DOCSLIB.ORG

Botanist Corvallis, Oregon Funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Botanist Corvallis, Oregon Funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service T H R E A T E N E D A N D E N D A N G E R E D V A S C U L A R P L A N T S 0 F 0 R E G 0 N: A N I L L U S T R A T E D G U I D E By Robert J. Meinke, Botanist Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon EAigmon delicate Cronquist Funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Endangered Species Region I Portland, Oregon With assistance from U.S. Forest Service Bonneville Power Administration Bureau of Land Management Region 6 Portland Oregon State Office Portland Portland Corps of Engineers Walla Walla, Washington Cover: Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens L L L 6t C . 6 U L'4 S L I xipuaddV JO @N@6LL@UI POULWaa4Ra PUP PaMaLAa@ S@LoadS li Ltc ................... p@4PAjsnLjj JOU'MaLA@d @Aapun SDLDadS 'I XLpuaddV Lee .................................................... pace @,04P.A@-4@j 6 ..................................................... PaAa5uPPU3 JO PaU@4Paaqj SP 6ULISLI @Wj MDLAa@ japun SluPLd APLnosPA uO6@JO T -S4LIPLd APLnOsPA paja6uppu3 pup paua,4pajqi pasodOJd .10 P@;SLI UO6@-AO LLAY .................................... SUOL4e.A;snLLI Pup 4xal JO ;PwJ0A L LX . M@LA@d Aapun Pup LlO6@,AO ';SL. :s4uQld JO .1 LPOLzaqpqdLV 'T @Lqei LX . SUOL4PAaptsuoo Emnjn4 * ....................................... papnLoul expi lo kjL)wwnS * ........................ UOL4tULjap P :[email protected]@buPPu3 PUP P@u@4eaAql XL ........................................................ UOL;onpoA4uI L LA . S;UaWBPGLMOUJOV A ............................................................. @3PJ9,Ad 39Vd SIN31NOO JO llgVi PREFACE The following document presents a series of one-page descriptions of those vascular plants in Oregon currently being reviewed by the U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service for possible protection under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, T+ nn +ha ecologys and -^-A-A. @ ' ' @ k@,4, i,Fo,M.i-4nn@ identifirn+inn. ' -@ffp,Z' @'@ " ." - -1- .. geo graphic distribution of each taxon. Its purposes are to summarize current knowledge of each of these species and to stimulate further research on them. It is anticipated that this guide will be useful to both the professional and the concerned layperson. It should be of interest to anyone working with the rare plants found in Oregon. However, it has been designed primarily for those government land managers and field personnel who are responsible for determining and implementing public land policy affecting the majority of candidate species within the state. It is not a substitute for technical floristic works or detailed local reports, but provides the degree of famil- iarization necessary for land managers who wish to recognize the potentially threatened or endangered plants which occur in their areas. What is presented here is an initial effort and should not be interpreted as a definitive statement on the status of the plants described. Comprehensive information is not available on all the species, particularly those found east of the Cascades where field work has not been as extensive as in western Oregon. Species thought to be endangered or possibly exinct one year have been discovered to be plentiful the next, while those believed "secure" have been suddenly faced with extirpation. The list must change as necessary to reflect new information, but this dynamic quality should not be taken as an indication of lessened importance. Comments concerning the content of this manual are welcome and should be addressed to the author or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Office of Endangered Species in Portland. Correspondence is especially solicited from readers with new or overlooked data which may have a bearing on the status of any of the plants discussed in the following pages. Robert J. Meinke Post Office Box 1825 Corvallis, Oregon 97339 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals and several Federal agencies have made contributions essential to the completion of this manual. Research space and access to specimens was made available by the Oregon State University Herbarium in Corvallis. Work space was also donated by the Nature Conservancy in Portland. Financial support was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the AAM 4 Bonneville Power nu inI 1 scratch6 6 V... A number of outstanding botanical illustrators lent their talents to the project. Artists who prepared illustrations specifically for the manual are: Bobbi Angell (New York Botanical Garden), Kim Brandon (Humboldt State University), Natalie Geiger (Southern Oregon State College), Kate vanGelder (Portland State University), Bonnie Heidel (Fish and Wildlife Service), Frank Lang (Southern Oregon State College), Chuck Meinke (Oregon State University), and Linda Vorobik (University of Oregon). The University of Washington Press gave permission for the use of certain illustrations by Jeanne Janish from the first four volumes of Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest by C.L. Hitchcock et al. (1959-1969), as well as a few drawings of mem6-e-rs---of--Te family Compositae (Asteraceae) by John Rumley from volume 5 of the same work. Drs. Peter Hoch and Peter Raven (Missouri Botanical Garden) graciously provided illustrations of OenotheAa wof6ii by Wanling Peng, and Ep,@tobiuyn zisk@youen6e by Keith West, both of which will be used in forthcoming publications. Finally, Dr. James Reveal (University of Maryland) permitted use of Jeanne Janish's recent drawing of Etuiogonum c@Lozbyae (Brittonia 33:443. 