Chapter 5 Strategic Context and Project Need
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Patrick Port Botany Terminal, December 2017
Community Feedback Report Port Botany Terminal Patrick HSE Management System Operation Environmental Management Plan Courtesy of Bob Wood - Patrick Port Botany Terminal, December 2017 Report No. PBT_HSE_PLN_11_01_v02 Date Issued: 5 July 2019 CommunityPort Feedback Botany Report Terminal Operation Environmental Management Plan (OEMP) Community Feedback Report DOCUMENT CONTROL Document control shall be in accordance with Patrick’s corporate PAT_HSE_PRO_14_014 Document Management Procedure, ensuring: • The Operation Environmental Management Plan (OEMP or Operation EMP) is maintained and up to date; • The current version of the OEMP is readily available to managers, employees and key stakeholders; and • A copy of the OEMP is retained for a minimum of seven years. Listed below are the four most recent issues for this document. Document History Version Page Issue Date Description of Amendment(s) Prepared By Approved By No. No. 0.7 All 3-Mar-15 Additional edits following DPE comment. A Robinson S Jones 0.8 All 29-Mar-19 Update to new template. Formal Review Marie Gibbs Bruce Guy (draft) conducted as per Condition of Consent 6.5 and includes changes to procedures and practices since the previous review. Issued to NSW Ports for review. 1 All 7-Jun-19 Final revision reissued to DPE. Marie Gibbs Bruce Guy 2 Section 5-Jul-19 Updated with further details related to Marie Gibbs Bruce Guy 6.12 unpacking (opening) a container. A person using Patrick’s documents or data accepts the risk of: • Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version; and • Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Patrick. -
9.0International Gateways
9.0 International gateways Summary 9.1 Snapshot • Sydney’s international gateways of Port Botany • Even with more freight and airport customers • All of NSW, (including the regions), relies on and Sydney Airport are considered together in this using the rail network, most travel to and from the containerised imports and exports of industrial section due to their close geographic proximity, gateways will remain by road. Major investment is and consumer goods moved through Port Botany. which has implications for the portside and landside needed to augment the existing roads that link to Sydney Airport’s status as Australia’s primary aviation infrastructure of each facility. Port Botany and Sydney Airport. The WestConnex hub benefits the whole state. scheme (refer Section 6) is Infrastructure NSW’s • Port Botany and Sydney Airport have plans to principal response to the transport challenges faced • Sydney’s international gateways are expected to accommodate much of the rapid growth forecast by Sydney’s International Gateways. grow strongly over the next 20 years. for container freight and air travel over the next 20 years. Achieving this primarily requires operational • Once Port Botany reaches capacity, (which is not • Passenger numbers at Sydney Airport are forecast reform to lift productivity, not major capital works. expected to happen during the timeframe of this to double from less than 40 million in 2010 to over 80 Strategy), it is planned for Port Kembla to become million in 2031. • The major infrastructure challenge that Sydney’s NSW’s supplementary container port. International Gateways face is to the landside • Sydney Ports forecasts container movements at Port infrastructure – the roads and railway lines – that • There is no immediate need for supplementary Botany to grow from around 2 million TEUs in 2011 to connect them within the metropolitan area and airport capacity in Sydney. -
Sydney Gateway
Sydney Gateway State Significant Infrastructure Scoping Report BLANK PAGE Sydney Gateway road project State Significant Infrastructure Scoping Report Roads and Maritime Services | November 2018 Prepared by the Gateway to Sydney Joint Venture (WSP Australia Pty Limited and GHD Pty Ltd) and Roads and Maritime Services Copyright: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of NSW Roads and Maritime Services. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of NSW Roads and Maritime Services constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document controls Approval and authorisation Title Sydney Gateway road project State Significant Infrastructure Scoping Report Accepted on behalf of NSW Fraser Leishman, Roads and Maritime Services Project Director, Sydney Gateway by: Signed: Dated: 16-11-18 Executive summary Overview Sydney Gateway is part of a NSW and Australian Government initiative to improve road and freight rail transport through the important economic gateways of Sydney Airport and Port Botany. Sydney Gateway is comprised of two projects: · Sydney Gateway road project (the project) · Port Botany Rail Duplication – to duplicate a three kilometre section of the Port Botany freight rail line. NSW Roads and Maritime Services (Roads and Maritime) and Sydney Airport Corporation Limited propose to build the Sydney Gateway road project, to provide new direct high capacity road connections linking the Sydney motorway network with Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (Sydney Airport). The location of Sydney Gateway, including the project, is shown on Figure 1.1. Roads and Maritime has formed the view that the project is likely to significantly affect the environment. On this basis, the project is declared to be State significant infrastructure under Division 5.2 of the NSW Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), and needs approval from the NSW Minister for Planning. -
