DOCSLIB.ORG

Erider™ Field Test Final Report July 3, 2014 Revised October 10, 2014 Revised March 25, 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Erider™ Field Test Final Report July 3, 2014 Revised October 10, 2014 Revised March 25, 2015 eRider™ Field Test Final Report July 3, 2014 Revised October 10, 2014 Revised March 25, 2015 Prepared By Pat Hahn, TEAM OREGON Communications Manager For TEAM OREGON Motorcycle Safety Program TEAM OREGON eRider™ Field Test Final Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Objective ............................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Executive Report ................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 6 A. TEAM OREGON ................................................................................................................................. 6 Mandatory Training .............................................................................................................................. 6 B. TEAM OREGON Basic Rider Training Curriculum 1984-Present ....................................................... 8 5. eRider™ vs. BRT Classroom ................................................................................................................... 9 A. eRider™ Development and Curriculum Overview ............................................................................ 9 B. Curriculum Template ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Curriculum Development Process ................................................................................................... 10 D. Proof-of-Concept (Chapters 1-2b) Field Test Results ..................................................................... 13 E. Curriculum Overview ...................................................................................................................... 14 Learning Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 14 6. The eRider™ Field Test ........................................................................................................................ 15 A. Design and Modifications ............................................................................................................... 15 B. Marketing ........................................................................................................................................ 19 C. Registration and Troubleshooting .................................................................................................. 19 D. Data Collection and Analysis ........................................................................................................... 21 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 21 Curriculum Comparison ...................................................................................................................... 22 E. Survey Results ................................................................................................................................. 22 Student End-of-Course Evaluations .................................................................................................... 22 Student Post-then-Pre-Course Surveys............................................................................................... 26 Survey Results – Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 28 F. Student and Instructor Feedback.................................................................................................... 28 Online Student Comments .................................................................................................................. 28 Instructor Surveys ............................................................................................................................... 30 2 Copyright © 2014 TEAM OREGON Motorcycle Safety Program. Do not reproduce without permission. TEAM OREGON eRider™ Field Test Final Report G. Pass Rates, Knowledge and Skill Test Results ................................................................................. 31 Field Tests 1 and 2 ............................................................................................................................... 31 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Pass Rates............................................................................................................................................ 33 BRT Knowledge Test (BRT and ONB) ................................................................................................... 35 Online Quizzes (ONB and ONI) ............................................................................................................ 36 Skill Test (BRT, ONB, IRT, ONI) ............................................................................................................ 38 Pass Rates, Knowledge and Skill Test Results – Conclusions .............................................................. 38 7. Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 39 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 39 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 41 8. List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................... 41 3 Copyright © 2014 TEAM OREGON Motorcycle Safety Program. Do not reproduce without permission. TEAM OREGON eRider™ Field Test Final Report 1. Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide detail on the background and development of the eRider™ online classroom, its field test design and protocol, the field test results and recommendations. 