D E P a Rtm E N T O F D Ista N C E Ed U C a Tio N Pu N Ja B I U N Ive Rsity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

D E P a Rtm E N T O F D Ista N C E Ed U C a Tio N Pu N Ja B I U N Ive Rsity Department of Distance Education Punjabi University, Patiala (All Copyrights are Reserved) UNIT NO :- 2 M.A. (HISTORY) PART-I (SEMESTER-II) LESSON NO. : Note Note : 2.10 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 : department's website www.dccpbi.com Students can download the syllabus from the : : : : : : : : : England Act of 1832 Growth of Parliamentary System in Eastern Question (1832-1870) Eastern Question (1800-1832) The Unification of Germany, 1848-1871 The Unification of Germany, 1789-1848 The Unification of Italy, 1848-1870 The Unification of Italy, 1789-1848 Labour Movements in Europe Europe Rise and EnglandGrowth Act of 1867 ofGrowth Socialismof Parliamentaryin System in SECTION : B HISTORY HISTORY OF THE WORLD (1815-1870) PAPER-II M.A. (HISTORY) PART-I PAPER-II HISTORY OF THE WORLD (1815-1870) LESSON NO. 2.1 AUTHOR : DR. S.K. BAJAJ GROWTH OF PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM IN ENGLAND- ACT OF 1832 Background The English Parliament is one of the unique representative institutions that appeared in Europe during the later Middle Ages. Its humble beginning can be traced to the Magna Carta of 1215, but it was in the reign of Edward I (1272-1307) that the expedient calling elected representatives of the countries and towns or brought to the King's Council or Parliament, was adopted The purpose of calling such representatives was to obtain their assent to the levying of taxes to meet the expenses of wars. In due course of time these representatives began to sit separately from the Peers ; this assembly thus, came to be known as the 'House of Commons'. But the close of the sixteenth century, the role of the Parliament in the making of statute law had become fully established, and the gentry had grown ambitious and sought election to Parliament. The Tudors and Stuarts created many new Parliamentary bouroughsnot on the basis of wealth of population but simply as convenient means of strengthening the parliamentary support of the Crown. Over two hundred such seats were created by them, while the Act of Union with Scotland added 45% more and Irish Union another hundred, bringing the total to 658. Despite the grave crisis during the Stuart period, the attempts to reform anomalies and make the Parliament more representative could not succeed. The revolution of 1688, however, was a momentous landmark in the history of the British Parliament and prestige of the Parliament. But the settlement that followed froze the pattren of parliamentary representation. With the exception of the Septennial Act of 1716, which fixed the tenure of Parliament as seven years, there was no material change in the framework of Parliament (except the addition of Scottish members after the Act of Union, with Scotland, 1707) and of the Irish members, under the Act of Union with Ireland of 1800 until the passing Reform Bill of 1832. This long period of quiescence represented not only a reaction to the traumatic experience of the seventeenth century revolution, but also marked the triumphant ascendancy of the landed classes who found the un-reformed Parliament an ideal means of prepetuating their role. Causes Impact of Agrarian and Industrial Revolution : Agrarian and Industrial 1 M.A. (History) Part-I 2 Paper-II revolution brought about profound social and economic changes. Mass of rural population converted into a landless proletariat owing to enclosure system migrated to new industrial towns, where urban population rose enormously ; for example, the population of Liverpool rose from 82,000 to nearly 400,000 and of Briston from 61,000 to 137,000. North gained most by displacements of population, linked together by improved means of communication, railways macadamised roads and steam ships. These changes helped England to grow into the workshop of the world. The aforesaid social and economic changes and political effects of great importance. The predominant influence in the affairs of the nation began to be slowly placed from landed to industrial and financial class Their rivalry had grown quite sharp during the second half of the nineteenth century, although landed interest remained predominant throughout this period. "Since Parliament was the essential instrument of political power, control of which was necessary to any interest desirous of serving its own purposes, the early nineteenth century witnesses a violent conflict between the landed class which wishes to attain its monopoly and its industrial rivals who intended to capture that instrument for their end", remarks David Lindsay Keir (p. 168). Their conflict brought to the fore necessity of parliamentary reform. An important effect of industrial revolution was the change in the economic institution. Decline of mercantile system and emergence of the laissezfaire principle was one of the significant feature of the age. Again, change in the herited organisation of industry also led to