Stakeholder Engagement Plan – Sweden
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Stakeholder Engagement Plan – Sweden Nord Stream 2 AG | Jan-19 W-HS-EMS-PSE-PAR-800-SEPSWEEN-05 Page 2 of 37 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4 1 Brief Description of the Project ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 The Nord Stream 2 Project in Sweden .......................................................................................... 6 1.3 Ancillary Components and Activities ............................................................................................. 8 1.4 Project Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 9 2 Applicable Stakeholder Engagement Requirements ....................................................................... 9 2.1 Swedish Regulatory Requirements for Community Engagement ................................................. 9 2.2 Requirements of International Conventions ................................................................................10 2.3 Performance Standards of International Financial Institutions ....................................................10 2.4 Internal Policies and Standards ...................................................................................................11 3 Summary of Key Socio-Economic and Environmental Aspects ..................................................11 3.1 Community Health, Safety and Security .....................................................................................11 3.2 Biodiversity ..................................................................................................................................12 3.3 Marine Infrastructure and Military Activities ................................................................................12 3.4 Ecosystem Services ....................................................................................................................12 3.5 Cultural Heritage..........................................................................................................................13 3.6 Munitions Clearance (Potential for Underwater Noise) ...............................................................13 3.7 Environmental Monitoring Stations..............................................................................................13 3.8 Transboundary Aspects ..............................................................................................................13 4 Identification of Stakeholders ..........................................................................................................13 4.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................13 4.2 Affected Stakeholders .................................................................................................................15 4.3 Interested Stakeholders ..............................................................................................................16 5 Stakeholder Engagement Activities Undertaken to Date ..............................................................18 5.1 EIA / Permitting phase .................................................................................................................19 5.2 Construction phase .....................................................................................................................21 5.3 Issues Raised ..............................................................................................................................21 6 Planned Stakeholder Engagement Activities .................................................................................23 6.1 Possible Means of Engagement ..................................................................................................23 6.2 Information Disclosure Plan ........................................................................................................24 6.3 Stakeholder Engagement Activities.............................................................................................26 7 Stakeholder Engagement Data Management .................................................................................29 7.1 Means of Receiving Feedbacks ..................................................................................................29 7.2 Grievance Mechanism .................................................................................................................30 8 Resources and Implementation .......................................................................................................32 9 Monitoring and Reporting ................................................................................................................33 Annex 1 ......................................................................................................................................................34 Stakeholder Engagement Plan - Sweden W-HS-EMS-PSE-PAR-800-SEPSWEEN-05 2019-01-25 Page 3 of 37 Abbreviations and Definitions Affected Local communities directly affected by the Project communities CAB County Administrative Board Contractor Any legal entity or physical person providing services to the Company Cumulative effect Combined impact of several sources spread in space or combined impact of one source spread in time. DP Dynamically Positioned EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone Ecosystem The benefits obtained by humans from functioning of natural systems services EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Study Espoo Convention Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context, 1991 Espoo Report Report on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context GoU Gotland University IFC International Finance Corporation KaK Kammarkollegiet NGO Non-governmental organizations NSP Nord Stream AG NSP2 Nord Stream 2 project Project Nord Stream 2 pipeline construction project PS Performance Standards PID Project Information Document ROW Right-of-way SBA Swedish Board of Agriculture SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan SGU Geological Survey of Sweden SMA Swedish Maritime Administration STA Swedish Transport Agency Stakeholders Any individual or group who is affected by the project implementation or may have a relevant interest in, or influence over, it SwAM Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management TrV Swedish Transport Administration TW Territorial Waters UXO Unexploded Ordnance Stakeholder Engagement Plan - Sweden W-HS-EMS-PSE-PAR-800-SEPSWEEN-05 2019-01-25 Page 4 of 37 Executive Summary Background to the Nord Stream 2 Project The Nord Stream 2 Project (the “Project”) comprises the planning, construction and operation of a new strategic twin subsea pipeline (the “Pipeline”) that will connect European consumers with Russian gas fields. The Project will have the capacity to supply 55 billion m3 (bcm) of natural gas per year. The Pipeline has a planned length of approximately 1,230 km from Russia to Germany via the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and/or Territorial Waters of Russia, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Germany (the “Project Countries”) in the Baltic Sea. The design, construction and subsequent operation of the pipeline are managed by Nord Stream 2 AG (the “Company”), which has been specifically established for this purpose. Nord Stream 2 AG recognizes the importance of stakeholder engagement in building strong, constructive, and responsive relationships that are essential for the successful management of the Project's environmental and social impacts. The objective of the Company’s stakeholder engagement process is to disclose information about the Project while also giving stakeholders the opportunity to provide their opinions and identify any concerns. The opinions/concerns submitted during the consultation process have been taken into account in the preparation and review of the Project’s environmental and social management plans, and during the development of the design of the Project. Nord Stream 2’s Approach to Stakeholder Engagement The Company is implementing a stakeholder engagement process across the entire Nord Stream 2 Project, managed through a suite of country-specific SEPs applicable to each Project Country. The SEPs have been developed in a consistent manner in line with the requirements of the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards (PS), while at the same time ensuring that country-specific regulatory requirements are met. The stakeholder engagement process commenced at the early stages of the Project development and will continue in an evolving manner throughout the entire Project lifecycle. To reflect this evolving process, the SEPs are “living” documents that will be updated as necessary throughout the Project’s lifecycle. The current version of the SEP was updated at the beginning of 2019 to include the start of the ongoing construction phase in Sweden. While the IFC PS requirements for environmental and social assessment and management are broadly aligned with the national EIA requirements in the five Project Countries, some differences exist requiring the development of additional assessments and plans (for example, in relation