DOCSLIB.ORG

Reportable Disease Desk Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reportable Disease Desk Reference Page 1 REPORTABLE DISEASE DESK REFERENCE Division of Epidemiology and Health Planning Department for Public Health Commonwealth of Kentucky April, 2006 Page 2 FOREWORD In the United States, requirements for reporting diseases are mandated by state laws or regulations, and the list of reportable diseases in each state varies. The Kentucky Disease Surveillance Administrative Regulations 902 KAR 2:020 require reporting of Communicable Diseases to the local health departments and the Kentucky Department for Public Health. Additionally, state health departments report cases of selected diseases to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS), on a weekly basis. These data are published weekly in the Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). An updated final report is published annually in the Summary of Notifiable Diseases. With the 2006 version of the desk reference, we have tried to adhere as closely as possible to the case definitions developed by the CDC and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) published in “Case Definitions for Public Health Surveillance”, MMWR 1997; 46:RR-10 and available on the CDC’s Epidemiology Program Office website, http://www.cdc.gov/epo/dphsi/casedef/index.htm. As uniform case definitions are adopted by the states, the incidence of reported diseases in different geographic areas may be more meaningfully compared at the local, state, and national levels. KYEPHRS AND THE DISEASE SURVEILLANCE MODULE The Kentucky Electronic Public Health Record System (KY-EPHRS) provides the backbone of an integrated electronic health record, including disease surveillance. The Disease Surveillance is one of several modules that make up KY-EPHRS. Hospitals and health departments will use this system for the initial notification of potential reportable diseases. The application contains patient demographic data, test results, symptoms, and lab results. The health department’s staff then makes the determination if the disease needs further investigation. Upon the completion of the investigation, infection control investigators determine if the case should be forwarded to state officials for confirmation. If the case is confirmed, KY-EPHRS will electronically transmit the information to the CDC. For more information on filing electronically you may contact the Help Center by phone between the hours of 8:00 am - 4:30 pm EST, Monday through Friday. The office is closed on state approved holidays. The toll free number is 877-545-6175, for outside the Frankfort area. For calls within the local Frankfort area, call 564-9926 or 564-9971. You may contact the Help Center by email at any time. Help Center staff monitors this mailbox and will respond as soon as possible to your request. The address is [email protected]. This address is also listed in the state global directory under CHFS KYEPHRS. Additional information is available on the KY Department for Public Health website at: http://chfs.ky.gov/dph/ephrs/ TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD, TABLE OF CONTENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………… 1-6 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………. 7 Purpose of this Manual………………………………………………………. 8 Definition of Terms………………………………………………………….. 8 Major Statutes Applicable to Communicable Disease………………………. 10 DPH Division of Epidemiology and Health Planning Staff Contacts……….. 11 Local Health Department Contact Persons………………………………….. 14 Regional Epidemiologists …………………………………………………… 17 Local Health Department Districts’ Contact Persons……………………….. 20 Kentucky Hospital Infection Control Professionals………………………….. 21 DISEASE SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Surveillance Procedures……………………………………………………… 29 EPIDEMIOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS Disease Outbreaks……………………………………………………………. 35 Introduction and Background…………………………………………….. 36 Procedures for Epidemiologic Investigations…………………………….. 36 Requesting Outbreak Assistance…………………………………………. 38 Local Health Department Responsibilities……………………………….. 38 State Epidemiologist’s Responsibilities………………………………….. 39 Role of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)…………. 