DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpretation of EU Law

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpretation of EU Law Interpretation of EU Law Interpretation of EU Law primary law, such as the creation of a common market. Considering the spirit and purpose of a Hannes Rösler 1. Subject and purpose provision as well as the comprehensive pro- gramme of the European Community can be Neither primary nor secondary EU law contains problematic when different purposes (eg free interpretation rules similar to those in Arts 7–9 market and protection interests) conflict. This CISG, Arts 5:101–5:107 PECL, Arts 4.1–4.8 applies to those directives that serve the overall UNIDROIT PICC and Arts 31–33 VCLT (→ inter- interest of achieving the internal market but also pretation of international uniform law). Instead, address issues such as employee or consumer the → European Court of Justice (ECJ) was protection. created as an independent and supranational On the whole, the judgments often reflect effet court with exclusive jurisdiction over the inter- utile. The practical effectiveness of EU law fre- pretation of European Community and Union quently seems to be the main objective of the law (Art 220 EC, now largely replaced by Art 19 court in its interpretation and development of TEU). This non-political body promotes unity, law (→ principle of effectiveness). This approach continuity and acceptance of EU law. The ECJ can be witnessed in the extending of employ- with its power to provide authoritative inter- ment protection to part-time workers by classi- pretation became a ‘motor of integration’ en- fying them as employees (ECJ Case 53/81 – Levin suring and extending the primacy of EU law. [1982] ECR 1035, para 15). The ECJ mainly uses the grammatical, sys- There is very little reference to → comparative tematic and purposive methods of interpretation. law in the ECJ’s judgments. References to the le- Von Savigny’s fourth method, the historical-po- gal systems of Member States can more often be litical approach, is rarely employed. The reasons found in the opinions of the Advocate General. for this are the often complex and incompletely The lack of references to comparative law in the published legislative history as well as the fact ECJ’s judgments may appear somewhat surpris- that European legislation often represents the ing given that directives are often based on com- result of compromises. However, the EU legisla- parative law. It also seems natural to assume that ture does list recitals which the ECJ employs in its a panel consisting of judges from different legal purpose-oriented interpretation. On the other systems would employ this tool. However, com- hand the ECJ refuses to consider the minutes of parative considerations are not explicitly incor- the Commission, the Council or Parliament that porated in the judgments to prevent the EU’s are not reflected in the legislation (ECJ Case C- autonomous legal texts from being undermined 404/06 – Quelle [2008] ECR I-2685, para 32). by references to particular legal systems. First and foremost, the ECJ uses the literal Nonetheless, comparative law has a role to method. In particular, it uses coordinate versions play in filling gaps and developing general prin- of texts in the different official languages. This ciples. For example, the ECJ explained state li- shows the influence of the French Conseil d’Etat ability with reference to general legal principles, which also explains the concise and deductive existing in international law and found in all the style of reasoning employed by the ECJ. This ap- Member States (ECJ Joined Cases C-46/93 and C- proach limits the Court’s ability to make a con- 48/93 – Brasserie du pêcheur [1996] ECR I-1029, tribution to legal theory and to the systematic paras 29 ff). Furthermore, Art 11(3) TEU/6(2) EU development of European private law. The apo- invites comparative references in providing that dictic and self-referential nature of the judg- the common constitutional traditions of the ments to some extent follows from the nature of Member States are a source of fundamental the Court as an international panel of judges that rights (see also Art 340(2) TFEU). has to reconcile different legal cultures and lan- A distinctive feature of EU law is the fact that it guages. It follows from this that an approach fo- is perceived of as an autonomous body of law. cused on the interpretation of the grammatical This is similar to the other Conventions over context and the analysis of common parlance which the ECJ also has jurisdiction. In order for within (autonomous) EU law