Qumran Caves” in the Iron Age in the Light of the Pottery Evidence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Qumran Caves” in the Iron Age in the Light of the Pottery Evidence CHAPTER 17 History of the “Qumran Caves” in the Iron Age in the Light of the Pottery Evidence Mariusz Burdajewicz Since the late ‘40s and the beginning of the ‘50s of the last Jerusalem carried out a survey of about 270 sites situated century, the north-eastern part of the Judean Desert has to the north and south of the Qumran site.4 Of the 40 sites been witnessing numerous archaeological surveys and (almost exclusively caves or cavities), where the traces of works (Table 17.1; Fig. 17.1). The main, but not the only one, human presence from various periods were found, only goal of various expeditions sent to the Dead Sea region, few of them yielded the finds pertaining to the Iron Age. was the quest for more and more scrolls. On this occasion, One large bowl and one lamp came from caves GQ 27 and apart from manuscripts, many other artefacts, like pottery GQ 39 respectively.5 Fragments of two vessels dated to the and the so-called small finds,1 have come to light. Their Iron Age II are mentioned as coming from cave GQ 13, and chronology range in date from the Chalcolithic to the a few pottery sherds, possibly dated to the same period, Arab periods. from cave GQ 6.6 The survey was completed in 1956, and The aim of this short paper is to present, on the basis of some additional pottery fragments from the Iron Age pottery evidence, some observations concerning the use were found in cave 11Q (fragments of jars, two lamps and of the caves during the Iron Age II–III. The later part of the rounded juglet)7 and in two caves, A and B, situated near Iron Age II, roughly the 8th–7th/6th centuries BCE, corre- Cave GQ 8 (=3Q).8 sponds with the earliest phase of the settlement at Khirbet Of the ten artificial caves carved in the marl terrace, Qumran itself, represented mainly by pottery finds2 and in the very close vicinity of the settlement, only one (9Q) possibly by some architectural structures.3 Although this yielded material evidence from the Iron Age. It is a single conference is focused on the so-called Qumran caves, we fragment of a bowl, burnished horizontally. The bowl, cannot exclude from our investigation caves which are dated by de Vaux to the 8th–7th centuries BCE,9 rep- more remote from the Wadi, and the ruins of Qumran resents the same type as bowl from cave 27 mentioned itself. Methodological approach, which has been chosen, above (cf. Fig. 4:1).10 requires to perceive the “Qumran caves” in the context of In a survey conducted by Joseph Patrich at the turn of many other caves which pierce the rocky escarpment of 1984 and 1985, Cave XIII/2, which also may be the very the Rift Valley west of the Dead Sea littoral, and not as an same one as that surveyed in 1952 by the QCE (=Cave 37), isolated geographical/cultural phenomenon. was investigated. The excavation yielded an interesting In March 1952 the Qumran Cave Expedition (hereaf- assemblage of objects, including pottery, as well as two ter QCE) from the École Biblique et Archéologique in burials dated to the Iron Age.11 1 See in this volume, Dennis Mizzi. 4 Maurice Baillet, Józef T. Milik, and Roland de Vaux, eds.; Les 2 Mariusz Burdajewicz, “La poterie de l’âge du Fer à Khirbet Qumrân,” ‘petites grottes’ de Qumrân: Exploration de la falaise; Les grottes (forthcoming). 2Q, 3Q, 5Q, 6Q, 7Q à 10Q; Le rouleau de cuivre (DJD 3; Oxford: 3 Roland de Vaux, Archaeology and the Dead Sea Scrolls (The Schweich Clarendon Press, 1962). Lectures 1959; rev. ed.; London: Oxford University Press for the 5 Roland de Vaux, “Archéologie,” in DJD 3:10, 12, Figs. 5.1, 5.3; Pl. 7. British Academy, 1973), 2, Pl. 3. However, de Vaux’s reconstruction of 6 De Vaux, in DJD 3:7–8. the Israelite building has been recently questioned (Jean-Baptiste 7 Roland de Vaux, “Fouilles de Khirbet Qumrân: Rapport prélimi- Humbert, “Arguments en faveur d’une résidence pré-essénienne,” in naire sur les 3e 4e et 5e campagnes,” RB 63 (1956): 574. Fouilles de Khirbet Qumrân et ‘Aïn Feshkha: Études d’anthropologie, de 8 De Vaux, in DJD 3:13, Cave A: “Quelques tessons du Fer II;” Cave physique et de chimie [ed. J.-B. Humbert and J. Gunneweg; Fribourg/ B: “peu de tessons (. .), davantage du Fer II.” Göttingen: Éditions Universitaires/Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 9 De Vaux, in DJD 3:31. 