DOCSLIB.ORG

How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy | 1 How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy David Tipping, 2001 By David C. Tipping Edited by Yeareen Yun Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Australian government. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any Australian government entity, or other organization or professional association. 1. INTRODUCTION Access to adequate water supply and sanitation is the core premise of local level water security. Effective management of transboundary river basin systems and water quality risks is therefore fundamental to social progress and quality of life. Improved water quality management benefits many individual lives in riparian nations, and, as demonstrated by the annual new year blessing of the fish migrations, society at large throughout the Mekong River Basin. In 2001, the author investigated the use of sustainable development indicators to improve the institutional effectiveness of international environmental management regimes. A new framework was designed to evaluate beneficial uses of water. In addition, a case study was developed on the Lower Mekong River Basin system, which integrated measures of water and environmental quality and socio-economic development. The research objectives were: (1) improving the understanding of water quality issues; (2) benchmarking water resources management performance at local, national and regional levels; and (3) enhancing technical and administrative capabilities of transboundary river basin management regimes through capacity development focused on the achievement of sustainable development objectives, and obligations and duties under international law. This paper introduces the Mekong River Drinking Water Supply Index (DWSI) that was developed as a tool to evaluate the effectiveness of international treaty regime water quality management. It discusses new research that investigated whether the DWSI model could be optimized using fewer variables, while maintaining sensitivity to changing environmental and social conditions in an ecological system. | 2 How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy The findings suggest there is potential to reduce the number of variables in the DWSI, though the author considers that the model would lose its sensitivity to detecting spatial and temporal trends in water quality. Moreover, this loss of sensitivity would limit a capability to evaluate the performance of institutions and policies. This would curtail the ability of policymakers to inform governments and stakeholders on how best to achieve sustainable development outcomes and objectives, while meeting their obligations and duties to the international community of states. 1.1 Water Quality Modeling Over the last 20 years, water quality modeling for international or transboundary river basin systems has become an increasingly important area of planning and management for sustainable development, as well as a basis for the evaluation of international treaty regimes or multi-state commissions that are established to implement sustainability agreements in [1] accordance with international public law. The impact of water quality goes beyond just water and sanitation issues. It affects foreign policy as water and sanitation are basic human rights that states and nations have obligations to respect, protect and fulfill. [2] Water is undoubtedly the most universal necessity for humans. To ensure the adequate supply of water, effective governance of water is crucial. The development and implementation of policies, establishment of institutions and public engagement and consultations represent a starting point. Governance becomes more complex when there is a further requirement to manage water resources systems in a transboundary context. [3] Water governance issues are extremely important to the civil society ideal. The provision of wholesome and clean water for human consumption and hygiene, as well as for irrigated agriculture, is the foundation of global poverty reduction and sustainable development, and, a precondition for human development. The intrinsic value of water underscores the need for effective systems of water governance, particularly when water crosses borders, for human civilization to continue to thrive. Effective water governance has become one of the major challenges for human societies in [4] the twenty-first century. Whether it relates to the sharing of water resources for irrigation [5] in food production (as in the internally displaced person camps of Darfur, Sudan), for meeting essential drinking water supply and sanitation needs (as in the favela settlements of [6] Porto Alegre, Brazil), or for productive fishery habitat maintenance (as in the flooded forest [7] of Lake Tonle Sap, Cambodia), complex water issues are assuming critical proportions. New tools and methods of understanding sustainable development are needed in order to predict and prevent the perpetuation of such market failures that can undermine the value | 3 How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy of water. 