DOCSLIB.ORG

Zhangzidao Scallop Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zhangzidao Scallop Fishery MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION On-Site Surveillance Visit - Report for Zhangzidao Scallop Fishery 1st Surveillance Audit October 2016 Certificate Code F-ACO-0069 Prepared For: Zoneco Group Ltd. Prepared By: Acoura Marine Authors: Paul Knapman, Julian Addison, Allen Li BH (21/10/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report Zhangzidao Scallop Assessment Data Sheet Fishery name Zhangzidao Scallop Species and Stock North Yellow Sea Yesso Scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) Date certified 22nd April 2015 Date of expiry 21st April 2020 Surveillance level and type Level 7 (Normal) – On-site Date of surveillance audit 12th – 14th September 2016 Surveillance stage (tick one) 1st Surveillance 2nd Surveillance 3rd Surveillance 4th Surveillance Other (expedited etc) Surveillance team Lead auditor : Paul Knapman Auditor : Julian Addison Local expert, translator and facilitator: Allen Li Conformity Assessment Body Acoura Marine (CAB) name CAB contact details Address 6 Redheughs Rigg Edinburgh EH12 9DQ Phone/Fax 0131 335 6662 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Polly Burns Client contact details Address Zoneco Group Ltd., 28F Wanda Center, No.6 Ganxing Road, Zhongshan District, Dalian, China Phone/Fax 0411-82659666-8059 Email [email protected] Contact name(s) Wang Yun Page 2 of 31 PK (16/12/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report Zhangzidao Scallop Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Scope of Surveillance ............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Aims of the Surveillance .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Certificate Holder Details ........................................................................................................ 4 Surveillance Process ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Findings of the original assessment ........................................................................................ 5 1.5 Surveillance Activity ................................................................................................................ 5 1.5.1 Surveillance team details ................................................................................................ 5 1.5.2 Date & Location of surveillance audit .............................................................................. 6 1.5.3 What was inspected ........................................................................................................ 6 1.5.4 Stakeholder Consultation ................................................................................................ 6 1.5.5 Stakeholder meetings ..................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Surveillance Standards ........................................................................................................... 6 1.6.1 MSC Standards, Requirements and Guidance used ...................................................... 6 1.6.2 Confirmation that destructive fishing practices or controversial unilateral exemptions have not been introduced ................................................................................................................ 6 2 Fishery Background ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Changes in the management system ..................................................................................... 9 2.2 Changes in relevant regulations.............................................................................................. 9 2.3 Changes to personnel involved in science, management or industry..................................... 9 2.4 Changes to scientific base of information including stock assessments ................................ 9 2.5 Update on enhanced fishery’s position in relation to scope criteria ...................................... 10 2.6 Control and enforcement ....................................................................................................... 12 2.7 Observed fishing operation ................................................................................................... 12 2.8 Any developments or changes within the fishery which impact traceability or the ability to segregate between fish from the UoC and fish from outside the UoC (non-certified fish) ............... 13 2.9 TAC and catch data .............................................................................................................. 14 2.10 Summary of Assessment Conditions .................................................................................... 14 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Condition 1 (UoCs 1, 2, 3, 4) ................................................................................................. 15 3.2 Condition 2 (UoCs 1, 2, 3, 4) ................................................................................................. 16 4 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 18 4.1 Summary of findings ............................................................................................................. 18 5 References ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix 2 - Stakeholder submissions ............................................................................................. 