DOCSLIB.ORG

Democracy Revision Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Democracy Revision Table DEMOCRACY REVISION UNIVERSAL ADULT EXAMPLES OF HOW FAR DID IT HOW LIMITED HISTORIOGRAPHY/QUOTES SUFFRACE WHAT WAS INTRODUCE EXAMPLES INTRODUCED DEMOCRACY The 2nd Parliamentary Reform 1) 400,000 extra voters 1) size of electorate doubles 1) vote still depended on D.G Wright argues ‘’democracy was Act 1867 allowing household suffrage from 1,120,000 to 2.5 million property undemocratic because of the number of (extension of the franchise) in the boroughs. 2) 1 in 3 males could now 2) 2 in 3 men were without males disenfranchised, as well as 2) Electorate extended to vote the vote as well as all women women’’ skilled working class who 3) Act led to improvements in had stayed in property for at political parties. least a year and lodgers paying a minimum of £10 rent a year. Plural voting still existed and 1884 3rd Parliamentary Reform Gave men in the country the 1) The electorate increased made up 7 % of the T.C Smout: “The 1884-85 Act failed to Act. The Representation of the same voting rights as in the from 2.5 million to 5 million. electorate. Live in servants. achieve or indeed never intended to People Act towns. In England and Wales 2) Franchise qualification in Sons living at home and achieve the granting of manhood (extension of the franchise) 2 in 3 men could now vote. counties the same as paupers still weren’t allowed suffrage in town and county. The act left Franchise extended to boroughs. to vote (12% of the some 40% of adult males in the UK householders who paid rates population.) without the vote. and stayed there for at least a Women were still not year. allowed to vote. Representation of the People Gave all women over 30 who Gave some women the vote The right to vote was based Act 1918 were householders or the for the first time and on housing qualification. (extension of the franchise) wife’s of householders and extended the vote to all adult Women not granted the vote university graduates. The males. on equal terms as men. occupiers of property with £5 annual rent the vote Representation of the People All women over 21 who Extended the franchise to all Act 1918 stayed in a constituency for women over the age of 21 over 6 months were granted and gave women the same the vote. voting rights as men EQUAL REP The Second Parliamentary Counties and boroughs Parties had to develop MPs were still unevenly Reform Act 1867 with less than10,000 national organisations as distributed. Did not alter (Redistribution of seats) people lost 1 MP boroughs increased the balance of political The remaining 45 seats voters. power. Electorate still redistributed to counties largely remained the and boroughs that had same more people since 1832, eg Liverpool got 1 more MP The Redistribution Act Constituencies were Moved Britain closer to Thomson argues that the 1885 reorganised into more a democracy 1884/1885 act emphasised public equal sizes by Put in place an electoral opinion and ensured more focus population. 79 towns system which is similar was put on it. with a population under to the present system 15,000 lost both their seats. Attempted to make each MP represent roughly the same number of people. Secret Ballot Act 1872 Secret Ballot, voting An improvement Employers were still The chief commissioner of police now done in secret, towards democracy and bribing their workers to in London reported – “Since the Everyone who were able helped in ending vote passing of the Ballot Act we have to vote could be free patronage Between 1867 and never had the slightest trouble at from intimidation 1885. Four town were any election that has taken place disenfranchised due to in London and the places that corrupt practices used to be the worst are now the best 1883 Corrupt and Illegal Involvement in less intimidation plural voting still “Elections certainly became more Practices Act corruption could lead to new code of ethics had existed orderly” S. Wood: Britain 1850 - a heavy fine or moved forward towards some people voted for 1979, p36 imprisonment democracy. the same person as they agents had to account for donated to local the money they spent charities and churches dictated what campaign the money was to be spent on DEMO/PRINCIPLES 1911 Parliament Act House of Lords could no Lords no longer had power to Not fully democratic as the longer prevent the Budget completely stop a Bill. Life of House of Lords still had Bills and could only delay the Government term reduced power powers despite not bills for 2 years. MP’s given a from 7 years to 5. being elected. salary of £400 a year Allowed working class people to become MP’s by giving them a salary. MP’s could not bribe their constituents so they had to listen to their wishes to get voted in. Now the elected members (Commons) have more power than the unelected (Lords) FORMATION OF The Liberal and LABOUR PARTY 1906 Conservative Party’s had another political rival. The working class now had a party to politically represent them. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download PDF on Financial Privilege
