DOCSLIB.ORG

SPRINGBROOK CABLEWAY Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SPRINGBROOK CABLEWAY Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment SPRINGBROOK CABLEWAY Preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment Prepared for CITY OF GOLD COAST 27 August 2020 URBIS STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS REPORT WERE: Director Matthew Schneider Associate Director Tina King Project Code P0022215 Report Number Final All information supplied to Urbis in order to conduct this research has been treated in the strictest confidence. It shall only be used in this context and shall not be made available to third parties without client authorisation. Confidential information has been stored securely and data provided by respondents, as well as their identity, has been treated in the strictest confidence and all assurance given to respondents have been and shall be fulfilled. © Urbis Pty Ltd 50 105 256 228 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. You must read the important disclaimer appearing within the body of this report. urbis.com.au CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3. Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. Description of Historical Use ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1. European Settlement ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Construction of Springbrook Road ....................................................................................... 4 2.3. Post War Years .................................................................................................................... 6 3. Identification of Cultural Heritage Values ....................................................................................... 9 3.1. Indigenous Cultural Heritage Values ................................................................................... 9 3.2. Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage Values .........................................................................13 4. Identification of Sustainable Cultural Heritage Options .............................................................17 5. Recommendations ..........................................................................................................................19 References ......................................................................................................................................................20 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................................................21 Appendix A DATSIP Results FIGURES Figure 1 Local Catchment Boundary ................................................................................................................. 1 Figure 2 Early Settlers in Springbrook Region, 1906 ........................................................................................ 3 Figure 3 Tourists at Rainbow Falls c1930s ....................................................................................................... 4 Figure 4 Bushwalkers on Twin Falls track 1938 ................................................................................................ 4 Figure 5 Tourism operator on the original 1914 track from Mudgeeraba to Springbrook c1920s..................... 5 Figure 6 Early Springbrook Road Sign .............................................................................................................. 6 Figure 7 Tulip Farm Café and Restaurant c1950s ............................................................................................ 6 Figure 8 Sunnybrooke Guesthouse c1940s ...................................................................................................... 6 Figure 9 Little Nerang Dam, 1960s .................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 10 Hinze Dam c1970s ............................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 11 Interpretive Signage at QPWS Office ................................................................................................ 9 Figure 12 Interpretive Signage within Springbrook National Park ..................................................................... 