Fairchild Tangerines Need Both Honey Bees, Pollinator Trees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fairchild Tangerines Need Both Honey Bees, Pollinator Trees Fairchild Tangerines Need Both Honey Bees, Pollinator Trees Item Type Article Authors Moffett, Joseph O.; Rodney, D. Ross Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Progressive Agriculture in Arizona Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 26/09/2021 10:05:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/300326 Fairchild Tangerines Need Both Honey Bees Pollinator Trees /l; yçïr, by Joseph O. Moffett and D. Ross Rodney* .., * Introduction This study was undertaken to de- termine the pollination requirements of Fairchild tangerines.Furr (1964 ) developed this hybrid by crossing '41F"'46.,..' . "r Orlando tangelo and Clementine tan- .x- . gerine.Krezdorn and Robinson (1958) found that Orlando tangelos ng have a greatly increased yield when . cross -pollinated. The other parent of 4r, the Fairchild tangerine, Clementine Fig. 1. - This Fairchild tangerine tree is caged with an Orlando tangelo. A colony of ( Algerian)tangerine,needscross - honey bees is located between the trees.Other Fairchild trees were caged both to pollination to produce a normal yield include and exclude honey bees. Table 1.Yield of fruit from Fairchild tangerine trees exposed to( Oppenheimer, 1948 and Van Horn different pollination at University of Arizona Yuma Mesaand Todd, 1954). Therefore, Reuther et al. (1967) suggests that provisions Branch Experiment Station. be made for cross -pollination of this Yield (lb.) from new hybrid until the facts can be learned about its pollination require- Trees caged ments. Repli- Trees caged with honey bees cation to exclude Trees caged Field + Orlando No. honey bees with honey bees trees tangelo 1969 Material and Methods 1 o Not tested 6 16 2 o 11 23 The orchard used in the two-year 3 o o 8 study (1969 -70) of pollination is lo- 4 <1 36 15 cated at the University of Arizona Avg. /tree 0 13 16 1970 ° Joseph O. Moffettis Entomologist with the Entomology Research Divisionof the 5 Not tested 25 47 23 Agricultural Research Service, 6 o 55 U.S. Depart - ,. 28 ment of Agriculture, and D. Ross Rodney is 7 10 75 56 Horticulturist with the Agricultural 8 11 92 Experi- 25 ment Station and Departmentof Horticul- Avg. /tree 12 67 33 ture, University of Arizona. 6 Yuma Mesa Branch Experiment Sta- tion where 99% of the insect cross - pollination of citrus is done by honey es Apis melli f era L.( Moffett and dney 1971 ). The Orlando tangelos Vand Fairchild tangerines, both on various rootstocks, were interplanted in 16 rows of 12 trees per row in March,1966. Immediately to the south were 11 rows of Red Blush grapefruit; the other three sides were adjacent to or near several other citrus cultivars including Marsh grapefruit, Lisbon lemon, Valencia orange, Ham- lin orange, and Clementine tangerine. Then in 1969, four of the Fairchild tangerine trees were caged individ- ually to exclude honey bees during the blooming period.Also each of a second group of four trees was caged with both a colony of honey bees and an Orlando tangelo tree.The cages were placed over the trees immedi- ately before flowering and removed at the end of the flowering in both years.In addition, four trees were left uncaged and thus exposed to the normal population of honey bees and to the citrus cultivars. The weight of Fig. 2. - This Fairchild tangerine tree was not caged.Several other citrus cultivars were nearby, and a moderately heavy population of honey bees was present to provide the fruit harvested from each tree in cross- pollination. 1969 was recorded ( Table 1). In 1970, the test was similar excepthad a slightly smaller( not signifi- level.Then, since more seeds per that four trees were caged with a cant )yield( 53 )pounds than thefruit indicate good pollination, the ony of honey bees, instead of being trees receiving the combined treat-pollen of Orlando tangelo may be ed so bees were excluded.Also ment.