1981), a welcome last minute addition. Individuals who have contributed unselfishly of their time and expertise with regard to preparation of the text include: Dr. Kenton Chambers (Oregon State University), who offered critical advice and the use of personal plant species files; Mary Sue Henifin (New York Botanical Garden), for preliminary data compilation; Dr. Janet Hohn (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) for logistic support and invaluable assistance throughout the manual preparation; and Jean Siddall, for sharing information on a number of taxa. Others who provided valuable assistance were Dr. Douglass Henderson (University of Idaho), Dr. Fred Johnson (University of Idaho), Dr. Pat Packard (College of Idaho), Dr. James Smith (Humboldt State University), Dr. Robert Steele (U.S. Forest Service), Karl Urban (Blue Mountain Community College), Dr. David Wagner (University of Oregon), and Margaret Williams (Northern Nevada Native Plant Society). Special thanks are extended to Jacque Greenleaf and Jack Kennison, compatriots in the basement of The Nature Conservancy in Portland and exceptional morale boosters during the early stages of the work. Appreciation also to Sadie Airth and Jane Tuor, typists. Undoubtedly the greatest share of credit due, however, goes to the many field botanists in Oregon, amateur and professional alike. These are the individuals who, often with little or no remuneration, have fanned out across the state in the last few years in search of rare plants, diligently compiling an excellent and impressive record of our threatened and endangered flora. It is largely their efforts which are reflected in this guide and their efforts which will be so vital to future revisions. To all these and to those who follow, the author extends his sincerest thanks and best wishes. vii Union Clackamas Wage on a a el-son Linn Grant Too a Desch es Harney Malheur u as Lake Klamath OREGON 96981 SQUARE MILES 251180 SQUARE KILOMETERS INTRODUCTION With the passage of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973, the plight of thousands of plants and animals facing extinction in the United States and elsewhere, was impressed upon the national consciousness. Threatened and Endangered plants, in particular, long overshadowed by more conspicuous creatures, began to gain a measure of recognition. Plants like the Furbish lnllcakan@t klirniniA rmindleaf birrh anrl Furpka Vallev duneareass could now share the spotlight with such notables as the whooping crane and gray wolf. Since its inception, the Endangered Species Act has provoked contrasting reactions. Some see its potential to interfere with economic development; others its ability to contribute to broad goals of environmental conservation. In practice, the potential for irresolvable conflict has rarely been realized. The more usual effect of considering endangered species in land use planning has been to lessen undesirable environmental effects while allowing planned projects to go forward. In 1973, the Smithsonian Insititution was directed by Congress to prepare an initial list (House Document Number 94-51) indicating plant taxa suspected at that time of being extinct, or in danger of extinction. Over 3,000 plants were included. This list was subsequently published in the Federal Register as a Notice of Review. A year later (June 16, 1976), the Fish and Wildlife Service published a proposal to list nearly 1700 species of plants. This proposal was withdrawn in October 1978. Of the numer ous plants which have been reviewed for listing, 63 are at this time officially' listed as Threatened or Endangered. Approximately 170 native plants of Oregon are under review for listing as Endangered or Threatened, and one has been proposed for inclusion on the Federal List of Threatened or Endangered Species (listing under Federal law is a regulatory process and requires publication of a proposed rule and provision of an opportunity for public comment before becoming final). Nearly a hundred Oregon plants have been reviewed and subsequently deleted after it was determined that they did not fit the definition of Threatened or Endangered under the Act; many of these were officially deleted in the most recent Federal Regisler Notice of Review published by the Fish and Wildlife Service7 on December 5, 1930. This illustrated guide is limited to Oregon plants that appear in the last Federal Register Notice of Review (December 15, 1980) entitled, "Endangered Yn-dThreatened Wildlife and Plants: Review of Plant Taxa for Listed as Threatened or Endangered Species (45:82480-82569)". Only vascular plants are considered and only those with the taxonomic rank of species, subspecies, or variety.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • 39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985
    39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Rules and Regulations reaction irreversibility or by formation polarography or square-wave (3) Irving, H., “The Stability of Metal of two or more complex species in polarography). Complexes and Their Measurement equilibrium with each other. In this last (3) Interpretation and evaluation of Polarographically," Advances ih case it is necessary to apply the method resu lts, (i) Stability constants Polarography Proceedings of the 2nd by De Ford and Hume paragraph (d) (8) determined for a new substance can be International Congress, Ed. I.S. of this section to calculate stepwise compared with literature values for Langmuir (Pergamon Press, 1960). formation constants. standard substances (see Reference (4) Perrin, D.D., Dempsey, B., B u ffe r (2) Test report, (i) The test report substances, above) and used therefore for pH and Metal Ion Controls. should list for each metal ion to evaluate the strength of its (Chapman and Hall: London, 1974). investigated the half-wave potential complexing ability. (5) “Stability Constants of Metal-ion Complexes,” Part B, Organic Ligands, Ei /2 , co-ordination number and overall (ii) The system is physically stability constant. Compiled by D.D. Perrin, IUPAC meaningful if (A) the value of the Publication on Chemical Data Series, stability constant is positive and (B) the (ii) In addition, the following should No. 22 (Pergamon Press, 1979) also be reported: standard error is less than the constant (6) Grabaric, B., Tkalcec, M., Piljac, L, (A) Type of polarisable micro­ (the t-test should be used as a criterion).
