DOCSLIB.ORG

Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Environment 2005-2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effects of Extraction of Marine Sediments on the Marine Environment 2005-2011 #330 FEBRUARY 2016 Effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine environment 2005-2011 ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 330 FEBRUARY 2016 Effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine environment 2005–2011 Authors Rebecca Walker • Henry Bokuniewicz • David Carlin Ingemar Cato • Chris Dijkshoorn • Annelies De Backer Jan van Dalfsen • Michel Desprez • Lara Howe Bryndis G. Robertsdottir • Marcel Rozemeijer Mark Russell • Ad Stolk International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2016. Effects of extraction of marine sediments on the marine environment 2005– 2011. ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 330. 206 pp. https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5498 Series Editor: Emory D. Anderson The material in this report may be reused for non-commercial purposes using the rec- ommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has ownership. For other third-party material cited in this re- port, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of da- tasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other repro- duction requests please contact the General Secretary. This document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the view of the Council. Cover image: © OCEANA/Carlos Suárez ISBN 978-87-7482-179-3 ISSN 2707-7144 © 2016 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Contributors .............................................................................................. 2 1.3 Recommendations .................................................................................... 2 Recommendations from Section 4 .......................................................... 2 Recommendations from Section 5 .......................................................... 3 Recommendations from Section 6 .......................................................... 3 2 Review of the quantity, quality, location, and uses of extracted marine sediments ................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Extraction of marine sediments .............................................................. 4 2.2 Sustainable use of aggregate resources ................................................. 4 2.2.1 Uses of marine sediments .......................................................... 6 2.2.2 Construction ................................................................................ 7 2.2.3 Construction fill and land reclamation .................................... 7 2.2.4 Coastal protection ....................................................................... 8 2.2.5 Other uses .................................................................................... 9 2.3 Marine aggregate resources .................................................................. 10 2.4 Review of ICES Member Country activity .......................................... 12 2.4.1 Belgium ...................................................................................... 12 2.4.2 Canada ....................................................................................... 13 2.4.3 Denmark .................................................................................... 13 2.4.4 Estonia ........................................................................................ 14 2.4.5 Finland ....................................................................................... 14 2.4.6 France ......................................................................................... 14 2.4.7 Germany .................................................................................... 15 2.4.8 Greenland and the Faroes ....................................................... 16 2.4.9 Iceland ........................................................................................ 16 2.4.10 Ireland ........................................................................................ 16 2.4.11 Latvia .......................................................................................... 16 2.4.12 Lithuania .................................................................................... 16 2.4.13 The Netherlands ....................................................................... 16 2.4.14 Norway ...................................................................................... 17 2.4.15 Poland ........................................................................................ 18 2.4.16 Portugal ...................................................................................... 18 2.4.17 Russia ......................................................................................... 18 2.4.18 Spain ........................................................................................... 18 2.4.19 Sweden ....................................................................................... 18 2.4.20 United Kingdom ....................................................................... 18 2.4.21 United States ............................................................................. 19 2.5 Management of aggregate dredging activities ................................... 20 2.5.1 Electronic monitoring systems ............................................... 21 2.6 Dredging technology.............................................................................. 25 2.7 Summary .................................................................................................. 27 3 Seabed sediment (resource) mapping programmes of ICES Member Countries ............................................................................................ 28 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 28 3.2 Review of ICES Member Country seabed mapping .......................... 28 3.2.1 Belgium ...................................................................................... 30 3.2.2 Canada ....................................................................................... 34 3.2.3 Denmark .................................................................................... 34 3.2.4 Estonia ........................................................................................ 36 3.2.5 Finland ....................................................................................... 41 3.2.6 France ......................................................................................... 43 3.2.7 Germany .................................................................................... 48 3.2.8 Ireland ........................................................................................ 49 3.2.9 Latvia .......................................................................................... 56 3.2.10 Lithuania .................................................................................... 60 3.2.11 The Netherlands ....................................................................... 65 3.2.12 Norway ...................................................................................... 69 3.2.13 Poland ........................................................................................ 70 3.2.14 Portugal ...................................................................................... 76 3.2.15 Russian Federation ................................................................... 81 3.2.16 Spain ........................................................................................... 81 3.2.17 Sweden ....................................................................................... 87 3.2.18 United Kingdom ....................................................................... 94 3.2.19 United States ............................................................................. 96 4 Effects of extraction on the marine environment ........................................ 99 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 99 4.2 Research programmes .......................................................................... 100 4.2.1 The Aggregate Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) – UK .... 100 4.2.2 Suivi des Impacts de l'Extraction de Granulats Marins (SIEGMA) – France ................................................................. 101 4.2.3 Building with Nature Programme (Ecoshape) – The Netherlands ..................................................................... 101 4.2.4 MEP: Rijkswaterstaat, LaMER, and Sand Engine – The Netherlands ..................................................................... 101 4.3 Physical effects .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ystad Sweden Jazz Festival 2018!
