Deliverable 1.2 Process Knowledge from Existing Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deliverable 1.2 Process Knowledge from Existing Data Deliverable 1.2 Process knowledge from existing data PAradigm for Novel Dynamic Oceanic Resource Assessments Grant agreement No: 773713 Project funded by the European Commission within the Horizon 2020 Programme Start date of project: 1st May 2018 Duration: 48 months Deliverable D 1.2 Process knowledge from existing data Due date of deliverable: Project month 18, 31 October 2019 Actual submission date: Dissemination Level: CO1 Type of deliverable: Report Main Authors: Alexander Kemp, Patricia Reglero, Rudi Voss, Pascal Lorance, Stefan Neuenfeldt, Jane Behrens, Øyvind Fiksen WP Leader: Jane Behrens, DTU 1 PU: Public, PP: Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services), RE: Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services), CO: Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) PANDORA Project The Blue Growth of European fisheries is at risk due to over-exploitation, unforeseen changes in stock productivity, loss of markets for capture fisheries due to aquaculture, future trade agreements opening European markets to external fleets, and fluctuations in the price of oil and other business costs. All of these risks need to be considered when providing advice needed to sustainably maximize profits for the diverse array of fisheries operating in European waters and to help safeguard the benefits this sector provides to the social coherence of local, coastal communities. PANDORA aims to: 1. Create more realistic assessments and projections of changes in fisheries resources (30 stocks) by utilizing new biological knowledge (spatial patterns, environmental drivers, food-web interactions and density-dependence) including, for the first time, proprietary data sampled by pelagic fishers. 2. Advice on how to secure long-term sustainability of EU fish stocks (maximum sustainable/”pretty good” and economic yields) and elucidate tradeoffs between profitability and number of jobs in their (mixed demersal, mixed pelagic and single species) fisheries fleets. Provide recommendations on how to stabilize the long-term profitability of European fisheries. 3. Develop a public, internet-based resource tool box (PANDORAs Box of Tools), including assessment modelling and stock projections code, economic models, and region- and species- specific decision support tools; increase ownership and contribution opportunities of the industry to the fish stock assessment process through involvement in data sampling and training in data collection, processing and ecosystem-based fisheries management. The project will create new knowledge (via industry-led collection, laboratory and field work, and theoretical simulations), new collaborative networks (industry, scientists and advisory bodies) and new mechanisms (training courses and management tools) to ensure relevance, utility and impact. Project receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 773713 Deliverable data Project / Grant Agreement 773713 Number Project title and acronym PAradigm for Novel Dynamic Oceanic Resource Assessments Type of action: RIA, Research and Innovation action Call identifier: H2020-SFS-2017-2 Topic: SFS-21-2016-2017 Advancing basic biological knowledge and improving management tools for commercially important fish and other seafood species Starting date: 01.05.1018 Duration: 48 months Work Package(s) / Task(s): Work Package 1/ Task 1.2 Lead beneficiary: DTU Aqua / University of Bergen Main author: Øyvind Fiksen Co-authors: Jane Behrens, Jane Behrens, Stefan Neuenfeldt, Rudi Voss, Bernhard Kühn, Alexander Kempf, Tobias van Kooten, Patricia Reglero, Manuel Hidalgo, Pascal Lorance, Chris Griffiths, Oliver Hogg, Hayley Bannister, Myron Peck, Paolo Domenici, Matteo Sinerchia, Francesco Colloca, Stefano Marras, Gary Carvalho, Dimitrios Damalas, Diego Alvarez-Berastegui Date of delivery: 31.10.2019 Deliverable type: Report Date of internal approval 29.10.2019 (for the submission to EC) Approved by: (name) Stefan Neuenfeldt Keywords: Ecology, Marine biology, Fishery, Ecosystem-based fisheries management, management reference points, recruitment, density dependence, stock assessment Contributing partners No. Short name Full name Name and contact info of persons involved Editors: 7 UiB University of Bergen Øyvind Fiksen [email protected] 1 DTU-Aqua Danmarks Tekniske Universitet Jane Behrens, Stefan Neuenfeldt [email protected] Contributors: 