DOCSLIB.ORG

Kohn Debating Difference in an Age of Reform

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Debating Difference in an Age of Reform: Liberal Praxis and Representation in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain by Jenny Deborah Kohn A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Lucy Hartley, Chair Professor Geoff Eley Professor Daniel HacK Professor Kerry Larson Professor Adela Pinch Jenny Deborah Kohn [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2819-2070 © Jenny Deborah Kohn 2018 Acknowledgements This dissertation is a tangible representation of collective action. Thanks are due to the following people, without whom I would never have been able to complete this project. First and foremost, I thank my dissertation committee. Danny HacK generously supported my completion during a difficult semester. It is also thanks to him that the novel plays the role it does in this dissertation. Adela Pinch has been a mentor since I taught for her; I cannot now imagine any other introduction to the Michigan classroom than learning regency dance with one’s students. Anticipating Kerry Larson’s questions has inspired no small degree of terror throughout my graduate career; it has also made me a better, more rigorous scholar. Geoff Eley kindly agreed to use precious leave time to sit on my committee, and in so doing pushed me to genuinely interdisciplinary ways of thinking and questioning. Above all, I thank Lucy Hartley, Whose intellectual rigor and curiosity, careful thought and analysis, and generosity of time and spirit represent everything worthwhile about the academic endeavor, and whose mentorship has shaped my growth as a scholar and a teacher since my first semester at Michigan. Lucy, I could not have completed the dissertation without you, nor would I have wanted to. I am lucky to have had mentors beyond the committee. Thanks to Marjorie Levinson, for spirited conversation and modeling the kinds of intellectual commitments I aspire to make, and to Christina Lupton, for helping me shape my driving questions When I first began to conceive of this project. For material support, thanks to Hannah Westall at the Girton College Archives for assisting my research on the Langham Place Group, and to Alice Denton for hosting me in ii Cambridge (and for many years of friendship). To members and staff of GEO, past and present, for being the best example of collective action, and to Lisa Curtis and Denise Looker, for being an integral part of our work as teachers. I am deeply grateful for community in and beyond Ann Arbor. Thanks to my cohort in the English doctoral program, for improving my work, and life, throughout the years. To Dean Disher, Liz Roberts, and Neda Ulaby for the title of the dissertation. To Meredith Perry, Scout, Penny, and Bravo for taking me in during the final crucial semester, and Ames Healy for alWays being a home to come back to. To Cat Cassel for being an ideal reader and note taker, not to mention a true friend. To the netball ladies for becoming my family over the years, especially Laura Adams (my favourite attacker), Isabel English, Louise Jeffery, Ruth Hamilton, Elspeth Martini, Denise Quinn, and Sarah White. To the late Dalia Warner: you are missed. To Jude, Susan, and Sym Kohn for their constant support. And finally, to my family, Ghazaleh Koohestanian and Vita, for being everything. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iv Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... v Introduction The Meaning of Difference in Nineteenth-Century Liberal Thought ............... 1 The rationale ............................................................................................................................... 4 The methodology ...................................................................................................................... 19 The plan .................................................................................................................................... 23 Chapter One The Idea of Difference in Mill’s Conception of Liberal Equality ................... 26 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 26 Labor, empire, and naturalizing difference ............................................................................... 32 The feeling of difference: Individualism and the limits of autonomy ...................................... 49 Love and empiricism: Private feelings of a mass public .......................................................... 66 Chapter Two A “Woman’s Squabble” or Ideal Public Sphere? The Women of Langham Place ........................................................................................................................................... 107 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 107 Of members and mobilization ................................................................................................. 113 The place of women in public ................................................................................................. 123 The English Women’s Journal in the literary public sphere ................................................... 129 Incorporated aesthetics ............................................................................................................ 143 Democratic letters ................................................................................................................... 149 Incorporated form of the LPG ................................................................................................. 171 Chapter Three Aesthetic Liberalism: Election Novels of the 1860s ..................................... 197 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 197 Felix Holt, The Radical ........................................................................................................... 207 Miss Marjoribanks .................................................................................................................. 229 Phineas Finn ........................................................................................................................... 249 The politics of the novel ......................................................................................................... 261 Afterword .................................................................................................................................. 282 Presentism and Difference: Victorian Studies Now ............................................................... 285 Bibliography .............................................................................................................................. 292 iv List of Figures Figure 1: [Barbara Bodichon?]. “Ye neWe generation” (c. 1854). .............................................. 144 Figure 2: Vote Like a Black Woman .......................................................................................... 282 iv Abstract “Debating Difference in an Age of Reform: Liberal Praxis and Representation in mid- Nineteenth-Century Britain” explores the function of difference and the nature of equality in the Victorian period. Focusing on the 1850s and 1860s, the dissertation offers a distinctive account of liberal thought, organizing, and aesthetics at a key moment of historical transformation in British society. It identifies how the expansion of the citizenry and the public sphere of readers revealed the fact of difference and why difference challenged democratic ideals of equality. The central question is this: how did liberal thinkers, organizers, and writers navigate the contradiction betWeen equality’s unrealized promise and the actually-existing hierarchy of differences in which they lived? Scholarship on Victorian liberalism often prioritizes liberal over liberal action. This dissertation seeks to redress the imbalance by focusing on the strategies and forms of representation that evolved in order to accommodate neW sets of people as political actors. The first chapter sets the parameters of liberal thought by presenting an analysis of the way J. S. Mill’s conception of difference informed his political practice. I argue that in his political speeches, “The Negro Question” (1850), On Liberty (1859), and The Subjection of Women (1869) Mill’s empirical uncertainty about the cause of difference – Whether it was natural or socially constructed – underpins the liberal equality that he worked to bring about throughout his political career. The second chapter turns to an account of the way that difference structured the organizing work of the feminist collective known as the Langham Place group. My analysis of v the group’s letters and articles from their mouthpiece, the English Woman’s Journal (1858- 1864), shows how the group represented an attempt to expand the democratic public sphere through the production of difference as the basis for forging collective bonds. The third
Recommended publications
  • Download PDF on Financial Privilege