9 Figure 13 Location of Wangerriburra (shaded) and surrounding groups ....................................................... 10 Figure 14 Aboriginal Parties in Springbrook Region ....................................................................................... 11 Figure 15 Registered Aboriginal Sites in the Springbrook Region .................................................................. 12 Figure 16 Location of QHR places .................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 17 Location of QHR places in Springbrook Region .............................................................................. 16 URBIS SPRINGBROOK CABLEWAY PRELIMINARY CH ASSESSMENT 27082020.DOCX 1. INTRODUCTION This technical study provides a preliminary Cultural Heritage Assessment associated with any future proposal for a cableway to be established within the Springbrook area of the Gold Coast hinterland. The report forms part of a suite of technical papers being prepared for the City of Gold Coast Council (CoGC) as part of an independent pre-feasibility assessment led by Urbis. In accordance with the CoGC Springbrook Cableway Pre-Feasibility Assessment Scope of Services this CHA provides the following: 1. Description of historical use 2. Identification of cultural heritage values 3. Identification of sustainable cultural heritage options 1.1. BACKGROUND It is assumed that the cableway would commence from a location within the vicinity of Neranwood and continue along a route towards Springbrook. It is unconfirmed where passengers would embark and disembark, including whether there would be a station at Springbrook. It is presumed that some amenities would be provided at the stations, which (based on other similar developments) could include a visitor information centre, servicing infrastructure, public amenities, café, seating, security and waste management facilities. It is also anticipated that carparking would be required at the embarkation point, which would require a large footprint. The local catchment area is shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 Local Catchment Boundary Neranwood Springbrook Source: Urbis 2020 URBIS SPRINGBROOK CABLEWAY PRELIMINARY CH ASSESSMENT 27082020.DOCX INTRODUCTION 1 There have been previous proposals to develop a cableway to Springbrook, the most notable being the 1998 proposal which involved an 11.6km cableway from Mudgeeraba through Springbrook National Park to Springbrook. The proposal was declared a ‘significant project’ and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) drafted to accompany the proposal. This EIS would have included an assessment of heritage impact, however it is noted that heritage legislation has changed since this time, and new heritage places have been identified in the region. 1.2. METHODOLOGY In Australia, the conservation of heritage places is guided by the Australia International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), Burra Charter (Marquis Kyle and Walker 2004). The Burra Charter has been widely adopted as the standard for heritage conservation practice in Australia, providing a guiding philosophy for the care of places of cultural heritage significance. A review of existing publicly available information was undertaken to provide a description of historical use of the area. To gain an idea of existing cultural heritage values of the region, searches of the following databases were undertaken: . World Heritage List . National Heritage List . Commonwealth Heritage List . Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships (DATSIP) Cultural Heritage Database and Register . National Native Title Register . Queensland Heritage Register . Gold Coast Local Heritage Register The key findings of the review and searches were then used to identify potential sustainable cultural heritage options which could be undertaken in association with a potential future cableway. 1.3. LIMITATIONS This assessment takes into account cultural heritage values only. It is acknowledged that there are significant natural heritage values in the region as reflected by the World Heritage status of National Park areas and natural heritage values form part of the ecological assessment. All assessment has been desktop based, and no site inspections or consultation outside of City of Gold Coast has been undertaken. No review of previous cultural heritage assessment undertaken as part of previous cableway proposals has been undertaken. URBIS 2 INTRODUCTION SPRINGBROOK CABLEWAY PRELIMINARY CH ASSESSMENT 27082020.DOCX 2. DESCRIPTION OF HISTORICAL USE This section provides a description of the historical (i.e. non-Indigenous) use of the region. It is noted that prior to European settlement, the Springbrook region was inhabited for thousands of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of a Mass Mortality of Euastacus Valentulus (Decapoda
