Status of Southern Garfish in the Perth Region in 2010-2011 (Figure 1) and the Proportion of Fish Aged More Than Two Years Fell from 30 % to Less Than 5%

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status of Southern Garfish in the Perth Region in 2010-2011 (Figure 1) and the Proportion of Fish Aged More Than Two Years Fell from 30 % to Less Than 5% Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Newsletter No. 36 October 2017 Welcome to the RAP Newsletter, providing feedback on the data you are collecting and keeping you informed about what is happening at the Fisheries Division of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. Status of southern garfish in the Perth region in 2010-2011 (Figure 1) and the proportion of fish aged more than two years fell from 30 % to less than 5%. The average length also declined. Considering the maximum reported age of 10 years for this species, the age structure of the Cockburn Sound stock in 2010-2011 was heavily ‘truncated’ Photo 1: Southern garfish. (i.e. older fish were absent from the In June 2017, the Perth metropolitan Cockburn Sound was in relatively population). area was closed to both recreational good condition. But, soon after this and commercial fishing for southern study was completed, the abundance 60% garfish (Hyporhamphus melanochir) of garfish began a steady decline. In 50% to help the local population recover. response to this decline we began 40% n=294 We would like to thank those of you a major assessment of the stock in 30% who have been assisting us to monitor mid-2009. Most of our biological 20% 10% garfish by donating fish or recording sampling to determine age/length/sex Percent frequency logbook data. Your data is essential to composition of fishery landings was 0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 our assessments. done in 2010-2011. We then spent Age (years) Fisheries Research Report 271 many hours in the lab trying to age the contains the results of our first garfish fish using the otoliths we had collected. stock assessment, completed in This was a challenge because garfish 60 2014 (http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/ otoliths are quite difficult to interpret, n=480 40 Documents/research_reports/frr271. although we eventually got the hang of it! pdf). Our assessments have been 20 updated annually since 2014 and the Proportion (%) latest findings are published in the 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 State of the Fisheries Report each Age (years) year. Here is a quick summary of our latest assessment. Figure 1. The age structure of southern garfish in Cockburn Sound in 1998 Slow decline since the late (previous study) (top) compared to 2009-2011 (bottom), showing the 1990s disappearance of older fish and Cockburn Sound has traditionally been a decline in the average age. Note: the Photo 2: Garfish egg found in Cockburn maximum age recorded for southern the main fishery for southern garfish Sound. Filaments used to attach the egg garfish is 10 years. in the West Coast Bioregion (WCB). to marine vegetation are clearly visible. About 80% of commercial landings and Garfish eggs are relatively large (3 mm The age data was used to estimate the 50% of recreational landings of this diameter). Photo: Jan Richards ‘instantaneous rate of total mortality’ species in the WCB have been taken in (Z) acting on the stock in 1998-1999 Cockburn Sound. We found the typical (most common) and 2010-2011. Z is equal to the age of garfish had declined, from sum of fishing mortality (F) plus natural A previous study in 1998-1999 two years in 1998-1999 to one year suggested the garfish population in mortality (M), i.e. Z = F + M. Continued on page 2 Continued from page 1 Garfish biology Southern garfish occurs across southern Z was estimated to be 0.90 per And then the heatwave Australia, including WA (Kalbarri year in 1998-1999 and 1.57 per struck…. southwards), SA, Victoria and Tasmania. year in 2010-2011 which, in non- It reaches a maximum length of 49 cm After our biological sampling in technical terms, means there was an and can live 10 years. Although this 2010-2011, we continued to annual survivorship (S) of 41% and species grows rapidly and attains maturity monitor catches and catch rates of 21%, respectively. Compared to the at a relatively young age (about a year), garfish in Cockburn Sound and the rate of survivorship experienced by it has some biological traits that make it broader Perth area. Commercial garfish ‘naturally’ (i.e. in an unfished relatively vulnerable to overfishing: population), which is 64% per year and recreational catch rates fell (Z = 0.44), the total mortality in sharply in 2012, and have remained Low fecundity: A female may spawn 2010-2011 was extremely high. at historically low levels since multiple batches of eggs during spring This suggested that fishing pressure (Figure 3). Overall trends suggest a and early summer. Batch fecundity in Cockburn Sound increased very substantial (perhaps 70-90%) increases with size, ranging from about substantially between 1998-1999 