39 Components of an Outbreak Investigation Report……………………… 39 CASE DEFINITIONS FOR REPORTABLE DISEASES ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME (AIDS)/………….….. 42 HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV) INFECTION ANTHRAX…………………………………………………………………… 46 BOTULISM, Infant………………………………………………………… 48 BOTULISM…………………………………………………………………. 50 BRUCELLOSIS……………………………………………………………… 52 CAMPYLOBACTERIOSIS…………………………………………………. 54 CHANCROID………………………………………………………………... 56 CHLAMYDIA………………………………………………………………. 58 CHOLERA………………………………………………………………….. 60 CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS……………………………………………………. 62 DIPHTHERIA………………………………………………………………. 64 EHRLICHIOSIS…………………………………………………………….. 66 ENCEPHALITIS, ARBOVIRAL…………………………………………… 68 ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7……………………………………………. 70 FOODBORNE DISEASE OUTBREAK…………………………………… 73 GONORRHEA……………………………………………………………… 75 GRANULOMA INGUINALE……………………………………………… 77 HAEMOPHILUS INFLUENZA……………………………………………. 79 HANSEN’S DISEASE (LEPROSY)……………………………………….. 81 HANTAVIRUS PULMONARY SYNDROME……………………………. 83 HEPATITIS A………………………………………………………………. 85 HEPATITIS B, ACUTE…………………………………………………….. 87 HEPATITIS B INFECTION (in a pregnant woman or child)……………………. 90 HEPATITIS C, ACUTE…………………………………………………….. 93 HISTOPLASMOSIS………………………………………………………… 95 INFLUENZA………………………………………………………………... 97 LEGIONELLOSIS (LEGIONNAIRE’S DISEASE)………………………… 99 LISTERIOSIS………………………………………………………………… 102 LYME DISEASE……………………………………………………………… 104 LYMPHOGRANULOMA VENEREUM…………………………………… 108 MALARIA…………………………………………………………………… 110 MEASLES (RUBEOLA)……………………………………………………… 113 MENINGOCOCCAL DISEASE……………………………………………… 115 MUMPS……………………………………………………………………… 117 PERTUSSIS……………………………………………………………………….. 119 PLAGUE………………………………………………………………………….. 122 POLIOMYELITIS…………………………………………………………………. 124 PSITTACOSIS……………………………………………………………………... 126 Q FEVER……………………………………………………………………………128 RABIES (ANIMAL)……………………………………………………………….. 130 RABIES (HUMAN)……………………………………………………………….. 132 RABIES POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS…………………………………… 134 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER……………………………………….. 136 RUBELLA…………………………………………………………………………. 138 RUBELLA, CONGENITAL SYNDROME………………………………………. 141 SALMONELLOSIS……………………………………………………………….. 144 SHIGELLOSIS……………………………………………………………………. 146 STD’S VOLUNTARILY REPORTABLE……………………………………….. 148 STREPTOCOCCAL DISEASE, INVASIVE GROUPA…………………………. 150 STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE, drug resistant invasive disease…………… 152 SYPHILIS………………………………………………………………………… 154 TETANUS………………………………………………………………………… 157 TOXIC-SHOCK SYNDROME…………………………………………………… 159 TOXOPLASMOSIS………………………………………………………………. 162 TUBERCULOSIS…………………………………………………………………. 164 TULAREMIA……………………………………………………………………. 167 TYPHOID FEVER……………………………………………………………….. 169 VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS AND VIBRIO VULNIFICUS……………... 171 WATERBORNE OUTBREAK…………………………………………………... 173 YELLOW FEVER………………………………………………………………. 174 APPENDIX A…….Kentucky Disease Surveillance Administrative Regulation………… 176 APPENDIX B……Disease Surveillance Forms……. …………………………………… 192 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The staff of the Division of Epidemiology and Health Planning developed this desk reference to facilitate the reporting of diseases and conditions. Our intention is that it will be used regularly and that it will address many questions concerning reportable diseases. Questions and comments on this reference should be addressed to Peggy Ellis, David Jones or Lucille Roberts at 502-564-3418. REPORT FORMS AND WORKSHEETS This reference contains the most current versions for all disease report forms and worksheets. All forms and worksheets are listed with each disease and should be photocopied from this reference book as needed. (Exceptions as noted.) Report of Verified Case of Tuberculosis (CDC 72.9 A and B) may be obtained by calling the Tuberculosis Control Program: 502-564-4276. Production, printing and distribution of this document funded by the State General Fund and Federal Funds through the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases Grant number CCU414412-05. FOREWORD In the United States, requirements for reporting diseases are mandated by state laws or regulations, and the list of reportable diseases in each state varies. The Kentucky Disease Surveillance Administrative Regulations 902 KAR 2:020 require reporting of communicable