    Report of a mass mortality of Euastacus valentulus (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in southeast Queensland, Australia, with a discussion of the potential impacts of climate change induced severe weather events on freshwater crayfish species Author Furse, James, Coughran, Jason, Wild, Clyde Published 2012 Journal Title Crustacean Research Copyright Statement © 2012 The Carcinological Society of Japan. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/50569 Link to published version http://rose.hucc.hokudai.ac.jp/~s16828/cr/e-site/Top_page.html Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au CRUSTACEAN RESEARCH, SPECIAL NUMBER 7: 15–24, 2012 Report of a mass mortality of Euastacus valentulus (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in southeast Queensland, Australia, with a discussion of the potential impacts of climate change induced severe weather events on freshwater crayfish species James M. Furse, Jason Coughran and Clyde H. Wild Abstract.—In addition to predicted changes Leckie, 2007) including in “vast” numbers in climate, more frequent and intense severe (Viosca, 1939; Olszewski, 1980). Mass weather events (e.g. tropical cyclones, severe emersions and mortalities have also been storms and droughts) have been identified as recorded in marine crayfish in hypoxic serious and emerging threats to the World’s conditions (Jasus lalandii H. Milne Edwards) freshwater crayfish. This paper documents a (Cockroft, 2001). It is also known that some single, high intensity rainfall event (in an area freshwater crayfish species are particularly known for phenomenal rainfall events) that led sensitive to severe flooding events (Parkyn & to a flash flood and mass mortality of Euastacus Collier, 2004; Meyer et al., 2007) and mass valentulus in the Numinbah Valley of southeast emersions/strandings have been reported in Queensland in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturallygc Full Program Booklet
    CONNECT, CONSERVE, EXPLORE NATURE #NaturallyGC NaturallyGC Program JULY 2021 – JUNE 2022 Connecting the Gold Coast community with nature through free and low-cost environmental workshops, events, activities and sustainable nature-based recreation. NaturallyGC Ambassador MAYOR’S MESSAGE Patrick Brabant “Enviro Warrior” Ruby and Noah Jay Protecting, restoring, and promoting The Gold Coast is one of the most the Gold Coasts natural areas is at the beautiful and biodiverse cities in Australia Helping nature delivers a better community centre of the NaturallyGC program. I and we’re excited to be NaturallyGC am excited to be involved in a unique youth ambassadors for 2021−22! program like NaturallyGC and feel We both love wildlife and are privileged to be one of its ambassadors. passionate about helping to preserve Feeling connected to our natural world is something inherent in the human spirit. It is even more important now in these stressful and restore natural habitats. times that we take time to connect and On weekends, we can often be found The challenges of Covid-19 brought that Thanks to NaturallyGC, the community can experience our local natural environment. desire for better connectivity to the fore help play a vital role in the conservation planting trees in local parks, cleaning – whether it was through people enjoying of our natural areas and get their The NaturallyGC program is an important the beach or co-presenting Junior Wild their local parks and open space or hands dirty by planting native trees or community asset and provides a great Defenders workshops for children. connecting to local organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • 0800 Darwin City Nt 0800 Darwin Nt 0810
