Bonneville Fish Hatchery

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

BONNEVILLE WELCOME TO BONNEVILLE HATCHERY – FISH Supporting salmon runs since 1909 Bonneville Hatchery sits on Tanner Creek in the Following the construction of Bonneville Dam in HATCHERY Columbia River Gorge, about 40 miles east of Portland, the 1930s, the hatchery was expanded to increase Information Oregon. Tanner Creek flows into the Columbia juvenile fish-rearing capacity from 6 million to 11 Self-guided tour map approximately 145 miles upriver from the ocean. The million salmon. Another expansion took place in the Self-guided tour map for kids hatchery, managed by the Oregon Department of Fish mid-1950s as part of the Columbia River Fisheries Spawning viewing (available during spawning season) Hatchery informational video and Wildlife, raises salmon and steelhead for sport, Development Program. commercial and tribal fisheries in the lower Columbia Sturgeon Center exhibit The 1968 construction of the John Day Dam flooded River and along the northern Oregon Coast. Safety rules the spawning grounds of 30,000 fall chinook. To When visiting the hatchery, please observe the following rules: Tanner Creek and nine hatchery wells provide water for compensate for half of the loss, the U.S. Army Corps • Stay clear of hatchery equipment. Directions rearing fall chinook salmon, coho salmon, and summer of Engineers spent $8 million in the 1970s to enlarge • Keep off all pond walkways. From I-84, take Exit 40 to Bonneville Dam/Fish Hatchery. and winter steelhead. A waterfall not quite a mile above Bonneville Hatchery and increase its fish-rearing • Do not climb on equipment, ponds or rocks. Follow the signs to the hatchery and park in the parking lot. the creek’s mouth prevents fish passage beyond capacity. • Park all vehicles in the appropriate parking area. Bus and RV that point. parking are available. Visitor hours In 1998 the hatchery added a specialized rearing April – August: 7:30 a.m. – 8 p.m. • Never try to touch the fish or place your hands or foreign building to house the Grande Ronde Basin captive objects in the water. This could harm both you and the fish. September – October: 7:30 a.m. – 7 p.m. November – March: 7:30 a.m. – 5 p.m. History broodstock program for spring chinook, a threatened Special features Closed Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s Day. Bonneville Hatchery opened in 1909 as Central Hatchery species. This experimental conservation hatchery • Spawning room – so-called because the facility served as a central program rears salmon for the Grande Ronde Basin, • Adult holding ponds Office hours hatching and rearing site for eggs taken at other which drains into the Snake River, a main tributary of • Monday – Friday, 7:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Rearing ponds hatcheries. Bonneville is one of the oldest hatcheries in the Columbia. The facility is closed to the public to • Rainbow trout ponds Closed all official holidays. • Outdoor white sturgeon pond Oregon and the largest in terms of fish production. minimize stress and other impacts on the fish. • Sturgeon viewing center Maps • Interpretive displays Self-guided tour maps are available at the hatchery in • Hatchery video the Spawning Room Visitor’s Center. Tour maps also are • Bonneville gift shop available by mail. Please call 541-374-8393 to request a copy. Visitors • Outside accessible restrooms Employees are available during working hours to answer any questions you may have. Guide Local sites of interest • Bonneville Locks and Dam • U.S. Forest Service hiking trails • Old Columbia River Highway • Cascade Locks Partners and funding ODFW operates Bonneville Hatchery with funding from the Oregon Department U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and NOAA Fisheries. Funds of Fish and Wildlife for the captive broodstock program come from the Bonneville Northwest Oregon Power Administration. Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation 70543 NE Herman Loop operates the gift shop. Cascade Locks, OR 97014 (541) 374-8393 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife strategy, because most of the When fish are ready for spawning, a hatchery technician Rearing Fish reared and released young do not survive the long operates a mechanical crowder that moves fish toward a lift. Fall chinook fry spend the Each year, Bonneville Hatchery raises 1.2 million coho, journey to the ocean and back, The lift raises fish to an anesthetic tank and onto the sorting winter and spring in outside 8.5 million fall chinook, 215,000 summer steelhead and whether they hatch in the wild table in the spawning room. Hatchery workers place eggs rearing ponds. Bonneville 60,000 winter steelhead. The coho are released into a from gravel nests called redds taken from females into buckets where upriver bright fall chinook are pipeline that takes them to Tanner Creek and out into they are fertilized with sperm from males. released as 4-inch fingerlings after