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland
    NATIONAL SYSTEM OF PUBLIC LANDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. Department of the Interior March 2020 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Draft Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland Restoration in the Great Basin Volume 3: Appendices B through N Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EIS $2,000,000 The Bureau of Land Management’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by conserving natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. Appendix B. Acronyms, Literature Cited, Glossary B.1 ACRONYMS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Full Phrase ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AML appropriate management level ARMPA Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment BCR bird conservation region BLM Bureau of Land Management BSU biologically significant unit CEQ Council on Environmental Quality EIS environmental impact statement EPA US Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ESR emergency stabilization and rehabilitation FIAT Fire and Invasives Assessment Tool FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act FY fiscal year GHMA general habitat management area HMA herd management area IBA important bird area IHMA important habitat management area MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MOU memorandum of understanding MtCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NIFC National Interagency Fire Center NRCS National Resources Conservation Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places NWCG National Wildfire Coordination Group OHMA other habitat management area OHV off-highway vehicle Programmatic EIS for Fuels Reduction and Rangeland Restoration in the Great Basin B-1 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems of Southwest Idaho - a Preliminary Conservation Strategy
    Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystems of Southwest Idaho - A Preliminary Conservation Strategy Steven K. Rust March 2002 Idaho Conservation Data Center Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Steven M. Huffaker, Director Prepared for: Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation through Section 6 funding from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 ii Table of Contents Introduction ............................................... 1 Methods ................................................. 1 Results and Discussion ..................................... 2 Literature Cited............................................ 3 Figures.................................................. 4 Tables................................................... 6 Appendix A .............................................. 17 Appendix B .............................................. 18 iii iv Introduction Decline in sagebrush-steppe habitats in the Northwest has been documented and described by a number of authors (Pellant 1990; Whisennant 1990; and others). Loss and fragmentation of sagebrush-steppe habitats has contributed to the decline of species that require these habitats for all or portions of their life cycle (e.g., sage grouse, Lepidium papilliferum, and others) (Connelly et al. 2000; Mancuso 2001; Moseley 1994; Paige and Ritter 1999; Sather-Blair et al. 2000). Relatively few large, high quality, expansive stands of sagebrush-steppe remain in southwestern Idaho. High quality stands in the region are threatened by the ecological stresses and
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 8-2016 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon James S. Kagan Portland State University Sue Vrilakas Portland State University, [email protected] John A. Christy Portland State University Eleanor P. Gaines Portland State University Lindsey Wise Portland State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 130 pp. This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors James S. Kagan, Sue Vrilakas, John A. Christy, Eleanor P. Gaines, Lindsey Wise, Cameron Pahl, and Kathy Howell This book is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub/25 RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER August 2016 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751,
    [Show full text]
  • Buzz-Pollinated Dodecatheon Originated from Within The
    American Journal of Botany 91(6): 926±942. 2004. BUZZ-POLLINATED DODECATHEON ORIGINATED FROM WITHIN THE HETEROSTYLOUS PRIMULA SUBGENUS AURICULASTRUM (PRIMULACEAE): ASEVEN-REGION CPDNA PHYLOGENY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR FLORAL EVOLUTION1 AUSTIN R. MAST,2,4 DANIELLE M. S. FELLER,2,5 SYLVIA KELSO,3 AND ELENA CONTI2 2Institute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland; and 3Department of Biology, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903 USA We sequenced seven cpDNA regions from 70 spp. in Dodecatheon, Primula subgenus Auriculastrum, and outgroups, reconstructed their cpDNA phylogeny with maximum parsimony, and determined branch support with bootstrap frequencies and Bayesian posterior probabilities. Strongly supported conclusions include the (1) paraphyly of Primula subgenus Auriculastrum with respect to a mono- phyletic Dodecatheon, (2) sister relationship between the North American Dodecatheon and the Californian P. suffrutescens, (3) novel basal split in Dodecatheon to produce one clade with rugose and one clade with smooth anther connectives, (4) monophyly of all sections of Primula subgenus Auriculastrum, and (5) exclusion of the enigmatic Primula section Amethystina from the similar Primula subgenus Auriculastrum. These results support the origin of the monomorphic, buzz-pollinated ¯ower of Dodecatheon from the heterostylous ¯ower of Primula. We marshal evidence to support the novel hypothesis that the solanoid ¯ower of Dodecatheon represents the ®xation of recessive alleles at the heterostyly linkage group (pin phenotype). Of the remaining traits associated with their solanoid ¯owers, we recognize at least six likely to have arisen with the origin of Dodecatheon, one that preceded it (¯ower coloration, a transfer exaptation in Dodecatheon), and one that followed it (rugose anther connectives, an adaptation to buzz pollination).
    [Show full text]