disease, unusual disease outbreaks and clusters of diseases to the local health departments and the Kentucky Department for Public Health. Additionally, state health departments report cases of selected diseases to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS), on a weekly basis. These data are published weekly in the Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). An updated final report is published annually in the Summary of Notifiable Diseases. With the 2006 version of the desk reference, we have tried to adhere as closely as possible to the case definitions developed by the CDC and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) published in “Case Definitions for Public Health Surveillance”, MMWR 1997; 46:RR-10 and available on the CDC’s Epidemiology Program Office website, http://www.cdc.gov/epo/dphsi/casedef/index.htm. As uniform case definitions are adopted by the states, the incidence of reported diseases in different geographic areas may be more meaningfully compared at the local, state, and national levels. KYEPHRS AND THE DISEASE SURVEILLANCE MODULE The Kentucky Electronic Public Health Record System (KY-EPHRS) provides the backbone of an integrated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Appendix
    Supplementary appendix Sipilä PN, Heikkilä N, Lindbohm JV, Hakulinen C, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Suominen S, Väänänen A, Koskinen A, Nyberg ST, Pentti J, Strandberg TE, Kivimäki M. Hospital-treated infectious diseases and the risk of incident dementia: multicohort study with replication in the UK Biobank CONTENTS eFigure 1. Selection of participants in the study............................................................................... 2 eMethods 1. Study cohorts and data collection ................................................................................ 3 The Finnish Public Sector study (FPS)......................................................................................... 3 The Health and Social Support study (HeSSup) ........................................................................... 4 The Still Working study (STW) ................................................................................................... 5 The UK Biobank ......................................................................................................................... 5 eMethods 2. Proportionality of hazards ........................................................................................... 7 eFigure 2. Visualisation of hazard ratios over time using exponentiated scaled Schoenfeld residuals ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 eFigure 3. Dementia follow-up .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Diagnosis And
    Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society of the Philippines Journal Vol 16 No.2 pp 2-42 Jul-Dec 2015 PIDSP and CNSP Bacterial Meningitis TWG, Acute Bacterial Meningitis CPG 2015 PHILIPPINE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN Copyright 2015 A joint project of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines (PIDSP) and Child Neurology Society of the Philippines (CNSP) 2 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society of the Philippines Journal Vol 16 No.2 pp.2-42 Jul-Dec 2015 PIDSP and CNSP Bacterial Meningitis TWG, Acute Bacterial Meningitis CPG 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction A. History of the guideline 5 B. Target users of the guideline 5 C. Forming the guideline 5 D. PIDSP/CNSP Steering Committee 6 E. Criteria for Assessment of Strength of Evidence and Recommendation 6 II. Recommendations A. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis 1. What are the signs and symptoms to suspect acute bacterial meningitis? 7 2. What is the definitive test for bacterial meningitis? 8 3. How do we differentiate acute bacterial meningitis from other CNS infections? 9 4. What are the contraindications to lumbar puncture? 9 5. What are the ancillary tests in the diagnosis of bacterial m eningitis? What is the value of each diagnostic test? a. Complete blo od count (CBC) 10 b. Blood culture 11 c. C-reactive protein (CRP) 11 d. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) 13 e. Latex Agglutination Test (LAT) 13 f. Procalcitonin 14 6. What is the role of imaging tests in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis? 15 B.
