Patchwork Democracy Nicaraguan Politics Ten Years After the Fall by David R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Patchwork Democracy Nicaraguan Politics Ten Years After the Fall by David R Patchwork Democracy Nicaraguan Politics Ten Years After the Fall by David R. Dye with Jack Spence and George Vickers November 2000 Copyright 2000 Hemisphere Initiatives The report may be quoted at length if attributed. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part without CONTENTS the permission of Hemisphere Initiatives, Inc. David R. Dye, a Managua based research journalist Prologue 1 has resided in and provided political and economic analysis on Central America for eighteen years. He Basic Political Trends: 1990-2000 2 took principal responsibility for research and writing The Pact 7 this report. Who Benefits? 12 Jack Spence is President of Hemisphere Initiatives and is Associate Professor of Political Science at the The Pact’s Impacts 18 University of Massachusetts Boston. Spence coordinat- Conclusions 35 ed the research, made two field trips to Nicaragua, and edited all sections of the report. Endnotes 40 George Vickers is Executive Director of the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) and Treasurer of Hemisphere Initiatives. He edited all sec- tions of the report, made two field trips to Nicaragua timely and able help in making arrangements for including during the November 5th elections, and, printing and mailing. Carlos Fernando Chamorro along with Spence, wrote the analysis of the results of provided helpful information on printing and graphics the election and the performance of the Supreme and he along with Nobel León helped point toward Electoral Council during the weeks leading up to the election data. Rachel Farley of WOLA ably handled election. logistics for printing and delivery. In Managua Y made We would like to thank all those who granted us time implemented arrangements for printing and delivery. for interviews. They are mentioned in the endnotes. In We gratefully acknowledge a grant from PRODECA addition Claudia Ferreira Talero not only has translat- that made this report possible and covered almost all ed the report into Spanish but also provided help in making arrangements for printing and delivery of the of the expenses. WOLA covered travel expenses for reports. Nick Thorkelson of Thorkelson Graphics, Vickers and a portion of administrative costs. A por- Somerville, Massachusetts (www.nickthorkelson.com) tion of Spence’s travel expenses was covered by a did the graphic design and layout. Diane Chomsky, research grant from the John W. McCormack Guillermo Fernandez, and Kathy Sevilla provided Institute at the University of Massachusetts Boston. Final editorial content is the responsibility of Spence and Vickers and Hemisphere Initiatives. Additional copies of this report and other Hemisphere Initiatives reports (listed on the inside back cover) can be obtained from Hemisphere Initiatives [email protected] [email protected] Or at the Hemisphere Initiatives web site at http://www.geocities.com/hem_init/ Or from Washington Office on Latin America 1630 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20009 202 797-2171 [email protected] Patchwork Democracy Nicaraguan Politics Ten Years After the Fall PROLOGUE ver the past fifteen years, most coun- of the revolutionary Sandinista government in tries of Latin America have passed from February 1990, the country passed through a Oauthoritarian dictatorship to having second peaceful election for national and local democratically elected governments. In these authorities in October 1996. The army has procedural democracies, as some political scientists kept itself aloof from the political fray since a call them, officials are elected in a free and fair reform of civil-military relations in 1994. And manner, and there is inclusive suffrage, freedom in recent years, the vigorous efforts of a crusad- of expression and organization, and association- ing comptroller-general offered promise of a al autonomy.1 cleanup of the nation’s endemic corruption. It is proving more difficult, however, for Ten years after local and international many of these countries to move beyond the upheavals thrust Nicaragua on the path toward electoral trappings of democracy to construct liberal democracy, however, a closer look sug- effective democratic institutions capable of pro- gests that democratic rule and governability in viding justice, protecting rights, and delivering Nicaragua remain fragile. During the both security and economic betterment. Chamorro administration, Nicaragua’s National According to one cogent appraisal, “electoral Assembly passed important constitutional procedures are being institutionalized in a reforms and timid institutional reforms began. number of countries, to be sure, but all too The advances achieved during the Chamorro often these co-exist with pervasive clientelism, administration were a kind of crazy quilt imbedded injustice, massive corruption, fla- stitched together by ad hoc, unstable compro- grant impunity and reserved domains beyond mises following political battles over funda- the authority of government and the rule of mental issues of governance and economic func- law.”2 While such practices are found to vary- tion. Foreign aid has helped hold