DOCSLIB.ORG

EMB PP25 Research Vessels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EMB PP25 Research Vessels EUROPEAN Next generation Position Paper 25 MARINE BOARD European Research Vessels Next generation European Research Vessels Current status and Foreseeable Evolution Cover Photo: View from the L'Atalante afterdeck while the ship is maneuvering. The L'Atalante is a research vessel of the French oceanographic fleet operated by Ifremer. This operation named Cassiopée, took place in the Pacific Ocean in 2015. Credit: © Ifremer/Ird - N. Lamande European Marine Board IVZW Belgian Enterprise Number: 0650.608.890 Wandelaarkaai 7 I 8400 Ostend I Belgium Tel.: +32(0)59 34 01 63 I Fax: +32(0)59 34 01 65 E-mail: [email protected] www.marineboard.eu EMB_PP25_Research_Vessels_cover_11mm.indd 1-3 17/10/19 21:51 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS European Marine Board The European Marine Board provides a pan-European platform for its member organizations to develop common priorities, to advance marine research, and to bridge the gap between science and policy in order to meet future marine science challenges and opportunities. The European Marine Board was established in 1995 to facilitate enhanced cooperation between European marine science organizations towards the development of a common vision on the strategic research priorities for marine science in Europe. Members are either major national marine or oceanographic institutes, research funding agencies, or national consortia of universities with a strong marine research focus. In 2019, the European Marine Board represents 33 Member Organizations from 18 countries. The Board provides the essential components for transferring knowledge for leadership in marine research in Europe. Adopting a strategic role, the European Marine Board serves its member organizations by providing a forum within which marine research policy advice to national agencies and to the European Commission is developed, with the objective of promoting the establishment of the European Research Area. www.marineboard.eu European Marine Board Member Organizations UNIVERSITÉS MARINES Irish Marine Universities Consortium National Research Council of Italy MASTS 2 POSITION PAPER 25 Next Generation European Research Vessels Current Status and Foreseeable Evolution European Marine Board IVZW Position Paper 25 This Position Paper is a result of the work of the European Marine Board Expert Working Group on Next Generation European Research Vessels (WG Research Vessels, see Annex 1), co-organized with the European Research Vessel Operators (ERVO – see Box 1.1 for more information). Coordinating Authors, and WG Chair and Co-Chair Per Nieuwejaar and Valérie Mazauric Contributing Authors Christian Betzler, Mafalda Carapuço, André Cattrijsse, Franco Coren, Juanjo Danobeitia, Colin Day, Aodhan Fitzgerald, Stefan Florescu, Jose Ignacio Diaz, Michael Klages, Erica Koning, Olivier Lefort, Giuseppe Magnifico, Øystein Mikelborg, Lieven Naudts Additional Contribution Riccardo Codiglia, Michele Rebesco, Andrea Caburlotto, Luc van Hoof, Lorenza Evangelista, Jan Opderbecke Series Editor Sheila JJ Heymans Publication Editors Paula Kellett, Cláudia Viegas, Britt Alexander, Joke Coopman, Ángel Muñiz Piniella External Reviewers Glenn Nolan, Geraint West, Bruce Appelgate, Rob Christie Internal Review Process The content of this document has been subject to internal review, editorial support and approval by the European Marine Board Member Organizations, the membership of the European Research Vessel Operators (ERVO) and the Ocean Facilities Exchange Group (OFEG). Suggested reference Nieuwejaar, P., Mazauric, V., Betzler, C., Carapuço, M., Cattrijsse, A., Coren, F., Danobeitia, J., Day, C., Fitzgerald, A., Florescu, S., Ignacio Diaz, J., Klages, M., Koning, E., Lefort, O., Magnifico, G., Mikelborg, Ø., Naudts, L. (2019) Next Generation European Research Vessels: Current Status and Foreseeable Evolution. Heymans, JJ., Kellett, P., Viegas, C., Alexander, B., Coopman, J., Muñiz Piniella, Á. [Eds.] Position Paper 25 of the European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium. 140pp. ISBN: 978-94-92043-79-5 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3477893 www.marineboard.eu [email protected] Design Zoeck October 2019 Disclaimer: To our knowledge, all photos presented in this publication have appropriate permission and credits. If you find an error, please inform the EMB Secretariat. 