Draft Draft Draft Draft Draft Draft
M4 Motorway from Mays Hill to Prospect DRAFTBefore andDRAFT after opening ofDRAF the T M4 Motorway from Mays Hill to Prospect Sydney case studies in induced traffic growth Michelle E Zeibots Doctoral Candidate Institute for Sustainable Futures University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia [email protected] www.isf.uts.edu.au tel. +61-2-9209-4350 fax. +61-2-9209-4351 DRAFT WorkingDRAFT Paper DRAFT Sydney case studies in induced traffic growth 1 M4 Motorway from Mays Hill to Prospect The original version of this data set and commentary was completed in May 1997 and presented in two parts. These DRAFTwere: DRAFT DRAFT 1. Road traffic data for western Sydney sector arterials: Great Western Highway and M4 Motorway 1985 – 1995 2. Rail ticketing data and passenger journey estimates for the Western Sydney Rail Line 1985 – 1995 These have now been combined and are presented here as part of an ongoing series of case studies in induced traffic growth from the Sydney Metropolitan Region. In the first, report which focussed on road traffic volumes, an error was made. The location points of road traffic counting stations were incorrect. Although this error does not affect the general conclusions, details of some of the analysis presented in this version are different to that presented in the original papers listed above. Some data additions have also been made, and so the accompanying commentary has been expanded. Acknowledgements During the collation of this data Mr Barry Armstrong from the NSW Roads & Traffic Authority provided invaluable information on road data collection methods as well as problems with data integrity. -
NSW Freight and Ports Plan 2018-2023
NSW Freight and Ports Plan 2018-2023 September 2018 Contents Message from the Ministers 4 Executive Summary – A Plan For Action 2018-2023 6 What the Plan will achieve over the next five years 6 Objective 1: Economic growth 7 Objective 2: Efficiency, connectivity and access 8 Objective 3: Capacity 9 Objective 4: Safety 10 Objective 5: Sustainability 11 Part 1 – Introduction 13 About this Plan 13 Part 2 – Context: The State Of Freight 17 About this chapter 17 The NSW freight and ports sector at glance 17 Greater Sydney production and freight movements 26 The Greater Sydney freight network 28 Regional NSW production and freight movements 36 The regional freight network 39 Part 3 – How We Will Respond To Challenges And Opportunities 45 About this chapter 45 The five objectives 45 Objective 1: Economic growth 47 Objective 2: Efficiency, connectivity and access 51 Objective 3: Capacity 62 Objective 4: Safety 70 Objective 5: Sustainability 73 Part 4 - Implementation Plan 77 Appendix 78 Message from the Ministers The freight industry is the lifeblood of the • Deliver more than $5 billion in committed NSW economy – worth $66 billion to our key infrastructure projects for freight in State economy. From big businesses to NSW. These include $543 million towards farmers, retailers to consumers, we all rely Fixing Country Roads, $400 million on our goods getting to us in a safe and towards Fixing Country Rail, $15 million efficient manner. towards the Fixing Country Rail pilot, $21.5 million towards the Main West rail line, The NSW Freight and Ports Strategy $500 million towards the Sydney Airport released in 2013 was the first long-term Road upgrade, $400 million towards Port freight vision to be produced for NSW, Botany Rail Line duplication, $1171 million which drove targeted investment in both towards the Coffs Harbour Bypass and metropolitan and regional transport $2.2-$2.6 billion towards Sydney Gateway. -
Technical Paper 1 Traffic Report
Technical Paper 1 Traffic report 1 WestConnex Updated Strategic Business Case Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Preface .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Terminology ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Background to this report ................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Traffic methodology ........................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Road network performance without WestConnex ........................................................................... 10 1.4 Traffic effects of WestConnex.......................................................................................................... 12 1.5 Traffic operations and influence on WestConnex design ............................................................... -
Port Botany Expansion June 2003 Prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation
Port Botany Expansion June 2003 Prepared for Sydney Ports Corporation Visual Impact Assessment Architectus Sydney Pty Ltd ABN 11 098 489 448 41 McLaren Street North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia T 61 2 9929 0522 F 61 2 9959 5765 [email protected] www.architectus.com.au Cover image: Aerial view of the existing Patrick Terminal and P&O Ports Terminal looking south east. Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Methodology 5 3 Assessment criteria 6 3.1 Visibility 6 3.2 Visual absorption capacity 7 3.3 Visual Impact Rating 8 4 Location 9 5 Existing visual environment 10 5.1 Land form 10 5.2 Land use 10 5.3 Significant open space 11 5.4 Botany Bay 12 5.5 Viewing zones 13 6 Description of the Proposal 28 6.1 New terminal 28 6.2 Public Recreation & Ecological Plan 32 7 Visual impact assessment 33 7.1 Visual impact on views in the immediate vicinity 33 7.2 Visual impact on local views 44 7.3 Visual impact on regional views 49 7.4 Visual impact aerial views 59 7.5 Visual impact on views from the water 65 7.6 Visual impact during construction 74 8 Mitigation measures 75 9 Conclusion 78 Quality Assurance Reviewed by …………………………. Michael Harrison Director Urban Design and Planning Architectus Sydney Pty Ltd …………………………. Date This document is for discussion purposes only unless signed. 7300\08\12\DGS30314\Draft.22 Port Botany Expansion EIS Visual Impact Assessment Figures Figure 1. Location of Port Botany 9 Figure 2. Residential areas surrounding Port Botany 10 Figure 3. -
Existing Port Facilities CHAPTER 3
Existing Port Facilities CHAPTER 3 Summary of key outcomes: Sydney’s ports provide a vital economic gateway for the Australian and NSW economies. In 2001/02, Sydney’s ports handled approximately $42 billion worth of international trade which represents 17% of Australia’s total international trade and 56% of NSW’s international air and sea cargo trade by value. Due to its proximity to the Sydney market, Port Botany is and will remain the primary port for the import and export of containerised cargo in NSW. Currently, over 90% of container trade passing through Sydney’s ports is handled at Port Botany. Port Botany Expansion Environmental Impact Statement – Volume 1 Existing Port Facilities CHAPTER 3 3 Existing Port Facilities 3.1 Role and Significance of Sydney’s Ports The port facilities of Sydney are located at Port Botany and within Sydney Harbour. These ports, along with the airport, are the economic gateways to NSW. This is reflected by the fact that in 2001/02 Sydney’s ports handled approximately $42 billion worth of international trade. This represents: $10,000 for each person in the greater Sydney region, which has a population of close to 4 million; 56% of NSW’s total international air and sea cargo trade by value; and 17% of Australia’s total international trade. Cargo throughput through Sydney’s ports (Sydney Ports Corporation owned and private berths) during 2001/02 was 24.3 million mass tonnes, with containerised cargo accounting for 43.9%. This trade comprised more than 1 million TEUs, 183,000 motor vehicles and about 13.6 million mass tonnes of bulk and general cargo. -
Port Botany Avoids 100+ Hours in Transit Delays with NCOS Online
CASE STUDY Port Botany avoids 100+ hours in transit delays with NCOS Online In July 2020 Port Botany was able to minimize impacts to vessel transit schedules as an East Coast Low (ECL) caused hazardous conditions along most of the East Australian seaboard. As one of the largest container ports in Australia, Port Botany has taken several proactive measures to remove as many bottlenecks in the supply chain as possible. The Port has used NCOS Online since mid-2019 as one of these measures. NCOS Online is a revolutionary science- based digital port management system, which is able to dynamically and accurately plan ship transits during times of rough weather. Key Outcomes during the event of the July 2020 Australian ECL: Over 100 hours Clearing the transit More than 700K AUD of transit delays backlog 1.5 days in cost-savings for avoided faster key customers About the Client Port Botany is a deep-water seaport located in Botany Bay, Sydney. It is one of Australia’s largest container ports and specialises in trade in manufactured products and bulk liquid imports including petroleum and natural gas. Port Authority of New South Wales manages the navigation, security and operational safety needs of commercial shipping in Sydney Harbour, Port Botany, Newcastle Harbour, Port Kembla, Eden and Yamba. portauthoritynsw.com.au East Coast Lows Common during winter months, east coast lows (ECL) are one of the most dangerous weather systems to affect Australia’s east coast. These low- pressure systems have relatively long lifecycles, typically about a week, and can produce gale to storm-force winds, heavy widespread rainfall, and very rough seas and prolonged heavy swells. -
Westconnex New M5 5-122 Roads and Maritime Services Environmental Impact Statement
