DOCSLIB.ORG

Role, Importance and Vulnerability of Top Predators on the Great Barrier Reef – a Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Role, Importance and Vulnerability of Top Predators on the Great Barrier Reef – a Review RESEARCH PUBLICATION NO. 105 Role, importance and vulnerability of top predators on the Great Barrier Reef – A review Daniela Ceccarelli and Tony Ayling RESEARCH PUBLICATION NO. 105 Role, importance and vulnerability of top predators on the Great Barrier Reef – A review Daniela Ceccarelli and Tony Ayling C&R Consulting PO Box 1379 Townsville QLD 4810 Telephone: (07) 4750 0700 Fax: (07) 4772 6093 Email: [email protected] www.gbrmpa.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISBN 978 1 921682 26 1 (pdf) This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the prior written permission of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. The National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry : Ceccarelli, D. Role, importance and vulnerability of top predators on the Great Barrier Reef - a review [electronic resource] : final report / Daniela Ceccarelli and Tony Ayling. ISBN 978 1 921682 26 1 (pdf) Research publication (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority: Online) ; no. 105. Includes bibliographical references. Predatory animals--Queensland--Great Barrier Reef. Fisheries management--Queensland. Ayling, Tony, 1947- C&R Consulting. 591.53 DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government. While reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Director, Communication and Knowledge Management Group 2-68 Flinders Street PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810 Australia Phone: (07) 4750 0700 Fax: (07) 4772 6093 [email protected] Comments and inquiries on this document are welcome and should be addressed to: Chief Scientist, Director Science Coordination [email protected] www.gbrmpa.gov.au RESPONSE TO THE REPORT This report contributes to our knowledge and understanding of the role and importance of apex predators within the Great Barrier Reef Ecosystem. It reinforces that the role of predation in tropical marine ecosystems is complex and spread across a range of species and habitats that are connected in ways that are not well understood. It reinforces the need to verify the status of shark and other important predator populations within the Great Barrier Reef ecosystem. The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) has carefully considered the Report's recommendations and will factor them, as appropriate, into its strategic planning and the ongoing development of research and management priorities in the light of the direction provided by the Outlook Report. Recommendation GBRMPA Comment Improved integration is required between When deciding on whether to approve the fisheries and ecosystem management and Wildlife Trade Operation (WTO) for the better application of ecosystem-based ECIFF, the Minister set a number of fisheries management (Pikitch et al. 2004). conditions that were aimed at improving For instance, a panel charged with the ecosystem-based fisheries reviewing the proposed new management management of the ECIFF. Many of these arrangements for the ECIFF [East Coast conditions relate to improved protection for Inshore Finfish Fishery] considered that high level predators, including sharks. this fishery is operating within a MPA [marine protected area] in a World Heritage Area, and the arrangements to protect the sustainability of sharks were not sufficient. However, the new management arrangements included scope for a shark TAC [total allowable catch] of 600t, and for interactions with protected species (Gunn et al. 2008). It is recommended that the GBRMPA Other more extensive research has assess the viability of establishing a identified that regional variation in the greater number and area of Pink (no-go) apparent effectiveness of Marine Protected Zones on the GBR; recent work on a Areas is likely to reflect long-standing number of generalist top predators regional variations in the amount of fishing suggests a much better level of and its impacts outside closed areas, compliance in Pink Zones than Green (no- rather than wholesale subversion of zoning take) Zones. It is recommended that the strategies by high levels of poaching (see GBRMPA investigate the viability, cost and quote from Mapstone et al., below). Given logistics of enabling further legislative this, the GBRMPA considers that focussed protection of predators, prioritising species education and compliance programs, for consideration according to this review's combined with advances in surveillance risk assessment. technology, will provide a more cost- effective and appropriate solution than increasing the area of Pink (no-access) Zones. Improved education is required on the The GBRMP Act (1975) has been recently importance of green zone compliance. reviewed and a number of amendments Better enforcement and stricter penalties were made to increase penalties and for infringing on green zones; current strengthen the basis for enforcement. levels are not adequately deterring non- Research and monitoring, including counts i compliant fishers (Ayling & Choat 2008). of sharks and reef fishes, provides valuable intelligence of hot-spots of non- compliance. This information is being used to target surveillance and education efforts. The GBRMPA is also developing a communication strategy to better promote the overall effectiveness of marine park zoning; not just focussing on no-take zones. "Surveys of areas that had been open and closed to fishing for over a decade showed that the two main target species of the RLF, the common coral trout and the red throat emperor, were significantly more abundant, larger and older in areas zoned Marine National Park ‘B’ (and so closed to fishing) than in adjacent General Use areas that have always been open to fishing. The magnitude of these differences varied regionally, from near-zero around Lizard Island to several-fold for some population characteristics in the southern regions of the GBR. The pattern in apparent ‘effectiveness’ of past closures matched closely patterns in the amount of fishing effort and catch and underlying patterns in the abundances of several harvest and non-harvest species. We present circumstantial arguments that this regional variation in the apparent ‘effectiveness’ of Marine Protected Areas is likely to reflect long- standing regional variations in the amounts of fishing and its impacts outside closed areas, rather than wholesale subversion of zoning strategies by high levels of poaching. That is, the lack of contrast between open and closed areas in the Lizard Region probably arises because the open areas are lightly fished, whereas the strong contrasts in the other regions arises because of relatively heavy fishing in the open areas in those regions." Quote from Mapstone et al. (2004) The effects of line fishing on the Great Barrier Reef and evaluations of alternative potential management strategies. Technical Report No. 52, CRC Reef research Centre, Townsville. Research recommendation Proposed response (quoted verbatim) Effective censuses of the status and catch of The recommended research would those species prioritised through the risk potentially advance the knowledge assessment (especially those falling into the base pertaining to the conservation ‘extreme’ and ‘very high’ risk categories are an status of apex predators in the essential first step towards understanding the Marine Park. However, the need for current status of the most important predators on the research must be considered in the GBR. This would help to determine which the context of existing research species are undergoing the greatest decline, and priorities, which are outlined in the assist in further prioritising limited resources for document titled "Scientific more detailed biological and ecological studies. information needs for the management of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park 2009 – 2014". Distribution, abundance and life-history data is The recommended research would required for many of the predator species. Some potentially advance the knowledge of this research is underway for some species, base pertaining to the threats and but it needs to be completed for all exploited GBR risks to apex predators in the Marine sharks as a priority. It is suggested that research Park. However, the need for the on individual species be prioritised according to research must be considered in the this review’s importance index and / or risk context of existing research ii assessment. Research on individual species, priorities, which are outlined in the particularly sharks, should include: document titled "Scientific - Life history and habitat use information information needs for the for all species, especially those caught management of the Great Barrier by fisheries and prioritising the most ‘at Reef Marine Park 2009 – 2014". risk’; - Logbooks and observer programs that distinguish between species as much as possible. Better effort and catch data for all species across all fisheries, with better and more regular reporting mechanisms; - Records of how many sharks a year are taken as by-catch;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Book (PDF)
    e · ~ e t · aI ' A Field Guide to Grouper and Snapper Fishes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Family: SERRANIDAE, Subfamily: EPINEPHELINAE and Family: LUTJANIDAE) P. T. RAJAN Andaman & Nicobar Regional Station Zoological Survey of India Haddo, Port Blair - 744102 Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Rajan, P. T. 2001. Afield guide to Grouper and Snapper Fishes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. (Published - Director, Z.5.1.) Published : December, 2001 ISBN 81-85874-40-9 Front cover: Roving Coral Grouper (Plectropomus pessuliferus) Back cover : A School of Blue banded Snapper (Lutjanus lcasmira) © Government of India, 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher'S consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable. PRICE Indian Rs. 400.00 Foreign $ 25; £ 20 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, 234/4, AJe Bose Road, 2nd MSO Building, (13th Floor), Nizam Palace, Calcutta-700 020 after laser typesetting by Computech Graphics, Calcutta 700019 and printed at Power Printers, New Delhi - 110002.
