Fostering Technologies for Sustainability: Improving Strategic Niche Management As a Guide for Action Using a Case Study of Wind Power in Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fostering Technologies for Sustainability: Improving Strategic Niche Management As a Guide for Action Using a Case Study of Wind Power in Australia Fostering technologies for sustainability: Improving Strategic Niche Management as a guide for action using a case study of wind power in Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Gerard P. Healey Bachelor of Engineering School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Science, Engineering and Technology Portfolio RMIT University February 2008 i Declaration I, Gerard P Healey, declare that this thesis is my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The research has been undertaken since my commencement in the PhD program in accordance with the relevant ethics procedures and I have not submitted the research for any other academic award. Any editorial work has been duly acknowledged. Gerard P Healey February 2008 ii Acknowledgements There are many people who deserve to share in this PhD, because without them it would not have been possible. First and foremost are my supervisors, Andrea Bunting and John Andrews. Without their patience, constructive comments and ongoing support over the past five years, this thesis would be in far worse shape and I would not be the researcher that I am now. I would like to thank all of those who spoke to me as part of this research at conferences, workshops, and over coffee. In particular I would like to thank those people who generously gave up time for formal interviews – Karl Mallon, Rick Maddox, Grant Flynn, Megan Wheatley, Bruce Cameron, and Sarea Coates – and for informal chats, including Craig Wilson, Peter Cowling, Hugh Outhred, Iain MacGill, Craig Oakeshott, David Mercer, Tim Le Roy, and Tim Farrell. I also must thank those at the Technische Universiteit Eindhoven who gave me much needed guidance and criticism during my visit in 2004, including Rob Raven, Frank Geels, Geert Verbong, Johan Schot, Mattijs Taanman, and Deborah Tappi. I would also like to thank my friends and family who provided much needed distraction from the frustrations of research, particularly Pat, Stef, Benny, Rosalba, Darryl, Derek, Alan and Matt. My mother, Jan Healey, and Aunty, Gill Clarke, deserve particular thanks for proof reading a number of chapters. Finally, but by no means least, I want to thank my partner, Rilla Maxton, whose love and support has kept me sane. iii Publications related to this research Healey, G. and Bunting, A. 2002, 'Overcoming barriers to wind power diffusion: The Method of Strategic Niche Management', Proceedings of Solar Harvest, The Australia & New Zealand Solar Energy Society, Newcastle, Australia, pp.8. Healey, G. 2003, 'An Introduction to the greenhouse gas benefits of wind power in the National Electricity Market', Proceedings of Destination Renewables, The Australia & New Zealand Solar Energy Society, Melbourne, Australia, pp.276 - 286. Healey, G. 2004, 'Fostering Technologies for Sustainability: Learning from the Case of Wind Power in Australia', Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2, 2, 1 - 17. Bunting, A. and Healey, G. 2005, 'Australian’s Mandatory Renewable Energy Target: Driver of Institutional Change?' paper presented to World Renewable Energy Congress, Aberdeen, May 22 - 27 Healey, G. and Bunting, A., 2008, Wind Power in Australia: Overcoming Technological and Institutional Barriers, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28, 2, 115 - 127. iv Abbreviations AAC Australian Aluminium Council ACCC Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ACNT Australian Council of National Trusts AEA Australian EcoGeneration Association AGO Australian Greenhouse Office AIGN Australian Industry Greenhouse Network APIC Australian Paper Industry Council ASX Australian Stock Exchange AusWEA Australian Wind Energy Association BCSE Business Council for Sustainable Energy CoAG Council of Australian Governments CRA Charles Rivers Associates DITR Department of Industry, Tourism and Resources (Federal) DOI Department of Infrastructure (Victoria) DSE Department of Sustainability and Environment (Victoria) EEC Energy Equity Corporation EIMWG Energy Intensive Manufacturing Working Group ERAA Energy Retailers Association of Australia ERD Environment, Resources and Development Committee (South Australia) ESCOSA Essential Services Commission of South Australia ESIPC Electricity Supply Industry Planning Council (South Australia) FCAS Frequency Control Ancillary Services IEA International Energy Agency LETAG Low Emissions Technical Advisory Group MCE Ministerial Council on Energy MLM Multi-Level Model v MMA Mclennan Magasanik Associates MRET Mandatory Renewable Energy Target NECA National Electricity Code Administrator NEMMCO National Electricity Market Management Company NGF National Generators Forum NRET New South Wales Renewable Energy Target NSW New South Wales OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ORER Office of the Renewable Energy Regulator PCG Prom Coast Guardians PWEP Portland Wind Energy Project RTWG Renewables Target Working Group SA South Australia SEAV Sustainable Energy Authority Victoria SEDA Sustainable Energy Development Authority (NSW) SEIAA Sustainable Energy Industries Association of Australia SNM Strategic Niche Management TVCG Tarwin Valley Coastal Guardians VCAT Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal VRET Victorian Renewable Energy Target WEPWG Wind Energy Policy Working Group WETAG Wind Energy Technical Advisory Group vi Table of Contents Abstract.............