DOCSLIB.ORG

Rules for Policy Discussions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rules for Policy Discussions Rules for Policy Discussions Conservative Party of Canada 2013 Convention 1 On behalf of the entire Conservative Party and its membership, we would like to extend our sincere thanks to all of the hard-working members of the NPC. Chair of the NPC Menno Froese The Territories Edward Atkinson British Columbia Scott Lamb British Columbia Donald Leben Alberta Linda Lo Alberta Richard N. Billington Saskatchewan Wolfgang Langenbacher Manitoba Wayne Benson Ontario William (Bill) Lundy Ontario Jim Karahalios Ontario Philip O’Dell Ontario Lisa Lumley Quebec Axel Rioux Quebec Yannis Harrouche Quebec Jocelyn Allard Newfoundland and Labrador Morley Whitt New Brunswick Doug Williams Nova Scotia Robert Batherson Prince Edward Island Merlin Cormier The committee sought feedback from EDA’s on potential policy resolutions in a fair and open process. This began with the NPC interfacing with EDA’s and regional policy forums as part of an ongoing and open national policy process, at all times accountable to members of the Conservative Party of Canada. 274 policies were submitted of which 199 were unique. The Policy Committee was then tasked with ranking these submissions electronically based on the criteria outlined in the National Policy Committee Toolkit. The NPC then met face-to-face to debate and confirm the rankings as they are presented here. The final rankings were determined by a series of open votes held by the National Policy Committee. The policies have been sorted into 3 separate policy streams: 1-Canada’s Social Fabric 2-Role of Government, Taxation and Crime 3-Economic Development. While there is not sufficient time to debate the full 199 policy resolution submissions, the National Council has ensured that those resolutions which received the strongest support will be debated during the policy breakout sessions. 2 Rules for Policy Discussions A copy of the rules for Constitution and Policy Discussions has been posted to the Conservative Party of Canada website. A brief summary is provided below for ease of reference. Policy Break-Out Workshops Policy resolutions to be debated will be broken into three streams by subject matter Break-Out sessions will be moderated Only delegates may speak or vote Subject to the discretion of the moderator in light of time constraints, policy resolutions will be debated in the following manner: o 1 minute to introduce (sponsoring EDA) o 1 minute for caucus commentary if required o 1 additional speaker in favour (1 minute – order determined by moderator) o 2 speakers against (1 minute – order determined by moderator) o 30 seconds rebuttal (sponsoring EDA) The moderator will call a vote which shall be counted A maximum of ten (10) policy resolutions per break-out workshop which receive an affirmative vote by a majority of delegates voting in the break-out workshop will be listed on the agenda of Plenary. If more than (10) policy resolutions receive an affirmative vote by a majority of delegates voting in the break-out workshop, then priority shall be given to the policy resolutions that received 80% support and the balance sorted by the highest total absolute votes cast. Plenary If two or more delegates of the Plenary call for debate, the Chair will immediately call for a vote. Only where, in the Chair’s determination, the vote shows that a clear majority of delegates wish to have a debate, will a limited debate be permitted in the following manner: o 30 seconds to introduce 3 o 30 seconds for caucus commentary if required o 1 additional speaker in favour (30 seconds – order determined by moderator) o 2 speakers against (30 seconds – order determined by moderator) o 1 additional speaker – rebuttal by sponsoring EDA (30 seconds – order determined by moderator) Only delegates will be permitted to speak and vote As provided in the Constitution, a resolution amending either the Constitution or the Policy Declaration may only be amended by a majority of votes cast by delegates and a majority of votes cast by delegates from each of a majority of individual provinces. The territories together shall constitute one province. 