9 CAU Christian-Albrechts-Universität Rudi Voss zu Kiel [email protected] 14 TI Thünen Institut für Seefischerei Bernhard Kühn bernhard.kü[email protected] Alexander Kempf [email protected] 16 WR Stichting Wageningen Research Tobias van Kooten [email protected] 6 IEO Instituto Español de Oceanografia Patricia Reglero [email protected] Manuel Hidalgo [email protected] 8 IFREMER Institut Française pour Pascal Lorance l’Exploratation de la Mer [email protected] 5 CEFAS Centre for Environment, Fisheries Chris Griffiths and Aquaculture [email protected] Oliver Hogg, Hayley Bannister 4 UHAM University of Hamburg Myron Peck [email protected] 3 IAMC-CNR Italian National Research Council Paolo Domenici, Matteo Oristano Sinerchia, Francesco Colloca, Stefano Marras [email protected] 2 BU Bangor University Gary Carvalho [email protected] 11 HCMR Hellenic Centre for Marine Dimitrios Damalas Research [email protected] 18 SOCIB Balearic Islands Coastal Diego Alvarez-Berastegui Observing and Forecasting [email protected] System Organization across regions: The North Sea: Alexander Kempf (TI), UHAM, CEFAS, DTU, WR Eastern Baltic Sea: Rudi Voss (CAU), DTU, BU Bay of Biscay: Pascal Lorance (IFREMER) The Mediterranean Sea: Patricia Reglero (IEO), HCMR, IAMC, SOCIB Document history Version Date Description 01 1.0 Initial version, Øyvind Fiksen 02 14th Sept First collection of contributions 03 25th Sept All parts collected, first complete draft 04 10th Oct Revision 1 05 29th Oct Revision 2 1 Contents List of symbols and abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. 8 2 Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Defining the Challenge .......................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Approach ............................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Contribution to the project ................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Summary of existing knowledge from each region ............................................................... 12 2.5.1 The North Sea ................................................................................................................ 12 2.5.2 The Baltic Sea ................................................................................................................ 13 2.5.3 Bay of Biscay .................................................................................................................. 14 2.5.4 The Mediterranean Sea ................................................................................................. 14 3 List of Annexes ........................................................................................................................................................ 15 4 Status and planned activities within each region .................................................................................... 15 4.1 The North Sea ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.1.1 The regional scoping of management needs ................................................................ 15 4.1.2 Recruitment dynamics in cod, herring, haddock, saithe, whiting ................................. 16 4.1.3 Knowledge and data gaps in North Sea stocks .............................................................. 24 4.1.4 Climate change impacts on the distribution of North Sea stocks and predicted shifts in distribution .................................................................................................................................... 25 4.1.5 Knowledge and Data Gaps for climate change scenarios ............................................. 28 4.1.6 Density dependent effects with focus on North Sea flatfish ........................................ 29 4.1.7 Stock/Spatial structure of North Sea cod and Plaice ..................................................... 31 4.1.8 Available knowledge on North Sea food web interactions relevant for stock assessments and fisheries management. ...................................................................................... 33 4.1.9 Activities in PANDORA to fill the gaps (or needs) – The North Sea ............................... 36 4.2 Eastern Baltic Sea .................................................................................................................. 39 Existing knowledge relevant to the needs – Eastern Baltic Sea .................................................... 39 4.2.1 Abiotic factors
Recommended publications
  • Combined!Effects!In!Europe's!Seas!
