DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Governance Review for Eden District Second Stage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Governance Review for Eden District Second Stage Report No: G22/18 Eden District Council Council 15 February 2018 Community Governance Review for Eden District Second Stage Consultation Portfolio: Resources Report from: Deputy Chief Executive Wards: All Wards OPEN PUBLIC ITEM 1 Purpose 1.1 To enable consideration to be given to proceeding to the second stage of consultation for the Community Governance Review for Parish and Town Councils and Parish Meetings within Eden District. 2 Recommendation It is recommended that the Deputy Chief Executive be authorised to commence a second stage of consultation with the following parishes: a) Barton Parish Council with regard to increasing the number of Councillors within Barton Parish and changing the name of the council to ‘Pooley Bridge Parish Council’; b) Brougham Parish Council and Temple Sowerby Parish Council with regard to merging the two Parish Councils; c) Castle Sowerby Parish Council with regard to exploring the viability of retaining the parish council but separating the parish boundary into 2 wards; d) Crackenthorpe Parish Meeting and Long Marton Parish Council with regard to merging the two parishes, with Crackenthorpe becoming a 1 member ward within Long Marton Parish Council; e) Dacre Parish Council with regard to reducing the number of councillors within Dacre Parish; f) Helbeck Parish Meeting and Brough Parish Council with regard to merging the two parishes; g) Hutton Parish Council and Greystoke Parish Council with regard to Motherby village being placed wholly within Hutton Parish, and ensuring that the parish boundaries are coterminous with the District Ward boundaries; h) Kirkby Thore Parish Council, Newbiggin Parish Meeting and Temple Sowerby Parish Council with regard to exploring boundary changes requested by Kirkby Thore Parish Council; i) Murton Parish Meeting with regard to exploring whether the Parish Meeting should have the name ‘Hilton’ included in the parish name; j) Ousby Parish Council with regard to splitting the Parish into two separate Parish Councils, ‘Ousby Parish Council’ and ‘Melmerby Parish Council’; and k) Thrimby Parish Meeting, Little Strickland Parish Meeting and Great Strickland Parish Council with regard to either Thrimby merging with Little Strickland Parish Meeting or both Thrimby and Little Strickland merging with Great Strickland Parish Council. 3 Report Details 3.1 The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 gives full responsibility for Community Governance Reviews to principal councils in England. At the full Council meeting on 7 September 2017, it was resolved that a full Community Governance Review should be undertaken and further, a six member working group should established to advise the Deputy Chief Executive on recommendations to be made as part of the Community Governance Review. An extract from the Council minutes can be found at Appendix A to this report. 3.2 The first Working Group meeting was held on 2 October 2017, with the Chairman of the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Board being elected as Chairman of the Working Group. The Working Group established that all Town, Parish Councils and Parish Meetings should be contacted as part of the first consultation as well as all electors within the parishes being encouraged to comment as well. An electronic survey would be set up on a commonly used survey builder, with paper copies being available at libraries and through Member services. Written submissions would also be considered. 3.3 The public consultation period began Thursday 16 November 2017, and ran through until Friday 22 December 2017. During this time publicity surrounding the Community Governance Review process took place, with articles in the Cumberland and Westmorland Herald, press releases, and posters and leaflets being distributed widely throughout the District. County and District Councillors were encouraged to respond, as were the statutory consultees Cumbria County Council, the Lake District National Park Authority and the Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority . Cumbria Association of Local Councils (CALC) have been consulted on a number of occasions regarding the Community Governance Review. The Deputy Chief Executive appeared on Eden FM to further publicise the consultation process. 3.4 Out of 72 Parish Councils and Meetings, 44 responded to the questionnaire, with 28 not responding. There were also 34 public responses, from a wide range of parish residents across the District. There was one response from a County Councillor. 3.5 Of the 44 Parish Councils and Meetings that responded, 33 of those requested that there be no change to their governance arrangements. This information assembled in a document which was then distributed to the Working Group, who met for their second meeting on 15 January 2018. This document is attached at Appendix B. 3.6 The Working Group discussed each Parish Council who had responded with an indication that they wished to alter their governance arrangements in depth, assessing the viability of each request. Of the requests from parishes that had been received, the Working Group felt that recommendations to proceed could be made for eight of the Parishes. Two Parishes’ requests did not gain support from the Working Group. These parishes were Penrith Town Council and Waitby Parish Meeting. 3.7 The parishes for which there are specific proposals which are recommended to be the subject of a second stage of consultation are Barton, Brougham, Crackenthorpe, Dacre, Hutton, Kirkby Thore, and Ousby. The minutes of the meeting of the Working Group of 15 January 2018 are attached at Appendix C. 3.8 Consideration was further given to the public response to the questionnaire. The Working Group especially noted the depth of feeling regarding the parish of Ousby which had 13 public respondents which is by far the largest number for any single parish at this stage of consultation. Due consideration was given to all of these public responses. The Working Group recommended that two further Parish Councils should proceed to the second stage of consultation. These Parishes were Castle Sowerby Parish Council and Murton Parish Council. 