subjecting to political institutions as parliament, the administrative system and law and justice to test and re-examination. It was keenly felt by the social philosophers of the age that representation to Parliament should be modified in such a way that it should reflect interests Preponderant in the nation. Atmosphere of Reform : The Change in the temper of the nation posed a challenge for the Tory Party. Representing landed interest during the reign of George III and George IV, it was opposed to remodelling of the Parliamentary system. Yet this period embraced long 'sequence of reforms - financial, administrative and judicial. Most radical among them were Test and Corporation Acts and Act for Roman Catholoic emancipation. The Whigs, supported by the radical group professing the doctrines of Benthan, i.e., Utilitarians, who believed that maintenance of existing institutions, depended primarily on their success in serving "the greatest good of the greater number." The pursuit of individual interest led not to harmony but to anarchy. The problems of poverty, disease, ignorance and insanitary conditions awoke the government to new social realities and persuaded them to impose external regulation and restrain the individual. Under such circumstances, reform in the Parliament became imperative. Although personal authority of the Crown was declining after the collapse of M.A. (History) Part-I 3 Paper-II American Colonies the King supported by the Lords kept firm on his prerogative. Decline of the royal control had taken place primarily for two reasons - incapability and insanity of George III and the development of cabinet system. For half a century before 1832 the administration was ceasing to be the personal concern of the sovereign. Cabinet began to free itself from the sovereign's control. The functions of the government were increasing rapidly. Monopoly enjoyed by the Anglican got undermined with the entry and local governments of England of control. These profound changes touching every branch of administration were bound to affect the chief institution of the country, the Parliament. Extension of representation and remarking of constituencies were measures consistent with democratic principles which were expected to end the ascendancy of the landed class and introduce that of industrial capitalist. Growing Demand for Parliamentary Reform : The reform of 1782 concentrated on removing the abuse of influence and refrained from remodelling the electoral franchise or distribution of seats. The main defect of the electoral system was considered to be the immense preponderance in the Commons of members representing rotton borough. In the old structure it was never conceived that the purpose of the electoral system was to elicit the views of a numerical majority of the nation. It was intended to voice the opinions of those 'interests' which dominated the country. Such as landed interest, "So long, in fact, as England continued to be as it has been, a stable and mainly agricultural society, its unreformed House of Commons was no adequate embodiment of its principles, interests and prejudices", remarks Keir. The first attempt was made in 1762 to check bribery at elections by imposing a fine on offenders. In 1770, under the Grenvile Act committees were appointed to investigate into the abuses. The inquiries showed how deep-rooted were the evils and how difficult it was to eradicate them by penal statutes. The remedy must be radical. The first amongst people to rise cry for reform were from (Middle sex) and Yorkshire. A comprehensive parliamentary motion for extension of franchise, redistribution of seats, the first of its kind, was made in 1776 by a Radical member from (Middle sex) John Wilkes, whose proposal envisaged giving additional members to London and to more populous countries, disfranchsing rotton boroughs and providing for separate representation of such large towns as Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Birmingham. The cause was taken up no less a person than the Pitt the Younger, two introduced motions when out of office in 1782 and 1783 and again while Prime Minister in 1785, but with no success. His programme of electoral reforms was quite radical as it envisaged to extinguish by purchase the right of fifty boroughs to return members, to redistribute the hundred seats thus made available, and to enlarge the electorate by admitting copyholder to the franchise. He did not succeed in getting his measures passed as the King was hostile to the bill, the cabinet divided M.A. (History) Part-I 4 Paper-II and the Commons unfriendly. The French Revolution initially gave a stimulus to the forces of reform, but a reaction quickly set in as the terror spread in France. Nevertheless, the Whig Party under Charles James Fox's leadership continued to play lip service to the cause of Parliamentary reform. After the Peace Settlement of 1815, a small Radical group nicknamed 'Mountain' moved a serious reforms proposals, but they could not secure support of their own party as some of the old aristocracy treated these motions without much regard.