six the Columbia River directly from the ponds. The fall All salmon die naturally after spawning, months of rearing. Umatilla fall chinook chinook are split between Tanner Creek, the Umatilla but in the hatchery setting adult fish and coho salmon are released as 6- to River and Ringold Hatchery, which is located in the are killed humanely prior to the artificial 8-inch smolts after one year of rearing. Hanford Reach on the Columbia River. spawning process. Nets over the ponds reduce predation by Best viewing opportunities birds feeding on the young fish. Bonneville Hatchery also rears fish for hatcheries in Incubation other river basins. Summer steelhead are spawned at • See adult salmon spawning late Bonneville Hatchery can Feeding South Santiam Hatchery and the eggs are transferred October to early December. incubate up to 30 million to Bonneville Hatchery. The eggs are incubated and • Visit the rainbow trout ponds Hatchery workers feed the fry each eggs annually. After hour during daylight hours. As the fry grow, automatic feeders reared in the outside ponds for one year. They then year-round. spawning, the fertilized are transferred to Sandy and Clackamas hatcheries • Visit the white sturgeon viewing center supplement hand feeding. Fry receive dry pellets made from eggs are transferred to animal, vegetable and mineral products. The pellets come in for acclimation and are released into each river. Winter year-round. trays in the incubation steelhead are spawned at Sandy Hatchery and the • Take a self-guided walking tour various sizes for feeding fish of different ages. Each pound a room. The eggs develop at young fish gains requires about eggs are transported to Bonneville. The eggs then year-round. a rate controlled by the temperature of the are incubated and reared for one year before being • one pound of fish food. See adult salmon August through water that continuously flows over them. transported back to Sandy Hatchery for acclimation November at the holding ponds or at and release into the Sandy River. the fish ladder and viewing window at nearby Bonneville Dam. Marking fish prior to release or are raised in a hatchery. For example, Salmon life cycle of every 1,000 salmon that Bonneville Before release, crews mark a portion of the young Chinook, coho salmon and Hatchery releases, only three return salmon and all steelhead by clipping their adipose fins Steelhead or by mechanically steelhead are “anadromous” fish as adults. On their journey, salmon Hatching occurs in inserting a tiny coded species. That means they hatch encounter predators, dams that as few as 50 days wire tag into each in fresh water, then swim to the impede their travel, river and shore with 52° water. Fish that hatch in the incubators salmon’s snout. ocean when they reach the environments that may be harmful, are known as sac fry. After these small Fisheries technicians smolt stage at about 6 inches and variable ocean conditions. fish have absorbed the yolk – a process working on docks long. Chinook generally Sport, commercial and tribal called “buttoning up” – they are called or at canneries or migrate at 6 to 12 months fisheries also catch salmon to fry and instinctively swim upward in conducting creel and coho at 18 months. While provide food for people. search of food. Hatchery technicians then surveys remove in the ocean they will grow move the fry to the rearing ponds. and mature to adulthood. All salmon die after spawning, the snouts of fin-clipped which completes their life cycle. Coho Salmon fish caught in sport and Chinook return from the ocean Steelhead, however, may return to Fish diseases commercial fisheries. when they are 3 to 5 years old the ocean one or more times. Hatchery fish can be They freeze the snouts and coho when they are 3 to 4 Spawning susceptible to disease and later recover the tags years old. Steelhead trout generally due to the large numbers using a metal detector. return the first time after they are 3 years From August through November, returning The information recorded adult fall chinook and coho move from Tanner of fish in rearing facilities old. They swim back upriver to their stream and the stress of the on the tags helps fisheries or hatchery of origin to spawn where their life began. Creek into the hatchery holding pond. Hatchery workers managers determine the sort and count fish by species and sex. All female and male crowded environment. Fish These fish serve as parents for the next generation. pathologists routinely take hatchery of origin, the fish needed for spawning are held from one to three months Chinook release date and location, and where and how many Each female chinook salmon carries about 4,500 eggs, until they are “ripe” or ready to spawn. Up to 30,000 adult fish tissue samples and Salmon fish have been harvested. and each coho about 2,800 eggs.
Recommended publications
  • Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Nocillado, Josephine N.; Liao, I Chiu Download date 01/10/2021 00:41:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/8923 Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan Josephine N. Nocilladoand I Chiu Liao Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 199 Hou-Ih Road, Keelung 202 Taiwan T y p i c al broodstock ponds (right) in Taiwan. Striped threadfm broodstock are held in the pond on the lower right. At left is formulated broodstock diet During the Lunar New Year, the grandest of all holidays in Tai­ wan, images of fish are prominently displayed everywhere. Among the Taiwanese, fish is considered auspicious and a sym­ bol of bounty. This is because the pronunciation of “fish” (yü) is similar to that of “surplus” (yü), indicating abundance and pros­ perity. A fish specialty, with the fish preferably presented in its entirety, is a constant fare on the dining table during special occa­ sions. And in the true Taiwanese tradition, this most special dish is served as the last course, something truly worth waiting for, and remembered. It was in the 1960s that the first successes on artificial propa­ Not surprisingly, fish culture is itself an age-old traditiongation in were achieved, this time in several species of Chinese carps Taiwan. Rearing fish in captivity is almost an art form for manyand other tilapias. Art and science combined, fish propagation in Taiwanese aquafarmers who inherited the skill from many ofTaiwan their took off to a great start.
  • Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Revision 2.0 (2/1/2017) University of Miami Article TITLE DESCRIPTION AUTHORS SOURCE YEAR TOPICS Number Habitat 1 Gasterosteus canadus Linné [Latin] [No Abstract Available - First known description of cobia morphology in Carolina habitat by D. Garden.] Linnaeus, C. Systema Naturæ, ed. 12, vol. 1, 491 1766 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) Ichthyologie, vol. 10, Iconibus ex 2 Scomber niger Bloch [No Abstract Available - Description and alternative nomenclature of cobia.] Bloch, M. E. 1793 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) illustratum. Berlin. p . 48 The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the Under this head was to be carried on the study of the useful aquatic animals and plants of the country, as well as of seals, whales, tmtles, fishes, lobsters, crabs, oysters, clams, etc., sponges, and marine plants aml inorganic products of U.S. Commission on Fisheries, Washington, 3 United States. Section 1: Natural history of Goode, G.B. 1884 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) the sea with reference to (A) geographical distribution, (B) size, (C) abundance, (D) migrations and movements, (E) food and rate of growth, (F) mode of reproduction, (G) economic value and uses. D.C., 895 p. useful aquatic animals Notes on the occurrence of a young crab- Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 4 eater (Elecate canada), from the lower [No Abstract Available - A description of cobia in the lower Hudson Eiver.] Fisher, A.K. 1891 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) 13, 195 Hudson Valley, New York The nomenclature of Rachicentron or Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum Habitat 5 Elacate, a genus of acanthopterygian The universally accepted name Elucate must unfortunately be supplanted by one entirely unknown to fame, overlooked by all naturalists, and found in no nomenclator.
  • Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 2019 CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 \\_Ii--/}// \<�\\:I,. t.;w1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute !1�= Practical Hand Book on CMFR Seed Production of Cobia and Silver Pompano Prepared by Dr.A.K.AbdulNazar Dr. R. layakumar Dr. G. Tamilmani Dr. M. Sakthivel Dr. P. Ramesh Kumar Dr.K.K.Anikuttan M.Sankar Mandapam Regional Centre of CMFRI Mandapam Camp - 623 520 Tamil Nadu, India 2019 © 2019 ICAR –Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 Published by Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan Director !CAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Kochi - 682 018 Typeset and Printed by Rehana Offset Printers, Srivilliputtur - 626 125 Phone : 04563-260383, E-mail : [email protected] PREFACE Mariculture – the farming and husbandry of marine plants and animals of commercial importance, is an untapped sector of sea food production in India. Mariculture has been contributing substantially to the global fish production in recent years. It accounted for about 29.2 per cent of world aquaculture production by value. It is a fact that India is still in infancy in mariculture production in the global scenario. Since mariculture is the only hope for increasing seafood production in the coming years, the research and development in this sector is of paramount importance. In fact, such thrust was not given in India and hence, it was felt necessary to develop viable seed production and farming technologies to develop mariculture. The R&D efforts in this direction yielded commendable results within a few years and Mandapam Regional Centre of ICAR CMFRI succeeded in captive breeding and seed production of two high value marine fishes namely, Cobia, Rachycentron canadum and Silver pompano, Trachinotus blochii for the first time in the country.