must necessarily be the rules and concepts of European law to be im- limited. plemented consistently, their application has to This is why, crucially, the ECJ often employs be independent of national preconceptions. The purposive considerations, an approach not only Member States also have an obligation to uphold used for resolving disputes caused by diverging the autonomy of EU law. However, in the main it versions of texts. This method is also suggested is the ECJ that creates interpretational guidelines by the functional perspective chosen by the EU, having legally binding force (→ precedent, rule trying to achieve the goals determined in the of). For this the ECJ depends on the willingness Hannes Rösler 979 Interpretation of EU Law and case-based obligation on Member State can have a ‘vertical’ direct effect for the state. courts to refer cases according to Art 267 TFEU/ However, a direct ‘horizontal’ effect, ie between 234 EC. private parties, does not exist (ECJ Joined Cases C-397/01 to C-403/01 – Pfeiffer [2004] ECR 2. Interpretation of primary law I-8835, para 108). This rule is based on the sys- Regarding law with constitutional status, the ECJ tematic reasoning that a horizontal effect of di- is willing to practice judicial activism. Judges are rectives would override the distinction between no longer la bouche de la loi as demanded by directives and regulations set out in the EC Montesquieu, but exceed the possible literal Treaty and now in the TFEU (ECJ Case C-91/92 – meaning and thus cross the line to the further Faccini Dori [1994] ECR I-3325, para 24). development of law (→ judge-made law). No- where—not in the interpretation of EU law nor in 3. Rules of interpretation for national courts other legal systems—is this line drawn clearly. These legal developments on the constitutional However, a distinction should be drawn between level affect European private law. Besides the interpretation and innovation since the judicial relevance of the state liability doctrine for the law development of law demands an unintended of torts, this is also true for the obligation of na- regulatory gap and thus a higher effort of rea- tional courts to interpret national law in accor- soning. According to Art 220(1) EC, which is now dance with European law. Acting as a kind of mainly replaced by Art 19(1)(I) TEU, the role of meta-rule, this influences and controls the four the judges of the ECJ is to develop EU law. This is above-mentioned methods of interpretation and justified on the basis that the Court has to ‘en- does so in a way that is similar to the interpreta- sure that in interpretation and application of this tion in conformity with the constitution (verfas- Treaty the law is observed’ and the fact that the sungskonforme Auslegung) known to German ‘law’ transcends the rules expressly stipulated in law. Furthermore, the obligation of the Member the treaties. States to interpret law in accordance with Euro- The most important legal principles devel- pean law includes the compatibility with primary oped through this process by the ECJ to comple- law and the conformity with secondary law. In ment the written primary law are the primacy particular, the Member States’ courts are obliged (ECJ Case 26/62 – Van Gend & Loos [1963] ECR 3) to interpret their laws in a way that conforms to and the direct effect of EU law (ECJ Case 6/64 – the directives. This has to be done by applying Costa/E.N.E.L. [1964] ECR 1141). Also significant their own national methods of interpretation are the application of fundamental rights in the (ECJ Joined Cases C-397/01 to C-403/01 – Pfeiffer EU (ECJ Case 29/69 – Stauder/Stadt Ulm [1969] [2004] ECR I-8835, para 116). ECR 419), the specification of fundamental free- Accordingly, the national law has to be inter- doms (ECJ Case 120/78 – Cassis de Dijon [1979] preted on the basis of the wording and the pur- ECR 649), state liability (ECJ Joined Cases C-6/90 pose of the directive in question as far as feasible and C-9/90 – Francovich [1991] ECR I-5357) and under national rules (ECJ Case C-106/89 – Mar- the extent of EU citizenship (ECJ Case C-184/99 – leasing [1990] ECR I-4135, para 8; also ECJ Grzelczyk [2001] ECR I-6193). Case 14/83 – von Colson and Kamann [1984] By developing these principles the Court is ECR 1891, para 28). Such interpretation in accor- creating and specifying those elements of the dance with a directive can directly affect and, rule of law required by a fully-fledged legal sys- therefore, disadvantage private individuals. This tem. Ultimately, according to the conception of leads, in effect, to a horizontal effect which is the ECJ, European law is not part of international otherwise excluded. The more generously this law, which is characterized by a strong consid- way of interpretation is permitted, the more the eration of national sovereignty. Although con- actual scope of state liability for legislative injus- cluded by way of an international agreement, the tice is minimized (cf, however, for a mistake by E(E)C Treaty is—in contrast to more common the judiciary ECJ Case C-224/01 – Köbler [2003] international treaties—the constitutional charter ECR I-10239; ECJ Case C-173/03 – Traghetti del of an autonomous community based on the rule Mediterraneo [2006] ECR I-5177).