Latrine Pit Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

23 – Latrine pit design Developing knowledge and capacity GGUIDEUIDE 2233 About WEDC in water and sanitation The Water, Engineering and What makes us stand out from the Development Centre is one of the crowd is our outreach to practitioners. world’s leading education and research We use our knowledge base and our institutes for developing knowledge applied research work to develop and capacity in water and sanitation the capacity of individuals and Latrine pit design for sustainable development and organizations throughout the world, emergency relief. promoting the integration of social, technical, economic, institutional and We are committed to the provision This guide examines some of the factors that need to be taken into account environmental activities as foundations of effective, evidence-based and when planning and designing a latrine pit (or twin pits), including the for sustainable development. appropriate solutions for the location of a latrine, its shape, volume, liquid capacity and life. improvement of basic infrastructure Visit our website to find out more about and essential services for people living our postgraduate and professional in low- and middle-income countries. development programmes (MSc, Contents With over 45 years of experience, we Diplomas and postgraduate certificates Pit location......................................................1 offer expert advice and quality learning available at the University or by Key design features ......................................1 opportunities for sector professionals. distance learning); our research; our Distance from a water source ......................2 advisory services; our international Founded in 1971, WEDC is based in the conferences; and our extensive range Depth to water source ...................................2 School of Civil and Building Engineering of information resources which are Lateral separation .........................................2 at Loughborough University, one of the free to download from our knowledge top UK universities. Being a part of a Shape ..............................................................2 base. leading university gives us a recognised Volume ............................................................8 platform of independence and quality. http://wedc.lboro.ac.uk Liquid capacity ...............................................9 Pit life ..............................................................9 Associated reading: Latrine pit excavation and linings Water, Engineering and Development Centre School of Civil and Building Engineering Refer to other guides in this series for further information about the range of latrine Loughborough University types suitable for low-income communities. Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK T: + 44 (0) 1509 222885 Linkedin: WEDC UK E: [email protected] Twitter: wedcuk W: wedc.lboro.ac.uk YouTube: wedclboro wedc.lboro.ac.uk/knowledge 2 9 © WEDC, Loughborough University, 2014 Liquid capacity In urban areas, where pit emptying, is carried out it makes more sense to limit Author: Bob Reed Quality assurance: Rebecca Scott Pour-flush latrines and those that are also used for bathing or laundry can store pit depth to about 1.5 metres. People Edited and illustrated by Rod Shaw Technical illustrations: Ken Chatterton a significant amount of liquid. In dry pits usually prefer to have a small amount of the contents emptied more frequently, Designed and produced by WEDC Publications table this liquid will tend to accumulate on the surface of the pit sludge and than a large amount occasionally, as it is gradually rise until the surface of the pit a more affordable option. This guide is one of a series of published learning resources which are available for wall allows the liquid to infiltrate into the purchase in print or available to download free of charge from the WEDC Knowledge surrounding soil (Figure 7). Base. Any part of this publication, including the illustrations (except items taken from In impermeable soils, the use of pour- Why don’t we use the top half other publications where WEDC does not hold copyright) may be copied, reproduced flush latrines or allowing wastewater metre of a pit latrine? or adapted to meet local needs, without permission from the author/s or publisher, from bathing and laundry to enter the A pit is usually considered full when provided the parts reproduced are distributed free, or at cost and not for commercial pit quickly could fill the pit with liquid. the contents reach 0.5m from the pit ends and the source is fully acknowledged. Please send copies of any materials in This problem is seen most often in peri- slab. There are a number of reasons which text or illustrations have been used to WEDC at the address given below. urban areas where water consumption is for this. higher. The solution is to either: If the pit is to be replaced when it is Published by WEDC, Loughborough University • empty the solids out of the pit more full, then 0.5m of soil on top of