    Report Financial Privilege The Undoubted and Sole Right of the Commons? Sir Malcolm Jack KCB PhD FSA Richard Reid PhD FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE THE UNDOUBTED AND SOLE RIGHT OF THE COMMONS? By Sir Malcolm Jack KCB PhD FSA and Richard Reid PhD Acknowlegements The authors thank The Constitution Society for commissioning and publishing this paper. First published in Great Britain in 2016 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-0-9954703-0-9 © Malcolm Jack and Richard Reid 2016. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE 3 Contents Acknowlegements 2 About the Authors 4 Summary 5 PART 1 Conventions in Respect of Financial Privilege 6 PART 2 Parliament Acts 19 PART 3 Handling of Bills with Financial Provisions 30 PART 4 Secondary Legislation 41 PART 5 The Strathclyde Review 51 Appendix 1 Parliament Act 1911 62 Appendix 2 Parliament Act 1949 67 4 FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE About the Authors Sir Malcolm Jack was Clerk of the House of Commons from 2006–2011. He is editor of the current, twenty-fourth edition of Erskine May’s Parliamentary Practice, 2011. He lectures and writes on constitutional and historical subjects, having published widely on the history of ideas as well as on aspects of British, European and South African history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impossible Office? Anthony Seldon , Assisted by Jonathan Meakin , Illias Thoms Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-51532-7 — The Impossible Office? Anthony Seldon , Assisted by Jonathan Meakin , Illias Thoms Index More Information Index 10 Downing Street, 6, 17, 45, 112, 127, 149, Alfred the Great, 26 166, 173, 189–90, 330–1, 338 Aliens Act (1905), 51 ‘Garden Suburb’, 118 Allen, Douglas, 300 14 Downing Street, 255 Althorp, John Charles Spencer, Lord 1922 Committee, 194 Althorp, 108, 285 1958 US–UK Defence Agreement, 35 American Civil War (1861–5), 107, 209, 263 2011 UK Census, 50 American colonies, 71, 72, 74, 75 7/7 terrorist attack, 44 American War of Independence (1775–83), 70 Whitehall, 166, 190 40, 76, 83, 210, 212, 227, 230, 251, 9/11 terrorist attack, 44, 211 254, 256 Amherst, Jeffrey, 253 Abdication crisis (1936), 121, 203, 240 Amiens, Treaty of (1802), 90, 96 Aberdeen, George Hamilton-Gordon, Lord Anderson, John, 295 Aberdeen, 30, 102, 104, 105, 106, 110, Andreotti, Giulio, 140 113, 173, 181, 212, 234, 262, 287, Andrew, Duke of York, 17 316, 319 Anglican Church. See Church of England Act of Settlement (1701), 12, 223, 251 Anglo French Naval Convention (1911), Act of Union (1707), 10, 12, 26, 38, 66, 265 156, 223 Anglo–Japanese Alliance (1902), 264 Act of Union (1800), 39, 89 Anne, Queen, 12, 14, 22, 64, 65, 93, 223, 251 Adams, John, 168, 227 Archbishop of Canterbury, 25 Adams, W. G. S., 118 Argyll, John Campbell, Duke of Argyll, Addington, Henry, 49, 90, 96, 268, 318, 337 23, 82 Adelaide, Queen, 231, 232 aristocracy, 48 Adenauer, Konrad, 140 Armstrong, William, 143, 144, 171, Admiralty, 26, 117, 155, 250,
    [Show full text]
  • The Electric Telegraph
    To Mark, Karen and Paul CONTENTS page ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENTS TO 1837 13 Early experiments—Francis Ronalds—Cooke and Wheatstone—successful experiment on the London & Birmingham Railway 2 `THE CORDS THAT HUNG TAWELL' 29 Use on the Great Western and Blackwall railways—the Tawell murder—incorporation of the Electric Tele- graph Company—end of the pioneering stage 3 DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE COMPANIES 46 Early difficulties—rivalry between the Electric and the Magnetic—the telegraph in London—the overhouse system—private telegraphs and the press 4 AN ANALYSIS OF THE TELEGRAPH INDUSTRY TO 1868 73 The inland network—sources of capital—the railway interest—analysis of shareholdings—instruments- working expenses—employment of women—risks of submarine telegraphy—investment rating 5 ACHIEVEMENT IN SUBMARINE TELEGRAPHY I o The first cross-Channel links—the Atlantic cable— links with India—submarine cable maintenance com- panies 6 THE CASE FOR PUBLIC ENTERPRISE 119 Background to the nationalisation debate—public attitudes—the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce— Frank Ives. Scudamore reports—comparison with continental telegraph systems 7 NATIONALISATION 1868 138 Background to the Telegraph Bill 1868—tactics of the 7 8 CONTENTS Page companies—attitudes of the press—the political situa- tion—the Select Committee of 1868—agreement with the companies 8 THE TELEGRAPH ACTS 154 Terms granted to the telegraph and railway companies under the 1868 Act—implications of the 1869 telegraph monopoly 9 THE POST OFFICE TELEGRAPH 176 The period 87o-1914—reorganisation of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Basis of Vicarious Liability