    Download PDF on Financial Privilege

    Report Financial Privilege The Undoubted and Sole Right of the Commons? Sir Malcolm Jack KCB PhD FSA Richard Reid PhD FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE THE UNDOUBTED AND SOLE RIGHT OF THE COMMONS? By Sir Malcolm Jack KCB PhD FSA and Richard Reid PhD Acknowlegements The authors thank The Constitution Society for commissioning and publishing this paper. First published in Great Britain in 2016 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-0-9954703-0-9 © Malcolm Jack and Richard Reid 2016. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE 3 Contents Acknowlegements 2 About the Authors 4 Summary 5 PART 1 Conventions in Respect of Financial Privilege 6 PART 2 Parliament Acts 19 PART 3 Handling of Bills with Financial Provisions 30 PART 4 Secondary Legislation 41 PART 5 The Strathclyde Review 51 Appendix 1 Parliament Act 1911 62 Appendix 2 Parliament Act 1949 67 4 FINANCIAL PRIVILEGE About the Authors Sir Malcolm Jack was Clerk of the House of Commons from 2006–2011. He is editor of the current, twenty-fourth edition of Erskine May’s Parliamentary Practice, 2011. He lectures and writes on constitutional and historical subjects, having published widely on the history of ideas as well as on aspects of British, European and South African history.