( The overall yield increasedpartly incompatible with Fairchild the weight of the harvest and numberfrom 1969 to 1970 because of thetangerine. of seeds per 10 fruit were recorded fornormal growth of the young trees.) each tree ( Tables 1 and 2). In 1970, fruit from trees caged with Conclusions A t test was used to compare eachhoney bees only had an average 2.2 GrowersofFairchildtangerines treatmentdirectlywithallotherseeds per fruit ( total 67 ), significant-should interplant pollinator trees at treatments.The data are shown inly fewer (5% level) than fruit fromproper intervalsintheir orchards. Tables 1 and 2. trees exposed to bees + tangelo ( 6.0They should also be sure that the seeds per fruit; total of 240). Also, population of honey bees is adequate Results and Discussion trees exposed to natural cross- polli-to provide good pollination. The dataforallreplicatesarenation had significantly more seeds Citrus cultivars other than Orlando shown in Tables 1 and 2.In 1969,per fruit( 21.5; total of 861) thantangelos may be better pollinators of the four trees caged to exclude beesboth other groups of trees at the 1%Fairchild tangerines. produced only one fruit; those caged with bees + Orlando tangelo pro- duced a total of 62 pounds of fruit,Table 2.Number of seeds in 10 fruit of Fairchild tangerines ex- which was a significantly better yield posed to different pollination practices at University of at the 1% level of confidence.Also, Arizona Yuma Mesa Branch Experiment Station. 1970. in 1970, the trees caged with bees and no pollinator tree produced only No. of seeds in fruit from one -third as much fruit ( 46) pounds as the trees caged with a pollinator Trees caged tree + bees (132) pounds so the Repli- Trees caged with honey bees combined treatment again gave a sig- cation Field with + an Orlando No. trees honey bees tangelo tree nificantly better yield(1 % level). The uncaged trees produced twice as 1 215 25 91 much fruit( 269) pounds astrees 2 198 No fruit set 63 3 222 10 51 caged with Orlando tangelo + bees 4 226 32 35 (significantly better at 5% level) in Avg. /No. ":?0, but in 1969, the uncaged trees seeds /fruit 22.5 2.2 6.0 7.
Recommended publications
  • Varietal Update
    November 17, 2016 FRESH NEWSLETTER FOR A NEW SEASON We are pleased to introduce an updated grower newsletter format that continues to provide seasonal varietal information, report on Sunkist sales and marketing activities while also highlighting consumer and industry trends that inform our sales and marketing strategies. Our staff will continue to share important regulatory information with growers separately from the newsletter to ensure timely news is communicated with the necessary urgency. Additionally, we encourage grower members to leverage the industry resources noted at the end of this newsletter for regular updates on important industry issues. As always, your feedback is important to us. Please e-mail questions, comments and suggestions about the newsletter to [email protected]. VARIETAL UPDATE ORANGES The Valencia orange crop has finished as the Navel orange season ramps up. The Navel crop is starting off with very good flavor and internal color. Focus is currently on sizes 88 and smaller as we wait for the season to progress with better overall color and more sizing options. Organic Navel oranges have also started shipping, with good availability and slightly larger sizing than the conventional crop; organic navels are currently at an 88/72/113 peak. The first packs of Cara Cara Navel oranges are expected the week of November 21/28, with initial sizing projected to be 88/72/113/56. Blood oranges are expected to start shipping the week of December 5. LEMONS Demand for lemons continues to grow, with bookings ahead of the past two years. Shipments are currently from districts 1 (D1), 2 (D2) and 3 (D3).
