DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlas of North Sea Fishes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlas of North Sea Fishes ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes Based on bottom-trawl survey data for the years 1985—1987 Ruud J. Knijn1, Trevor W. Boon2, Henk J. L. Heessen1, and John R. G. Hislop3 'Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Haringkade 1, PO Box 6 8 , 1970 AB Umuiden, The Netherlands 2MAFF, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, England 3Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8 DB, Scotland Fish illustrations by Peter Stebbing International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2—4, DK-1261 Copenhagen K, Denmark September 1993 Copyright ® 1993 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by photostat or microfilm or stored in a storage system or retrieval system or by any other means without written permission from the authors and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Illustrations ® 1993 Peter Stebbing Published with financial support from the Directorate-General for Fisheries, AIR Programme, of the Commission of the European Communities ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes ISSN 1017-6195 Printed in Denmark Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2. Recruit surveys.................................................................................. 3 2.1 General purpose of the surveys...................................................................... 3 2.2 Surveys used for theA tla s.............................................................................. 4 2.3 Gear and fishing m ethod ................................................................................. 5 2.4 Sampling and measuring ................................................................................ 7 2.5 Time period selected (1985 - 1987) 7 3. Factors affecting the distribution of North Sea fish e s............................................ 8 3.1 Physical environment...................................................................................... 8 3.2 Biological environment................................................................................... 16 3.3 Fisheries............................................................................................................. 16 4. Data presented in the A tlas................... 19 5. Limitations of the data ................................................................................................ 24 6. Accounts of the species caught in the years 1985 - 1987 ...................................... 27 7. Appendix..................................................................................................................... 254 8. Glossary .................................................................................................................... 257 9. Index of fish n a m es.......................................................................................................259 9.1 Scientific names ................................................................................................ 259 9.2 English.............................................................................................................. 261 9.3 French............................................................................................................... 263 9.4 G erm an ............................................................................................................ 264 9.5 D anish ............................................................................................................... 265 9.6 Norwegian ....................................................................................................... 266 9.7 Dutch................................................................................................................. 267 9.8 Sw edish............................................................................................................. 268 Within the text, numbers enclosed in square brackets refer to publications listed at the end of Chapter 5 (page 25) or at the end of the relevant species account. 1. Introduction The information used by fishery biologists for the secondary effects of fishing or changes in the fauna due to assessment of commercial fish stocks originates both changes in the environment. from the fishing industry itself (catch and effort data) and from surveys carried out with research vessels. Over the The Atlas is based on a series of bottom-trawl surveys last two decades these surveys have become an integral carried out in the years 1985 - 1987. Following the part of routine fish stock assessment, and the survey data, introductory chapters, which describe the methods used to which are obtained independently of the commercial collect and process the data and provide relevant fisheries, have become increasingly important in recent information on the biotic and abiotic environment, the years, owing to a general deterioration in the quality of distribution of 98 species or species groups is presented, catch statistics. together with a brief description of their biology. These 98 species (out of the 224 species known to occur in the At present, a great many surveys are conducted in the North Sea) comprise all species caught during the North Sea, mostly under the supervision of the Inter­ surveys. Distribution maps are given for summer and national Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), winter and, for the more abundant species, for juvenile the world's oldest intergovernmental organization con­ and adult fish separately. cerned with marine