  • The Impossible Office? Anthony Seldon , Assisted by Jonathan Meakin , Illias Thoms Index More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-51532-7 — The Impossible Office? Anthony Seldon , Assisted by Jonathan Meakin , Illias Thoms Index More Information Index 10 Downing Street, 6, 17, 45, 112, 127, 149, Alfred the Great, 26 166, 173, 189–90, 330–1, 338 Aliens Act (1905), 51 ‘Garden Suburb’, 118 Allen, Douglas, 300 14 Downing Street, 255 Althorp, John Charles Spencer, Lord 1922 Committee, 194 Althorp, 108, 285 1958 US–UK Defence Agreement, 35 American Civil War (1861–5), 107, 209, 263 2011 UK Census, 50 American colonies, 71, 72, 74, 75 7/7 terrorist attack, 44 American War of Independence (1775–83), 70 Whitehall, 166, 190 40, 76, 83, 210, 212, 227, 230, 251, 9/11 terrorist attack, 44, 211 254, 256 Amherst, Jeffrey, 253 Abdication crisis (1936), 121, 203, 240 Amiens, Treaty of (1802), 90, 96 Aberdeen, George Hamilton-Gordon, Lord Anderson, John, 295 Aberdeen, 30, 102, 104, 105, 106, 110, Andreotti, Giulio, 140 113, 173, 181, 212, 234, 262, 287, Andrew, Duke of York, 17 316, 319 Anglican Church. See Church of England Act of Settlement (1701), 12, 223, 251 Anglo French Naval Convention (1911), Act of Union (1707), 10, 12, 26, 38, 66, 265 156, 223 Anglo–Japanese Alliance (1902), 264 Act of Union (1800), 39, 89 Anne, Queen, 12, 14, 22, 64, 65, 93, 223, 251 Adams, John, 168, 227 Archbishop of Canterbury, 25 Adams, W. G. S., 118 Argyll, John Campbell, Duke of Argyll, Addington, Henry, 49, 90, 96, 268, 318, 337 23, 82 Adelaide, Queen, 231, 232 aristocracy, 48 Adenauer, Konrad, 140 Armstrong, William, 143, 144, 171, Admiralty, 26, 117, 155, 250,
  • The Voices of NPR

    The Voices of NPR

    Episode 11 – Michael Goldfarb – All Along the Watchtower The Voices of NPR And now a personal word, Michael Goldfarb has the voice of a journalist who has witnessed important events. He speaks with weariness and authority. His voice evokes a chorus of NPR announcers who report from near and distant places. Writer Dierdre Mask noted in an article in the Atlantic magazine, “We can’t see NPR reporters, so we have to picture them. And because they are with us in our most private moments—alone in the car, half-asleep in bed—we start to think we know them.” And we do think we know them. Their voices are iconic: distinct, informative, comforting, familiar. Their voices are the sounds of our better selves when we are bright and learned and engaged in the affairs of the world. No matter the day’s events, they give us hope that in a crazy world, sense and sensibility will prevail. Here are a few names I grew up with: Susan Stamberg, Bob Edwards, Carl Kasell, Noah Adams, Linda Wertheimer, Robert Siegel, Scott Simon, Cokie Roberts, and Bob Mondello. Each name evokes a voice, a style, a beat, that is the news soundtrack of our lives and shared imagination. We hear their stories as they report from bureaus from foreign capitals: Eleanor Beardsley, Paris; Rob Gifford, London; Ofiebea Quist-Arcton, Dakar; and, of course, Sylvia Poggioli, Rome. We hear war correspondents in the thick of battle: Michael Golfarb in Northern Ireland and Bosnia; Kelly McEvers in the midst of death and kidnapping in the Arab Spring, Tom Bowman among the fire and mortars of Helmand Province, and David Gilkey ambushed and killed by the Taliban.
  • The Electric Telegraph