1.2 Cooperation in Transboundary Systems Water governance and management are crucial for socio-economic development. In unmanaged transboundary river basins, water can become more finite when human and natural factors and constraints are summed up. Unchecked development and use of water can promote over-extraction and degradation of water quality, to the point that alternative beneficial uses of water are limited, or no longer possible or acceptable. Similarly, environmental changes and/or natural disasters can heighten water supply risk and create more uncertainty for communities. Sustainable socio-economic development becomes a question of cooperation between different political entities at multiple levels of governance. Such cooperation can take on many forms in differing regional and international contexts. When dealing with basic health, environmental and livelihood issues, efficient and effective collaboration and cooperation to [8] meet sustainability goals needs to be based on sound scientific information. Haas writes, “Regimes built with usable knowledge appear to be more effective at inducing states to achieve their intended goals of improving environmental quality… institutionalized knowledge has contributed to more effective multilateral environmental management.” One major challenge is how best to manage the quality of a finite supply of freshwater, while maintaining both the environmental quality and natural resource base of the human [9] system. Individuals and business entrepreneurs place different values on wholesome and [10] clean water. In contrast, nations and states are governed by public international law, while promoting the common good for diverse populations. Water issues arise through rapid and continued population growth and socio-economic development, which place increasing demands on the resource base. Technology and modern lifestyle expectations can further heighten these demands for water. In unmanaged transboundary river basins, ecological systems can reach a breaking point, tending towards tensions and conflicts between stakeholders, or nations or states having land in the basin. Such conflicts, in turn, harm people’s ability to use water for their needs, which can further exacerbate such tension and conflict. Treaties allow for more flexible allocations of water supply, including groundwater in aquifers. Treaties create more efficient management practices to mitigate environmental [11] externalities and reduce the potential for conflict, and yet treaties sometimes fail to address all externalities. Many externalities that fall on third parties are not foreseen or | 4 How Water Quality in Transboundary River Systems Affects Water, Sanitation, and Foreign Policy [12] considered by those whose actions create them. The approach taken to managing transboundary environmental resources has been to [13] establish international regimes or multi-state commissions with specific mandates. The Mekong River Commission (MRC) is the intergovernmental and international organization that oversees the 1995 Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin between Lao PDR, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. Under this agreement, the four nations agreed to “cooperate in all fields of sustainable development, utilization, management, and conservation of the water and related resources of the Mekong River Basin, such as navigation, flood control, fisheries, agriculture, hydropower [14] and environmental protection”. 1.3 Measuring Sustainable Development The benefits derived from unmanaged transboundary river basin systems are not usually shared equally among all stakeholders, international persons having land in the basin. The sharing of these resources has given rise to more than 400 international treaties on water issues. In 2001, in order to support member states of the Mekong River Commission and to enlighten policymakers and stakeholders on the risks and implications of political choices on water, the author investigated the use of sustainable development indicators to improve the institutional effectiveness of international environmental management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Native Boxwood Forests of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Native Boxwood Forests of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Forestry Department, Ukrainian National Forestry University (Lviv) Tbilisi 2016 TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. 2 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.1. Biodiversity of Georgia ........................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2. Forest Ecosystems .................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.3. Boxwood Forests in Forests Habitat Classification ................................................................................. 14 1.4. Georgian Forests Habitat in the Context of Climate Change
