DOCSLIB.ORG

)Esign of the Fishery Research Vessel Oregon !!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
)Esign of the Fishery Research Vessel Oregon !! )esign of the Fishery Resea rch Vessel Oregon !! UNITED S1 ATES DEPART MENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Circular 256 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary David S. Black, Under Secretary Stanley A. Cain, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Clarence F. Pautzke, Commissioner BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES, H. E. Crowther, Director Design of the Fishery Research Vessel Oregon II By FRANCIS Jo CAPTIVA Circular 256 Washington, D.C. April 1968 CONTENTS Page Introduction. • . • . 1 Design developITlent . 2 Extended operating range 2 High cruising speed. 2 Versatility. 3 Aut 0 ITl ati on. • . • • • 3 Research facilities 3 Habitability . • 3 Seaworthiness. 3 Seakindliness 3 Safety. • • • . 3 ArrangeITlent . 3 Maneuverability 3 Reserve displaceITlent 3 Future ITlaintenance . 3 General description. 3 Vessel clas sification. 4 ArrangeITlent. • • . • 4 Subdivision. 4 Deck arrangeITlent . 4 Interior arrangeITlent . 5 Machinery. • . 5 Main propulsion . • 5 Auxiliary ITlachinery • • • • • • . • . • • • • . • . • • • . • . • . •. 6 Deck ITlachinery 6 Laboratories. • . • • • . • • . 7 Wet laboratory. • . • • . • • . 7 Hydrographic and cheITlical laboratory 7 SpeciITlen laboratory • • . • • 7 Live speciITlen laboratory. • . 8 Dry laboratory and darkrooITl 8 InstrUITlentation laboratory 8 Electronic equipITlent . 8 Model testing prograITl 8 Still water tests 9 Seakeeping tests 9 Design features 9 References. 10 Appendix A • • • • 11 Appendix B • • • 19 Cover Photo--Oregon II ITlaking 14 knots on sea trials. iii Design of the Fishery Research Vessel Oregon II By FRANCIS J. CAPTIVA, Fleet Supervisor Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Exploratory Fishing and Gear Research Base Pascagoula, Mississippi 39567 ABSTRACT This paper describes the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries research vessel Oregon II. The vessel has been designed for exploratory fishing and gear development studies in the tropical and subtropical portions of the western Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea. It will be 170 feet long, will have a mean draft of 12-1/2 feet, and a beam of 34 feet. Two 800- horsepower engines will propel it through a single propeller. The vessel incorporates many innovations for ease, safety, and flexibility in gear handling. INTRODUCTION Commercial fishery research and fishing gear studies of the United States Government are done by the Bureau of Commercial Fish­ eries of the United States Department of the Interior. This Bureau, which operates fishery research vessels in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the Great Lakes, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Caribbean Sea, is now modernizing ., its fleet with new vessels. .' This paper describes the features of a modern fishery research vessel designed pri­ marily for exploratory fishing surveys, commercial- scale fishing operations, fishing gear development studies, and oceanographic research in the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea, and the tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean. This vessel, which is to be named Oregon g, is the seventh research vessel contracted for by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in the past 3 years. It replaces the fishery research vessel Oregon (figure 1) a converted 1 OO-foot tuna clipper that has carried out most of the fishery research work for the past 15 years in the Gulf and southwest Atlantic. Oregon !! will have much greater capabilities than her predecessor, for she has been designed expressly to: (1) meet the needs that have become apparent during the Figure l.--R. V. Oregon - 100-foot converted tuna clipper 15 years, and (2) have the features considered used in exploratory fishing surveys in the Gulf of mc-st desirable by many of the leading de­ Mexico and southwestern North Atlantic Ocean during Signers of research vessels. 