the patches ing degrees in established democracies as well, together. But key problems of governance are in the context of recent transition in Latin likely to continue until the country begins to America they are eroding faith in the democra- grapple more seriously with its central political tic option. problem—the consolidation of the rule of law, Now neglected by foreign academics and or as a noted scholar of politics has called it, the news media, Nicaragua has not been one of the democratic state of law.3 countries prompting special concern. In spite of Although there were variations of degree, for political vicissitudes and the recent disaster of most of the last century Nicaraguan political Hurricane Mitch, it has appeared to make fitful leaders looked upon government as a fount of progress toward the general goals of democratic enrichment and a cornucopia of resources with development. Since Violeta Chamorro’s defeat which to pay off friends and build political 2 Patchwork Democracy empires. To protect this corruption they have Nicaragua cannot be content with a “patch- needed impunity: pliant legislators, venal work democracy.” The country’s history sug- courts, auditors who could be easily bribed. gests that a political system based on exclusion Though constitutional facelifts have been fre- and that allows injustice and corruption to fes- quent, the political will necessary to seriously ter, is likely to generate growing discontent to reform “intermediate” institutions of the demo- the point where a breakdown of democratic cratic state such as courts and systems of con- order becomes thinkable. We recognize that trol has been notoriously weak. consolidation of democracy is a long-term The most recent political reform in Nicaragua problem — only a short interval has elapsed was a pact signed in January 2000 by the coun- since 1990. But vigilance in the Nicaraguan try’s two principal political forces. The signers case is warranted. The country does not possess — the ruling Liberal Constitutionalist Party many of the normal requisites for democratic (PLC) of president Arnoldo Aleman and the stability. Poverty is rife and inequality glaring. Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) And the political culture remains permeated by headed by Daniel Ortega — argue that their the legacy of authoritarianism and violence that accord will strengthen democratic institutions has marked the country’s history. and bolster governability. Critics of the agree- ment insist that it will do just the opposite. Eleven years after Hemisphere Initiatives’ This report raises strong doubts about first report on political transition in Nicaragua, whether the new rules for political competition this report examines the nature, the roots and and institutional functioning legislated this the likely consequences of the Liberal- year are laying the groundwork for further Sandinista pact. The document that follows progress toward fortifying the rule of law or for sketches a portrait of recent Nicaraguan poli- Nicaragua’s democratic progress more general- tics, details the content and origins of the new ly. These rules may be fomenting a stable sys- political accord, and assesses the impacts of the tem of deal making among a few players in an agreement after six months in the areas of insti- atmosphere marked by public cynicism and tution-building and functioning, and political apathy. But they also may be creating condi- party competition tions for a new political crisis that will thrust The body of this report was written before Nicaragua once again into the arena of hemi- the November 5th elections. The Conclusion spheric concern. contains a brief analysis of the elections. BASIC POLITICAL TRENDS: 1990–2000 ver the last two decades, Nicaragua has with the U.S. and copious US assistance to undergone extraordinary and wrench- Nicaragua’s contra rebels led to a highly Oing changes of a magnitude and inten- destructive war. That and failure of the revolu- sity matched by few other countries. In 1979, tion’s economic project set the stage for the it passed abruptly from 46 years of unbroken election of Violeta Chamorro as president.5 despotic rule by the Somoza family into a con- In the early 1990s, presidency minister vulsive period of economic and political change Antonio Lacayo, the chief decision-maker in as the revolutionary Sandinista National the Chamorro government, took to referring to Liberation Front (FSLN) took
Recommended publications
  • Disrupting the Party: a Case Study of Ahora Madrid and Its Participatory Innovations