22 Appendix 3 - Surveillance audit information...................................................................................... 28 Appendix 4 - Additional detail on conditions/ actions/ results (if necessary) .................................... 30 Appendix 5 - Revised Surveillance Program .................................................................................... 31 Page 3 of 31 PK (16/12/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report Zhangzidao Scallop 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Surveillance This report outlines the findings of the 1st Annual Surveillance of the Zhangzidao Scallop fishery. The scope of the certified fishery and therefore of this surveillance is specified in the Unit of Certification (UoC) set out below: UoC 1 Wild spat collection using suspended ropes and on-grown in pearl nets, i.e. catch and grow (CAG) UoC 2 Hatchery reared spat on-grown in pearl nets i.e. hatch and catch (HAC) UoC 3 Harvesting of adult scallops using divers UoC 4 Harvesting of adult scallops using dredges 1.2 Aims of the Surveillance The purpose of the annual Surveillance Report is fourfold: 1. to establish and report on whether or not there have been any material changes to the circumstances and practices affecting the original complying assessment of the fishery; 2. to monitor the progress made to improve those practices that have been scored as below “good practice” (a score of 80 or above) but above “minimum acceptable practice” (a score of 60 or above) – as captured in any “conditions” raised and described in the Public Report and in the corresponding Action Plan drawn up by the client; 3. to monitor any actions taken in response to any (non-binding) “recommendations” made in the Public Report; 4. to re-score any Performance Indicators (PIs) where practice or circumstances have materially changed during the intervening year, focusing on those PIs that form the basis of any “conditions” raised. Please note: The primary focus of this surveillance audit is to assess changes made in the previous year. For a complete picture, this report should be read in conjunction with the Public Certification Report for this fishery assessment which can be found here: https://www.msc.org/track-a-fishery/fisheries-in-the-program/certified/pacific/zhangzidao- scallop/assessment-downloads-1/20150413_PCR_SCA326.pdf 1.3 Certificate Holder Details In 2014, the company changed its name from Zhangzidao to Zoneco Group Co., Ltd. The group was established in 1958, and was one of the first fishery companies in China to establish the “sea resources development model”, which promotes fisheries enhancement using an ecological and scientifically based model. The Company attaches great importance to quality control systems and has established a quality assurance and tracing system for the whole process of propagation, cultivation, processing, purification and distribution, resulting in the Company's achievement of the ISO 9001 Quality System Certification, the US FDA Certification on HACCP and MSC Certification in 2015. In addition, all the major products pass the Organic Food Certification standard. To support its fisheries program the Company has established strategic links with the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, the Marine Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Dalian Institute of Fisheries, the Ocean University of China, the Dalian Institute of light Industry, and the Marine and Fisheries Research Institute of Liaoning Province. Page 4 of 31 PK (16/12/15) – Ref FCR 2.0/GCR/2.1 Acoura Marine Surveillance Report Zhangzidao Scallop Surveillance Process
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF FISHING IMPACTS ON HABITAT - SEPTEMBER 2003 UPDATE Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission SEPTEMBER 2003 GSMFC No.: 115 Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update Edited by Jeffrey K. Rester Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission September 2003 Introduction This is the third in a series of updates to the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat originally produced in February 2000. The Commission’s Habitat Subcommittee felt that the gathering of pertinent literature should continue. The third update contains 52 new articles since the publication of the last update. The update uses the same criteria that the original bibliography and first and second updates used to compile articles. It attempts to compile a listing of papers and reports that address the many effects and impacts that fishing can have on habitat and the marine environment. The bibliography is not limited to scientific literature only. It includes technical reports, state and federal agency reports, college theses, conference and meeting proceedings, popular articles, and other forms of nonscientific literature. This was done in an attempt to gather as much information on fishing impacts as possible. Researchers will be able to decide for themselves whether they feel the included information is valuable. Fishing, both recreational and commercial, can have many varying impacts on habitat and the marine environment. Whether a fisher prop scars seagrass, drops an anchor on a coral reef, or drags a trawl across the bottom, each act can alter habitat and affect fish populations.