2003], 468). See also Yitzhak Magen and Yuval Peleg, The Qumran 10 I am very grateful to prof. Joan Taylor from the King’s College Excavations 1993–2004: Preliminary Report (JSP 6; Jerusalem: Staff London, for her help in identification of this bowl. Officer of Archaeology, Civil Administration of Judea and Samaria/ 11 Joseph Patrich, “Hideouts in the Judean Wilderness: Jewish Israel Antiquities Authority, 2007), 376–80, 407, Fig. 4. Revolutionaries and Christian Ascetics Sought Shelter and © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi ��.��63/97890043�6508_0�9 248 BURDAJEWICZ During the same survey, Cave 13 has been identified to Moving to the south, two sites should be mentioned. the north of Cave GQ 8 (=3Q). According to the excavators, The first site is located in Wadi Murabba‘at, about 18 it may have been the same cave which is marked as No. 2 km south of Khirbet Qumran, where four caves were in the French publication. Among the discovered finds investigated by the expedition of the École Biblique et there were rim fragments of two cooking pots, one bowl Archéologique. Caves 1, 2 and 3 contained an unspecified and bowl base, all dated in general to the Iron Age II.12 number of Iron Age pottery sherds. The published finds The survey “Operation Scroll,” carried out on behalf of include fragments of two hole-mouth jars with two (or the Israel Antiquities Authority in the Northern Judean four?) handles, one large bowl and one juglet from Cave 2, Desert,13 brought to light evidence of human presence and only one fragmentary bowl from Cave 1. Cave 3, apart in about 165 caves.14 Artifacts, mainly pottery, dated to from some Iron Age pottery sherds (unpublished), yielded the Iron Age have been found in 16 caves, of which only also other small objects, which could be possibly dated nine are located in the southern part of the surveyed area to the Iron Age.21 Roland de Vaux also published a water (regions X–XIV). Among these caves, six yielded pottery container (decanter) which, already after excavations, was dated in general to the Iron Age; from two caves came evi- found nearby in a hole in the rock, and a very interesting dence from the Iron Age II, while in the other cave the seven-nozzled lamp, which in turn was purchased from finds were assigned to the Iron Age II–III period. Bedouins.22 Very interesting is Cave XII/49,15 which probably was The other site is the “Cave of the Pool,” which was excavated in the past by Roland de Vaux.16 From here examined in the framework of the Expedition to the comes the largest assemblage of the pottery dated to the Judean Desert on behalf of the Israel Exploration Society. Iron Age II–III. The following types are represented: jars, The Iron Age pottery found in the cave is represented by bowls, cooking pots and juglets.17 fragments of a bowl, two cooking pots, lamp, three jugs From Cave XII/56 rim fragments of two jugs dated to (decanters) and juglet. This pottery assemblage is dated Iron Age are reported,18 and from Cave XIII/13 rim frag- by the excavators to the late 7th century BCE.23 ment of a large bowl.19 Also three caves, XI/15, XIV/55 and XIV/56, yielded fragments of Iron Age pottery; unfortu- nately, no details and illustrations have been published.20 1 Discussion of Pottery Types Protection in Cliffside Caves,” BAR 15/5 (1989): 32–42 (34); Robert Pottery is one of the main means that we have at our dis- Eisenman, “The 1988–1922 California State University Dead Sea posal to investigate various topics concerning the history Walking Cave Survey and Radar Ground Scan of the Qumran of the caves. However, the Iron Age material from the Cliffs,” QC 9 (December 2000): 123; Nir Tal and Gershon Oron, caves, with regard to the pottery finds, is not numerous, “Survey and Excavations of Caves along the Fault Escarpment South of Qumran,” ʿAtiqot 41/2 (2002): 189. and the repertoire of ceramic types is quite limited. There 12 Joseph Patrich and Benny Arubas, “A Juglet containing Balsam is also no real Iron Age stratigraphy in the caves, which, in Oil (?) from a Cave near Qumran,” IEJ 39 (1989): 46, Fig. 3:2–5; addition, were re-used and disturbed in the later periods. Joseph Patrich, “Qumran Caves,” ESI 13 (1995): 64; Michel Itah, It means that any analysis of the caves’ chronology, his- Yoni Kam, and Ronny Ben Haim, “Survey and Excavations of tory, etc., has to be based on comparative pottery research. Caves along the Fault Escarpment South of Almog Junction and Inevitably, we must refer to the better known and more West of Qalya,” ʿAtiqot 41/2 (2002): 169–76. abundant pottery assemblages, coming from other sites, 13 Lior Wexler, ed., “Surveys and Excavations of Caves in the particularly from Khirbet Qumran, which is the closest Northern Judean Desert (CNJD)—1993,” Part 1 [Hebrew], Part 2 [English], ʿAtiqot 41 (2002).