1950-65. The primary aim of this vessel is to in­ specifications; and (3) the Bureau of Com­ crease the production of United States fisher­ mercial Fisheries Vessel Design Committee men by conducting: (1) exploratory fishing provided objective review and counsel through­ surveys to determine if commercially har­ out the design period. vestable fishery stocks are available in un­ The design evolved around the following explored areas; (2) fishing trials with con­ principal criteria: ventional and new types of fishing gear to develop improved fishing methods and tech­ Extended Operating Range niques; and (3) surveys of the Gulf, Caribbean, Many of the surveys will be off the coasts and middle and south Atlantic regions to of foreign countries. The ship must have determine the identity, abundance, and dis­ independence at sea because many of these tribution of the marine fauna. countries are relatively underdeveloped, thus The original design, which is described making it difficult, or impos sible, to obtain here, has special and unique features that uncontaminated water, suitable fuel and lu­ will probably be incorporated into the vessel bricating oil, and vessel stores. An operating when money is available. range of 9,000 nautical miles and 60 days endurance before return to port for bunkering DESIGN DEVELOPMENT and supplies was considered minimal. The design was developed by the joint ef­ High Cruising Speed forts of three groups: (1) staff members of A cruising speed of 13 to 15 knots is the Exploratory Fishing and Gear Research desired, so that running time to and from Base, Pascagoula, Mississippi, prepared the distant portions of the assigned area is kept preliminary operational criteria; (2) Robert to a minimum, leaving more working time H. Macy, Naval Architect and Marine Engineer a vailable. The difference in available work of Pascagoula, Mississippi, developed the time that results from higher cruising speed design and prepared the contract plans and is shown in figure 2. OREGON (CALCULATED) OREGON n (PREDICTED) DATA FROM OREGON CRUISES 47 , 53 AND 84 58.7% 31.3 DAYS 55% 1. AVERAGE DURATION=53 .3 DAYS 29.5 2. DISTANCE TRAVELED=6,000 DAYS I,. .....- ....... .. MILES ~:::::: CRUISING SPEED OREGON 8.5 50 .... ~~::::....... ::: KNOTS ::::::::: CRUISING SPEED OREGON II 13 :::;;:.::=. KNOTS ::.:~~.:.:: IoU .. -..... :IE :.:.:.:::::' LEGEND r- 40 IoU CI) :> II:: PORT AND BUNKERS (,) .... ~!'j~~••••••• 28% 0 ..::.::•. 15 0 r- z 7( ·::DAYS IoU :.:-.: (,) II:: ..... IoU Q.. RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Figure 2.--Comparison of running time versus work time for Oregon and Oregon ~ 2 Versatility Seakindliness It is rrtandatory for the vessel to be able to It is not always easy to define "seakindli­ perforrrt a wide variety of fishing and resource­ ness," which is the surrt total of rrtany char­ evaluation activities during any cruise with­ acteristics. We need a vessel that can be used out rrtodification to structure, rrtachinery, or in fishing and oceanographic operations in the existing arrangerrtents. To assess the fishery open sea in sea states caused by winds as resources of a given area requires sarrtpling high as Beaufort 8 (36 knots). The ability to with a wide assortrrtent of fishing gear be­ heave-to corrtfortably is a special design re­ cause each type of fishing gear is highly se- quirerrtent. 1 ecti ve in what it catche s. Safety Automation Vessel safety standards are in accordance An autorrtated fishing gear and catch-handling with applicable United States laws and re­ corrtplex is needed to keep the vessel crew quirerrtents. to a rrtinirrturrt and the ratio of crew to scien­ tists at or near 1: 1. Arrangement Research Facilities Laboratories and living spaces are located within the area of least rrtotion. Most working Laboratory facilities are needed for spe­ and living areas are accessible without need cialists (and their equiprrtent) in the different to traverse the open deck. fields of exploratory fishing, gear research, biology, technology, and oceanography, thereby Maneuverability precluding the need to transport personnel and equiprrtent to and frorrt distant-water High rrtaneuverability is needed, together ports as the cruise airrts change. with refined speed control frorrt dead-in-the­ water to rrtaxirrturrt speed. Habitability Reserve Displacement To enable us to hire and keep qualified per sonnel and to ensure their well-being and This is necessary for safe accorrtrrtodation high productive effort during long cruises, of additional loads. living quarters rrtust be as attractive and spacious as possible. Future Maintenance Si rrtplicity and dependability of rrtachinery corrtponents and arrangerrtents, and adherence to rrtodern concepts of corrosion control prac­ tices, are necessary to keep operation and rrtaintenance costs to a rrtinirrturrt. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The hull forrrt is that of the North Atlantic distant water trawler, a vessel type con­ sidered to have superior seakeeping qualities. The conventional trawler deck arrangerrtent has been rrtodified to enable the vessel, with­ out further rigging or alteration, to function as a side trawler, stern trawler, double­ rigged shrirrtp trawler, purse seiner, longliner, gill netter, or shellfish dredger (fig. 4). There is a partial deck below the rrtain deck, two Figure 3.--Master's stateroom--double-berth cabins for superstrucfure decks, and a forecastle. crew and scientists are similar in decor and arrange­ Fourteen crewrrten and 11 scientists can be ment. accorrtrrtodated in one- and tWO-rrtan cabins with facilitie s for off-duty relaxation and study. All living and rrtost working spaces are Seaworthiness air conditioned and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EMB PP25 Research Vessels
    EUROPEAN Next generation Position Paper 25 MARINE BOARD European Research Vessels Next generation European Research Vessels Current status and Foreseeable Evolution Cover Photo: View from the L'Atalante afterdeck while the ship is maneuvering. The L'Atalante is a research vessel of the French oceanographic fleet operated by Ifremer. This operation named Cassiopée, took place in the Pacific Ocean in 2015. Credit: © Ifremer/Ird - N. Lamande European Marine Board IVZW Belgian Enterprise Number: 0650.608.890 Wandelaarkaai 7 I 8400 Ostend I Belgium Tel.: +32(0)59 34 01 63 I Fax: +32(0)59 34 01 65 E-mail: [email protected] www.marineboard.eu EMB_PP25_Research_Vessels_cover_11mm.indd 1-3 17/10/19 21:51 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS European Marine Board The European Marine Board provides a pan-European platform for its member organizations to develop common priorities, to advance marine research, and to bridge the gap between science and policy in order to meet future marine science challenges and opportunities. The European Marine Board was established in 1995 to facilitate enhanced cooperation between European marine science organizations towards the development of a common vision on the strategic research priorities for marine science in Europe. Members are either major national marine or oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies, or national consortia of universities with a strong marine research focus. In 2019, the European Marine Board represents 33 Member Organizations from 18 countries. The Board provides the essential components for transferring knowledge for leadership in marine research in Europe. Adopting a strategic role, the European Marine Board serves its member organizations by providing a forum within which marine research policy advice to national agencies and to the European Commission is developed, with the objective of promoting the establishment of the European Research Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson Ship Specifications
    VESSELS SUPPORTING OCEAN EXPLORATION AND RESEARCH Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson The R/V Thomas G. Thompson is owned by the U.S. Navy Office of Naval Research and is operated by the Ship Specifications School of Oceanography at the University of Washington. The Thompson measures 274 feet in Length: 273 ft (Global Class) length and draws 19 feet with a full load. Normal Draft: 17 ft cruising speed for the ship is 11 knots. Speed: 11 knots Range: 11,300 nm Endurance: 60 days Core Capabilities Berthing: 22 crew, 38 mission personnel The Thompson is equipped for multidisciplinary Commissioned: 1991 research projects involving large science parties. The Sonar Systems: 30 kHz Kongsberg EM 302 vessel can berth up to 36 scientific personnel, 21 multibeam sonar, 3.5 kHz Knudsen 3260 sub‐ officers and crew, and two marine technicians. bottom profiler, ADCP Laboratory space includes a large dry lab, wet lab, two Other Capabilities: Designed for interoperability bioanalytical labs, and a “hydro” lab. The hydro lab of projects, including full ocean depth CTDs, AUVs, is where scientists typically direct any ROV and AUV and deep ocean ROVs operations. The Thompson has three winches, three cranes, and an A‐Frame for launching scientific equipment. It is also equipped with an EM 302 multibeam sonar system, sub‐bottom profiler, ADCP system, and CTD/rosette. A number of ROV and AUV systems have been deployed from Thompson. OER Use Thompson is one of the primary vessels that OER has used to support major expeditions in remote regions of the Pacific Ocean. The vast majority of these expeditions were identified through the competitive peer review proposal process.