the frequently so that there is more room wastes will make the area safe to ISBN 978 1 84380 173 3 for liquid storage; walk over so anyone treading over This is one of a series of WEDC guides on sanitation. For a comprehensive list of all • dig an overflow pit to take the excess the site will not sink in. published guides, please visit: http://wedc.lu/1mlHcnD liquid; It will also prevent domestic animals • find alternative disposal methods for Also available in French, translated by SOLIDARITÉS INTERNATIONAL from burrowing into the pit, looking the bathing or laundry liquids; or for food. • use another sanitation system The soil layer will prevent any fly designed to accommodate the larvae that may have been breeding additional liquid (such as a septic in the waste from escaping. tank with infiltration). Furthermore, the increased Pit life Water, Engineering and Development Centre incidence of problems with odour, The life of the pit is the time taken for it School of Civil and Building Engineering flies and splashing as the content to fill. Loughborough University reaches close to the top. The pit Leicestershire LE11 3TU UK In rural areas, single pits should usually contents will also be visible which be dug as deep as possible so that it may offend users and dissuade T: + 44 (0) 1509 222885 Linkedin: WEDC UK takes a long time for them to fill. A them from using the latrine. E: [email protected] Twitter: wedcuk minimum design life of ten years is W: wedc.lboro.ac.uk YouTube: wedclboro recommended. 8 1 Volume Pit location Wet pits or dry pits? The volume of a pit affects how long it A latrine is no use if users can’t reach it. This is particularly important if the latrine is a Pits that are partly below the water will take to fill and hence its life before long way from the house and/or if some of the users have difficulty walking. So access table and therefore permanently emptying or replacement. Estimating to the latrine is a major consideration in the location of the latrine which will in turn contain water are known as ‘wet how long that will be is not easy. The key impact on the design of the latrine pit. pits’. factors affecting the rate at which a pit fills are: Generally, micro-biological activity Key design features is greater in wet conditions than dry • the number of users; When planning and designing a latrine, ones. Also the solids can be more • the volume of fresh human waste make sure: efficiently compacted under water deposited into the pit; • to plan to build the latrine as close as (there will be fewer voids). • the volume of other wastes; and possible to the living area; It is also thought that the flow of • the access path is at least 120cm water through the pit carries more • the sludge accumulation rate. wide and built of materials that give a of the wastes into the surrounding In the absence of local knowledge smooth but non-slip finish; soil than happens in a dry pit. the figures given in Table 3 could be • slopes and steps are kept to a This is why the sludge accumulation used. These figures are long-term minimum and if essential slopes are rate for wet pits is much lower than accumulation rates. In shallow pits (such designed at less than 1 in 12; for dry ones. as are used for twin pit latrines) these rates will be too low. In this case, you • a hand rail next to the steps or a should increase the figures by 50%. slope is included; and • the path is designed to be easy to see at night. Assuming there is no possibility or concern as a result of polluting groundwater, the location of a pit for excreta disposal depends on the type of latrine used. Liquid Liquid percolation zone Fresh unconsolidated waste Consolidated waste Remember a latrine will last a family many years. All the users may be fit and active when the latrine is Figure 1. Consideration should be given built but this may not be the case in to all users, particularly those with years to come. Figure 6. Liquid percolation zone in a pit latrine mobility difficulties 2 7 1m 1m 1m Simple pit latrines should be built away Depth to water source 2m from the home to prevent nuisance from Table 1 suggests the minimum distance odour and flies. A distance of about 10 between the bottom of the pit and the 0.5m metres is usual but some users feel highest level of the groundwater table to 0.5m that the convenience of a nearby latrine ensure total removal of organic wastes. outweighs the inconvenience caused by If the pit meets this criteria then it can be 2.5m the odour and flies, so choose to locate located as little as 10m from the water 1m them closer to the home. source. Pour-flush latrines can be built very close to, or as part of a house, provided Lateral separation the house has good foundations to If the depth to the water table is less prevent subsidence and the pit lining is than that suggested in Table 1 then strong enough to withstand forces placed the groundwater will be contaminated and require further time to purify itself.
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Environmental Protection Using Modified Pit-Latrines