    POSTCODE SUBURB STATE 0800 DARWIN CITY NT 0800 DARWIN NT 0810 CASUARINA NT 0810 COCONUT GROVE NT 0810 JINGILI NT 0810 LEE POINT NT 0810 WANGURI NT 0810 MILLNER NT 0810 MOIL NT 0810 MUIRHEAD NT 0810 NAKARA NT 0810 NIGHTCLIFF NT 0810 RAPID CREEK NT 0810 TIWI NT 0810 WAGAMAN NT 0810 BRINKIN NT 0810 ALAWA NT 0810 LYONS NT 0812 ANULA NT 0812 BUFFALO CREEK NT 0812 WULAGI NT 0812 MARRARA NT 0812 MALAK NT 0812 LEANYER NT 0812 KARAMA NT 0812 HOLMES NT 0820 BAYVIEW NT 0820 COONAWARRA NT 0820 EAST POINT NT 0820 EATON NT 0820 FANNIE BAY NT 0820 LARRAKEYAH NT 0820 WOOLNER NT 0820 THE NARROWS NT 0820 THE GARDENS NT 0820 STUART PARK NT 0820 PARAP NT 0820 LUDMILLA NT 0820 WINNELLIE NT 0822 MICKETT CREEK NT 0822 FREDS PASS NT 0822 GUNN POINT NT 0822 HIDDEN VALLEY NT 0822 MANDORAH NT 0822 MCMINNS LAGOON NT 0822 MURRUMUJUK NT 0822 TIVENDALE NT 0822 WAGAIT BEACH NT 0822 WEDDELL NT 0822 WICKHAM NT 0822 WISHART NT 0822 BEES CREEK NT 0822 BELYUEN NT 0822 CHANNEL ISLAND NT 0822 CHARLES DARWIN NT 0822 COX PENINSULA NT 0822 EAST ARM NT 0822 ELRUNDIE NT 0828 KNUCKEY LAGOON NT 0828 BERRIMAH NT 0829 PINELANDS NT 0829 HOLTZE NT 0830 DRIVER NT 0830 ARCHER NT 0830 DURACK NT 0830 FARRAR NT 0830 GRAY NT 0830 YARRAWONGA NT 0830 MOULDEN NT 0830 PALMERSTON NT 0830 SHOAL BAY NT 0830 WOODROFFE NT 0830 MARLOW LAGOON NT 0832 BELLAMACK NT 0832 BAKEWELL NT 0832 GUNN NT 0832 ZUCCOLI NT 0832 ROSEBERY NT 0832 MITCHELL NT 0832 JOHNSTON NT 0834 VIRGINIA NT 0835 HOWARD SPRINGS NT 0836 GIRRAWEEN NT 0839 COOLALINGA NT 1340 KINGS CROSS NSW 2000 BARANGAROO NSW 2000 DAWES POINT NSW 2000 HAYMARKET
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Analysis and Modelling of the Manganese Cycle in The
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 8 (2016) 69–81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrh Statistical analysis and modelling of the manganese cycle in the subtropical Advancetown Lake, Australia a a a,∗ b Edoardo Bertone , Rodney A. Stewart , Hong Zhang , Kelvin O’Halloran a Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, QLD 4215, Australia b Seqwater, Ipswich, QLD 4305, Australia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Study region: Advancetown Lake, South-East Queensland (Australia). Keywords: Study focus: A detailed analysis of available meteorological, physical and chemical data Manganese (mostly coming from a vertical profiler remotely collecting data every 3 h) was performed in Vertical profiling system Transport processes order to understand and model the manganese cycle. A one-dimensional model to calculate Mixing processes manganese vertical velocities was also developed. New hydrological insights for the region: The soluble manganese concentration in the hypolimnion is dominantly dependent on the dissolved oxygen level, pH and redox potential, which determine the speed of the biogeochemical reactions between different manganese oxidation states. In contrast, the manganese level in the epilimnion is mainly affected by the transport processes from the hypolimnion and thus to the strength of the thermal stratification, with high concentrations recorded solely during the winter lake cir- culation and wind playing only a minor role. The value of the peak concentration was found to be proportional to the amount of manganese in the hypolimnion and to the temperature of the water column at the beginning of the circulation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Fadden Oxley Mcpherson Longman Brisbane Rankin
    Meldale Toorbul Wamuran ! Wamuran Basin B P Banksia Beach E D u E A m R i O c e B R s Braydon Beach U to n R e Bellara R U Ningi B ! ! M R Moodlu Bald Pocket I PROPOSED BOUNDARIES AND NAMES FOR S Comboyuro Point Spitfire Beach B R ISLAND A FISHER O R OAD ! Woorim N Campbells Pocket A FEDERAL ELECTORAL DIVISIONS IN QUEENSLAND P E E D a s s Mount Mee IE a IB g Y Y LONGMAN BR Map of the proposed Divisions of : e O Sandstone Point C ! ! ! L I Bongaree K LAKE Caboolture Skirmish Point BLAIR (PART),BONNER BONNER (PART), BOWMAN, BRISBANE, DICKSON, FADDEN, SOMERSET Bellmere LONGMAN Godwin FORDE, GRIFFITH, LILLEY, LONGMAN (PART), MCPHERSON, MONCRIEFF, Beach Bald Point MORETON, OXLEY, PETRIE, RANKIN, RYAN and WRIGHT (PART) Red Beach