3 NEXT GENERATION EUROPEAN RESEARCH VESSELS Foreword Many of the global challenges facing the world today – climate change, food and water security, health and well-being, and economic development – are driving the ever-greater need for science to help understand and ultimately address these challenges. The natural, and in particular the marine sciences, have a significant role to play, and the research vessel fleet is called upon to deliver data and support globally important scientific research. Science has used ships as instruments for research since at least the 1700s, and the evolution of usage from instrument to laboratory can be traced through history. Today’s research vessels have been shaped to become complete research support platforms by the demand for scientific knowledge, fast-paced technological development and the increasing need for new ocean observations. Given the context in which Europe’s research vessel fleet is now operating, and the rapid developments in technology such as smart sensors and autonomy seen in recent years, it was timely to review the current status of the fleet and its ability to deliver the data that is needed. It is more than 10 years since the first EMB Position Paper on research vessels was published, and a lot has changed in that time. In particular, new research frontiers have arisen, especially in the deep sea and Polar regions, placing a new set of demands on the capabilities of vessels. This Position Paper provides a review of the current European research vessel fleet, its capabilities and equipment, assessing its ability to support science across the globe now and into the future. It also takes a wider vision, assessing the importance of these vessels in the ocean and earth observing landscape. This review includes not only technological but also human capabilities, looking at training needs for crew and technicians to ensure they can continue to deliver on critical science needs. It also considers the ways in which the current European fleet is managed. This Position Paper sets out recommendations for how the fleet will need to develop in the future to ensure that it will continue to provide the same high level of support to science globally, as well as highlighting ways in which management could be made more efficient. It is aimed at national- and European-level policy makers and funders, as well as the marine science community and the research vessel operator community. On behalf of the EMB membership, I would like to sincerely thank the members of the EMB Research Vessels expert working group (Annex 1) for their enthusiasm and drive in producing this publication. I would particularly like to thank working group Chair Per Nieuwejaar and co-Chair Valérie Mazauric for their dedication to delivering this excellent document, as well as the chapter leaders Lieven Naudts, Olivier Lefort, André Cattrijsse, Erica Koning and Giuseppe Magnifico. I would also like to thank ERVO for proposing to revisit this topic and for their collaboration in producing this document. Finally, I note with thanks the efforts of the EMB Secretariat in ensuring that this publication was delivered successfully, in particular Paula Kellett, Sheila JJ Heymans and Cláudia Viegas. I hope that this publication will help carry the European research vessel fleet into a new and exciting era of exploration, which will inspire interest in science across wider society. Gilles Lericolais Chair, European Marine Board IVZW October 2019 4 POSITION PAPER 25 Table of Contents Foreword 4 Executive Summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. Research vessels as a platform and interface for ocean technology 12 2.1 Current status and foreseeable evolution of the European research vessel fleet 14 2.2 A wide range of portable and exchangeable associated instruments 27 2.3 Current status of the European research vessel fleet capabilities 31 3. Deep sea 52 3.1 The deep-sea in the context of research vessels 54 3.2 Concept of deep-sea research vessels 54 3.3 Working examples of today’s deep-sea cruise activities 56 3.4 Current capabilities of the European deep-sea research fleet and trends for its evolution 59 4. Polar regions 64 4.1 Current capabilities of Polar research vessels 66 4.2 Operational and scientific requirements for Polar research vessels 74 4.3 Towards strengthened and enhanced collaboration, access and interoperability 77 4.4 Future trends 78 5. Towards an end-to-end European Ocean Observing System (EOOS): A research vessel perspective 80 5.1 Where do research vessels sit in the EOOS landscape? 82 5.2 Engaging with the EOOS process 84 6. Training the next generation of professionals 88 6.1 Sea-going research in the 21st century: changing science and personnel skill requirements 90 6.2 Landscape of training initiatives 90 6.3 Survey set-up and results 92 6.4 Interpretation of survey results 93 7. Management processes in the countries and partnerships developed in Europe 96 7.1 Current status of research vessel management processes 98 7.2 Collaborations and partnerships at European level 102 8. Looking ahead 106 References 108 Glossary 110 List of Abbreviations 115 Annex 1 Members of the European Marine Board Working Group on Next Generation Research Vessels (WG Research Vessels) 118 Annex 2 Additional contributing authors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cloud and Precipitation Properties from Ground-Based Remote-Sensing Instruments in East Antarctica