Recommended publications
  • Bible from Qumran Sidnie White Crawford
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sidnie White Crawford Publications Classics and Religious Studies 2014 The O" ther" Bible from Qumran Sidnie White Crawford Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crawfordpubs This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sidnie White Crawford Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The "Other" Bible from Qumran by Sidnie White Crawford Where did the Bible come from? The Hebrew Bible, or Christian Old Testament, did not exist in the canonical form we know prior to the early second century C.E. Before that, certain books had become authoritative in the Jewish community, but the status of other books, which eventually did become part of the Hebrew Bible, was questionable. All Jews everywhere, since at least the fourth century B.C.E., accepted the authority of the Torah of Moses, the first five books of the Bible (also called the Pentateuch): Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Most Jews also accepted the books of the Prophets, including the Former Prophets or historical books (Joshua through Kings), as authoritative. The Samaritan community only accepted the Pentateuch as authoritative, and the Pentateuch remains their Bible today. Some parts of the Jewish community accepted the books found in the Writings as authoritative, but not all Jews accepted all of those books. The Jewish community that lived at Qumran and stored their manuscripts in the nearby caves, for example, do not seem to have accepted Esther as authoritative.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places
    Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society 2007 Volume 25 Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, Genizas and Hiding Places STEPHEN PFANN In December 1952, five years after the discovery of Qumran cave 1, Roland de Vaux connected its manuscript remains to the nearby site of Khirbet Qumran when he found one of the unique cylindrical jars, typical of cave 1Q, embedded in the floor of the site. The power of this suggestion was such that, from that point on, as each successive Judean Desert cave containing first-century scrolls was discovered, they, too, were assumed to have originated from the site of Qumran. Even the scrolls discovered at Masada were thought to have arrived there by the hands of Essene refugees. Other researchers have since proposed that certain teachings within the scrolls of Qumran’s caves provide evidence for a sect that does not match that of the Essenes described by first-century writers such as Josephus, Philo and Pliny. These researchers prefer to call this group ‘the Qumran Community’, ‘the Covenanters’, ‘the Yahad ’ or simply ‘sectarians’. The problem is that no single title sufficiently covers the doctrines presented in the scrolls, primarily since there is a clear diversity in doctrine among these scrolls.1 In this article, I would like to present a challenge to this monolithic approach to the understanding of the caves and their scroll collections. This reassessment will be based on a close examination of the material culture of the caves (including ceramics and fabrics) and the palaeographic dating of the scroll collections in individual caves.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham the Profile and Character of Qumran
    University of Birmingham The Profile and Character of Qumran Cave 4 Hempel, Charlotte DOI: 10.1163/9789004316508_006 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Hempel, C 2016, The Profile and Character of Qumran Cave 4: The Community Rule Manuscripts as a Test Case. in M Fidanzio (ed.), The Caves of Qumran: Proceedings of the International Conference, Lugano 2014. STDJ, vol. 118, Brill, Leiden. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004316508_006 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Publisher conditions checked General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Qumran Collection As a Scribal Library Sidnie White Crawford
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sidnie White Crawford Publications Classics and Religious Studies 2016 The Qumran Collection as a Scribal Library Sidnie White Crawford Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crawfordpubs This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sidnie White Crawford Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Qumran Collection as a Scribal Library Sidnie White Crawford Since the early days of Dead Sea Scrolls scholarship, the collection of scrolls found in the eleven caves in the vicinity of Qumran has been identified as a library.1 That term, however, was undefined in relation to its ancient context. In the Greco-Roman world the word “library” calls to mind the great libraries of the Hellenistic world, such as those at Alexandria and Pergamum.2 However, a more useful comparison can be drawn with