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Fruits Information Compiled by Sunkist Growers
    Commodity Fact Sheet Citrus Fruits Information compiled by Sunkist Growers How Produced – Citrus trees are propagated asexually mandarin orange and a lemon, are less acidic than traditional through a procedure known as grafting which fuses two lemons. different varieties of plants. In the case of citrus trees, one variety, the rootstock, is selected for Desert grapefruit are harvested October its hardiness and the other variety, the through March while summer grapefruit scion, is selected for its high-quality are available May through September. fruits. The rootstock, grown from a Specialty citrus include Melo Golds seed, is typically a two- to three-year- and Oro Blancos, grapefruit varieties old seedling while the scion is a bud that are popular with those preferring a from a mature tree. Through grafting, sweeter taste. Pummelos, or “Chinese” the scion fuses to the rootstock and grapefruit, considered a delicacy among becomes a new tree. In approximately many Asian cultures, are the largest of five years, the tree produces the same all citrus fruits. variety of fruit that was budded onto Almost a dozen different mandarin the rootstock. The successfully grafted and tangerine varieties, such as trees are sold to citrus growers through Clementines, Gold Nuggets, and wholesale nurseries and are certified Pixies, are available November through disease-free. There are approximately CITRUS VARIETIES May. Most are easy to peel and have a 270,000 bearing acres of citrus trees in lively flavor. California. Commodity Value – While Florida is the number one History – Oranges and lemons can be traced back to the producer of citrus fruits, the majority of their crop is made ancient Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of Subtropical Fruit Crops: Citrus
    IMPROVEMENT OF SUBTROPICAL FRUIT CROPS: CITRUS HAMILTON P. ÏRAUB, Senior Iloriiciilturist T. RALPH ROBCNSON, Senior Physiolo- gist Division of Frnil and Vegetable Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Tndusiry MORE than half of the 13 fruit crops known to have been cultivated longer than 4,000 years,according to the researches of DeCandolle (7)\ are tropical and subtropical fruits—mango, oliv^e, fig, date, banana, jujube, and pomegranate. The citrus fruits as a group, the lychee, and the persimmon have been cultivated for thousands of years in the Orient; the avocado and papaya were important food crops in the American Tropics and subtropics long before the discovery of the New World. Other types, such as the pineapple, granadilla, cherimoya, jaboticaba, etc., are of more recent introduction, and some of these have not received the attention of the plant breeder to any appreciable extent. Through the centuries preceding recorded history and up to recent times, progress in the improvement of most subtropical fruits was accomplished by the trial-error method, which is crude and usually expensive if measured by modern standards. With the general accept- ance of the Mendelian principles of heredity—unit characters, domi- nance, and segregation—early in the twentieth century a starting point was provided for the development of a truly modern science of genetics. In this article it is the purpose to consider how subtropical citrus fruit crops have been improved, are now being improved, or are likel3^ to be improved by scientific breeding. Each of the more important crops will be considered more or less in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • ECHO's Catalogue and Compendium of Warm Climate Fruits
    ECHO's Catalogue and Compendium of Warm Climate Fruits Featuring both common and hard-to-find fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices and bamboo for Southwest Florida ECHO's Catalogue and Compendium of Warm Climate Fruits Featuring both common and hard-to-find fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices and bamboo for Southwest Florida D. Blank, A. Boss, R. Cohen and T. Watkins, Editors Contributing Authors: Dr. Martin Price, Daniel P. Blank, Cory Thede, Peggy Boshart, Hiedi Hans Peterson Artwork by Christi Sobel This catalogue and compendium are the result of the cumulative experi- ence and knowledge of dedicated ECHO staff members, interns and vol- unteers. Contained in this document, in a practical and straight-forward style, are the insights, observations, and recommendations from ECHO’s 25 year history as an authority on tropical and subtropical fruit in