4 POLICY AMENDMENT FORMAT - Modifications Policy Stream Resolution Number Language Canada’s Social Fabric – 1-01-046 – EN EDA – Crowfoot Sponsoring EDA(s) Section K – 66 - Social Policy (MODIFICATION) Section Nature of Change Amended: Current Policy Text Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris ni si ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non provident, sunt in culpa qui official deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Modified Text (Addition) Modified Text (Deletion) 5 POLICY AMENDMENT FORMAT - New Policy Stream Resolution Number Language Economic Development – 3-02-200 – EN EDA – Crowfoot Sponsoring EDA(s) Section V – Social Policy (NEW) Section Nature of Change Proposed Section Number Proposed Section Title 128. Devitantes Errata Resolution Text Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris ni si ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non provident, sunt in culpa qui official deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. 6 POLICY FLOOR RESOLUTIONS : CANADA’S SOCIAL FABRIC Conservative Party of Canada 2013 Convention 7 Canada’s Social Fabric – 1-01-134 - EN EDA – Essex Section J – Medical Isotopes (NEW) 63. Medical Isotopes The Conservative Party supports the Canadian production of medical isotopes. 8 Canada’s Social Fabric – 1-02-250 - EN EDA – Calgary Northeast Section T - 118 – Recognition of International Credentials (MODIFICATION) Amended: The Conservative Party believes in providing new immigrants and Canadians with foreign qualifications with the best possible opportunity to use their education and experience here in Canada. We see this as a matter of fairness to them newcomers and their families and a means of ensuring that Canada receives the full benefit of immigration foreign qualifications. i) We support working with the provinces to develop, in consultation with Canadian professional and trade associations, a process to evaluate standards in countries of origin in order to establish a workable system for assessing and recognizing credentials and experience; ii) We support working with the provinces to: a) ensure that equivalency exams are fair and that they accurately reflect the level of understanding expected of individuals educated in Canada; and b) to develop, in consultation with Canadian professional and trade associations, criteria for obtaining equivalent Canadian professional status, and transition and bridging programs for integration of foreign qualified individuals immigrants into the Canadian workplace; and c) work with recognized professional bodies to prequalify internationally trained individuals for certain occupations as part of the immigration process iii) We support requiring the credentials process to be disclosed to applicants by immigration staff overseas and on the Citizenship and Immigration Working in Canada website; iv) We support encouraging international students graduating from accredited Canadian colleges and universities to remain and work in Canada; and v) We support developing a better system to identify Canada’s occupations facing current labour market shortages needs and make the points immigration system more flexible to ensure these needs can be met. 9 Canada’s Social Fabric – 1-03-222 - EN EDA – New Brunswick Southwest Section R - 108 – Agricultural Principles (MODIFICATION) Amended: The Conservative Party views the agriculture industry to be a key strategic economic sector of Canada. We recognize that various regions of Canada and sectors of the industry hold competitive advantages in agricultural production. National agriculture policy development and ongoing support will continue to reflect our belief that one size does not fit all. Agriculture policy must be developed only in consultation with the agricultural producers. Our farmers today are business operators, and to dictate policy which might have an adverse effect on this business community would have negative consequences and go against Conservative Party principles. Balancing financial responsibility with support programs that actually work is a major priority of this party. i) Food. Food is one of the basic