    Laski, harola Joseph The basis of vicarious liabil. Kl) 1999 I 38 1916 ( . 1 NOBA Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from 1 IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/basisofvicariousOOIaskuoft I^irvt^, rrf. UJ-X4J^ / The Basis of Vicarious Liability HAROLD J. LASKI {Reprinted from the Yale Law Journal^ December, 1916) THE BASIS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY I If a master choose to give orders to his servant, no one can fail to understand why he should be held liable for the conse- quences of their commission.^ Nor is the case in substance dif- ferent when he ratifies his servant's act. To stamp what is done for him with the seal of his approval is tacitly, but obviously, to accept the act as his own f and that is true no less where the ratification is implicit, than where it is expressly made manifest.^ No one, moreover, deems it necessary to take objection to lia- bility which is consequent upon a general negligence.* I may knowingly employ a clearly incompetent person.^ I may con- sciously fail to provide proper means for the performance of the allotted work.^ I may fail to give my servant information which I know to be essential to the right completion of his task.'' 1 may fail to take adequate precautions against the commission of a tort in my presence.^ In cases such as these, where the master is directly involved, it is essential to any scheme of law that he should be held liable for such damage as his servant may cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗
    Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗ VERY PRELIMINARY W. Walker Hanlon Northwestern University, NBER, CEPR July 27, 2021 Abstract This article provides a new measure of the agenda of the British Parliament{the sub- stantive topics on which debate was focused{from 1810-1914. This measure is obtained by applying a keyword approach to debate descriptions from the Hansard records. The results provide a new tool for analyzing the evolution of the British political system across this important period of history. To illustrate the utility of this measure, I an- alyze two issues. First, I use the data to identify key turning points, years that saw the most dramatic changes in the issues being debated. This analysis identifies three points, the First Reform Act (1832), the repeal of the Corn Laws (1846), and the rise of the Labour Party (1910), as critical periods of change. In contrast, little seems to have changed in the years around the Second Reform Act (1867) or Third Reform Act (1884). The data are also used to study the impact of changes in party control on the agenda of Parliament. I find little evidence that shifts in the identity of the party in government substantially influenced the issues that came before Parliament. This finding suggests that parties played a reactive rather than a proactive role in determining what issues Parliament needed to address at any given point in time. ∗I thank Alexandra E. Cirone and seminar participants at the Northwestern Economic History Brownbag for helpful comments. Author email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Basis of Vicarious Liability
    THE BASIS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY I If a master choose to give orders to his servant, no one can fail to understand why he should be held liable for the conse- quences of their commission.' Nor is the case in substance dif- ferent when he ratifies his servant's act. To stamp what is done for him with the seal of his approval is tacitly, but obviously, to accept the act as his own ;2 and that is true no less where the ratification is implicit, than where it is expressly made manifest.3 No one, however, deems it necessary to take objection to lia- bility which is consequent upon a general negligence.4 I may knowingly employ a clearly incompetent person.' I may con- sciously fail to provide proper means for the performance of the allotted work. I may fail to give my servant information which I know to be essential to the right completion of his task.7 I may fail to take adequate precautions against the commission of a tort in my presence.8 In cases such as these, where the master is directly involved, it is essential to any scheme of law that he should be held liable for such damage as his servant may cause. The problem is far different where express authority does not exist. A state in which it is an accepted doctrine that the sins of the servant may, even when unauthorized, be visited upon the master, has won a tolerable respect for its law. Yet the thing is sufficiently novel to be worth some careful investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • This Essay Explains Benjamin Disraeli Parliamentary Response to The
