DOCSLIB.ORG

Opinion No 222: Implementation of the Azerbaijan's Commitments To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opinion No 222: Implementation of the Azerbaijan's Commitments To OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms OPINION NO.222 Implementati on of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms 1 OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms Azerbaijan’s capital, Baku ahead of Eurovision Song Contest 2012. Photo: Eurofesti val 2 OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................5 Summary ...................................................................................................................................6 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................8 Introduction ............................................................................................................................11 Part One: Crackdown on rights envisaged in Opinion No. 222 ..............................................13 Chapter One: Silencing Whistleblowers .............................................................15 Chapter Two: Human Rights Ombudsman .........................................................18 Chapter Three: Legal repression of free expression ...........................................19 Chapter Four: State control over broadcast media ............................................22 Chapter Five: An NGO ‘Witch Hunt’ ...................................................................23 Part Two: Keeping PACE with rights abuses ...........................................................................25 Chapter One: “There can be no political prisoners in any member state of the Council of Europe” .....................................................28 Chapter Two: “We should give a chance to a new president” ...........................37 Chapter Three: “Too much tension in the state machinery”..............................42 Chapter Four: Hope against hope ......................................................................50 Chapter Five: Is the glass half empty or half full? ..............................................58 Chapter Six: 2008 Presidential election: “a new touchstone” ............................64 Chapter Seven: “2010 Elections: The opportunity to issue a driving license for the highway of democracy is not to be missed” ...............................70 Chapter Eight: “Go Ahead” for Repression ........................................................78 Part Three: Challenge for the Commissioner .........................................................................85 Part Four: The Venice Commission: A box-ticking exercise ...................................................91 Part Five: Azerbaijan in the mirror of the European Court of Human Rights ........................97 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................103 3 OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms Acronyms ANS – Azerbaijan News Service APA – Azeri-Press Agency AzTV – Azerbaijani Television BTC – Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan CIS – Commonwealth of Independent States ECHR – European Conventi on on Human Rights ECtHR – European Court of Human Rights EPP/CD – Group of the European People’s Party at the Council of Europe EU – European Union ICCPR – Internati onal Covenant on Civil and Politi cal Rights IRFS – Insti tute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety JSC – Joint Stock Company LRAD – Long Range Acousti c Device MP – Member of Parliament NATO – North Atlanti c Treaty Organizati on PACE – Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe POC – Prisoner of Conscience RFE/RL – Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty NGO – Non-Governmental Organizati on NTRC – Nati onal Television and Radio Council ODIHR – Offi ce for Democrati c Insti tuti ons and Human Rights OGP – Open Governance Partnership OSCE – Organizati on for Security and Co-operati on in Europe PACE – Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe SOC – Socialist Group UN – United Nati ons YAP – Yeni Azerbaijan Party 4 OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms Acknowledgements This report is a publicati on of the Insti tute for Reporters’ Freedom and Safety (IRFS). The report was writt en by Gulnara Akhundova, program manager for Internati onal Media Support (IMS), based on research she conducted with IRFS researchers Ruslan Aliyev, Parviz Azizov and Gunay Ismayilova, as well as IRFS CEO and Chairman Emin Huseynov. It was edited by human rights consultant Rebecca Vincent. A condensed version of this report will also be published as part of a broader IRFS report examining Azerbaijan’s implementati on of its hu- man rights commitments with various internati onal organizati ons. This report has been published thanks to generous support from Internati onal Media Support (IMS). 