Warrajamba Beach Rocksberg South Point ( Sheet 3 of 3 ) Morayfield BONNER ! # Mount Byron Upper Caboolture Boundaries of proposed Divisions shown thus W K K O S N O Boundaries of existing Divisions shown thus E o D r F This map has been produced by Terranean Mapping Pty Ltd B Cowan Cowan t h O R R ! Boundaries of Local Government Areas thown thus D D D ! Beachmere from data sourced from Geoscience Australia and Australian MORETON BAY REGIONAL U A O C R Electoral Commision. E E Disclaimer The Redistribution Committee for Queensland made its proposed redistribution of the federal electoral boundaries for Queensland. This map is one of a series of four that shows the namesEager and boundariesBeach of the proposed Electoral Divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Queensland Roads 2011
    3 DC34 Russell PARK RIDGE )92 EAGLEBY 94 3 ) Island WATERFORD ) DC34 ALBERTON North 2 Beenleigh 6 Stradbroke 0246 7D 8 1 DC35 LOGAN RESERVE STAPYLTON Island km 0 95 0 1 1 0 ) 94 6 ) 0 1 2 DC35 Ó GREENBANK 2 12 S WOONGOOLBA MUNRUBEN STEIGLITZ ² BAHRS SCRUB C ² D38 Cabbage Tree Point 13 Buccan DC38 P GILBERTON Woongoolba A C CHAMBERS FLAT I F DC41 Y 3 I 0 A BELIVAH YATAL A C 0 5 Eden W 7 H 0 1 Island G DC41 I STOCKLEIGH 0 H Logan Village 7 È 91 985# È Kangaroo #North Maclean M1 4 Island WOLFFDENE NORWELL 0 DC45 Jacobs Well 2 SOUTH MACLEAN 0 2 4 656 2 LUSCOMBE #132 Ormeau SOUTHERN MORETON 05 5 0 88 )92 0 ) BAY ISLANDS ) 0 7 NATIONAL PARK DC 0 Woongoompa 2 45 1 0 0 Pimpama Island 1 1 DC 1 49 0 1 YARRABILBA 0 KINGSHOLME Jimboomba Y DC A 49 S M E CEDAR CREEK O D T ² ² IN O L R 13 W South WILLOW VALE A Stradbroke CEDAR GROVE Y )95 Island Coomera DC54 Ó Island SOUTH 5 S 1 Mount 0 E C 1 Wongawallan D54 2 COOMERA HOPE ISLAND Tamborine TA MBO RINE CEDAR VALE 0 2 NATIONAL ¢ 4 ) 2 ) 92 1 ) : 0 DC57 PARADISE POINT 0 PARK 9 9 10 14 DC57 3 11 )95 PACIFIC 92 WONGAWALLAN 3 Oxenford # Mundoolun 8 8 5 58 )95 5 HOLLYWELL VERESDALE SCRUB 516 DC T 95 60 ) 0 Crab N 0 5 U 5 5 Island 1 O 0 0 C HELENSVALE M 1 0 D60 RUNAWAY BAY È 1 Tamborine E È Mount Dunsinane 0 ID 9 Mountain Eagle Heights 0 M1 E 1 COOMBABAH 0 DC62 8 )2 North Tamborine 7 OCEAN GLENEAGLE MAUDSLAND C G D62 OL BIGGERA WATERS BOYLAND 90 GUANABA D BIRNAM ) CO ² A ² 90 PACIFIC PINES ST ) ARUNDEL HW 0 Y 4 13 3 8 1 ¢ 5 7 5 )4 9: )LABRADOR MAIN BEACH 4 )2 DC66 PARKWOOD ) GAVEN The Spit 010 Wonglepong )90
    [Show full text]
  • Suburb State Postcode
    Suburb State Postcode STANLEY TAS 7331 ALCOMIE TAS 7330 ARTHUR RIVER TAS 7330 BRITTONS SWAMP TAS 7330 CHRISTMAS HILLS TAS 7330 COUTA ROCKS TAS 7330 EDITH CREEK TAS 7330 FOREST TAS 7330 HUNTER ISLAND TAS 7330 IRISHTOWN TAS 7330 LILEAH TAS 7330 MARRAWAH TAS 7330 MELLA TAS 7330 MENGHA TAS 7330 MONTAGU TAS 7330 NABAGEENA TAS 7330 REDPA TAS 7330 ROBBINS ISLAND TAS 7330 ROGER RIVER TAS 7330 SCOPUS TAS 7330 SCOTCHTOWN TAS 7330 SMITHTON TAS 7330 SOUTH FOREST TAS 7330 TEMMA TAS 7330 THREE HUMMOCK ISLAND TAS 7330 TOGARI TAS 7330 TROWUTTA TAS 7330 WEST MONTAGU TAS 7330 CALDER TAS 7325 DOCTORS ROCKS TAS 7325 ELLIOTT TAS 7325 FLOWERDALE TAS 7325 KELLATIER TAS 7325 LAPOINYA TAS 7325 MEUNNA TAS 7325 MILABENA TAS 7325 MOORLEAH TAS 7325 MYALLA TAS 7325 OLDINA TAS 7325 PREOLENNA TAS 7325 SISTERS CREEK TAS 7325 TABLE CAPE TAS 7325 TAKONE TAS 7325 WEST TAKONE TAS 7325 WYNYARD TAS 7325 YOLLA TAS 7325 MOUNT HICKS TAS 7325 SEABROOK TAS 7322 SOMERSET TAS 7322 BLACK RIVER TAS 7321 BOAT HARBOUR TAS 7321 BOAT HARBOUR BEACH TAS 7321 BRICKMAKERS BAY TAS 7321 BRICKMAKERS BEACH TAS 7321 BULGOBAC TAS 7321 CORINNA TAS 7321 COWRIE POINT TAS 7321 CRAYFISH CREEK TAS 7321 DETENTION TAS 7321 DETENTION RIVER TAS 7321 EDGCUMBE BEACH TAS 7321 GLANCE CREEK TAS 7321 GUILDFORD TAS 7321 GUILDFORD JUNCTION TAS 7321 HAMPSHIRE TAS 7321 HELLYER TAS 7321 HELLYER BEACH TAS 7321 HIGHCLERE TAS 7321 LUINA TAS 7321 MAWBANNA TAS 7321 MONTUMANA TAS 7321 MOOREVILLE TAS 7321 NATONE TAS 7321 OONAH TAS 7321 PARRAWE TAS 7321 PORT LATTA TAS 7321 RIDGLEY TAS 7321 ROCKY CAPE TAS 7321 SAVAGE RIVER TAS
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage
    Table of Contents 17 Cultural Heritage 17-3 17.1 Indigenous Cultural Heritage 17-3 17.1.1 Description of Environmental Values 17-3 17.1.2 Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures 17-4 17.2 Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage 17-4 17.2.1 Introduction 17-4 17.2.2 Methodology 17-4 17.2.3 Non-Indigenous History 17-4 17.2.4 Significant Site/Places 17-6 17.2.5 Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures 17-8 Figures Figure 17-1 Sites of Cultural Significance 17-7 17-1 17-2 17 Cultural Heritage 17.1 Indigenous Cultural Heritage 17.1.1 Description of Environmental Values Early European settlement in the area now known as the Gold Coast displaced many Aborigines from the traditional country. Among the Aborigines that remained on the Gold Coast several became well known to the European community and are recorded in historical documents. It is sometimes difficult to determine the specific region that was the traditional country of people featured in many of the early historical documents, due to the movement of individuals and family. Extensive research has enabled some very detailed accounts of the lives of a few of the Aborigines that lived in the Gold Coast region over 100 years ago. Throughout the late 1800s and early 1900s the traditional Aboriginal people of the region had to adapt to many changes. Their freedom was at the mercy of government officials who would have preferred that no Aborigines lived near European settlement. Employment was a crucial factor that enabled many Aborigines to survive in their traditional lands.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. Members of Tne Nerang Kiver Tribe at Their Campsite Near Southport
    15. Members of tne Nerang Kiver tribe at their campsite near Southport, circa 1889. 16. THE GOLD COAST: ITS FIRST INHABITANTS by R.I. Longhurst B.A. (Hons) A.L.A.A.* We know very little about the aboriginal inhabitants of the Gold Coast, or at least much less than we know about neighbouring areas where tribal members survived to be interviewed by scientific researchers this century. Much of what we do know comes from the memoirs of early European settlers who more often than not regarded the few surviving aborigines as pitiful novelties, the objects of charity in the form of ragged clothing and alcohol. Only a very few, such as the early timber-getter Edmund Harper, ever tried to understand and learn from them. Certainly, by 1900 there remained only a few fiill-blooded natives of the original South Coast tribes. The 1901 Queensland census was the first to actually provide statistics of the aboriginal population of the state. In the Logan stat­ istical division of which the Gold Coast was only a very small part, eighty-one aborigines, both full- and half-blood, were counted. This figure comprised forty-nine males, and thirty- two females.1 This compares with an estimate of 1500 to 2000 natives living in the watershed of the Logan, Albert, Coomera and Nerang Rivers in the 1850s.2 Harper, reminiscing in 1894, recalled the 'Tulgigin' tribe of the North Arm of the Tweed, numbering 'some two hundred. The men were nearly all big stout fellows, some of them over six feet in height, and weighing up to fourteen stone'.3 Laila Haglvmd's archaeological
    [Show full text]
  • SEQ Catchments Members Association Members List As at February 2016
    SEQ Catchments Members Association Members List as at February 2016 ICM and Landcare Division Maroochy, Mooloola, Noosa Catchment Barung Landcare Association Ltd Maroochy Landcare Maroochy Waterwatch Mooloolah River Waterwatch and Landcare Inc Noosa and District Landcare Noosa Integrated Catchment Association Petrie Creek Catchment Care Group Inc Pine and Pumicestone Catchment Currimundi Catchment Care Group Inc Pine Rivers Catchment Association Pumicestone Region Catchment Coordination Association Lower Brisbane, Tingalpa Creek, Moreton and Stradbroke Islands Catchment Bayside Creeks Catchment Group Inc Brisbane Catchments Network Bulimba Creek Catchment Cubberla-Witton Catchments Network Eprapah Creek Catchment Landcare Association Inc Fox Gully Bushcare Group Friends of Salvin Creek Bushcare Group Hemmant - Tingalpa Wetlands Conservation Group Hemmant Village Heritage Bushcare Group Jamboree Residents Association Inc Karawatha Forest Protection Society Men of the Trees Inc Moggill Creek Catchment Management Group Mt Gravatt Environment Group Norman Creek Catchment Coordinating Committee Oxley Creek Catchment Association Inc Phillips Creek Bushcare Group Point Lookout Bushcare Pullen Pullen Catchment Group Save Our Waterways Now South Stradbroke Island Landcare Group Inc Wahminda Grove Bushcare Group Whites Hill - Pine Mountain Community Group Wishart Outlook Bushland Care Group Wolston and Centenary Catchments Wolston Creek Bushcare Group Albert, Logan, Coomera, Currumbin, Nerang and Tallebudgera Creek Catchment Austinville Landcare