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004
    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004 Institute of the North • U.S. Arctic Research Commission • International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Ocean Marine Routes This map is a general portrayal of the major Arctic marine routes shown from the perspective of Bering Strait looking northward. The official Northern Sea Route encompasses all routes across the Russian Arctic coastal seas from Kara Gate (at the southern tip of Novaya Zemlya) to Bering Strait. The Northwest Passage is the name given to the marine routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans along the northern coast of North America that span the straits and sounds of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Three historic polar voyages in the Central Arctic Ocean are indicated: the first surface shop voyage to the North Pole by the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Arktika in August 1977; the tourist voyage of the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Sovetsky Soyuz across the Arctic Ocean in August 1991; and, the historic scientific (Arctic) transect by the polar icebreakers Polar Sea (U.S.) and Louis S. St-Laurent (Canada) during July and August 1994. Shown is the ice edge for 16 September 2004 (near the minimum extent of Arctic sea ice for 2004) as determined by satellite passive microwave sensors. Noted are ice-free coastal seas along the entire Russian Arctic and a large, ice-free area that extends 300 nautical miles north of the Alaskan coast. The ice edge is also shown to have retreated to a position north of Svalbard. The front cover shows the summer minimum extent of Arctic sea ice on 16 September 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 MTS Overview of Manned Underwater Vehicle Activity
    P A P E R 2007 MTS Overview of Manned Underwater Vehicle Activity AUTHOR ABSTRACT William Kohnen There are approximately 100 active manned submersibles in operation around the world; Chair, MTS Manned Underwater in this overview we refer to all non-military manned underwater vehicles that are used for Vehicles Committee scientific, research, tourism, and commercial diving applications, as well as personal leisure SEAmagine Hydrospace Corporation craft. The Marine Technology Society committee on Manned Underwater Vehicles (MUV) maintains the only comprehensive database of active submersibles operating around the world and endeavors to continually bring together the international community of manned Introduction submersible operators, manufacturers and industry professionals. The database is maintained he year 2007 did not herald a great through contact with manufacturers, operators and owners through the Manned Submersible number of new manned submersible de- program held yearly at the Underwater Intervention conference. Tployments, although the industry has expe- The most comprehensive and detailed overview of this industry is given during the UI rienced significant momentum. Submersi- conference, and this article cannot cover all developments within the allocated space; there- bles continue to find new applications in fore our focus is on a compendium of activity provided from the most dynamic submersible tourism, science and research, commercial builders, operators and research organizations that contribute to the industry and who share and recreational work; the biggest progress their latest information through the MTS committee. This article presents a short overview coming from the least likely source, namely of submersible activity in 2007, including new submersible construction, operation and the leisure markets.
