical ancient Greek words ‘photos’ and ‘graphos’ which event, unrivaled among humanity’s achievements. literally mean ‘light writing’. At the time of the Apollo Fortunately space travelers were able to bring back program, that meant exposing a chemically-treated beautiful, moving and instantly recognizable images film to patterns of light and it was this process which to depict it. Those images add a new understanding made it possible to seize moments in time and share to what it means to be human, what it means to them with the world. live on a delicate little orb circling the Sun since time immemorial. A single photograph can tell a story to billions of people. It transcends language barriers, physical Not only did Apollo bring us this photographic barriers and requires no prior knowledge of testimony but many major advancements in the subject. This is the beauty of photography: photographic technology date back to the extensive it reaches out to all people and everybody can research and engineering that was part of the hugely intuitively understand its form and content. -
ILWS Report 137 Moon
Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Albury February 2020 © 2011, revised 2020. All rights reserved by the authors. The contents of this publication are copyright in all countries subscribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in existence or to be invented, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the authors, except where permitted by law. Preferred citation of this Report Spennemann, Dirk HR & Murphy, Guy (2020). Returning to the Moon. Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize. Institute for Land, Water and Society Report nº 137. Albury, NSW: Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University. iv, 35 pp ISBN 978-1-86-467370-8 Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are solely the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of Charles Sturt University. Contact Associate Professor Dirk HR Spennemann, MA, PhD, MICOMOS, APF Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury NSW 2640, Australia. email: [email protected] Spennemann & Murphy (2020) Returning to the Moon: Heritage Issues Raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Page ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. HUMAN ARTEFACTS ON THE MOON 3 What Have These Missions Left BehinD? 4 Impactor Missions 10 Lander Missions 11 Rover Missions 11 Sample Return Missions 11 Human Missions 11 The Lunar Environment & ImpLications for Artefact Preservation 13 Decay caused by ascent module 15 Decay by solar radiation 15 Human Interference 16 3. -
TERRAFORMING MARS in a Climate of Existential Risk Keith Mansfield
Journal of the British Interplanetary Society VOLUME 71 NO.9 SEPTEMBER 2018 General Issue PRESERVING GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT: the next steps Mark Hempsell, Roger Longstaff & Sebastiane Alexandra FUTURE RENDEZVOUS AND DOCKING MISSIONS enabled by low-cost but safety compliant Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC) architectures Steve Eckersley et al TERRAFORMING MARS in a climate of existential risk Keith Mansfield www.bis-space.com ISSN 0007-084X PUBLICATION DATE: 10 JANUARY 2019 Submitting papers International Advisory Board to JBIS JBIS welcomes the submission of technical Rachel Armstrong, Newcastle University, UK papers for publication dealing with technical Peter Bainum, Howard University, USA reviews, research, technology and engineering in astronautics and related fields. Stephen Baxter, Science & Science Fiction Writer, UK James Benford, Microwave Sciences, California, USA Text should be: James Biggs, The University of Strathclyde, UK ■ As concise as the content allows – typically 5,000 to 6,000 words. Shorter papers (Technical Notes) Anu Bowman, Foundation for Enterprise Development, California, USA will also be considered; longer papers will only Gerald Cleaver, Baylor University, USA be considered in exceptional circumstances – for Charles Cockell, University of Edinburgh, UK example, in the case of a major subject review. Ian A. Crawford, Birkbeck College London, UK ■ Source references should be inserted in the text in square brackets – [1] – and then listed at the Adam Crowl, Icarus Interstellar, Australia end of the paper. Eric W. Davis, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, USA ■ Illustration references should be cited in Kathryn Denning, York University, Toronto, Canada numerical order in the text; those not cited in the Martyn Fogg, Probability Research Group, UK text risk omission. -
Moon Buggies and Bags of Poo: What Humans Left on the Moon
Moon Buggies and bags of poo: what humans left on the moon After 50 years of exploration, the lunar junkyard holds nearly 200 tonnes of objects More than half a century of lunar exploration has left its mark on the moon. What Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin described as the “magnificent desolation” of the relentlessly grey surface is littered with clapped-out robots, spacecraft parts, moon buggies (including one with a bible on the dashboard) and technical equipment. Scattered around the Apollo landing sites are other items that were never meant to come home: a falcon’s feather, a javelin, bags of human waste, a family photo and an aluminium figure, the Fallen Astronaut, which lies on its side near a plaque bearing the names of 14 men who died in the pursuit of space exploration. In all, the lunar junkyard holds nearly 200 tonnes of human objects. The dusty remains of five Saturn V rocket stages from the Apollo missions are the heaviest single items. Then there are the wreckages of spacecraft that smashed, or were crashed intentionally at the end of their missions, into the lunar surface. There are a dozen 1960s Soviet Luna probes; nearly twice as many US Rangers, Lunar Orbiters, Surveyors and more recent observatories; at least four Japanese spacecraft, and other robots sent from Europe, China and India. In April, the mangled remains of the first private moon mission, Israel Aerospace Industries’ Beresheet probe, became the latest addition when the lander’s gyroscopes failed. More striking are those that met a more gentle end. Besides all the wreckages strewn across the moon are robotic landers and rovers that simply fell silent, their batteries spent or their hardware worn out. -