    VÄLKOMMEN TILL/WELCOME TO YSTAD SWEDEN JAZZ FESTIVAL 2018! Kära jazzvänner! Dear friends, Vi känner stor glädje över att för nionde gången kunna presentera It is with great pleasure that we present, for the ninth time, en jazzfestival med många spännande och intressanta konserter. a jazz festival with many exciting and interesting concerts – a mix Megastjärnor och legendarer samsas med unga blivande stjärnor. of megastars, legends and young stars of tomorrow. As in 2017, we Liksom 2017 använder vi Ystad Arena för konserter vilket möjliggör will use Ystad Arena as a venue to enable more people to experience för fler att uppleva musiken. I år erbjuder vi 44 konserter med drygt the concerts. This year we will present over 40 concerts featuring 200 artister och musiker. Tillsammans med Ystads kommun fortsätter more than 200 artists and musicians. In cooperation with Ystad vi den viktiga satsningen på jazz för barn, JazzKidz. Barnkonserterna Municipality, we are continuing the important music initiative for ges på Ystads stadsbibliotek. Tre konserter ges på Solhällan i Löderup. children, JazzKidz. The concerts for children will be held at Ystad Bered er på en magisk upplevelse den 5 augusti, då vi erbjuder en unik Library. There will be three concerts at Solhällan in Löderup. And, konsert vid Ales stenar, på Kåseberga, i soluppgången. get ready for a magical experience on 5 August, when we will Jazzfestivalen arrangeras sedan 2011 av den ideella föreningen present a unique sunrise concert at Ales stenar, near Kåseberga. Ystad Sweden Jazz och Musik i Syd i ett viktigt och förtroendefullt The jazz festival has been arranged since 2011 by the non-profit samarbete.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF FISHING IMPACTS ON HABITAT - SEPTEMBER 2003 UPDATE Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission SEPTEMBER 2003 GSMFC No.: 115 Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat - September 2003 Update Edited by Jeffrey K. Rester Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission September 2003 Introduction This is the third in a series of updates to the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Annotated Bibliography of Fishing Impacts on Habitat originally produced in February 2000. The Commission’s Habitat Subcommittee felt that the gathering of pertinent literature should continue. The third update contains 52 new articles since the publication of the last update. The update uses the same criteria that the original bibliography and first and second updates used to compile articles. It attempts to compile a listing of papers and reports that address the many effects and impacts that fishing can have on habitat and the marine environment. The bibliography is not limited to scientific literature only. It includes technical reports, state and federal agency reports, college theses, conference and meeting proceedings, popular articles, and other forms of nonscientific literature. This was done in an attempt to gather as much information on fishing impacts as possible. Researchers will be able to decide for themselves whether they feel the included information is valuable. Fishing, both recreational and commercial, can have many varying impacts on habitat and the marine environment. Whether a fisher prop scars seagrass, drops an anchor on a coral reef, or drags a trawl across the bottom, each act can alter habitat and affect fish populations.