    [Show full text]
  • White Coral Community
    or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The approval portionthe ofwith any articlepermitted only photocopy by is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution This article has This been published in HERMES SPECIAL ISSUE FEATURE O ceanography , Volume 22, Number 1, a quarterly journal of The 22, Number 1, a quarterly , Volume The O WhITE CORAL ceanography S ociety. ociety. © COMMUNITY The 2009 by in the Central Mediterranean Sea O Revealed by ROV Surveys ceanography O ceanography ceanography S ociety. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. article use for research. and this copy in teaching to granted rights All reserved. is ociety. Permission S ociety. ociety. S end all correspondence to: [email protected] or Th e [email protected] to: correspondence all end BY ANDRÉ FREIWALD, LYDIA BEUCK, ANDRES RÜGGEBERG, MARCO TavIanI, DIERK HEbbELN, O anD R/V METEOR CRUISE M70-1 PARTICIpantS ceanography S ociety, P ociety, O Box 1931, R epublication, systemmatic reproduction, reproduction, systemmatic epublication, R ockville, M D 20849-1931, US A. 58 Oceanography Vol.22, No.1 ABSTRACT. White coral communities consist of scleractinian corals that thrive completed by further ROV dives into the in the ocean’s bathyal depths (~ 200–4000 m). In the Atlantic Ocean, white corals are better-known Apulian deep-water reefs off Santa Maria di Leuca (Tursi et al., known to form complex, three-dimensional structures on the seabed that attract vast 2004; Taviani et al., 2005a).
    [Show full text]
  • MB0117: Understanding the Distribution and Trends in Inshore Fishing Activities and the Link to Coastal Communities
    Cefas contract report C5401 MB0117: Understanding the distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Authors: Koen Vanstaen and Patricia Breen Issue date: 02/12/2014 Cefas Document Control Title: Understanding the distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Submitted to: Carole Kelly, Defra Date submitted: 02/12/2014 Project Manager: Koen Vanstaen Report compiled by: Koen Vanstaen and Patricia Breen Quality control by: Janette Lee Approved by & date: Edmund McManus, 01/12/2014 Version: Final Draft Version Control History Author Date Comment Version KV & PB 26/03/2014 Draft 0.1 JL 28/03/2014 Internal review KV & PB 29/03/2014 Final Draft 1.0 KV 01/12/2014 Final 2.0 Distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Page i Project Title: Understanding the distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Project Code: MB0117 Defra Contract Manager: Leila Fonseca/Carole Kelly, Defra, Marine and Fisheries Science Unit Funded by: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Marine and Fisheries Science Unit Marine Directorate Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Authorship: Koen Vanstaen and Patricia Breen Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Pakefield Road Lowestoft Suffolk NR33 0HT United Kingdom tel: + 44 (0)1502 562244 email: [email protected] www.cefas.co.uk Disclaimer: The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views of Defra, nor is Defra liable for the accuracy of information provided, or responsible for any use of the reports content.
    [Show full text]
  • GFCM Workshop on IUU Fishing in the Mediterranean Sea
    GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES POUR LA MÉDITERRANÉE GFCM Workshop on IUU Fishing in the Mediterranean Sea Tunis, Tunisia, 3-4 October 2013 OPENING AND ARRANGEMENTS OF THE MEETING 1. The “GFCM Workshop on IUU Fishing in the Mediterranean Sea” was held on 3-4 October 2013 in Tunis, Tunisia. The Workshop was attended by 42 experts from GFCM Members, relevant organizations and entities. The list of Participants is provided in Appendix B of this report. 2. Mr Bayram Ozturk, Moderator of the Workshop, called the meeting to order and reminded participants that a workshop germane to the subject matter had been already convened for the Black Sea (Istanbul, Turkey, February 2013). As in the case of the Black Sea, the moderator advocated zero tolerance for IUU fishing in the Mediterranean Sea and called upon all actors involved to cooperate in coming to grips with this scourge. 3. Mr Hachemi Missaoui, from the Tunisian Directorate General of Fisheries and Aquaculture, welcomed participants and expressed his deep concern for the critical situation of Mediterranean stocks. He declared that IUU fishing was directly related to the problem of how best to ensure sustainably managed stocks and that concerted action had to be taken. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA AND INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND MEETING’S OBJECTIVES 4. After the participants had introduced themselves, the GFCM Secretariat recalled that the main objective of the meeting was to identify relevant elements for a roadmap to fight IUU fishing in the Mediterranean Sea. The agenda of the Workshop was subsequently introduced and adopted without amendments (Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE FISHERIES REGULATION SUMMARY As of June 1, 2020
