61 Part 121—Operating Require
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Nation of Aviation Pioneers
ICAO TIE-INS By Albert Pelsser Romania - A nation of aviation pioneers At the beginning of the 20th century, Romania was among the few nations in the world which brought essential contributions to aviation and flying because there were people who dedicated their life and work to fulfilling the human desire to fly and developing aviation. Among the most well-known inventors who contributed to the flight development by means of apparatuses heavier than the air, Traian Vuia, Aurel Vlaicu and Henri Coanda played a distinct role. In parallel to the above developments, schools of piloting were established and airships from other countries were purchased, with provision for specially designed workshops for the maintenance and repairing of aircraft. The first school of piloting was initiated by the Romanian lawyer Mihail Cerchez, after his return from Paris in the summer of 1909. It started its activity in the spring of 1910, on the field near Chitila, where the first aerodrome of the Romanian aviation was settled. Once the infrastructure for the construction and repair of the airships had been completed, Mihail Cerchez purchased four aircraft from France: two biplane Farman aircraft that were intended to carrying out the training flights of the future pilots, one Demoiselle aircraft and a Wright aircraft for the ground instruction. Second Lieutenants Ştefan Protopopescu and Gheorghe Negrescu were among the first six military pilots trained. Cerchez also obtained that the Farman aircraft be assembled in his workshops. Chitila’s infrastructure in 1911. Farman IV biplane. Having obtained their Pilot Licences in July 2011, Protopopescu and Negrescu, along with other pilots, participated in military maneuvers on Farmans in the fall of 1911 and carried out a series of raids to popularize aviation among youth and to maintain a high degree of readiness among pilots. -
Concorde Is a Museum Piece, but the Allure of Speed Could Spell Success
CIVIL SUPERSONIC Concorde is a museum piece, but the allure Aerion continues to be the most enduring player, of speed could spell success for one or more and the company’s AS2 design now has three of these projects. engines (originally two), the involvement of Air- bus and an agreement (loose and non-exclusive, by Nigel Moll but signed) with GE Aviation to explore the supply Fourteen years have passed since British Airways of those engines. Spike Aerospace expects to fly a and Air France retired their 13 Concordes, and for subsonic scale model of the design for the S-512 the first time in the history of human flight, air trav- Mach 1.5 business jet this summer, to explore low- elers have had to settle for flying more slowly than speed handling, followed by a manned two-thirds- they used to. But now, more so than at any time scale supersonic demonstrator “one-and-a-half to since Concorde’s thunderous Olympus afterburn- two years from now.” Boom Technology is working ing turbojets fell silent, there are multiple indi- on a 55-seat Mach 2.2 airliner that it plans also to cations of a supersonic revival, and the activity offer as a private SSBJ. NASA and Lockheed Martin appears to be more advanced in the field of busi- are encouraged by their research into reducing the ness jets than in the airliner sector. severity of sonic booms on the surface of the planet. www.ainonline.com © 2017 AIN Publications. All Rights Reserved. For Reprints go to Shaping the boom create what is called an N-wave sonic boom: if The sonic boom produced by a supersonic air- you plot the pressure distribution that you mea- craft has long shaped regulations that prohibit sure on the ground, it looks like the letter N. -
Customer Guidance for Ferry / Test Flight Handling
Customer Guidance for Ferry / Test flight Handling Customer Service Boeing Shanghai 1 COPYRIGHT © 2010 BOEING SHANGHAI AVIATION SERVICES CO., LTD. Important Notice Important Notice to Customer about Aircraft Input/output PVG procedure Please send the Landing / Departure flight application to CAAC Beijing ATC at least (Five) 5 working days in advance with all necessary information and copy to Boeing Shanghai Customer Service. Please forward the flight permit granted by CAAC ATC to Boeing Shanghai for aircraft customs clearance purpose. All flight crew on board MUST hold “C” or “F” or “M” visa. All technical crew on board MUST hold “F” or “M” visa. Boeing Shanghai can assist Customer in issuing invitation letter upon request. Please fill in the attached Form Comm 001 of Aircraft Information for CIQ declaration purpose and send it to Boeing Shanghai Customer Service at least (Five) 5 working days before the aircraft delivery. Please forward the On – Site Representatives’ passport copies, prior to their arrival, to Boeing Shanghai Customer Service for Entry Permit preparation. COPYRIGHT © 2010 BOEING SHANGHAI AVIATION SERVICES CO., LTD. Important Notice Cont’ Ramp Permit The apron outside of Boeing Shanghai hangar is secured by Shanghai Airport Security Office. Anyone wants to access to aircraft of outside hangar is requested to hold a ramp permit. To get ramp permit, it is necessary for people to have an interview in the Security Office with holding passport , non-criminal statement and company badge. Normally it takes 3 working days to get the permit. For the non- criminal statement, it should be issued by police office or government officials, and notarized by Chinese embassy / consulate; it is also acceptable if it is issued by the foreign embassy / consulate in China. -