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Criminal Law of Afghanistan
    2ND EDITION AN INTRODUCTION TO THE C RIMINAL LAW OF AFGHANISTAN An Introduction to the Criminal Law of Afghanistan Second Edition Afghanistan Legal Education Project (ALEP) Stanford Law School http://alep.stanford.edu [email protected] Stanford Law School Crown Quadrangle 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305-8610 www.law.stanford.edu ALEP – STANFORD LAW SCHOOL Authors Eli Sugarman (Co-Founder, Student Co-Director, 2008-09) Anne Stephens Lloyd (Student Co-Director, 2008-09) Raaj Narayan (Student Co-Director, 2009-10) Max Rettig (Student Co-Director, 2009-10) Una Au Scott Schaeffer Editors Stephanie Ahmad (Rule of Law Fellow, 2011-12) Rose Leda Ehler (Student Co-Director, 2011-12) Daniel Lewis (Student Co-Director, 2011-12) Elizabeth Espinosa Jane Farrington Gabriel Ledeen Nicholas Reed Faculty Director Erik Jensen Rule of Law Program Executive Director Megan Karsh Program Advisor Rolando Garcia Miron AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF AFGHANISTAN Contributing Faculty Editors Nafay Choudhury Rohullah Azizi Naqib Ahmad Khpulwak Hamid Khan Chair of the Department of Law Taylor Strickling, 2012-13 Hadley Rose, 2013-14 Mehdi Hakimi, 2014- Translation Assistance Elite Legal Services, Ltd. Table of Contents PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1: AN INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Interpretation As Practical Reasoning
    Statutory Interpretation as Practical Reasoning William N. Eskridge, Jr.* Philip P. Frickey** In the last decade, statutory interpretation has reemerged as an im- portant topic of academic theory and discussion.' This development is welcome, since few topics are more relevant to legal craft and educa- tion than the interpretation of statutes, now our primary source of law. The recent theoretical views, however, contrast with practicing lawyers' strategies of statutory interpretation. When practitioners give advice to clients about what a statute means, their approach is usually eclectic: They look at the text of the relevant statutory provisions, any legislative history that is available, the context in which the legislation was en- acted, the overall legal landscape, and the lessons of common sense and good policy. But when law professors talk about statutory interpre- tation, they tend to posit a more abstract, "grand" theory that privi- leges one or another of these approaches as "foundational."' 2 The commentators' grand theories contrast with the more ad hoc, fact- based reasoning of the practicing lawyer. How do judges interpret statutes? How should they? Many com- mentators argue that judicial interpretation is, or at least ought to be, inspired by grand theory. We think these commentators are wrong, both descriptively and normatively: Judges' approaches to statutory in- terpretation are generally eclectic, not inspired by any grand theory, * Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. ** Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School. We thank Daniel Farber, Dennis Patterson, Richard Posner, Suzanna Sherry, and Peter Strauss for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
    LESSON ONE “United States Code of Law – Title 18, Chapter 13 Section 241 & 242” Need: All across the Corporate State of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and its many subordinate ENCLAVES (CORPORATE STATE OF MISSOURI, CITY OF FERGUSON, ETC.) there has been an increasing amount of “Deprivation of Human, International and Indigenous Rights” committed by “alleged” Public Officials/Officers who are operating under “COLOR OF LAW”. Through Our analysis of the Michael “Mike Mike” Brown Jr. Case/Situation and through Our study and application of the Supreme Law of the Land (U.S.C., Constitutional, and International) we will be able to over stand the lawful status and predicament of the so-called Black, Colored, Negro, and African- American communities and what must be done to Lawfully to correct the “Problem” of Our People. End Goal: To inform Natural Persons and Citizens, alike, of their Constitutional, Universal Human, and Indigenous Rights so that they may confidently Exercise and if needed Defend their Unalienable Rights with impunity. United States Code of Law – (U.S.C.) - The Code of Laws of the United States of America[1] (variously abbreviated to Code of Laws of the United States, United States Code, U.S. Code, or U.S.C.) is the official compilation and codification of the general and permanent federal laws of the United States. It contains 51 titles,[2] along with a further four proposed titles.