    [Show full text]
  • National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory for the Month Ending
    U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory For the Month Ending January 31, 2020 Beginning of Month Vessel Count: 89 End of Month Vessel Count: 89 The National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory is a monthly federal property accounting report for vessels under the ownership or custody of MARAD. The report further officially assigns vessels to an Accountable MARAD Division. Produced and Distributed by Division of Sealift Operations and Emergency Response (MAR-612) on February 11, 2020 02/11/2020 1/15 No Changes Recorded During Period Starting Date: January 01, 2020 Ending Date: January 31, 2020 Effective Date Remarks 02/11/2020 2/15 NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET INVENTORY MAR-612: RESERVE FLEET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MONTHLY REPORT AS OF January 31, 2020 Glossary Program Definition Status Definition Custody Vessels owned/sponsored by Army Vessel sponsor is the Army. other government programs Navy Vessel sponsor is the Navy. or agencies that are being NOAA Vessel sponsor is NOAA. maintained by MARAD in a USCG Vessel sponsor is the Coast Guard. fleet anchorage but not part Title XI Vessel sponsor is the MARAD Title XI program. of the NDRF. RRF RRF vessel not owned by MARAD Non-retention MARAD vessels that no Donation Hold Vessel reserved for donation to a qualified memorial or non-profit or humanitarian organization. longer have a useful Historic Review Vessel under NHPA Section 106 review for National Register eligibility. application and are pending Stripping Being stripped of useful material prior to becoming available for disposal. disposition. Disposal Vessel available for disposal or in the process of being disposed Sold Awaiting Removal Vessel sold for disposal and awaiting removal from fleet site Retention MARAD vessels that are Emergency Sealift Vessel reserverd for sealift support for emergent requirements being preserved for federal Fleet Support Vessel reserved for Reserve Fleet organzation use (e.g., for material storage purposes).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Vessel Safety Standards
    RESEARCH VESSEL SAFETY STANDARDS March 2009 UNOLS RVSS – Ninth Edition – March 2009 UNOLS Office University of Rhode Island – Graduate School of Oceanography 15 South Ferry Road Narragansett, RI 02882 This edition of the Research Vessel Safety Standards is dedicated to Captain Jim Williams of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, in appreciation for all of his work with the RVOC, UNOLS and in particular for his work on these standards for the academic research fleet. This edition is also dedicated to Bill Martin of the University of Washington who served as the Chair of RVTEC and as a key member of the Safety Committee, bringing the voice of sea-going marine technicians fully into the process of keeping these Safety Standards current and relevant to the UNOLS Community. The UNOLS Office and the UNOLS Research Vessel Safety Committee would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Geological Survey, and Minerals Management Service for support of this project. RVSS Edition 9 – 03/12/2009 PREFACE UNOLS Member Institutions first adopted the Research Vessel Safety Standards (RVSS) in May 1976. Later editions were adopted by members at UNOLS meetings in May 1981, May 1985, October 1989, September 1992, October 1995, July 1999 and March 2003. The UNOLS Council adopted this ninth edition in March 2009. In lieu of published institutional policy, these safety standards are considered the guidelines for UNOLS Research Vessels. For that reason, all UNOLS Members, both Operators and others, should be thoroughly familiar with the contents of this manual and comply with its recommendations as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • BLÜCHER Marine References
    BLÜCHER Marine References Country Project Shipyard Owner Vessel Type Hull no. Year Argentina Frigate Naval Shipyard Frigate Frigate Refitting 2005 Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 361 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 362 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 363 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 364 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 365 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 366 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 367 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 368 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Defence Civmec/ASC Australian Defence OPV OPV1 2019 Australia Australian Defence - ASC Shipyard Australian Defence Air Warfare Destroyer 2012 AWD Australia Australian Defence - LHD BAE Systems Australian Defence Landing Helicpoter 2012 Dock Australia Dick Smith Tenix Dick Smith Ocean Research Ulysses Blue 2005 Vessel Australia Esso West Tuna Esso Platform 1996 Australia HMAS Arunta BAE Systems Australian Defence ANZAC Frigate ANZAC 2019 Australia Jean de la Valette - Virtu Austal Ships Virtu Ferries High Speed Ferry 248 2010 Ferries Australia RNZN Tenix RNZN Ocean Research 42826 2006 Vessel Australia Taylor Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean of Solutions to Tackle Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss
    to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss ocean-climate.org Production: Marine Lecerf The Ocean & Coordination: Loreley Picourt and Anaïs Deprez Graphic design: Natacha Bigan Climate Platform, COVER PHOTOS: who are we? © Cyrille Barnérias © F. Larrey / Conservatoire du littoral The Ocean & Climate Platform is an international network of more than 90 © Daniel Uribe organisations from civil society - including NGOs, research institutes, foundations, © Franck GAZZOLA / UNDER THE POLE / ZEPPELIN NETWORK local authorities, international organisations and private sector entities - united around a key message: “a healthy ocean for a protected climate”. © Jean Jalbert – Tour du Valat © M.Dagnino / Institut Océanographique The Platform aims to promote scientific expertise and advocate for a better © Maxime HORLAVILLE / UNDER THE POLE recognition of ocean-climate-biodiversity issues by national and international © Nausicaá decision-makers. At the science-policy interface, the Platform supports policymakers in need of scientific information and guidance in the implementation of © Planète Mer - L. Debas public policies. © wpd In addition, the Platform provides a forum for exchange BACK COVER PHOTOS: and reflection: where stakeholders can build a common and holistic approach to the challenge of protecting © Alexis Rosenfield marine ecosystems and tackling climate change. © Sarah Lelong Drawing on its members’ expertise, the © Institut oceanographique/Michel Dagnino Platform brings light to concrete © Shom / Yannick Lenouvel solutions, based on the latest available science, to ©Jifmar Offshore Services preserve the ocean, its © The Sea People biodiversity and © Institut oceanographique/Michel Dagnino the climate. © The Sea People © IPEV - Cyril Gallut © Coral Guardian / Coco Tamlyn RECOMMENDED CITATION: OCEAN AND CLIMATE (2021), Ocean of Solutions to tackle climate 3 change and biodiversity loss, Ocean & Climate Platform, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Underway Oceanic and Atmospheric Measurements from Ships
    AUTOMATED UNDERWAY OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENTS FROM SHIPS Shawn R. Smith (1), Mark A. Bourassa (1), E. Frank Bradley (2), Catherine Cosca (3), Christopher W. Fairall (4), Gustavo J. Goni (5), John T. Gunn (6), Maria Hood (7), Darren L. Jackson (8), Elizabeth C. Kent (9), Gary Lagerloef (6), Philip McGillivary (10), Loic Petit de la Villéon (11), Rachel T. Pinker (12), Eric Schulz (13), Janet Sprintall (14), Detlef Stammer (15), Alain Weill (16), Gary A. Wick (17), Margaret J. Yelland (9) (1) Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, USA, Emails: [email protected], [email protected] (2) CSIRO Land and Water, PO Box 1666, Canberra, ACT 2601, AUSTRALIA, Email: [email protected] (3) NOAA/PMEL, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, USA, Email: [email protected] (4) NOAA/ESRL/PSD, R/PSD3, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328, USA, Email: [email protected] (5) USDC/NOAA/AOML/PHOD, 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA, Email: [email protected] (6) Earth and Space Research, 2101 Fourth Ave., Suite 1310, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA, Emails: [email protected], [email protected] (7) Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission UNESCO, 1, rue Miollis, 75732 Paris Cedex 15, FRANCE, Email: [email protected] (8) Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, NOAA/ESRL/PSD, 325 Broadway, R/PSD2, Boulder, CO 80305, USA, Email: [email protected] (9) National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK, Emails: [email protected],
    [Show full text]
  • SOSF 2020 Annual Report
    SAVE OUR SEAS FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 2020 SAVE OUR SEAS FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 2020 “AS LONG AS THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CARE AND TAKE ACTION, WE CAN AND WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE.” THE FOUNDER | SAVE OUR SEAS FOUNDATION An oceanic manta ray in the Revil- lagigedo Archipelago National Park, Mexico. CONTENTS 02 FOUNDER’S STATEMENT 07 CEO’S FOREWORD 12 17 YEARS OF THE SAVE OUR SEAS FOUNDATION 14 WHERE WE WORK 16 OUR CENTRES 18 D’Arros Research Centre 24 Shark Education Centre 36 Shark Research Center 46 OUR PARTNERS 48 Bimini Biological Field Station Foundation 58 The Manta Trust 68 Shark Spotters 78 The North Coast Cetacean Society 88 The Acoustic Tracking Array Platform 98 PROJECT LEADERS 100 Small grant