reduction in garfish abundance in 100 eggs per batch for a small (22 cm) and 2010-2011, resulting in a 50% this area since the late 1990s. female to about 4,000 eggs per batch decline in survivorship. Recruitment failure during the for a large (40 cm) female. This is a low ‘heatwave’ event in summer 2010/11 level of egg production compared to many In our assessments, we tend to focus appeared to have caused the other fish species, which can produce on the rate of fishing mortality (F), dramatic decline in catches between tens of thousands or millions of eggs. rather than Z or M, because this is 2011 and 2012. Low fecundity limits how fast a garfish the factor that we actively manage population can recover from depletion. catch rate (fish/hour) rate catch (i.e. we can adjust catch and/or 0.6 Recreational commercial Small populations: In each region, fishing effort which will alter F, but 200 recreational 0.4 we can’t change natural mortality). southern garfish occur as multiple, 100 0.2 small, sub-populations. For example, In 2010-2011, the estimated F Commercial substantially exceeded the limit (kg/day) rate catch Cockburn Sound is believed to host its 0 0.0 reference point for this stock (Figure own sub-population. In SA, researchers 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 have found discrete (non-mixing) garfish 2). This level of fishing pressure is Year populations less than 60 km apart. This considered unsustainable. Figure 3: Annual commercial catch rate situation arises because garfish have (standardised) and recreational catch limited dispersal. Small populations are 1.5 rate of southern garfish in Perth area from 1996 to 2016, indicating a large more vulnerable to depletion (by fishing or decline in abundance since the late natural factors) than larger populations. 1.0 1990s, and very low abundance since Limited dispersal: Garfish eggs attach 2011. The recreational catch rate is to seagrass or other aquatic vegetation Flimit calculated from RAP logbook data, only 0.5 available from 2006 onwards (Note: via filaments on the egg (see Photo 2). Fthreshold Fishing mortality(F) Ftarget the commercial fishery voluntarily The larval stage is completed inside the ceased targeting garfish in 2016). egg, and they hatch as tiny juveniles 0.0 Female Male Both (~7 mm). Due to the attached eggs, and In summary, our assessment absence of a planktonic larval stage, there Figure 2: Rate of fishing mortality (F) indicates that the garfish stock in is no dispersal during these early stages. for southern garfish in Cockburn Cockburn Sound had been declining Juveniles and adults tend to remain Sound in 2010-2011, estimated since the late 1990s, mainly due using the age structure of males, associated with seagrass habitat too, females and both sexes combined. to an unsustainable level of fishing and so an individual fish might spend its Note: each F estimate, including pressure (both commercial and entire lifetime within the same seagrass 95 per cent confidence interval, recreational). The very depleted state bed. Limited dispersal means little mixing is well above the limit reference of the stock made it vulnerable to between populations. If a local garfish level for this species, indicating collapse after poor recruitment during population is depleted, it may take a an unacceptable level of fishing the ‘marine heatwave’. Five years pressure. Differences in F suggest long time to recover because it will not male garfish experience a slightly later garfish abundance remained be replenished by fish arriving from other higher rate of mortality than females. extremely low in the Perth area, and stocks. there was no sign of stock recovery. Dependency on seagrass habitat: These findings were consistent with This indicated that management Southern garfish are considered another part of the assessment which intervention was required to help this ‘seagrass-dependent’ because seagrass estimated that the spawning stock stock recover. With a fishing ban now forms a significant part of their diet and biomass of garfish had been greatly in place, we will continue to monitor their eggs must attach to seagrass (or reduced, to around 20% of the ‘virgin’ garfish over the next few years to similar vegetation) to survive. Garfish (unfished) level in 2010-2011. detect signs of recovery. generally live near seagrass or other marine vegetation all their lives. Seagrass habitat is threatened by human activities (such as dredging, water pollution) in many areas including Cockburn Sound. Blue groper attitude Jeff Norriss The recreational fishing community on WA’s south coast has a protective attitude toward the western blue groper that live along the coastline. Some southerners reckon there is something different about blue groper that makes them inherently vulnerable and, as a result, fishing for blue groper is not encouraged. So what is different about blue groper, compared to the average fish? Growing to 40 kg, blue perhaps due to fishing, one of the local females responds groper is southern Australia’s by changing sex to replace him.