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Context and research aim.................................................................................... 4 1.1 Research design.................................................................................................. 6 1.1.1 Research questions and thesis aim.........................................................6 1.1.2 Principles for case study research..........................................................7 1.1.3 Empirical research strategy....................................................................9 1.2 SNM: Fostering socio-technical change ........................................................... 11 1.2.1 Background..........................................................................................11 1.2.2 Conceptual framework.........................................................................12 1.2.3 Guide for experimenting with new technology ...................................16 1.2.4 Strengths of SNM................................................................................18 1.2.5 Weaknesses in SNM as a guide for action...........................................19 1.3 An opportunity for learning: Wind power in Australia 1997 – 2007 ............... 22 1.4 Thesis structure................................................................................................. 27 2 Understanding socio-technical change.................................................................. 29 2.0 Introduction....................................................................................................... 29 2.1 Momentum in socio-technical regimes............................................................. 29 2.1.1 Stability................................................................................................30 2.1.2 Momentum...........................................................................................31 2.1.3 Lock-in.................................................................................................34 2.1.4 Discussion and summary .....................................................................37 2.2 Pressure for change........................................................................................... 37 2.2.1 Disrupting socio-technical regimes......................................................38 2.2.2 Responding to disruption .....................................................................38 2.2.3 Discussion and Summary.....................................................................41 2.3 Socio-technical transitions................................................................................ 42 2.3.1 A conceptual model of socio-technical transitions ..............................42 2.3.2 Development paths for new technology ..............................................44 2.3.3 Discussion and summary .....................................................................45 2.4 Actors in niche development ............................................................................ 46 vii 2.4.1 The role of actors .................................................................................46 2.4.2 Consensus and disagreement ...............................................................52 2.4.3 Discussion and Summary.....................................................................59 2.5 Understanding positive feedbacks .................................................................... 59 2.6 Stimulating positive feedbacks......................................................................... 67 2.7 Challenges to stimulating positive feedbacks................................................... 70 2.8 Conclusions....................................................................................................... 80 3 Industry development............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Draft Determination and the More Preferable Draft Rule by 24 October 2019