necessities of life, and we believe the government should place high priority on assuring that Canada’s food supply is safe, secure, and sustainable. We should seek to be among the world’s best when it comes to the safety of our food supply. We encourage measures to ensure accurate labelling of ingredients and country(ies) of origin, and more rigorous safety testing of imported food products. i) Food. Food is one of the basic necessities of life, and we believe the government must place high priority on assuring that Canada’s food supply is safe, secure, and sustainable. We must seek to be the world’s best when it comes to the safety of our food supply. We will encourage measures to require clear and accurate labeling of ingredients and country(ies) of origin, and more rigorous safety testing of imported food products. ii) Export and Diversification. To ensure that Canada has a secure supply of food, we support self-sufficiency in national food production, including increased diversification in the types of foods and agricultural products produced. We encourage government to seek to enhance export opportunities for all agricultural products with special emphasis on markets for processed and finished commodities. Through diversifying, the value added process and manufacturing will create new jobs within the respective communities and Canada. iii) Sustainability. If we are to ensure that Canada’s food supply is assured in the long term, agricultural production must be both economically and environmentally sustainable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mla Directory
    MLA DIRECTORY Airdrie Athabasca-Sturgeon-Redwater Banff-Cochrane Mrs. Angela Pitt (W) Mr. Colin Piquette (ND) Mr. Cameron Westhead (ND) Constituency Office Constituency Office Constituency Office 209 Bowers Street B-4705 49 Avenue 102, 721 Main Street Airdrie, AB T4B 0R6 Athabasca, AB T9S 0B5 PO Box 8650 Phone: 403.948.8741 Phone: 780.675.3232 Canmore, AB T1W 0B9 Toll-Free: 1.888.948.8741 Fax: 780.675.2396 Phone: 403.609.4509 Fax: 403.948.8744 Email:athabasca.sturgeon.redwater@assembl Toll-Free: 1.866.760.8281 Email: [email protected] y.ab.ca Fax: 403.609.4513 Email:[email protected] Barrhead-Morinville-Westlock Battle River-Wainwright Bonnyville-Cold Lake Mr. Glenn van Dijken (W) Mr. Wes Taylor (W) Mr. Scott Cyr (W) Mailing Address Constituency Office Constituency Office Box 4250 123 - 10 Street Box 5160 Barrhead, AB T7N 1A3 Wainwright, AB T9W 1N6 #2, 4428 - 50 Avenue Phone: 780.674.3225 Phone: 780.842.6177 Bonnyville, AB T9N 2G4 Fax: 780.674.6183 Fax: 780.842.3171 Phone: 780.826.5658 Email:barrhead.morinville.westlock@a Email:[email protected] Fax: 780.826.2165 ssembly.ab.ca Email:[email protected] Calgary-Acadia Calgary-Bow Calgary-Buffalo Hon. Brandy Payne (ND) Member Deborah Drever (ND) Hon. Kathleen Ganley (ND) Constituency Office Constituency Office Constituency Office #10, 8318 Fairmount Drive SE 6307 Bowness Rd NW #130, 1177 - 11 Avenue SW Calgary, AB T2H 0Y8 Calgary, AB T3B 0E4 Calgary, AB T2R 1K9 Phone: 403.640.1363 Phone: 403.216.5400 Phone: 403.244.7737 Fax: 403.592.8171 Fax: 403.216.5402 Fax: 403.541.9106 Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected] Email:[email protected] Calgary-Cross Calgary-Currie Calgary-East Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal Codes by Federal Ridings File 1996 Representation Order, Reference Guide
    Catalogue no. 92F0028GIE Postal Codes by Federal Ridings File 1996 Representation Order, Reference guide June 2003 Statistics Statistique Canada Canada ii How to obtain more information For information on the wide range of data available from Statistics Canada, you can contact us by calling one of our toll-free numbers. You can also contact us by e-mail or by visiting our Web site. National inquiries line 1 800 263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1 800 363-7629 Depository Services Program inquiries 1 800 700-1033 Fax line for Depository Services Program 1 800 889-9734 E-mail inquiries [email protected] Web site www.statcan.ca Ordering and subscription information This product, Catalogue no. 92F0028GIE, is available on Internet free. Users can obtain single issues at http:// www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/freepub.cgi. Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner and in the official language of their choice. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll free at 1 800 263-1136. Statistics Canada Postal Codes by Federal Ridings File 1996 Representation Order, Reference guide June 2003 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada Minister of Industry, 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission from Licence Services, Marketing Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Expenses Limits – Candidates