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF on Financial Privilege
    Report Financial Privilege The Undoubted and Sole Right of the Commons? Sir Malcolm Jack KCB PhD FSA Richard Reid PhD FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE THE UNDOUBTED AND SOLE RIGHT OF THE COMMONS? By Sir Malcolm Jack KCB PhD FSA and Richard Reid PhD Acknowlegements The authors thank The Constitution Society for commissioning and publishing this paper. First published in Great Britain in 2016 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-0-9954703-0-9 © Malcolm Jack and Richard Reid 2016. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE 3 Contents Acknowlegements 2 About the Authors 4 Summary 5 PART 1 Conventions in Respect of Financial Privilege 6 PART 2 Parliament Acts 19 PART 3 Handling of Bills with Financial Provisions 30 PART 4 Secondary Legislation 41 PART 5 The Strathclyde Review 51 Appendix 1 Parliament Act 1911 62 Appendix 2 Parliament Act 1949 67 4 FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE About the Authors Sir Malcolm Jack was Clerk of the House of Commons from 2006–2011. He is editor of the current, twenty-fourth edition of Erskine May’s Parliamentary Practice, 2011. He lectures and writes on constitutional and historical subjects, having published widely on the history of ideas as well as on aspects of British, European and South African history.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan's Parliament in the Making
    Andrea Fleschenberg Afghanistan’s parliament in the making Gendered understandings and practices of politics in a transitional country Afghanistan’s parliament in the making 6cYgZV;aZhX]ZcWZg\!E]9!XjggZcianldg`hVhgZhZVgX]VhhdX^ViZVcYaZXijgZg Vii]Z>chi^ijiZd[HdX^VaHX^ZcXZVii]ZJc^kZgh^ind[=^aYZh]Z^b!<ZgbVcn# EgZk^djhan!h]ZlVhVgZhZVgX][ZaadlVii]Z>chi^ijiZd[:Vhi6h^VcHijY^Zh$Ed" a^i^XVaHX^ZcXZVii]ZJc^kZgh^ind[9j^hWjg\":hhZcVcYVaZXijgZgVii]ZJc^kZg" h^ind[8dad\cZ!<ZgbVcn#>c'%%,h]ZlVhVk^h^i^c\egd[ZhhdgVii]ZJc^kZgh^in d[i]ZEjc_VW^cAV]dgZ!EV`^hiVc!VcY^c'%%+Vii]ZJc^kZgh^iVi?VjbZ>^c 8VhiZaadc!HeV^c#=ZggZhZVgX]VgZVhVgZXdbeVgVi^kZVcYi]^gYldgaYeda^i^Xh l^i]VeVgi^XjaVg[dXjhdcHdji]VcYHdji]ZVhi6h^V!YZbdXgVi^oVi^dcVcY ZaZXi^dchijY^Zh!igVch^i^dcVa_jhi^XZ^hhjZh!\ZcYZgVcYeda^i^Xh!dcl]^X]h]Z ]VhXdcig^WjiZYcjbZgdjhejWa^XVi^dch# I]^hejWa^XVi^dclVhegZeVgZYl^i]hjeedgi[gdbi]ZJc^iZYCVi^dch9ZkZade" bZci;jcY[dgLdbZcJC>;:B"6[\]Vc^hiVc#I]Zk^ZlhVcYVcVanh^hXdc" iV^cZY^ci]ZejWa^XVi^dcVgZi]dhZd[i]ZVji]dgVcYYdcdicZXZhhVg^angZegZ" hZcii]Zk^Zlhd[JC>;:B!i]ZJc^iZYCVi^dchdgVcnd[^ihV[Äa^ViZYdg\Vc^oV" i^dch# 7^Wa^d\gVe]^XYViVd[i]Z<ZgbVcA^WgVgn I]Z<ZgbVcCVi^dcVaA^WgVgn9C7a^hihi]^hejWa^XVi^dc^ci]Z<ZgbVcCV" i^dcVa7^Wa^d\gVe]n#;dgYZiV^aZYW^Wa^d\gVe]^XYViVdca^cZ\did/]iie/$$YcW# YYW#YZ 6[\]Vc^hiVc¼heVga^VbZci^ci]ZbV`^c\ <ZcYZgZYjcYZghiVcY^c\hVcYegVXi^XZhd[eda^i^Xh^cVigVch^i^dcVaXdjcign 7n6cYgZV;aZhX]ZcWZg\ :Y^iZYWni]Z=Z^cg^X]7aa;djcYVi^dc >cXddeZgVi^dcl^i]JC>;:B =Z^cg^X]"7aa"Hi^[ijc\!7Zga^c'%%.0JC>;:B 6aag^\]ihgZhZgkZY :Y^i^c\/GdWZgi;jgadc\ E]didh/<jaWjYY^c:a]Vb 9Zh^\cVcYIneZhZii^c\/\gVe]^XhncY^XVi!B^X]VZaE^X`VgYi!7Zga^c
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability for National Defence