    The Cryosphere, 9, 285–304, 2015 www.the-cryosphere.net/9/285/2015/ doi:10.5194/tc-9-285-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Cloud and precipitation properties from ground-based remote-sensing instruments in East Antarctica I. V. Gorodetskaya1, S. Kneifel2,3, M. Maahn2, K. Van Tricht1, W. Thiery1, J. H. Schween2, A. Mangold4, S. Crewell2, and N. P. M. Van Lipzig1 1Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium 2Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany 3Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada 4Observations Department, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Uccle, Belgium Correspondence to: I. V. Gorodetskaya ([email protected]) Received: 6 June 2014 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 28 July 2014 Revised: 23 December 2014 – Accepted: 5 January 2015 – Published: 11 February 2015 Abstract. A new comprehensive cloud–precipitation– Large accumulation events (> 10 mm w.e. day−1) during the meteorological observatory has been established at Princess radar-measurement period of 26 months were always associ- Elisabeth base, located in the escarpment zone of Dronning ated with snowfall, but at the same time other snowfall events Maud Land (DML), East Antarctica. The observatory con- did not always lead to accumulation. The multiyear deploy- sists of a set of ground-based remote-sensing instruments ment of a precipitation radar in Antarctica allows for assess- (ceilometer, infrared pyrometer and vertically profiling pre- ing the contribution of the snowfall to the local SMB and cipitation radar) combined with automatic weather station comparing it to the other SMB components.
    [Show full text]
  • IRSO 2019 Agenda (Final V11)
    2019 IRSO 32nd Meeting Agenda - October 7-11, 2019 Host- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Hobart, Tasmania Meeting venue: Hotel Grand Chancellor, 1 Davey Street, Hobart Thursday 3rd October-2019 – Brisbane, Queensland, Optional Tour of RV Investigator – Ben Arthur (CSIRO) has emailed details to those of you who have indicated you will attend. Monday 7th October – Hobart Time Event Comments Topic - “From Paper to Platform” An overview of MFP Software 13:00 - 15:30 Workshop - Optional Workshop located at CSIRO, 3-4 Castray Esplanade Hobart A chance to catch up with other members 16:00 - 17:30 Pre-Registration & afternoon tea icebreaker Harbour View Mezzanine Level - Hotel Grand Chancellor Please be prompt 17:45 - 18:00 Bus departs Hotel Grand Chancellor Harbour View Mezzanine Level - Hotel Grand Chancellor Drinks and canapes provided 18:00 - 19:00 Welcome Reception – Government House Dress code - Suit or jacket and tie for men and smart dress/suit for women. 19:00 - 19:15 Bus returns to Hotel Grand Chancellor Free evening V11 Day1 IRSO Meeting –Tuesday 8th October-2019 Duration Time Theme Topic Owner Comments (Mins) 08:00 30 Registration Registration - Mezzanine Level – Grand Chancellor CSIRO 08:30 5 IRSO Day 1 - Welcome and admin matters Erica Koning/Greg Foothead 08:35 5 Welcome to Hobart - Introduction to hosts CSIRO - Toni Moate 08:40 15 Tasmanian Aboriginal Council Welcome to participants Toni Moate Opening of 32nd IRSO and 08:55 15 Round table introduction of participants All Business 09:10 5 Adoption
    [Show full text]
  • Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson Ship Specifications