2. Objective The objective of the field test was to compare the eRider™ online classroom to the Basic Rider Training (BRT) classroom to determine its suitability as an approved classroom option for TEAM OREGON beginning and intermediate rider training students. The field test also measured how well each curriculum addresses the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Model National Standards for Entry-Level Motorcycle Rider Training and TEAM OREGON priority areas. 3. Executive Report TEAM OREGON has a strong history of developing effective motorcycle rider training curricula, designing the BRT classroom in 2003 and BRT range in 2004 – both are approved by Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for a motorcycle endorsement testing waiver. TEAM OREGON developed Intermediate Rider Training (IRT) shortly thereafter, which is also a course approved by ODOT for a skill test waiver. TEAM OREGON also developed Advanced Rider Training (ART), Police ART, Police High-Speed and Rider Skills Practice (RSP) to meet the various needs of Oregon motorcycle riders. In 2010-2014, to better meet the needs of Oregon riders and to address the newly published Model National Standards for Entry Level Rider Training, TEAM OREGON developed and field tested the eRider™ online classroom. eRider™ is not a redesign of any existing curricula – it was created brand new from the ground up. The curriculum topics are informed by the National Standards, with extra emphasis placed on TEAM OREGON priority areas. As part of the eRider™ field test, TEAM OREGON conducted an analysis and comparison of eRider™ and BRT curricula to measure how well each addresses the National Standards. In the final tally, eRider™ exceeds BRT – the National Standards are addressed 633 times by eRider™ and 538 times by BRT. When BRT range exercises are taken into account, eRider™ addresses every standard in the National Standards. The eRider™ curriculum focuses heavily on eight curriculum priority areas based on needs of Oregon riders: 4 Copyright © 2014 TEAM OREGON Motorcycle Safety Program. Do not reproduce without permission. TEAM OREGON eRider™ Field Test Final Report • Risk awareness • Riding strategy • Scanning • Cornering and vehicle control skills • Judgment • Impairment • Riding gear • Group riding The comparison of eRider™ and BRT to the National Standards also demonstrated that eRider™ exceeds BRT in addressing TEAM OREGON curriculum priority areas by a margin of 34-50 percent. TEAM OREGON conducted two eRider™ field tests to evaluate effectiveness. The first showed slightly lower pass rates and knowledge test scores, so the curriculum was modified for a second field test. The second field test showed no difference in pass rates and test scores. This report combines the results of both field tests. The field test design focused on student outcomes, comparing the online classroom and range to those of the traditional classroom and range. In all, 1,086 basic and intermediate students participated in the field test – 440 in the beta group and 646 in the control group.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 Oregon State Football Media Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 2017 OREGON STATE FOOTBALL MEDIA GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS .................1 THE COACHES ..................80-97 SERIES RECORDS ............. 176-180 ON THE COVER - Front: Manase Hungalu Gary Andersen ..................80-82 Composite Series Records .........176 (left) and Ryan Nall. Back (clockwise from MEDIA INFORMATION ..............2-7 Assistant Coaches ..............83-91 top): Gus Lavaka, Kalani Vakameilalo, Xavi- Communications Staff Info...........2 BOWL GAME HISTORY ..........181-196 Support Staff. .92-97 er Crawford and Bright Ugwoegbu. Future Schedules ....................2 PLAYER ACCOLADES ..........197-204 Media/Credential Information ........3 2016 REVIEW ..................98-107 CREDITS: Content by Steve Fenk, Jason Television/Radio Info .................4 Season Statistics ..............98-109 ALL-AMERICANS ..............205-212 Amberg and Hank Hager. Beaver Sports Radio Network ........5 Game Summaries ..............110-115 TERRY BAKER SALUTE ............ 213 Layout and design by Jason Amberg. OSU Social Media ....................5 LETTERWINNERS LOST .........116-131 Department Contact Info .............6 BEAVERS IN THE PROS ........214-221 Editing by Steve Fenk, Jason Amberg and Hank Hager. Quick Facts ..........................7 RECORDS .....................132-158 LETTERWINNERS LIST .......222-228 Yearly Leaders .....................132 Pronunciation Guide ..................7 Cover design by Russell Houghtaling. Individual Records ............133-149 BEYOND FOOTBALL ...........230-231 2017 ROSTERS
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Preparation, Consultation, and Coordination
    Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 5 Preparation, Consultation, and Coordination Contents Project Management Team....................................................................................................................... 2 EIS Team Members .................................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Support ............................................................................................................................ 6 Document Production............................................................................................................................... 6 Communications Team ............................................................................................................................. 6 GIS/Spatial Analysis Team ......................................................................................................................... 7 Science Advisory Group ............................................................................................................................ 7 Other Contributors ................................................................................................................................... 9 Agencies and Organizations Contacted ................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 5: Consultation and Coordination List of Preparers This