    Disrupting the Party: A Case Study of Ahora Madrid and Its Participatory Innovations Quinton Mayne and Cecilia Nicolini September 2020 Disrupting the Party: A Case Study of Ahora Madrid and Its Participatory Innovations Quinton Mayne and Cecilia Nicolini September 2020 disrupting the party: A Case Study of Ahora Madrid and Its Participatory Innovations letter from the editor The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excel- lence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion. By training the very best leaders, developing powerful new ideas, and disseminating innovative solutions and institutional reforms, the Ash Center’s goal is to meet the profound challenges facing the world’s citizens. Our Occasional Papers Series highlights new research and commentary that we hope will engage our readers and prompt an energetic exchange of ideas in the public policy community. This paper is contributed by Quinton Mayne, Ford Foundation Associate Profes- sor of Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School and an Ash Center faculty associate, and Cecilia Nicolini, a former Ash Center Research Fellow and a current advisor to the president of Argentina. The paper addresses issues that lie at the heart of the work of the Ash Center—urban governance, democratic deepening, participatory innova- tions, and civic technology. It does this through a study of the fascinating rise of Ahora Madrid, a progressive electoral alliance that—to the surprise of onlookers—managed to gain political control, just a few months after being formed, of the Spanish capital following the 2015 municipal elections. Headed by the unassuming figure of Manuela Carmena, a former judge, Ahora Madrid won voters over with a bold agenda that reimagined the relationship between citizens and city hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulls and Donkeys. National Identity and Symbols in Catalonia and Spain
    9TH ANNUAL JOAN GILI MEMORIAL LECTURE Miquel Strubell i Trueta Bulls and donkeys. National identity and symbols in Catalonia and Spain The Anglo-Catalan Society 2008 2 Bulls and donkeys. National identity and symbols in Catalonia and Spain 9TH ANNUAL JOAN GILI MEMORIAL LECTURE Miquel Strubell i Trueta Bulls and donkeys. National identity and symbols in Catalonia and Spain The Anglo-Catalan Society 2008 2 3 The Annual Joan Gili Memorial Lecture Bulls and donkeys. National identity and symbols in Catalonia and 1 Spain In this paper, after an initial discussion about what identity means and how to measure it, I intend to review some studies and events in Spain in which identity issues arise. The conclusion will be reached that identities in Spain, in regard to people’s relationship with Spain itself and with Catalonia, are by no means shared, and the level of both stereotyping and prejudice, on the one hand, and of collective insecurity (even “self-hatred”) on the other, are, I claim, higher than in consolidated nation-states of western Europe, with the partial exceptions of the United Kingdom and Belgium. Let me from the outset say how honoured I am, in having been invited to deliver this paper, to follow in the footsteps of such outstanding Catalan academics as Mercè Ibarz, Antoni Segura, Joan F. Mira, Marta Pessarrodona, Miquel Berga … and those before them. The idea of dedicating what up till then had been the Fundació Congrés de Cultura lectures to the memory of Joan Gili (Barcelona 1907 - Oxford 1998) was an inspiration. Unlike some earlier Memorial lecturers, however, I was fortunate enough to have a special personal relationship with him and, of course, with his wife Elizabeth.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Mission to Venezuela, Colombia and Nicaragua
    Report on the Mission to Venezuela, Colombia and Nicaragua Bruce S. Gelb President, Council of American Ambassadors United States Ambassador to Belgium, 1991-1993 Director, United States Information Agency, 1989-1991 he Council of American Ambassadors selected Venezuela, Colombia and Nicaragua for its 2006 fact-finding mission for three reasons: first, to show T that, despite heavy focus on the Middle East, the United States (US) was very definitely concerned with the problems and opportunities of Central and South America; second, we wanted to see at first hand if the reports on Venezuela becoming a totalitarian country were accurate; third, knowing of the anti-American activities flowing from Venezuela’s President Chávez, we hoped to provide the antidote of some “feet on the ground” US Public Diplomacy. The scholarly work of our rapporteur, Marcos Gonzalez, with input from delegation members, follows this introduction but, on a personal note, our mission revealed a region requiring major US attention best characterized by our final meeting in Caracas with an elected anti-Chávez politician, who described the fourth unsuccessful assassination attempt on his life by relating how his bodyguard died in his arms from bullet wounds. * * * The Council of American Ambassadors sponsored a mission to Venezuela, Colombia and Nicaragua from September 17-27, 2006. The delegation of seven ambassadors, joined by an additional two in Colombia, visited Caracas, Bogotá, Managua and León.1 The objective was to examine the current political, economic and social climate of each nation and the state of its relations with the United States. In this year of significant electoral flux in the Western Hemisphere, election systems, candidates and political parties merited particular scrutiny in Nicaragua and Venezuela, as did the condition of Colombia’s newly re-elected President and his ongoing struggle with three terrorist groups.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2006 / 1