    37th General Election – November 27, 2000 Newfoundland and Labrador Code Electoral District Name Expenses Limit ($) 10-001 Bonavista--Trinity--Conception 66,424.90 10-002 Burin--St. George's 69,606.88 10-003 Gander--Grand Falls 70,897.97 10-004 Humber--St. Barbe--Baie Verte 68,394.07 10-005 Labrador 63,673.35 10-006 St. John's East 66,997.44 10-007 St. John's West 67,553.78 Prince Edward Island Code Electoral District Name Expenses Limit ($) 11-001 Cardigan 52,226.92 11-002 Egmont 52,303.09 11-003 Hillsborough 53,203.18 11-004 Malpeque 51,854.63 Nova Scotia Code Electoral District Name Expenses Limit ($) 12-001 Bras d'Or--Cape Breton 62,058.67 12-002 Cumberland--Colchester 64,309.62 12-003 Dartmouth 61,798.41 12-004 Halifax 62,475.33 12-005 Halifax West 66,783.26 12-006 Kings--Hants 65,995.81 12-007 Pictou--Antigonish--Guysborough 63,630.44 12-008 Sackville--Musquodoboit Valley--Eastern Shore 61,968.70 12-009 South Shore 63,356.54 12-010 Sydney--Victoria 61,100.34 12-011 West Nova 61,775.03 New Brunswick Code Electoral District Name Expenses Limit ($) 13-001 Acadie--Bathurst 63,208.83 13-002 Beauséjour--Petitcodiac 64,170.53 13-003 New Brunswick Southwest 60,815.19 13-004 Fredericton 60,574.68 13-005 Fundy--Royal 61,944.77 13-006 Madawaska--Restigouche 64,125.18 13-007 Miramichi 61,979.88 13-008 Moncton--Riverview--Dieppe 65,668.46 13-009 Saint John 60,017.28 13-010 Tobique--Mactaquac 62,302.26 Quebec Code Electoral District Name Expenses Limit ($) 24-001 Abitibi--Baie-James--Nunavik 78,614.41 24-002 Ahuntsic 70,441.24 24-003 Anjou--Rivière-des-Prairies
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Transportation Request for Qualifications
    ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN, BUILD, FINANCE, OPERATE OF SOUTHWEST CALGARY RING ROAD BEING THE SOUTHWEST LEG OF THE RING ROAD FOR THE CITY OF CALGARY, ALBERTA, CANADA July 8, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary of the Business Opportunity ............................................................ 1 1.2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Objectives of this RFQ ..................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Instructions to Interested Parties ...................................................................................... 3 1.5 Addenda to this RFQ ........................................................................................................ 4 1.6 Communications .............................................................................................................. 4 1.7 No Lobbying ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.8 Information Meeting ......................................................................................................... 5 1.9 Available Information ........................................................................................................ 5 1.10 No Liability.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Government (CMHC) Investments in Housing ‐ November 2015 to November 2018