NASA's Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How To
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Recommendations to Space-Faring Entities: How to Protect and Preserve the Historic and Scientific Value of U.S. Government Lunar Artifacts Release: July 20, 2011 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Revision and History Page Status Revision No. Description Release Date Release Baseline Initial Release 07/20/2011 Update Rev A Updated with imagery from Apollo 10/28/2011 missions 12, 14-17. Added Appendix D: Available Photo Documentation of Apollo Hardware 2 National Aeronautics and Space Administration HUMAN EXPLORATION & OPERATIONS MISSION DIRECTORATE STRATEGIC ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION DIVISION NASA HEADQUARTERS NASA’S RECOMMENDATIONS TO SPACE-FARING ENTITIES: HOW TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE HISTORIC AND SCIENTIFIC VALUE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT ARTIFACTS THIS DOCUMENT, DATED JULY 20, 2011, CONTAINS THE NASA RECOMMENDATIONS AND ASSOCIATED RATIONALE FOR SPACECRAFT PLANNING TO VISIT U.S. HERITAGE LUNAR SITES. ORGANIZATIONS WITH COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR SUGGESTIONS CONCERNING THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD CONTACT NASA’S HUMAN EXPLORATION & OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE, STRATEGIC ANALYSIS & INTEGRATION DIVISION, NASA HEADQUARTERS, 202.358.1570. 3 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Table of Contents REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 SECTION A1 – PREFACE, AUTHORITY, AND DEFINITIONS 5 PREFACE 5 DEFINITIONS 7 A1-1 DISTURBANCE 7 A1-2 APPROACH PATH 7 A1-3 DESCENT/LANDING (D/L) BOUNDARY 7 A1-4 ARTIFACT BOUNDARY (AB) 8 A1-5 VISITING VEHICLE SURFACE MOBILITY BOUNDARY (VVSMB) 8 A1-6 OVERFLIGHT -
Robert T. Mccall INTERVIEW - MARCH 28, 2000 NASA ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Robert T
Robert T. McCall INTERVIEW - MARCH 28, 2000 NASA ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Robert T. McCall 1919 - 2010 JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Interview by Rebecca Wright Phoenix (Paradise Valley), Arizona – March 28, 2000 Oral History Transcript provided by Cam Martin Robert McCall shares his vision and creative endeavors in an exclusive interview in the year 2000, a decade be - fore his passing. For those of us who were fortunate to be in his presence, listen to his presentations, and con - verse with him witnessed the magnitude of his intellect, vision and artistic wisdom. Cam Martin, a career NASA field center aerospace com - munications director, and congressional liaison worked on numerous projects with Robert McCall in the decade after this interview up to his last painting, a portrait of Neil Armstrong. Aero BCaruthsehr, ine A. McCall is the custodian of Robert McCall’s studio: http://www.mccallstudios.com/ Robert McCall’s Oral History was published in journal of the American Society of Aviation Artists, V32N3 (Part 1) and V32N4 (Part 2). Robert Mc - Call was one of five Founders of the American Society of Aviation artists. WRIGHT: Today is March 28, 2000. This oral history is being conducted with Robert McCall in Phoenix, Arizona, for the Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. The in - terviewer is Rebecca Wright, assisted by Carol Butler and Sandra Johnson. Robert T. McCall Thank you again for visiting with us today and for allowing us in your home. that truly telescopes into itself. Just an inexpensive, almost MCCALL : Oh, I’m delighted that you’re here. -
I S Space Art Dead?
The evolving demand for space art has created trying times for space artists. by Lynette R. Cook I S SPACE ART DEAD? First published in Mercury, Spring & Summer 2009. One of twelve illustrations I created for Dava Sobel Courtesy Astronomical Society of the Pacific. to visually express the individual chapters in her book The Planets. Courtesy Lynette R. Cook. For nearly three years I’ve been haunted by a head- line in the Los Angeles Times that read, “Imagine That: NASA’s Photos Eclipse Space Art.” Befuddled and dismayed, my space-art colleagues and I wondered at the time how this message could have bubbled to the surface from the series of informational interviews the writer had conducted about our work and experi- ences. Was this an attempt to sell more newspapers, or had she picked up on a real trend in astronomy and astronomical education that spelled doom for this small group of specialized artists? Whether or not this is the proverbial “writing is on the wall,” the field of space art — the youngest member under the broad umbrella called scientific illustration — has changed since its inception and continues to adapt as technology advances. Just as earlier artists feared that the advent of the camera foretold their demise, the wondrous success of the Hubble Space Telescope and other technological marvels created ripples of uncertainty among space artists. While there is no doubt that space art and artists still exist — after all, look around…space art is everywhere, right? — what is the state of its health? I determined to find out.