and fishery science. Typically, survey data are routinely analysed to provide data on distribution, It must be understood that the unit used to illustrate the abundance, maturity, etc. for only a small group of com­ distribution of the different species, i.e. the number mercially exploited fish species. The general procedure caught per hour fishing, is a unit of relative abundance during a survey, however, is to sample at least the size (see also Chapter 5). A bottom trawl will never catch all distribution of all species in the catches. This has resulted the fish in its path and the efficiency of the gear differs in the accumulation of a large body of data which, for the both between and within species. Within these confines, most part, lie neglected in various databases. Few however, the authors hope that the data presented here published data on the distribution of North Sea fishes are will lead to a better understanding of the fishes of the available; these are mainly on commercial species and, North Sea. quite often, only refer to part of the North Sea [e.g. 1,2,3]. It is apparent, however, that the enormous amount Any atlas will undoubtedly have its limitations. The way of information collected during surveys is of value and in which the information is presented here was chosen by may be of considerable interest not only to fisheries the Steering Group. Some users might prefer to have the scientists, but also to a wider public. data available at different levels of aggregation or might wish to add new data, and some people have already The proposal to publish survey data in the form of an expressed their interest in obtaining the A tias data in a atlas was first discussed during the annual Statutory digitized form. These possibilities, however, fell beyond Meeting of ICES in 1988 [4], In 1989 an ICES Study the scope of the present project. Group met for three days to investigate the feasibility of the project [5] and in the same year a Steering Group was Since most of the surveys analysed here are annual formed to organize the necessary work. This Steering events, more data on the distribution of fishes become Group consisted of H.J.L. Heessen (IJmuiden, The available every year. In addition, in 1990 it was agreed Netherlands), J.R.G. Hislop (Aberdeen, United Kingdom), within ICES that there should be more international T.W. Boon (Lowestoft, United Kingdom), and W.L. coordination and standardization of national surveys, and Panhorst (ICES Secretariat). It was originally expected it was decided that for a period of five years starting in that most of the data would be extracted at the ICES 1991, the North Sea, Skagerrak, and Kattegat would be Secretariat, but for logistic reasons the analyses were done surveyed with bottom trawls on a quarterly basis [ 6 ]. This at the fisheries research institutes in IJmuiden and programme, the International Bottom Trawl Survey, Lowestoft. W.L. Panhorst, therefore, only participated in should considerably increase our knowledge of fish the 1989 meeting. In addition to the Steering Group, R.J. distribution and migration, and should eventually form Knijn worked on the Atlas at the IJmuiden Institute the basis of a revised and expanded Atlas of North Sea during most of 1991 (funded by the Dutch Government) Fishes. and 1992 (funded by the Commission of the European Communities, as part of the FAR programme). The Steering Group held two brief meetings (on 7 and 8 May Acknowledgements 1991 in Lowestoft and from 29 April to 1 May 1992 in IJmuiden), but most of the work was done by corres­ Many people have in one way or another contributed to pondence. the realization of this A tlas , and the authors wish to thank them for their cooperation. First of all the crews of The main objective of the Atlas of North Sea Fishes is to the various
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School November 2017 Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Megan E. Hepner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hepner, Megan E., "Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7408 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reef Fish Biodiversity in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary by Megan E. Hepner A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine Science with a concentration in Marine Resource Assessment College of Marine Science University of South Florida Major Professor: Frank Muller-Karger, Ph.D. Christopher Stallings, Ph.D. Steve Gittings, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 31st, 2017 Keywords: Species richness, biodiversity, functional diversity, species traits Copyright © 2017, Megan E. Hepner ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my major advisor, Dr. Frank Muller-Karger, who provided opportunities for me to strengthen my skills as a researcher on research cruises, dive surveys, and in the laboratory, and as a communicator through oral and presentations at conferences, and for encouraging my participation as a full team member in various meetings of the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) and other science meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Present Status of Fish Biodiversity and Abundance in Shiba River, Bangladesh