    [Show full text]
  • ﺑﺴﻢ اﷲ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ اﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ Displacements and Failure Forms Around Mine
    ﺑﺴﻢ اﷲ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ اﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ Displacements and failure forms around mine openings (Ingassana chromite mines, Sudan) By TAG ELDIN ELTAYEB BABIKER A thesis submitted to the University of Khartoum For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) In Mining Engineering Department of Mining Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Architecture University of Khartoum November 2004 ﺒﺴﻡ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺭﺤﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺤﻴﻡ "ﻭﻗﻞ ﺭﺏ ﺫﺩﻧﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ" ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ Acknowledgments I gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance and encouragement of Professor Hamid Ahmed Elhag and Dr Hamid Jasim Elisawi for their invaluable assistance which includes the experimental and theoretical part of this work. I am extremely grateful to Dr. Mohammed Ahmed Osman, the Supervisor whose discussions, guidance, comments, suggestion, encouragement and friendly advice contributed much to the termination of this work. My extreme gratitudes go as well to Dr Hussein Ahmed Elarabi, the co- Supervisor for his sincere and fruitful advice at each step that led to the accomplishment of this work. I would also like to thanks professor C.T.Shaw Department of Mining, Imperial College for his invaluable assistance and suggestion. I acknowledge with profound gratitude the gracious assistance that was offered by the staff of the department and their endless patience which directly contributed towards the presentation of this thesis. Finally thanks are due to the staff of the Faculty for their cooperation and support. Table of Contents Page Acknowledgment ………………………………………. I Abstract ………………………………………………… V Abstract in Arabic………………………………………. VII List of Figures …………………………………………. VIII List of Tables …………………………………………... IX Notations ……………………………………………….. IX Chapter One Introduction 1.1 Background……………………………1 .. 1.2 Objective ……………………………… .. 3 1.2.1 Parameters…………………………… .
    [Show full text]
  • COASTAL EROSION and BEACH NOURISHMENT in SCANIA AS ISSUES in SWEDISH COASTAL POLICY Skånes Kusterosion Och Strandfodringars Roll I Svensk Kustpolicy
    VATTEN – Journal of Water Management and Research 72:103–115. Lund 2016 COASTAL EROSION AND BEACH NOURISHMENT IN SCANIA AS ISSUES IN SWEDISH COASTAL POLICY Skånes kusterosion och strandfodringars roll i svensk kustpolicy by LOTTE E. BONTJE 1, CAROLINE FREDRIKSSON 2, ZILIN WANG 3, JILL H. SLINGER 1, 4 1 Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Multi-Actor Systems department. P. O. Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands. 2 Lund University, Faculty of Engineering (LTH), Department of Building and Environmental Technology, Division of Water Resources Engineering. Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. 3 Tianjin Academy of Environmental Sciences, No. 17 Fukang Road, Tianjin 300191, China. 4 Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Coastal Engineering. P. O. Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands. Abstract This paper discusses the dynamics of coastal policy change in Sweden, using erosion and beach nourishments as an example. The Multiple Stream Model is a theoretical model on agenda setting and policy change devel- oped by the political scientist John Kingdon (1984, 2003). This paper applies Kingdon’s model in describing and explaining coastal policy dynamics regarding coastal erosion in Sweden. Coastal protection is not a separate policy field in Sweden: interventions to protect the (common) coast form a component of spatial planning, which is largely the responsibility of the municipalities. Our analysis reveals that interventions to protect the coast are indeed organized at a local level, by landowners and the municipality, driven by a strong problem perception. This problem perception is articulated as a local voice seeking increased acknowledgement of the coastal erosion issue by the national government.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Inspection 2004