5 OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms Summary The Assembly considers that Azerbaijan is moving towards a democrati c, pluralist society in which human rights and the rule of law are respected, and, in accordance with Arti cle 4 of the Statute of the Council of Europe, is able and willing to conti nue the democrati c reforms initi ated in order to bring its enti re legislati on and practi ce into conformity with the prin- ciples and standards of the Council of Europe. Opinion No. 222 (2000)1 More than 12 years aft er Azerbaijan’s accession to the Council of Europe, and on the eve of Azerbaijan’s chairmanship of the Committ ee of Ministers, the Council of Europe remains an important organizati on for Azerbaijan. The Council of Europe gives Azerbaijan the opportunity to parti cipate fully, and on an equal footi ng with other member states, to cooperate with Europe in the fi eld of human rights, rule of law and democracy. Accession has above all enabled Azerbaijan to take part in debates and to have its voice heard. Through accession, Azerbaijan has been off ered the opportunity to share its experience with other countries and to parti cipate closely in defi ning norms with regard to human rights, rule of law and democracy, at the European level. When Azerbaijan joined the Council of Europe on 25 January 2001, it agreed not only to honor the obligati ons incumbent on all member states under Arti cle 3 of the organizati on’s Statute,2 but also to a number of specifi c commitments, set out in Opinion No. 222 (2000) on Azerbaijan’s applicati on for membership of the Council of Europe. Despite hopes that accession to the Council of Europe in 2001 would have had a signifi cant infl uence on the development of fundamental rights within the country, Azerbaijani citi zens conti nue to suff er diverse forms of repression and violati ons that aff ect nearly the enti re spectrum of their human rights. The Azerbaijani authoriti es conti nue to act in blatant disregard to their commitments, which were the basis of Opinion No. 222 (2000) on Azerbaijan’s request for membership. 1 Opinion No. 222. (2000) Azerbaijan’s application for membership in the Council of Europe. http://assembly.coe. int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta00/EOPI222.htm 2 Statute of the Council of Europe, London, 5.V.1949 http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/001.htm 6 OPINION NO.222 Implementation of Azerbaijan’s commitments to the Council of Europe in the fi eld of fundamental freedoms On 28 June 2000, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) adopted Opinion No. 222 (2000) on Azerbaijan’s request for membership of the Council of Europe. On the basis of a list of commitments entered into by Azerbaijan, signed by the President of Azerbaijan and the Speaker of the Azerbaijani Parliament, and a number of expectati ons formulated by the Assembly, it was recommended that Azerbaijan be invited to become a member of the Council of Europe. PACE took its decision on the basis of specifi c commitments undertaken by the Azerbaijani government in a document signed by then-President of Azerbaijan Heydar Aliyev and the Speaker of the Azerbaijani Parliament, and a list of clearly formulated expectati ons. IRFS notes with dismay that the Azerbaijani authoriti es have since acted in blatant disregard of their commitments. The repressive measures taken against the media and criti cal voices, and the adopti on of draconian pieces of legislati on that contradict internati onal standards have cast severe doubt on their good faith. The transfer of power from Heydar Aliyev to his son, Ilham Aliyev, who was elected president in October 2003, raised hopes that the Soviet-style regime would become more moderate. However, Ilham Aliyev disappointed these hopes, despite his rhetoric on the need to cooperate with the West, including the Council of Europe, the EU, and NATO, and enact reform to comply with European standards, and has in- stead conti nued many of his father’s practi ces, including his strategy of authoritarian rule. Internati onal assessments of the degree of democrati zati on, such as, inter alia, Freedom House rankings, and Human Rights Watch and Amnesty Internati onal reports, in fact found that the Azerbaijani government
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PACE Discussions on the Removal of Sanctions Affecting the Russian
    Petra De Sutter, Chairperson, Committee on Institutional Affairs, Parliamentary Assembly Rules of Procedure, Immunities and of the Council of Europe Institutional Affairs, Parliamentary Assembly Vladyslav Golub, Member, Committee on of the Council of Europe Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Serhii Kiral, First Vice-Chairperson, Institutional Affairs, Parliamentary Assembly Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities of the Council of Europe and Institutional Affairs, Parliamentary Morgens Jensen, Member, Committee on Assembly of the Council of Europe Rules of Procedure, Immunities and Mart Ven, Second Vice-Chairperson, Institutional Affairs, Parliamentary Assembly Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities of the Council of Europe and Institutional Affairs – Chairperson, Dutch Haluk Koc, Member, Committee on Rules of National Delegation, Parliamentary Assembly Procedure, Immunities and Institutional of the Council of Europe Affairs, Parliamentary Assembly of the Ingjerd Schou, Third Vice-Chairperson, Council of Europe Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities Edward Leigh, Member, Committee on Rules and Institutional Affairs – Chairperson, of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional Norwegian National Delegation, Parliamentary Affairs, Parliamentary Assembly of the Assembly of the Council of Europe Council of Europe Thorhildur Sunna Aevarsdottir, Member, Michael Link, Member, Committee on Rules Committee on Rules of Procedure, Immunities of Procedure, Immunities and Institutional and Institutional Affairs, Parliamentary Affairs, Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Debacle: the Pace Debate on 23 January 2013