3.9 Consideration was given to the viability of Thrimby Parish Meeting. Thrimby has an electorate of just 21 and has not had a clerk or a meeting for a number of years, contravening the legal requirement to have a formal meeting at least twice a year. The Working Group recommended that the following two options be the subject of the second stage of consultation: (a) Thrimby to merge with Little Strickland (current electorate 57); or (b) Both Thrimby and Little Strickland to merge with Great Strickland Parish Council (current electorate 205). 3.10 Helbeck Parish Meeting has an electorate of 6 and whilst it is currently functioning the Working Group had concerns about the long term viability of the Parish. The Working Group asked for consideration to be given to merging Helbeck with Brough Parish Council to enable the residents to continue to be represented, and requested that this option be included as part of the second stage of consultation with both parishes. 3.11 The Working Group recommended that officers proceed to the second stage of consultation for the parishes affected by the recommendations made in this report, with initial contact to be made with the parishes affected to obtain their views and public meetings to be set up as required. 3.12 Proceeding to the second stage of consultation with parishes will allow Members and officers to have a clearer idea of exactly what Parish Councils and their parishioners want to make them more sustainable. 4 Policy Framework 4.1 The Council has four corporate priorities which are: Decent Homes for All; Strong Economy, Rich Environment; Thriving Communities; and Quality Council 4.2 This report meets the corporate priority of Thriving Communities. 5 Consultation 5.1 Full Council were consulted on the need to undertake a full Community Governance Review in Eden District on 7 September 2017. Members requested, amongst other matters, that a six-member Working Group be set up to advise the Deputy Chief Executive on recommendations to be made. 5.2 A full public consultation exercise was undertaken between Thursday 16 November 2017 and Friday 22 December 2017, enabling all parishes to discuss and respond to the consultation, as well as all members of the electorate within Eden District. 6 Implications 6.1 Financial and Resources 6.1.1 Any decision to reduce or increase resources or alternatively increase income must be made within the context of the Council’s stated priorities, as set out in its Council Plan 2015-19 as agreed at Council on 17 September 2015. 6.1.2 There is minimal budget provision for the Review to assist with postage costs and advertisements, otherwise it is anticipated that any other costs in respect of the Review will be found within existing budgets. 6.2 Legal 6.2.1 Chapter 3 of Part 4 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 devolves power to District Councils to undertake Community Governance Reviews. 6.2.2 The Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12, paragraph 4(1) and (3) requires that a Parish Meeting must assemble annually between 1 March and 1 June (both inclusive) and it must meet on at least one other occasion in the year. 6.2.3 Guidance from the Local Government Boundary Commission for England states that ‘reasonable periods for consultation’ should be built into any timetable for planning a Community Governance Review. Council agreed a timetable for processing the Community Governance Review, which is still being adhered to. This timetable has allowed the period from February through until April to undertake the second stage of consultation. 6.3 Human Resources 6.3.1 There will be staff resource involved in undertaking the Review and various teams across the Council will contribute to the work of the Review. However, the extra workload will not incur any additional staffing resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives
    Cumbria Archive Service CATALOGUE: new additions August 2021 Carlisle Archive Centre The list below comprises additions to CASCAT from Carlisle Archives from 1 January - 31 July 2021. Ref_No Title Description Date BRA British Records Association Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Moor, yeoman to Ranald Whitfield the son and heir of John Conveyance of messuage and Whitfield of Standerholm, Alston BRA/1/2/1 tenement at Clargill, Alston 7 Feb 1579 Moor, gent. Consideration £21 for Moor a messuage and tenement at Clargill currently in the holding of Thomas Archer Thomas Archer of Alston Moor, yeoman to Nicholas Whitfield of Clargill, Alston Moor, consideration £36 13s 4d for a 20 June BRA/1/2/2 Conveyance of a lease messuage and tenement at 1580 Clargill, rent 10s, which Thomas Archer lately had of the grant of Cuthbert Baynbrigg by a deed dated 22 May 1556 Ranold Whitfield son and heir of John Whitfield of Ranaldholme, Cumberland to William Moore of Heshewell, Northumberland, yeoman. Recites obligation Conveyance of messuage and between John Whitfield and one 16 June BRA/1/2/3 tenement at Clargill, customary William Whitfield of the City of 1587 rent 10s Durham, draper unto the said William Moore dated 13 Feb 1579 for his messuage and tenement, yearly rent 10s at Clargill late in the occupation of Nicholas Whitfield Thomas Moore of Clargill, Alston Moor, yeoman to Thomas Stevenson and John Stevenson of Corby Gates, yeoman. Recites Feb 1578 Nicholas Whitfield of Alston Conveyance of messuage and BRA/1/2/4 Moor, yeoman bargained and sold 1 Jun 1616 tenement at Clargill to Raynold Whitfield son of John Whitfield of Randelholme, gent.