projects 110 Keystone projects | Continuation 118 Keystone projects | New 122 COMMUNICATION PROJECTS 132 OUR TEAM 140 FUNDING SUMMARY 140 Centres, partners and sponsorships 141 Index A: all projects funded in 2020 in alphabetical order 142 Index B: all projects funded in 2020 by type 144 Credits A group of whitetip reef sharks resting together on a ledge. CEO’S FOREWORD This year has not been the one any of us expected. As I write to reflect on 2020 amidst another lockdown, it is very hard to imagine a time before the current pandemic brought the world to a standstill. It has been a difficult period, with unparalleled loss for many. But there is hope. Vaccines are rolling out and we continue to adapt. Humanity is resourceful, and it has been humbling to witness the tremendous goodwill and sense of community as people work together to make this better.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine for Users of Kongsberg Products and Services The
    FEATURE STORY: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER SHIPPING OFFSHORE OPERATIONS FISHING AND ENVIRONMENT TRAINING AND INNOVATION THE MAGAZINE FOR USERS OF KONGSBERG PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THE MAGAZINE EDITORIAL Gunvor Hatling Midtbø Kongsberg Maritime Vice President – Communication The power of innovation – providing the full picture In this issue of the Full Picture we meet global leaders Teekay, Maersk and Heerema demonstrate that invest- who see opportunities where other see challenges – pio- ing in tomorrow’s training technology delivers powerful neering new ways of operating to access insight, perfor- benefits today. For readers looking for truly revolution- mance and competitive advantage. ary ideas, seek out Ocean Farming and KONGSBERG’S From the scientists at CERN in Geneva, aiming to re- MBR, while those eager to get ‘a view from the top’ can define our understanding of the very universe, to ship- connect with leading shipowner association CEOs. All owners such as UASC, Wilh. Wilhelmsen and BW, uti- this and much more awaits. lising the latest maritime technology to gaze into the This magazine aims to give you the full picture of our future and build flexible, efficient and environmentally dynamic ocean industries. Take a look from the perspec- friendly vessels for the next 20 to 30 years. Our featured tive of the exciting companies featured here to unlock a offshore industry players such as Allseas and Lundin are whole new world of understanding. ripping up the rulebook to blaze their own trails, while the full picture magazine 01 · 2016 1 THE FULL PICTURE MAGAZINE 01 · 2016 C 03 The Full PicTure 0 ONTENT 04 The Full PicTure Ocean Industries 06 ShiPPing 08 Size maTTerS UASC 12 SuPer heroeS Wilh.
    [Show full text]
  • Guarding the Deep a Brief History of the Marine Region
    1870-2020 elebration sesquicentennialc continues Guarding the Deep A Brief History of the Marine Region Story by Carrie Wilson Photographs provided by Marine Region 20 JULY—AUGUST 20202020 OUTDOOROUTDOOR CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA 21 1870-2020 variety and variability of marine life that Tthrives alonghe California’s Pacific Coast has embedded both scientist and storyteller alike with a deep appreciation for the sea—while at the same time providing them a cache of its secrets. For more than 150 years, ocean- faring businesses grew wherever access could be forged to the sea, and great industries ex- panded to fish the ocean’s plentiful resources. The world knows of these times through the literary tales published about the men and women who stood out. Readers became fascinated with the California fishing industry through the literary works of writers like John Steinbeck. It was Steinbeck’s 1945 classic, Cannery Row, that offered passionate accounts of California’s fisheries and marine wonders—dedicated to the marine biologist, Ed Ricketts, who inspired one of its characters—that capti- vated a nation. The libraries of such saltwater stories are a testament to the fascination shown to the unique ocean life found along the Golden State’s coastline. It was in this spirit that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife established the Marine Region. The Ma- rine Region manages the marine ecosystems and fisheries found along California’s entire coastline. Over the decades, the Marine Region has played a major role in the efforts to ensure sustainable ocean resources through ever-evolving scientific research. The mission of the Marine Region re- 1920s, fishermen used a technique called purse-seining, in mains simple and powerful: To protect, maintain, enhance which they would wrap an entire school of fish in a long net and restore California’s marine ecosystems for their eco- and then pull a line on the bottom to entrap the fish as they logical values and their use and enjoyment by the public pulled the net onto the deck for processing.
    [Show full text]