    [Show full text]
  • General Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease BMS 6301
    General Medical David L. Balkwill, Ph.D., Course Microbiology Director and Infectious Disease [email protected] BMS 6301 (850) 644-9219 2004 – 2005 Course Syllabus x Click here for the schedule Description: This course provides learning opportunities in the basic principles of medical microbiology and infectious disease. It covers mechanisms of infectious disease transmission, principles of aseptic practice, and the role of the human body’s normal microflora. The biology of bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic pathogens and the diseases they cause are covered. Relevant clinical examples are provided. The course provides the conceptual basis for understanding pathogenic microorganisms and the mechanisms by which they cause disease in the human body. It also provides opportunities to develop informatics and diagnostic skills, including the use and interpretation of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Format: Combination of 1-hour lecture/case-based class sessions and 2-hour case-based discussion/demo lab sessions with small groups (see topical syllabus, below). Course Director: David L. Balkwill, Ph.D. Office: Room 526 Office Hours: Open – students are welcome to stop by anytime. Phone: 644-9219 [email protected] Other Instructors: Lecture: Myra Hurt, Ph.D. Small Group Facilitation: Curtis Altmann, Ph.D., Susanne Cappendijk, Ph.D., Trent Clarke, Ph.D., Edward Klatt, M.D., Graham Patrick, Ph.D., and Yanchang Wang, Ph.D. Required Text: Medical Microbiology, 4th Ed. (2002) Murray, Rosenthal, Kobayashi, and Pfaller, Mosby-Year Book, ISBN: 0323012132. Recommended Texts: Mechanisms of Microbial Disease, 3rd Ed. (1998) Schaechter, Engelberg, Eisenstein, and Medoff, Lippincott, ISBN: 0683076051.
    [Show full text]
  • February 1, 2008 May 1, 2010 ABSCESS Staphyloccus Aureus
    Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Infection Prevention & Control Manual Clinical Presentation, Type of Infective Material Route of Incubation Period of Duration of Comments Microorganism, Infectious Precautions Transmission Communicability Precautions Disease ABSCESS Minor: Pus Direct & indirect Variable Duration of drainage Duration of Minor: Drainage is contained by Staphyloccus aureus Routine contact drainage dressing. Group A Streptococcus Major: Drainage not contained by Major: Other bacteria dressing. Contact ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY Routine Blood, body fluids Mucosal or Weeks to From onset of For life Follow the WRHA Post Exposure SYNDROME containing visible percutaneous years infection Blood & Body Fluid Post Exposure AIDS, ARC, or HIV blood, CSF, pleural exposure to Protocol Management Policy. Report an exposure to infective Antibody Positive, peritoneal, infective pericardial, amniotic material material e.g., needle-stick or blood Suspected Human fluids, semen, & Breastmilk spill/splash immediately to the Immunodeficiency vaginal secretions ingestion Occupational Health Department. Virus (HIV) Infection Refer to Specific Disease Protocol: AIDS/HIV. ACTINOMYCOSIS Routine Not person to Normal flora: infection usually Actinomyces species person secondary to trauma. ADENOVIRUS Routine Eye drainage Direct & indirect 2-14 days Until symptoms Duration of Different strains can be responsible for Conjunctivitis Children <6 yrs: contact cease illness respiratory and gastrointestinal disease. Contact Minimize exposure of immunocompromised
    [Show full text]
  • Author Section
    AUTHOR SECTION patients with new onset of fever, demographic, clinical, and laborato- Mycoplasma spp. Overall, the spectrum of antibacterial activity indi- ry variables were obtained during the 2 days after inclusion, while cates a potential role for this combination in the treatment of diffi- microbiological results for a follow-up period of 7 days were collect- cult-to-treat Gram-positive infections, including those caused by ed. Patients were followed up for survival or death, up to a maximum multidrug-resistant organisms. Since this activity extends to Gram- of 28 days after inclusion. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of negative respiratory bacteria, quinupristin/dalfopristin may also find all patients, 95% had SIRS, 44% had sepsis with a microbiologically a role in the treatment of atypical, as well as typical, pneumonia. confirmed infection, and 9% died. A model with a set of variables all significantly (p<0.01) contributing to the prediction of mortality was Boubaker A. et al. [Investigation of the urinary tract in children in nuclear med- derived.The set included the presence of hospital-acquired fever, the icine]. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 2000; 120(3) : 251-7.p Abstract: peak respiratory rate, the nadir score on the Glasgow coma scale, and The early detection of urologic abnormalities by antenatal sonogra- the nadir albumin plasma level within the first 2 days after inclusion. phy has resulted in the investigation of many infants and neonates for This set of variables predicted mortality for febrile patients with suspicion of either obstructive uropathy or reflux nephropathy. microbiologically confirmed infection even better.The predictive val- Nuclear medicine techniques allow to assess renal parenchyma ues for mortality of SIRS and sepsis were less than that of our set of integrity, to detect pyelonephritic scars and to measure absolute and variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningitis Protocol
    Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Acute Care Infection Prevention & Control Manual MENINGITIS PROTOCOL Meningitis is an inflammation of the meninges, the thin lining that surrounds the brain and spinal cord. It can be caused by many bacteria and viruses. Viral infections are the most common cause of meningitis; bacterial infections are the second most common cause. Other rarer causes of meningitis include fungi, parasites, and non-infectious causes, including those related to drugs. Severity of illness and treatment for meningitis differ depending on the cause. It is therefore important to know the specific cause of meningitis: bacterial meningitis is usually more severe than viral, fungal, or parasitic meningitis. Implement Droplet Precautions for all suspect meningitis types until a type has been confirmed/diagnosis determined. Not all cases of meningitis require Additional Precautions. Pediatric: • Implement Droplet/Contact Precautions until etiology determined. • If confirmed as bacterial in origin, implement Droplet Precautions. • If confirmed as viral in origin, implement Contact Precautions for children who are incontinent or unable to comply with hygiene practice. Adult: implement Droplet Precautions until Neisseria meningitidis ruled out. Type of Type of Meningitis Duration of Precautions Precautions Etiology unknown – adult Droplet Until etiology is determined Etiology unknown – pediatric Droplet/Contact Haemophilus influenzae Routine Practices Ongoing type B – adult Haemophilus influenzae Until 24 hours after Droplet type
    [Show full text]
  • Haemophilus Influenzae Type B (Hib) Meningitis in the Pre-Vaccine Era: a Global Review of Incidence, Age Distributions, and Case-Fatality Rates
    WHO/V&B/02.18 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Vaccines and Biologicals Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) meningitis in the pre-vaccine era: a global review of incidence, age distributions, and case-fatality rates World Health Organization WHO WHO/V&B/02.18 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Vaccines and Biologicals Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) meningitis in the pre-vaccine era: a global review of incidence, age distributions, and case-fatality rates John V. Bennett, Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Alexander E. Platonov, Head, Laboratory of Meningococcal Infection and Bacterial Meningitis, Central Institute of Epidemiology, Moscow, Russian Federation Mary P. E. Slack, Head, WHO Collaborating Centre on Haemophilus influenzae, Public Health Laboratory Service Haemophilus Reference Unit, Oxford, United Kingdom Peter Mala, Anthony H. Burton and Susan E. Robertson, Department of Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland World Health Organization WHO The Department of Vaccines and Biologicals thanks the donors whose unspecified financial support has made the production of this document possible. This document was produced by the Vaccine Assessment and Monitoring team of the Department of Vaccines and Biologicals Ordering code: WHO/V&B/02.18 Printed: October 2002 This document is available on the Internet at: www.who.int/vaccines-documents/ Copies may be requested from: World Health Organization Department of Vaccines and Biologicals CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland • Fax: + 41 22 791 4227 • Email: [email protected] • © World Health Organization 2002 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Meningitis, Encephalitis and Neonatal Sepsis 1 GBD 2017 1 WHO