    Sustainable Environmental Protection Using Modified Pit-Latrines

    Sustainable Environmental Protection Using Modified Pit-Latrines Esnati James Chaggu Promotor: Prof. dr.ir. G. Lettinga Hoogleraar in de anaërobe zuiveringstechnologie en hergebruik van afvalstoffen Co-promotoren: Dr. W. T. M. Sanders Post-doc onderzoeker bij de sectie Milieutechnologie, Wageningen Universiteit, Nederland Prof. A. Mashauri Dar-es-Salaam Universiteit, Tanzania Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Prof. G. Spaargaren Wageningen Universiteit Prof. dr. H. J. Gijzen UNESCO-IHE, Delft, Nederland Dr. G. J. Medema KIWA Water Research, Nieuwegein, Nederland Prof. Dr. H. Folmer Wageningen Universiteit Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Wimek Sustainable Environmental Protection Using Modified Pit-Latrines Esnati James Chaggu Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. Dr. Ir. L. Speelman, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 23 maart 2003 des namiddags te half twee in de aula CIP-DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG. Chaggu, E. J. Sustainable Environmental Protection Using Modified Pit-Latrines ISBN: 90-5808-989-4 Subject headings: excreta disposal/blackwater/nightsoil/anaerobic digestion/improved pit latrines Abstract - Chaggu, E. J. (2004). Sustainable Environmental Protection Using Modified Pit-Latrines. Ph.D Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. Pit-latrines are on-site excreta disposal facilities widely used as anaerobic accumulation system for stabilizing human wastes like excreta, both in rural and urban settlements of developing countries. Flooding of pit-latrines is often a common phenomenon, especially in situations of high water table (HWT) conditions and during the rainy season, causing a health jeopardy to residents. The pits are not water-tight, the (ground)water can freely flow in and out of the pit, especially in HWT areas.
  • HEALTH ASPECTS of DRY SANITATION with WASTE REUSE Anne Peasey

    HEALTH ASPECTS of DRY SANITATION with WASTE REUSE Anne Peasey

    HEALTH ASPECTS OF DRY SANITATION WITH WASTE REUSE Anne Peasey Task No. 324 WELL STUDIES IN WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Health Aspects of Dry Sanitation with Waste Reuse Anne Peasey WELL Water and Environmental Health at London and Loughborough Health Aspects of Dry Sanitation with Waste Reuse ii London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Keppel Street London WC1E 7HT © LSHTM/WEDC Peasey, A. (2000) Health Aspects of Dry Sanitation with Waste Reuse WELL Designed and Produced at LSHTM Health Aspects of Dry Sanitation with Waste Reuse EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Dry sanitation is defined in this report as the on-site disposal of human urine and faeces without the use of water as a carrier. This definition includes many of the most popular options for low- cost sanitation including pit latrines, Ventilated Improved Pits, SanPlats, etc. There has always been an interest in the reuse of human waste as a fertiliser, and there has been much recent work on the development of composting and other processes to permit human waste reuse. This report examines the practice of dry sanitation with reuse in Mexico, with a particular focus on health issues and the lessons to be learned from case studies and experience. DRY SANITATION WITH REUSE There are two distinct technical approaches to dry sanitation with reuse; · Dehydration. Urine and faeces are managed separately. The deposited faecal matter may be dried by the addition of lime, ash, or earth, and the contents are simply isolated from human contact for a specified period of time to reduce the presence of pathogens. · Decomposition (composting) In this process, bacteria, worms, or other organisms are used to break organic matter down to produce compost.
  • UD & Composting Toilets (Ecosan)

    UD & Composting Toilets (Ecosan)

    UD Toilets and Composting Toilets in Emergency Settings This Technical Brief looks at the criteria for selecting Urine Diversion (UD) and Composting Toilets options in an emergency setting, including the construction, operation and maintenance of such units which is used to store and dry the faeces over a specified Ecological Sanitation or period. Normally, it is recommended to store faeces for a Sustainable Sanitation? minimum of 12-months in one vault before emptying. Adding a desiccating material such as ash or sawdust will The approach of Ecological Sanitation (Ecosan) in accelerate the faeces drying process. Typically, in a well- emergency settings breaks with conventional excreta managed ecosan unit, storage times of greater than 3- disposal options such as pit latrines or pour-flush toilets. months will reduce many pathogens to safe levels, in Traditionally, Ecosan systems re-use both faeces and particular those responsible for Ameobiasis, Giardiasis, urine, turning them into either a soil conditioner or a Hepatitis A, Hookworm, Whipworm, Threadworm, fertilizer. This not only benefits peoples’ health through Rotavirus, Cholera, Escherichia coli, and Typhoid safe excreta disposal and by reducing environmental amongst others. Ascaris is more persistent though, and contamination, but also implies re-using the by-products may require retention times of 12-months or more. for some form of agricultural activity. In an emergency setting, the choice of ecosan options is very often driven by factors other than the re-use of all or part of the by-products. Ecosan toilets are very often better suited to rocky ground or areas with high water tables, making them more resistant to cyclic flooding for instance.
  • Technology Review of Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets (Uddts) Overview of Design, Operation, Management and Costs

    Technology Review of Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets (Uddts) Overview of Design, Operation, Management and Costs