    The Electric Telegraph

    To Mark, Karen and Paul CONTENTS page ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENTS TO 1837 13 Early experiments—Francis Ronalds—Cooke and Wheatstone—successful experiment on the London & Birmingham Railway 2 `THE CORDS THAT HUNG TAWELL' 29 Use on the Great Western and Blackwall railways—the Tawell murder—incorporation of the Electric Tele- graph Company—end of the pioneering stage 3 DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE COMPANIES 46 Early difficulties—rivalry between the Electric and the Magnetic—the telegraph in London—the overhouse system—private telegraphs and the press 4 AN ANALYSIS OF THE TELEGRAPH INDUSTRY TO 1868 73 The inland network—sources of capital—the railway interest—analysis of shareholdings—instruments- working expenses—employment of women—risks of submarine telegraphy—investment rating 5 ACHIEVEMENT IN SUBMARINE TELEGRAPHY I o The first cross-Channel links—the Atlantic cable— links with India—submarine cable maintenance com- panies 6 THE CASE FOR PUBLIC ENTERPRISE 119 Background to the nationalisation debate—public attitudes—the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce— Frank Ives. Scudamore reports—comparison with continental telegraph systems 7 NATIONALISATION 1868 138 Background to the Telegraph Bill 1868—tactics of the 7 8 CONTENTS Page companies—attitudes of the press—the political situa- tion—the Select Committee of 1868—agreement with the companies 8 THE TELEGRAPH ACTS 154 Terms granted to the telegraph and railway companies under the 1868 Act—implications of the 1869 telegraph monopoly 9 THE POST OFFICE TELEGRAPH 176 The period 87o-1914—reorganisation of the
  • The Basis of Vicarious Liability

    The Basis of Vicarious Liability

    Laski, harola Joseph The basis of vicarious liabil. Kl) 1999 I 38 1916 ( . 1 NOBA Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from 1 IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/basisofvicariousOOIaskuoft I^irvt^, rrf. UJ-X4J^ / The Basis of Vicarious Liability HAROLD J. LASKI {Reprinted from the Yale Law Journal^ December, 1916) THE BASIS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY I If a master choose to give orders to his servant, no one can fail to understand why he should be held liable for the conse- quences of their commission.^ Nor is the case in substance dif- ferent when he ratifies his servant's act. To stamp what is done for him with the seal of his approval is tacitly, but obviously, to accept the act as his own f and that is true no less where the ratification is implicit, than where it is expressly made manifest.^ No one, moreover, deems it necessary to take objection to lia- bility which is consequent upon a general negligence.* I may knowingly employ a clearly incompetent person.^ I may con- sciously fail to provide proper means for the performance of the allotted work.^ I may fail to give my servant information which I know to be essential to the right completion of his task.'' 1 may fail to take adequate precautions against the commission of a tort in my presence.^ In cases such as these, where the master is directly involved, it is essential to any scheme of law that he should be held liable for such damage as his servant may cause.
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/27/2018 5:46:47 PM OMB NO

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/27/2018 5:46:47 PM OMB NO

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/27/2018 5:46:47 PM OMB NO. 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 u.$. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, pc 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending 06/30/2018 (Insert dole) I-REGISTRANT I. (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. The Fratelli Group 5867 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant 1300 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 950 Washington, DC 20036 2. Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residence address(es) Yes □ No□ (2) Citizenship Yes □ No□ (3) Occupation Yes □ No□ (b) If an organization: (1) Name Yes □ No0 (2) Ownership or control Yes □ No H (3) Branch offices Yes □ NoH (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. N/A ' IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3,4, AND 5(a). 3. If you have previously, fi led Exhibit C1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6 month reporting period. Yes □' No 0 Ifyes, have you filed an amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes □ No □ If no, please attach the required amendment. I Tfie*Exhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy of the charter, articles of incorporation, association; and by taws of a registrant that is an............ organization. (A waiver of the requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon written application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
  • Giuseppe Mazzini's International Political Thought