    SOCIALIST VOICE / NOVEMBER 2006 / 1 Contents 131. The Russian Revolution and National Freedom. John Riddell 132. Two Views on Cuba’s Leadership Transition. Mike Gonzalez, John Riddell 133. Challenges for Venezuela’s Revolution: An Interview with Michael Lebowitz 134. Nicaragua: The FSLN’s Evolution Since 1990. Phil Cournoyer 135. Nicaraguan Voters Rebuff Imperialism. Phil Cournoyer ——————————————————————————————————— Socialist Voice #131, November 1, 2006 The Russian Revolution and National Freedom How the early Soviet government led the struggle for liberation of Russia’s oppressed peoples By John Riddell co-editor, Socialist Voice. When Bolivian President Evo Morales formally opened his country’s Constituent Assembly on August 6, 2006, he highlighted the aspirations of Bolivia’s indigenous majority as the central challenge before the gathering. The convening of the Assembly, he said, represented a “historic moment to refound our dearly beloved homeland Bolivia.” When Bolivia was created, in 1825- 26, “the originary indigenous movements” who had fought for independence “were excluded,” and subsequently were discriminated against and looked down upon. But the “great day has arrived today … for the originary indigenous peoples.” (http://boliviarising.blogspot.com/, Aug. 14, 2006) During the preceding weeks, indigenous organizations had proposed sweeping measures to assure their rights, including guarantees for their languages, autonomy for indigenous regions, and respect for indigenous culture and political traditions. This movement extends far beyond Bolivia. Massive struggles based on indigenous peoples have shaken Ecuador and Peru, and the reverberations are felt across the Western Hemisphere. Measures to empower indigenous minorities are among the most prestigious achievements of the Bolivarian movement in Venezuela. At first glance, these indigenous struggles bear characteristic features of national movements, aimed at combating oppression, securing control of national communities, and protecting national culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Extent of Felix's Devastation Still Unfolding
    C$20 www.nicatimes.net Friday, September 14, 2007 – Granada, Nicaragua An 8-Page Publication of The Tico Times Extent of Felix’s Devastation Still Unfolding By Tim Rogers and Brian Harris date: 67 dead; 138 missing; 135 rescued and The Nica Times 150,542 affected. Though prospects are dimming that those BILWI – As the country completed three still missing will turn up safe or be rescued, days of national mourning this week in obser- some incredible tales of survival have started vance of those killed by last week’s Hurricane to emerge from the wreckage, including the Felix, rescue workers on the Caribbean coast story of one woman who gave birth as the continued the tireless and grim work of air- hurricane ripped by overhead and destroyed lifting emergency supplies to isolated indige- her home. nous communities and trying to accurately Nicaraguan naval patrols, meanwhile, assess damage and death tolls. pulled 41 people from the Caribbean waters As the scope of the devastating tragedy Sept. 7, four full days after the storm swept continues to unfold, several rescue workers them into the water. The 40 men and one and outside observers compared the natural woman survived by tying themselves to disaster to the 2005 Hurricane Katrina, which pieces of wood from destroyed homes and devastated the U.S. city of New Orleans and ships they found in the water. much of the U.S. Gulf Coast. Showing signs of trauma and exhaustion “For us this is an invisible Katrina,” said from the ordeal, the group, mostly lobster Alejandro López, a United Nations represen- divers, was met by a large crowd of townsfolk tative of the World Food Programme in the in Bilwi, many showing up in hopes that rel- northern hamlet of Kurkira.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua: the Threat of a Good Example?
    DiannaMelrose First Published 1985 Reprinted 1986,1987,1989 ©Oxfam 1985 Preface © Oxfam 1989 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Melrose, Dianna Nicaragua: the threat of a good example. 1. Nicaragua. Economic conditions I. Title 330.97285'053 ISBN 0-85598-070-2 ISBN 0 85598 070 2 Published by Oxfam, 274 Banbury Road, Oxford, 0X2 7DZ, UK. Printed by Oxfam Print Unit OX196/KJ/89 This book converted to digital file in 2010 Contents Preface vii Introduction 1 Chronology of Political Developments 2 1. The Somoza Era 4 The Miskitos and the Atlantic Coast The 1972 Earthquake Land Expropriation Obstacles to Community Development The Somoza Legacy 2. A New Start for the People 12 The Literacy Crusade Adult Education New Schools Public Health Miners' Health Land Reform New Cooperatives Food Production Consumption of Basic Foods Loss of Fear The Open Prisons Obstacles to Development 3. Development Under Fire 27 Miskito Resettlement Programme Disruption of Development Work Resettlement of Displaced People Economic Costs of the Fighting 4. Debt, Trade and Aid 39 Debt Trade Aid 5. The Role of Britain and Europe 45 UK Bilateral Aid Other European Donors EEC Aid Trade A Political Solution Europe's Role 6. Action for Change: Summary and Recommendations 59 Notes and References Abbreviations Further Reading iii IV Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank all the Nicaraguan people who gener- ously gave their time to help with research for this book, particularly Oxfam friends and project-holders who gave invaluable assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ends of Modernization: Development, Ideology, and Catastrophe in Nicaragua After the Alliance for Progress