    [Show full text]
  • Königreichs Zur Abgrenzung Der Der Kommission in Übereinstimmung
    19 . 5 . 75 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 128/23 1 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . April 1975 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75/268/EWG (Vereinigtes Königreich ) (75/276/EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN 1973 nach Abzug der direkten Beihilfen, der hill GEMEINSCHAFTEN — production grants). gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ Als Merkmal für die in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buch­ päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft, stabe c ) der Richtlinie 75/268/EWG genannte ge­ ringe Bevölkerungsdichte wird eine Bevölkerungs­ gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75/268/EWG des Rates ziffer von höchstens 36 Einwohnern je km2 zugrunde vom 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berg­ gelegt ( nationaler Mittelwert 228 , Mittelwert in der gebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebie­ Gemeinschaft 168 Einwohner je km2 ). Der Mindest­ ten (*), insbesondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2, anteil der landwirtschaftlichen Erwerbspersonen an der gesamten Erwerbsbevölkerung beträgt 19 % auf Vorschlag der Kommission, ( nationaler Mittelwert 3,08 % , Mittelwert in der Gemeinschaft 9,58 % ). nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments , Eigenart und Niveau der vorstehend genannten nach Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts- und Sozialaus­ Merkmale, die von der Regierung des Vereinigten schusses (2 ), Königreichs zur Abgrenzung der der Kommission mitgeteilten Gebiete herangezogen wurden, ent­ sprechen den Merkmalen der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : der Richtlinie
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Gallery Geograph
    INDEX TO GALLERY GEOGRAPH IMAGES These images are taken from the Geograph website under the Creative Commons Licence. They have all been incorporated into the appropriate township entry in the Images of (this township) entry on the Right-hand side. [1343 images as at 1st March 2019] IMAGES FROM HISTORIC PUBLICATIONS From W G Collingwood, The Lake Counties 1932; paintings by A Reginald Smith, Titles 01 Windermere above Skelwith 03 The Langdales from Loughrigg 02 Grasmere Church Bridge Tarn 04 Snow-capped Wetherlam 05 Winter, near Skelwith Bridge 06 Showery Weather, Coniston 07 In the Duddon Valley 08 The Honister Pass 09 Buttermere 10 Crummock-water 11 Derwentwater 12 Borrowdale 13 Old Cottage, Stonethwaite 14 Thirlmere, 15 Ullswater, 16 Mardale (Evening), Engravings Thomas Pennant Alston Moor 1801 Appleby Castle Naworth castle Pendragon castle Margaret Countess of Kirkby Lonsdale bridge Lanercost Priory Cumberland Anne Clifford's Column Images from Hutchinson's History of Cumberland 1794 Vol 1 Title page Lanercost Priory Lanercost Priory Bewcastle Cross Walton House, Walton Naworth Castle Warwick Hall Wetheral Cells Wetheral Priory Wetheral Church Giant's Cave Brougham Giant's Cave Interior Brougham Hall Penrith Castle Blencow Hall, Greystoke Dacre Castle Millom Castle Vol 2 Carlisle Castle Whitehaven Whitehaven St Nicholas Whitehaven St James Whitehaven Castle Cockermouth Bridge Keswick Pocklington's Island Castlerigg Stone Circle Grange in Borrowdale Bowder Stone Bassenthwaite lake Roman Altars, Maryport Aqua-tints and engravings from
    [Show full text]
  • The National and Community Averages Being 228 And
    19 . 5 . 75 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 128/231 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 28 April 1975 concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive No 75/268/EEC (United Kingdom ) (75/276/EEC ) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 75% of the national average (£ 1 072 and £ 1 436 respectively); Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Euro­ pean Economic Community ; Whereas the index relating to the low population density referred to in Article 3 ( 4) ( c ) of Directive Having regard to Council Directive No 75/268/ No 75/268/EEC does not exceed 36 inhabitants per EEC (*) of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill square kilometre ( the national and Community farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas , averages being 228 and 168 inhabitants per square and in particular Article 2 ( 2 ) thereof ; kilometre respectively ; whereas the minimum propor­ tion of the working population engaged in agriculture as a percentage of the total working population is Having regard to the proposal from the Commission ; 19% ( the national and Community averages being 3-08 and 9-58 % respectively); Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament ; "Whereas the nature and level of the abovementioned indices, utilized by the Government of the United Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Kingdom to define the areas notified to the Commis­ Social Committee ( 2 ); sion , corresponds to the characteristics of less favoured farming areas referred to in Article 3 (4) of Whereas the United
    [Show full text]
  • Documents from The