    Giuseppe Mazzini's International Political Thought

    Copyrighted Material INTRODUCTION Giuseppe Mazzini’s International Political Thought Giuseppe Mazzini (1805–72) is today largely remembered as the chief inspirer and leading political agitator of the Italian Risorgimento. Yet Mazzini was not merely an Italian patriot, and his influence reached far beyond his native country and his century. In his time, he ranked among the leading European intellectual figures, competing for public atten­ tion with Mikhail Bakunin and Karl Marx, John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville. According to his friend Alexander Herzen, the Russian political activist and writer, Mazzini was the “shining star” of the dem­ ocratic revolutions of 1848. In those days Mazzini’s reputation soared so high that even the revolution’s ensuing defeat left most of his Euro­ pean followers with a virtually unshakeable belief in the eventual tri­ umph of their cause.1 Mazzini was an original, if not very systematic, political thinker. He put forward principled arguments in support of various progressive causes, from universal suffrage and social justice to women’s enfran­ chisement. Perhaps most fundamentally, he argued for a reshaping of the European political order on the basis of two seminal principles: de­ mocracy and national self­determination. These claims were extremely radical in his time, when most of continental Europe was still under the rule of hereditary kingships and multinational empires such as the Habs­ burgs and the ottomans. Mazzini worked primarily on people’s minds and opinions, in the belief that radical political change first requires cultural and ideological transformations on which to take root. He was one of the first political agitators and public intellectuals in the contemporary sense of the term: not a solitary thinker or soldier but rather a political leader who sought popular support and participa­ tion.
  • Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗

    Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗

    Analyzing the Agenda of Parliament in the Age of Reform∗ VERY PRELIMINARY W. Walker Hanlon Northwestern University, NBER, CEPR July 27, 2021 Abstract This article provides a new measure of the agenda of the British Parliament{the sub- stantive topics on which debate was focused{from 1810-1914. This measure is obtained by applying a keyword approach to debate descriptions from the Hansard records. The results provide a new tool for analyzing the evolution of the British political system across this important period of history. To illustrate the utility of this measure, I an- alyze two issues. First, I use the data to identify key turning points, years that saw the most dramatic changes in the issues being debated. This analysis identifies three points, the First Reform Act (1832), the repeal of the Corn Laws (1846), and the rise of the Labour Party (1910), as critical periods of change. In contrast, little seems to have changed in the years around the Second Reform Act (1867) or Third Reform Act (1884). The data are also used to study the impact of changes in party control on the agenda of Parliament. I find little evidence that shifts in the identity of the party in government substantially influenced the issues that came before Parliament. This finding suggests that parties played a reactive rather than a proactive role in determining what issues Parliament needed to address at any given point in time. ∗I thank Alexandra E. Cirone and seminar participants at the Northwestern Economic History Brownbag for helpful comments. Author email: [email protected].
  • The Basis of Vicarious Liability

    The Basis of Vicarious Liability

    THE BASIS OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY I If a master choose to give orders to his servant, no one can fail to understand why he should be held liable for the conse- quences of their commission.' Nor is the case in substance dif- ferent when he ratifies his servant's act. To stamp what is done for him with the seal of his approval is tacitly, but obviously, to accept the act as his own ;2 and that is true no less where the ratification is implicit, than where it is expressly made manifest.3 No one, however, deems it necessary to take objection to lia- bility which is consequent upon a general negligence.4 I may knowingly employ a clearly incompetent person.' I may con- sciously fail to provide proper means for the performance of the allotted work. I may fail to give my servant information which I know to be essential to the right completion of his task.7 I may fail to take adequate precautions against the commission of a tort in my presence.8 In cases such as these, where the master is directly involved, it is essential to any scheme of law that he should be held liable for such damage as his servant may cause. The problem is far different where express authority does not exist. A state in which it is an accepted doctrine that the sins of the servant may, even when unauthorized, be visited upon the master, has won a tolerable respect for its law. Yet the thing is sufficiently novel to be worth some careful investigation.
  • Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century

    Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century A Catalogue D. W. Bebbington Professor of History, University of Stirling The catalogue that follows contains biographical data on the Unitarians who sat in the House of Commons during the nineteenth century. The main list, which includes ninety-seven MPs, is the body of evidence on which the paper on „Unitarian Members of Parliament in the Nineteenth Century‟ is based. The paper discusses the difficulty of identifying who should be treated as a Unitarian, the criterion chosen being that the individual appears to have been a practising adherent of the denomination at the time of his service in parliament. A supplementary list of supposed Unitarian MPs, which follows the main list, includes those who have sometimes been identified as Unitarians but who by this criterion were not and some who may have been affiliated to the denomination but who were probably not. The borderline is less sharp than might be wished, and, when further research has been done, a few in each list may need to be transferred to the other. Each entry contains information in roughly the same order. After the name appear the dates of birth and death and the period as an MP. Then a paragraph contains general biographical details drawn from the sources indicated at the end of the entry. A further paragraph discusses religious affiliation and activities. Unattributed quotations with dates are from Dod’s Parliamentary Companion, as presented in Who’s Who of British Members of Parliament.
  • The London Gazette, November 20, 1868. 5997