    THE ENDS OF MODERNIZATION: DEVELOPMENT, IDEOLOGY, AND CATASTROPHE IN NICARAGUA AFTER THE ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESS A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by David Johnson Lee December 2015 Examining Committee Members: Dr. Richard Immerman, Advisory Chair, History, Temple University Dr. Harvey Neptune, History, Temple University Dr. David Farber, History, University of Kansas Dr. Michel Gobat, History, University of Iowa © Copyright 2015 by David Johnson Lee All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation traces the cultural and intellectual history of Nicaragua from the heyday of modernization as ideology and practice in the 1960s, when U.S. planners and politicians identified Nicaragua as a test case for the Alliance for Progress, to the triumph of neoliberalism in the 1990s. The modernization paradigm, implemented through collusion between authoritarian dictatorship and the U.S. development apparatus, began to fragment following the earthquake that destroyed Managua in 1972. The ideas that constituted this paradigm were repurposed by actors in Nicaragua and used to challenge the dominant power of the U.S. government, and also to structure political competition within Nicaragua. Using interviews, new archival material, memoirs, novels, plays, and newspapers in the United States and Nicaragua, I trace the way political actors used ideas about development to make and unmake alliances within Nicaragua, bringing about first the Sandinista Revolution, then the Contra War, and finally the neoliberal government that took power in 1990. I argue that because of both a changing international intellectual climate and resistance on the part of the people of Nicaragua, new ideas about development emphasizing human rights, pluralism, entrepreneurialism, indigenous rights, and sustainable development came to supplant modernization theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua, 1977-1979 Hollie Hicks 30 October 2012 Dr. Mark Pitten
    The Public Debate Over Carter’s Human Rights Foreign Policy: Nicaragua, 1977-1979 Hollie Hicks 30 October 2012 Dr. Mark Pittenger, History Dr. John Willis, History Dr. Andy Baker, Political Science Hicks 1 Thank you to those who helped me with this project and made it happen. To my Professors, Dr. Mark Pittenger and Dr. John Willis for guiding me through this process. To Hayley E. B. Stephens and Dale Espy Hicks for being my editors. To the rest of my family and friends for supporting my endeavor. Hicks 2 Contents Abstract pg. 3 Timeline pg. 4 Map of Nicaragua pg. 5 Introduction pg. 6 Chapter One: Setting the Stage pg. 12 Chapter Two: 1977 pg. 27 Chapter Three: 1978 pg. 47 Chapter Four: 1979 pg. 62 Conclusion pg. 75 Bibliography pg. 78 Hicks 3 Abstract This paper looks at the views of intellectuals regarding Jimmy Carter’s human rights foreign policy because Carter was the first president who overtly made human rights a part of his policies. He wanted the United States to be a champion of rights around the world. There has not been an extensive study as to what intellectuals during his presidency thought of his policies. To narrow the topic further, this essay focuses on the thoughts about U.S. policies toward Nicaragua. Research included looking at two American newspapers, numerous magazines and the opposition newspaper La Prensa in Nicaragua, digitally, as well as in print and on microfilm. Through this research, I found that intellectuals in the United States thought Carter’s policies were uneven in their application, by favoring allies and communist countries and condemning actions in Third World countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Arbiter: the Role of the Judiciary in the Democratic Consolidation Process in Nicaragua and Costa Rica
    THE DEMOCRATIC ARBITER: THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN THE DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION PROCESS IN NICARAGUA AND COSTA RICA By LEE D. WALKER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this work is the end of one journey and the beginning of another. In this sense it is a good place to pause and let some very important people know what they have meant to my intellectual and academic development. I am still far from being the scholar that I desire to be, but I have made it this far thanks to the support and encouragement of the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida. I express my sincere gratitude to my supervisory committee of Leslie Anderson, Terry McCoy, Philip Williams, Michael Martinez, Albert Matheny, and George Casella. First, Dr. Anderson has been a wonderful mentor and advisor. She guided me through my master’s degree in Latin American studies and has always been supportive and encouraging about the direction of my work. I am particularly grateful that she has instilled in me an appreciation of and a desire to use diverse methodological approaches to understand the questions of political science. Second, I thank Terry McCoy. He was my first advisor at the University of Florida, and I have relied on his wisdom my entire stay at the University. Next, I express my sincere gratitude to Philip Williams, for his help on the dissertation and for giving me the opportunity to work with him on my first collaborative writing project.
    [Show full text]