Recommended publications
  • Present Status of Fish Biodiversity and Abundance in Shiba River, Bangladesh
    Univ. J. zool. Rajshahi. Univ. Vol. 35, 2016, pp. 7-15 ISSN 1023-6104 http://journals.sfu.ca/bd/index.php/UJZRU © Rajshahi University Zoological Society Present status of fish biodiversity and abundance in Shiba river, Bangladesh D.A. Khanom, T Khatun, M.A.S. Jewel*, M.D. Hossain and M.M. Rahman Department of Fisheries, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh Abstract: The study was conducted to investigate the abundance and present status of fish biodiversity in the Shiba river at Tanore Upazila of Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. The study was conducted from November, 2016 to February, 2017. A total of 30 species of fishes were recorded belonging to nine orders, 15 families and 26 genera. Cypriniformes and Siluriformes were the most diversified groups in terms of species. Among 30 species, nine species under the order Cypriniformes, nine species of Siluriformes, five species of Perciformes, two species of Channiformes, two species of Mastacembeliformes, one species of Beloniformes, one species of Clupeiformes, one species of Osteoglossiformes and one species of Decapoda, Crustacea were found. Machrobrachium lamarrei of the family Palaemonidae under Decapoda order was the most dominant species contributing 26.29% of the total catch. In the Shiba river only 6.65% threatened fish species were found, and among them 1.57% were endangered and 4.96% were vulnerable. The mean values of Shannon-Weaver diversity (H), Margalef’s richness (D) and Pielou’s (e) evenness were found as 1.86, 2.22 and 0.74, respectively. Relationship between Shannon-Weaver diversity index (H) and pollution indicates the river as light to moderate polluted.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fish Conservation Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions
    Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca0 K. Smith & William J. Sutherland CONSERVATION EVIDENCE SERIES SYNOPSES Marine Fish Conservation Global evidence for the effects of selected interventions Natasha Taylor, Leo J. Clarke, Khatija Alliji, Chris Barrett, Rosslyn McIntyre, Rebecca K. Smith and William J. Sutherland Conservation Evidence Series Synopses 1 Copyright © 2021 William J. Sutherland This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work providing attribution is made to the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Taylor, N., Clarke, L.J., Alliji, K., Barrett, C., McIntyre, R., Smith, R.K., and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine Fish Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Selected Interventions. Synopses of Conservation Evidence Series. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Further details about CC BY licenses are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image: Circling fish in the waters of the Halmahera Sea (Pacific Ocean) off the Raja Ampat Islands, Indonesia, by Leslie Burkhalter. Digital material and resources associated with this synopsis are available at https://www.conservationevidence.com/
    [Show full text]
  • SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge
    ISSN 1025-7497 Secretariat of the Pacific Community TRADITIONAL Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Number 18 — August 2005 INFORMATION BULLETIN Group Coordinator and Bulletin Editor: Kenneth Ruddle, Katsuragi 2-24-20, Kita-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo-ken 651-1223, Japan; Email: [email protected] — Production: Information Section, Marine Resources Division, SPC, BP D5, 98848 Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia. Fax: +687 263818; Email: [email protected]. The bulletin is also available at: http://www.spc.int/coastfish — Produced with financial assistance from France. Editor’s note We include three articles in this edition. In the first, “Fishing for drummerfish (Kyphosidae) with termites and spider webs Inside on the weather coast of Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands”, William T. Atu describes a unique traditional fishing method this issue known as bulukochi, which was used by his forefathers to catch drummerfish. This fishing method is on the verge of disap- pearing, and the only person who knows about it and the asso- ciated customs is Mr Atu’s elderly uncle. So Mr Atu decided to Fishing for drummerfish preserve some of this information here, because, as he says (Kyphosidae) with termites and “With the passing of my uncle the techniques and intricate spider webs on the weather coast customs associated with this method will be lost forever”. of Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands William T. Atu p. 3 William T. Atu has set a wonderful example. We hope it will stimulate other people to set about documenting “endangered Indigenous ecological knowledge information” in their own communities. This Information (IEK) of the aggregating and Bulletin would be delighted to publish such material.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Louisiana Recreational Fishing Regulations
    2021 LOUISIANA RECREATIONAL FISHING REGULATIONS www.wlf.louisiana.gov 1 Get a GEICO quote for your boat and, in just 15 minutes, you’ll know how much you could be saving. If you like what you hear, you can buy your policy right on the spot. Then let us do the rest while you enjoy your free time with peace of mind. geico.com/boat | 1-800-865-4846 Some discounts, coverages, payment plans, and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. In the state of CA, program provided through Boat Association Insurance Services, license #0H87086. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2020 GEICO CONTENTS 6. LICENSING 9. DEFINITIONS DON’T 11. GENERAL FISHING INFORMATION General Regulations.............................................11 Saltwater/Freshwater Line...................................12 LITTER 13. FRESHWATER FISHING SPORTSMEN ARE REMINDED TO: General Information.............................................13 • Clean out truck beds and refrain from throwing Freshwater State Creel & Size Limits....................16 cigarette butts or other trash out of the car or watercraft. 18. SALTWATER FISHING • Carry a trash bag in your car or boat. General Information.............................................18 • Securely cover trash containers to prevent Saltwater State Creel & Size Limits.......................21 animals from spreading litter. 26. OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES Call the state’s “Litterbug Hotline” to report any Recreational Shrimping........................................26 potential littering violations including dumpsites Recreational Oystering.........................................27 and littering in public. Those convicted of littering Recreational Crabbing..........................................28 Recreational Crawfishing......................................29 face hefty fines and litter abatement work.