    The London Gazette, November 20, 1868. 5997

    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 20, 1868. 5997 Borough of Preston. Borough of Newcastk-under-Lyme. Edward Hermon, of Winchley-square, in the said Edmund Buckley, Esq. borough, Esq. William Shepherd Allen, Esq. Sir Thomas George . Jenner Hesketh, of Rufford Ci^y'of London. Hall, in Rufford, Lancashire, Bart. The Right Honourable George Joachim Goschen, Borough of Boston. ( Robert Wigram Crawford, John Wingfield Malcolm, of Great Stanhope- William. Lawrence, street, London, Esq. Charles Bell, Esqrs. Thomas Collins the younger, of Knaresbbrough, in the West Riding of York, Esq. City^qf Exeter. John Duke Coleridge, Esq., Q.C. Borough of Cambridge. Edgar Alfred Bowring, Esq., C.B. Robert Richard Torrens, William Fowler, Es>qrs. Borough of Bodmin. The Honourable Edward Frederick Leveson Borough'of Leicester. Gower, of Chiswick House, Middlesex, Esq. Peter Alfred Taylor, of Aubrey House, Netting Bupghs ofFortrose, Inverness, Nairn, and Forres. Hill, Middlesex,'Esq. John Dove Harris, of Katcliffe Hall, in the county Eneas William Mackintosh, of Raigmore, in the of Leicester, Esq. county of Inverness, Esq. Borough of Rochdale. Borough of Wednesbury. Thomas Bayley Potter, of Buile Hill, Pendleton, Alexander Brogden, Esq. Lancashire. City of Winchester. County of Westmorland. ^ William Barrow Simonds, Esq. The Right Honourable Thomas Taylour (com- John Bonham Carter, Esq. monly called Earl of Bective), of Virginia Lodge, Cavan, Ireland. Borough of Lymington. William Lowther, of Lowther Castle, in the.said county, Esq. - George Charles Gordon Lennox (commonly called Lord George Charles Gordon Lennox). Borough of JVestbury. Borough of Tynemouth. John Lewis Phipps, of Westbury, Esq. Thomas Eustace Smith, Esq. Borough of Chatham. Arthur John Otway, of Harley-street, London, Borough of Ludlow.
  • 67 Summer 2010

    67 Summer 2010

    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 67 / Summer 2010 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals and the left Matthew Roberts Out of Chartism, into Liberalism Popular radicals and the Liberal Party Michael Freeden The Liberal Party and the New Liberalism John Shepherd The flight from the Liberal PartyLiberals who joined Labour, 1914–31 Matt Cole ‘An out-of-date word’ Jo Grimond and the left Peter Hellyer The Young Liberals and the left, 1965–70 Liberal Democrat History Group Liberal Leaders The latest publication from the Liberal Democrat History Group is Liberal Leaders: Leaders of the Liberal Party, SDP and Liberal Democrats since 1900. The sixty-page booklet contains concise biographies of every Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat leader since 1900. The total of sixteen biographies stretches from Henry Campbell-Bannerman to Nick Clegg, including such figures as H. H. Asquith, David Lloyd George, Jo Grimond, David Steel, David Owen and Paddy Ashdown. Liberal Leaders is available to Journal of Liberal History subscribers for the special price of £5 (normal price £6) with free p&p. To order, please send a cheque for £5.00 (made out to ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) to LDHG, 38 Salford Road, London SW2 4BQ. RESEARCH IN PROGRESS If you can help any of the individuals listed below with sources, contacts, or any other information — or if you know anyone who can — please pass on details to them. Details of other research projects in progress should be sent to the Editor (see page 3) for inclusion here.