    A SUMMARY OF REPORT 266 2005 Educational inspection 2004 Summary of inspection results Order address: Fritzes kundservice SE-106 47 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 690 95 76 Fax: +46 8 690 95 50 E-mail: [email protected] www.skolverket.se Published by Skolverket Registration number: 06:933 ISBN: 91-85009-97-0 Graphic production and illustrations: AB Typoform Printed by: Stockholm 2006 Educational inspection 2004 Summary of inspection results Index Foreword 5 1. Summary 7 1.1. The purpose, basis and structure of the report 8 1.2. The National Agency for Education’s inspection function 11 The scope of the educational inspection 11 The purpose of the educational inspection 11 The educational inspection model and implementation 12 1.3. Inspected municipalities 2003 and 2004 14 1.4. Trends and tendencies 16 Results in compulsory schools and upper secondary schools 16 Student participation in compulsory schools and upper secondary schools 18 Steering, management and quality work in compulsory schools and upper secondary schools 21 Fees in compulsory schools and upper secondary schools 22 Results in adult education 22 Student participation in adult education 22 Steering, management and quality work in adult education 23 Pre-school activities and childcare for school children 23 Education for students with learning disabilities 23 Independent schools 25 1.5. Reflections on the results of the inspection 27 Background 27 Overall picture 28 Teaching 30 Variation in conditions, processes and results 36 Appendix 1. Inspection reports from the National Agency for Education regarding inspections carried out in 2004 42 Appendix 2. Sources (in addition to inspection reports from the National Agency for Education regarding inspections carried out in 2004) 45 Foreword In the appropriation directions for 2003, the Government commissioned the National Agency for Education to carry out educational inspections covering every municipality and all schools every six years.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Our Beaches 2 CONTENTS
    Welcome to our beaches 2 CONTENTS Welcome to our beaches ................................................................................................................. 4 Park legally and show consideration ......................................................................... 7 Offshore currents at bathing sites ................................................................................... 8 OUR BEACHES Skepparp .................................................................................................................................................................10 Vitemölla .................................................................................................................................................................11 Stenshuvud ..........................................................................................................................................................12 Rörum/Knäbäckshusen ...............................................................................................................13 Baskemölla ..........................................................................................................................................................14 Tobisvik ......................................................................................................................................................................15 Kyls strandbad/Borrby strand ..........................................................................................16 Mälarhusen .........................................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Engagement Plan – Sweden
    Stakeholder Engagement Plan – Sweden Nord Stream 2 AG | Jan-19 W-HS-EMS-PSE-PAR-800-SEPSWEEN-05 Page 2 of 37 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4 1 Brief Description of the Project ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Nord Stream 2 Project in Sweden .......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Ancillary Components and Activities ............................................................................................. 8 1.4 Project Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 9 2 Applicable Stakeholder Engagement Requirements ....................................................................... 9 2.1 Swedish Regulatory Requirements for Community Engagement ................................................. 9 2.2 Requirements of International Conventions ................................................................................10 2.3 Performance Standards of International Financial Institutions ....................................................10 2.4 Internal Policies and Standards ...................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • White Coral Community