[3] The main edition is published every six years by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives, and cumulative supplements are published annually.[4][5] The official version of those laws not codified in the United States Code can be found in United States Statutes at Large.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Rule of Law
    History of the Rule of Law 1 CONTEMPORARY FINE ART COLLECTION Since it opened in 1933, the Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center has been home to numerous soaring and spectacular murals, and neoclassical, awe-inspiring architecture. Today, a new generation of art is also on display throughout the building. The Supreme Court of Ohio contemporary fine art collection is a unique display of pieces from renowned Ohio artists, portraying themes exploring the beauty of the law, the diversity of our land and the nobility of Ohio’s most precious resource: its people. HISTORY OF THE RULE OF LAW SERIES The Supreme Court of Ohio Rule of Law Gallery is home to the History of the Rule of Law, a series of six, 4x6’ oil paintings created by artist Ron Anderson that depict the evolution of law in Western civilization. The paintings, located on the 11th Floor of the Moyer Judicial Center, are on permanent loan from the Ohio State Bar Association. THE CODE OF HAMMURABI AND THE RULE OF RAMSES THE GREAT TheTh Code C d of f Hammurabi H bi and d the h Rule R l of f Ramses R the h Great G , 2005,2005 oil il on canvas. The first panel presents Hammurabi (1795-1750 B.C.), the Babylonian king to whom the first written Code of Law is attributed. He appears to be in the process of passing judgment on a situation before him, while a scribe records the proceedings in cuneiform. To the right of the Egyptian column in the center of the panel is a study of the “Land of Khem,” or Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Interpretation of Statutes April 2020
    Judicial Interpretation of Statutes April 2020 Executive Summary Courts in the United States serve several functions. They oversee civil and criminal trials, issue orders requiring or prohibiting certain actions, decide whether a particular law violates the constitution, and determine the meaning of language in a contract or law. This publication discusses the role the courts play in interpreting statutes. The primary focus of statutory interpretation is the language of a statute. Courts only move beyond that language when there is ambiguity. This publication discusses the tests and tools the court uses to resolve ambiguity and includes questions for legislators to consider when crafting legislation. Authority to Interpret Statutes The judicial system in the United States adopted the common law system from England.1 Under that system there were few statutes. Courts developed the law by relying on general principles, following decisions of prior courts, and applying that guidance to the specific facts of a case. The common law tradition gave courts great power to say what the law was, and there was an understanding that courts in the United States retained that power. In one of the most famous decisions by the United States Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison, the court said: “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule.”2 Every court has the authority to interpret statutes. Minnesota has three levels of courts— district courts, the court of appeals, and the supreme court.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Interpretation--In the Classroom and in the Courtroom