    Australian Energy Market Commission DRAFT RULE DETERMINATION RULE NATIONAL GAS AMENDMENT (DWGM IMPROVEMENT TO AMDQ REGIME) RULE 2019 PROPONENT Victorian Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change 05 SEPTEMBER 2019 Australian Energy Draft rule determination Market Commission Improvement to AMDQ regime 05 September 2019 INQUIRIES Australian Energy Market Commission PO Box A2449 Sydney South NSW 1235 E [email protected] T (02) 8296 7800 F (02) 8296 7899 Reference: GRC0051 CITATION AEMC, DWGM Improvement to AMDQ regime, Draft rule determination, 05 September 2019 ABOUT THE AEMC The AEMC reports to the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) through the COAG Energy Council. We have two functions. We make and amend the national electricity, gas and energy retail rules and conduct independent reviews for the COAG Energy Council. This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism and review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. Australian Energy Draft rule determination Market Commission Improvement to AMDQ regime 05 September 2019 SUMMARY 1 The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC or Commission) has made a more preferable draft rule that amends the National Gas Rules to replace the current authorised maximum daily quantity (AMDQ) regime in the Victorian declared wholesale gas market (DWGM) with a new entry and exit capacity certificates regime. These certificates can be purchased by market participants at a primary auction run by AEMO to gain the benefits of injection and withdrawal tie-breaking, congestion uplift protection and some limited curtailment protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    The Senate Select Committee on Wind Turbines Final report August 2015 Commonwealth of Australia 2015 ISBN 978-1-76010-260-9 Secretariat Ms Jeanette Radcliffe (Committee Secretary) Ms Jackie Morris (Acting Secretary) Dr Richard Grant (Principal Research Officer) Ms Kate Gauthier (Principal Research Officer) Ms Trish Carling (Senior Research Officer) Mr Tasman Larnach (Senior Research Officer) Dr Joshua Forkert (Senior Research Officer) Ms Carol Stewart (Administrative Officer) Ms Kimberley Balaga (Administrative Officer) Ms Sarah Batts (Administrative Officer) PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3241 Fax: 02 6277 5829 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/select_windturbines This document was produced by the Senate Select Wind Turbines Committee Secretariat and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/ ii MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE 44th Parliament Members Senator John Madigan, Chair Victoria, IND Senator Bob Day AO, Deputy Chair South Australia, FFP Senator Chris Back Western Australia, LP Senator Matthew Canavan Queensland, NATS Senator David Leyonhjelm New South Wales, LDP Senator Anne Urquhart Tasmania, ALP Substitute members Senator Gavin Marshall Victoria, ALP for Senator Anne Urquhart (from 18 May to 18 May 2015) Participating members for this inquiry Senator Nick Xenophon South Australia, IND Senator the Hon Doug Cameron New South Wales, ALP iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Membership of the Committee ........................................................................ iii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Annual Planning Report 2020 – 2024
    Distribution Annual Planning Report 2020 – 2024 Issue number 7 Status Approved Approver Tom Langstaff Date of approval 20 December 2019 AusNet Services Distribution Annual Planning Report 2020 - 2024 ISSUE/AMENDMENT STATUS Issue Date Description Author Approved by Number 1 20/12/2013 2014-2018 Issue (First Issue) M Wickramasuriya D Postlethwaite S Lees M Cavanagh 2 19/12/2014 2015-2019 Issue S Lees J Bridge M Cavanagh 3 24/12/2015 2016-2020 Issue M Wickramasuriya J Bridge S Lees M Cavanagh 4 23/12/2016 2017-2021 Issue M Wickramasuriya J Bridge S Sao M Cavanagh 5 22/12/2017 2018-2022 Issue M Wickramasuriya J Bridge T Langstaff 6 27/12/2018 2019-2023 Issue M Wickramasuriya T Langstaff J Pollock 6.1 30/04/2019 Revision to 2019-2023 Issue to include M Wickramasuriya T Langstaff geographic areas subject to a REFCL J Pollock condition, as per Electricity Distribution S Sao Code V.9A (amended August 2018). 7 20/12/2019 2020-2024 Issue J Pollock T Langstaff A Erceg S Sao Disclaimer This document belongs to AusNet Services and may or may not contain all available information on the subject matter this document purports to address. The information contained in this document is subject to review and AusNet Services may amend this document at any time. Amendments will be indicated in the Amendment Table, but AusNet Services does not undertake to keep this document up to date. To the maximum extent permitted by law, AusNet Services makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information contained in this document, or its suitability for any intended purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Wind Report Annual Market Update 2012 T Able of Contents