the libraries unearthed in the ancient Near East, primarily in Mesopotamia but also in Egypt.3 These librar- ies, whether attached to temples or royal palaces or privately owned, were shaped by the scribal elite of their societies. Ancient Near Eastern scribes were the literati in a largely illiterate society, and were responsible for collecting, preserving, and transmitting to future generations the cultural heritage of their peoples. In the Qumran corpus, I will argue, we see these same interests of collection, preservation, and transmission. Thus I will demonstrate that, on the basis of these comparisons, the Qumran collection is best described as a library with an archival component, shaped by the interests of the elite scholar scribes who were responsible for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Qumran: Founded for Scripture
    SPECIAL LECTURE Qumran: Founded for Scripture. The Background and Significance of the Dead Sea Scrolls HARTMUT STEGEMANN Georg-August-Universita¨tGo¨ttingen ONCEUPONATIME there was a beautiful young princess who—together with all her staff and all the animals within her palace—fell asleep for a long period of time. An angry fairy had put a curse on her to cause her to die by pricking her finger with a spindle. But afterwards, another more gracious fairy had turned her fate into a long sleep until one day a bold prince should enter her chamber and wake her. Meanwhile, her castle became surrounded by a great number of trees, interlaced with brambles and thorns, a hedge so thick that neither man nor beast could penetrate it. There are several possible ways to identify the leading figure of this fairy tale with Qumran topics. There are three suitable candidates for an identifica- tion with Sleeping Beauty, namely the scrolls hidden in the caves, the often neglected reports by some ancient writers on the Essenes, and the ruins of Chirbet Qumran, lonely for almost a hundred generations. Each of these possible identifications also includes a well-known rescuing prince, even if none of those first heroes succeeded in becoming the decisive saviour of Sleeping Beauty. Meanwhile, half a century of research since the discovery of the first Qumran scrolls has produced more than ten thousand manuscript editions, scholarly books, and learned articles on this subject. Nevertheless, many of the basic riddles of these unexpected findings are still unresolved. Some helpful suggestions in earlier stages of Qumran research are again over- whelmed by new thorns, and the younger generation of Qumran scholars seems to be occupied much more with mistaken results of earlier research than with Proceedings of the British Academy, 97, 1–14.
    [Show full text]
  • Illness and Healing Through Spell and Incantation in the Dead Sea Scrolls
    CHAPTER 7 Illness and Healing through Spell and Incantation in the Dead Sea Scrolls David Hamidović The 950 manuscripts found in eleven caves around the site of Khirbet Qumran, located at the North-West of the Dead Sea shore, constitute one of the most amazing discoveries of the twentieth century. Following the final publication of the scrolls at the beginning of the twenty-first century, we are continuing to discover how complex ancient Judaism was at the turn of the era, far beyond what we had previously imagined. Indeed, one third of these manuscripts constitute the oldest physical witnesses to the Hebrew Bible; the diversity of versions for the same passages provides new insights into the canonisation process of the Hebrew Bible and a new understanding of the status of these texts within Judaism. The other two thirds present mostly unknown Jewish texts. Many of them deal with the life of a community named in Hebrew yaḥad, designating a set of groups belonging to the Jewish movement known as the Essenes, already known from the ancient notices of Flavius Josephus, Philo of Alexandria and Pliny the Elder. For other documents, it is difficult to recognize an Essene milieu; they seem to have been composed before the birth of Essenism, yet are also preserved within the Qumran caves. The Qumran manuscripts are therefore not only the so-called library of the Essene move- ment, as is often said, but also a conservatory of Jewish documents from the final centuries BC. The common point of these texts and their raison d’être in the caves is their deliberate selection by the Essenes due to the correspon- dence of the ideas they espoused with Essene doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Storage Conditions and Physical Treatments Relating to the Dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls
    [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 37, No. 1, 1995, P. 21-32] STORAGE CONDITIONS AND PHYSICAL TREATMENTS RELATING TO THE DATING OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS NICCOLO CALDARARO Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132 USA ABSTRACT. The Dead Sea Scrolls have been analyzed by paleographic, non-destructive and destructive testing. The dates of their creation have been in dispute since their discovery. Research has established their authenticity, but a variety of con- ditions including the methods of skin preparation, variation in storage conditions and post-discovery restoration treatments could have introduced changes now affecting dating efforts. Comprehensive analyses were not possible until recently. Such analysis must be performed to establish a concrete framework for all the texts. Professor R. B. Blake told a story in response to a question of why so little remained of writing on leather. He said that on one of his expedi- tions to Asia Minor, one of his native servants exhibited proudly some chamois trousers of his own manufacture, upon which Professor Blake detected with sorrow, traces of medieval writing (Reed 1972). INTRODUCTION A recent 14C study of 14 Dead Sea Scrolls by Bonani et al. (1992) is a welcome addition to the ana- lytical literature on the Scrolls. The authors have undertaken a more comprehensive sampling than any previous study, an effort that T. B. Kahle and I proposed in an article in Nature in 1986. In that article, we commented on amino acid racemization analysis of the Dead Sea Scrolls published by Weiner et al. (1980). Our comments then, as mine now, relate to the potential effects on dating results of prior storage conditions and restoration treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Teacher of Righteousness, Collective Memory, and Tradition at Qumran by Gianc
    MANUFACTURING HISTORY AND IDENTITY: A STUDY ON THE TEACHER OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, COLLECTIVE MEMORY, AND TRADITION AT QUMRAN BY GIANCARLO P. ANGULO A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Religion May 2014 Winston Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Kenneth G. Hoglund, Ph.D., Advisor Jarrod Whitaker, Ph.D., Chair Clinton J. Moyer, Ph.D. Acknowledgments It would not be possible to adequately present the breadth of my gratitude in the scope of this short acknowledgment section. That being said, I would like to extend a few thanks to some of those who have most influenced my academic and personal progression during my time in academia. To begin, I would be remiss not to mention the many excellent professors and specifically Dr. Erik Larson at Florida International University. The Religious Studies department at my undergraduate university nurtured my nascent fascination with religion and the Dead Sea Scrolls and launched me into the career I am now seeking to pursue. Furthermore, a thank you goes out to my readers Dr. Jarrod Whitaker and Dr. Clinton Moyer. You have both presented me with wonderful opportunities during my time at Wake Forest University that have helped to develop me into the student and speaker I am today. Your guidance and review of this thesis have proven essential for me to produce my very best work. Also, a very special thank you must go out to my advisor, professor, and friend, Dr. Ken Hoglund.
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Publications of Museum of the Bible
    Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Publications of Museum of the Bible General Editor Michael W. Holmes volume 1 Semitic Texts Editor Emanuel Tov Managing Editor Jerry A. Pattengale The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/pmb Dead Sea Scrolls Fragments in the Museum Collection Edited by Emanuel Tov Kipp Davis Robert Duke leiden | boston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Tov, Emanuel, editor. | Davis, Kipp, editor. | Duke, Robert R., editor. Title: Dead sea scrolls fragments in the Museum collection / edited by Emanuel Tov, Kipp Davis, Robert Duke. Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, [2016] | Series: Publications of Museum of the Bible, ISSN 2214-2797 ; volume 1 Identifiers: LCCN 2016015778 (print) | LCCN 2016016485 (ebook) | ISBN 9789004321489 ((hardback) : alk. paper) | ISBN 9789004322868 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Dead Sea scrolls. Classification: LCC BM487 .D44957 2016 (print) | LCC BM487 (ebook) | DDC 296.1/55074753–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016015778 Want or need Open Access? Brill Open offers you the choice to make your research freely accessible online in exchange for a publication charge. Review your various options on brill.com/brill-open. Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 2214-2797 isbn 978-90-04-32148-9 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-32286-8 (e-book) Copyright 2016 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Valediction of Moses