    The global burden of meningitis in children: Challenges with interpreting global health estimates Supplementary Appendix Contents Mortality modelling methods – Meningitis, encephalitis and neonatal sepsis 1 GBD 2017 1 WHO-MCEE 2000-2017 3 Pathogen specific meningitis mortality and incidence modelling methods 4 GBD 2017 4 MCEE/JHSPH 5 Tables and Figures Table S1: ICD10 codes mapped to meningitis, encephalitis and neonatal sepsis according to model 7 Table S2: Definitions of IHME’s GBD 2017 data quality star rating 12 Table S3: Location level covariates according to model 13 Table S4: Covariates used in WHO-MCEE’s multinomial logistic regression by age group, model and cause 14 Table S5: MCEE Final cause of death list 15 Table S6: MCEE modelled cause of death categories according to age 16 Figure S1: Quality of underlying cause of death data and modelling methods used to generate death estimates according to model. 17 Mortality modelling methods – Meningitis, encephalitis and neonatal sepsis This section provides a brief overview on how the different models derive meningitis, encephalitis and neonatal sepsis mortality estimates. However, full methodology is provided by the modellers elsewhere. Both GBD 2017 and MCEE 2000-2017 models used cause of death data from vital registration (VR) systems, sample registration systems (SR) and verbal autopsy (VA) studies to assign causes of death ensuring that the total number of deaths matches other estimates for the age-specific all-cause mortality. This involves the generation of data where data are The global burden of meningitis in children: Challenges with interpreting global health estimates Supplementary Appendix incomplete or completely missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Meningitis Some Aspects of Diagnosis and Treatment GARRY HAMBLETON and PAMELA A
    Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.50.9.674 on 1 September 1975. Downloaded from Review article Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1975, 50, 674. Bacterial meningitis Some aspects of diagnosis and treatment GARRY HAMBLETON and PAMELA A. DAVIES From the Department of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London Antimicrobial therapy has made few more drama- the male sex (Washburn, Medearis, and Childs, tic conquests than that of bacterial meningitis, 1965), congenital anomalies of or injury to the which it has transformed from the almost univer- central nervous system, and primary infection else- sally fatal illness of 30 years ago into one with a where, especially that adjacent to the meninges, are relatively low mortality. Yet the disease, which has other well established predisposing factors. Chil- its greatest impact in early childhood, poses a dren who have impaired defence mechanisms for a continuing threat and must be regarded as one of variety of reasons are a tiny minority but are never- the most challenging of medical emergencies. In the less being kept alive in increasing numbers for the United Kingdom and Eire in 1973, at least 109 much longer now, and are consequently in jeopardy. children under 15 years of age were reported to For instance, an association between pneumococcal have died from it (Public Health Laboratory Service, infection and sickle cell disease, a condition which 1974;) andinthe United States more thana quarter of may be associated with a defect in the properdin copyright. survivors from Haemophilus influenzae meningitis system (Johnston, Newman, and Struth, 1973) is alonehave beenfound tohave significantneurological well known, and Smith et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningococcal Disease: Always Consider in a Patient with Flu-Like Illness
    Meningococcal disease: Always consider in a patient with flu-like illness Patients with meningococcal disease can initially year (19.8 per 100 000 population), followed by children aged present with non-specific influenza-like symptoms. between one and four years (5.6 per 100 000 population).4 More specific signs and symptoms may develop There was a secondary peak in notification rate in young adults 4 as the illness progresses. Symptoms can rapidly aged 15–19 years (4.8 per 100 000 population). Among ethnic groups, the highest rate of meningococcal disease in 2012 progress from mild to life-threatening, therefore was in Māori (4.5 per 100 000 population), followed by Pacific suspected meningococcal disease is a medical peoples (3.7 per 100 000 population).4 This compares to a rate emergency. of 1.5 per 100 000 population in people of European or other ethnicity.4 Meningococcal disease is the term used to describe the two different types of illness caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis: meningococcal meningitis and Identifying meningococcal disease in a patient with a meningococcal septicaemia.1 Meningococcal meningitis “flu-like” illness occurs when N. meningitidis multiplies on the meninges The first stage of meningococcal disease (prodromal stage) and in the cerebro-spinal fluid. Meningococcal septicaemia is associated with non-specific symptoms, which may persist occurs when N. meningitidis multiplies to pathogenic levels throughout the illness. These symptoms include acute fever, in the bloodstream.2 Septicaemia can occur in conjunction vomiting, nausea, lethargy, irritability, refusing food or drink, with meningitis, and is more likely to be fatal than meningitis headache, muscle and joint pain and respiratory symptoms.5 without septicaemia.3 Cough, particularly dry cough, is more indicative of influenza than meningococcal disease.6 There are at least 13 serotypes of N.