The Economics of the UK Aerospace Industry: a Transaction Cost Analysis
The economics of the UK aerospace industry: A transaction cost analysis of defence and civilian firms Ian Jackson PhD Department of Economics and Related Studies University of York 2004 Abstract The primaryaim of this thesisis to assessvertical integration in the UK aerospace industrywith a transactioncost approach. There is an extensivetheoretical and conceptualliterature on transactioncosts, but a relativelack of empiricalwork. This thesisapplies transaction cost economics to the UK aerospaceindustry focusing on the paradigmproblem of the make-or-buydecision and related contract design. It assesses whetherthe transactioncost approachis supported(or rejected)by evidencefrom an originalsurvey of theUK aerospaceindustry. The centralhypothesis is that UK aerospacefirms are likely to makecomponents in- housedue to higherlevels of assetspecificity, uncertainty, complexity, frequency and smallnumbers, which is reflectedin contractdesign. The thesismakes these concepts operational.The empiricalmethodology of the thesisis basedon questionnairesurvey dataand econometric tests using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) andlogit regressions to analysethe make-or-buy decision and the choiceof contracttype. The resultsfrom this thesisfind limited evidencein supportof the transactioncost approachapplied to the UK aerospaceindustry, in spiteof a bespokedataset. The empiricaltests of verticalintegration for both make-or-buyand contracttype as the dependentvariable yield insufficientevidence to concludethat the transactioncost approachis an appropriateframework -
Make America Boom Again: How to Bring Back Supersonic Transport,” Eli Dourado and Samuel Hammond Show That It Is Time to Revisit the Ban
MAKE AMERICA BOOM AGAIN How to Bring Back Supersonic Transport _____________________ In 1973, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) banned civil supersonic flight over the United States, stymieing the development of a supersonic aviation industry. In “Make America Boom Again: How to Bring Back Supersonic Transport,” Eli Dourado and Samuel Hammond show that it is time to revisit the ban. Better technology—including better materials, engines, and simulation capabilities—mean it is now possible to produce a supersonic jet that is more economical and less noisy than those of the 1970s. It is time to rescind the ban in favor of a more modest and sensible noise standard. BACKGROUND Past studies addressing the ban on supersonic flight have had little effect. However, this paper takes a comprehensive view of the topic, covering the history of supersonic flight, the case for supersonic travel, the problems raised by supersonic flight, and regulatory alternatives to the ban. Dourado and Hammond synthesize the best arguments for rescinding the ban on supersonic flights over land and establish that the ban has had a real impact on the development of supersonic transport. KEY FINDINGS The FAA Should Replace the Ban on Overland Supersonic Flight with a Noise Standard The sonic boom generated by the Concorde and other early supersonic aircraft was very loud, and as a result the FAA banned flights in the United States from going faster than the speed of sound (Mach 1). This ban should be rescinded and replaced with a noise standard. A noise limit of 85–90 A-weighted decibels would be similar to noise standards for lawnmowers, blenders, and motorcy- cles, and would therefore be a reasonable standard during daytime hours. -
A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019
Airbus A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958-2019 Contents Scope and definitions 02 1.0 2020 & beyond 05 Accidents in 2019 07 2020 & beyond 08 Forecast increase in number of aircraft 2019-2038 09 2.0 Commercial aviation accidents since the advent of the jet age 10 Evolution of the number of flights & accidents 12 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 13 Impact of technology on aviation safety 14 Technology has improved aviation safety 16 Evolution of accident rates by aircraft generation 17 3.0 Commercial aviation accidents over the last 20 years 18 Evolution of the yearly accident rate 20 Ten year moving average of accident rate 21 Accidents by flight phase 22 Distribution of accidents by accident category 24 Evolution of the main accident categories 25 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accident rates 26 Loss Of Control In-flight (LOC-I) accident rates 27 Runway Excursion (RE) accident rates 28 List of tables & graphs 29 A Statistical Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents 1958 / 2019 02 Scope and definitions This publication provides Airbus’ a flight in a commercial aircraft annual analysis of aviation accidents, is a low risk activity. with commentary on the year 2019, Since the goal of any review of aviation as well as a review of the history of accidents is to help the industry Commercial Aviation’s safety record. further enhance safety, an analysis This analysis clearly demonstrates of forecasted aviation macro-trends that our industry has achieved huge is also provided. These highlight key improvements in safety over the factors influencing the industry’s last decades. -