    Ideas IRPP Analysis Debate Study Since 1972 No. 4, March 2010 www.irpp.org Accountability for National Defence Ministerial Responsibility, Military Command and Parliamentary Oversight Philippe Lagassé While the existing regime to provide accountability for national defence works reasonably well, modest reforms that reinforce the convention of ministerial responsibility can improve parliamentary oversight and civilian control of the military. Le processus actuel de reddition de comptes en matière de défense nationale remplit son rôle ; toutefois, des réformes mineures renforçant la responsabilité ministérielle permettraient de consolider la surveillance parlementaire et la direction civile des forces militaires. Contents Summary 1 Résumé 2 Parliament and National Defence 5 The Government and National Defence 28 Notes and References 58 About This Study 61 The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IRPP or its Board of Directors. IRPP Study is a refereed monographic series that is published irregularly throughout the year. Each study is subject to rigorous internal and external peer review for academic soundness and policy relevance. IRPP Study replaces IRPP Choices and IRPP Policy Matters. All IRPP publications are available for download at irpp.org. If you have questions about our publications, please contact [email protected]. If you would like to subscribe to our newsletter, Thinking Ahead, please go to our Web site, at irpp.org. ISSN 1920-9436 (Online) ISSN 1920-9428 (Print) ISBN 978-0-88645-219-3 (Online) ISBN 978-0-88645-221-6 (Print) Summary Canadians’ renewed focus on military matters reflects a desire to strengthen accountability for matters of national defence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impossible Office? Anthony Seldon , Assisted by Jonathan Meakin , Illias Thoms Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-51532-7 — The Impossible Office? Anthony Seldon , Assisted by Jonathan Meakin , Illias Thoms Index More Information Index 10 Downing Street, 6, 17, 45, 112, 127, 149, Alfred the Great, 26 166, 173, 189–90, 330–1, 338 Aliens Act (1905), 51 ‘Garden Suburb’, 118 Allen, Douglas, 300 14 Downing Street, 255 Althorp, John Charles Spencer, Lord 1922 Committee, 194 Althorp, 108, 285 1958 US–UK Defence Agreement, 35 American Civil War (1861–5), 107, 209, 263 2011 UK Census, 50 American colonies, 71, 72, 74, 75 7/7 terrorist attack, 44 American War of Independence (1775–83), 70 Whitehall, 166, 190 40, 76, 83, 210, 212, 227, 230, 251, 9/11 terrorist attack, 44, 211 254, 256 Amherst, Jeffrey, 253 Abdication crisis (1936), 121, 203, 240 Amiens, Treaty of (1802), 90, 96 Aberdeen, George Hamilton-Gordon, Lord Anderson, John, 295 Aberdeen, 30, 102, 104, 105, 106, 110, Andreotti, Giulio, 140 113, 173, 181, 212, 234, 262, 287, Andrew, Duke of York, 17 316, 319 Anglican Church. See Church of England Act of Settlement (1701), 12, 223, 251 Anglo French Naval Convention (1911), Act of Union (1707), 10, 12, 26, 38, 66, 265 156, 223 Anglo–Japanese Alliance (1902), 264 Act of Union (1800), 39, 89 Anne, Queen, 12, 14, 22, 64, 65, 93, 223, 251 Adams, John, 168, 227 Archbishop of Canterbury, 25 Adams, W. G. S., 118 Argyll, John Campbell, Duke of Argyll, Addington, Henry, 49, 90, 96, 268, 318, 337 23, 82 Adelaide, Queen, 231, 232 aristocracy, 48 Adenauer, Konrad, 140 Armstrong, William, 143, 144, 171, Admiralty, 26, 117, 155, 250,
    [Show full text]
  • The Electric Telegraph