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
    CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SALEM, OREGON Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Prepared by: Budget and Finance Department This page intentionally left blank Chemeketa Community College-Proposed Budget 2020-2021 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chemeketa Vision, Mission, Core Themes and Values ............................................................................... 7 President’s Budget Message ....................................................................................................................... 8 Statement of Budget Principles ..................................................................................................................11 Budget Committee .....................................................................................................................................13 Chemeketa Student and District Information .............................................................................................14 Budget Summary-Highlights ......................................................................................................................19 Budget Calendar ........................................................................................................................................27 General Fund Organizational Budgets .......................................................................................................29 General Fund Resources ...........................................................................................................................30 General Fund
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-07-09 GAC MS DRAFT Meeting Minutes
    GOVERNOR’S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MOTORCYCLE SAFETY DRAFT Thursday, July 9, 2020, Meeting Minutes Transportation Safety Division Teleconference Meeting Public Access: 503-934-3605 Pin: 637306 Members Present: Chris Henry, Don Hamon, CJ Strauss, Cathy Steele, Graham Munsell (via phone only), Ethan Lodwig (via phone only), Debbie Weber Members Absent: Peter Russell Staff: Jeff Greiner, Troy Costales, Traci Pearl, Alycen Ozawa Liaisons/Guests: Cassie Bay (ODOT Driver and Motor Vehicles), Sgt. Jason Lindland (Oregon State Police), Sgt. Bret Barnum (Portland Police Bureau), Aria Minu-Sepehr (Team Oregon) I. Welcome and Introductions Chair Chris Henry called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Chair Henry introduced Troy Costales. Mr. Costales announced meeting instructions for members, liaisons, and guests. Roll call of introductions. II. Approval of Minutes for Previous Meetings (February and April) Chair Henry called for a review of the February 6, 2020 meeting minutes. MOTION: Mr. Munsell moved to approve the GAC-MS meeting minutes of February 6, 2020 as presented. Ms. Weber seconded. Call for vote; unanimous. Motion passed. Chair Henry called for a review of the April 16, 2020 meeting minutes. Mr. Hamon moved to approve the GAC-MS meeting minutes of April 16, 2020 as presented. Ms. Weber seconded. Call for vote; unanimous. Motion passed. III. Chair and Committee Member Reports Chair Report Chair Henry attended the OTSC meeting on July 8, 2020. The Team Oregon tuition increase recommendations by the GAC-MS and Transportation Safety Division (TSD) were presented to the members. The OTSC had unanimous approval of the Team Oregon tuition increase. There were questions as to why there were dissenting votes and an explanation was given that they do not write opposition reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcing the International Sports Boycott of South Africa at Oregon State University; News Clippings from the Struggle, 1980-1982
    Enforcing the International Sports Boycott of South Africa At Oregon State University; News Clippings from the Struggle, 1980-1982 I U St I - - Compiled by Ed Ferguson History Department (1979-1991) Oregon State University -- -r Corvallis, Oregon - r- 4 4 I I ii Introd uction ii This is a booklet of news clippings and other pertinent material from the struggle to enforce the international sports boycott of South Africa at Oregon State University from 1980 through 1982. The struggle took place because of campus sporting ties with apartheid South Africa that violated the international ban on sports with that country ruled by a white-minority regime. Hence, it involved educating students, the local community and others throughout the state about the South African system of racial domination and oppression called "apartheid." Oregon press items in this booklet are primarily from the campus Daily Barometer and the local Gazette-Times. There is also material from other newspapers in the state: the Oregonian, the (Salem) Statesman- Journal, the (Eugene) Register-Guard, the Portland Observer, the (Roseburg) News-Review, the Redmond Spokesman, the (Prineville) Central Oregonian and the Blue Mountain Eagle published in John Day. The African Students' Association led the campus movement which IJreceived the strong support of Sally Duhaime of the Daily Barometer whose writings were of the highest quality. The campaign brought plays and prominent anti-apartheid speakers to campus, as well, so ' these activities will be found in these news clippings. This booklet is a component of "The Oregon Anti-Apartheid Files", a much larger collection of material from the statewide anti-apartheid movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Map Economic Development