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1983 Statutory Interpretation--in the Classroom and in the Courtroom Richard A. Posner Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard A. Posner, "Statutory Interpretation--in the Classroom and in the Courtroom," 50 University of Chicago Law Review 800 (1983). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Statutory Interpretation-in the Classroom and in the Courtroom Richard A. Posnerf This paper continues a discussion begun in an earlier paper in this journal.1 That paper dealt primarily with the implications for statutory interpretation of the interest-group theory of legislation, recently revivified by economists; it also dealt with constitutional interpretation. This paper focuses on two topics omitted in the earlier one: the need for better instruction in legislation in the law schools and the vacuity of the standard guideposts to reading stat- utes-the "canons of construction." The topics turn out to be re- lated. The last part of the paper contains a positive proposal on how to interpret statutes. I. THE ACADEMIC STUDY OF LEGISLATION It has been almost fifty years since James Landis complained that academic lawyers did not study legislation in a scientific (i.e., rigorous, systematic) spirit,' and the situation is unchanged. There are countless studies, many of high distinction, of particular stat- utes, but they are not guided by any overall theory of legislation, and most academic lawyers, like most judges and practicing law- yers, would consider it otiose, impractical, and pretentious to try to develop one.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Law Worldwide: Учеб
    ИИ..НН.. ААййннууттддиинноовваа DDIISSCCOOVVEERR LLAAWW WWOORRLLDDWWIIDDEE часть I И.Н. Айнутдинова DDIISSCCOOVVEERR LLAAWW WWOORRLLDDWWIIDDEE Под общей редакцией доктора филологических наук, профессора Г.А. Багаутдиновой Учебное пособие по английскому языку для студентов юридических факультетов вузов Часть I 1 Печатается по рекомендации Учебно-методической комиссии и Учёного совета Института языка КГУ Научный консультант: академик РАО, доктор педагогических наук, профессор Г.В. Мухаметзянова Рецензенты: доктор педагогических наук, профессор Т.М.Трегубова; доктор филологических наук, профессор А.Г.Садыкова Айнутдинова И.Н. DISCOVER LAW WORLDWIDE: учеб. пособие по английскому языку для студентов юридических факультетов вузов: в 5 ч. / И. Н. Айнутдинова; под общ. ред. Г. А. Багаутдиновой. - Казань, Издательство Казанского университета, 2010. – 210 с. ISBN 978-5-98180-770-1 Учебное пособие «DISCOVER LAW WORLDWIDE» (часть I) начинает серию учебных книг по практическому изучению английского языка для студентов юридических факультетов высшей профессиональной школы, состоящей из 5 частей. Пособие состоит из 7-ми законченных модулей (блоков), снабжено дополнительным учебным материалом в виде шаблонов таблиц для заполнения с целью структурирования, систематизации и закрепления знаний по теме изучения; тем и заданий для самостоятельного и группового творчества; глоссария, содержащего наиболее значимую лексику по темам изучения; блока по дополнительному самостоятельному чтению текстов и отдельных тематически значимых правовых актов. Пособие отражает
    [Show full text]
  • SCCCMA Law Enforcement Liability
    Law Enforcement Liability South Carolina City and County Management Association Todd Williams Law Enforcement Stakeholders Meeting • Increase law enforcement training • Support reliable funding for the Criminal Justice Academy to allow for more training opportunities for law enforcement officers. • Increase funding for body worn cameras 1 Civil Actions • Intentional Torts: An intentional tort would occur when an officer, without justification, intentionally commits an act which is recognized by the law as a tort. • For example, if an officer were to use his baton to intentionally strike someone who had done nothing wrong. In the law of torts this would be recognized as a battery. In order to prove a battery; the plaintiff must prove that the officer intentionally caused a harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s body. Civil Actions • Negligence Actions: Another type of tort for which an officer may be sued is the tort of negligence. There are four basic elements of a negligence action. – A duty owed- All persons generally have a duty to act with reasonable care toward those they come into contact with. – A breach of the duty-A person breaches their duty when they fail to exercise reasonable care. – Causation- The breach of duty must be the cause in-fact and the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. – Damages-The plaintiff must suffer some damages as a result of the breach of duty. 2 Violation of Civil Rights- 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983. – Provides citizens with a remedy for redressing violations of civil rights. – Mechanism for enforcing rights that are granted by the United States Constitution or by a federal statue.