    To Mark, Karen and Paul CONTENTS page ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENTS TO 1837 13 Early experiments—Francis Ronalds—Cooke and Wheatstone—successful experiment on the London & Birmingham Railway 2 `THE CORDS THAT HUNG TAWELL' 29 Use on the Great Western and Blackwall railways—the Tawell murder—incorporation of the Electric Tele- graph Company—end of the pioneering stage 3 DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE COMPANIES 46 Early difficulties—rivalry between the Electric and the Magnetic—the telegraph in London—the overhouse system—private telegraphs and the press 4 AN ANALYSIS OF THE TELEGRAPH INDUSTRY TO 1868 73 The inland network—sources of capital—the railway interest—analysis of shareholdings—instruments- working expenses—employment of women—risks of submarine telegraphy—investment rating 5 ACHIEVEMENT IN SUBMARINE TELEGRAPHY I o The first cross-Channel links—the Atlantic cable— links with India—submarine cable maintenance com- panies 6 THE CASE FOR PUBLIC ENTERPRISE 119 Background to the nationalisation debate—public attitudes—the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce— Frank Ives. Scudamore reports—comparison with continental telegraph systems 7 NATIONALISATION 1868 138 Background to the Telegraph Bill 1868—tactics of the 7 8 CONTENTS Page companies—attitudes of the press—the political situa- tion—the Select Committee of 1868—agreement with the companies 8 THE TELEGRAPH ACTS 154 Terms granted to the telegraph and railway companies under the 1868 Act—implications of the 1869 telegraph monopoly 9 THE POST OFFICE TELEGRAPH 176 The period 87o-1914—reorganisation of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Basis of Vicarious Liability
    Laski, harola Joseph The basis of vicarious liabil. Kl) 1999 I 38 1916 ( . 1 NOBA Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from 1 IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/basisofvicariousOOIaskuoft I^irvt^, rrf. UJ-X4J^ / The Basis of Vicarious Liability HAROLD J. LASKI {Reprinted from the Yale Law Journal^ December, 1916) THE BASIS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY I If a master choose to give orders to his servant, no one can fail to understand why he should be held liable for the conse- quences of their commission.^ Nor is the case in substance dif- ferent when he ratifies his servant's act. To stamp what is done for him with the seal of his approval is tacitly, but obviously, to accept the act as his own f and that is true no less where the ratification is implicit, than where it is expressly made manifest.^ No one, moreover, deems it necessary to take objection to lia- bility which is consequent upon a general negligence.* I may knowingly employ a clearly incompetent person.^ I may con- sciously fail to provide proper means for the performance of the allotted work.^ I may fail to give my servant information which I know to be essential to the right completion of his task.'' 1 may fail to take adequate precautions against the commission of a tort in my presence.^ In cases such as these, where the master is directly involved, it is essential to any scheme of law that he should be held liable for such damage as his servant may cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan's Parliament in the Making