South- west Florida. Our desire is that this document will inspire greater enthusi- asm and appreciation for growing and enjoying the wonderful diversity of warm climate fruits. We hope you enjoy this new edition of our catalogue and wish you many successes with tropical fruits! Also available online at: www.echonet.org ECHO’s Tropical Fruit Nursery Educational Concerns for Hunger Organization 17391 Durrance Rd. North Fort Myers, FL 33917 (239) 567-1900 FAX (239) 543-5317 Email: [email protected] This material is copyrighted 1992. Reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited. Revised May 1996, Sept 1998, May 2002 and March 2007. Fruiting Trees, Shrubs and Herbaceous Plants Table of Contents 1. Fruiting Trees, Shrubs and Herbaceous Plants 2 2. Trees for the Enthusiast 34 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Parental Chromosomes in Sexual
    J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 79 (2): 129–134. 2010. Available online at www.jstage.jst.go.jp/browse/jjshs1 JSHS © 2010 Identification of Parental Chromosomes in Sexual Intergeneric Hybrid Progenies between Citrus Cultivar ‘Nanpu’ Tangor and Citropsis schweinfurthii in the Subfamily Aurantioideae Kichi Yasuda1, Masaki Yahata2, Masayoshi Shigyo3, Ryoji Matsumoto4, Tsutomu Yabuya5 and Hisato Kunitake5* 1The Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Agriculture and Engineering, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan 2The Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan 3Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan 4The Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Saga 840-8502, Japan 5Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan To obtain cytogenetic information on sexual intergeneric hybrid progenies between Citropsis schweinfurthii and Citrus in situ ‘Nanpu’ tangor ( spp.), we conducted Chromomycin A3 (CMA) chromosome banding and genomic hybridization (GISH) analyses. The CMA karyotype composition of C. schweinfurthii was very simple (14D + 4E), while that of ‘Nanpu’ tangor showed more complicated chromosome types (1A + 4C + 5D + 8E). Two progenies with C. schweinfurthii as the maternal parent showed a karyotype of 1A + 1C + 11D + 5E, suggesting that each of the type A and C chromosomes was inherited from ‘Nanpu’ tangor. GISH-CMA analysis in one of these progenies showed a clear distinction between parental chromosomes, and revealed that the hybrid progeny arose due to fertilization between a female gamete with a CMA karyotype composition of 7D + 2E from C. schweinfurthii and a male 1A + 1C + 4D + 3E gamete from ‘Nanpu’ tangor. The result suggests that C. schweinfurthii had homomorphic homologous chromosomes as a wild species, while ‘Nanpu’ tangor had heteromorphic homologous chromosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Disease-Resistant Rootstocks Urgently Neededby Citrus Growers
    FLORIDA STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 201 20 years of age before they bloomed in North recent plantings of this Rhodesian mahogany ern Rhodesia, Africa. in southern and south central parts of Florida The mother mahogany tree in Miami, which show that young seedlings of this species have is approximately 20 years old, probably came survived frosts, hurricanes, and dry weather from one of Dr. W. L. Thompson's numerous when planted in hammocks, but have not been introductions of Khaya nyasica seed from Mt. able to fare for themselves under exposed Silinda, Southern Rhodesia, the earliest intro conditions in the open. If these trees can sur duction being received in 1902 (1). This tree vive and reproduce themselves under South in the Miami City Cemetery most likely came Florida conditions, as at least one tree has from Plant Introduction No. 59293 of Dr. done to date, there may well be possibilities Thompson's which arrived in Washington, D. for this new tree crop in this hemisphere. C, April 19, 1924. 1. Lynch, S. J., and H. S. Wolfe. Khaya The Khaya nyasica plantings among Carib nyasica, a new mahogany for South Florida. bean pine at the Sub-Tropical Experiment Sta Proc. Florida State Hort. Soc. 55:113-116, 1942. tion (2) continue to show promise, as well as 2. Lynch, S. J., and H. S. Wolfe. Future plantings at the Dade County nursery on Red may see mahogany forests in Florida. Florida Road, Coconut Grove, Miami, Florida. More Grower, August, 1942. NEW DISEASE-RESISTANT ROOTSTOCKS URGENTLY NEEDED BY CITRUS GROWERS WALTER T.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