    VESSELS SUPPORTING OCEAN EXPLORATION AND RESEARCH Research Vessel Thomas G. Thompson The R/V Thomas G. Thompson is owned by the U.S. Navy Office of Naval Research and is operated by the Ship Specifications School of Oceanography at the University of Washington. The Thompson measures 274 feet in Length: 273 ft (Global Class) length and draws 19 feet with a full load. Normal Draft: 17 ft cruising speed for the ship is 11 knots. Speed: 11 knots Range: 11,300 nm Endurance: 60 days Core Capabilities Berthing: 22 crew, 38 mission personnel The Thompson is equipped for multidisciplinary Commissioned: 1991 research projects involving large science parties. The Sonar Systems: 30 kHz Kongsberg EM 302 vessel can berth up to 36 scientific personnel, 21 multibeam sonar, 3.5 kHz Knudsen 3260 sub‐ officers and crew, and two marine technicians. bottom profiler, ADCP Laboratory space includes a large dry lab, wet lab, two Other Capabilities: Designed for interoperability bioanalytical labs, and a “hydro” lab. The hydro lab of projects, including full ocean depth CTDs, AUVs, is where scientists typically direct any ROV and AUV and deep ocean ROVs operations. The Thompson has three winches, three cranes, and an A‐Frame for launching scientific equipment. It is also equipped with an EM 302 multibeam sonar system, sub‐bottom profiler, ADCP system, and CTD/rosette. A number of ROV and AUV systems have been deployed from Thompson. OER Use Thompson is one of the primary vessels that OER has used to support major expeditions in remote regions of the Pacific Ocean. The vast majority of these expeditions were identified through the competitive peer review proposal process.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004
    Arctic Marine Transport Workshop 28-30 September 2004 Institute of the North • U.S. Arctic Research Commission • International Arctic Science Committee Arctic Ocean Marine Routes This map is a general portrayal of the major Arctic marine routes shown from the perspective of Bering Strait looking northward. The official Northern Sea Route encompasses all routes across the Russian Arctic coastal seas from Kara Gate (at the southern tip of Novaya Zemlya) to Bering Strait. The Northwest Passage is the name given to the marine routes between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans along the northern coast of North America that span the straits and sounds of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Three historic polar voyages in the Central Arctic Ocean are indicated: the first surface shop voyage to the North Pole by the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Arktika in August 1977; the tourist voyage of the Soviet nuclear icebreaker Sovetsky Soyuz across the Arctic Ocean in August 1991; and, the historic scientific (Arctic) transect by the polar icebreakers Polar Sea (U.S.) and Louis S. St-Laurent (Canada) during July and August 1994. Shown is the ice edge for 16 September 2004 (near the minimum extent of Arctic sea ice for 2004) as determined by satellite passive microwave sensors. Noted are ice-free coastal seas along the entire Russian Arctic and a large, ice-free area that extends 300 nautical miles north of the Alaskan coast. The ice edge is also shown to have retreated to a position north of Svalbard. The front cover shows the summer minimum extent of Arctic sea ice on 16 September 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 MTS Overview of Manned Underwater Vehicle Activity
    P A P E R 2007 MTS Overview of Manned Underwater Vehicle Activity AUTHOR ABSTRACT William Kohnen There are approximately 100 active manned submersibles in operation around the world; Chair, MTS Manned Underwater in this overview we refer to all non-military manned underwater vehicles that are used for Vehicles Committee scientific, research, tourism, and commercial diving applications, as well as personal leisure SEAmagine Hydrospace Corporation craft. The Marine Technology Society committee on Manned Underwater Vehicles (MUV) maintains the only comprehensive database of active submersibles operating around the world and endeavors to continually bring together the international community of manned Introduction submersible operators, manufacturers and industry professionals. The database is maintained he year 2007 did not herald a great through contact with manufacturers, operators and owners through the Manned Submersible number of new manned submersible de- program held yearly at the Underwater Intervention conference. Tployments, although the industry has expe- The most comprehensive and detailed overview of this industry is given during the UI rienced significant momentum. Submersi- conference, and this article cannot cover all developments within the allocated space; there- bles continue to find new applications in fore our focus is on a compendium of activity provided from the most dynamic submersible tourism, science and research, commercial builders, operators and research organizations that contribute to the industry and who share and recreational work; the biggest progress their latest information through the MTS committee. This article presents a short overview coming from the least likely source, namely of submersible activity in 2007, including new submersible construction, operation and the leisure markets.
