DOCSLIB.ORG

From Qumran to Aleppo: a Discussion with Emanuel Tov About The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments Herausgegeben von Jan Christian Gertz, Dietrich-Alex Koch, Matthias Köckert, Hermut Lohr, Steven McKenzie, Joachim Schaper und Christopher Tuckett Band 230 From Qumran to Aleppo A Discussion with Emanuel Τον about the Textual History of Jewish Scriptures in Honor of his 65th Birthday Herausgegeben von Armin Lange, Matthias Weigold und Jozsef Zsengellér Mit 13 Tabellen und einer Grafik Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. ISBN 978-3-525-53094-8 © 2009. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen Fällen bedarf der vorherigen schriftlichen Einwilligung des Verlages. Hinweis zu § 52a UrhG: Weder das Werk noch seine Teile dürfen ohne vorherige schriftliche Einwilligung des Verlages öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden. Dies gilt auch bei einer entsprechenden Nutzung für Lehr- und Unterrichtszwecke. Printed in Germany. Druck und Bindung: ® Hubert & Co, Göttingen Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Table of Contents Preface 7 EMANUEL Τον The Many Forms of Hebrew Scripture: Reflections in Light of the LXX and 4QReworked Pentateuch 11 ARMIN LANGE "They Confirmed the Reading" (y. Ta 'an. 4.68a): The Textual Standardization of Jewish Scriptures in the Second Temple Period 29 JOSEF M. OESCH Formale und materiale Gliederungshermeneutik der Pentateuch-Handschriften von Qumran 81 FRIEDRICH V. REITERER Die Differenz zwischen Urtext und Ausgangstext: Beispiele zur Entwicklung der sirazidischen Versionen 123 HERMANN-JOSEF STIPP Der prämasoretische Idiolekt des Buches Ezechiel und seine Beziehungen zum Jeremiabuch 141 HANNA TERVANOTKO "The Hope of the Enemy Has Perished": The Figure of Miriam in the Qumran Library 156 KEVIN TROMPELT Die masoretische Akzentuation als Spiegel abweichender Texttraditionen 176 JOZSEF ZSENGELLÉR Origin or Originality of the Torah? The Historical and Textcritical Value of the Samaritan Pentateuch 189 Preface When Emanuel Τον visited Vienna in 2006 he celebrated his 65l birthday. On this occasion the Institute of Jewish Studies at the University of Vienna organized a small symposium to which Emanuel contributed as well: "Von Qumran bis Aleppo: Texte und Textgeschichten jüdischer Schriften: Ein internationales Symposium zum 65. Geburtstag von Emanuel Τον." The present volume publishes the presentations of the 2006 Vienna meeting. But it should not be regarded as another proceedings volume of a meeting on the textual history of the Hebrew Bible nor does it want to be a Festschrift in honor of Emanuel Τον. Emanuel received an exceptional and monumen­ tal Festschrift in 2003.1 Instead of redoing such a Festschrift on a smaller scale the organizers of the Vienna meeting and the editors of the present collection decided to go another way. The contributions of the present vol­ ume engage with and discuss various aspects of Emanuel Tov's work on the textual history of the Hebrew Bible. This discussion marks the extraordi­ nary achievements of Emanuel's work and its importance for the under­ standing of the textual history of the Hebrew Bible. It is in the spirit of such a discussion that Emanuel Τον has contributed an article to our collection as well. In his own contribution, "The Many Forms of Hebrew Scripture: Reflec­ tions in Light of the Septuagint and 4QReworked Pentateuch," Emanuel Τον studies the character of some non-Masoretic textual traditions of the Jewish scriptures. He focuses on textual witnesses which attest to a rewrit­ ten text, i.e. the Septuagint books of 3 Kingdoms, Esther, and Daniel as well as the Samaritan Pentateuch and the so-called Reworked Pentateuch manuscripts from Qumran. Emanuel concludes: "What 4QRP, the Hebrew source of some LXX books, and the SP group have in common is the inter­ action of stretches of Scripture text and exegetical expansions, although these expansions differ in nature and tendency. If all these texts were consi­ dered authoritative, probably 4QRP enjoyed a similar status. All these texts need to be studied as Hebrew Scripture."2 Armin Lange engages with a question that Emanuel often hints to in his work but has treated only once in a full-length study, i.e. the question of the Emanuel: Studies in the Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Ema­ nuel Τον (ed. S. Paul, R. A. Kraft, L. H. Schiffman, and W. W. Fields; VTSup 94; Leiden: Brill, 2003). 