Immaculate Flight Permit Agreement
GOAA OCT 19 2020 PERMIT AGREEMENT Commercial Propert\2s THE GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY, hereinafter referred to as "Authority," by its execution hereof, hereby authorizes the following person or entity, hereinafter referred to as "Company" to conduct business at Orlando International Airport, hereinafter referred to as "the Airport," for the purpose or purposes and on the terms and conditions hereinafter stated. 1. Company. The name and contact information of the Company hereunder are as follows: Company Name: Immaculate Flight LLC Address: 3677 Sysco Court, Grand Rapids, Ml 49512 Contact & Title: Brett Logan , President Telephone: (616) 460-5312 rax: (616) 825-6194 E-mail [email protected] Cell: N/A Company Financial Billing Contact(s). Name & Title: Jenn Lesinski, CFO Address: 3677 Sysco Court, Grand Rapids, Ml 49512 Telephone: (231) 670-0664 Fax: 616) 825-6194 E-mail [email protected] Cell: N/A 1 Compam - 24 Hour Emergency Contacts - minimum of 2 contacts required. Name & Title: Bart Adams Address: 3677 Sysco Court, Grand Rapids, Ml 49512 Telephone: (859) 494-8730 Fax: 616) 825-6194 E-mai l: [email protected] Cell: N//\ Name & Title: Tony Perkins Address: 3677 Sysco Court, Grand Rapids, Ml 49512 Telephone: (757) 284-4489 Fax: (616) 825-6194 E-mail: [email protected] Cell: NIA rev, sed 02.06 2020 Company Insurance Contact Name & Title: Jenn Lesinski, CFO Address: -- 36f7 Sysco·coui-(-Grand ·Raplcfa,-- MT495f2··-------------- ----- ------ Telephone: (231) 670-0664 Fax: (616) 825-6194 E-mail: [email protected] Cell: NIA Company Authorized Signature Contact Access Control (all badges and key requests') Name & Title: Brandon Brent , Central Florida Regional Sales Manager Address: 3677 Sysco Court, Grand Rapids, Ml 49512 Telephone: (407) 429-8623 Fax: (616) 825-6194 E-mail: [email protected] Cell: NIA 2. -
Transports ; Direction Générale De L'aviation Civile ; Direction Programmes Aéronautiques Civils (1962-1982)
Transports ; Direction générale de l'aviation civile ; Direction programmes aéronautiques civils (1962-1982) Répertoire (19830312/1-19830312/63) Archives nationales (France) Pierrefitte-sur-Seine 1983 1 https://www.siv.archives-nationales.culture.gouv.fr/siv/IR/FRAN_IR_020707 Cet instrument de recherche a été encodé par l'entreprise diadeis dans le cadre du chantier de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales sur la base d'une DTD conforme à la DTD EAD (encoded archival description) et créée par le service de dématérialisation des instruments de recherche des Archives Nationales 2 Archives nationales (France) INTRODUCTION Référence 19830312/1-19830312/63 Niveau de description fonds Intitulé Transports ; Direction générale de l'aviation civile ; Direction programmes aéronautiques civils Intitulé Transports ; programmes aéronautiques civils Date(s) extrême(s) 1962-1982 Localisation physique Pierrefitte DESCRIPTION Présentation du contenu SOMMAIRE TRAC, 53 T Construction aéronautique, généralités, 1975-1977. 30092-30093 611-612 Caravelle [financement, contrats, comparaison de coûts Caravelle 15], 1966-1978. 30094-30096 613-615 Mercure, 1966-1975. 30097-30104 616-623 Avions à décollage court (ADAC ou STOL), 1968-1976. 30105-30110 624-629 BAC 111, 1973-1977. 30111 630 Concorde, 1962-1976. 30112-30130 631-649 SNECMA, statuts, conseil d'administration, 1973-1979. 30131-30135 650-654 SNIAS (Aérospatiale), documents financiers et techniques, conseil d'administration, 1973-1979. 30136-30139 655-658 ONERA, Conseil d'administration, -
British Aerospace Jetstream 3102, G-CCPW.Pdf
AAIB Bulletin: 9/2006 G-CCPW EW/C2006/03/06 INCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: British Aerospace Jetstream 3102, G-CCPW No & Type of Engines: 2 Garrett AiResearch TPE331-10UGR-516H turboprop engnes Year of Manufacture: 987 Date & Time (UTC): 7 March 2006 at 905 hrs Location: Belfast Cty Arport Type of Flight: Publc Transport (Passenger) Persons on Board: Crew - 2 Passengers - 6 Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - None Nature of Damage: Damage to propellers and three runway lghts Commander’s Licence: Arlne Transport Plot’s Lcence Commander’s Age: 34 years Commander’s Flying Experience: 2,600 hours (of whch 370 were on type) Last 90 days - 110 hours Last 28 days - 40 hours Information Source: Aircraft Accident Report Form submitted by the pilot and further enqures by the AAIB Synopsis While taxiing along Runway 04 to line up on Runway 22 up, the arcraft was cleared by ATC to enter, back track the arcraft’s nose wheel left the paved surface at the and line up on Runway 22. He planned to use the turning end of the runway. Damage was caused to the aircraft’s circle at the threshold of Runway 22 to turn the aircraft propellers and three runway lights. around. Due to the weather, he was using the windscreen wipers intermittently. History of the flight The crew were operatng ther thrd sector of the day from The commander taxied the aircraft slowly down the Belfast City Airport to Ronaldsway, Isle of Man. The centre of Runway 04 towards the threshold of Runway 22 commander was the PF for this sector and taxied the and he could see contnuously the red stop-end lghts aircraft. -