    [Show full text]
  • House Bill 420
    HOUSE BILL 420 Unofficial Copy 2001 Regular Session J1 1lr0076 ____________________________________________________________________________________ By: Chairman, Environmental Matters Committee (Departmental - Health and Mental Hygiene) Introduced and read first time: February 1, 2001 Assigned to: Environmental Matters _____________________________________________________________________________________ Committee Report: Favorable House action: Adopted Read second time: March 7, 2001 _____________________________________________________________________________________ CHAPTER_______ 1 AN ACT concerning 2 Reporting of Communicable Diseases 3 FOR the purpose of adding certain diseases to a list of diseases that are reportable by 4 a director of a medical laboratory to a certain health officer within a specified 5 period of time; modifying the existing designations of diseases on the list; 6 defining invasive disease; providing an exemption for a report of noncholera 7 vibriosis under certain circumstances; and generally relating to the reporting of 8 certain diseases by medical laboratories. 9 BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 10 Article - Health - General 11 Section 18-205 12 Annotated Code of Maryland 13 (2000 Replacement Volume) 14 (As enacted by Chapter 419 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2000) 15 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 16 MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 17 Article - Health - General 18 18-205. 19 (A) IN THIS SECTION, "INVASIVE DISEASE" MEANS A DISEASE IN WHICH AN 20 ORGANISM IS DETECTED IN A SPECIMEN TAKEN FROM A NORMALLY STERILE BODY 21 SITE. 2 HOUSE BILL 420 1 [(a) (1)] (B) The director of a medical laboratory shall submit a report to the 2 health officer for the county where the laboratory is located within 48 hours after an 3 examination of a specimen from a human body shows evidence of any of the following: 4 [(i) Gonorrhea.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruction for Classifying the Underlying Cause of Death
    ICD­10­Mortality Manual 2a ­ 2014 SECTION I ­ INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLASSIFYING THE UNDERLYING CAUSE OF DEATH, 2014 A. INTRODUCTION This manual provides instructions to mortality medical coders and nosologists for coding the underlying cause of death from death certificates filed in the states. These mortality coding instructions are used by both the State vital statistics programs and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), which is the Federal agency responsible for the compilation of U.S. statistics on causes of death. NCHS is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In coding causes of death, NCHS adheres to the World Health Organization Nomenclature Regulations specified in the most recent revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). NCHS also uses the ICD international rules for selecting the underlying cause of death for primary mortality tabulation in accordance with the international rules. Beginning with deaths occurring in 1999, the Tenth Revision of the ICD (ICD­10) is being used for coding and classifying causes of death. This revision of the Classification is published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and consists of three volumes. Volume 1 contains a list of three­character categories, the tabular list of inclusions and the four­character subcategories. The supplementary Z code appears in Volume 1 but is not used for classifying mortality data. Optional fifth characters are provided for certain categories and an optional independent four­character coding system is provided to classify histological varieties of neoplasms, prefixed by the letter M (for morphology) and followed by a fifth character indicating behavior.
    [Show full text]