    MARINE FISHERIES REGULATION SUMMARY as of June 1, 2020 Updated by Jared Silva, Policy Analyst This is not an official copy of the Commonwealth’s marine fishery laws and regulations. The information in this document outlines the general laws and regulations governing recreational and commercial fishing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It is not comprehensive. Although every attempt has been made to keep this document accurate and up to date, this is not an official copy of the Commonwealth’s marine fishery laws and regulations, and should not be consulted as such. The closure maps depicted in this document demonstrate certain specific closures but are not inclusive of all closures that may affect a certain fishing activity. Please review official copies of M.G.L. c. 130 and 322 CMR for full and accurate descriptions of marine fisheries laws and regulations. For comprehensive regulations contact the Secretary of State Division of Publications and Regulations and for the statutory text to M.G.L Ch. 130 visit the Massachusetts Legislature’s website (http://www.malegislature.gov). MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES RULES & REGULATIONS SUMMARY (as of June 1, 2020) Refer to Chapter 130 and 322 CMR for details. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FISHERY 3 RECENT REGULATORY CHANGES 7 RECREATIONAL FISHING 8 HOOK AND LINE (includes Rod & Reel) 10 LOBSTERING commercially with Traps in state waters 14 LOBSTERING commercially with Traps - using Student Lobster Permit 18 LOBSTERING commercially with SCUBA in state waters 20 LOBSTERING recreationally with Traps or SCUBA using the Non-Commercial Lobster Permit 23 POTTING for Sea Bass 25 POTTING for Scup 27 POTTING for Whelks 30 FISH WEIRS 31 SINK GILLNETTING (Fishing on or near bottom) 33 SURFACE GILLNETTING (Fishing on or near surface) 35 MOBILE GEAR: Trawls, Scottish/Danish Seines, and Pair Seines – no regulatory fishery endorsements or inshore net 38 MOBILE GEAR: Trawls, Scottish/Danish Seines, and Pair Seines - with small-mesh regulated fishery endorsements.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Environment 2005-2011
    #330 FEBRUARY 2016 Effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine environment 2005-2011 ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 330 FEBRUARY 2016 Effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine environment 2005–2011 Authors Rebecca Walker • Henry Bokuniewicz • David Carlin Ingemar Cato • Chris Dijkshoorn • Annelies De Backer Jan van Dalfsen • Michel Desprez • Lara Howe Bryndis G. Robertsdottir • Marcel Rozemeijer Mark Russell • Ad Stolk International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2016. Effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine environment 2005– 2011. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 330. 206 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5498 Series Editor: Emory D. Anderson The material in this report may be reused for non-commercial purposes using the rec- ommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has ownership. For other third-party material cited in this re- port, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of da- tasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Fishing Regulations
    HAWAI‘I FISHING REGULATIONS August 2015 CONTENTS Regulated marine species . 4 How to measure and determine sex . .14 Scientific names of regulated species . 16 Regulated freshwater species . .18 Regulated fishing areas O‘ahu . .20 Hawai‘i . 28 Kaua‘i. .39 Maui . 46 Lāna‘i . .49 Moloka‘i . .51 Other management areas . .52 Northwestern Hawaiian Islands . .53 Gear restrictions . 54 Special provisions, licenses, permits . .57 Commercial fishing . .58 Bottom fishing . .59 Sharks and manta rays . 62 David Y. Ige, Governor Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) . 62 Division of Aquatic Resources (DAR) offices . .63 To report violations . .63 What’s new in this revision O‘ahu: New rules pertain to aquarium fishing (p. 55). BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES Maui: New minimum size and bag limit rules pertain to all parrotfish and goat- fish species (pp. 4-7). Hā‘ena, Kaua‘i: New Community Based Subsistence Fishing area established Suzanne D. Case, Chairperson (p. 44). This information is presented to acquaint sport and commercial fishermen with Members State laws and rules pertaining to fishing in Hawai‘i. It is not to be used as a legal document. Failure to include complete statutes or administrative rules in this summary does not relieve persons from abiding by those statutes and Keith "Keone" Downing James A. Gomes rules. Any discrepancies between this summary and the statutes or rules from which it was prepared will be enforced and adjudicated according to the official statutes and rules in effect on the date the activity took place. The full text of Thomas Oi Stanley H. Roehrig the statutes and rules is available for review at most public libraries in the State and at Division of Aquatic Resources (DAR) and Division of Conservation and Ulalia Woodside Christopher Yuen Resources Enforcement (DOCARE) offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch1: Study of Discharges Incidental to Normal Operation of Commercial