    [Show full text]
  • National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory for the Month Ending
    U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory For the Month Ending January 31, 2020 Beginning of Month Vessel Count: 89 End of Month Vessel Count: 89 The National Defense Reserve Fleet Inventory is a monthly federal property accounting report for vessels under the ownership or custody of MARAD. The report further officially assigns vessels to an Accountable MARAD Division. Produced and Distributed by Division of Sealift Operations and Emergency Response (MAR-612) on February 11, 2020 02/11/2020 1/15 No Changes Recorded During Period Starting Date: January 01, 2020 Ending Date: January 31, 2020 Effective Date Remarks 02/11/2020 2/15 NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET INVENTORY MAR-612: RESERVE FLEET MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MONTHLY REPORT AS OF January 31, 2020 Glossary Program Definition Status Definition Custody Vessels owned/sponsored by Army Vessel sponsor is the Army. other government programs Navy Vessel sponsor is the Navy. or agencies that are being NOAA Vessel sponsor is NOAA. maintained by MARAD in a USCG Vessel sponsor is the Coast Guard. fleet anchorage but not part Title XI Vessel sponsor is the MARAD Title XI program. of the NDRF. RRF RRF vessel not owned by MARAD Non-retention MARAD vessels that no Donation Hold Vessel reserved for donation to a qualified memorial or non-profit or humanitarian organization. longer have a useful Historic Review Vessel under NHPA Section 106 review for National Register eligibility. application and are pending Stripping Being stripped of useful material prior to becoming available for disposal. disposition. Disposal Vessel available for disposal or in the process of being disposed Sold Awaiting Removal Vessel sold for disposal and awaiting removal from fleet site Retention MARAD vessels that are Emergency Sealift Vessel reserverd for sealift support for emergent requirements being preserved for federal Fleet Support Vessel reserved for Reserve Fleet organzation use (e.g., for material storage purposes).