2 P. 28 in the present volume. textual standardization of the Hebrew Bible.3 Lange shows that efforts towards a textual standardization of the books collected in the Hebrew Bible respond to the standardized texts of the Graeco-Roman classics in the Hellenistic world. These efforts towards textual standardization of various Jewish scriptures began somewhat earlier in Egyptian Judaism than in Ju- dah itself. After the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 70 CE, Judaism had a standard text at hand which allowed for the exegetical work of the Rabbis and developed into the Masoretic Text of the Middle Ages. Josef M. Oesch focuses on one aspect of Emanuel's work on the scribal practices of ancient Judaism, i.e. the textgraphical structures of manuscripts of Jewish scriptures. He compares the textgraphical structures of the Penta­ teuch manuscripts among the Dead Sea Scrolls with the list of Petuchot and Setumot by Maimonides, the Codex Leningradiensis, the Samaritan Penta­ teuch and the LXX codices Alexandrinus and Vaticanus. Both the Samari­ tan and the Masoretic textgraphical systems of structuring texts have pre­ cursors among the Dead Sea Scrolls. But next to textgraphical agreements between medieval MT and SP manuscripts on the one hand and the Dead Sea Scrolls on the other hand significant textgraphical variation can be found. Similar observations can be made for the Greek codices. Friedrich V. Reiterer develops a methodology for the identification of the Urtext of the book of Ecclesiasticus. Réitérer emphasizes that the rule of lectio difficilior should be neglected. More important are agreements be­ tween several Hebrew and non-Hebrew witnesses as well as grammatical and stylistic observations. His study further shows that several variants of the text of Ecclesiasticus go back to its original author. It seems as if Ben Sira himself produced more than one text of his book. Hermann-Josef Stipp compares the premasoretic revisions of the books of Jeremiah and Ezekiel with each other. His study shows that both revi­ sions employ different approaches to their Vorlagen. The ideolectic rhetoric of the two revisions does not overlap. In the pre-Masoretic revision of Eze­ kiel, idiolectic language is often concentrated in short text passages while it is widespread in the pre-Masoretic Jeremiah revision. Futhermore, the pre- Masoretic revision of Ezekiel attests to signficantly smaller extensions than the one of Jeremiah. Stipp's result questions recent ideas about a shared redaction history of the Hebrew Bible's later prophets. The contribution of Hanna Tervanotko deals with a special aspect of an important text from Qumran which was published by Emanuel. She reads 3 Ε. Τον, "The History and Significance of a Standard Text of the Hebrew Bible," in Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation, vol. 1: From the Beginnings to the Middle Ages (Until 1300)· part 1: Antiquity (ed. M. Saebo; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996), 48-66. the extended song of Miriam in 4Q365 6a II + 6c, 1-7 in the context of the ancient Jewish reception history of the figure of Miriam. These seven lines indicate that the figure of Miriam was considered as an appropriate charac­ ter to deliver its expanded theological message. The Song of Miriam pre­ served in 4Q365 is not a simple remake of the Song of Moses in Exod 15:1-19 but draws on other Miriam traditions as well. It portrays Miriam as a more autonomous figure, who does not simply repeat the Song of Moses. Emanuel's great interest in the Masoretic text is reflected in the contribu­ tion of Kevin Trompelt. He asks for the textcritical significance of Masoret­ ic vocalizations and accentuations in the Book of Isaiah. Differences be­ tween the Masoretic vocalizations and accentuations of Isa 10:1 and 29:3 point to different medieval textual traditions. The article of Jozsef Zsengellér responds to Emanuel's interest in the Samaritan Penteteuch. Zsengellér underlines the historical and textcritical value of the Samaritan Pentateuch and argues for the need of a new critical edition of this important textual witness of the Pentateuch. Unless otherwise indicated, abbreviations follow The SBL Handbook of Style: For Ancient Near Eastern, Biblical, and Early Christian Studies (ed. P. H. Alexander et al.; Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1999). At the end of this preface it is a pleasant obligation to us to express our gratitude to those who made the 2006 Vienna meeting and the publication of its contributions possible. We are indebted to the University of Vienna which provided funding for the 2006 meeting. The symposium itself would not have been possible without the support of Ms. Dara Fischer, the secre­ tary of the Vienna Institute of Jewish Studies, who supported us during our meeting. We are also obliged to Mr. Jörg Persch and Ms. Tina Grummel of the publishing house Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht and the editors of For­ schungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments for publishing our volume. Vienna and Budapest, March 2009 Armin Lange Matthias Weigold Jozsef Zsengellér Emanuel Τον (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem) The Many Forms of Hebrew Scripture Reflections in Light of the LXX and 4QReworked Pentateuch 1. Background In modern society, the Bible has many faces both in Hebrew and in transla­ tion, but they all present more or less the same content.
Recommended publications
  • Frank Moore Cross's Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls

    Frank Moore Cross's Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Classics and Religious Studies Department 2014 Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls" (2014). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 127. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/127 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Frank Moore Cross’s Contribution to the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford This paper examines the impact of Frank Moore Cross on the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Since Cross was a member of the original editorial team responsible for publishing the Cave 4 materials, his influence on the field was vast. The article is limited to those areas of Scrolls study not covered in other articles; the reader is referred especially to the articles on palaeography and textual criticism for further discussion of Cross’s work on the Scrolls. t is difficult to overestimate the impact the discovery They icturedp two columns of a manuscript, columns of of the Dead Sea Scrolls had on the life and career of the Book of Isaiah .
  • Qumran Caves” in the Iron Age in the Light of the Pottery Evidence

    Qumran Caves” in the Iron Age in the Light of the Pottery Evidence

    CHAPTER 17 History of the “Qumran Caves” in the Iron Age in the Light of the Pottery Evidence Mariusz Burdajewicz Since the late ‘40s and the beginning of the ‘50s of the last Jerusalem carried out a survey of about 270 sites situated century, the north-eastern part of the Judean Desert has to the north and south of the Qumran site.4 Of the 40 sites been witnessing numerous archaeological surveys and (almost exclusively caves or cavities), where the traces of works (Table 17.1; Fig. 17.1). The main, but not the only one, human presence from various periods were found, only goal of various expeditions sent to the Dead Sea region, few of them yielded the finds pertaining to the Iron Age. was the quest for more and more scrolls. On this occasion, One large bowl and one lamp came from caves GQ 27 and apart from manuscripts, many other artefacts, like pottery GQ 39 respectively.5 Fragments of two vessels dated to the and the so-called small finds,1 have come to light. Their Iron Age II are mentioned as coming from cave GQ 13, and chronology range in date from the Chalcolithic to the a few pottery sherds, possibly dated to the same period, Arab periods. from cave GQ 6.6 The survey was completed in 1956, and The aim of this short paper is to present, on the basis of some additional pottery fragments from the Iron Age pottery evidence, some observations concerning the use were found in cave 11Q (fragments of jars, two lamps and of the caves during the Iron Age II–III.
  • Deuteronomy in the Temple Scroll and Its Use in the Textual Criticism of Deuteronomy*

    Deuteronomy in the Temple Scroll and Its Use in the Textual Criticism of Deuteronomy*

    Please provide footnote text chapter 17 Deuteronomy in the Temple Scroll and Its Use in the Textual Criticism of Deuteronomy* Sidnie White Crawford The Temple Scroll has been studied from many different angles since its initial publication by Yigael Yadin in 1977.1 A quick perusal of its bibliography yields articles on the laws of the Temple Scroll, its theology, the architecture of its Temple plan, its relationship to Jubilees, MMT and the Damascus Document, and its method in the reuse of scripture, to cite just a few examples.2 There have not, however, been many studies of the Temple Scroll from a text-critical point of view.3 In this article I will explore the question of whether or not the text of the Temple Scroll can be useful when pursuing the textual criticism of the book of Deuteronomy.4 In other words, I will not be investigating how the Temple Scroll uses Deuteronomy for its own purposes, but whether or not the Temple Scroll can be used as evidence in recovering the “earliest inferable * It gives me great pleasure to dedicate this article to Moshe Bernstein, longtime colleague and friend in all things Qumran. 1 Yigael Yadin, Megillat ha-Mikdash (3 vols.; Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1977) [Hebrew]; The Temple Scroll (3 vols. and supplement; rev. Eng. ed.; Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1983). 2 See, e.g., the voluminous bibliography in Lawrence H. Schiffman, The Courtyards of the House of the Lord: Studies on the Temple Scroll (STDJ 75; Leiden: Brill, 2008). 3 The most thorough treatment is still the early study of Emanuel Tov, “The ‘Temple Scroll’ and Old Testament Textual Criticism,” in Eretz Israel, Harry M.
  • Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access

    Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: a Question of Access

    690 American Archivist / Vol. 56 / Fall 1993 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/56/4/690/2748590/aarc_56_4_w213201818211541.pdf by guest on 30 September 2021 Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Question of Access SARA S. HODSON Abstract: The announcement by the Huntington Library in September 1991 of its decision to open for unrestricted research its photographs of the Dead Sea Scrolls touched off a battle of wills between the library and the official team of scrolls editors, as well as a blitz of media publicity. The action was based on a commitment to the principle of intellectual freedom, but it must also be considered in light of the ethics of donor agreements and of access restrictions. The author relates the story of the events leading to the Huntington's move and its aftermath, and she analyzes the issues involved. About the author: Sara S. Hodson is curator of literary manuscripts at the Huntington Library. Her articles have appeared in Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship, Dictionary of Literary Biography Yearbook, and the Huntington Library Quarterly. This article is revised from a paper delivered before the Manuscripts Repositories Section meeting of the 1992 Society of American Archivists conference in Montreal. The author wishes to thank William A. Moffett for his encour- agement and his thoughtful and invaluable review of this article in its several revisions. Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls 691 ON 22 SEPTEMBER 1991, THE HUNTINGTON scrolls for historical scholarship lies in their LIBRARY set off a media bomb of cata- status as sources contemporary with the time clysmic proportions when it announced that they illuminate.
  • Bible from Qumran Sidnie White Crawford

    Bible from Qumran Sidnie White Crawford

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sidnie White Crawford Publications Classics and Religious Studies 2014 The O" ther" Bible from Qumran Sidnie White Crawford Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crawfordpubs This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sidnie White Crawford Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The "Other" Bible from Qumran by Sidnie White Crawford Where did the Bible come from? The Hebrew Bible, or Christian Old Testament, did not exist in the canonical form we know prior to the early second century C.E. Before that, certain books had become authoritative in the Jewish community, but the status of other books, which eventually did become part of the Hebrew Bible, was questionable. All Jews everywhere, since at least the fourth century B.C.E., accepted the authority of the Torah of Moses, the first five books of the Bible (also called the Pentateuch): Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Most Jews also accepted the books of the Prophets, including the Former Prophets or historical books (Joshua through Kings), as authoritative. The Samaritan community only accepted the Pentateuch as authoritative, and the Pentateuch remains their Bible today. Some parts of the Jewish community accepted the books found in the Writings as authoritative, but not all Jews accepted all of those books. The Jewish community that lived at Qumran and stored their manuscripts in the nearby caves, for example, do not seem to have accepted Esther as authoritative.
  • Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places

    Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places

    Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society 2007 Volume 25 Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places STEPHEN PFANN In December 1952, five years after the discovery of Qumran cave 1, Roland de Vaux connected its manuscript remains to the nearby site of Khirbet Qumran when he found one of the unique cylindrical jars, typical of cave 1Q, embedded in the floor of the site. The power of this suggestion was such that, from that point on, as each successive Judean Desert cave containing first-century scrolls was discovered, they, too, were assumed to have originated from the site of Qumran. Even the scrolls discovered at Masada were thought to have arrived there by the hands of Essene refugees. Other researchers have since proposed that certain teachings within the scrolls of Qumran’s caves provide evidence for a sect that does not match that of the Essenes described by first-century writers such as Josephus, Philo and Pliny. These researchers prefer to call this group ‘the Qumran Community’, ‘the Covenanters’, ‘the Yahad ’ or simply ‘sectarians’. The problem is that no single title sufficiently covers the doctrines presented in the scrolls, primarily since there is a clear diversity in doctrine among these scrolls.1 In this article, I would like to present a challenge to this monolithic approach to the understanding of the caves and their scroll collections. This reassessment will be based on a close examination of the material culture of the caves (including ceramics and fabrics) and the palaeographic dating of the scroll collections in individual caves.
  • A Study of Paul's Interpretation of the Old Testament with Particular Reference to His Use of Isaiah in the Letter to the Romans James A

    A Study of Paul's Interpretation of the Old Testament with Particular Reference to His Use of Isaiah in the Letter to the Romans James A

