Chapter 1: Introduction and Theoretical Framework
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
National Standards for the Teaching of English in Colombia: A Critical Discourse Analysis Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Guerrero-Nieto, Carmen Helena Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 22:55:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195935 NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH IN COLOMBIA: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. By Carmen Helena Guerrero Nieto ------------------------------------------------ Copyright © Carmen Helena Guerrero Nieto 2009 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND TEACHING INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM In partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2009 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Carmen Helena Guerrero Nieto entitled National Standards for the Teaching of English in Colombia: A Critical Discourse Analysis and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/30/09 Linda Waugh ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/30/09 Iliana Reyes ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/30/09 Richard Ruiz Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and I recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. ___________________________________________________________Date: 04/30/09 Dissertation Director: Linda Waugh 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: Carmen Helena Guerrero Nieto 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Along the journey towards the completion of my degree, I received the support, care, and company of professors, friends, and family. To all of them: THANK YOU. First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Dr. Linda Waugh who welcomed me in the SLAT program and accompanied me all along the process from being a student to achieving my degree. She has been a great inspiration for me at all levels: as a teacher, researcher, administrator, scholar, and mentor. I feel privileged to have had her as my guide because she was always willing to listen, read, and revise my ideas. I am very grateful to my committee members, Dr. Iliana Reyes and Dr. Richard Ruiz, whose provocative thoughts allowed me to have a broader perspective when looking at my data and writing my dissertation. Special thanks goes to the ID2 study group with whom I shared afternoons of readings, discussions, insights and ideas. To Bryan Meadows and Yoo Kyung Sung: their comments, feedback, and suggestions helped me improved my work. Sharing our frustration and joy in our “dissertation” study group helped me understand I was not alone. I would like to acknowledge the company of my Colombian friends in Tucson; they shared with me my most joyful moments and cared for me during the hard ones. Knowing they were there for me gave me the strength to keep going. Another dear friend whom I owe a great deal of gratitude is Yang Yang; she has become more than a friend, a sister to me. During the times when I felt frustrated, tired, or confused, she had a word of wisdom that helped me look ahead. Long chats on Skype with my dearest friend and academic buddy, Alvaro Quintero, nurtured my intellect and allowed me to be closer to our Colombian reality. My mom and dad deserve my sincere acknowledgement and gratitude because they have been by my side all my life; they have had faith in me and have believed I would get far and no matter how old I am, I am always their little girl. And to Diego, my nephew, who is too young to understand the profound wound left in my heart because I have not seen him growing up. Finally, I am deeply grateful to the Fulbright Commission, Colciencias, and Universidad Distrital because their joint effort made possible the grant that financed my study. 5 DEDICATION To my dearest husband, Edgar Zapata, who accepted to walk this journey with me and has encouraged me to fly higher. You make my days shine with your unconditional love. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. 9 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................... 13 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 16 Discourse....................................................................................................................... 17 Legitimization ........................................................................................................... 20 Naturalization ............................................................................................................ 23 Circulation of Discourse ........................................................................................... 27 Critical Discourse Analysis ........................................................................................... 31 History of CDA ......................................................................................................... 32 The Goals of CDA .................................................................................................... 36 Symbolic Power ............................................................................................................ 41 Linguistic Capital ...................................................................................................... 44 Language as Symbolic Capital .................................................................................. 49 Language as Symbolic Power ................................................................................... 50 CHAPTER 2: RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................... 55 Object of Study ............................................................................................................. 55 Research Questions ....................................................................................................... 55 Research Methodology ................................................................................................. 58 Process of Data Analysis .............................................................................................. 63 Primary and Secondary Data Sources ........................................................................... 64 CHAPTER 3: CONTEXTUALIZATION OF MULTILINGUISM IN COLOMBIA ..... 67 Indigenous Languages .................................................................................................. 69 Afro-Caribbean Languages ........................................................................................... 75 Palenquero..................................................................................................................... 76 San Andrés and Providence Creole English. ................................................................ 79 7 Spanish .......................................................................................................................... 85 English and Other Foreign Languages (but mainly English)........................................ 92 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 101 CHAPTER 4: THE MEANING OF BILINGUALISM WITHIN THE COLOMBIAN CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................... 103 Bilingualism Means Speaking English. ...................................................................... 104 Bilingualism is a Packed, Monolithic and Homogenous goal .................................... 116 Students as a Monolithic Population....................................................................... 116 All students will attain level B1, and along with that, they are recognized as legitimate users of the L2 ........................................................................................ 122 All Students will be equally proficient ................................................................... 126 English Language has one single standard variety ................................................