    Conservatism and British imperialism in India: finding the local roots of empire in Britain and India by Matthew Stubbings A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Matthew Stubbings 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public ii Abstract This thesis explores the importance of political conservatism in shaping the ideological and political foundations of British imperialism in India between 1857 and 1914. From the Indian Revolt to the rise of Indian nationalism, it examines how British and Indian conservatives attempted to define a conceptual and institutional framework of empire which politically opposed liberal imperialism to the First World War. It relies upon a biographical analysis to examine how intellectual configurations defined distinct political positions on Indian empire. This study reveals the extent that local conservative inclination and action, through political actors such as Lord Ellenborough, Benjamin Disraeli, Lord Mayo, Lord Lytton, the Kathiawar States, Roper Lethbridge, and M.M. Bhownaggree, shaped public and partisan discourse on empire. It argues that British and Indian conservatives evoked shared principles centered in locality, prescription, and imagination to challenge, mollify, and supplant the universal and centralizing ambitions of liberal imperialists and nationalists with the employment of pre-modern ideas and institutions. It is argued that this response to liberalism conditioned their shared contribution and collaboration towards an imperial framework predicated principally upon respecting and supporting local autonomy and traditional authority in a hierarchical and divided India.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Questions Practise
    Practice Questions Practise Democratic Reform Women’s Suffrage & In what year did the Reform Act take place? € Why were womennotallowed to vote? [1] [1] Whatwasa rotten borough? 6 What law waspassed in 1870? [1] [1] How manypeople were allowedto votein the early 1860s? Whatyear did Marion Wallace Dunlop begin her hungerstrike in prison? [1] [1] WhatAct did the government pass in 1872? 0 Which type of women were given the vote in 1918? [1] [1] In your opinion, whydid the voting system need reforming by 1832? In your opinion, how important wasthe role of the Pankhursts in the suffrage campaign? In your answer youshould: In your answer you should: ° Give at least three examples of unfairness in the voting system. e Describe the actions of the Suffragette Movement. e Use facts to support your answer. e Take into account other factors involved in the suffrage campaign. e Use facts to support your answer. Write your answerona separate sheetof paper. [10] Write your answer on a separate sheet of paper. [10] Explain whether the Chartist movement should be viewed as a failure. 6 Explain why the struggle for equality failed in the 19th century. In your answer you should: ° Explain at least three different negative outcomes for the Chartist movement. In your answer you should: e Use facts to support your answer. e Give your opinion on at least three different reasons. e Use facts to support your answer. Write your answer ona separate sheet of paper. [10] Write your answer on a separate sheet of paper. [10] KS3 History Revision Guide ) Review Questions State Democratic4 Reform Women’sI, Suffrage Ge Which three cities had no MPsin the 1820s? € In what year did the women’s movementsstart to differ over the methods used? [1] [1] : & How many miners and ironworkers took part in the Newport Rising? é How many womenwent to Downing Street to protest in 1906? [1] [1] .
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Politics
    A Beginner’s Guide to the Politics of the UK Introduction This is an attempt to produce an unbiased beginner’s guide to the politics of the United Kingdom. An education in the UK today does little to inform or educate you about politics today, and then you are expected to go out there and make an informed choice on how to vote. This guide is aimed to be an aide to those who are wondering how they should vote or starting to take part in debate. It is not a technical or academic guide and will not meet the requirement of anyone studying Politics at A Level or university, although it may be a good starting point for those new to the subject. I have not studied politics in an academic setting myself. However, I have encountered it in my studies of history, philosophy and current affairs, inspiring me to look further. Through my participation in debate and my extra research, I have gleaned a good working knowledge of modern politics in Britain. Here I set out that which I have learned, in the hope that you should find it helpful. In this guide, I discuss the following: Political Systems The Origins of Democracy Development of Democracy in the UK The Democratic Ideal, Constitutions and the Separation of Powers The UK Constitution Parliamentary Democracy in the UK The Political Spectrum in the UK Political Parties in the UK The Current Political Climate in the UK It is certainly possible to skip sections, but I recommend reading it all in order at least once.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of LORDS Annual Report and Resource Accounts 2017-18