    [Show full text]
  • Most Impaired" Coral Reef Areas in the State of Hawai'i
    Final Report: EPA Grant CD97918401-0 P. L. Jokiel, K S. Rodgers and Eric K. Brown Page 1 Assessment, Mapping and Monitoring of Selected "Most Impaired" Coral Reef Areas in the State of Hawai'i. Paul L. Jokiel Ku'ulei Rodgers and Eric K. Brown Hawaii Coral Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program (CRAMP) Hawai‘i Institute of Marine Biology P.O.Box 1346 Kāne'ohe, HI 96744 Phone: 808 236 7440 e-mail: [email protected] Final Report: EPA Grant CD97918401-0 April 1, 2004. Final Report: EPA Grant CD97918401-0 P. L. Jokiel, K S. Rodgers and Eric K. Brown Page 2 Table of Contents 0.0 Overview of project in relation to main Hawaiian Islands ................................................3 0.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................3 0.2 Overview of coral reefs – Main Hawaiian Islands........................................................4 1.0 Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay .................................................................................................................12 1.1 South Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay Segment ...................................................................................62 1.2 Central Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay Segment..................................................................................86 1.3 North Ka¯ne‘ohe Bay Segment ....................................................................................94 2.0 South Moloka‘i ................................................................................................................96 2.1 Kamalō
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment of Kahana Stream, Island of O'ahu
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Biological Assessment of Kahana Stream, Island of O‘ahu, Hawai‘i: An Application of PABITRA Survey Methods1 J. M. Fitzsimons,2 J. E. Parham,3 L. K. Benson,4 M. G. McRae,2 and R. T. Nishimoto5 Abstract: Aquatic biologists surveyed Kahana Stream on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, during December 2001 and January, March, and May 2002 to provide a background of information before restoring water diverted from the headwaters of the stream since the mid-1920s. Kahana Stream has all but one species of macrofauna com- mon in unaltered Hawaiian streams, but abundance and distribution of am- phidromous species differ conspicuously. A single specimen of ‘o‘opu ‘alamo‘o (Lentipes concolor) was found near the headwaters; until recently, this species was regarded as extinct on O‘ahu. Only two individuals of the freshwater limpet (hı¯hı¯wai, Neritina granosa) were found, and the brackish-water limpet (hapawai, Neritina vespertina) was not observed. Construction of the Waia¯hole Ditch Tun- nel about 80 yr ago reduced the amount of water entering Kahana headwaters, and unimpeded growth of hau (Hibiscus tiliaceus) from the shore into the stream has slowed water movement in the middle and lower sections of the stream and estuary. Reduced flow has resulted in an extension farther inland of certain es- tuarine and lower-reach species (the prawn Macrobrachium grandimanus and fishes Eleotris sandwicensis and Stenogobius hawaiiensis). Alien fishes and larger in- vertebrates occur throughout Kahana Stream.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • New Record of the Chinamanfish, Symphorus
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ICHTHYOLOGY, Vol. 27, No. 2, 149-152, June 2015 Received: April 17, 2015 ISSN: 1225-8598 (Print), 2288-3371 (Online) Revised: June 8, 2015 Accepted: June 24, 2015 New Record of the Chinamanfish,Symphorus nematophorus (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) from Korea By Maeng Jin Kim, Tae Seok Mun1, Jeong-Hoon Lee1, Young Min Choi and Choon Bok Song2,* West Sea Fisheries Research Institute, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), Incheon 400-420, Korea 1Southeast Sea Fisheries Research Institute, NFRDI, Tongyeong 690-943, Korea 2College of Ocean Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju City 690-756, Korea ABSTRACT A single specimen of Symphorus nematophorus (481.0 mm in SL), belonging to the family Lutjanidae, was firstly collected by a set net in the coastal waters of Geojae Island, located in south sea of Korea on August 1, 2014. This specimen was characterized by having the anterior dorsal soft rays produced into filaments, a pit between eye and nostril, no tooth on vomer, and nine longitudinal blue strips on both sides of the