lvfarch 22, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 6669 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS NATIONAL PRAYER BREAKFAST human freedom and the solidarity of man many national honors, and I'm sure all of us kind. agree they were highly deserved. I know you Human freedom and solidarity, as a politi all want to join with me in expressing our HON.ARLANSTANGELAND cal ideal, leads to democracy, for this is gov appreciation to the choir for their outstand OF MINNESOTA ernment for the people and by the people; ing performance this morning. e This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. 6670 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS March 22, 1983 don't belong to your church." To which the visiting member of a legislative body of an he was a little on the impudent side, a.nd he chaplain responded, "That may be true, other nation. was teasi!lg her a little bit, and he asked her young man, but you do belong to my God." Our international guests are always called after she got home from church what the It is through that sense of belonging that upon to share with us information about sermon was about and she couldn't remem in the Senate Prayer Breakfast we have groups similar to ours back in their home ber; and what the scripture was, and she come to appreciate our own vulnerability as countries. We are careful to avoid any spirit couldn't remember that. And he said, well, a means of acknowledging our deep faith in of partisanship by rotating our offices with grandmother, why do you go to church? God, our hopes for ourselves, and our de a Democrat president one year and a Re And she answered him this way, said, son, pendence on our love for others. publican the next, and our typical Thursday take that basket and go down to the spring As we gather this morning from all cor morning meeting begins with the regarding and bring me back some water. So without ners of the world, may the spirit of the Lord of a verse of scripture, followed by a prayer thinking the lad took the basket and he move us to open our individual windows to and a hymn. Our unofficial chaplain then went down to the spring and he dipped it in the strength of His love. That is our greet reports on Members or former Members of the water, and of course the water ran ing to you this day. 11-059 Q-87-41 (Pt. 5) 6674 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS March 22, 1983 11-059 0-87-42 (Pt. 5) 6682 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS March 22, 1983 to defend itself and its allies. But the The clearinghouses may also become would otherwise remain dependent sophistication, technology, and de centers for other child care-related ac upon Federal handouts are becoming structiveness of today's weapons, all tivity. Potential services include offer productive, taxpaying and more inde make those decisions tougher and ing technical assistance and training pendent. more crucial than they have been at to providers to increase services or up The Rehabilitation Services Admin any time in history. In addition, the grade existing services; providing feed istration's latest report to Congress es opponents of freedom and democracy back from users to providers regarding timates that for every $1 spent on vo are stronger than at any time in histo quality of services; coordinating activi cational rehabilitation, there is a ry, and we must not slacken from our ties of advocacy groups, agencies deal return in excess of $10. The most responsibility to lead the free world. ing with child and family issues, child recent data available from RSA shows The defense debate will not disap care providers and families; and work that in the first year after case clo pear; in fact, it will grow more intense. ing with the business community to sure, persons rehabilitated in fiscal And well it should. If the decisions set up employer-assisted dependent year 1981 paid $211.5 million more in today are incorrect, not only America, care programs. income, payroll and State taxes than but the entire free world will be vul The use of computers to collect data they would have paid without rehabili nerable.• on child care will integrate the new tation. Another $68.9 million was technology with the social services, saved as a result of decreased depend CHILD CARE INFORMATION AND with machines working to serve ency on public support payments and REFERRAL SERVICES ACT human needs. institutional care. In just 1 year, the The Child Care Information and Re benefits to government was $280.4 mil HON. BARBARA A. MIKULSKI ferral Services Act is a future-oriented lion. In 4 years, the entire cost to gov initiative designed to facilitate re ernment of those rehabilitations OF MARYLAND source efficiency in the present and to IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES would be returned. encourage resource upgrading and ex It only makes sense to fully support Tuesday, March 22, 1983 pansion in the future. I urge my col a program that has a 63-year track eMs. MIKULSKI. Mr. Speaker, I am leagues to support this legislation.e record of successful return on the Fed pleased today to be joined by my col eral dollar. Presently, however, the leagues, Ms. FERRARO, Mrs. SCHROEDER, REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 Council of State Administrators of Vo Mrs. KENNELLY, Ms. 0AKAR, Mr. CON cational Rehabilitation estimate that ABLE, Mrs. BOGGS, Mrs. COLLINS, Mr. only 1 in 20 disabled individuals eligi PERKINS, and Mr. GEORGE MILLER, in HON. AUSTIN J. MURPHY ble for rehabilitation services can be introducing the Child Care Informa OF PENNSYLVANIA accepted into vocational rehabilitation tion and Referral Services Act. This IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES programs because of monetary limita legislation is part of the Women's Eco Tuesday, March 22, 1983 tions-people who could work if reha nomic Act and is sponsored in the bilitation services were provided. Senate by Mr. GARY HART. e Mr. MURPHY. Mr. Speaker, I would like to advise my colleagues Congress has consistently given bi Finding child care can be extremely partisan support to the Rehabilitation difficult. Changes in family structures that I