    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Western Evangelical Seminary Theses Western Evangelical Seminary 5-1-1959 A Study of Paul's Interpretation of the Old Testament with Particular Reference to His Use of Isaiah in the Letter to the Romans James A. Field Recommended Citation Field, James A., "A Study of Paul's Interpretation of the Old Testament with Particular Reference to His Use of Isaiah in the Letter to the Romans" (1959). Western Evangelical Seminary Theses. 134. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/wes_theses/134 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Evangelical Seminary at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Evangelical Seminary Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. APPROVED BY l'fajor Professor: ~~ • ..,e ~~ I Co-operat.ive Reader: ~ f. w~ Professor of Thesis Form: Gby~ A STUDY OF PAUL'S INTERPRETATIOl~ OF THE OLD TESTAHENT WITH PARTICULAR REFER.E.'NCE ro HIS USE OF ISAIAH IN THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS by James A. Field A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Western Evangelical Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Divinity Portland 22, Oregon May, 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. DIJTRODUCTION., • • • • • • • • .. .. • • • • • • • • • . l A. Statement of the Problem. • • • • • • • • • ••••• l B. Statement of the Pu~pose.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4 c. Justification for the Study • • • • • • • • ••••• 4 D. Limitations of the Study. • • • • • • • • • ••••• 5 E. Statement of Procedure. • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• 6 II. HISTORICAL SURVEY OF LITERATURE ON THE l'iiDi'l TESTA1<IENT USE OF THE OLD 'l'ESTAl1ENT • • • • • • • • • • 7 A.
  • The Dead Sea Scrolls

    The Dead Sea Scrolls

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2000 The eD ad Sea Scrolls: Questions and Responses for Latter-day Saints Donald W. Parry Stephen D. Ricks Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Parry, Donald W. and Ricks, Stephen D., "The eD ad Sea Scrolls: Questions and Responses for Latter-day Saints" (2000). Maxwell Institute Publications. 25. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/25 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Preface What is the Copper Scroll? Do the Dead Sea Scrolls contain lost books of the Bible? Did John the Baptist study with the people of Qumran? What is the Temple Scroll? What about DNA research and the scrolls? We have responded to scores of such questions on many occasions—while teaching graduate seminars and Hebrew courses at Brigham Young University, presenting papers at professional symposia, and speaking to various lay audiences. These settings are always positive experiences for us, particularly because they reveal that the general membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has a deep interest in the scrolls and other writings from the ancient world. The nonbiblical Dead Sea Scrolls are of great import because they shed much light on the cultural, religious, and political position of some of the Jews who lived shortly before and during the time of Jesus Christ.
  • Psalms Psalm

    Psalms Psalm

    Cultivate - PSALMS PSALM 126: We now come to the seventh of the "Songs of Ascent," a lovely group of Psalms that God's people would sing and pray together as they journeyed up to Jerusalem. Here in this Psalm they are praying for the day when the Lord would "restore the fortunes" of God's people (vs.1,4). 126 is a prayer for spiritual revival and reawakening. The first half is all happiness and joy, remembering how God answered this prayer once. But now that's just a memory... like a dream. They need to be renewed again. So they call out to God once more: transform, restore, deliver us again. Don't you think this is a prayer that God's people could stand to sing and pray today? Pray it this week. We'll pray it together on Sunday. God is here inviting such prayer; he's even putting the very words in our mouths. PSALM 127: This is now the eighth of the "Songs of Ascent," which God's people would sing on their procession up to the temple. We've seen that Zion / Jerusalem / The House of the Lord are all common themes in these Psalms. But the "house" that Psalm 127 refers to (in v.1) is that of a dwelling for a family. 127 speaks plainly and clearly to our anxiety-ridden thirst for success. How can anything be strong or successful or sufficient or secure... if it does not come from the Lord? Without the blessing of the Lord, our lives will come to nothing.
  • Traditions About Miriam in the Qumran Scrolls