body. We propose a new Korean name, “Sil-tung-dom-sok” and “Sil-tung-dom” for the genus and species, respectively. Key words: Lutjanidae, Symphorus nematophorus, new record, Geojae Island, Korea INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS The snapper fish (family Lutjanidae), belonging to the The specimen was preserved in 10% formalin for a order Perciformes, comprises 185 species in 17 genera week and then transferred to 70% ethanol. Counts and worldwide (Nelson, 2006). Among them, 13 species in measurements are followed by the methods of Hubbs and five genera were known in Korea (Kim et al., 2005, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior of Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, in Relation to Trawl Modifications to Reduce Shrimp Trawler Bycatch
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1998 Behavior of Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, in Relation to Trawl Modifications to Reduce Shrimp Trawler Bycatch. Donna Reeve Rogers Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Rogers, Donna Reeve, "Behavior of Red Snapper, Lutjanus Campechanus, in Relation to Trawl Modifications to Reduce Shrimp Trawler Bycatch." (1998). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6757. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6757 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. U M I films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send U M I a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015
    Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 Patrícia Amorim | Fishery Analyst, Systems Division | [email protected] Megan Westmeyer | Fishery Analyst, Strategy Communications and Analyze Division | [email protected] CITATION Amorim, P. and M. Westmeyer. 2016. Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015. Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation. 18 pp. Available from www.fishsource.com. PHOTO CREDITS left: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) right: Image courtesy of Pedro Veiga (Pedro Veiga Photography) © Sustainable Fisheries Partnership February 2016 KEYWORDS Developing countries, FAO, fisheries, grouper, improvements, seafood sector, small-scale fisheries, snapper, sustainability www.sustainablefish.org i Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The goal of this report is to provide a brief overview of the current status and trends of the snapper and grouper seafood sector, as well as to identify the main gaps of knowledge and highlight areas where improvements are critical to ensure long-term sustainability. Snapper and grouper are important fishery resources with great commercial value for exporters to major international markets. The fisheries also support the livelihoods and food security of many local, small-scale fishing communities worldwide. It is therefore all the more critical that management of these fisheries improves, thus ensuring this important resource will remain available to provide both food and income. Landings of snapper and grouper have been steadily increasing: in the 1950s, total landings were about 50,000 tonnes, but they had grown to more than 612,000 tonnes by 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • American Samoa Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2017
    ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT: AMERICAN SAMOA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2017 Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 PHONE: (808) 522-8220 FAX: (808) 522-8226 www.wpcouncil.org The ANNUAL STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION REPORT for the AMERICAN SAMOA ARCHIPELAGO FISHERY ECOSYSTEM PLAN 2017 was drafted by the Fishery Ecosystem Plan Team. This is a collaborative effort primarily between the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, NMFS-Pacific Island Fisheries Science Center, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Division of Aquatic Resources (HI) Department of Marine and Wildlife Resources (AS), Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources (Guam), and Division of Fish and Wildlife (CNMI). This report attempts to summarize annual fishery performance looking at trends in catch, effort and catch rates as well as provide a source document describing various projects and activities being undertaken on a local and federal level. The report also describes several ecosystem considerations including fish biomass estimates, biological indicators, protected species, habitat, climate change, and human dimensions. Information like marine spatial planning and best scientific information available for each fishery are described. This report provides a summary of annual catches relative to the Annual Catch Limits established by the Council in collaboration with the local fishery management agencies. Edited By: Marlowe Sabater, Asuka Ishizaki, Thomas Remington, and Sylvia Spalding, WPRFMC. This document can be cited as follows: WPRFMC, 2018. Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the American Samoa Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 2017. Sabater, M., Ishizaki, A., Remington, T., Spalding, S. (Eds.) Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Appendices