    [Show full text]
  • Textualism, Contract Theory, and the Interpretation of Treaties
    CURTIS J. MAHONEY Treaties as Contracts: Textualism, Contract Theory, and the Interpretation of Treaties ABSTRACT. With the nation's treaty obligations proliferating and foreign affairs cases taking up a growing share of the Supreme Court's docket, it is surprising how undertheorized the field of treaty interpretation remains. To fill this void, some have suggested that textualism, which has had a major impact on statutory interpretation over the past two decades, should be applied to treaty interpretation. This Note rebuts that notion and suggests instead that courts draw from modern contract theory in developing canons of treaty interpretation. AUTHOR. Yale Law School, J.D. zoo6; Harvard College, A.B. 20oo. The author wishes to thank Professor William N. Eskridge, Jr., for introducing him to the field of statutory interpretation and for advising the research project that led to this Note. He also wishes to thank Professor Akhil Amar, Aaron Crowell, Justin Florence, Kate Wiltenburg Todrys, and Kimberly Gahan for their comments on earlier drafts. Finally, he wishes to thank Rebecca Iverson Mahoney for all of her love and support. 824 Imaged with the Permission of Yale Law Journal NOTE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 826 I. STATE OF THE DOCTRINE 827 A. Treaty Interpretation in the Supreme Court 829 B. The Theoretical Problem 833 II. THE CASE FOR TEXTUALISM APPLIED TO TREATIES 834 A. Originalism and Treaty Interpretation 834 B. Public Choice Theory and the Structural Case for Textualism in Statutory Interpretation 838 C. The Structural Argument Applied to Treaty Interpretation 841 D. The Practical Application of Textualism to Treaty Interpretation 844 III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications 2001 The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance Wayne A. Logan Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Wayne A. Logan, The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance, 62 OHIO ST. L.J. 1409 (2001), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/196 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 62 Ohio St. L.J. 1409 2001 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Apr 29 13:00:47 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0048-1572 The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance WAYNE A. LOGAN* Although it often escapes attention, municipal governments possess significant authority to enact criminal laws consistent with their expansive home rule and police powers. In this article, Professor Logan explores the numerous ways in which this authority manifests, and reflects upon, several of the main concerns presented by the "shadow criminal law" thereby created.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cultures of Punishment
    Stanford Law Review Volume 68 May 2016 ARTICLE Two Cultures of Punishment Joshua Kleinfeld* Abstract. As American criminal punishment has become more severe and European more mild, the two systems of punishment have come to represent different cultural possibilities for the modern West. Implicit in American and European punishment are two visions of wrongdoing and wrongdoers, of the terms of the social contract, and of the foundations of rights. American punishment pictures serious offenders as morally deformed people rather than ordinary people who have committed crimes. Their criminality is thus both immutable and devaluing, a feature of the actor rather than merely the act. The forms of punishment deployed in response do not just exact retribution or exert social control, they expressively deny offenders’ claims to membership in the community and to the moral humanity in virtue of which a human being is rights bearing. European criminal punishment expressively denies that any offense marks the offender as a morally deformed person. Criminality is always mutable and never devaluing, actors are kept at a distance from their acts, and the forms of punishment affirm even the worst offenders’ claims to social membership and rights. These conflicting moral visions are not only implicit or immanent in European and American punishment but likely played a role—albeit not an exclusive role—in causing European and American punishment to diverge. After an enormous mid-century crime wave, two very different groups took hold of America’s politics of crime: moralists who viewed criminals as evil and instrumentalists who viewed criminals as dangerous beings. Different as the two groups were, they agreed on policy: for both, the crime problem was a criminals problem, and the solution was to get rid of criminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureaucracy and Law a Study of Chinese Criminal Courts and Social Media
    BUREAUCRACY AND LAW A STUDY OF CHINESE CRIMINAL COURTS AND SOCIAL MEDIA A dissertation presented by Yu Zhang to The School of Criminology and Criminal Justice In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Criminology and Criminal Justice Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts August, 2014 1 BUREAUCRACY AND LAW A STUDY OF CHINESE CRIMINAL COURTS AND SOCIAL MEDIA by Yu Zhang ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology and Justice Policy in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University August, 2014 2 Abstract Born in a firmly-rooted bureaucratic society, Chinese judiciary has never gained the opportunity to build its own identity. Concurrently, Chinese people, immersed in a bureaucratic culture, always pin their dream of justice on a powerful bureaucracy rather on a weak judiciary. The current study discusses the thousands years of Chinese history and the significant impact of bureaucracy on Chinese society and courts, and then look into the potential change in a global era revolutionized with technology and internet. A story-telling mode is used to analyze eleven important criminal cases to disclose the operations of criminal courts in China. Large amount of social media data are presented to showcase the dynamic legal community and online activism. We do not know exactly the impact of government monitoring of the social media and it is an open question. Chinese online legal activism derives its methods and vitality from multiple and intersecting forces, including the particular internet transmitting formats, actual contemporary protest forms, incipient public space promotion.
    [Show full text]