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian Naval Architect
    THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 HMAS Adelaide preparing to embark United States Marine Corps amphibious assault vehicles during Exercise Rim of the Pacific 18 (RIMPAC 2018), Hawaii, in July. HMAS Adelaide unexpectedly took a lead role in the amphibious phase of RIMPAC when the US Navy assault ship planned for that role suffered mechanical problems and remained in Pearl Harbour for most of the exercise. HMAS Adelaide led HMA Ships Success, Melbourne and Toowoomba across the Pacific to take part in this major exercise which involved 25 nations, 46 surface ships, five submarines, 17 land forces, and more than 200 aircraft and 25 000 personnel. This major international exercise is held every two years (RAN photograph) THE AUSTRALIAN NAVAL ARCHITECT Journal of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects (Australian Division) Volume 22 Number 3 August 2018 Cover Photo: CONTENTS An impression of BAE Systems’ Global Com- 2 From the Division President bat Ship — Australia, selected as the preferred 3 Editorial design for Australia’s new frigates 4 Letter to the Editor (Image courtesy Department of Defence) 4 Coming Events The Australian Naval Architect is published four times per 5 News from the Sections year. All correspondence and advertising copy should be 15 Classification Society News sent to: The Editor 17 From the Crows Nest The Australian Naval Architect 18 General News c/o RINA PO Box No. 462 36 The Acquisition of a Multi-role Aviation Jamison Centre, ACT 2614 Training Vessel for the Royal Australian AUSTRALIA Navy — Alex Robbins email: [email protected] 39 Upgrade or Replace: A Cost Comparison The deadline for the next edition of The Australian Na- val Architect (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Alliance of European Research Fleets
    TOWARDS AN ALLIANCE OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH FLEETS Reporting Project Information EUROFLEETS Funded under FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES Grant agreement ID: 228344 Overall budget Status € 8 945 202,12 Closed project EU contribution Start date End date € 7 200 000 1 September 2009 31 August 2013 Coordinated by INSTITUT FRANCAIS DE RECHERCHE POUR L'EXPLOITATION DE LA MER France Final Report Summary - EUROFLEETS (TOWARDS AN ALLIANCE OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH FLEETS) Executive Summary: The quality of the infrastructures available for marine research contributes to Europe research performance. Marine research infrastructures are so considered as key elements of the European Strategy for Marine Research. A coherent pan-European approach with enhanced partnership in investment, development and usage of research fleets is necessary to better meet the diverse needs of European marine research. From its launching in September 2009, the EUROFLEETS (full name: “Towards an alliance of European research fleets”) process aims at bringing together the European research fleets owners and operators to enhance their coordination and to promote the cost-effective use of their facilities. It supported research services for the sustainable management and the monitoring of the regional seas and the oceans, and organized a common access to modern and well equipped research vessels to European and international g q pp p scientists and industrialists on sole condition of scientific excellence, thereby contributing to the EU ambitious goals for maintaining the ocean biodiversity or understanding climate change. Funded by FP7 (GA n°228344), the EUROFLEETS project included 24 diverse beneficiaries from 16 countries: 14 EU member states including 4 “recent” ones, and 2 countries associated to EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Vessel Safety Standards
    RESEARCH VESSEL SAFETY STANDARDS March 2009 UNOLS RVSS – Ninth Edition – March 2009 UNOLS Office University of Rhode Island – Graduate School of Oceanography 15 South Ferry Road Narragansett, RI 02882 This edition of the Research Vessel Safety Standards is dedicated to Captain Jim Williams of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, in appreciation for all of his work with the RVOC, UNOLS and in particular for his work on these standards for the academic research fleet. This edition is also dedicated to Bill Martin of the University of Washington who served as the Chair of RVTEC and as a key member of the Safety Committee, bringing the voice of sea-going marine technicians fully into the process of keeping these Safety Standards current and relevant to the UNOLS Community. The UNOLS Office and the UNOLS Research Vessel Safety Committee would like to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Geological Survey, and Minerals Management Service for support of this project. RVSS Edition 9 – 03/12/2009 PREFACE UNOLS Member Institutions first adopted the Research Vessel Safety Standards (RVSS) in May 1976. Later editions were adopted by members at UNOLS meetings in May 1981, May 1985, October 1989, September 1992, October 1995, July 1999 and March 2003. The UNOLS Council adopted this ninth edition in March 2009. In lieu of published institutional policy, these safety standards are considered the guidelines for UNOLS Research Vessels. For that reason, all UNOLS Members, both Operators and others, should be thoroughly familiar with the contents of this manual and comply with its recommendations as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • BLÜCHER Marine References