    Annual Report and Resource Accounts 2017-18 For the year ended 31 March 2018 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 175 Ordered to be printed 17 July 2018 HOUSE of LORDS Annual Report and Resource Accounts 2017-18 Contents Foreword Foreword by the Clerk of the Parliaments 3 Performance report Strategic aim and objectives 2016-21 4 Organisational structure 6 Implementation of business plan by strategic objective 9 Accountability Report Management commentary 15 Statement of Accounting Officer’s Responsibilities 20 Governance Statement 21 Audit Committee Annual report 31 Climate change, sustainability and the environment 35 Diversity and corporate responsibility report 39 Remuneration and Staff Report Remuneration report 41 Remuneration policy 41 Pay multiples 41 Management Board salary and pensions 42 Staff report 46 Staff costs 46 Staff composition 47 Compensation schemes – exit packages 47 Consultancy costs 49 Sickness absence 49 Staff policies 49 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit Statement of Parliamentary Supply 50 Notes to the Statement of Parliamentary Supply 51 Parliamentary Accountability Disclosures 52 The Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General 53 Financial Statements Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure 56 Statement of Financial Position 57 Statement of Cash Flows 58 Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity 59 Notes to the Accounts 60 Appendices Appendix A: Composition of the House of Lords 2017-18 83 Appendix B: Activity data 2017-18 84 2 HOUSE of LORDS Annual Report and Resource Accounts 2017-18 Foreword by the Clerk of the Parliaments This is the second House of Lords Annual Report to be combined with our Resource Accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • Janice Carlisle, “On the Second Reform Act, 1867”
    Janice Carlisle, On the Second Reform Act,... http://www.branchcollective.org/?ps_articles=janice-carlisle-on-the-second-reform-act-1867 Janice Carlisle, “On the Second Reform Act, 1867” Introduction The Second Reform Act (1867) raised in its own time and continues to raise in ours two deceptively simple questions, one of cause and the other of effect. How did a bill for which there was so little enthusiasm become law? To what extent did its passage grant Britain a genuinely representative government? For many contemporary observers, the act was, for better or worse, an obviously liberalizing measure because it typically enfranchised a majority of working-class men living in the boroughs and cities of England and Wales. Thomas Carlyle, writing in his diatribe Shooting Niagara: And After? (1867), had no doubts that the Great Unwashed, as working men were often called, would soon be catastrophically ascendant: the country was about to take the “Niagara leap of democracy,” after which the nation would be ruled by a “Swarmery” of men “buzzing, humming . tumbling in infinite noise and darkness”; all political questions would be determined by a simple “Count of Heads” (4, 10, 1). The poet Coventry Patmore wrote in similar tones of despair, “the orgies of the multitude/ . now begin” (ll. 62-63). The number of potential new electors explains, at least in part, such hysteria. The Second Reform Act – more formally, An Act Further to Amend the Laws Relating to the Representation of the People in England and Wales (30 & 31 Vict., c. 102) – no doubt extended the work of the First Reform Act of 1832.
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue of Democracy Through Parliamentary Reforms in The
    People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research Echahid Hamma Lakhdar University, Eloued Faculty of Arts and Languages Department of Arts and English Language The Issue of Democracy through Parliamentary Reforms in the Victorian UK Dissertation submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Master Degree in Literature and Civilization Submitted By : Supervisor : Mohammed Yacine YOUMBAI Karima DJEROU Afaf KEBACHE Board of Examiners President: Mr. Ammar SAOUD University, Eloued Supervisor: Mr . Mohammed Yacine YOUMBAI University, Eloued Examiner: Mr. Mohammed Abidi CHOUCHANI University, Eloued Academic Year: 2018/ 2019 Dedication To our families who love us with no conditions To our beloved underground who we wish they were with us on this special day To our teachers who give us comments for our own benefits To our friends who were with us in good and bad To you our dear reader who we wish you find this work beneficial I Acknowledgements First of all, we praise Almighty Allah without whom we would have never gone through this worthy experience which is the completion of our humble achievement; the completion of our Master dissertation. On this occasion, we owe thanks, gratitude and appreciation to our supervisor Mr. YOUMBAI Mohammed Yacine for his knowledge, guidance, and assistance. We extend our deep gratitude to the Department of English in El-Oued University and every contributor for giving us the honor of being one of the pioneers who accomplished their Master degree in Literature and Civilization of English Language studies in El-Oued University. Moreover, we would like to express our thanks and appreciation to the honorable members of the jury for devoting their precious time and great efforts to evaluate our work which without whom it would have not to be refined as it is not preserved from imperfections.
    [Show full text]