    United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Appeal
    Citrus appeal New varieties, colors and textures bring a sexy look to the produce aisle By Susan Taylor, Special to Tribune Newspapers 11:17 a.m. CST, January 10, 2011 Once the flannel nightgown of the fruit world, citrus has a new look. Decked out in a dazzling display of sun-drenched colors, zipper skins and food toys, citrus is the new lingerie. As citrus season gets into full swing, grocery store produce aisles are piled high with shiny spheres of orange, yellow and green. Oranges that are salmon pink or deep red inside share shelf space with look-alike navel oranges. Small, seedless mandarins, with easy-to-peel zipper skins and adorable names like Cuties and Darlings are stacked in colorful cardboard crates and mesh bags to beckon shoppers. Bright yellow Buddha's hands, the ancient citrus variety that has fingers but no flesh, perfumes any room in which it resides. It's showing up in the specialty produce section of some supermarkets. "Some varieties have been around for a while, but people are rediscovering them because they can afford them," said Peter Testa, president of Testa Produce, an Illinois firm specializing in hard-to-find produce. Among the rediscovered varieties are blood oranges, Key limes and Satsuma mandarins. In the past, these items were in short supply, available infrequently, and expensive. Finger limes from Australia also have been around, but nobody really noticed them until recently, Testa said. The pinky-sizes finger limes are the "it" produce for chefs and others who like to play with food. The individual pockets of juice don't break when squeezed from the fruit; they look like caviar and enhance the flavor — and fun — of all kinds of dishes, including salads, main courses and desserts.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Genetic Resources in California
    Citrus Genetic Resources in California Analysis and Recommendations for Long-Term Conservation Report of the Citrus Genetic Resources Assessment Task Force T.L. Kahn, R.R. Krueger, D.J. Gumpf, M.L. Roose, M.L. Arpaia, T.A. Batkin, J.A. Bash, O.J. Bier, M.T. Clegg, S.T. Cockerham, C.W. Coggins Jr., D. Durling, G. Elliott, P.A. Mauk, P.E. McGuire, C. Orman, C.O. Qualset, P.A. Roberts, R.K. Soost, J. Turco, S.G. Van Gundy, and B. Zuckerman Report No. 22 June 2001 Published by Genetic Resources Conservation Program Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA i This report is one of a series published by the University of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program (technical editor: P.E. McGuire) as part of the public information function of the Program. The Program sponsors projects in the collection, inventory, maintenance, preservation, and utilization of genetic resources important for the State of California as well as research and education in conservation biology. Further information about the Program may be obtained from: Genetic Resources Conservation Program University of California One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 USA (530) 754-8501 FAX (530) 754-8505 e-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.grcp.ucdavis.edu/ Additional copies of this report may be ordered from this address. Citation: Kahn TL, RR Krueger, DJ Gumpf, ML Roose, ML Arpaia, TA Batkin, JA Bash, OJ Bier, MT Clegg, ST Cockerham, CW Coggins Jr, D Durling, G Elliott, PA Mauk, PE McGuire, C Orman, CO Qualset, PA Roberts, RK Soost, J Turco, SG Van Gundy, and B Zuckerman.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Isolation of Homogeneous Genotypes of Citrus Tristeza Virus for Use in Virus Control Through Cross Protection
    Detection and isolation of homogeneous genotypes of Citrus tristeza virus for use in virus control through cross protection. By Kirsti Snyders (28121903) Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae Microbiology (MSc.) In the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa Supervisor: Prof. G. Pietersen Submitted: April 2015 Declaration of originality I, …………………………........... declare that the thesis/dissertation, which I hereby submit for the degree …………………............................ at the University of Pretoria, is my own work and has not previously been submitted by me for a degree at this or any other tertiary institution. SIGNATURE: ..