    The involvement of women in Afghanistan’s public life is decreasing. Attacks, vigilantism, and legal processes that contradict the basic principles of human and women’s rights are the order of the day. The security situation is worsening in step with the disenchantment E MAKING H arising from the lack of results and functional shortcomings of existing democratic structures. In the face of such difficulties, we often forget who should create the legal underpinnings for the power in Afghanistan: the women and men in parliament who are working to build a state in these turbulent times of transition. To what extent will these elected representatives succeed in creating alternatives to established traditional power structures? What are the obstacles they face? What kinds of networks or caucuses are they establishing? This book, which is based on interviews of male and female members of parliament held in Kabul in 2007 and 2008, examines the reali- IN T pARLIAMENT ANISTan’s H ties of parliamentary work in Afghanistan. It shows how varied and G coercive the patterns of identification prevalent in Afghanistan can AF be, and it provides a rare opportunity to gain insights into the self- images and roles of women in parliament. ISBN 978-3-86928-006-6 Andrea Fleschenberg Afghanistan’s parliament in the making Andrea Fleschenberg Gendered understandings and practices of politics in a transitional country .) ED BÖLL FOUNDATION ( BÖLL FOUNDATION H The Green Political Foundation Schumannstraße 8 10117 Berlin www.boell.de HEINRIC Afghanistan’s parliament in the making Andrea Fleschenberg, PhD, currently works as research associate and lecturer at the Institute of Social Science at the University of Hildesheim, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebalancing the British Constitution the Future for Human Rights Law
    Rebalancing the British Constitution The future for human rights law Jim McConalogue Rebalancing the British Constitution Rebalancing the British Constitution The future for human rights law Jim McConalogue First published March 2020 © Civitas 2020 55 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL email: [email protected] All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-912581-04-7 Independence: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society is a registered educational charity (No. 1085494) and a company limited by guarantee (No. 04023541). Civitas is financed from a variety of private sources to avoid over-reliance on any single or small group of donors. All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting the advancement of learning. The views expressed are those of the authors, not of the Institute. Typeset by Typetechnique Printed in Great Britain by 4edge Limited, Essex iv Contents Author vi Summary vii Introduction 1 1. Taking back parliamentary democracy 28 2. Reversing judicial supremacy and the ‘constitutional 38 shocks’ of Strasbourg jurisprudence 3. Rekindling the power of the executive to govern 65 and protect 4. Sovereignty and the restoration of British 88 human rights 5. Reclaiming democracy and deliberation – 107 the foundation for future rights Conclusion 124 Notes 127 v Author Jim McConalogue is the editorial director at the think tank Civitas and author of The British Constitution Resettled: Parliamentary Sovereignty Before and After Brexit (Palgrave Macmillan 2019). vi Summary Practical guidance • The repeal of the Human Rights Act (HRA) is now well overdue, given its detrimental impact on the UK constitution. • The UK must withdraw from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg.