    APPENDICES APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 – PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIC PAPERS Aidoo EN, Ute Mueller U, Hyndes GA, and Ryan Braccini M. 2015. Is a global quantitative KL. 2016. The effects of measurement uncertainty assessment of shark populations warranted? on spatial characterisation of recreational fishing Fisheries, 40: 492–501. catch rates. Fisheries Research 181: 1–13. Braccini M. 2016. Experts have different Andrews KR, Williams AJ, Fernandez-Silva I, perceptions of the management and conservation Newman SJ, Copus JM, Wakefield CB, Randall JE, status of sharks. Annals of Marine Biology and and Bowen BW. 2016. Phylogeny of deepwater Research 3: 1012. snappers (Genus Etelis) reveals a cryptic species pair in the Indo-Pacific and Pleistocene invasion of Braccini M, Aires-da-Silva A, and Taylor I. 2016. the Atlantic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Incorporating movement in the modelling of shark Evolution 100: 361-371. and ray population dynamics: approaches and management implications. Reviews in Fish Biology Bellchambers LM, Gaughan D, Wise B, Jackson G, and Fisheries 26: 13–24. and Fletcher WJ. 2016. Adopting Marine Stewardship Council certification of Western Caputi N, de Lestang S, Reid C, Hesp A, and How J. Australian fisheries at a jurisdictional level: the 2015. Maximum economic yield of the western benefits and challenges. Fisheries Research 183: rock lobster fishery of Western Australia after 609-616. moving from effort to quota control. Marine Policy, 51: 452-464. Bellchambers LM, Fisher EA, Harry AV, and Travaille KL. 2016. Identifying potential risks for Charles A, Westlund L, Bartley DM, Fletcher WJ, Marine Stewardship Council assessment and Garcia S, Govan H, and Sanders J.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Spermonde Archipelago, South Sulawesi
    Jurnal Iktiologi Indonesia, 10(1): 83-92, 2010 THE SNAPPER (LUTJANIDAE) OF SPERMONDE ARCHIPELAGO, SOUTH SULAWESI Andi Iqbal Burhanuddin1 and Yukio Iwatsuki2 1 Laboratory of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Hasanuddin University 2 Division of Fisheries Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Japan Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Hasanuddin University Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km 10 Makassar 90245 correspondence author e-mail: [email protected] Received: 12 Mei 2010, Accepted: 15 Juni 2010 ABSTRACT Fish diversity monitoring could be used as a basis for formulating management of the fisheries resources. This study was conducted to describe the snapper of the family Lutjanidae from the Spermonde Archipelago, South Sulawesi. Spe- cimens were collected in Rajawali and Paotere Fish Landing Port Makassar, South Sulawesi from November 2005 to August 2009. The result showed that there was 42 species representing eight genera of family Lutjanidae inhabiting the area were examined and identified: Aphareus furca, A. rutilans, Aprion virescens, Etelis carbunculus, E. radiosus, Lut- janus argentimaculatus, L. bengalensis, L. biguttatus, L. bohar, L. boutton, L. carponotatus, L. decussatus, L. fulvus, L. sebae, L. fulviflamma, L. fuscescens. L. johnii, L. kasmira, L. gibbus, L. lemniscatus, L. lunulatus, L. lutjanus, L. mala- baricus, L. monostigma, L. quinquelineatus, L. rivulatus, L. russelli, L. sebae, L. timorensis, L. vitta, Macolor macularis, M. niger, Paracaesio kusakarii, Pristipomoides argyrogrammicus, P. auricilla, P. filamentosus, P. flavipinnis, P. mul- tidens, P. typus, P. zonatus, Symphorichthys spilurus, S. nematophorus. The local name available of each species was given. Key words: Lutjanidae, Snapper, South Sulawesi, Spermonde. INTRODUCTION diversity monitoring and could hopefully be used Spermonde archipelago (Spermonde shelf) as a basic data for formulating management regu- located in the Southern Makassar Strait, south- lation of the fisheries resources for the Spermon- west coast of Sulawesi Island.
    [Show full text]