    OCP/EEA/NSS/18/002.ETC/ICM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ETC/ICM!Technical!Report!4/2019! Multiple!pressures!and!their! combined!effects!in!Europe’s!seas! Prepared!by!/!compiled!by:!! Samuli!Korpinen,!Katja!Klančnik! Authors:!! Samuli Korpinen & Katja Klančnik (editors), Monika Peterlin, Marco Nurmi, Leena Laamanen, Gašper Zupančič, Ciarán Murray, Therese Harvey, Jesper H Andersen, Argyro Zenetos, Ulf Stein, Leonardo Tunesi, Katrina Abhold, GerJan Piet, Emilie Kallenbach, Sabrina Agnesi, Bas Bolman, David Vaughan, Johnny Reker & Eva Royo Gelabert ETC/ICM'Consortium'Partners:'' Helmholtz!Centre!for!Environmental!Research!(UFZ),!Fundación!AZTI,!Czech!Environmental! Information!Agency!(CENIA),!Ioannis!Zacharof&!Associates!Llp!Hydromon!Consulting! Engineers!(CoHI(Hydromon)),!Stichting!Deltares,!Ecologic!Institute,!International!Council!for! the!Exploration!of!the!Sea!(ICES),!Italian!National!Institute!for!Environmental!Protection!and! Research!(ISPRA),!Joint!Nature!Conservation!Committee!Support!Co!(JNCC),!Middle!East! Technical!University!(METU),!Norsk!Institutt!for!Vannforskning!(NIVA),!Finnish!Environment! Institute!(SYKE),!Thematic!Center!for!Water!Research,!Studies!and!Projects!development!! (TC!Vode),!Federal!Environment!Agency!(UBA),!University!Duisburg.Essen!(UDE)! ! ! ! Cover'photo! ©!Tihomir!Makovec,!Marine!biology!station!Piran,!Slovenia! ' Layout! F&U!confirm,!Leipzig! ! Legal'notice' The!contents!of!this!publication!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!official!opinions!of!the!European!Commission!or!other!institutions!
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple!Pressures!And!Their! Combined!Effects!In!Europe's!Seas!
    OCP/EEA/NSS/18/002.ETC/ICM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ETC/ICM!Technical!Report!4/2019! Multiple!pressures!and!their! combined!effects!in!Europe’s!seas! Prepared!by!/!compiled!by:!! Samuli!Korpinen,!Katja!Klančnik! Authors:!! Monika Peterlin, Marco Nurmi, Leena Laamanen, Gašper Zupančič, Andreja Popit, Ciarán Murray, Therese Harvey, Jesper H Andersen, Argyro Zenetos, Ulf Stein, Leonardo Tunesi, Katrina Abhold, GerJan Piet, Emilie Kallenbach, Sabrina Agnesi, Bas Bolman, David Vaughan, Johnny Reker & Eva Royo Gelabert ETC/ICM'Consortium'Partners:'' Helmholtz!Centre!for!Environmental!Research!(UFZ),!Fundación!AZTI,!Czech!Environmental! Information!Agency!(CENIA),!Ioannis!Zacharof&!Associates!Llp!Hydromon!Consulting! Engineers!(CoHI(Hydromon)),!Stichting!Deltares,!Ecologic!Institute,!International!Council!for! the!Exploration!of!the!Sea!(ICES),!Italian!National!Institute!for!Environmental!Protection!and! Research!(ISPRA),!Joint!Nature!Conservation!Committee!Support!Co!(JNCC),!Middle!East! Technical!University!(METU),!Norsk!Institutt!for!Vannforskning!(NIVA),!Finnish!Environment! Institute!(SYKE),!Thematic!Center!for!Water!Research,!Studies!and!Projects!development!! (TC!Vode),!Federal!Environment!Agency!(UBA),!University!Duisburg.Essen!(UDE)! ! ! ! Cover'photo! ©!Tihomir!Makovec,!Marine!biology!station!Piran,!Slovenia! ' Layout! F&U!confirm,!Leipzig! ! Legal'notice' The!contents!of!this!publication!do!not!necessarily!reflect!the!official!opinions!of!the!European!Commission!or!other!institutions! of!the!European!Union.!Neither!the!European!Environment!Agency,!the!European!Topic!Centre!on!Inland,!Coastal!and!Marine!