    AZERBAIJAN DEBACLE: THE PACE DEBATE ON 23 JANUARY 2013 Christoph Straesser Pedro Agramunt Berlin 11 February 2013 CAST OF CHARACTERS JEAN-CLAUDE MIGNON, PACE PRESIDENT (FRANCE) ........................................................................................... 5 PEDRO AGRAMUNT (SPAIN) ......................................................................................................................................... 5 CHRISTOPH STRAESSER (GERMANY) .......................................................................................................................... 6 ANNE BRASSEUR (LUXEMBOURG) ............................................................................................................................... 8 ROBERT WALTER (UNITED KINGDOM) ..................................................................................................................... 9 LUCA VOLONTE (ITALY) .............................................................................................................................................. 10 VIOLA VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL (GERMANY) ....................................................................................................... 11 LISE CHRISTOFFERSEN (NORWAY) ........................................................................................................................... 12 JEAN-MARIE BOCKEL (FRANCE) ............................................................................................................................... 13 MARINA SCHUSTER (GERMANY) ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Foreign Relations Committee
    SENATE OF PAKISTAN PAKISTAN WORLDVIEW Report - 21 SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE Visit to Azerbaijan December, 2008 http://www.foreignaffairscommittee.org List of Contents 1. From the Chairman’s Desk 5 2. Executive Summary 9-14 3. Members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Delegation to Azerbaijan 17 4. Verbatim record of the meetings held in Azerbaijan: Meeting with Pakistan-Azerbaijan Friendship Group 21-24 Meeting with Permanent Commission of the Milli Mejlis for International and Inter-Parliamentary Relations 25-26 Meeting with Permanent Commission of the Milli Mejlis for Social Affairs 27 Meeting with Permanent Commission of the Milli Mejlis for Security and Defence 28-29 Meeting with Chairman of the Milli Mejlis (National Assembly) 30-34 Meeting with Vice Chairman of New Azerbaijan Party 35-37 Meeting with Minister for Industry and Energy 38-40 Meeting with President of the Republic of Azerbaijan 41-44 Meeting with the Foreign Minister 45-47 Meeting with the Prime Minister of Azerbaijan 48-50 5. Appendix: Pakistan - Azerbaijan Relations 53-61 Photo Gallery of the Senate Foreing Relations Committee Visit to Azerbaijan 65-66 6. Profiles: Profiles of the Chairman and Members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 69-76 Profiles of the Committee Officials 79-80 03 Visit to Azerbaijan From the Chairman’s Desk The Report on Senate Foreign Relations Committee visit to Azerbaijan is of special significance. Azerbaijan emerged as an independent country in 1991 with the breakup of Soviet Union, along with five other Central Asian states. Pakistan recognized it shortly after its independence and opened diplomatic relations with resident ambassadors in the two capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • PNABZ770.Pdf
    I • • I • I • • • • COMPENDIUM OF STATEMENTS FROM POLITICAL PARTIES ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS • OF NOVEMBER 12, 1995 REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN • • COMPENDIUM OF STATEMENTS FROM POLITICAL PARTIES ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS OF NOVEMBER 12, 1995 REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN December 15, 1995 • • • • • (THE BALLOT) A3aPBAJ'i.AH PECIIYBJIBKACLI MHJIJIII MaltlJIHCHHa CE'IKwi9P.n;a '"tJ'.ox~TJibl ~H .nfuaciI Y3Pa ·cacBEPM:a yqm - ·. .. CEqKH 6YJIJIETEHH ··12· BOja6p 1995-Q HJI ~PSA.NAH lE.\\OKPATHK OCTBfJIAJI UAPTHJACbl 1aJU1<1>5A CblPACbl HJla) A..'gp6AJ~AH .lf.'i110KPAT CAhR6KAP JIAP flAPTHJACbl ~3aP6AJ'ofAH ,\\HJIJIH l168JldT'IHJl.HK IlAPTHJACbl n..1.1P6AJ'UH MHJUIH HCTHrJIAJI DAPTHJACbl ~~P6AJ't\H HAMHffd A.. 'IJARC• DAPTHJACbl ~~ .