    Technology Review of Urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) Overview of design, operation, management and costs As a federally owned enterprise, we support the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany T +49 228 44 60-0 (Bonn) T +49 61 96 79-0 (Eschborn) Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 53113 Bonn, Germany T +49 228 44 60-0 F +49 228 44 60-17 66 Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5 65760 Eschborn, Germany T +49 61 96 79-0 F +49 61 96 79-11 15 E [email protected] I www.giz.de Name of sector project: SV Nachhaltige Sanitärversorgung / Sustainable Sanitation Program Authors: Christian Rieck (GIZ), Dr. Elisabeth von Münch (Ostella), Dr. Heike Hoffmann (AKUT Peru) Editor: Christian Rieck (GIZ) Acknowledgements: We thank all reviewers who have provided substantial inputs namely Chris Buckley, Paul Calvert, Chris Canaday, Linus Dagerskog, Madeleine Fogde, Robert Gensch, Florian Klingel, Elke Müllegger, Charles Niwagaba, Lukas Ulrich, Claudia Wendland and Martina Winker, Trevor Surridge and Anthony Guadagni. We also received useful feedback from David Crosweller, Antoine Delepière, Abdoulaye Fall, Teddy Gounden, Richard Holden, Kamara Innocent, Peter Morgan, Andrea Pain, James Raude, Elmer Sayre, Dorothee Spuhler, Kim Andersson and Moses Wakala. The SuSanA discussion forum was also a source of inspiration: http://forum.susana.org/forum/categories/34-urine-diversion-systems-
  • Sanitation Options

    Sanitation Options

    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 11.479J / 1.851J Water and Sanitation Infrastructure in Developing Countries Spring 2007 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. On-site Sanitation Brian Robinson and Susan Murcott Week 12 - MIT 11.479J / 1.851J Water and Sanitation Infrastructure in Developing Countries Mass. Institute of Technology May 8, 2007 On-site Sanitation • Sanitation ladder: options in sanitation • Ecological Sanitation • Case Study: Ecosan in Kenya Improved sanitation • connection to a public sewer • connection to septic system • pour-flush latrine • simple pit latrine • ventilated improved pit latrine The excreta disposal system is considered “adequate” if it is private or shared (but not public) and if it hygienically separates human excreta from human contact. "Not improved“ = service or bucket latrines (where excreta are manually removed), public latrines, latrines with an open pit. Sanitation “Ladder” Technology Hygiene 1. Open defecation, “flying toilet” 2. “Cathole” burial 3. Pit latrine 4. VIP 5. EcoSan 6. Pour-flush 7. Water-sealed toilets + neighborhood wastewater collection 8. Water-sealed toilets + neighborhood wastewater collection + treatment 1. No Poop sanitation *S. Murcott (T.P.) 2. “Cathole” burial Sanitation “Ladder” Technology Hygiene 1. Open defecation, “flying toilet” 2. “Cathole” burial 3. Pit latrine 4. VIP On-site sanitation 5. EcoSan 6. Pour-flush 7. Water-sealed toilets + neighborhood wastewater collection 8. Water-sealed toilets + neighborhood wastewater collection + treatment 3. Pit latrine – with pit Drainage? 3. Pit Latrine, No Pit 4. Ventilated Fly screen improved Air (ventilation) pit latrine (VIP) Vent pipe Seat cover A dry latrine system, with a screened vent pipe Pedestal to trap flies and often Pit collar Cover slab (May be extended to with double pits to base of pit in poor allow use on a ground conditions) permanent rotating basis.
  • 1.5 Design of Composting Toilet for Practical Application in Burkina Faso

    1.5 Design of Composting Toilet for Practical Application in Burkina Faso

    Design of composting toilet for practical application in Burkina Faso Kenta Yabui*, Ken Ushijima, Ryusei Ito, Naoyuki Funamizu Department of Environmental Engineering, Graduate school of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita-13, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan [email protected] 011-706-6272 Abstract Resource recycling sanitation system, which utilize composting toilet, is one of the promising concept to improve the sanitary conditions in developing countries. In this sanitation system, toilet has to have two functions; sanitary equipment and fertilizer generator. As sanitary equipment, toilet has to provide clean, safe, comfortable environment for daily defecation. As fertilizer generator, toilet has to convert urine and feces into safe and good quality of fertilizer. The composting toile should be designed in order to perform both two functions in high quality, with low cost. In this research, design requirements for toilet as sanitary equipment and fertilizer generator are abstracted basing on field survey to 6 families from 3 villages in rural area of Burkina Faso. According to abstracted requirements, one design of composting toilet was proposed for rural area of Burkina Faso. The feces degradation performance was same level as commercial composting toilet and required torque for mixing was smaller than commercial screw type composting toilet. Key words: user oriented design, resource recycling sanitation system, composting toilet 1. Introduction Currently, in Burkina Faso, people living in rural area can access to improved toilet are 6%. In Millennium developing Goals (MDGs), the target is the number of people do not have improved sanitary facilities reduces by half by 2015. In that area, the progress of installation of sanitary facilities to achieve MDGs is too low, while more than half of the people still have open defecation culture or unimproved toilets, especially poor people.
  • Investigation Into Methods of Pit Latrine Emptying April 2009