    E XPANSION/AD VANCE MENT (OMEP) Local City Economic Development Staff (NWHPEC) MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY Mid-Willamette (MWVCOG) ES Performance High COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RC Oregon Business (MERIT) U Team Oregon Consortium Enterprise Oregon ManufacturingExtension Partnership O Consortium Enterprise (MWVCOG) S Mid-Willamette Valley RE Worksystems Inc. / Council of Governments S Performance High Northwest W e MWVCOG is a voluntary association of over N O IO Grow Santiam R T K 40 governments, including Marion, Polk, and A McMinnville Economic Initiatives, and Training F IZ Development Partnership O Yamhill counties; 32 cities; 5 special districts; and the N (MEDP) Micro Enterprise Resources, R A C Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde. Our ongoing G Incite Works E R PLANNING D mission includes: expanding interaction and improving O E T V BUSINESS / MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY E dialogue among local units of government; enhancing N L E O collective awareness of major regional issues; coordinating M P P SITE LOCATION / ACQUISITION M O regional planning and development activities; and L Strategic Economic E N E Development Salem-Keizer providing technical assistance and local services tailored V Corporation MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY EXPORT / IMPORT (CTEC) T E (SEDCOR) STRATEGIES MARKET O to needs of our member governments. D Career & Technical R C Education Center G I PERMITS AND PROCESSING A M N O IZ N A O INDUSTRY SKILLS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATION T MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY BUSINESS TRANSITION PLANNING C I COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS E O N PRODUCT INNOVATION/DEVELOPMENT PRODUCT SUPPLY CHAIN OPTIMIZATION Mid-Willamette Valley QUALITY SYSTEMS / OPS EXCELLENCE S Council of Governments MARKET RESEARCH & PUBLICATION ON THE JOB TRAINING / (OMEP) R (MWVCOG) Oregon Manufacturing E CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT / ORG.INDUSTRY DEV SKILLS DEVELOPMENT S Extension Partnership O BUSINESS EXPANSION / RETENTION U R C E Help with growing INVESTMENTS IN WORKFORCE DEV.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a PDF of Garets' CV
    STEPHEN B. GARETS Business Address Garets Consulting LLC P.O. Box 2699 Corvallis,THIS OR 97339 541/760-2833 ShippingCOPY Address: 29692 Main Street Shedd, OR 97377 [email protected] http://garetsconsulting.com/ BUSINESS OBJECTIVE Provide expertise and guidanceNOT relating to safe motorcycle operation, including motorcycle handling dynamics, operator behavior and standard of care, accident analysis, rider education and training, operator licensing and research. Provide guidance on affecting public policy, program administration andIMPLY assessment, promoting stakeholder involvement, improved communication and team building. PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND RETENTION DIRECTOR May 1984 – June 2016 TEAM OREGON Motorcycle Safety Program, Oregon State University (OSU) TEAM OREGON is Oregon’s statewide motorcycle safety program, administered by OSU under contract to the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The enterprise consists of a network of 24 training locations with more than 200 active instructors. Approximately 11,000 students annually complete one of TEAM OREAGREEMENTGON’s courses to learn safe and responsible motorcycling. Training programs available to the public are courses for beginning, intermediate, experienced and advanced motorcyclists. TEAM OREGON also offers courses for advanced police motorcycle operation and safety. For more information, visit http://team-oregon.org Administer statewide motorcycle safety programs: Develop and/or approve rider training curricula for statewide use Administer sponsor and instructor
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 OREGON STATE FOOTBALL MEDIA GUIDE 1 #Gobeavs 2015
    TTABLEABLE OFOF CONTENTSCONTENTS 2015 OREGON STATE FOOTBALL MEDIA GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS . 1 THE COACHES . .80-89 BOWL GAME HISTORY . .185-200 ON THE COVER - Front: Storm Woods, Gary Andersen . .80-83 Josh Mitchell and Larry Scott. Inside MEDIA INFORMATION . 2-7 PLAYER ACCOLADES . .201-208 Assistant Coaches . .84-95 Gary Andersen. Val- Communications Staff Info . 2 Front: Inside Back: Support Staff . 96-101 ALL-AMERICANS . .209-216 ley Football Center renderings. Se- Future Schedules . 2 Back: niors. Media/Credential Information . 3 2014 REVIEW . 102-123 TERRY BAKER SALUTE . .217 Television/Radio Info . 4 Season Statistics . 102-111 Content by Steve Fenk and Ja- BEAVERS IN THE PROS . .218-225 CREDITS: Beaver Sports Radio Network . 5 Game Summaries . .112-123 son Amberg. OSU Social Media . 5 LETTERWINNERS LIST . 226-232 LETTERWINNERS LOST . 124-137 Layout and design by Jason Amberg. Department Contact Info . .6 BEYOND FOOTBALL . 233 Quick Facts . 7 RECORDS . 138-165 Editing by Steve Fenk and Jason Amberg. Individual Records . 138-154 RESER STADIUM / Pronunciation Guide . 7 Cover design by Ben Little. Reser Stadium Records . .155 FACILITIES . 234-235 2015 ROSTERS . 8-11 Team Records . .156-159 Printing by Lynx Group, Inc. in Salem, Ore. Alphabetical Roster . 8-9 ADMINISTRATION . 236-238 Opponent Records . 160 Numerical Roster . 8-9 Special thanks to Kip Carlson, Hal Cowan, Bowl Records . .161-163 PAC-12 STORY . 239 Roster Breakdowns . 10-11 Michelle Woodard, Cindy Arbelbide, Matt All-Time Coaching Records . .164 COMPOSITE PAC-12 Derhalli, Caleb Hawley, Ryan McCall, Lau- PLAYER PROFILES . .12-79 Attendance Records . .165 SCHEDULE / STANDINGS . 240 ren Pullen, Nathan Sarles, Derek Senger, Returning Players .