~~AJ'IAH XAJJf 'ld6hdCH DAPTHJACbl JJll g'Jdff DAPTHJAChl • Bl AJaP&AJ'IAH DAPTHJACli . ·-. .. .. caCBEP1'"a ~AMA.HY.5H.P.il31f 'IOX CHJA.CJI. llAPTHJAHblH (elt.l:.V.11' nU'f11JiUIAP 1iJIOK>'H¥ff;) • • i\llbl Hbfff CAXiiJA°R.lllllflil 6YJIJl'ETEH· E'T116APClitJ.. CAJblJI blP • • National Democratic Institute For International Affairs conducting nonpartisan international programs to help promote, maintain and strengthen democratic institutions 1717 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20036 (202) 328-3136 FAX (202) 939-3166 E-MAIL: [email protected] Chairman Paul G. Kirk, Jr. The National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI) is a Vice Chair Rachelle Horowitz nongovernmental and nonprofit organization conducting nonpartisan international Secretary programs to promote and strengthen democratic institutions around the world. Kenneth F. Melley Working with political parties, civic organizations and parliaments, NDI has Treasurer Hartina Flournoy sponsored political development projects in more than 60 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Baku Dialoguesbaku Dialogues Policy Perspectives on the Silk Road Region
    BAKU DIALOGUESBAKU DIALOGUES POLICY PERSPECTIVES ON THE SILK ROAD REGION Vol. 4 | No. 1 | Fall 2020 Silk Road Region as Global Keystone? Geopolitics & Connectivity in the Heart of the World Between Eurasia and the Middle East Geopolitical Keystone Svante Cornell Nikolas K. Gvosdev Against ‘the Blob’ Not A Top European Priority Michael A. Reynolds Amanda Paul Five-Star Hubs Eurasia, the Hegemon, and the Three Sovereigns Taleh Ziyadov Pepe Escobar Silk Road Pathways Completing the Southern Gas Corridor Yu Hongjun Akhmed Gumbatov Taking Stock of Regional Quandaries The Karabakh Peace Process Dennis Sammut Iran’s Longstanding Cooperation with Armenia Brenda Shaffer The OSCE and Minorities in the Silk Road Region Lamberto Zannier Profile in Leadership Zbigniew Brzezinski: My Friendship with America’s Geopolitical Sage Hafiz Pashayev Baku Dialogues Interview Strategic Equilibrium: Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Hikmat Hajiyev 1 Vol. 4 | No. 1 | Fall 2020 ISSN Print: 2709-1848 ISSN Online: 2709-1856 BAKU DIALOGUES BAKU DIALOGUESBAKU DIALOGUES POLICY PERSPECTIVES ON THE SILK ROAD REGION Vol. 4 | No. 1 | Fall 2020 Silk Road Region as Global Keystone? Geopolitics & Connectivity in the Heart of the World Between Eurasia and the Middle East Geopolitical Keystone Svante Cornell Nikolas K. Gvosdev Against ‘the Blob’ Not A Top European Priority Michael A. Reynolds Amanda Paul Five-Star Hubs Eurasia, the Hegemon, and the Three Sovereigns Taleh Ziyadov Pepe Escobar Silk Road Pathways Completing the Southern Gas Corridor Yu Hongjun Akhmed Gumbatov Taking Stock of Regional Quandaries The Karabakh Peace Process Dennis Sammut Iran’s Longstanding Cooperation with Armenia Brenda Shaffer The OSCE and Minorities in the Silk Road Region Lamberto Zannier Profile in Leadership Zbigniew Brzezinski: My Friendship with America’s Geopolitical Sage Hafiz Pashayev Baku Dialogues Interview Strategic Equilibrium: Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy Hikmat Hajiyev Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan
    Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien No. 107 – March 2010 The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study By Andreas Heinrich Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen Klagenfurter Straße 3, 28359 Bremen, Germany phone +49 421 218-69601, fax +49 421 218-69607 http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Arbeitspapiere und Materialien – Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen No. 107: Andreas Heinrich The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study March 2010 ISSN: 1616-7384 About the author: Andreas Heinrich is a researcher at the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen. This working paper has been produced within the research project ‘The Energy Sector and the Political Stability of Regimes in the Caspian Area: A Comparison of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan’, which is being conducted by the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen from April 2009 until April 2011 with financial support from the Volkswagen Foundation. Language editing: Hilary Abuhove Style editing: Judith Janiszewski Layout: Matthias Neumann Cover based on a work of art by Nicholas Bodde Opinions expressed in publications of the Research Centre for East European Studies are solely those of the authors. This publication may not be reprinted or otherwise reproduced—entirely or in part—without prior consent of the Research Centre for East European Studies or without giving credit to author and source. © 2010 by Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Publikationsreferat Klagenfurter Str. 3 28359 Bremen – Germany phone: +49 421 218-69601 fax: +49 421 218-69607 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Baku