    [Show full text]
  • Garfish (Gar) 1. Fishery Summary
    GARFISH (GAR) GARFISH (GAR) (Hyporhamphus ihi) Takeke 1. FISHERY SUMMARY Garfish was introduced into the QMS from 1 October 2002 with allowances, TACCs and TACs (Table 1). These have not changed. Table 1: Recreational and Customary non-commercial allowances, TACCs and TACs (t) of garfish by Fishstock. Fishstock Recreational Allowance Customary Non-Commercial Allowance TACC TAC GAR 1 20 10 25 55 GAR 2 8 4 5 17 GAR 3 2 1 5 8 GAR 4 1 1 2 4 GAR 7 10 5 8 23 GAR 8 8 4 5 17 GAR 10 0 0 0 0 1.1 Commercial fisheries Garfish landings were first recorded in 1933, and a minor fishery must have existed before this. Moderate quantities of garfish can be readily caught by experienced fishers, it is a desirable food fish, and informal sales at beaches or from wharves are likely to have been made from the late 1800s onwards. Reported landings to 1990 almost certainly understate the actual “commercial” catch. Table 2: Reported total New Zealand landings (t) of garfish from 1931 to 1990. Year Landings Year Landings Year Landings Year Landings Year Landing Year Landing 1931 − 1941 1 1951 4 1961 3 1971 11 1981 7 1932 − 1942 1 1952 7 1962 4 1972 4 1982 11 1933 1 1943 1 1953 6 1963 4 1973 10 1983 12 1934 − 1944 2 1954 8 1964 2 1974 6 1984 13 1935 − 1945 9 1955 9 1965 2 1975 2 1975 8 1936 − 1946 3 1956 7 1966 3 1976 5 1986 14 1937 − 1947 2 1957 2 1967 4 1977 5 1987 36 1938 − 1948 1 1958 2 1968 3 1978 15 1988 20 1939 4 1949 6 1959 4 1969 5 1979 12 1989 15 1940 6 1950 2 1960 6 1970 13 1980 12 1990 24 Source: Annual Reports on Fisheries (Marine Department/Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries) to 1974, and subsequent MAF data.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of North Sea Fishes
    ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes Based on bottom-trawl survey data for the years 1985—1987 Ruud J. Knijn1, Trevor W. Boon2, Henk J. L. Heessen1, and John R. G. Hislop3 'Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Haringkade 1, PO Box 6 8 , 1970 AB Umuiden, The Netherlands 2MAFF, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, England 3Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8 DB, Scotland Fish illustrations by Peter Stebbing International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2—4, DK-1261 Copenhagen K, Denmark September 1993 Copyright ® 1993 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by photostat or microfilm or stored in a storage system or retrieval system or by any other means without written permission from the authors and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Illustrations ® 1993 Peter Stebbing Published with financial support from the Directorate-General for Fisheries, AIR Programme, of the Commission of the European Communities ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes ISSN 1017-6195 Printed in Denmark Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2. Recruit surveys.................................................................................. 3 2.1 General purpose of the surveys.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Fish Species in Nat Min Chaung In, Singu Township
    Diversity of Fish Species in Nat Min Chaung In, Singu Township Cho Sin Win1, Than Htwe2, Thant Zin3 Abstract The study was carried out in Nat Min Chaung In from July, 2015 to January 2016 to evaluate the species richness and diversity of fish fauna related to water physiochemical parameters. Collection of data was performed bimonthly. Data were analyzed by Margalef (1958), Simpson (1949), Shannon-Wiener (1949) and Hill (1973). A total of 39 species belonging to 27 genera, 16 families and eight orders were recorded in the study area. The order Cypriniformes (38.46%) was found to be the highest inspecies composition. Among the species recorded, Corica soborna was dominant species. The value of Marglef's richness index, d (3.8165) was the highest in August. The values of Simposon's index D (0.0815), Shannon-Weiner's index H' (2.7879), Hill diversity indices N1 (16.0995), N2 (12.2727) were recorded during November. The highest evenness value E (0.8046) was found in January. According to the value of physiochemical parameter of water in the study area, the maximum depth of water 13.5 m in July and the minimum 4.5 m in January were found. The highest value of water temperature (32.5°C) was observed in July and the lowest value of water temperature (21.4°C) was recorded in December. pH ranged from 7.4 in August to 8.2 in November. Dissolved oxygen ranged from 3.8 mg/L in September to 6.8 mg/L in November. The monthly variation of physiochemical parameters of water quality in the study area directly influenced on the composition, richness and diversity of fish fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes
    Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes Written and Designed by Prosanta Chakrabarty, Ph.D., Sophie Warny, Ph.D., and Valerie Derouen LSU Museum of Natural Science To those young people still discovering their love of nature... Note to parents, teachers, instructors, activity coordinators and to all the fishermen in us: This book is a companion piece to Making a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes, an exhibit at Louisiana State Universi- ty’s Museum of Natural Science (MNS). Located in Foster Hall on the main campus of LSU, this exhibit created in 2012 contains many of the elements discussed in this book. The MNS exhibit hall is open weekdays, from 8 am to 4 pm, when the LSU campus is open. The MNS visits are free of charge, but call our main office at 225-578-2855 to schedule a visit if your group includes 10 or more students. Of course the book can also be enjoyed on its own and we hope that you will enjoy it on your own or with your children or students. The book and exhibit was funded by the Louisiana Board Of Regents, Traditional Enhancement Grant - Education: Mak- ing a Big Splash with Louisiana Fishes: A Three-tiered Education Program and Museum Exhibit. Funding was obtained by LSUMNS Curators’ Sophie Warny and Prosanta Chakrabarty who designed the exhibit with Southwest Museum Services who built it in 2012. The oarfish in the exhibit was created by Carolyn Thome of the Smithsonian, and images exhibited here are from Curator Chakrabarty unless noted elsewhere (see Appendix II).
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Species Management Plan for Alligator Gar (Atractosteus Spatula) in Illinois
    Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Fish Species Management Plan for Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) in Illinois The last vouchered Alligator Gar collected in Illinois waters (Cache-Mississippi R Diversion Channel - 1966) Courtesy of Brooks Burr Fish Species Management Plan for Alligator Gar (Atractosteus spatula) in Illinois April, 2017 Rob Hilsabeck District 4 Fisheries Biologist Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Trent Thomas Region III Streams Biologist Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Nathan Grider Impact Assessment Section Biologist Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Realty and Environmental Planning Division of Ecosystems and Environment Michael McClelland Rivers, Reservoirs, and Inland Waters Program Manager Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries Dan Stephenson Chief of Fisheries Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation Division of Fisheries ii Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………….………...............…………1 Historical Distribution……………..………………….…………...............……..1 Life History and Ecological Information…….……....………................…...…...2 Characteristics……………………………….………...............…………2 Diet ………………………………………….………...............…………3 Reproduction ……………………….……….………...............…………3 Causes of Decline………………………………………….................…………..3
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Fishing Guide 2021
    Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Recreational fishing guide 2021 New rules apply from 1 July 2021 see page 3 for details Includes Statewide bag and size limits for Western Australia, and Recreational Fishing from Boat Licence information Published June 2021 Page i Important disclaimer The Director General of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. This publication is to provide assistance or information. It is only a guide and does not replace the Fish Resources Management Act 1994 or the Fish Resources Management Regulations 1995. It cannot be used as a defence in a court of law. The information provided is current at the date of printing but may be subject to change. For the most up-to-date information on fishing and full details of legislation contact select DPIRD offices or visit dpird.wa.gov.au Copyright © State of Western Australia (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development) 2021 Front cover photo: Tourism WA Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Gordon Stephenson House, 140 William Street, Perth WA 6000 +61 1300 374 731 [email protected] dpird.wa.gov.au Page ii Contents Fish for the future .............................................2 Using this guide .................................................2 Changes to the rules – 2021 .............................3