    or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The approval portionthe ofwith any articlepermitted only photocopy by is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution This article has This been published in HERMES SPECIAL ISSUE FEATURE O ceanography , Volume 22, Number 1, a quarterly journal of The 22, Number 1, a quarterly , Volume The O WhITE CORAL ceanography S ociety. ociety. © COMMUNITY The 2009 by in the Central Mediterranean Sea O Revealed by ROV Surveys ceanography O ceanography ceanography S ociety. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. article use for research. and this copy in teaching to granted rights All reserved. is ociety. Permission S ociety. ociety. S end all correspondence to: [email protected] or Th e [email protected] to: correspondence all end BY ANDRÉ FREIWALD, LYDIA BEUCK, ANDRES RÜGGEBERG, MARCO TavIanI, DIERK HEbbELN, O anD R/V METEOR CRUISE M70-1 PARTICIpantS ceanography S ociety, P ociety, O Box 1931, R epublication, systemmatic reproduction, reproduction, systemmatic epublication, R ockville, M D 20849-1931, US A. 58 Oceanography Vol.22, No.1 ABSTRACT. White coral communities consist of scleractinian corals that thrive completed by further ROV dives into the in the ocean’s bathyal depths (~ 200–4000 m). In the Atlantic Ocean, white corals are better-known Apulian deep-water reefs off Santa Maria di Leuca (Tursi et al., known to form complex, three-dimensional structures on the seabed that attract vast 2004; Taviani et al., 2005a).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2019
    2019 Enriching and simplifying life through Friendly Homes HEIMSTADEN BOSTAD ANNUAL REPORT WITH SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Contents OUR BUSINESS 1 Our journey of growth 2 A comment from our CEO • 5 Significant events in 2019 6 Our vision and the path ahead 8 Values we generate 10 Our strategy 12 Our business model 13 Our core values 14 Heimstaden as an investment 15 Earning capacity • 16 Importance of partnerships 18 OUR MARKET 20 Heimstaden’s market 26 Regulated and unregulated market 28 Geographic distribution 32 Sweden 34 Denmark Administration Report and Financial information Heimstaden Bostad’s Annual Report is published in Swedish and English. The Swedish version is the original and has 36 Norway been audited by Heimstaden’s auditor. The annual accounts for the 2019 financial year 38 Germany and the Administration Report are presented on pages 5, 16 –17, 44 – 54, 74– 85 and 96–137 of this document. The Audit Report is also presented on pages 138–140. 40 Netherlands Other external review The Auditor has reviewed the Corporate Governance Report on pages 86–93, in accordance with FAR’s auditing standard RevU 16 The auditor’s 42 HOW WE WORK examination of the corporate governance statement. The Auditor has reviewed the • 44 Analysis and transaction Sustainability Report on pages 144–159, in accordance with FAR’s recommendation RevR 12 Auditor’s opinion regarding the statutory Sustainability Report. • 46 Project and property development Report inspired by GRI Standards Heimstaden Bostad’s Sustainability Report has • 50 Property management been inspired by the GRI guidelines and selected areas of sustainability have been reported in accordance with the GRI Standards’ appli- SUSTAINABILITY cation level Core.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. II (2015) Vol
    ISSN 2391-9450 (print) ISSN 2450-4114 (online) Hereditas Minariorum Vol. II (2015) Minariorum Vol. Hereditas ISSN 2391-9450 (print) ISSN 2450-4114 (online) Vol. II (2015) SPIS TREŚCI / CONTENTS Od redakcji / Editorial . 5 ARTYKUŁY / ARTICLES Dariusz Rozmus RB NQBNM – Przełożo ny gór ników z II tysiąc lecia p.n.e. 9 RB NQBNM – Miners’ supervisor from the 2nd millennium BC Andrzej J. Wójcik, Wojciech Preidl Kopalnia węgla blanowickiego„Zygmunt” w Porębie koło Zawiercia . 27 “Zygmunt” – blanowice coal mine in Poręba near Zawiercie Agnieszka Gontaszewska Zarys historii gór nictwa węg la brunatnego w okolicy Ośn a Lubuskiego i Sulęcin a (Ziemia Lubuska) . 51 Outline of the history of lignite mining in area of Ośno Lubuskie and Sulęcin (West Poland) Marek J. Battek Christoph Traugott Delius – twór ca nowoczesnego gór nictwa w Europie Śr odkowej . 67 Christoph Traugott Delius – creator of modern mining in Middle Europa SPOJRZENIE W PRZESZŁOŚĆ. HISTORYCZNE GÓRNICTWO W ŚWIECIE LOOK INTO THE PAST – HISTORIC MINING AROUND THE WORLD Najstarsza kopalnia soli . 80 The oldest salt mine KOMUNIKATY NAUKOWE / SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATIONS Krzysztof Maciejak, Marcin Maciejak Kopalnia Schwarze Minna . 85 Schwarze Minna Wiesław Ko tarba Kopalnia rudy że laznej „Prz emsza” w nadaniu gór niczym „Prz emsza 2” w Krzykawie . 99 Iron ore mine “P rzemsza” of a mining charter “P rzemsza 2” in Krzykawa Paweł P. Zagożdżon Galerías del agua (sztolnie wodne) na Wyspach Kanaryjskich . 111 Galerías del agua (water adits) in Canary Islands Paweł P. Zagożdżon Małe sztolnie na polach gór niczych kopalń Longyearbyen (Spitsbergen) – raport ze zwiadu terenowego w latach 2012 i 2015 . 123 Small adits in mining fields of Longyearbyen (Spitsbergen) – a report from reconnaisance in the years 2012 and 2015 Stefan Gierlotka Lokomotywy pneumatyczne w przewozie kopalnianym .