    [Show full text]
  • The Feeding Ecology of Grey Gurnard, Eutrigla Gurnardus, Off the Coast of Scotland
    The Feeding Ecology of Grey Gurnard, Eutrigla gurnardus, off the coast of Scotland. Abstract Until recently, little research had been conducted into the feeding ecology of grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus), and the species’ wider interaction with the ecosystems it inhabits. This study was carried out to address several questions that have recently arisen about the species. Mainly whether the grey gurnard population at Rockall Bank have been predating on the juvenile haddock to a degree that could cause the stock to decline. This was assessed by conducting a stomach contents analysis on a sample of grey gurnard caught on several trawls. The results of this were inconclusive, with only 3 stomachs containing potential haddock remains out of a total of 121 stomachs. However, these results do not completely disprove the hypothesis, as other factors may have influenced the low fish intake in these gurnard. Furthermore, the populations of grey gurnard from Rockall Bank and the Firth of Forth were compared to determine any differences in feeding ecology between the two. It emerged that the two populations were reasonably similar, with smaller size classes consuming less fish and proportionally more invertebrates, while larger size classes had a diet that was predominantly fish, with the fish prey consisting largely of sand eels. Finally, the influence of fish size on prey selection was investigated, with the result showing a clear correlation between increasing fish size and increasing prey mass, likely owing to the greater amount of fish prey that makes up a larger gurnard’s diet. Introduction: Grey gurnard, Eutrigla gurnadus, is a demersal marine species that has a wide distribution throughout the North Atlantic and the North Sea (Vinogradov et al., 2014; Floeter et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gurnard in the North East Atlantic, Demersal Otter Trawl
    Red gurnard in the North East Atlantic, Demersal otter trawl Red gurnard in the North East Atlantic, Demersal otter trawl Content last updated 27th Jan 2016 Stock: Red gurnard in the North East Atlantic Management: EU Overview Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) is a widespread demersal species on the Northeast Atlantic shelf, distributed from South Norway and north of the British Isles to Mauritania. The species is found in depths between 20 and 250m living on gravel or coarse sandy substrate. Higher occurrences of red gurnard with patchy distribution have been observed along the Western approaches from the Shetlands Islands to the Celtic Seas and the Channel. A continuous distribution of fish crossing the Channel and the area West of Brittany does not suggest a separation of the Divisions VIId from VIIe and VIIh. Therefore a split of the population between the Ecoregions does not seem appropriate. Further investigations are needed to progress on stocks boundaries such as morphometric studies, tagging and genetic population studies. Red gurnard feeds on a variety of small invertebrates, bottom dwelling fish and benthic shellfish and crustaceans. Length at first maturity has been reported at approximately 25cm. Spawning occurs between February and June. Currently, all red gurnards in the Northeast Atlantic are treated as a single stock. Considering their behaviour, future assessment and management should identify and treat separate spawning aggregations independently. Red gurnard is mainly taken as a bycatch in mixed demersal fisheries for flatfish and roundfish, as the market is limited a larger part of the gurnard catch is discarded. Gurnards have been landed as a mixed generic gurnard catch and therefore landings of red gurnard are uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Azores Ecoregion Published 12 December 2019
    ICES Ecosystem Overviews Azores ecoregion Published 12 December 2019 3.1 Azores ecoregion – Ecosystem overview Table of contents Ecoregion description ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Key signals within the environment and the ecosystem .............................................................................................................................. 2 Pressures ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 State of the ecosystem components ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Sources and acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Sources and references .............................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Ecoregion description For this overview, the Azores ecoregion corresponds to the Azores Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) inside ICES Subarea 10 (Figure 1). The ecoregion lies within a much larger open ocean ecosystem, and straddles the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of North Sea Fishes
    ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes Based on bottom-trawl survey data for the years 1985—1987 Ruud J. Knijn1, Trevor W. Boon2, Henk J. L. Heessen1, and John R. G. Hislop3 'Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Haringkade 1, PO Box 6 8 , 1970 AB Umuiden, The Netherlands 2MAFF, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, England 3Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8 DB, Scotland Fish illustrations by Peter Stebbing International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2—4, DK-1261 Copenhagen K, Denmark September 1993 Copyright ® 1993 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by photostat or microfilm or stored in a storage system or retrieval system or by any other means without written permission from the authors and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Illustrations ® 1993 Peter Stebbing Published with financial support from the Directorate-General for Fisheries, AIR Programme, of the Commission of the European Communities ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes ISSN 1017-6195 Printed in Denmark Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2. Recruit surveys.................................................................................. 3 2.1 General purpose of the surveys.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Working Group on Fish Ecology (WGFE). ICES CM 2009
    ICES WGFE REPORT 2009 ICES LIVING RESOURCES COMMITTEE ICES CM 2009/LRC:08 REF. SCICOM, ACOM, SSICC Report of the Working Group on Fish Ecology (WGFE) 26–30 October 2009 ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 200 9. Report of the Working Group on Fish Ecology (WGFE), 26–30 October 2009, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES CM 2009/LRC:08. 133 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2009 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGFE REPORT 2009 | i Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Terms of reference for 2009 ................................................................................. 3 1.2 Participants ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Background...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Over Danske Saltvandsfisk Spidstandet Blankesten
    Atlas over danske saltvandsfisk Spidstandet blankesten Pagellus bogaraveo (Brünnich, 1768) Af Henrik Carl Spidstandet blankesten på 32,3 cm fra fiskehandler på Sicilien, 16. juli 2016. © Henrik Carl. Projektet er finansieret af Aage V. Jensen Naturfond Alle rettigheder forbeholdes. Det er tilladt at gengive korte stykker af teksten med tydelig kildehenvisning. Teksten bedes citeret således: Carl, H. 2017. Atlas over danske saltvandsfisk – Spidstandet blankesten. Statens Naturhistoriske Museum. Online-udgivelse, november 2017. Systematik og navngivning Arten blev oprindelig beskrevet som Sparus bogaraveo Brünnich, 1768. Senere blev den flyttet til slægten Pagellus Valenciennes, 1830. Med den nuværende systematik omfatter slægten seks arter (Froese & Pauly 2015), hvoraf tre kendes fra danske farvande. Foruden spidstandet blankesten drejer det sig om rød blankesten (P. erythrinus) og akarnanisk blankesten (P. acarne). I hovedparten af litteraturen fra 1800-tallet og størstedelen af 1900-tallet optræder den spidstandede blankesten imidlertid under navnet Pagellus centrodontus Delaroche, 1809. Genetiske undersøgelser tyder på, at arten er tættest beslægtet med akarnanisk blankesten (Linde et al. 2004). Det officielle danske navn er spidstandet blankesten (Carl et al. 2004) – og det er et navn, der er blevet brugt siden første halvdel af 1800-tallet (Krøyer 1838-40). Navnet er en oversættelse af det tidligere brugte artsnavn ”centrodontus”. I lidt ældre bøger optræder den under navne som almindelig blankesten, rød havrude og spansk blankesten. Ingen af disse bør bruges, og specielt de to førstnævnte er uheldige, da de også er de officielle danske navne for henholdsvis Pagrus pagrus og Dentex gibbosus. Selve navnet blankesten er brugt om havruder helt tilbage i 1700-tallet (Brünnich 1771), og det bruges nu om arter fra fire forskellige slægter.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Ecology of Nassau Grouper at Home Reef Sites: Using Acoustic Telemetry to Track a Large, Long-Lived Epinephelid Across Multiple Years (2005−2008)