(blank page) WestConnex New M5 5-122 Roads and Maritime Services Environmental impact statement (blank page) WestConnex New M5 5-124 Roads and Maritime Services Environmental impact statement 5.8.1 Operational management control systems and incident and emergency response The project has been designed to include control systems to ensure safe and efficient operation of the New M5 under normal operating conditions, and to respond to incidents and other emergency events that may occur. These control systems would include: • A central motorway control centre to manage the New M5 when it is operational • Traffic monitoring and management systems along the project • Air quality monitoring and management systems within the main alignment tunnels • Incident and emergency response infrastructure • Maintenance facilities • Motorway tolling infrastructure. Motorway control centre A WestConnex motorway control centre would be provided within the Burrows Road motorway operations complex (MOC5) (refer to Figure 5-42). The motorway control centre would be the central building for all communications and control of the project’s operational management control systems. The motorway control centre would be staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and would require around 26 full time equivalent staff. The motorway control centre would include a video wall and operating interfaces for all monitoring and control systems, an incident control facility, training and incident response room, air conditioning, power supply systems and workforce facilities (ie amenities). An indicative layout of the motorway control centre is shown in Figure 5-42. Urban design principles would be applied to the motorway control centre to integrate the building with St Peters interchange and the surrounding landscape to minimise its visual impact. -
M5 Fact Sheet
NOVEMBER 2009 M5 corridor expansion – about the project The M5 transport corridor is the main road freight, commercial and commuter route between Port Botany and Sydney Airport, and south west Sydney. In recent years traffic levels and the number of heavy vehicles on this route means the corridor is operating at or near capacity during peak periods. This impacts on Sydney’s economic productivity and competitiveness. This fact sheet provides a summary of the project and provides details on how to find out more information. What is the M5 corridor? Key features of the proposed M5 corridor expansion The M5 Transport Corridor is the main road freight, are: commercial and commuter route between Port • Widening the existing M5 South West Motorway Botany and Sydney Airport, and south west Sydney. from two to three lanes in each direction. It is part of the National Highway Network • Widening the M5 East Freeway east of King connecting Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne. Georges Road to four lanes in each direction. • Four new lanes in tunnel next to the existing M5 The existing M5 Motorway can be divided into two East tunnel. sections: • A new arterial surface road from the M5 East • Section 1: The M5 South West Motorway – A 22 tunnel to the airport and the industrial areas of kilometre tolled road with two lanes in each inner southern Sydney. direction between Camden Valley Way, Prestons and King Georges Road, Beverly Hills, operated What are the benefits? by Interlink Roads. The proposed M5 corridor expansion would deliver • Section 2: The M5 East Freeway – A ten much needed additional road capacity, providing: kilometre road connecting the M5 South West • Improved access to Port Botany and Sydney Motorway with General Holmes Drive/ Eastern Airport. -
Appendix a Bankstown Council__Agency
Respondent: Bankstown Council (James Carey, Manager Sustainable Development) Aspect Issue Clarification / Response EA Section/ Specialist Study reference Cumulative The proposal does not consider the cumulative capacity of the future The Freight Demand Modelling report and the Transport and Sections 3.3.2, impacts Moorebank Intermodal Terminal currently being proposed by the Accessibility Impact Assessment report have been prepared based on 3.3.3 and 5.3.4 Commonwealth Government. The combined capacity of an estimated a total freight catchment for intrastate freight, which would be shared 2.2 million TEU per year should underpin the assessment of impacts. between the two intermodal facilities (SIMTA and MICL IMTs), should Appendix G both developments proceed. TfNSW’s submission to the Concept Freight Demand Plan EA (CD 13/21056) notes that TfNSW is satisfied that SIMTA has Modelling – adequately addressed the intermodal and capacity demands for the Transitional Part intermodal terminal, including the identification of the freight 3A Concept Plan catchment area and freight catchment split. Section 3.3.2 of the EA Application includes a discussion of the relationship between the MICL proposal (Hyder and the SIMTA proposal and notes that the intrastate freight Consulting, catchment identified in the Freight Demand Modelling report would be 2013a) shared between two proposals. Appendix F The Freight Demand Modelling Report report identifies the catchment Transport and demand for statistical local areas (SLA). The SIMTA proposal and the Accessibility MICL proposal are located within the same SLA, hence the freight Impact catchment would be shared between the two facilities (should both Assessment – proceed). This is clearly stated in Section 3.3.2 of the EA: Part 3A Concept Plan Application The SIMTA proposal has been designed to service the freight (Hyder catchment demand in its entirety, however, it is recognised that the Consulting, SIMTA proposal may not be the sole facility provided within August 2013a) Moorebank.