    Disclaimer The Draft Report to Congress: Study of Discharges Incidental to Normal Operation of Commercial Fishing Vessels and Other Non- Recreational Vessels less than 79 feet has been signed by EPA. EPA is announcing this report in the Federal Register. While we've taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the report, it's not the official version. Upon publication you will be able to obtain the official copy of this notice at www.epa.gov/npdes/vessels/reportcongress.cfm or at the Federal Register Web site. Proposed Draft CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE REPORT 1.1. CONGRESSIONAL STUDY CHARGE On July 31, 2008, Public Law (P.L.) 110-2991 was signed into law. It provides a two-year moratorium for nonrecreational vessels less than 79 feet in length and all commercial fishing vessels regardless of length, from the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)2 program to obtain a permit for discharges incidental to the normal operation of those vessels.3 Additionally, P.L. 110-299 directs the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to study the environmental impacts of discharges incidental to the normal operation of those vessels. Specifically, the law directs the agency to study and evaluate the impacts of: (1) Any discharge of effluent from properly functioning marine engines (2) Any discharge of laundry, shower, and galley sink wastes (3) Any other discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel Congress mandated that EPA include the following elements in the study: (1) Characterizations of the nature, type, and composition of the discharges for: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Amendment 9 Final Environmental Impact Statement (Feis)
    Revised 11/16/2018 Coral Habitat Areas Considered for Habitat Area of Particular Concern Designation in the Gulf of Mexico Final Amendment 9 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Coral and Coral Reefs of the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. Waters Including Final Environmental Impact Statement November 2018 This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA15NMF4410011. This page intentionally left blank GULF OF MEXICO CORAL AMENDMENT 9 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FEIS) Abstract: This FEIS is prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act to assess the environmental impacts associated with a regulatory action. The FEIS analyzes the impacts of a reasonable range of alternatives intended to protect significant coral communities in the Gulf of Mexico, their habitat, and the species that rely on that habitat. Responsible Agencies: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management National Marine Fisheries Service Council (Lead Agency) 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100 Southeast Regional Office Tampa, Florida 33607 263 13th Avenue South 813-348-1630 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 813-348-1711 (fax) 727-824-5305 http://www.gulfcouncil.org 727-824-5308 (fax) Contact: Morgan Kilgour http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov [email protected] Contact: Lauren Waters [email protected] Type of Action ( ) Administrative ( ) Legislative ( ) Draft (X) Final Filing Dates with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare EIS published:
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitiat-September
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF FISHING IMPACTS ON HABITAT - SEPTEMBER 2003 UPDATE Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission SEPTEMBER 2003 GSMFC No.: 115 Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update Edited by Jeffrey K. Rester Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission September 2003 Introduction This is the third in a series of updates to the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat originally produced in February 2000. The Commission’s Habitat Subcommittee felt that the gathering of pertinent literature should continue. The third update contains 52 new articles since the publication of the last update. The update uses the same criteria that the original bibliography and first and second