    Traditions About Miriam in the Qumran Scrolls

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department Classics and Religious Studies 2003 Traditions about Miriam in the Qumran Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classics Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "Traditions about Miriam in the Qumran Scrolls" (2003). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 97. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/97 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in STUDIES IN JEWISH CIVILIZATION, VOLUME 14: WOMEN AND JUDAISM, ed. Leonard J. Greenspoon, Ronald A. Simkins, & Jean Axelrad Cahan (Omaha: Creighton University Press, 2003), pp. 33-44. Traditions about Miriam in the Qumran Scrolls Sidnie White Crawford The literature of Second Temple Judaism (late sixth century BCE to 70 CE) contains many compositions that focus on characters and events known from the biblical texts. The characters or events in these new compositions are developed in various ways: filling in gaps in the biblical account, offering explanations for difficult passages, or simply adding details to the lives of biblical personages to make them fuller and more interesting characters. For example, the work known as Joseph andAseneth focuses on the biblical character Aseneth, the Egyptian wife of Joseph, mentioned only briefly in Gen 41:45, 50.' This work attempts to explain, among other things, how Joseph, the righteous son of Jacob, contracted an exogamous marriage with the daughter of an Egyptian priest.
  • BSBB9401 DEAD SEA SCROLLS Fall 2018 Dr. R. Dennis Cole NOBTS Mcfarland Chair of Archaeology Dodd Faculty 201 Rdcole@Nobts.Edu 504-282-4455 X3248

    BSBB9401 DEAD SEA SCROLLS Fall 2018 Dr. R. Dennis Cole NOBTS Mcfarland Chair of Archaeology Dodd Faculty 201 [email protected] 504-282-4455 X3248

    BSBB9401 DEAD SEA SCROLLS Fall 2018 Dr. R. Dennis Cole NOBTS Mcfarland Chair of Archaeology Dodd Faculty 201 [email protected] 504-282-4455 x3248 NOBTS MISSION STATEMENT The mission of New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is to equip leaders to fulfill the Great Commission and the Great Commandments through the local church and its ministries. COURSE PURPOSE, CORE VALUE FOCUS, AND CURRICULUM COMPETENCIES New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary has five core values: Doctrinal Integrity, Spiritual Vitality, Mission Focus, Characteristic Excellence, and Servant Leadership. These values shape both the context and manner in which all curricula are taught, with “doctrinal integrity” and “characteristic academic excellence” being especially highlighted in this course. NOBTS has seven basic competencies guiding our degree programs. The student will develop skills in Biblical Exposition, Christian Theological Heritage, Disciple Making, Interpersonal Skills, Servant Leadership, Spiritual & Character Formation, and Worship Leadership. This course addresses primarily the compentency of “Biblical Exposition” competency by helping the student learn to interpret the Bible accurately through a better understanding of its historical and theological context. During the Academic Year 2018-19, the focal competency will be Doctrinal Integrity.. COURSE DESCRIPTION Research includes historical background and description of the Qumran cult and problems relating to the significance and dating of the Scrolls. Special emphasis is placed on a theological analysis of the non- biblical texts of the Dead Sea library on subjects such as God, man, and eschatology. Meaningful comparisons are sought in the Qumran view of sin, atonement, forgiveness, ethics, and messianic expectation with Jewish and Christian views of the Old and New Testaments as well as other Interbiblical literature.
  • The End of an Era Frank Moore Cross (1921-2012)

    The End of an Era Frank Moore Cross (1921-2012)

    This article is reproduced by the Society of Biblical Literature with permission from Biblical Archaeology Review. The End of an Era Frank Moore Cross (1921-2012) Hershel Shanks • 10/18/2012 There will be a memorial service for Professor Cross in Memorial Church in Harvard Yard on Saturday, November 10th, at 4:00 p.m. We knew it would happen, but it’s still a shock. Frank Cross is dead. I will leave it to scholars to write of his scholarly accomplishments. I will only write of what I know: He stood at the very pinnacle of the profession, universally respected and admired. When he spoke, others stood in awe. The Hancock Professor of Hebrew and Other Oriental Languages at Harvard University, the third oldest endowed academic chair in the United States, Cross was a specialist in the Dead Sea Scrolls, in obscure ancient languages, in the science of dating ancient inscriptions based on the shape of the letters, in the Biblical text and in archaeology, to name but a few. I’ve been at this desk for almost 40 years and by now I can comfortably engage with senior colleagues. In the early years, however, I was a newcomer. I was a lawyer who had never taken a course in archaeology or even in the Bible. In those days, I divided scholars into two categories—those who welcomed novices like me and the other kind, who looked at me from their empyrean heights. Frank was clearly in the former group and I valued his friendship more than I can say.