    Federal Government (CMHC) Investments in Housing ‐ November 2015 to November 2018 # Province Federal Riding Funding* Subsidy** 1 Alberta Banff‐Airdrie$ 9,972,484.00 $ 2,445,696.00 2 Alberta Battle River‐Crowfoot $ 379,569.00 $ 7,643.00 3 Alberta Bow River $ 10,900,199.00 $ 4,049,270.00 4 Alberta Calgary Centre$ 47,293,104.00 $ 801,215.00 5 Alberta Calgary Confederation$ 2,853,025.00 $ 559,310.00 6 Alberta Calgary Forest Lawn$ 1,060,788.00 $ 3,100,964.00 7 Alberta Calgary Heritage$ 107,000.00 $ 702,919.00 8 Alberta Calgary Midnapore$ 168,000.00 $ 261,991.00 9 Alberta Calgary Nose Hill$ 404,700.00 $ 764,519.00 10 Alberta Calgary Rocky Ridge $ 258,000.00 $ 57,724.00 11 Alberta Calgary Shepard$ 857,932.00 $ 541,918.00 12 Alberta Calgary Signal Hill$ 1,490,355.00 $ 602,482.00 13 Alberta Calgary Skyview $ 202,000.00 $ 231,724.00 14 Alberta Edmonton Centre$ 948,133.00 $ 3,504,371.98 15 Alberta Edmonton Griesbach$ 9,160,315.00 $ 3,378,752.00 16 Alberta Edmonton Manning $ 548,723.00 $ 4,296,014.00 17 Alberta Edmonton Mill Woods $ 19,709,762.00 $ 1,033,302.00 18 Alberta Edmonton Riverbend$ 105,000.00 $ ‐ 19 Alberta Edmonton Strathcona$ 1,025,886.00 $ 1,110,745.00 20 Alberta Edmonton West$ 582,000.00 $ 1,068,463.00 21 Alberta Edmonton‐‐Wetaskiwin$ 6,502,933.00 $ 2,620.00 22 Alberta Foothills$ 19,361,952.00 $ 152,210.00 23 Alberta Fort McMurray‐‐Cold Lake $ 6,416,365.00 $ 7,857,709.00 24 Alberta Grande Prairie‐Mackenzie $ 1,683,643.00 $ 1,648,013.00 25 Alberta Lakeland$ 20,646,958.00 $ 3,040,248.00 26 Alberta Lethbridge$ 1,442,864.00 $ 8,019,066.00 27 Alberta Medicine Hat‐‐Cardston‐‐Warner $ 13,345,981.00 $ 4,423,088.00 28 Alberta Peace River‐‐Westlock $ 7,094,534.00 $ 6,358,849.52 29 Alberta Red Deer‐‐Lacombe$ 10,949,003.00 $ 4,183,893.00 30 Alberta Red Deer‐‐Mountain View $ 8,828,733.00 $ ‐ 31 Alberta Sherwood Park‐Fort Saskatchewan$ 14,298,902.00 $ 1,094,979.00 32 Alberta St.
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Office Budget and Support Provided by the House
    House of Commons INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS' EXPENDITURES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS FINANCIAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES SERVICES DIRECTORATE JUNE 2001 Introduction • The Speaker of the House of Commons, on behalf of the Board of Internal Economy (BOIE), tables the report on Individual Members' Expenditures on an annual basis pursuant to BOIE By-laws. Prior to tabling, Members receive a copy of their Individual Expenditures report. • Seats held by former Members are identified as "vacant" followed by the constituency name. Following the resignation or death of a Member, the Whip of the former Members' party maintains services to constituents until the date of a by-election. Prior to tabling, reports for vacant seats are sent to the Whip of the former Members' party. • Expenditures in the report reflect the fiscal year 2000-2001, covering both the 36th and 37th Parliaments. Information reflects the following three reporting periods: 8 months for Members of the 36th who did not return to the 37th Parliament (April 1, 2000 to November 26, 2000), 4 months for newly-elected Members to the 37th Parliament (November 27, 2000 to March 31, 2001), 12 months for Members re-elected to the 37th Parliament (April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001). • The Individual Members' Expenditures are presented in two main categories: Members' Office Budget and Support Provided by the House. All budgets and related expenses are for the fiscal year April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001, except for those who resigned during the fiscal year: Jim Hart (July 19, 2000) and Scott Brison (July 24, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Edmonton—Spruce Grove Alberta Conservative 6801-170Th Street (Main Office) Edmonton, Alberta T544W4 [email protected]
    Ambrose, Rona (Hon.) Edmonton—Spruce Grove Alberta Conservative 6801-170th Street (Main Office) Edmonton, Alberta T544W4 [email protected] Anders, Rob Calgary West Alberta Conservative 11 Spruce Centre SW Calgary, Alberta T3C 3B3 [email protected] [email protected] Benoit, Leon Vegreville—Wainwright Alberta Conservative 5004-49th Street, Professional Bldg, PO Box 300 Mannville, Alberta T0B 2W0 [email protected] Calkins, Blaine Wetaskiwin Alberta Conservative 5 - 4612 50th St, (Main Office) Ponoka, Alberta T4J 1S7 [email protected] Crockatt, Joan Calgary Centre Alberta Conservative 1333 8th Street SW, Suite 333 Calgary, Alberta T2R 1M6 [email protected] Dreeshen, Earl Red Deer Alberta Conservative 4315 55th Avenue, Suite 100A (Main Office) Red Deer, Alberta T4N 4N7 [email protected] Duncan, Linda Edmonton—Strathcona Alberta