    Investigation Into Methods of Pit Latrine Emptying April 2009

    WRC PROJECT 1745 Management of sludge accumulation in VIP latrines Investigation into Methods of Pit Latrine Emptying April 2009 by Mark O’Riordan Mark O’Riordan Investigation of Methods of Pit Latrine Emptying Page - i Executive Summary Improving sanitation is now increasingly being recognized as a key factor in ending poverty; providing basic sanitation has been included in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) under target 10 of halving the proportion of people without access to adequate basic sanitation by 2015. In an attempt to reach this MDG target many developing countries have embarked on the construction of pit latrines and improved sanitation in people’s homes. An emerging challenge that is resulting from this work is what to do when the latrines are full. If they are to be emptied how should the waste be extracted, where should the waste go and what should be done to it and with it? The approaches to meeting this question are the focus of this report. The report aims to summarise all information currently available to PID resulting from; • General research • Durban’s pit latrine emptying programme • Work with the Vacutug on loan from UN Habitat • A visit to UN Habitat in Nairobi • Site visit to Vacutug facilitating charity Maji na Ufanisi working in Kibera, Nairobi • Design and development work on the ‘Gobbler’ The main part this report is a fairly high level introduction to the issue of faecal sludge management. Where details and information have been readily available the report goes into further depth. A large section of this report focuses on assessment of the United Nations Vacutug project in an attempt to build guidance for the development of a successful latrine exhausting system.
  • 1. Urine Diversion

    1. Urine Diversion

    1. Urine diversion – hygienic risks and microbial guidelines for reuse © Caroline Schönning Department of Parasitology, Mycology and Environmental Microbiology Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI) SE-171 82 Solna Sweden [email protected] This chapter is based on the doctoral thesis published by the author in February 2001: Höglund, C. (2001). Evaluation of microbial health risks associated with the reuse of source separated human urine. PhD thesis, Department of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. ISBN 91-7283-039-5. The full thesis (87 pages, without published papers) can be downloaded from: http://www.lib.kth.se/Sammanfattningar/hoglund010223.pdf Dr Håkan Jönsson, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences is acknowledged for compiling Section 3, and Dr Jan-Olof Drangert, Linköping University is acknowledged for compiling Section 9. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 History 2 1.2 Nutrient content and volume of domestic wastewater 3 2. URINE DIVERSION 3 2.1 Urine diversion in Sweden 4 2.2 Source-separation of urine in other parts of the world 6 2.3 Ecological Sanitation 6 3. URINE AS A FERTILISER IN AGRICULTURE 7 3.1 Characteristics of diverted human urine 7 3.2 Collection and storage of the urine – developing countries 7 3.3 Urine as a fertiliser 8 3.4 Crops to fertilise 9 3.5 Dosage 9 3.6 Fertilising experiments 10 3.7 Acceptance 11 4. PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS IN URINE 11 5. FAECAL CONTAMINATION 13 5.1 Analysis of indicator bacteria to determine faecal contamination 14 5.2 Analysis of faecal sterols to determine faecal contamination 15 5.3 Discussion 16 6.
  • Assessing the Costs of On-Site Sanitation Facilities Study Report

    Assessing the Costs of On-Site Sanitation Facilities Study Report

    Eawag Überlandstrasse 133 P.O. Box 611 8600 Dübendorf Switzerland Phone +41 (0)44 823 55 11 Fax +41 (0)44 823 50 28 www.eawag.ch Assessing the Costs of on-Site Sanitation Facilities Study Report Lukas Ulrich, Prit Salian, Caroline Saul, Stefan Jüstrich & Christoph Lüthi March 2016 Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Assessing the Costs of on-Site Sanitation Facilities Contents 1. Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3.1. Comparing the cost of on-site sanitation facilities across countries ............................................ 6 3.1.1. Ensuring comparability ............................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2. Selection of technologies ......................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Cost items included in the country comparison ........................................................................... 7 3.3. Data collection and analysis ......................................................................................................... 8 3.3.1. Development
  • Doctor of Philosophy