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2012 T able of contents Local Content Requirements: Cost competitiveness vs. ‘green growth’? . 4 The Global Status of Wind Power in 2012 . 8 Market Forecast for 2013-2017 . 18 Australia . .24 Brazil . .26 Canada. .28 PR China . .30 Denmark . .34 European Union . .36 Germany. .38 Global offshore . .40 India . .44 Japan . .46 Mexico . .48 Pakistan . 50 Romania . 52 South Africa . 54 South Korea . 56 Sweden . .58 Turkey . 60 Ukraine . .62 United Kingdom. .64 United States . 66 About GWEC . 70 GWEC – Global Wind 2012 Report FOREWORD 2012 was full of surprises for the global wind industry. Most As the market broadens, however, we face new challenges, surprising, of course, was the astonishing 8.4 GW installed in or rather old challenges, but in new markets. Our special the United States during the fourth quarter, as well as the fact focus chapter looks at the impact of increasing local content that the US eked out China to regain the top spot among global requirements and trade restrictions in some of the most markets for the first time since 2009. This, in combination with promising new markets, and the consequences of that a very strong year in Europe, meant that the annual market trend for an industry which is still grappling with significant grew by about 10% to just under 45 GW, and the cumulative overcapacity and the downward pressure on turbine prices market growth of almost 19% means we ended 2012 with that result. 282.5 GW of wind power globally. For the first time in three years, the majority of installations were inside the OECD.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendee Conference Pack
    Wind Energy Conference 2021 Rising to the Challenge 12 May 2021, InterContinental Hotel, Wellington, New Zealand Programme Joseph, aged 9 We would like to thank our sponsors for their support 2021 Wind Energy Conference – 12th May 2021 Wind Energy Conference Programme 12 May 2021 InterContinental, Wellington Rising to the Challenge Welcome and Minister’s The energy sector and renewables Presentation ▪ Hon Dr Megan Woods, Minister of Energy and Resources 8.30 – 9.00 Session 1 Facilitator: Dr Christina Hood, Compass Climate Decarbonising the New Zealand’s journey to net zero carbon energy sector ▪ Hon James Shaw, Minister of Climate Change 9.00 to 10.45 Infrastructure implications of decarbonisation ▪ Ross Copland, New Zealand Infrastructure Commission The industrial heat opportunity ▪ Linda Mulvihill, Fonterra Panel and Audience Discussion – testing our key opportunities and level of ambition ▪ Ross Copland, New Zealand Infrastructure Commission ▪ Linda Mulvihill, Fonterra ▪ Briony Bennett (she/her), Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment ▪ Matt Burgess, The New Zealand Initiative ▪ Liz Yeaman, Retyna Ltd Morning Tea Sponsored by Ara Ake 10.45 to 11.15 Session 2 Waipipi, Delivering a wind farm during a global pandemic Jim Pearson, Tilt Renewables Building new wind Australian renewables and wind development update 11.15 -1.00 ▪ Kane Thornton, Clean Energy Council DNV’s Energy Transition Outlook what it means for wind energy ▪ Graham Slack, DNV A changing regulatory landscape and implications for wind and other renewables ▪ Amelia
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Law in Responding to Climate Change: Emerging Regulatory, Liability and Market Approaches
    THE ROLE OF LAW IN RESPONDING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: EMERGING REGULATORY, LIABILITY AND MARKET APPROACHES NICOLA ANNA MAY DURRANT BSc (Env)/LLB (Hons)(GU); Grad DipLP (ANU) Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law/Institute for Sustainable Resources Queensland University of Technology Brisbane 2008 1 KEYWORDS Climate Change, Climate Law, Climate Liabilities, Carbon Trading, Environmental Governance, Environmental Law, Environmental Policy, International Law. 2 ABSTRACT Climate change presents as the archetypal environmental problem with short-term economic self-interest operating to the detriment of the long-term sustainability of our society. The scientific reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change strongly assert that the stabilisation of emissions in the atmosphere, to avoid the adverse impacts of climate change, requires significant and rapid reductions in ‘business as usual’ global greenhouse gas emissions. The sheer magnitude of emissions reductions required, within this urgent timeframe, will necessitate an unprecedented level of international, multi-national and intra-national cooperation and will challenge conventional approaches to the creation and implementation of international and domestic legal regimes. To meet this challenge, existing international, national and local legal systems must harmoniously implement a strong international climate change regime through a portfolio of traditional and innovative legal mechanisms that swiftly transform current behavioural practices in emitting greenhouse gases. These include the imposition of strict duties to reduce emissions through the establishment of strong command and control regulation (the regulatory approach); mechanisms for the creation and distribution of liabilities for greenhouse gas emissions and climate- related harm (the liability approach) and the use of innovative regulatory tools in the form of the carbon trading scheme (the market approach).