Aeronautical Engineering
NASA SP-7037 (36) ND AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING A SPECIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY WITH INDEXES Supplement 36 OCTOBER 1973 ZkS&-Sp-7037 (36) EROAUTIC&L N74-14702 0GIEEG A SPCILL BIBLIOGMPHY WITH INDEXES, SUPPLENgIT 36 (N3AS) $5.25 Unclas 00/01 27136 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ACCESSION NUMBER RANGES Accession numbers cited in this Supplement fall within the following ranges: IAA (A-10000 Series) A73-34073 -- A73-37144 STAR (N-10000 Series) N73-25997 - N 73-27884 This bibliography was prepared by the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility operated for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by Informatics Tisco, Inc. The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the public business required by law of this Agency. Use of funds for printing this periodical has been approved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget through July 1, 1974. N74-14702 AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING - A SPECIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY (SUPPLEMENT 36) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Oct 73 N74-14702 1. Report No. 2. Governmmnt Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA SP-7037 (36) 4. Titleand Subtitle 5. Report Date October 1973 AERONAUTICAL ENG INEERING e.Performing Organization Code A Special Bibliography (Supplement 36) 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address National Aeronautics and Space Administration 11. Contractor Grant No. Washington, D. C; 20546 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. -
The Connection
The Connection ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2011: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2011 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISBN 978-0-,010120-2-1 Printed by 3indrush 4roup 3indrush House Avenue Two Station 5ane 3itney O72. 273 1 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 8arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 8ichael Beetham 4CB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air 8arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-8arshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman 4roup Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary 4roup Captain K J Dearman 8embership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol A8RAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA 8embers Air Commodore 4 R Pitchfork 8BE BA FRAes 3ing Commander C Cummings *J S Cox Esq BA 8A *AV8 P Dye OBE BSc(Eng) CEng AC4I 8RAeS *4roup Captain A J Byford 8A 8A RAF *3ing Commander C Hunter 88DS RAF Editor A Publications 3ing Commander C 4 Jefford 8BE BA 8anager *Ex Officio 2 CONTENTS THE BE4INNIN4 B THE 3HITE FA8I5C by Sir 4eorge 10 3hite BEFORE AND DURIN4 THE FIRST 3OR5D 3AR by Prof 1D Duncan 4reenman THE BRISTO5 F5CIN4 SCHOO5S by Bill 8organ 2, BRISTO5ES -
Qinetiq Group Plc – Notice of Annual General Meeting Ordinary
This document is important and requires your immediate attention. If you are in any doubt as to the action you should take, you should immediately consult your stockbroker, solicitor, accountant or other professional advisor duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all your shares in the Company, please send this document, and the accompanying form of proxy, to the purchaser or transferee or the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee. QinetiQ Group plc – Notice of Annual General Meeting NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General Meeting of QinetiQ Group plc (the Company) will be held at the offices of Ashurst LLP, Fruit and Wool Exchange, 1 Duval Square, London E1 6PW on Wednesday 24 July 2019 at 11.00am, or at any adjournment thereof, to consider and, if thought fit, to pass the following 21 resolutions. Resolutions 1 to 16 (inclusive) will be proposed as ordinary resolutions and will be passed if more than 50% of the total votes cast are in favour of each such resolution. Resolutions 17 to 21 (inclusive) will be proposed as special resolutions and will be passed if not less than 75% of the total votes cast are in favour of each such resolution. Voting on all resolutions will be conducted by way of poll rather than a show of hands. Ordinary Resolutions Resolution 1 – Report and Accounts a) to make political donations to political parties and/or independent To receive the accounts and the reports of the Directors and the auditor election candidates not exceeding £100,000 in total; thereon for the financial year ended 31 March 2019.