    Doctor of Philosophy

    KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY KUMASI, GHANA Optimizing Vermitechnology for the Treatment of Blackwater: A Case of the Biofil Toilet Technology By OWUSU, Peter Antwi (BSc. Civil Eng., MSc. Water supply and Environmental Sanitation) A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2017 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work towards the PhD and that, to the best of my knowledge, it contains no material previously published by another person nor material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree of any university, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. OWUSU Peter Antwi ………………….. ……………. (PG 8372212) Signature Date Certified by: Dr. Richard Buamah …………………. .................... (Supervisor) Signature Date Dr. Helen M. K. Essandoh (Mrs) …………………. .................... (Supervisor) Signature Date Prof. Esi Awuah (Mrs) …………………. .................... (Supervisor) Signature Date Prof. Samuel Odai …………………. .................... (Head of Department) Signature Date i ABSTRACT Human excreta management in urban settings is becoming a serious public health burden. This thesis used a vermi-based treatment system; “Biofil Toilet Technology (BTT)” for the treatment of faecal matter. The BTT has an average household size of 0.65 cum; a granite porous filter composite for solid-liquid separation; coconut fibre as a bulking material and worms “Eudrilus eugeniae”
  • Accelerating the Reduction of Open Defecation in Rural India Begins by Admitting the Problem

    Accelerating the Reduction of Open Defecation in Rural India Begins by Admitting the Problem

    Accelerating the reduction of open defecation in rural India begins by admitting the problem Diane Coffey, r.i.c.e.1 note prepared for Kolkata Group meetings, February 4-7, 2015 Summary Why does rural India have uniquely high rates of open defecation? In rural India, 70% of households do not own a toilet or latrine. Indian rates of open defecation are uniquely high, much higher than in many poorer countries. This note asks why rural India has uniquely high rates of open defecation. It first explains that the “usual suspects” – GDP, poverty, education, water access – are not to blame for widespread open defecation in rural India. Second, it discusses how the sanitation technology used in rural India differs from the rest of the developing world – in short, very few rural Indian households use latrines with inexpensive underground soak pits. Third, it presents qualitative and quantitative evidence that Hindu practices of purity and pollution, as well as India’s unique history and renegotiation of untouchability, complicate the adoption of the kinds of simple, inexpensive latrines that have been used to reduce open defecation and improve health in rich countries before they were rich and in other developing countries. Finally, it ends with a brief comment on implications for Indian government policy. Although the evidence is overwhelmingly clear that the reduction of open defecation in rural India will not be importantly accelerated by the large investments in government latrines proposed by the Swachh Bharat Mission, it is unclear what kinds of interventions will help. It is almost certainly the case that accelerating the reduction of open defecation in rural India will require frank and uncomfortable conversations about what purity, pollution and the continuing practice of untouchability have to do with rural India’s open defecation crisis.
  • Household Sanitation

    Household Sanitation

    Technical brief Household sanitation Part of a series of Introduction WaterAid technology briefs. Open defecation in fields, bushes or beaches results in disease-causing pathogens being Available online at spread freely, and should be prevented. There www.wateraid.org/ are many designs of latrine, ranging from a technologies simple pit with a slab and superstructure, January 2013 to a double vault composting latrine producing high quality organic fertiliser, and any of these will effectively contain faecal pathogens (provided they are well used and maintained). Pit latrines have proven to be a popular choice with many people in various countries and are highly affordable; however it is important that people are given the opportunity to examine a variety of options and decide which they would prefer. Given sensitive guidelines and a little technical help, families can build latrines for themselves at very low cost. It should be noted that latrines are only one part of a sanitation system, particularly in urban areas. This technology note is concerned solely with on-site sanitation. For decentralised systems and collection and treatment of sludge please refer to the technology note ‘Wastewater treatment’. There are three main components in latrine design: • Pit • Slab • Superstructure Many variations of each component exist, which can be interchanged to design an optimum solution for a particular area. Technical brief Household sanitation Main components design, the slab should be shaped so that liquid drains towards the central Pit hole. Larger slabs should not be cast The pit for a family latrine should be over the pit, and should be preferably about 1.2m in diameter (this is the cast in two pieces (for easier smallest dimension that can be dug transport).