    Documents from the Edenhall Estate, Cumbria Transcribed from the seller’s photos on eBay by Petra E. Mitchinson 2009 Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 6 The MUSGRAVE Family, Baronets of Edenhall ...................................................... 7 Transcriptions ............................................................................................................. 9 22 Apr 1671. Account for masons’ repairs at Hartley Castle .......................................... 9 25 Dec 1674. HM Customs House account, Carlisle port ............................................... 9 18 May 1681. Marriage agreement Mary MUSGRAVE & John DAVISON ................ 10 09 Sep 1686. Soulby Court Baron rents & fines list ..................................................... 12 1690s. Tenants’/voters’ list, Middle & West Ward, Westmorland ................................ 13 16 Sep 1708. Receipt for grass and cattle sold ............................................................. 15 20 Sep 1708. Receipt for 4 oxen and cattle .................................................................. 16 26 Jul 1710. List of live and dead goods at Edenhall & Hartley ................................... 16 14 May 1712. Receipt for various taxes ....................................................................... 17 08 Jul 1712. Receipt by the Rector of Crosby Garrett .................................................. 18 28 Jul 1712. Receipt for 6 rakes
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 112 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. MZ LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION POR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin.QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albeoarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholm. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. Mr F B Young, CB£. To the Ht Hon Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department F20POSALS FOR FUTUHE ELECTORAL AIWANGEriOTS FOR THE EDEN DISTRICT IN THE COUN'nr OF CUMBRIA 1. \Ve, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the Eden district, in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972» present our proposals for the future electoral arrange- ments for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Eden District Council, copies of which were circulated to the Cumbria County Council, parish councils and parish meetings in Eden district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of the local newspapers circu- lating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Housing Supplementary Planning Document
    Draft Housing Supplementary Planning Document January 2019 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose of the Housing Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) .............5 1.2 Status of the Housing SPD.............................................................................5 2 Affordable Housing..........................................................................6 2.1 What is Affordable Housing?..........................................................................6 2.2 How much Affordable Housing do developers need to provide? ...................8 2.3 Viability ...........................................................................................................9 2.4 Affordable Housing statement and viability appraisal.....................................9 2.5 What is a commuted sum and when is it required?......................................10 2.6 How is a commuted sum calculated?...........................................................10 2.7 When should a commuted sum be paid? .....................................................10 2.8 How are commuted sum payments used? ...................................................10 2.9 What is a rural exception site? .....................................................................11 2.10 Where is it acceptable for a rural exception site to be located?................12 2.11 How are Housing Needs Assessed?.........................................................13 2.12 What is a housing needs
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020/January 2021
    Link THE PARISH MAGAZINE FOR ORTON, TEBAY AND RAVENSTONEDALE WITH NEWBIGGIN-ON-LUNE December 2020/January 2021 THE LINK IS PUBLISHED BY THE HURD THE WORD PAROCHIAL CHURCH COUNCILS OF ALL SAINTS’, CHURCH, ORTON, From the Revd. Alun Hurd with ST JAMES’ CHURCH, TEBAY, AND ST OSWALD’S CHURCH, RAVENSTONEDALE ‘So, this is Christmas…’ begins with lockdown and restrictions WITH NEWBIGGIN-ON-LUNE the John Lennon and Yoko Ono like we could never have Christmas song, Happy Xmas imagined. with lots of sorrow and VICAR (War is over) hitting No 4 in the sadness. We cannot ignore that, Revd. Alun Hurd 01931 714812 singles charts of 1972. 3 Crown Inn Fields, Morland, CA10 3EB and even if has not affected us Email: [email protected] They might be our words and personally, we must bear the thoughts as we contemplate what Curate weight along, with the bereaved, of Fran Parkinson 23393 our Christmas will be like this the tears and grief that engulf Email: [email protected] year. And as I write no one can be them and this planet. Retired clergy quite sure what we will be allowed I do not know what your Ian Elliott 24441 to do and where we can go during Christmas will be like or mine, or Christopher Jenkin 24410 the Christmas season. if you will be able to be with loved Reader Emeritus There is an uncertainty which ones or not. What I do know is Reg Capstick 24497 the pandemic has brought to the that the human spirit will ORTON with Tebay UK and our planet that may be persevere eventually through most CHURCHWARDENS resolved with the advent of difficulties, and with God’s Holy Chris Bland 24258 vaccines to combat the virus; we Spirit we can be encouraged and Angela Milburn 24382 Linda Garrick 24262 certainly hope so and pray for that strengthened to be little lights of Martin Lawson 26028 to be the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Westmoreland in the Late Seventeenth Century by Colin Phillips