    [Show full text]
  • Guide 3 – Fish Farmer's Guide to Combating Parasitic
    GUIDE 3 – FISH FARMER’S GUIDE TO COMBATING PARASITIC INFECTIONS IN COMMON CARP AQUACULTURE e-NIPO: 833-20-103-X A Series of ParaFishControl Guides to Combating Fish Parasite Infections in Aquaculture. Guide 3 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 634429 (ParaFishControl). This output reflects only the author’s view and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Wherever the fish are, that's where we go. “ Richard Wagner “ Common carp is the third most cultivated freshwater species in the world. Carp aquaculture is usually performed in a semi-intensive manner, in earthen ponds, where parasitic diseases can easily compromise fish health, especially in the hot summer months, leading to production and economic losses. This guide provides useful information about the biological background of five parasites, their diagnostics and control measures. © A.S. Holzer List of Authors Dr Astrid S. Holzer, Principal Investigator and Team Leader Institute of Parasitology Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] Dr Pavla Bartošová-Sojková, Researcher Institute of Parasitology Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] Honorary Prof. Csaba Székely, Scientific Advisor and Team Leader Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, (former Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Hungary Email: [email protected] Dr Gábor Cech, Senior Researcher, Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, (former Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Hungary Email: [email protected] Dr Kálmán Molnár, Retired Scientific Advisor, Fish Pathology and Parasitology Research Team, Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research (former Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Hungary Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between Haplontic and Diplontic Life Cycles
    Difference Between Haplontic and Diplontic Life Cycles www.differencebetween.com Key Difference – Haplontic vs Diplontic Life Cycles In the context of biology, a biological life cycle is a sequence of changes a particular organism undergoes through means of reproduction (sexual or asexual) which finally returns to the original starting phase. This procedure differs from one organism to the other. During sexual reproduction, the life cycle includes the change of ploidy; the alternation of haploid (n) and diploid (2n) stages. Meiosis occurs during the change over from a diploid stage to a haploid stage. With regards to change of ploidy, life cycles are of three types. They are, haplontic, diplontic and haplodiplontic. In a haplontic life cycle, the haploid stage is typically multicellular and results in the formation of a diploid (2n) cell, which is a zygote. The zygote undergoes meiosis, which results in the formation of haploid (n) cells. In a diplontic life cycle, the diploid stage is typically multicellular, and meiosis occurs during gamete formation which results in the production of haploid (n) gametes. During fertilization, the haploid (n) gametes fuse together in the formation of a diploid (2n) zygote, and it mitotically divides and produces a multicellular diploid (2n) organism. This is the key difference between haplontic and diplontic life cycles. What is a Haplontic Life Cycle? Haplontic life cycle involves the formation of a haploid (n) single cell by the meiosis of a diploid (2n) zygote. This phenomenon could be explained with sporic meiosis – the process of formation of spores. In this process, the zygote mitotically divides and produces multicellular sporophyte which is diploid (2n).
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL COMPASS Aquaculture Roundtable Brief
    Science in Action: Exploring the Future of U.S. Aquaculture A COMPASS Roundtable on Ocean Aquaculture As the population continues to expand—both domestically and globally—identifying secure, safe sources of protein is a critical need. With two-thirds of the planet covered in water, it is logical to turn to the ocean as an arena for producing food. Globally, aquaculture is the fastest growing food sector,[i] underscoring the importance of understanding the scientific, policy, and social implications of ocean aquaculture. As with all types of cultivated food production, there are complex and interwoven challenges and opportunities in ocean aquaculture.