    Draft program Azerbaijan Ministry of Education Azerbaijan University of Languages University of Antwerp ENHANCING ACADEMIC QUALITY ASSURANCE: NEEDS AND CHALLENGES International Conference Baku, Azerbaijan 10 April 2008 9 April 2008 20.00 Dinner 10 April 2008 9.00 – 10.00 Registration - Coffee 10.00 – 12.00 Plenary session: 10.00 – 10.10 Welcoming address: Prof. Samad Seyidov, President of Azerbaijan University of Languages 10.10 - 10.40 Speech: Professor Misir Mardanov, Minister of Education of Azerbaijan 10.45 - 11.10 Keynote address: Professor Jan De Groof, Government Commissioner for Universities (Belgium), Professor at the College of Europe (Bruges) and TIAS (University of Tilburg, the Netherlands), President of the European Association for Education Law and Policy, chargé de mission to UNESCO for the right to education. 11.10 - 11.35 Universities in post-Soviet Azerbaijan: democratization and good governance. Speech by Prof. Samad Seyidov, Rector of Azerbaijan University of Languages, Chairman of the Azerbaijani Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Vice President of the Council pf Europe 11.35 - 12.00 The Bologna Process and the Turkish Experience. Speech by Prof. Selahettin Dikmen, Advisor on Education of the Embassy of Turkey in Azerbaijan 12.00 - 13.00 Lunch (Aquapark Restaurant) 13.00-14.30 Panel Discussion 1: Implementing Academic Quality Assurance in Azerbaijan: Environmental Scanning and Potential of Universities Chairs: Prof. Jan De Groof and Dr. Natig Yusifov Presentations: 13.00 - 13.15 Criteria for External Assessment of Universities within the framework of Bologna requirements: Prof. Ilham Mustafayev, Head of the Higher Education Department, Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan Republic 13.15 - 13.30 Implementing Academic Quality Assurance in Azerbaijan: utilization of internal resources: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • International Protection Considerations Regarding Azerbaijani Asylum-Seekers and Refugees
    International Protection Considerations Regarding Azerbaijani Asylum-Seekers and Refugees United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Geneva September 2003 Department of International Protection 1 Protection Information Section TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 3 II. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 3 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ON AZERBAIJAN..................................................................... 3 1.1. General Information on Nagorno-Karabakh .................................................. 9 2. THE POLITICAL CONTEXT AND ACTORS SINCE 2001................................................... 10 2.1. Referendum, August 2002 ............................................................................. 12 2.2. Presidential Elections – October 2003, Outlook .......................................... 13 2.3. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Peace Initiatives Since 1999............. 14 2.4. Regional Implications ................................................................................... 20 2.5. Internally Displaced Persons........................................................................ 21 3. REVIEW OF THE GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION IN AZERBAIJAN...................... 22 3.1. Freedom of Movement................................................................................... 24 3.2. Organized Crime..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijani Women, Online Mediatized Activism and Offline Mass Mobilization
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Social Sciences. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Mehrabov, I. (2016) Azerbaijani Women, Online Mediatized Activism and Offline Mass Mobilization. Social Sciences, 5(4): 1-17 https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5040060 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-46451 social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Azerbaijani Women, Online Mediatized Activism and Offline Mass Mobilization Ilkin Mehrabov Geography, Media and Communication Studies, Karlstad University, Universitetsgatan 2, Karlstad 65188, Sweden; [email protected] Academic Editor: Martin J. Bull Received: 25 May 2016; Accepted: 1 October 2016; Published: 12 October 2016 Abstract: Despite its post-Soviet history, Azerbaijan is an under-investigated country in academic research—compared with the other former constituencies, such as the Baltic countries or Russia, of the USSR—and gender questions of the contemporary Azerbaijani society are even less touched on. Within the current context of the post-“Arab Spring” era of mediatized connectivity and collective political engagement, this article looks into and analyzes how Azerbaijani women participate in different online and offline social and political movements, and if (and how) they are impeded by the increased state authoritarianism in Azerbaijan. Using data, obtained from online
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion in Azerbaijan ·1998