    Univ. J. zool. Rajshahi. Univ. Vol. 35, 2016, pp. 7-15 ISSN 1023-6104 http://journals.sfu.ca/bd/index.php/UJZRU © Rajshahi University Zoological Society Present status of fish biodiversity and abundance in Shiba river, Bangladesh D.A. Khanom, T Khatun, M.A.S. Jewel*, M.D. Hossain and M.M. Rahman Department of Fisheries, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh Abstract: The study was conducted to investigate the abundance and present status of fish biodiversity in the Shiba river at Tanore Upazila of Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. The study was conducted from November, 2016 to February, 2017. A total of 30 species of fishes were recorded belonging to nine orders, 15 families and 26 genera. Cypriniformes and Siluriformes were the most diversified groups in terms of species. Among 30 species, nine species under the order Cypriniformes, nine species of Siluriformes, five species of Perciformes, two species of Channiformes, two species of Mastacembeliformes, one species of Beloniformes, one species of Clupeiformes, one species of Osteoglossiformes and one species of Decapoda, Crustacea were found. Machrobrachium lamarrei of the family Palaemonidae under Decapoda order was the most dominant species contributing 26.29% of the total catch. In the Shiba river only 6.65% threatened fish species were found, and among them 1.57% were endangered and 4.96% were vulnerable. The mean values of Shannon-Weaver diversity (H), Margalef’s richness (D) and Pielou’s (e) evenness were found as 1.86, 2.22 and 0.74, respectively. Relationship between Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H) and pollution indicates the river as light to moderate polluted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feeding Ecology of Grey Gurnard, Eutrigla Gurnardus, Off the Coast of Scotland
    The Feeding Ecology of Grey Gurnard, Eutrigla gurnardus, off the coast of Scotland. Abstract Until recently, little research had been conducted into the feeding ecology of grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus), and the species’ wider interaction with the ecosystems it inhabits. This study was carried out to address several questions that have recently arisen about the species. Mainly whether the grey gurnard population at Rockall Bank have been predating on the juvenile haddock to a degree that could cause the stock to decline. This was assessed by conducting a stomach contents analysis on a sample of grey gurnard caught on several trawls. The results of this were inconclusive, with only 3 stomachs containing potential haddock remains out of a total of 121 stomachs. However, these results do not completely disprove the hypothesis, as other factors may have influenced the low fish intake in these gurnard. Furthermore, the populations of grey gurnard from Rockall Bank and the Firth of Forth were compared to determine any differences in feeding ecology between the two. It emerged that the two populations were reasonably similar, with smaller size classes consuming less fish and proportionally more invertebrates, while larger size classes had a diet that was predominantly fish, with the fish prey consisting largely of sand eels. Finally, the influence of fish size on prey selection was investigated, with the result showing a clear correlation between increasing fish size and increasing prey mass, likely owing to the greater amount of fish prey that makes up a larger gurnard’s diet. Introduction: Grey gurnard, Eutrigla gurnadus, is a demersal marine species that has a wide distribution throughout the North Atlantic and the North Sea (Vinogradov et al., 2014; Floeter et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Red Gurnard in the North East Atlantic, Demersal Otter Trawl
    Red gurnard in the North East Atlantic, Demersal otter trawl Red gurnard in the North East Atlantic, Demersal otter trawl Content last updated 27th Jan 2016 Stock: Red gurnard in the North East Atlantic Management: EU Overview Red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus) is a widespread demersal species on the Northeast Atlantic shelf, distributed from South Norway and north of the British Isles to Mauritania. The species is found in depths between 20 and 250m living on gravel or coarse sandy substrate. Higher occurrences of red gurnard with patchy distribution have been observed along the Western approaches from the Shetlands Islands to the Celtic Seas and the Channel. A continuous distribution of fish crossing the Channel and the area West of Brittany does not suggest a separation of the Divisions VIId from VIIe and VIIh. Therefore a split of the population between the Ecoregions does not seem appropriate. Further investigations are needed to progress on stocks boundaries such as morphometric studies, tagging and genetic population studies. Red gurnard feeds on a variety of small invertebrates, bottom dwelling fish and benthic shellfish and crustaceans. Length at first maturity has been reported at approximately 25cm. Spawning occurs between February and June. Currently, all red gurnards in the Northeast Atlantic are treated as a single stock. Considering their behaviour, future assessment and management should identify and treat separate spawning aggregations independently. Red gurnard is mainly taken as a bycatch in mixed demersal fisheries for flatfish and roundfish, as the market is limited a larger part of the gurnard catch is discarded. Gurnards have been landed as a mixed generic gurnard catch and therefore landings of red gurnard are uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions
    Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/
    [Show full text]
  • HELCOM Red List
    SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Trachinus draco English name: Scientific name: Greater weever Trachinus draco Taxonomical group: Species authority: Class: Actinopterygii Linnaeus, 1758 Order: Perciformes Family: Trachinidae Subspecies, Variations, Synonyms: Generation length: – Past and current threats (Habitats Directive Future threats (Habitats Directive article 17 article 17 codes): – codes): – IUCN Criteria: HELCOM Red List LC – Category: Least Concern Global / European IUCN Red List Category Habitats Directive: NE/NE – Previous HELCOM Red List Category (2007): VU Protection and Red List status in HELCOM countries: Denmark –/–, Estonia –/–, Finland –/–, Germany –/* (Not threatened, Baltic Sea), Latvia –/–, Lithuania –/–, Poland –/–, Russia –/–, Sweden –/LC Distribution and status in the Baltic Sea region The greater weever is a marine species commonly occurring and reproducing in Kattegat, the Belt Seas and the Sound. It is occasionally found also in southern Baltic Sea but it is not reproducing there. Both monitoring data and commercial landings from the last decades show a positive trend in the HELCOM area. Greater weaver. Photo: Timo Moritz, Deutches Meeresmuseum. © HELCOM Red List Fish and Lamprey Species Expert Group 2013 www.helcom.fi > Baltic Sea trends > Biodiversity > Red List of species SPECIES INFORMATION SHEET Trachinus draco Fig.1 Catch per unit effort (number per trawling hour) of greater weever in international bottom trawl surveys in Kattegat (IBTS) during third quarter of the year (Linear fit and correlation coefficient
    [Show full text]
  • 04-Bailly 669.Indd
    Scophthalmus Rafinesque, 1810: The valid generic name for the turbot, S. maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) [Pleuronectiformes: Scophthalmidae] by Nicolas BAILLY* (1) & Bruno CHANET (2) ABSTRACT. - In the past 50 years, the turbot is referred to either as Scophthalmus maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) or Psetta maxima (Linnaeus, 1758) in the literature. Norman (1931) had argued that the valid name for the turbot was Scophthalmus maximus. However, his recommendation was never universally accepted, and today the confusing situation exists where two generic names are still being used for this species. We address this issue by analysing findings from recently published works on the anatomy, molecular and morphological phylogenetic systematics, and ecology of scophthalmid fishes. The preponderance of evidence supports the strong recommendation to use Scophthalmus as the valid generic name for the tur- bot. Acceptance of this generic name conveys the best information available concerning the systematic relationships of this species, and also serves to simplify the nomenclature of scophthalmid flatfishes in publications on systematics, fisheries and aquaculture, fishery statistics, ichthyofaunal and field guides for the general public, and in various legal and conserva- tion-related documents. This paper reinforces the conclusions of Chanet (2003) with more arguments. RÉSUMÉ. - Scophthalmus Rafinesque, 1810: le nom de genre valide du turbot,S. maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pleuronecti- formes: Scophthalmidae). Depuis 50 ans, le turbot est dénommé dans la littérature soit Scophthalmus maximus (Linnaeus, 1758), soit Psetta maxima (Linnaeus, 1758). Norman (1931) avait montré que le nom valide pour le turbot était Scophthalmus maximus. Cependant, sa recommandation ne fut jamais universellement appliquée, et aujourd’hui la situation reste confuse avec deux noms génériques en usage pour cette espèce.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Choice of Different Size Classes of Flounder (Platichthys Flesus ) In
    Food choice of different size classes of flounder ( Platichthys flesus ) in the Baltic Sea Jennie Ljungberg Degree project in biology, Master of science (2 years), 2014 Examensarbete i biologi 30 hp till masterexamen, 2014 Biology Education Centre Supervisor: Bertil Widbom Table of Contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 4 Flounders in the Baltic Sea .................................................................................................................. 5 The diet of flounders ........................................................................................................................... 6 Blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) ............................................................................................................... 7 Blue mussels in the Baltic Sea............................................................................................................. 8 The nutritive value of blue mussels ..................................................................................................... 9 The condition of flounders in the Baltic Sea ....................................................................................... 9 Aims .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Reticulated Dragonet, Callionymus Reticulatus
    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2017) 47 (2): 163–171 DOI: 10.3750/AIEP/02098 FIRST RECORD OF THE RETICULATED DRAGONET, CALLIONYMUS RETICULATUS VALENCIENNES, 1837 (ACTINOPTERYGII: CALLIONYMIFORMES: CALLIONYMIDAE), FROM THE BALEARIC ISLANDS, WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN Ronald FRICKE1* and Francesc ORDINES2 1Lauda-Königshofen, Germany 2Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Fricke R., Ordines F. 2017. First record of the reticulated dragonet, Callionymus reticulatus Valenciennes, 1837 (Actinopterygii: Callionymiformes: Callionymidae), from the Balearic Islands, western Mediterranean. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 47 (2): 163–171. Background. The reticulated dragonet, Callionymus reticulatus, was originally described based on a single specimen, the holotype from Malaga, Spain, south-western Mediterranean, probably collected before 1831. The holotype is now disintegrated; the specific characteristics are no longer discernible. The species was subsequently recorded from several north-eastern Atlantic localities (Western Sahara to central Norway), but missing in the Mediterranean. Material and methods. Specimens of C. reticulatus were observed and collected during two cruises in 2014 and 2016 in the Balearic Islands off Mallorca and Menorca. The collected specimens (8 females) have been deposited in the collection of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJ). All individuals of C. reticulatus were collected from beam trawl samples carried out during the DRAGONSAL0914 in September 2014, and during the MEDITS_ES05_16 bottom trawl survey in June 2016, on shelf and slope bottoms around the Balearic Islands. Both surveys used a ‘Jennings’ beam trawl to sample the epi-benthic communities, which was the main objective of the DRAGONSAL0914 and a complementary objective in the MEDITS_ES05_16. The ‘Jennings’ beam trawl has a 2 m horizontal opening, 0.5 m vertical opening and a 5 mm diamond mesh in the codend.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet Composition of Cod (Gadus Morhua): Small-Scale Differences in a Sub-Arctic Fjord
    Diet composition of cod (Gadus morhua): small-scale differences in a sub-arctic fjord Enoksen, Siri Elise BI309F MSc IN MARINE ECOLOGY Faculty for Biosciences and Aquaculture May 2015 Acknowledgements The presented thesis is the final part of a two-year Master of Science program at the Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Bodø, Norway. I owe my supervisor Associate Professor Henning Reiss eternal gratitude for his patience and all the help with sampling, species determination and writing of this thesis. Without his expertise and guidance, this master thesis would not have been possible. A special thanks to Bjørn Tore Zahl at Saltstraumen Brygge, Geir Jøran Nyheim at Saltstraumen camping, Lill-Anita Stenersen at Kafe Kjelen, Fauske Båtforening and Saltdal Båtforening for helping during sampling, Coop Extra Bygg Fauske for sponsoring sheds for collecting stations, and to all anglers who handed inn samples. This project would not have been possible without their help. I would like to thank Professor Truls Moum, Martina Kopp, Vigdis Edvardsen, Tor Erik Jørgensen and Teshome Tilahun Bizuayehu for help and guidance during DNA barcoding analysis. I thank Nina Tande Hansen and Bibbi Myrvoll at Karrieresenteret Indre Salten for believing in me and convincing me that I was capable of studying at university level. This thesis would not have been possible without their guidance. I would also like to thank my family for their patience during the five years of fulfilling my Master. i Table of contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee
    Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories Compiled by S. Oldfield Edited by D. Procter and L.V. Fleming ISBN: 1 86107 502 2 © Copyright Joint Nature Conservation Committee 1999 Illustrations and layout by Barry Larking Cover design Tracey Weeks Printed by CLE Citation. Procter, D., & Fleming, L.V., eds. 1999. Biodiversity: the UK Overseas Territories. Peterborough, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Disclaimer: reference to legislation and convention texts in this document are correct to the best of our knowledge but must not be taken to infer definitive legal obligation. Cover photographs Front cover: Top right: Southern rockhopper penguin Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome (Richard White/JNCC). The world’s largest concentrations of southern rockhopper penguin are found on the Falkland Islands. Centre left: Down Rope, Pitcairn Island, South Pacific (Deborah Procter/JNCC). The introduced rat population of Pitcairn Island has successfully been eradicated in a programme funded by the UK Government. Centre right: Male Anegada rock iguana Cyclura pinguis (Glen Gerber/FFI). The Anegada rock iguana has been the subject of a successful breeding and re-introduction programme funded by FCO and FFI in collaboration with the National Parks Trust of the British Virgin Islands. Back cover: Black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris (Richard White/JNCC). Of the global breeding population of black-browed albatross, 80 % is found on the Falkland Islands and 10% on South Georgia. Background image on front and back cover: Shoal of fish (Charles Sheppard/Warwick
    [Show full text]
  • Scenario Calculations of Mercury Exposure
    VKM Report 2019:3 Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment Report from the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) 2019:3 Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 05.04.2019 ISBN: 978-82-8259-319-9 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 4404 Nydalen N – 0403 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Cover photo: Colourbox Suggested citation: VKM, Heidi Amlund, Kirsten Eline Rakkestad, Anders Ruus, Jostein Starrfelt, Jonny Beyer, Anne Lise Brantsæter, Sara Bremer, Gunnar Sundstøl Eriksen, Espen Mariussen, Ingunn Anita Samdal, Cathrine Thomsen and Helle Katrine Knutsen (2019). Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations. Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment. VKM report 2019:3, ISBN: 978-82-8259-319-9, ISSN: 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. Scenario calculations of mercury exposure from fish and overview of species with high mercury concentrations Preparation of the opinion The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) appointed a project group to answer the request from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. The project group consisted of three VKM-members, and three employees, including a project leader, from the VKM secretariat.
    [Show full text]