    BLÜCHER Marine References Country Project Shipyard Owner Vessel Type Hull no. Year Argentina Frigate Naval Shipyard Frigate Frigate Refitting 2005 Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 361 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 362 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 363 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 364 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 365 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 366 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 367 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 368 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Defence Civmec/ASC Australian Defence OPV OPV1 2019 Australia Australian Defence - ASC Shipyard Australian Defence Air Warfare Destroyer 2012 AWD Australia Australian Defence - LHD BAE Systems Australian Defence Landing Helicpoter 2012 Dock Australia Dick Smith Tenix Dick Smith Ocean Research Ulysses Blue 2005 Vessel Australia Esso West Tuna Esso Platform 1996 Australia HMAS Arunta BAE Systems Australian Defence ANZAC Frigate ANZAC 2019 Australia Jean de la Valette - Virtu Austal Ships Virtu Ferries High Speed Ferry 248 2010 Ferries Australia RNZN Tenix RNZN Ocean Research 42826 2006 Vessel Australia Taylor Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean of Solutions to Tackle Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss
    to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss ocean-climate.org Production: Marine Lecerf The Ocean & Coordination: Loreley Picourt and Anaïs Deprez Graphic design: Natacha Bigan Climate Platform, COVER PHOTOS: who are we? © Cyrille Barnérias © F. Larrey / Conservatoire du littoral The Ocean & Climate Platform is an international network of more than 90 © Daniel Uribe organisations from civil society - including NGOs, research institutes, foundations, © Franck GAZZOLA / UNDER THE POLE / ZEPPELIN NETWORK local authorities, international organisations and private sector entities - united around a key message: “a healthy ocean for a protected climate”. © Jean Jalbert – Tour du Valat © M.Dagnino / Institut Océanographique The Platform aims to promote scientific expertise and advocate for a better © Maxime HORLAVILLE / UNDER THE POLE recognition of ocean-climate-biodiversity issues by national and international © Nausicaá decision-makers. At the science-policy interface, the Platform supports policymakers in need of scientific information and guidance in the implementation of © Planète Mer - L. Debas public policies. © wpd In addition, the Platform provides a forum for exchange BACK COVER PHOTOS: and reflection: where stakeholders can build a common and holistic approach to the challenge of protecting © Alexis Rosenfield marine ecosystems and tackling climate change. © Sarah Lelong Drawing on its members’ expertise, the © Institut oceanographique/Michel Dagnino Platform brings light to concrete © Shom / Yannick Lenouvel solutions, based on the latest available science, to ©Jifmar Offshore Services preserve the ocean, its © The Sea People biodiversity and © Institut oceanographique/Michel Dagnino the climate. © The Sea People © IPEV - Cyril Gallut © Coral Guardian / Coco Tamlyn RECOMMENDED CITATION: OCEAN AND CLIMATE (2021), Ocean of Solutions to tackle climate 3 change and biodiversity loss, Ocean & Climate Platform, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Distancing Italy Coronavirus Report What Is a Virus? Aurora Australis
    Episode 8 24th March 2020 Social Distancing 1. In your own words, explain what social distancing is. 2. How is it different to self-isolating? 3. Give some examples of social distancing. 4. What is the government doing to reduce the amount of contact people have with each other? 5. Why is social distancing important? 6. The idea with social distancing is it flattens the curve. What does that mean? 7. Schools that are still open are taking precautions to keep students safe. Give an example. 8. How can you stay connected to family and friends while social distancing? 9. Create a diagram or graphic that communicates the importance of social distancing. 10. How are you feeling about coronavirus? Share your thoughts with a friend or family member. Italy Coronavirus Report 1. Where in Italy do Maggie and Zach live? Locate using Google Maps. 2. Why did they move to Italy? 3. Northern Italy has had the most cases of coronavirus than anywhere else in Italy. True or False? 4. The whole of Italy is in lockdown. What does that mean? 5. Finish the following sentence: The government hopes that lockdown will… 6. What sorts of things did Maggie and Zach do before the lockdown? 7. What is life like for them since the lockdown? 8. What sorts of activities do Maggie and Zach do to pass the time? 9. How do they stay connected to their friends? 10. How do Maggie and Zach feel about the lockdown? What is a virus? 1. What did the BTN story explain? 2.
    [Show full text]