NDP 10049-81st Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T6E 1W7 [email protected] Goldring, Peter Edmonton East Alberta Independent Conservative 9111 - 118 Avenue NW, - Edmonton, Alberta T5B 0T9 [email protected] Harper, Stephen (Right Hon.) Calgary Southwest Alberta Conservative 1600 - 90th Avenue SW, Suite A-203 Calgary, Alberta T2V 5A8 [email protected] Hawn, Laurie (Hon.) Edmonton Centre Alberta Conservative 11156 142nd Street (Main Office) Edmonton, Alberta T5M 4G5 [email protected] Hillyer, Jim Lethbridge Alberta Conservative 255 - 8th Street South (Main Office) Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4Y1 [email protected] Jean, Brian Fort McMurray—Athabasca Alberta Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Government's Defeat of VIA Rail Bill
    TRANSPORT ACTION ONTARIO Advocating for Sustainable Public and Freight Transportation P.O. Box 6418, Station A, Toronto, ON M5W 1X3 www.transport-action.ontario.com FOR RELEASE APRIL 30, 2015 Government’s defeat of VIA Rail bill “misguided and destructive” TORONTO – The current government missed an opportunity to prove its support for an efficient and effective nationwide rail passenger service when it unanimously defeated MP Phil Toone’s Bill C-640, the VIA Rail Canada Act, yesterday. “This government’s veto of this progressive and necessary act to reform and revitalize our rail passenger service will prove to be misguided and destructive,” said Peter Miasek, president of the public transportation advocacy organization, Transport Action Ontario. “The most vital element in a rail passenger renaissance is an act that spells out VIA’s mandate, rights and obligations. This has been missing since VIA’s breech birth in 1977; MP Toone’s bill would have provided it.” The VIA Rail Canada Act was defeated on a vote of 152 to 122 in the House of Commons yesterday, with division on clear party lines. Every Conservative MP, plus former Conservatives James Lunney and Brent Rathgeber, who now sit as Independents, voted against it. Many of those MPs have in the past issued positive statements about their support for the maintenance, modernization and expansion of VIA. Support for the VIA Rail Canada Act came from all other members of the House of Commons who were present for the vote. That included unanimous consent by the NDP, Liberal and Green parties, Bloc Quebeçois and Forces et Démocratie, plus two Independents.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP and the Third Party Curse in Canada
    The NDP and the Third Party Curse in Canada by Maria Mavrikkou A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2009 © Maria Mavrikkou 2009 AUTHORS DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT This thesis evaluates the position of the NDP as Canada’s third party in federal electoral politics. It analyzes three external factors, the electoral system, the party finance system and the effects of voter behaviour and low voter turnout on the electoral success of the NDP. This work aims to discover why the NDP is seemingly caught in what this thesis refers to as a third party curse. Each of the three external factors which are susceptible to change are analyzed individually to discover whether they have a negative effect on the electoral success of the party. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all those who have influenced the writing of this thesis in one way or another, and all those who contributed to this long process somewhere along the way. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES vi CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………... 1 The Canadian Electoral System 5 The Canadian Finance System 8 Voter Behaviour and Voter Turnout in Canada 9 CHAPTER TWO: THE CANADIAN ELECTORAL SYSTEM ……………...………………………………………….…12
    [Show full text]
  • Bill C-377 Vote Results