[ii] Indigenous knowledge and current research can answer questions around environmental safeguards, ecological impacts, long-term sustainable use of marine resources, and the social dimensions of ocean aquaculture. While we’ve developed a deeper scientific understanding of aquaculture, there remains a gap between the state of the science, federal policy, and public perceptions of ocean aquaculture in the U.S.[iii] In order to help provide research insights on the science related to aquaculture, COMPASS convened a roundtable discussion with scientists and policymakers in July 2019. The Roundtable examined ways that science can inform safe, sustainable, and socially acceptable ocean aquaculture in the United States. In preparation, COMPASS staff examined the U.S. aquaculture landscape by speaking with more than 50 scientists, managers, policymakers, and tribal representatives. These stage-setting conversations reflected the key concerns surrounding ocean aquaculture such as best management practices, economics, pollution, interactions with wild populations, and climate change. They also highlighted some of the scientific, technological, and cultural advancements in contemporary aquaculture that could address and reduce some of the perceived risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Survivability of Moss and Fungal Spores in Tests Simulating
    Biological Sciences in Space, Vol.25 No.2-4, 83-92,Takahashi, 2011 Y. et al. Original Paper Survivability of Moss and Fungal spores irradiated for 30 min. On the other hand, a colony did not develop if the spores were Spores in Tests Simulating taken off the beads and irradiated for 10 min. Conditions of the ISS Outer Wall This indicates that UV does not penetrate to the other side of the beads, and so the spores on Yuichi Takahashi1*, Hirofumi Hashimoto2, that side can be protected from UV radiation. 3 1 ©2011 Jpn. Soc. Biol. Sci. Space; Article ID: Takuo Nakagawa and Shinpei Shibata 112502011 1Department of Astrophysics, Interactive Symbio- sphere Science, Yamagata University Graduate Key words; fungi, moss, spore, survivability, thermal cycle treatment, UV irradiation School of Science and Engineering, Kojirakawa- machi 1-4-12, Yamagata-City, Yamagata 990-8560, Introduction Japan 2 Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, There are many factors that can influence the survivability JAXA, Yoshinodai 3-1-1 Chuo-ku, Sagamihara- of terrestrial life (TL) in interstellar and interplanetary space, City, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan for example full-spectrum electromagnetic radiation from 3Inspection room, Kojirakawa-Shiseidoh Hospital, the sun, temperature fluctuations, cosmic particle radiation, Higashihara-machi 1-12-26, Yamagata-City, Ya- vacuum, and microgravity. However, space conditions can magata 990-0034, Japan only be partially simulated in ground experiments. Recently, several experiments have investigated the possibility of TL Abstract survival in space, for example EXPOSE-E (ESA Human Space Flight (2010) Expose, http:// smsc.cnes.fr/EXPOSE/), BIORISK (Baranow et al., 2009; Novikova et al., 2010) and To investigate whether terrestrial life (TL) can BIOPAN (De la Torre Noetzel et al., 2007; Devara et al., survive in interstellar and interplanetary space, 2010), while another one, TANPOPO, will take place in the an experiment was performed to simulate near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany 12Th (Presented by Biology Wing DIET KUD H.O.D Sushma Gupta H.O.D Renuka Nagpal and Rashpal Singh Under the Guidance of Sh
    1 | Page ​ ​ Botany 12th (Presented by Biology Wing DIET KUD H.O.D Sushma Gupta H.O.D Renuka Nagpal and Rashpal Singh Under the Guidance of Sh. Devinder Handoo H.O.D I/c DIET Kud) Unit-01 Reproduction in Flowering Plants Unit-01Marks- 07 ❖​ Asexual reproduction Asexual reproduction is a mode of reproduction by which offspring arise from a single parent, and inherit the genes of that parent only, it is reproduction which does not involve meiosis, or fertilization. A more stringent definition is agamogenesis which is reproduction without the fusion of gametes. Asexual reproduction is the primary form of reproduction for single-celled organisms such as the archaea, bacteria, and protists. Many plants and fungi reproduce asexually as well. While all prokaryotes reproduce asexually (without the formation and fusion of gametes), mechanisms for lateral gene transfer such as conjugation, transformation and transduction are sometimes likened to sexual reproduction. A lack of sexual reproduction is relatively rare among multicellular organisms, particularly animals, for reasons that are not completely understood. Current hypotheses suggest that asexual reproduction may have short term benefits when rapid population growth is important or in stable environments, while sexual reproduction offers a net advantage by allowing more rapid generation of genetic diversity, allowing adaptation to changing environments. Developmental constraints may underlie why few animals have relinquished sexual reproduction completely in their life-cycles. Contents • 1 Types o 1.1 Binary fission o 1.2 Budding o 1.3 Vegetative reproduction o 1.4 Spore formation o 1.5 Fragmentation o 1.6 Parthenogenesis o 1.7 Agamogenesis o 1.8 Apomixis and nucellar embryony • 2 Alternation between sexual and asexual reproduction 2 | Page ​ ​ • 3 Examples in animals Types of Asexual Reproduction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biogeomorphological Life Cycle of Poplars During the Fluvial Biogeomorphological Succession: a Special Focus on Populus Nigra L
    Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in : http://oatao.univ- toulouse.fr/ Eprints ID : 11091 To link to this article : doi:10.1002/esp.3515 URL : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3515 To cite this version : Corenblit, Dov and Steiger, Johannes and González, Eduardo and Gurnell, Angela M. and Charrier, Gaspard and Darrozes, José and Dousseau, Julien and Julien, Frédéric and Lambs, Luc and Larrue, Sébastien and Roussel, Erwan and Vautier, Franck and Voldoire, Olivier The biogeomorphological life cycle of poplars during the fluvial biogeomorphological succession: a special focus on Populus nigra L. (2014) Earth Surface Processes and Landforms . ISSN 0197- 9337 Any correspondance concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] DOI: 10.1002/esp.3515 The biogeomorphological life cycle of poplars during the fluvial biogeomorphological succession: a special focus on Populus nigra L. D. Corenblit, 1,2 * J. Steiger, 1,2 E. González, 3 A. M. Gurnell, 4 G. Charrier, 1,2 J. Darrozes, 5 J. Dousseau, 1,2 F. Julien, 6 L. Lambs, 6 S. Larrue, 1,2 E. Roussel, 7 F. Vautier 7 and O. Voldoire 1,2 1 Clermont Université, Maison des Sciences de l ’Homme, 4 rue Ledru, 63057, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France 2 CNRS, UMR 6042, GEOLAB – Laboratoire de géographie physique et environnementale, 63057, Clermont-Ferrand,
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/159489 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-06 and may be subject to change. UITNODIGING AZOLE RESISTANCE IN AZOLE RESISTANCE AZOLE RESISTANCE IN ASPERGILLUS: voor het bijwonen van de EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SURVEILLANCE openbare verdediging van mijn proefschrift Azole resistance in Aspergillus: epidemiology and surveillance ASPERGILLUS Vrijdag 16 september om 12.30 uur precies U bent van harte welkom : EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SURVEILLANCE | Jan W.M. van der Linden van | Jan W.M. AND SURVEILLANCE : EPIDEMIOLOGY bij deze plechtigheid en de aansluitende receptie in de Aula van de Radboud Universiteit, Comeniuslaan 2 6525 HP Nijmegen Jan van der Linden Kaar 13, 5374 JX, Schaijk [email protected] Paranimfen: Harm van Rooij Jan W.M. van der Linden Elke Appelhof [email protected] AZOLE RESISTANCE IN ASPERGILLUS: EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SURVEILLANCE Jan Wilhelmus Marinus van der Linden Colofon Explanation of the cover: The background photograph is a microscopic view of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus hyphae, recovered from pus from a patient with a kidney transplant. The Aspergillus isolate is projected over a picture of the globe, spreading out from a droplet in the middle of Europe nearby the Netherlands. It represents the global spread and threat of (knowledge and understanding of) resistant Aspergillus fumigatus around the world. ISBN/EAN: 978-90-825729-0-2 Lay-out by Corné van de Laar Cover design by Jan van der Linden The photograph on the cover was used with courtesy of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Wall Biology in Oomycete Pathogenicity
    Cell Wall Biology in Oomycete Pathogenicity (CBOP) The oomycete phylum is a group of eukaryotic microorganisms that comprises plant pathogens responsible for severe environmental damage and economic loss. Members of the genus Phytophthora infect woody plants in natural ecosystems and a wide range of agriculturally important crops such as potato, tomato and soybean. Phytophthora infestans is the causal agent of potato and tomato late blight and, as such, one of the most significant agricultural pathogens. This species was responsible for the Irish potato famine in the mid‐ 19th century and has had a tremendous impact on the history of human kind, resulting in malnutrition, famine and population displacement. It continues to impact world agriculture by causing the most destructive disease of potato. When left unchecked, the pathogen can destroy a potato field in a few days. Annual crop losses due to P. infestans represent billions of dollars globally. Potato is the fourth most important food crop in the world and an alternative to the major cereal crops for feeding the increasing world population. The area used for potato production is rising faster worldwide