    PUBLIC OPINION IN AZERBAIJAN ·1998 Design and Analysis by Steven Wagner QEV Analytics PUBLIC OPINION IN AZERBAIJAN 1998 Design and Analysis by Steven Wagner QEV Analytics .... Survey Implemented by , The International Foundation for Election Systems With Funding Provided by , The United States Agency for International Development , , , , - .. i Second Printing 1 1__________________________________ ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION •••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•.•.••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 KEY CONSTITUENCIES IN AzERBAIJAN ••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 SIX DIMENSIONS OF AzERBAIJANI OPINION ••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 7 I. Political Liberalism & Attitudes toward Democracy .............................................................. 7 2. Economic Liberalism & Support for a Market Economy ..................................................... 11 3. Satisfaction with the Performance of Government .............................................................. 15 4. Perceptions of the Current Situation in Azerbaijan ............................................................. 17 5. Perspectives on Change .............................................................................................................. 18 6. Information Consumption & Media Habits ......................................................................... _.19 ... DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Partnership, the Russia-Ukraine War, and The
    The Eastern Partnership, the Russia-Ukraine War, © 2015 IAI and the Impact on the South Caucasus by Amanda Paul 978-88-98650-30-9 SBN ABstract 2280-4341 | I The South Caucasus is a fragmented and security challenged region. Despite hopes that the Eastern Partnership (EaP) would SSN I act as a transformative tool to strengthen democracy, stability, security and regional cooperation, this has not happened. Rather the EaP has produced limited results, with the region today more fragmented than it was five years ago. Russia’s war against Ukraine has further exacerbated the situation RY 2015 RY A as it raised concerns over the extent to which the South Caucasus countries could genuinely rely on the West. Today, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia have different geostrategic trajectories. While Georgia has stuck to the Euro-Atlantic track, Armenia joined the Russian-led Eurasian Union in January 2015. Meanwhile Azerbaijan has the luxury of choosing not to choose. Developments in the region have demonstrated that a one size fits all approach does not work and a more ERs 15 | 06 - FebrU ERs differentiated policy is required. AP NG P I European Union | Eastern Partnership (EaP) | South Caucasus | Russia | Ukraine keywords IAI WORK The Eastern Partnership, the Russia-Ukraine War, and the Impact on the South Caucasus The Eastern Partnership, the Russia-Ukraine War, and the Impact on the South Caucasus by Amanda Paul* © 2015 IAI Introduction The goal of the EU’s Eastern Partnership (EaP), which was launched in 2009, was to bring partner countries closer to the EU through deepened cooperation and integration on the basis of EU values, norms, and standards.1 Five years on, while the EU has deepened ties with all the EaP countries, regional stability and security has been turned upside down as a consequence of Russia pushing back against the efforts of a number of EaP states to deepen ties with the EU, making EU integration a geostrategic choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Report by Mr Mazahir PANAHOV Chair of Central Election Commission of Azerbaijan
    Strasbourg, 29 June 2005 CDL-UD(2005)009 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) with the support of THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION in cooperation with THE SERBIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION, TRANSPARENCY SERBIA and THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE OFFICE IN BELGRADE UNIDEM SEMINAR “ORGANISATION OF ELECTIONS BY AN IMPARTIAL BODY” Belgrade, 24-25 June 2005 Report by Mr Mazahir PANAHOV Chair of Central Election Commission of Azerbaijan This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL-UD(2005)009 - 2 - Introduction 1. Democratic elections are the basis for progressive development of state and civil society in every country. Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan adopted in referendum in 1995, determined major directions for the conduct of transparent and democratic elections and provided legal framework for elections conducted in free and regular manner by secret and personal voting in the basis of general, equal and direct suffrage in Azerbaijan. One of the goals of the leadership of the Republic of Azerbaijan was to make progressive steps in the field of elections. Obvious sample for it is the Election Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan adopted in May of 2003. Election Code was prepared in close cooperation with OSCE/ODIHR and the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe. It was stated in the joint final assessment of the above-mentioned international organizations that the Election Code provides a comprehensive framework for the conduct of elections and referenda and, in most respects, meets international standards.
    [Show full text]