  • (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019 The DNR Fisheries Division Fish Production Section (FPS) maintains and operates six extensive, cold water fish hatcheries, three of which also produce cool water species (Table 1). There are also several ancillary programs managed by FPS to provide the support necessary to run a quality fish stocking program. Those include Fish Health and Quality, Fish Stocking, Fish Marking, and Electronics. Table 1. Location of and species reared by Michigan DNR Fish Hatcheries Hatchery Name Location Species Reared Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Wolf Lake State Fish Hatchery Mattawan (Van Buren County) Muskellunge, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Harrietta State Fish Hatchery Harrietta (Wexford County) Atlantic Salmon Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Platte River State Fish Hatchery Honor (Benzie County) Atlantic Salmon, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Oden State Fish Hatchery Alanson (Emmet County) Arctic Grayling Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Thompson State Fish Hatchery Thompson (Schoolcraft County) Walleye Brook Trout, Lake Trout, Splake Marquette State Fish Hatchery Marquette (Marquette County) (Hybrid) Recreational fishing in Michigan is a significant economic driver, estimated at $2.3 billion. Fish stocking is one of the few tools available for fisheries professionals to use in managing the state’s world-class fisheries. Fish are stocked for three primary reasons: • Provide diverse fishing opportunities (e.g. walleye, steelhead) • Maintain ecosystem balance (e.g. Chinook salmon) • Rehabilitate depressed fish populations (e.g. lake sturgeon) The following summarizes the performance of the six DNR fish production facilities in five areas of focus during fiscal year 2019. Broodstock Management Broodstock management includes rearing and maintenance of captive brood populations at Oden Hatchery and Marquette Hatchery, as well as collecting gametes from feral stock.
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
  • Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    MEGAPESCA Rua Gago Coutinho 11 Valado de Santa Quitéria 2460 – 207 Alfeizerão Portugal Telephone: (+351) 262 990 372 Fax: (+351) 262 990 496 EMAIL: [email protected] Website: http://www.megapesca.com MARINE AQUACULTURE IN EGYPT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 2 PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF FISH IN EGYPT......................................................2 2.1 FISH PRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................2 2.2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN FISHERY PRODUCTS .........................................................................5 2.3 FISH SUPPLIES TO MARKET AND CONSUMPTION .........................................................................5 2.4 CONTRIBUTION OF AQUACULTURE TO FISH CONSUMPTION........................................................6 2.5 PRICES OF FISH PRODUCTS FROM AQUACULTURE ......................................................................8 2.5.1 Seabass and seabream......................................................................................................9 3 OVERVIEW OF SECTOR DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 1996 .................................................13 3.1 PRODUCTION OF MARINE SPECIES............................................................................................13 3.1.1 North Sinai......................................................................................................................13
  • Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Eller, Jessica, "Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11231. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11231 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES BY JESSICA JEAN ELLER Bachelor of Arts, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, Alaska, 2011 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Len Broberg, Chair Environmental Studies Shawn Johnson Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy Shoren Brown Environmental Studies Eller, Jessica, Master of Science, Spring 2018 Environmental Studies POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES Chairperson: Len Broberg Using an adapted Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) - Evaluation, this study analyzes policy regulating Alaska salmon hatcheries to evaluate its effectiveness at sustaining wild salmon runs. When Alaska became a state in 1959, its salmon industry was suffering from years of overfishing.
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
  • A Review of Hatchery Reform Science in Washington State