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Coast Logistics Hub Arundel, QLD
    Gold Coast Logistics Hub Arundel, QLD Information Memorandum Preleases Available 2,000sqm to 30,000sqm goldcoastlogisticshub.com Location Gold Coast Logistics Hub is the region’s newest industrial location servicing both the central Gold Coast Region and Northern NSW. The site is easily accessed from The Gold Coast Highway, the direct link to the M1 Motorway. The estate is a master planned 22ha site offering 24/7 operation within a Yatala rapidly maturing region. M1 Ormeau South Coomera Stradbroke Island Surfers Paradise Wongawallan Southport CBD Napper Road Gold Coast Logistics hub 75km M1 Brisbane Airport Southport Nerang Surfers Paradise 38km Broadbeach Gold Coast Airport Gold Coast Robina Logistics Hub Burleigh Heads 24km Numinbah valley Yatala Enterprise Area Captain Cook Drive Austinville Gold Coast Airport M1 75km Port of Brisbane Gold Coast Hwy Location Access AccessAccess Oxenford GOLD COAST HIGHWAY Helensvale GOLD COAST HIGHWAY GOLD COAST HIGHWAY Gold Coast Highway GOLD COAST HIGHWAY Gold Coast Highway CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE MULTI DIRECTIONS INTERSECTION MULTI DIRECTIONS INTERSECTION M1 Gold Coast Logistics Hub GC 1 INDUSTRIAL PARK GC 1 INDUSTRIAL PARK CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE Gaven Captain Cook Drive Gold Coast Southport Logistics Hub Ashmore NAPPER ROAD NAPPER ROAD CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE 6km CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE M1 Motorway Nerang NapperNAPPER Road ROAD CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE 9km CAPTAIN COOK DRIVE NAPPER ROAD MULTI DIRECTIONS INTERSECTION Southport District MULTI DIRECTIONS INTERSECTION LOGOS 7 LOGOS 7 The Site At a glance – Address Infrastructure Captain Cook Drive, Arundel, QLD 4214 All services are available to the estate Estate Area Site Advantages Approximately 22.16ha This strategic location allows operators the ability to efficiently move freight north-south as well as servicing the Council greater South East QLD corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 1St Queensland Pest Animal and Weed Symposium
    PAWS 2019 PEST ANIMAL & WEED SYMPOSIUM 2019 20-23 MAY 2019, SEA WORLD RESORT CONFERENCE CENTRE, GOLD COAST, AUSTRALIA Get on board Proceedings of the 1st Queensland Pest Animal and Weed Symposium www.wsq.org.auwww.QWS2017.com #QWS2017 | 1 PEST ANIMAL & WEED SYMPOSIUM 2019 WELCOME MESSAGE It is my pleasure to welcome you all to the inaugural 2019 Pest Animal and Weed Symposium on the Gold Coast. Thanks to the backing of the Weed Society of Queensland and the strong support from delegates and presenters, we are pleased to deliver a symposium that is relevant to the entire industry. I would also like to thank our sponsors, exhibitors, event managers and committee volunteers for their contributions towards the success of this year’s symposium. I’m sure you will agree we have a great program, with an inspiring opening address, three exceptional keynote speakers, 50 oral presentations, five speed presentations, eight video submissions and 20 posters on display, we hope to encourage delegates to challenge themselves in managing pest animals and weeds. Please take the time to share your knowledge and I look forward to meeting all of you at this year’s symposium. Chairperson 2019 Queensland Pest Animal and Weed Symposium BROUGHT TO YOU BY www.wsq.org.au @weedsocietyqld #paws2019 SYMPOSIUM PROGRAM DAY ONE: MONDAY, 20 MAY 2019 4:30pm - 7:00pm Registration Desk Open Sea World Resort Conference Centre 5:00pm - 7:00pm Welcome Reception Location: Exhibition Area, Sea World Resort Conference Centre Dress: Smart Casual 6:00pm Welcome Address Cr Hermann
    [Show full text]