have introduced legislation to extend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Act. In the past 2 years we have reject and in employment schedules make ed a proposal to put the program into that job even harder. There are more as amended. Title I of this act, the State grants program, remains the a block grant and continued to in single parents who work and more crease its funding rather than reduce two-parent families where both par Federal Government's primary em ployment program for disabled Ameri it by as much as 30 percent, as the ad ents work. Quality child care is becom ministration proposed. Nevertheless, ing scarcer and scarcer. When families cans. It insures that a wide range of have nontraditional needs for child rehabilitation services are available to we must recognize that current fund care-like care for infants, or care persons with substantial handicaps to ing levels do not come close to answer during night shifts-finding child care employment but who have the poten ing the need. That the number of dis is a real struggle. tial to become gainfully employed. abled individuals served and rehabili Information and referral clearing The act's programs have become a tated has steadily decreased over the houses will be one-stop shops where model of coordinated and comprehen past 7 years does not reflect problems parents can find out about child care sive efforts interrelating basic services within the act itself, but rather the services in their communities. with research, training, independent erosion of its funding base due to in This legislation sets up an $8 million living and competitive job placement flation as well as sharp reductions in Federal grant program to fund new or programs. Furthermore, this act pro SSI and SSDI funds for vocational re improve existing information and re tects the civil rights of disabled Ameri habilitation. In addition, Congress has ferral clearinghouses. These clearing cans through its antidiscrimination made rehabilitation of the severely houses will work with parents and provisions. disabled a priority the last two times it with providers to help ff.milies find af There can be no argument that the has renewed this legislation. This fordable, convenient, and appropriate Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amend mandate should continue to be sup care for their children, and to help ed, should be extended. This piece of ported because, although it is more providers operate at full capacity. The legislation has the admirable distinc costly to serve the severely disabled, result is a match of families' needs tion of generating more revenue than this group is more dependent on which providers supply. is expended in its implementation. No public support and less likely to find In addition to making efficient ·use other human service funds are spent employment without rehabilitation of scarce resources, the information in such a cost-effective manner to help services than are the nonseverely dis and referral clearinghouses will have people live more self-sufficient and in abled. However, it costs 2 to 2¥2 times other benefits. The most important of dependent lives. Although apparent, it more money to rehabilitate the severe these is the information about child is difficult to measure the self-esteem ly disabled. Consequently, adequate care supply and demand the clearing resulting from participation in the funding levels need to be provided to houses will generate. Because there programs provided by this act. The implement the law as Congress intend are presently few facts about the tangible benefits to this country's eco ed. availability of child care services in nomic health, however, can and have The Rehabilitation Act Extension of specific communities, this data base been measured-in terms of increased 1983 does much to rectify this legisla will lay important groundwork for earning capacity and decreased reli tive intent/funding discrepancy by: future advocacy efforts. ance on public assistance. Persons who One, making permanent the authori- March 22, 1983 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 6683 zation of appropriations for the basic <2> Section 100(b)(2) of the Act is amend by inserting immediately before the period State grants program; two, increasing ed- the following: ", and such sums as may be the authorization of State grants ap in the first sentence by striking out necessary for each of the fiscal years 1984, propriations for the next 4 years at a "and" immediately before "$60,000,000" and 1985, and 1986". by inserting immediately before the period Section 623 of the Act is amended by rate calculated to restore the fiscal at the end of such sentence ", and such year 1979 purchasing power of the striking out "1982" and inserting in lieu sums as may be necessary for each of the thereof "1986". program by fiscal year 1987; three, set fiscal years 1984, 1985, and 1986"; and ting each annual increase for the by striking out all of the second sen EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA State grants program after fiscal year tence. TIONS FOR COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES FOR IN 1987 at the level of increase in the (3) Section 100(c)(2) is amended- DEPENDENT LIVING Consumer Price Index for each previ (A) in subparagraph by striking out SEc. 7. Section 731 of partE of the Act is ous year; and four, extending authori "If" and inserting in lieu thereof "Begin amended by inserting immediately before ning with fiscal year 1987, if"; and the period "and for each succeeding fiscal zation of appropriations for all other in subparagraph by striking out year ending before October 1, 1986". programs under the act for the next 3 "If" and inserting in lieu thereof "Begin fiscal years at "such sums as may be ning with fiscal year 1987, if". EFFECTIVE DATE necessary." (b) Section 112(a) of the Act is amended SEc. 8. This Act shall take effect October Fiscal year 1979 had been used as by inserting "and no less than $3,500,000 for 1, 1983 .• the point of reference because, from fiscal year 1984 and each of the two suc 1975 to 1979, the downward trend in ceeding fiscal years," after "fiscal years,".
<<