    Bill C-377 Vote Results Name Constituency Province Party Vote Bellavance, André Richmond—Arthabaska Québec Bloc Québécois NO Fortin, Jean-François Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia Québec Bloc Québécois NO Mourani, Maria Ahuntsic Québec Bloc Québécois NO Plamondon, Louis Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour Québec Bloc Québécois NO Ablonczy, Diane (Hon.) Calgary—Nose Hill Alberta Conservative YES Adams, Eve Mississauga—Brampton South Ontario Conservative YES Adler, Mark York Centre Ontario Conservative YES Aglukkaq, Leona (Hon.) Nunavut Nunavut Conservative YES Albas, Dan Okanagan—Coquihalla British Columbia Conservative YES Albrecht, Harold Kitchener—Conestoga Ontario Conservative YES Alexander, Chris Ajax—Pickering Ontario Conservative YES Allen, Mike Tobique—Mactaquac New Brunswick Conservative NO Allison, Dean Niagara West—Glanbrook Ontario Conservative YES Ambler, Stella Mississauga South Ontario Conservative YES Ambrose, Rona (Hon.) Edmonton—Spruce Grove Alberta Conservative YES Anders, Rob Calgary West Alberta Conservative YES Anderson, David Cypress Hills—Grasslands Saskatchewan Conservative YES Armstrong, Scott Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley Nova Scotia Conservative YES Ashfield, Keith (Hon.) Fredericton New Brunswick Conservative A Aspin, Jay Nipissing—Timiskaming Ontario Conservative YES Baird, John (Hon.) Ottawa West—Nepean Ontario Conservative A Bateman, Joyce Winnipeg South Centre Manitoba Conservative YES Benoit, Leon Vegreville—Wainwright Alberta Conservative YES Bergen, Candice Portage—Lisgar Manitoba Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • 41St GENERAL ELECTION 41 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE
    www.elections.ca CANDIDATES ELECTED / CANDIDATS ÉLUS a Se n n A col ol R Lin inc ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED e L ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED C er d O T S M CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU C I bia C D um CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU É ol A O N C C t C A Aler 35050 Mississauga South / Mississauga-Sud Stella Ambler N E H !( A A N L T e 35051 Mississauga—Streetsville Brad Butt R S E 41st GENERAL ELECTION C I B 41 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR 35052 Nepean—Carleton Pierre Poilievre T I A Q S Phillip TERRE-NEUVE-ET-LABRADOR 35053 Newmarket—Aurora Lois Brown U H I s In May 2, 2011 E T L 2mai,2011 35054 Niagara Falls Hon. / L'hon. Rob Nicholson E - É 10001 Avalon Scott Andrews B E 35055 Niagara West—Glanbrook Dean Allison A 10002 Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor Scott Simms I N Niagara-Ouest—Glanbrook I Z E 10003 Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte Hon. / L'hon. Gerry Byrne L R N D 35056 Nickel Belt Claude Gravelle a E A n 10004 Labrador Peter Penashue N L se 35057 Nipissing—Timiskaming Jay Aspin N l n E e S A o d E 10005 Random—Burin—St. George's Judy Foote E D P n und ely F n Gre 35058 Northumberland—Quinte West Rick Norlock E e t a L s S i a R U h AXEL 10006 St. John's East / St.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing in the Margins: Collaboration Between Local Party Organizations in the Canadian Party System
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2016 Playing in the Margins: Collaboration Between Local Party Organizations in the Canadian Party System Currie-Wood, Robin Currie-Wood, R. (2016). Playing in the Margins: Collaboration Between Local Party Organizations in the Canadian Party System (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27370 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/3172 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Playing in the Margins: Collaboration Between Local Party Organizations in the Canadian Party System by Robin M. Currie-Wood A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ART GRADUATE PROGRAM IN POLITICAL SCIENCE CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2016 © Robin M. Currie-Wood 2016 ABSTRACT Collaboration between local party organizations is a peculiar organizational trait for Canadian political parties. It is peculiar because local party organizations were once conceived to be solely concerned with electoral activities in their own district, while central parties helped local campaigns in strategically important ridings. Collaboration also goes against the prevailing theory that political parties will centralize operations under new party finance law.
    [Show full text]