    A Review of Hatchery Reform Science in Washington State

    A review of hatchery reform science in Washington State Joseph H. Anderson, Kenneth I. Warheit, Bethany E. Craig, Todd R. Seamons and Alf H. Haukenes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Final report to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission January 23 2020 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 10 BENEFITS OF HATCHERIES ............................................................................................................. 13 Harvest benefits ........................................................................................................................ 13 Economic benefits ................................................................................................................. 14 Social and cultural benefits ................................................................................................... 15 Treaty rights and tribal values ............................................................................................... 17 Mitigation .............................................................................................................................. 18 Conservation benefits ............................................................................................................... 19 Population conservation ......................................................................................................
  • A Review of Cage Aquaculture: Asia (Excluding China)

    A Review of Cage Aquaculture: Asia (Excluding China)

    18 Cage aquaculture production 2005 Data were taken from fisheries statistics submitted to FAO by the member countries for 2005. In case 2005 data were not available, 2004 data were used. Map background image Blue Marble: Next generation courtesy of NASA’s Earth Observatory 19 A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China) 21 A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China) Sena S. De Silva1 and Michael J. Phillips1 De Silva, S.S. and Phillips, M.J. A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China). In M. Halwart, D. Soto and J.R. Arthur (eds). Cage aquaculture – Regional reviews and global overview, pp. 18–48. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 498. Rome, FAO. 2007. 241 pp. ABSTRACT Cage farming in Asia is practiced in fresh, brackish and inshore coastal waters. Freshwater cage farming is a very old tradition that is thought to have originated in some of the Mekong Basin countries. It currently occurs in all freshwater habitats and is extremely diverse in nature, varying in cage design, intensity of practice, husbandry methods and the species farmed. In general, freshwater cage farming is practiced on a small scale, but in some instances clustering of cage operations can contribute a significant level of production, as in the case of pangasiid catfish culture in the Mekong Delta and the combination of common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) farming in some Indonesian reservoirs. Overall, although clear-cut statistics are not available, cage farming is thought to be the most predominant form of freshwater aquaculture in Asia. In this paper, freshwater cage farming is only briefly considered; it has recently been reviewed by the authors (see Phillips and De Silva, 2006).
  • Fish Hatchery Production Plan

    Fish Hatchery Production Plan

    revised fish hatchery production plan final environmental assessment NOTE: In May 2006, the Mitigation Commission revised this 1998 Plan Revision to make minor changes to two cold-water hatcheries included herein: Whiterocks State Fish Hatchery and Jones Hole National Fish Hatchery. Project production levels and funding at all other facilities included in this 1998 Plan remain unchanged. The 2006 revision is located at the end of this 1998 Plan. U.s. fish and wildlife service utah reclamation mitigation and conservation commission february 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE, NEED AND ISSUES Introduction .............................................................1-1 Background .............................................................1-1 Purpose and Need ........................................................1-2 Proposed Action ..........................................................1-9 Issue Identification........................................................1-12 CHAPTER 2 proposed action and ALTERNATIVES Introduction .............................................................2-1 No Action Alternative.....................................................2-1 Proposed Action Alternative ................................................2-2 Maximum Capacity Alternative..............................................2-4 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated.......................................2-4 CHAPTER 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Analysis................................................................3-1 Purpose and Need ........................................................3-7
  • “Pompano Farms – 2004”

    “Pompano Farms – 2004”

    “POMPANO FARMS – 2004” M.F. McMaster, T.C. Kloth, J.F. Coburn Mariculture Technologies International, Inc. Oak Hill, FL Background: The authors of this article are the principals of a Florida Corporation named Mariculture Technologies International, Inc. (MTI). This group was the first to farm the Florida Pompano (Trachinotus carolinus) starting in 1971. Developing technical skills and advancing understanding of this and other marine species has been an ongoing lifetime project. At present, MTI operates a new ten acre mariculture site in Oak Hill, Florida. Starting in 2002 the company consolidated its various operations and interests to this new location. Currently these include live and frozen brine shrimp (Artemia salina), farmed pompano targeted at the live seafood market, and farmed pigfish (Orthopristis chrysoptera) for the live marine baitfish market. In 2003 the authors presented a technical paper at Aquaculture America in Louisville, Kentucky titled “Prospects for Commercial Pompano Mariculture-2003”. An on-line copy of the complete paper can be found at www.PompanoFarms.com. Pompano Farms and Northeast Brine Shrimp are both registered DBA’s of Mariculture Technologies International, Inc.. In addition to those sites, the MTI corporate site is at www.Mariculturetechnology.com. Two major points were made in the WAS-Kentucky paper. First, the technology for the monthly production of pompano eggs, hatchery fry and adult fish is well known and practiced (by MTI). McMaster and Kloth designed and operated a commercial pompano farm in the Dominican Republic as well as a pompano broodstock and hatchery facility in Plantation Key, Florida. The commercial farm was a complete entity with broodstock, hatchery and grow-out (concrete tanks) facilities.