    WESTMORLAND ABOUT 1670 BY COLIN PHILLIPS Topography and climate This volume prints four documents relating to the hearth tax in Westmorland1. It is important to set these documents in their geographical context. Westmorland, until 1974 was one of England’s ancient counties when it became part of Cumbria. The boundaries are shown on map 1.2 Celia Fiennes’s view in 1698 of ‘…Rich land in the bottoms, as one may call them considering the vast hills above them on all sides…’ was more positive than that of Daniel Defoe who, in 1724, considered Westmorland ‘A country eminent only for being the wildest, most barren and frightful of any that I have passed over in England, or even Wales it self. ’ It was a county of stark topographical contrasts, fringed by long and deep waters of the Lake District, bisected by mountains with high and wild fells. Communications were difficult: Helvellyn, Harter Fell, Shap Fell and the Langdale Fells prevented easy cross-county movement, although there were in the seventeenth century three routes identified with Kirkstone, Shap, and Grayrigg.3 Yet there were more fertile lowland areas and 1 TNA, Exchequer, lay subsidy rolls, E179/195/73, compiled for the Michaelmas 1670 collection, and including Kendal borough. The document was printed as extracts in W. Farrer, Records relating to the barony of Kendale, ed. J. F. Curwen (CWAAS, Record Series, 4 & 5 1923, 1924; reprinted 1998, 1999); and, without the exempt, in The later records relating to north Westmorland, ed. J. F. Curwen (CWAAS, Record Series, 8, 1932); WD/Ry, box 28, Ms R, pp.1-112, for Westmorland, dated 1674/5, and excluding Kendal borough and Kirkland (heavily edited in J.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Society in Cumberland and Westmorland 1471-1537
    Political Society in Cumberland and Westmorland 1471-1537 By Edward Purkiss, BA (Hons). Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. School of History and Classics University of Tasmania. 2008. This Thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. 30 May, 2008. I place no restriction on the loan or reading of this thesis and no restriction, subject to the law of copyright, on its reproduction in any form. 11 Abstract The late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries have often been seen as a turning point in the development of the English state. At the beginning of the period the authority of the Crown was offset by powerful aristocratic interests in many regional areas. By the mid sixteenth century feudal relationships were giving way to a centrally controlled administration and government was reaching into regional political communities through direct connections between the Crown and local gentlemen. This thesis will trace these developments in Cumberland and Westmorland. It will argue that archaic aspects of government and society lingered longer here than in regions closer London. Feudal relationships were significant influences on regional political society well beyond the mid sixteenth century. This was a consequence of the area's distance from the centre of government and its proximity to a hostile enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Eden Unclassified Roads - Published January 2021
    Eden Unclassified Roads - Published January 2021 • The list has been prepared using the available information from records compiled by the County Council and is correct to the best of our knowledge. It does not, however, constitute a definitive statement as to the status of any particular highway. • This is not a comprehensive list of the entire highway network in Cumbria although the majority of streets are included for information purposes. • The extent of the highway maintainable at public expense is not available on the list and can only be determined through the search process. • The List of Streets is a live record and is constantly being amended and updated. We update and republish it every 3 months. • Like many rural authorities, where some highways have no name at all, we usually record our information using a road numbering reference system. Street descriptors will be added to the list during the updating process along with any other missing information. • The list does not contain Recorded Public Rights of Way as shown on Cumbria County Council’s 1976 Definitive Map, nor does it contain streets that are privately maintained. • The list is property of Cumbria County Council and is only available to the public for viewing purposes and must not be copied or distributed. STREET NAME TOWN DISTRICT ROAD NUMBER Albert Street PENRITH EDEN U3521/01 Albert Street (link to) PENRITH EDEN U3521/03 Alder Road PENRITH EDEN U3579/01 Alexandra Road PENRITH EDEN U3503 Anchor Close PENRITH EDEN U3591/01 Angel Lane PENRITH EDEN U3538/02 Apple Garth,
    [Show full text]