    [Show full text]
  • The Living Planet Index (Lpi) for Migratory Freshwater Fish Technical Report
    THE LIVING PLANET INDEX (LPI) FOR MIGRATORY FRESHWATER FISH LIVING PLANET INDEX TECHNICAL1 REPORT LIVING PLANET INDEXTECHNICAL REPORT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are very grateful to a number of individuals and organisations who have worked with the LPD and/or shared their data. A full list of all partners and collaborators can be found on the LPI website. 2 INDEX TABLE OF CONTENTS Stefanie Deinet1, Kate Scott-Gatty1, Hannah Rotton1, PREFERRED CITATION 2 1 1 Deinet, S., Scott-Gatty, K., Rotton, H., Twardek, W. M., William M. Twardek , Valentina Marconi , Louise McRae , 5 GLOSSARY Lee J. Baumgartner3, Kerry Brink4, Julie E. Claussen5, Marconi, V., McRae, L., Baumgartner, L. J., Brink, K., Steven J. Cooke2, William Darwall6, Britas Klemens Claussen, J. E., Cooke, S. J., Darwall, W., Eriksson, B. K., Garcia Eriksson7, Carlos Garcia de Leaniz8, Zeb Hogan9, Joshua de Leaniz, C., Hogan, Z., Royte, J., Silva, L. G. M., Thieme, 6 SUMMARY 10 11, 12 13 M. L., Tickner, D., Waldman, J., Wanningen, H., Weyl, O. L. Royte , Luiz G. M. Silva , Michele L. Thieme , David Tickner14, John Waldman15, 16, Herman Wanningen4, Olaf F., Berkhuysen, A. (2020) The Living Planet Index (LPI) for 8 INTRODUCTION L. F. Weyl17, 18 , and Arjan Berkhuysen4 migratory freshwater fish - Technical Report. World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands. 1 Indicators & Assessments Unit, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society 11 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION of London, United Kingdom Edited by Mark van Heukelum 11 Data set 2 Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Design Shapeshifter.nl Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Drawings Jeroen Helmer 12 Global trend Ottawa, ON, Canada 15 Tropical and temperate zones 3 Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Photography We gratefully acknowledge all of the 17 Regions New South Wales, Australia photographers who gave us permission 20 Migration categories 4 World Fish Migration Foundation, The Netherlands to use their photographic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms Underlying Spectral Sensitivity in Teleost Fishes Karen L
    © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2020) 223, jeb193334. doi:10.1242/jeb.193334 REVIEW Seeing the rainbow: mechanisms underlying spectral sensitivity in teleost fishes Karen L. Carleton1,*, Daniel Escobar-Camacho1, Sara M. Stieb2,3,4, Fabio Cortesi4 and N. Justin Marshall4 ABSTRACT thespectrumandoftenworkinanopponentmannertoprovidecolor Among vertebrates, teleost eye diversity exceeds that found in all vision (although in some instances rods may contribute to chromatic other groups. Their spectral sensitivities range from ultraviolet to red, tasks; Joesch and Meister, 2016). and the number of visual pigments varies from 1 to over 40. This Vision helps animals navigate through the environment, find food, variation is correlated with the different ecologies and life histories of avoid predators and find mates (Cronin et al., 2014). In an organism fish species, including their variable aquatic habitats: murky lakes, with a fixed number of visual channels, each visual task may be clear oceans, deep seas and turbulent rivers. These ecotopes often optimized by a different set of visual sensitivities. For a single change with the season, but fish may also migrate between ecotopes species, natural selection may average over all visual tasks to select diurnally, seasonally or ontogenetically. To survive in these variable the best set of visual pigments for that species. For example, honey light habitats, fish visual systems have evolved a suite of mechanisms bee vision is good for detecting most
    [Show full text]