than for any other crop due to its high yield potential and excellent nutritional characteristics. The global production of potato, however, is seriously challenged by the susceptibility of the cultivars to P. infestans. Management of the pathogen is challenged by its remarkable speed of adaptation to control strategies such as genetically‐resistant cultivars. Thus, the development of alternative strategies to tackle P. infestans has become a priority for the agriculture industry. The main objective of the CBOP program was to identify specific protein targets for disease control, with a particular focus on enzymes involved in cell wall formation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KUZNETS CURVE and the LIFE CYCLE ANALOGY by 97/08
    THE KUZNETS CURVE AND THE LIFE CYCLE ANALOGY by R. U. AYRES 97/08/EPS This working paper was published in the context of INSEADs Centre for the Management of Environmental Resources, an RD partnership sponsored by Ciba-Geigy, Danfoss, Otto Group and Royal Dutch/Shell and Sandoz AG. * Sandoz Professor of Management and the Environment at INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cede; France. A working paper in the INSEAD Working Paper Series is intended as a means whereby a faculty researchers thoughts and findings may be communicated to interested readers. The paper should be considered preliminary in nature and may require revision. Printed at INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France. The Kuznets Curve and the Life Cycle Analogy A Robert U. Ayres Center for the Management of Environmental Resources INSEAD Fontainebleau, France January 1997 Abstract The growth and, especially, the successions of industrial sectors strongly suggests an "aging" phenomenon. In fact, the Kuznets curve was originally based on this notion. More recently, the aging idea has been more fully elaborated into a 'life cycle' scheme (conception, birth, childhood, adolescence, maturity and senescence) which corresponds quite closely with the observed stages of development of a new technology or product. The question arises: is the life cycle analogy sufficiently general to constitute a set of "stylized facts" around which a theory could be developed? In particular, is the life cycle reversible? If so, under what circumstances? The paper addresses these questions and concludes with some observations about the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and its applicability to the question of whether economic growth is compatible with long-term sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomopathogenic Nematodes and Their Bacterial Symbionts: the Inside out of a Mutualistic Association
    ~ I SYMBIOSIS (2008) 46. 65-75 ©2008 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot ISSN 0334-5114 Review article Entomopathogenic nematodes and their bacterial symbionts: The inside out of a mutualistic association S. Patricia Stock1* and Heidi Goodrich Blair2 'Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, 1140 E. South Campus Dr., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Tel. + 1-520-626-3854, Email. [email protected]; 2Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin Madison, 1550 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706, USA, Tel.+ 1-608-265-4537, Email. [email protected] (Received October 19, 2007; Accepted January 7, 2008) Abstract Entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema and Heterorhabditis spp. (Nematoda: Steinemematidae, Heterorhabditidae) and their bacterial symbiont bacteriaXenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp (Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae) represent an emerging model of terrestrial animal-microbe symbiotic relationships. Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp. are harbored as symbionts in the intestine of the only free-living stage of the nematodes, also known as the infective juvenile or 3rd stage infective juvenile. The bacterium-nematode pair is pathogenic for a wide range of insects and has successfully been implemented in biological control and integrated pest management programs worldwide. Moreover, realization of the practical use of these nematodes has spurred developments across a far broader scientific front. Recent years have seen an intensive worldwide search for fresh genetic materials resulting in an exponential growth of described new species and the discovery of thousands of new isolates worldwide. These nematodes and their bacterial symbionts are now considered a tractable model system that is amenable to study physiological, chemical, structural and developmental aspects of beneficial symbiotic associations. We herein provide an overview of the research done in relation to the study of the symbiotic interactions between Steinernema and Heterorhabditis nematodes and their bacterial symbionts.
    [Show full text]