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022
    CHEMEKETA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SALEM, OREGON Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Prepared by: Budget and Finance Department This page intentionally left blank Chemeketa Community College-Proposed Budget 2021-2022 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chemeketa Vision, Mission, Core Themes and Values ............................................................................... 7 President’s Budget Message ....................................................................................................................... 8 Statement of Budget Principles ..................................................................................................................11 Budget Committee .....................................................................................................................................13 Chemeketa Student and District Information .............................................................................................14 Budget Summary-Highlights ......................................................................................................................19 Budget Calendar ........................................................................................................................................27 General Fund Organizational Budgets .......................................................................................................29 General Fund Resources ...........................................................................................................................30 General Fund
    [Show full text]
  • Promising Practices in Motorcycle Rider Education and Licensing
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Motorcycle rider education provides an opportunity for novice riders to learn the basic skills necessary to operate a motorcycle safely and for experienced riders to refresh and refine their techniques. Although 47 States have State-legislated motorcycle rider education and all States and the District of Columbia require operators to obtain a motorcycle license or endorsement, standards and practices for rider education and licensing vary widely across the country. The purpose of this report is to develop a research-based model of promising practices in rider education and licensing and to use the model to identify States that have implemented high-quality rider training and comprehensive licensing. In addition, drawing on detailed data collected from State motorcycle rider education administrators, instructors, and students, the report describes specific actions that programs in five highlighted promising-practices States (Delaware, Idaho, Maryland, Nevada, and Oregon) have taken that promote the effective training and licensing of motorcycle operators. The promising-practices model and the specific recommendations can serve as a guide for other States interested in improving their rider training and licensing programs. Promising Practices in Rider Education and Licensing The model of promising practices in rider education and licensing was developed on the basis of a review of current research and position papers published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Thirteen practices were identified and organized within three broad areas: program administration, rider education, and licensing. Program administration refers to the structure and organization of a jurisdiction’s rider education and licensing activities. Practices related to rider education concern the details of delivering training efficiently and effectively to motorcycle operators.
    [Show full text]
  • TEAM Oregon GAC Report April 2020
    Team Oregon Motorcycle Safety Program Oregon State University 3550 SW Deschutes St. Corvallis, Oregon 97333 P 541-737-2459 team-oregon.org TO: Governor’s Advisory Committee on Motorcycle Safety (GAC-MS) FROM: Aria Minu-Sepehr, Director SUBJECT: April 2020 Report All Team Oregon in-person training has been postponed until state restrictions are lifted. All staff are working remotely. The Training Support Unit (TSU) is busy converting all in-person classroom to eRider and rescheduling displaced students. Training, Operations and Communications continue to execute business plans and prepare for training to resume. 1. Through March 31 (all training was postponed after March 15), 962 students took a basic or intermediate course, a drop of 28 percent in endorsement-seeking students from the previous year. 441 participants took Basic Rider Training 241 participants took eRider® Basic 141 participants took Intermediate Rider Training 139 participants took eRider® Intermediate The projected number of endorsement-seeking students in 2020 before statewide postponement of training was 9,836. 2. Operations, Facilities, and Equipment: The Operations team will soon begin site prep at the new North Portland/ODOT Region I location including container placement, training bike install and range paint. The team continues to negotiate for Bend and Roseburg replacement sites. A replacement range has been secured in Pendleton. The team painted the first of two replacement ranges at Chemeketa Community College and is coordinating with the sponsor for the second range paint as soon as possible. A replacement range has been painted at Treasure Valley Community College in Ontario due to degraded asphalt on the former range.
    [Show full text]
  • Promising Practices in Motorcycle Rider Education and Licensing
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Motorcycle rider education provides an opportunity for novice riders to learn the basic skills necessary to operate a motorcycle safely and for experienced riders to refresh and refine their techniques. Although 47 States have State-legislated motorcycle rider education and all States and the District of Columbia require operators to obtain a motorcycle license or endorsement, standards and practices for rider education and licensing vary widely across the country. The purpose of this report is to develop a research-based model of promising practices in rider education and licensing and to use the model to identify States that have implemented high-quality rider training and comprehensive licensing. In addition, drawing on detailed data collected from State motorcycle rider education administrators, instructors, and students, the report describes specific actions that programs in five highlighted promising-practices States (Delaware, Idaho, Maryland, Nevada, and Oregon) have taken that promote the effective training and licensing of motorcycle operators. The promising-practices model and the specific recommendations can serve as a guide for other States interested in improving their rider training and licensing programs. Promising Practices in Rider Education and Licensing The model of promising practices in rider education and licensing was developed on the basis of a review of current research and position papers published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Thirteen practices were identified and organized within three broad areas: program administration, rider education, and licensing. Program administration refers to the structure and organization of a jurisdiction’s rider education and licensing activities. Practices related to rider education concern the details of delivering training efficiently and effectively to motorcycle operators.
    [Show full text]