    [Show full text]
  • Theparliamentarian
    TheParliamentarian Journal of the Parliaments of the Commonwealth 2015 | Issue Three XCVI | Price £13 Elections and Voting Reform PLUS Commonwealth Combatting Looking ahead to Millenium Development Electoral Networks by Terrorism in Nigeria CHOGM 2015 in Malta Goals Update: The fight the Commonwealth against TB Secretary-General PAGE 150 PAGE 200 PAGE 204 PAGE 206 The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) Shop CPA business card holders CPA ties CPA souvenirs are available for sale to Members and officials of CPA cufflinks Commonwealth Parliaments and Legislatures by CPA silver-plated contacting the photoframe CPA Secretariat by email: [email protected] or by post: CPA Secretariat, Suite 700, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA, United Kingdom. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE The Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) exists to connect, develop, promote and support Parliamentarians and their staff to identify benchmarks of good governance and implement the enduring values of the Commonwealth. Calendar of Forthcoming Events Confirmed at 24 August 2015 2015 September 2-5 September CPA and State University of New York (SUNY) Workshop for Constituency Development Funds – London, UK 9-12 September Asia Regional Association of Public Accounts Committees (ARAPAC) Annual Meeting - Kathmandu, Nepal 14-16 September Annual Forum of the CTO/ICTs and The Parliamentarian - Nairobi, Kenya 28 Sept to 3 October West Africa Association of Public Accounts Committees (WAAPAC) Annual Meeting and Community of Clerks Training - Lomé, Togo 30 Sept to 5 October CPA International
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗
    Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗ VERY PRELIMINARY W. Walker Hanlon Northwestern University, NBER, CEPR July 27, 2021 Abstract This article provides a new measure of the agenda of the British Parliament{the sub- stantive topics on which debate was focused{from 1810-1914. This measure is obtained by applying a keyword approach to debate descriptions from the Hansard records. The results provide a new tool for analyzing the evolution of the British political system across this important period of history. To illustrate the utility of this measure, I an- alyze two issues. First, I use the data to identify key turning points, years that saw the most dramatic changes in the issues being debated. This analysis identifies three points, the First Reform Act (1832), the repeal of the Corn Laws (1846), and the rise of the Labour Party (1910), as critical periods of change. In contrast, little seems to have changed in the years around the Second Reform Act (1867) or Third Reform Act (1884). The data are also used to study the impact of changes in party control on the agenda of Parliament. I find little evidence that shifts in the identity of the party in government substantially influenced the issues that came before Parliament. This finding suggests that parties played a reactive rather than a proactive role in determining what issues Parliament needed to address at any given point in time. ∗I thank Alexandra E. Cirone and seminar participants at the Northwestern Economic History Brownbag for helpful comments. Author email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Basis of Vicarious Liability
    THE BASIS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY I If a master choose to give orders to his servant, no one can fail to understand why he should be held liable for the conse- quences of their commission.' Nor is the case in substance dif- ferent when he ratifies his servant's act. To stamp what is done for him with the seal of his approval is tacitly, but obviously, to accept the act as his own ;2 and that is true no less where the ratification is implicit, than where it is expressly made manifest.3 No one, however, deems it necessary to take objection to lia- bility which is consequent upon a general negligence.4 I may knowingly employ a clearly incompetent person.' I may con- sciously fail to provide proper means for the performance of the allotted work. I may fail to give my servant information which I know to be essential to the right completion of his task.7 I may fail to take adequate precautions against the commission of a tort in my presence.8 In cases such as these, where the master is directly involved, it is essential to any scheme of law that he should be held liable for such damage as his servant may cause. The problem is far different where express authority does not exist. A state in which it is an accepted doctrine that the sins of the servant may, even when unauthorized, be visited upon the master, has won a tolerable respect for its law. Yet the thing is sufficiently novel to be worth some careful investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • This Essay Explains Benjamin Disraeli Parliamentary Response to The
    Conservatism and British imperialism in India: finding the local roots of empire in Britain and India by Matthew Stubbings A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Matthew Stubbings 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public ii Abstract This thesis explores the importance of political conservatism in shaping the ideological and political foundations of British imperialism in India between 1857 and 1914. From the Indian Revolt to the rise of Indian nationalism, it examines how British and Indian conservatives attempted to define a conceptual and institutional framework of empire which politically opposed liberal imperialism to the First World War. It relies upon a biographical analysis to examine how intellectual configurations defined distinct political positions on Indian empire. This study reveals the extent that local conservative inclination and action, through political actors such as Lord Ellenborough, Benjamin Disraeli, Lord Mayo, Lord Lytton, the Kathiawar States, Roper Lethbridge, and M.M. Bhownaggree, shaped public and partisan discourse on empire. It argues that British and Indian conservatives evoked shared principles centered in locality, prescription, and imagination to challenge, mollify, and supplant the universal and centralizing ambitions of liberal imperialists and nationalists with the employment of pre-modern ideas and institutions. It is argued that this response to liberalism conditioned their shared contribution and collaboration towards an imperial framework predicated principally upon respecting and supporting local autonomy and traditional authority in a hierarchical and divided India.
    [Show full text]