    Forschungen zum Alten Testament Edited by Konrad Schmid (Zürich) · Mark S. Smith (Princeton) Hermann Spieckermann (Göttingen) · Andrew Teeter (Harvard) 145 Idan Dershowitz The Valediction of Moses A Proto-Biblical Book Mohr Siebeck Idan Dershowitz: born 1982; undergraduate and graduate training at the Hebrew University, following several years of yeshiva study; 2017 elected to the Harvard Society of Fellows; currently Chair of Hebrew Bible and Its Exegesis at the University of Potsdam. orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-8504 Open access sponsored by the Julis-Rabinowitz Program on Jewish and Israeli Law at the Harvard Law School. ISBN 978-3-16-160644-1 / eISBN 978-3-16-160645-8 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-160645-8 ISSN 0940-4155 / eISSN 2568-8359 (Forschungen zum Alten Testament) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This work is licensed under the license “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Inter- national” (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). A complete Version of the license text can be found at: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Any use not covered by the above license is prohibited and illegal without the permission of the publisher. The book was printed on non-aging paper by Gulde Druck in Tübingen, and bound by Buch- binderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the generosity of my friends, family, and colleagues. The Harvard Society of Fellows provided the ideal environment for this ven- ture.Atatimeinwhichacademiaisbecomingincreasinglyriskaverse,theSociety remains devoted to supporting its fellows’ passion projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dead Sea Scrolls: Retrospective and Prospective
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department Classics and Religious Studies 2003 The Dead Sea Scrolls: Retrospective and Prospective Sidnie White Crawford University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub Part of the Classics Commons Crawford, Sidnie White, "The Dead Sea Scrolls: Retrospective and Prospective" (2003). Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department. 119. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/classicsfacpub/119 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics and Religious Studies at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Classics and Religious Studies Department by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Pesher (Commentary) Habakkuk. This is one of the original four scrolls brought to the American School in Jerusalem in 1948. Published in Near Eastern Archaeology 65:1 (2002), pp. 81–86. Copyright © 2003 American Schools of Oriental Research he Dead Sea Scrolls—in the popu- Tlar imagination, the very name con- THE jures up scandal, intrigue and mystery. Tales of illicit excavations, clandestine purchases, and midnight trips to Beirut, DEAD SEA all with the sound of gunfire crackling in the background, abound in the lore SCROLLS of the Scrolls and the scholars associ- ated with them. While visions of Roland RETROSPECTIVE de Vaux as a French Indiana Jones may AND PROSPECTIVE be the product of an overheated imagi- nation, the actual story of the discovery Sidnie White Crawford of the Scrolls is nevertheless an exciting one in the annals of archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Khirbet Qumran: a Farm for a Religious Community All
    CHAPTER SEVEN A TABLE PREPARED IN THE WILDERNESS: PANTRIES AND TABLES, PURE FOOD AND SACRED SPACE AT QUMRAN Stephen Pfann Khirbet Qumran: geology, and ethnography on their own cannot A Farm for a Religious Community fully reconstruct the life practices of ancient soci- eties. Each specialist must have sufficient mater- All people need to eat, even Essenes. It has been ial from the site to arrive at a tentative conclusion, emphasized by several participants in this con- and, in the end, they must judge for themselves ference that the site of Qumran was a farm, with the degree of certainty they should apply to their no connection to a religious society. However, the overall conclusions. This is often best done by fact that there is sufficient archaeological evidence cross-checking their results against those of col- to show that the inhabitants of the sites of Khirbet leagues in their own field or of researchers in Qumran and 'Ain Feshkha raised crops or tended other specialties. Khirbet Qumran is a rare site sheep does not preclude the fact that the inhab- in the ancient world where most remains have itants were members of a Jewish religious sect, survived in a relatively superb state of preserva- such as the Essenes. On the contrary, the culti- tion. For the natural scientist, the environment vation of date palms, grapevines, wheat and bar- has undergone little change in the past two thou- ley fields, and even the collection and processing sand years. For the archaeologist, the ruins of of indigo or balsam, should be seen as an inte- Qumran have survived with walls often standing gral part of the daily tasks of such a group, as is above one’s head and with a rich volume of mate- also indicated by the ancient writers.
    [Show full text]