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Power: a Study of Public Engagement in Uddevalla, Sweden
    Planning for Wind Power: A Study of Public Engagement in Uddevalla, Sweden by Michael Friesen A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba In partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF CITY PLANNING Faculty of Architecture, Department of City Planning Winnipeg, MB Copyright © 2014 by Mike Friesen Abstract Despite seemingly widespread support, wind power initiatives often experience controversial development processes that may result in project delays or cancelations. Wind power planning – often derided for ignoring the concerns of local residents – is ideally positioned to engage citizens in determining if and where development may be appropriate. Following the process of a dialogue based landscape analysis in Uddevalla, Sweden, the research endeavours to better understand the ties between landscape and attitudes towards wind power, how concerned parties express these attitudes, and how these attitudes may change through public engagement. In contrast to many existing quantitative studies, the research uses one-on-one interviews with participants of the planning processes to provide a rich qualitative resource for the exploration of the topic. Five themes emerging from the interviews and their analysis, are explored in depth. These themes include: landscape form and function; the expression of public attitudes; changing attitudes; frustration with politicians and processes; and engagement and representation. Consideration is also given to landscape analysis as a method, wind
    [Show full text]
  • Australian National Electricity Market Model - Version 1.10 EEMG Working Paper 2-2015 - Version 20
    Australian National Electricity Market Model - version 1.10 EEMG Working Paper 2-2015 - version 20 Prepared by: Phillip Wild William Paul Bell John Foster Michael Hewson The University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia Prepared for: Australian Research Council AGL Clean Energy Council Hydro Tasmania Infigen Energy Australia Vestas University of Newcastle As part of the project: ARC Linkage Project (LP110200957, 2011-2014) - An investigation of the impacts of increased power supply to the national grid by wind generators on the Australian electricity industry: Australian National Electricity Market Model – version 1.10 Authors Dr Phillip Wild, [email protected], +61 7 3346 1004 Dr William Paul Bell, [email protected], +61 7 3346 6637 Professor John Foster, [email protected], +61 7 3365 6780 Dr Michael Hewson, [email protected], +61 7 3346 7023 Energy Economics and Management Group Postal address: School of Economics The University of Queensland St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia Fax: +61 7 3365 7299 Website: http://www.uq.edu.au/eemg/ Please cite this report as Wild, P, Bell, WP, Foster, J, Hewson, M 2015, Australian National Electricity Market Model - version 1.10, Energy Economics and Management Group Working Paper 2-2015, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Working paper version 20 – 11 January 2016 Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. page 2 Australian National Electricity Market Model – version 1.10 Preface This working paper provides details of Australian National Electricity Market (ANEM) model version 1.10 for the research project titled: An investigation of the impacts of increased power supply to the national grid by wind generators on the Australian electricity industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability Impacts of Increased Wind Generation in the Australian National Electricity Grid
    Reliability Impacts of Increased Wind Generation in the Australian National Electricity Grid Mehdi Mosadeghy B.Sc., M.Sc. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering Abstract Wind power penetration has been consistently growing and it has been rapidly becoming a significant generation technology in many countries. However, the intermittent and variable nature of wind energy is a major barrier in wind power commitment. Wind speed fluctuations and unpredictability can affect the operation and reliability of power systems. Therefore, the impact of integrating large volume of wind generators on the system reliability needs to be carefully investigated and the reliability contributions of wind farms require to be evaluated for better integration of wind energy sources. Because of intermittency and variability of wind energy, conventional reliability evaluation methods are not applicable and different techniques have been developed to model wind generators. However, most of these methods are time-consuming or may not be able to capture time dependency and correlations between renewable resources and load. Therefore, this research intends to improve the existing reliability methods and proposes a faster and simpler approach. In this approach, wind power and electricity demand are being modelled as time-dependent clusters, which not only can capture their time-dependent attributes, but also is able to keep the correlations between the data sets. To illustrate the effectiveness of this framework, the proposed methodology has been applied to the IEEE reliability test system. In addition, the developed technique is validated by comparing results with the sequential Monte Carlo technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas HUB Participant ID Table