    [Show full text]
  • MB0117: Understanding the Distribution and Trends in Inshore Fishing Activities and the Link to Coastal Communities
    Cefas contract report C5401 MB0117: Understanding the distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Authors: Koen Vanstaen and Patricia Breen Issue date: 02/12/2014 Cefas Document Control Title: Understanding the distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Submitted to: Carole Kelly, Defra Date submitted: 02/12/2014 Project Manager: Koen Vanstaen Report compiled by: Koen Vanstaen and Patricia Breen Quality control by: Janette Lee Approved by & date: Edmund McManus, 01/12/2014 Version: Final Draft Version Control History Author Date Comment Version KV & PB 26/03/2014 Draft 0.1 JL 28/03/2014 Internal review KV & PB 29/03/2014 Final Draft 1.0 KV 01/12/2014 Final 2.0 Distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Page i Project Title: Understanding the distribution and trends in inshore fishing activities and the link to coastal communities Project Code: MB0117 Defra Contract Manager: Leila Fonseca/Carole Kelly, Defra, Marine and Fisheries Science Unit Funded by: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) Marine and Fisheries Science Unit Marine Directorate Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Authorship: Koen Vanstaen and Patricia Breen Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Pakefield Road Lowestoft Suffolk NR33 0HT United Kingdom tel: + 44 (0)1502 562244 email: [email protected] www.cefas.co.uk Disclaimer: The content of this report does not necessarily reflect the views of Defra, nor is Defra liable for the accuracy of information provided, or responsible for any use of the reports content.
    [Show full text]
  • GFCM Workshop on IUU Fishing in the Mediterranean Sea
    GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN COMMISSION GÉNÉRALE DES PÊCHES POUR LA MÉDITERRANÉE GFCM Workshop on IUU Fishing in the Mediterranean Sea Tunis, Tunisia, 3-4 October 2013 OPENING AND ARRANGEMENTS OF THE MEETING 1. The “GFCM Workshop on IUU Fishing in the Mediterranean Sea” was held on 3-4 October 2013 in Tunis, Tunisia. The Workshop was attended by 42 experts from GFCM Members, relevant organizations and entities. The list of Participants is provided in Appendix B of this report. 2. Mr Bayram Ozturk, Moderator of the Workshop, called the meeting to order and reminded participants that a workshop germane to the subject matter had been already convened for the Black Sea (Istanbul, Turkey, February 2013). As in the case of the Black Sea, the moderator advocated zero tolerance for IUU fishing in the Mediterranean Sea and called upon all actors involved to cooperate in coming to grips with this scourge. 3. Mr Hachemi Missaoui, from the Tunisian Directorate General of Fisheries and Aquaculture, welcomed participants and expressed his deep concern for the critical situation of Mediterranean stocks. He declared that IUU fishing was directly related to the problem of how best to ensure sustainably managed stocks and that concerted action had to be taken. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA AND INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND MEETING’S OBJECTIVES 4. After the participants had introduced themselves, the GFCM Secretariat recalled that the main objective of the meeting was to identify relevant elements for a roadmap to fight IUU fishing in the Mediterranean Sea. The agenda of the Workshop was subsequently introduced and adopted without amendments (Appendix A).
    [Show full text]