    Vol. 655: 199–214, 2020 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published November 26 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13516 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPEN ACCESS Spatial ecology of Nassau grouper at home reef sites: using acoustic telemetry to track a large, long-lived epinephelid across multiple years (2005−2008) Kayla M. Blincow1, Phillippe G. Bush2, Scott A. Heppell3, Croy M. McCoy2, Bradley C. Johnson2, Christy V. Pattengill-Semmens4, Selina S. Heppell3, Sierra J. Stevens-McGeever1, Leslie Whaylen4,5, Kirsten Luke6, Brice X. Semmens1,* 1Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA 2Department of Environment, Cayman Islands Government, Grand Cayman KY1-1002, Cayman Islands 3Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA 4Reef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF), Key Largo, Florida 33037, USA 5Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Galveston, Texas 77551, USA 6Atlantic Coast Joint Venture, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Panama City, Florida 32405, USA ABSTRACT: Characterizing the behavior of coral reef fishes at home reef sites can provide insight into the mechanisms of spatial ecology and provide a framework for spatial resource manage- ment. In the Caribbean, populations of Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus have declined due to fishing impacts on spawning aggregations. Despite local and regional efforts by fisheries man- agers to implement regulations protecting spawning aggregations, few Nassau grouper popula- tions appear to be recovering. In order to improve management strategies for this critically endan- gered species, it is necessary to understand the spatial ecology of the species across seasons and years. In the Cayman Islands, we used a multi-year, presence/absence, depth-coded acoustic tag- ging dataset of Nassau grouper to characterize patterns in the species’ behavior and vertical habi- tat use at home reef sites.
    [Show full text]
  • (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SFSAG Rockall Haddock on Behalf
    MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (16 th March 2015) MEC V1.1 (2nd October 2017) Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SFSAG Rockall haddock On behalf of Scottish Fisheries Sustainable Accreditation Group (SFSAG) Prepared by ME Certification Ltd May 2018 Authors: Dr Hugh Jones Dr Robin Cook Dr Jo Gascoigne Dr Geir Hønneland ME Certification Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington Hampshire SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.me-cert.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (16 th March 2015) MEC V1.1 (2nd October 2017) Contents GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................. 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 6 2 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ................................................................................ 8 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY ....................................................................................... 10 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought ........................... 10 3.1.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) .............................................................. 10 3.1.2 Final UoC(s) .................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Regulation of Lipid Deposition in Blackspot Seabream (Pagellus Bogaraveo )
    Nutritional Regulation of Lipid Deposition in Blackspot Seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo ) Amélia Cláudia Figueiredo Silva Tese de Doutoramente em Ciências do Meio Aquático 2009 Amélia Cláudia Figueiredo Silva Nutritional Regulation of Lipid Deposition in Blackspot Seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo ) Tese de candidatura ao grau de Doutor em Ciências do Meio Aquático submetida ao Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto. Orientador – Profª Doutora Luísa Maria Pinheiro Valente Categoria – Professor Associado Afiliação – Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto Co–orientatador – Doutora Geneviève Corraze Categoria – Investigador Principal/Director Assistente Afiliação – INRA, UMR NuAGe, Station de Recherches en Hydrobiologie, France Amélia Cláudia Figueiredo Silva Nutritional Regulation of Lipid Deposition in Blackspot Seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo ) Thesis for applying to a Doctor degree in Aquatic Enviroment Sciences submitted to the Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar of University of Porto Supervisor – Profª Doutora Luísa Maria Pinheiro Valente Category – Associated Professor Affiliation – Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar of University of Porto Co–supervisor – Doutora Geneviève Corraze Category– Main Researcher /Assistant Director Affiliation – INRA, UMR NuAGe, Station de Recherches en Hydrobiologie, France Directivas Legais No cumprimento do disposto no Decreto-Lei nº 216/92 de 13 de Outubro, declara-se que a autora desta Tese participou na concepção e na execução do trabalho experimental que esteve na origem dos resultados apresentados, bem como na sua interpretação e na redacção dos respectivos manuscritos. Nesta tese inclui-se ainda dois artigos científicos publicados em revistas internacionais resultantes de uma parte dos resultados obtidos no trabalho experimental, referenciado como: Figueiredo-Silva, A.C., Corraze, G., Borges, P., Valente, L.M.P., 2009a.
    [Show full text]