updates used to compile articles. It attempts to compile a listing of papers and reports that address the many effects and impacts that fishing can have on habitat and the marine environment. The bibliography is not limited to scientific literature only. It includes technical reports, state and federal agency reports, college theses, conference and meeting proceedings, popular articles, and other forms of nonscientific literature. This was done in an attempt to gather as much information on fishing impacts as possible. Researchers will be able to decide for themselves whether they feel the included information is valuable. Fishing, both recreational and commercial, can have many varying impacts on habitat and the marine environment. Whether a fisher prop scars seagrass, drops an anchor on a coral reef, or drags a trawl across the bottom, each act can alter habitat and affect fish populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Location Guidance.Pdf
    PART 2: REGIONAL LOCATIONAL GUIDANCE FOR MARINE ENERGY 101 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION TO REGIONAL LOCATIONAL GUIDANCE FOR MARINE ENERGY FOCUS OF THE REGIONAL LOCATIONAL GUIDANCE (RLG) FOR MARINE 100m. It is recognised that depths greater than 60m may be a current ENERGY economic/practical limit for seabed tidal devices, but deeper deployments may be viable. Wave devices are capable of significantly greater water depth deployment The Regional Locational Guidance (RLG) for Marine energy (wave and tidal due to the use of moorings. stream energy) has been prepared in support of the MSP Framework and the rapid increase in interest in the development of wave and tidal energy within the Tidal devices operating in water depths of less than 30m may be feasible in areas Pentland Firth. where vessel movements may be excluded or where development of the device results in a very low height requirement. The aims of the RLG are twofold: Bathymetry information has been obtained from UKHO admiralty chart data 1. Provide guidance to marine renewable energy developers on potential (Seazone). Given the age and limited sounding information used to form these areas of opportunity for future development and to highlight likely requirements for charts, it is likely that there are areas where the actual bathymetry may vary surveys, monitoring or interactions with existing uses that may be issues for significantly from that currently recorded. development. Tidal current information has been based on a hydrodynamic model operated by 2. Progress the marine spatial planning process in a way which enables Metoc based on a 200m rectilinear grid. The model is adequate for identifying the stakeholders and decision makers to respond to the rapid increase in interest in main resource areas but may be too coarse for the inter-island areas with narrow marine renewable energy developments whilst enabling ‘issues’ relating to other channels and poorly resolved bathymetry data.
    [Show full text]
  • Studland to Portland Possible Special Area of Conservation (Psac) Appropriate Assessment Mussel Seed Fishery 2012
    Studland to Portland Possible Special Area of Conservation (pSAC) Appropriate Assessment Mussel Seed Fishery 2012 Title Portland Mussel (Mytilus edulis) Seed Fishery Location West and South of the Shambles, Portland Nature/description of Purpose the plan or project The purpose of the existing activity is to remove commercial quantities of seed mussel (Mytilus edulis) from the fishery with minimal and non-significant impact to the designated site. Description Seed mussels (Mytilus edulis) are removed from the fishery by the use of steel framed dredges with a mesh collection bag, operated from a vessel, as defined in Southern IFCA ‘Fishing for oysters, mussels and clams’ byelaw. Fishing for seed mussel within the Southern IFCA district may only take place with the Chief Officer’s consent as detailed in the Southern IFCA ‘Mussels’ byelaw. Date recorded 24th April 2012 This is a record of the appropriate assessment, required by Regulation 48 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) Regulations 1994, undertaken by Southern Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority (SIFCA) in respect of the above plan or project, in accordance with the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC). Having considered that the plan or project may have a significant effect on the Studland to Portland possible Special Area of Conservation (pSAC) and that the plan or project is not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site, an Appropriate Assessment has been undertaken of the potential impacts of the proposed fishery in view of the pSAC integrity and conservation. 1. Studland to Portland pSAC will be designated because: 1.1 The site comprises a mosaic of two areas containing Annex I reef habitat.
    [Show full text]