    HUB ID Table Registered Participant Retail Market Participant Type HUB ID AEMO Company ID 1st Energy Pty Ltd VICGAS Retailer FIRSTNGY 298 ACTEWAGL Distribution NSWACTGAS Network Operator ACTEWNWO 161 ACTEWAGL Retail NSWACTGAS Retailer ACTEWUSR 140 ADCHEM (Australia) Pty Ltd SAGAS Self Contracting User ADCHEM 312 AEMO MIBB interface for CSV and aseXML NSWACTGAS Market Operator AEMOMIBB N/A AGL Energy Sales and Marketing Limited NSWACTGAS Retailer AGLUSR 45 AGL Sales (Queensland) Pty Limited QLDGAS Retailer AGLQLD 42 AGL Sales Pty Limited SAGAS Retailer AGL 4 AGL Sales Pty Limited QLDGAS, VICGAS Retailer PULSE 4 AGL Sales Pty Limited WA Retailer PULSE WA Participant AGL Sales Pty Limited QLDGAS, VICGAS Retailer AUSPWRGAS - Deregistered 80 Agora Retail WA Retailer AGR WA Participant Agora Retail Pty Ltd VICGAS Retailer AGORA 270 Alinta Energy Retail Sales Pty Ltd QLDGAS, SAGAS, VICGAS Retailer ALNTARES 192 Alinta Energy Retail Sales Pty Ltd NSWACTGAS Retailer ALINTAUSR 192 Alinta Sales Pty Ltd WA Retailer ALS WA Participant Allgas Energy Pty Ltd QLDGAS Distributor APTALLGAS 82 Amanda Energy Pty Ltd WA Retailer AMDENGY WA Participant APA Gasnet Australia (Operations) P/L VICGAS Pipeline Operator GASNET 14 APR Parmelia WA Pipeline Operator CMSR WA Participant Aurora Energy Pty Ltd VICGAS Retailer AURORA - Deregistered 159 Ausnet Services Pty Ltd VICGAS Distributor TXUN 11 Australian Energy Market Operator NSWACTGAS Market Operator NAGMO N/A Australian Energy Market Operator SAGAS Market Operator REMCo N/A Australian Energy Market Operator
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Assessment of the Impact of Wind Farms on Surrounding Land Values in Australia, NSW Valuer
    PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA NSW DEPARTMENT OF LANDS PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA Prepared for: NSW Valuer General August 2009 RESEARCH REPORT 1 PRP REF: M.6777 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA NSW DEPARTMENT OF LANDS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _____________________________________________________________ 2 1. INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________________ 3 2. CONTEXT ___________________________________________________________________ 4 3. LITERATURE REVIEW _________________________________________________________ 5 4. METHODOLOGY _____________________________________________________________ 12 5. RESULTS ___________________________________________________________________ 16 6. DISCUSSION ________________________________________________________________ 54 7. REFERENCES _______________________________________________________________ 56 RESEARCH REPORT 1 PRP REF: M.6777 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF WIND FARMS ON SURROUNDING LAND VALUES IN AUSTRALIA NSW DEPARTMENT OF LANDS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of this study was to conduct a preliminary assessment on the impacts of wind farms on surrounding land values in Australia, mainly through the analysis of property sales transaction data. This included consideration of the contribution of various factors (including distance to a wind farm, view of a wind farm, and land use) to
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Annual Planning Report 2019 – 2023
    Distribution Annual Planning Report 2019 – 2023 Issue number 6.1 Status Approved Approver Tom Langstaff Date of approval 30 April 2019 AusNet Services Distribution Annual Planning Report 2019 – 2023 ISSUE/AMENDMENT STATUS Issue Date Description Author Approved by Number 1 20/12/2013 2014-2018 Issue (First Issue) M Wickramasuriya D Postlethwaite S Lees M Cavanagh 2 19/12/2014 2015-2019 Issue S Lees J Bridge M Cavanagh 3 24/12/2015 2016-2020 Issue M Wickramasuriya J Bridge S Lees M Cavanagh 4 23/12/2016 2017-2021 Issue M Wickramasuriya J Bridge S Sao M Cavanagh 5 22/12/2017 2018-2022 Issue M Wickramasuriya J Bridge T Langstaff 6 27/12/2018 2019-2023 Issue M Wickramasuriya T Langstaff J Pollock 6.1 30/04/2019 Revision to 2019-2023 Issue to include M Wickramasuriya T Langstaff geographic areas subject to a REFCL J Pollock condition, as per Electricity Distribution Code V.9A (amended August 2018). S Sao Disclaimer This document belongs to AusNet Services and may or may not contain all available information on the subject matter this document purports to address. The information contained in this document is subject to review and AusNet Services may amend this document at any time. Amendments will be indicated in the Amendment Table, but AusNet Services does not undertake to keep this document up to date. To the maximum extent permitted by law, AusNet Services makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information contained in this document, or its suitability for any intended purpose.
    [Show full text]