………………………….. DATE: …………………………………. i Acknowledgements I would like to extend my most sincere gratitude to the following people, as this research project would not have been possible without them: First and foremost, to my heavenly father for giving me the talent and strength to pursue my dreams, for blessing me with amazing people in my life and carrying me through all the challenging times. My family for their unconditional love and support during this chapter in my life. Thank you for the everyday encouragement, especially through the testing parts. My supervisor, Prof. Gerhard Pietersen, for his continuous support and opportunities. Thank you for always making time to help in any possible way. My lab colleagues; David Read, Ronel Viljoen, Jennifer Wayland, Jackie Lubbe and Megan Harris for the support and friendship. I am extremely grateful to have such amazing friends in my life. Dr. Stephanus van Vuuren (Oom Fanie) for providing required information for the write up of my dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus Fruits Information Compiled by Sunkist Growers
    Commodity Fact Sheet Citrus Fruits Information compiled by Sunkist Growers How Produced – Citrus trees are propagated asexually Desert grapefruit, can be found June through July, while sum- through a method called grafting. Grafting is the process of mer grapefruit is available June through September. Specialty fusing two different varieties of plants citrus include Melo Golds and Oro Blan- together. In the case of citrus trees, one cos, grapefruit varieties that are popular variety is selected for its hardiness and with those preferring a sweeter taste. is called rootstock. The rootstock is typ- Pummelos, or “Chinese” grapefruit, are ically a two to three year-old seedling the largest of all citrus fruits and con- grown from a seed. The other variety is sidered a delicacy among many Asian selected for its high-quality fruits and is cultures. called scion. The scion is a bud from an already mature tree. Through grafting, Almost a dozen different Mandarin tan- the scion fuses to the rootstock and be- gerine varieties, such as Clementines, comes a new tree. In approximately five are available November through May. years, the tree will produce the same Most Mandarins are easy to peel and variety of fruit that was budded onto have a lively flavor. the rootstock. The successfully grafted – While Florida is trees are sold to citrus growers through Commodity Value the number one producer of citrus fruits, wholesale nurseries and are certified Citrus Varieties the majority of their crop is made into disease-free. There are approximately processed juice products. California 271,000 bearing acres of citrus trees in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Sexual Hybrid Progenies for Clarifying the Phylogenic Relationship Between Citrus and Citropsis Species
    J. AMER. SOC. HORT. SCI. 131(6):764–769. 2006. Production of Sexual Hybrid Progenies for Clarifying the Phylogenic Relationship between Citrus and Citropsis species Masaki Yahata1 The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, 1-21-24 Korimoto, Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan Hisato Kunitake2, Kiichi Yasuda, and Kensuke Yamashita Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuenkibanadainishi, Miyazaki-shi, Miyazaki 889-2192, Japan Haruki Komatsu School of Agriculture, Kyushu Tokai University, Kawayo, Minamiaso-mura, Aso-gun, Kumamoto 869- 1404, Japan Ryoji Matsumoto Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Honjyo-machi, Saga-shi, Saga 840-8502, Japan ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Aurantioideae, CAPS, Citropsis schweinfurthii, fl ow cytometry, RAPD, nuclear genome size ABSTRACT. The reciprocal crosses between two citrus cultivars and Citropsis schweinfurthii (Engl.) Swing. & M. Kell. were conducted. The cross between ‘Nanpu’ tangor {‘Kiyomi’ tangor (Citrus unshiu Marc. x C. sinensis Osbeck) x ‘Fairchild’ tangerine-tangelo [clementine (C. clementina hort. ex Tanaka) x ‘Orlando’ tangelo (C. paradisi Macf. x C. reticulata Blanco)]} and C. schweinfurthii produced some developed seeds with an average weight approximately 1/10 of that of the seeds obtained from open pollination in ‘Nanpu’ tangor. These seeds germinated on Murashige and Tucker medium, and three and 28 seedlings were obtained from crosses using C. schweinfurthii as the female and the male parent, respectively. The absolute nuclear genome size of these seedlings [~0.84 pg of DNA content per somatic nucleus (2C)] was intermediate of that of the ‘Nanpu’ tangor (0.78 pg/2C) and C. schweinfurthii (0.90 pg/2C) seedlings. The chromosome counts of the young leaves revealed that they were diploids (2n = 2X = 18).
    [Show full text]